Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

More Evidence of Gonzales Perjury Revealed in FBI Director's Notes

By Brian Beutler, Media Consortium. Posted August 17, 2007.


Documents provided by FBI Director Robert Mueller strengthen the case that Alberto Gonzales perjured himself before the Senate Judiciary committee.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Immigrants and Health-Care: What Part of LEGAL Doesn't Washington Understand?
Marielena Hincapié

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Brian Beutler

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Documents provided Thursday to House Democrats by FBI Director Robert Mueller reinforced the sense among Democrats and critics of the Bush Administration that Alberto Gonzales perjured himself before the Senate Judiciary committee about the physical condition of then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, as the White House attempted to seek his reauthorization of a controversial warrantless wiretapping program.

"Director Mueller's notes and recollections concerning the White House visit to the Attorney General's hospital bed confirm an attempt to goad a sick and heavily medicated Ashcroft to approve the warrantless surveillance program," said Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, who requested Mueller's notes last month.

"Particularly disconcerting is the new revelation that the White House sought Mr. Ashcroft's authorization for the surveillance program, yet refused to let him seek the advice he needed on the program.

The heavily redacted notes shed no further light upon other aspects of the controversy, including the Gonzales' much-disputed contention that a surveillance operation distinct from the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program was the source of discord within the Department of Justice

At issue is the truthfulness of Gonzales' testimony last month before the Senate Judiciary Committee during which he recounted a March 10, 2004 visit he and his fellow White House aide Andrew Card paid to Ashcroft and acting Attorney General James Comey at Ashcroft's hospital bedside.

In response to questions from Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA), Gonzales insisted that Ashcroft seemed lucid in the hospital, where the White House aides sought his reauthorization of a domestic surveillance program.

"Obviously, there was concern about General Ashcroft's condition," Gonzales told Specter, "and we would not have sought, nor did we intend, to get any approval from General Ashcroft if, in fact, he wasn't fully competent to make that decision."

But Mueller's notes belie that contention. One sentence, in particular, indicates that Ashcroft was anything other than fully competent: "AG in chair; is feeble, barely articulate, clearly stressed."

Mueller divulged the existence of his notes in his own testimony before Conyers' committee on July 26 in an exchange with Rep. Arthur Davis (D-AL). Davis asked Mueller whether he'd taken notes about the March 2004 evening and, if he had, why.

"It was out of the ordinary," Mueller replied.

"What was out of the ordinary Mr. Mueller?" Davis asked.

"Being asked to go to the hospital and be present at that time."

Conyers says he will continue explore both the issue of Ashcroft's health, but that he will also seek unredacted versions of Mueller's notes to clear up still-unclear related issues.

"We intend to fully investigate this incident and the underlying subject matter that evoked such widespread distress within the Department and the FBI. We will be seeking an unredacted copy of Director Mueller's notes covering meetings before and after the hospital visit and expect to receive information from several of the individuals mentioned in the document."

Newly mentioned individuals in Mueller's notes include Vice President Dick Cheney, and then-NSA Director Gen. Michael Hayden, then-Deputy CIA Director John McLaughlin, and then-CIA Director George Tenet.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: alberto gonzales, perjury, john ashcroft, judiciary

Brian Beutler reports for the Media Consortium.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Muellar seems to be a lonely hero...
Posted by: Blade on Aug 17, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a guy that led a rifle company for three years in Nam, Bronze star, then later in life prosecutes the Gotti case, the Lockerbie bombing, Noriega?
When nominated for the head of FBI in 2001, the other two nominees eventually dropped out, and he was unanimously confirmed 90 to 0!
He was the calvary coming to the rescue when called out to cut Gonzales off at the pass, that night at the hospital. I bet Gonzales was plenty surprised, that here he is sent over to muscle the ailing Ashcroft, bless his heart.

Who is in Mueller's corner, now? What's the back story on Mueller? His resume from Wikipedia reads like a movie star hero.
And he's been head of FBI for several years, how's he doing there?
We all owe Mueller and Ashcroft some thanks for standing their ground while Gonzales and Card was doing the muscle thing for Bush on an sick old man.

Wonder if a guy like Mueller would ever seek public office?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember: - I don't recall, I can't speak about that, that information is classified??
Posted by: wmGreybeard on Aug 17, 2007 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An excerpt from Will Durst on April 25th 07.

[ When asked about the decision to fire eight federal prosecutors, Gonzales insisted he wasn't involved, then after e-mails about meetings he attended were released, okay, maybe he was involved. But just a little. Microscopically. An eensy teensy teeny wee bit of a tad. He did admit to making the decision to fire the US Attorneys but couldn't remember when he made the decision. Seems to be a perennial theme with this administration. "Had absolutely nothing to do with it. Oh, you have evidence? Nope. Sorry. Can't remember. Its all a blur." ]

I fear there will be more of the same.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gonzales is a mafiosi lieutentant to the Bush Clan - James Baker Jr.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 17, 2007 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Words fail to describe the low and slimy character of this well-dressed goon, but Sidney Blumenthal did a good job at Salon:

The president won't fire Alberto Gonzales. He needs him to protect White House secrets, including the scheming roles of Cheney and Rove.

