Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Claws Are out for Candidates' 'First Ladies'

By Paul Harris, The Observer UK. Posted August 13, 2007.


"Puppy killer," "pole-dancer," "scheming": the spouses of America's presidential candidates are facing tough criticism and intense scrutiny as the campaign turns dirty.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Paul Harris

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It is a brutal battle of whispering campaigns, gossip-laced leaks and highly disciplined PR machines. It is a world where image outweighs reality and where any sign of weakness or an unscripted gaffe could derail a bid for the White House.

The presidential nomination process? Not exactly. Instead it is the battle royal being waged between the candidates' spouses. As the Republican and Democratic parties are both choosing presidential candidates for 2008, never before have so many potential First Ladies -- and one First Gentleman -- battled it out so publicly.

In a mirror image of the candidates' presidential race, the fight has spawned an industry of advisers, lobbyists, hangers-on, focus groups and spin doctors. It has also provided acres of column inches for an American media that seems every bit as obsessed with the future President's other half as it is with the next occupant of the Oval Office.

'What's new is that we are seeing so much coverage of the spouses so early. It is incredible," said Dr Myra Gutin, a professor of communication at Rider University, New Jersey, and author of several books on American First Ladies. "We are seeing the sort of coverage now that we would not normally see until the start of next year."

That coverage has been colorful, to say the least. It has also shown a willingness to delve into the private lives of the spouses to a remarkable degree, turning over past husbands, ancient scandals and childhood secrets. Though, it must be said, some of the spouses on the campaign trail have certainly provided a lot of ammunition.

Judith Giuliani has been the focus of most of the negative attention so far. The third wife of the Republican frontrunner and former New York Mayor, Rudy Giuliani, she was the subject of a lengthy profile in the celebrity bible Vanity Fair. The magazine, and several other articles, portrayed her as a scheming woman with extravagant shopping tastes who -- allegedly -- demanded an extra seat on the campaign plane for her Louis Vuitton shopping bag. That piece has prompted a fight back from her husband's campaign who wheeled her out to meet several carefully chosen newspapers in order to beat off some adverse coverage.

But if anyone sympathizes with Judith Giuliani it must be Jeri Thompson, the second wife of likely Republican candidate Fred Thompson. Although her husband has not yet officially joined the race, she has already found herself labeled as a blonde 'trophy wife' married to a man 24 years her senior. When a photograph emerged of Jeri wearing a low-cut dress, it prompted TV talk-show host Joe Scarborough to remark, "Do you think she works the pole?" in a reference to an exercise craze based on pole-dancing.

The tone of the coverage so far has shocked some, including the respected political columnist Kathleen Parker. "Forget asking who would want to be President. Who in her right mind would ever want to be the First Lady?" Parker said.

That is a fair question, although sometimes photo shoots in the style of gossip magazines have been encouraged by the campaigns. The Giulianis posed for Harper's Bazaar kissing like movie stars. Elsewhere Cindy McCain, the wife of Arizona Senator John McCain, treated Fox television to a tour of the McCain house while wearing a blouse with a plunging neckline that attracted many comments .


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 08, first ladies

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What about Dennis Kuninch's wife (if he has one)?
Posted by: Jkid4x on Aug 13, 2007 5:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but good thing she is not being exposed to the mainstream media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do you seldom hear about the Bushit boozing daughters,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Aug 13, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but the press attacked Bill Clinton's daughter unmercilessly? They were down right cruel. But the Bushit twins can be in a drunken stupor, boozing like their father, and it is largely ignored.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rudy's wife #2, Donna "Hangover"...
Posted by: defrag on Aug 13, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
kicked him out of Gracie Mansion when she dumped him. Despite his fearsome reputation, Rudy was enough of a wimp to go along with that. The voters of NYC were more than a bit disgusted though, since they elect a mayor, not an ex-spouse, to live in the taxpayer-owned residence.

It's fair to ask the question, if Rudy becomes prez and Judith dumps him, will she get to throw him out of the White House & live there on the taxpayers' dime? Just wondering...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Geez, what does everyone expect?
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Aug 13, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American media specializes in content-less political coverage.
Nothing new with that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What was Fred thinking?
Posted by: astockton on Aug 13, 2007 8:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Fred Thompson was already thinking about the White House when he married Jeri, it was not one of his brighter career moves. When he stands next to such a young wife, he looks old, tired and sick, and reminds everyone that he has Hodgkin's disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What was Fred thinking? Posted by: eridani
» RE: What was Fred thinking? Posted by: phatkhat
It's time for serious citizens to take control.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Aug 13, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the types of issues that will decide our elections, unless the politically aware voters, dictate the platforms of both parties, before the election. We can make both parties compete for our votes, on our issues. I believe that we are a large enough minority to swing the election to the party that will back our issues.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

other wives' names missing
Posted by: ayudame on Aug 13, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why didn't you mention Barack's wife or Gov Richardson's wife?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: other wives' names missing Posted by: teufelhunde
Media's Scorecard gets an F
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Aug 13, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that the male journalist's are so fixed on the size of the candiates wives boobs? You never hear their comments about the size of the Candiates pensis now do you? Is it because the "No Balls at all" is off limits. You guys need to grow up, do you really think the American people give a tinkers damn about any of this soap opera content, guess again, we don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is all...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Aug 13, 2007 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So LAME! These guys are vying to be in charge of this lumbering empire, the guy with his finger on the button so of course we should have among our first considerations for them getting our vote, what his wife "looks like", not what she does or who she is... As always, it's all about looks and appearance in this land, no one gives a damn about what is really important, let alone true. If the tabloids say it happened or if some right wing windbag says it's true then it MUST be, right?... give me a break!

But then again, it might be FUN to have a pole dancing first lady... sure would spice up all that Washington Biege.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Somebody asked Bill Clinton....
Posted by: morticia on Aug 13, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...what he'd be called if Hillary gets elected. He was ready. He said: "First Laddie!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Next Reality Show
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 13, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly, it is nonissues like the above that interests so much of the public. They have been so dumbed down by MSM the issues are too hard for them to understand. Meanwhile, the poles melt and the stockmarket teeters.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And how is this article ......
Posted by: Shey on Aug 18, 2007 5:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...... any different than the disgusting gossip pieces it supposedly deplores? I'm really disappointed that AlterNet would stoop to this.
There may be a legitimate way to address this issue, but this article didn't even come near being anything more than an extension of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]