"Omerta (or a code of silence) has become the final bond holding the Bush administration together. Honesty is dishonorable; silence is manly; penitence is weakness. Loyalty trumps law. Protecting higher-ups is patriotism. Stonewalling is idealism. Telling the truth is informing. Cooperation with investigators is cowardice; breaking the code is betrayal. Once the code is shattered, however, no one can be trusted and the entire edifice crumbles."

Now, where are all the 'law-and-order' Republicans who were so prominent just a few years ago? Where are the moral conservatives now? Busy engaging in some 'extracurricular activities' with Bob Allen, Mark Foley and Karl Rove down in Florida?

Remember, Florida citizens - you have your 'stand your ground' law now, so if you see any of these creeps heading for your kids, you can fire at will. It's the law!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Without Gonzo, the World would truly know about 9/11
Posted by: BuckFush on Aug 17, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gonzo truly is the only thing keeping the cracked damn that is the secrecy of BushCo from crumbling. 1100+ signing statements will ensure years of obstruction.

9/11 was an inside job, and the Gonzo corruption scandal is just a symptom of the overall disease.

BushCo needed the justice department to be politicized so they could carry out their sinister agendas, including the destruction of the US Constitution by means of a terror stricken, fearful populace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THANK YOU MR. MUELLER!
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 17, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean that sincerely. Why is it that in the end it really won't matter? These people put everything on the line when they part with certain information and somehow it seems to disappear. Surely we can do better that that. Thank,s ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Question regarding Padilla, warrentless wire tapping & changing up the law for one’s benefit
Posted by: BrokenUSA on Aug 18, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a question regarding Constitutional law I am hoping a professional can answer:

This is encompasses Padilla;, warrentless wire tapping & changing up the law for one's benefit.

1) In the case of Padilla (regardless of guilt or innocence), he was at first labeled a "Combative Enemy" with no right to a trial, a lawyer and allowed to be totrtured to get a confession

The charges labled against him were for POTENTIALLY setting off a dirty bomb in the USA. He was held for 2-3 years like this.

When the Supreme court overruled that he was a US Citizen & US Citizens must be given a trial, Those charges were CHANGED to aiding the enemy Overseas and had nothing to do with a dirty bomb plot. (I am NOT contesting that he was found guilty)

What happens to all those years he was held illegally on (possibly..who really knows? ) trumped up charges that were changed once he had to go to a real court of law?

Can anyone be held accountable for being able to whisk any American off the street & held without a lawyer illegally?


2) In the case of warrentless wiretapping of US citizens:

First, The Attorney general said you didn't need FISA to listen to American phone calls.

Then the Upper management of the DOJ ruled that it was ILLEGAL to do so to Americans (This is what lead to Gonzoles trring to get a doped-up Ashcroft to sign off on it in the famous hospital incident). ]

He was shut down but, ON BUSHS' ORDER, they CONTINUNED to do it anyway.

Recently congressioanl idiots just gave that power back to the Administration.

What happens to all those years they were illegally wiretapping Americans ANYWAY?

Can anyone be held accountable for being able to listen in on an American phone call illegally?

IS (or Will) ANYONE EVER be able to be held accountable for acting illegally before a law is changed/redacted?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah- and he is still in office!
Posted by: vomeggido on Aug 20, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wake the fuck up people- can you see this or not?

Are you just hoping it will all work itself out? Still believe the democrats are gonna clean this shit up?

The dems pull out the brooms and dust pans just long enough for you to see they have them, then they toss them back in the supply closet and don't do shit.

If you believe in hope- you're gonna sink to the bottom of the ocean just like everyone else on the Titanic. And you will deserve to be dead at the bottom of the ocean- because it was all right there in front of your face.

You denied it and destroyed your children's chance of freedom and peace because you were too stupid to realize you were being duped- and by the time you figured it out and accepted it- it was too late.

At least die with some dignity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disappeard
Posted by: Jeanne on Aug 20, 2007 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story seems to have disappeared from the news. I guess the mine collapse in Utah has usurped its place at the top of the daily recitation. Or, maybe it's Dean whirling its way toward Mexico. Whatever the case, I guess there'll be nothing further on Gonzo until congress gets back and takes up the issue again. That is, if they remember what they were doing before their summer vacation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeach gonzales first
Posted by: whealeydj on Aug 23, 2007 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gonzales should never have been approved since he was pro torture. Democrats need to stand up to excesses of Bush admininstration and start by impeaching Gonzales first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement