Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bonds' Accomplishment Leaves Baseball a Polarized Place

By Dave Zirin, TheNation.com. Posted August 14, 2007.


Instead of sparking a serious discussion on sports, steroids, celebrity and race, the media's anti-Bonds avalanche has done baseball a grave disservice.
Advertisement

Feared Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz says there is one immutable law under his roof: "When I am home and Bonds comes up it's the house rule that no one is allowed to talk." This is the part of Barry Bonds's legacy that we won't be hearing about now that the San Francisco Giants outfielder has passed Henry Aaron to claim the most sacred statistical title in all sports: Major League Baseball's home run king.

In twenty-five years of watching baseball, Bonds is simply the greatest player I have ever seen. In the 1990s, he averaged thirty-six homers and thirty-four steals every season. At 37, in 2001, he hit a record seventy-three home runs; at 38 he batted .370 with an ungodly .582 on-base percentage; at 39 he won his sixth MVP, hitting forty-five home runs in only 390 at bats. At 40 he set a record by being the first person to have an on-base percentage over .600. He mastered the game like no modern player in any other sport save Tiger Woods and Michael Jordan.

But Bonds will leave baseball a polarized place. Games away from the friendly confines of San Francisco have become festivals of vitriol. Much of the media talk about him as if he were Barry bin Laden or, as Tom Sorensen of the Charlotte Observer called him, "OJ [Simpson] Lite."

All of this has created an open-season atmosphere at the ballpark. Seeing the nightly sports highlights of mostly white fans letting it all hang out against one of the most prominent African-American athletes in the sport has deepened the polarization. In the latest New York Times poll, African-American fans were almost twice as likely as their white counterparts to want Bonds to break Aaron's record of 755 homers; 57 percent of blacks were rooting for Bonds to break the record, versus only 29 percent of whites.

Making the journey more difficult is the man Bonds was seeking to pass: Henry Aaron. Bonds is painted as symbolic for "what's wrong in sports," while Aaron has become one of baseball's elder statesmen and living legends. Aaron made a surprise appearance on the Jumbotron Tuesday night after Bonds hit his historic blast. This surely must have confused members of the media who have used Aaron's refusal to be at the game to beat Bonds over the head.

As Jemele Hill from ESPN wrote, "Hank Aaron deserves better than to see his record broken by an unlikable, arrogant cheater who has done nothing but heighten stereotypes of Black athletes. He is unquestionably a Hall of Famer and the best player of this generation -- but he is not nearly the man Aaron is, and should not surpass him in any way."

Aaron's refusal to attend was drenched in irony. In April 1974, he broke Babe Ruth's seemingly insurmountable record by hitting his 715th home run, doing so in an atmosphere of open racism. In 1973, as he closed in on Ruth's record, the US Post Office reported that Aaron received 930,000 letters, many of them death threats. One that Aaron later said was similar to many others read, "Dear Nigger, You black animal, I hope you never live long enough to hit more home runs than the great Babe Ruth."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: race, hank aaron, home run, baseball, barry bonds

Dave Zirin is the author of "What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States." Read more of his work at Edgeofsports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Newsflash: steroids and Performance Medicine All over Sports
Posted by: notabilia on Aug 14, 2007 2:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zirin's recitation of Aaron's stoicism in the face of such nazi vitriol is sobering. As America's top athletes have continued to be drawn from the most suffering of urban communites, and the unearned riches of theft have accumulated in laps of America's rich whites, pro sports have become a spectacle of open segregation, as Zirin notes ("mostly white" fans could be changed to "almost all"). However, steroids and perverted medical interventions are suffused throughout sport at the elite level, a fact which all the billionaire white owner/overseers know and basically laugh at in their luxury boxes. Someone like Jonathan Kraft, son of the owner of the New England Patriots, should be rousted out of bed and be shown the crippled lives of his former toy athletes, and then have his billion go to the creation of decent jobs. The only other alternative is to know that cheating is inherent at this level of contest, and let the freaks go forth with light testing, as is generally the case now, but without the "innocent until proven guilty" hogwash. Jose Canseco told the truth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Professional sports are entertainment . . .
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Aug 14, 2007 3:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the real sport is to be seen in non-professional competition. personally i feel that professionals are a waste of time, effort and money. they produce nothing. sport as work? as a job? pfft. sport is not work. it may require some physical "talent" but it's not work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality check..it's a GAME!!!
Posted by: overseas on Aug 14, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I like baseball and will glance at most any sport for entertainment...but if it all ended tomorrow...that is professional sports...would the world change??? NO!!! Why?? Because it is not about raising the poor out of the ghetto, about curing AIDS, about ending the occupation in Iraq or some high moral cause...it is a GAME. Just a fucking game that teaches our children literally nothing about how to lead a good life--other than what not to do. It is sad that this game has become so warped and so polarizing. It should be fun...and it is just not fun so long as it is clouded by all this crappy hype.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't it a little racist for a white writer to...
Posted by: defrag on Aug 14, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lecture a black writer how he's all wrong about this?

By the way, the 1970s ARE a "bygone era." Most of us who lived thru it have noticed a lot of changes in society since then, and probably most readers here weren't born yet.

Bryan Burwell, an African-American sports columnist for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and MSNBC.com, writes, "Anyone who honestly thinks that Aaron is the bad guy and Bonds is the tragic victim either has absolutely no sense of American history, or is a complete idiot."

Burwell goes on to write, "Hank Aaron was a victim of America's dark soul in his 1974 pursuit of Babe Ruth's home-run mark. The hatred and resentment that Bonds is feeling now are all about the self-inflicted wounds of a cheater's out-of-control vanity and ego."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Going There
Posted by: Jarmadi on Aug 14, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article trivializes the concept of racism. For any Bonds critic to attempt to defend himself against this charge is an impossible task. The accusation is only made in order to deflect the debate and to blur the issue. It's very similar to Rush Limbaugh claiming that all these Iraq War critics just hate America. Don't fall for this, and don't waste any of your time defending yourself against such bogus BS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not Going There Posted by: DBachmozart
» Still Not There Posted by: Jarmadi
» RE: Not Going There Posted by: sterlingdave54
It's all about the attitude
Posted by: Democritus on Aug 14, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember when Ted Williams was pilloried unmercifully by the Boston sports writers for refusing to doff his cap to the fans. Yet Williams was probably the greatest hitter in baseball. Now Barry Bonds has smashed the records set by Ruth, McGuire, Sosa, and Aaron, and the sports writers and the Commissioner of Baseball are giving him a hard time. Why is that? It's not really about the unproven allegations of steroid use. It's about his attitude. He just isn't the humble role model that writers expect--someone who sings a paean to the glories of the truly American pastime. But critics should look at his accomplishments: more than 2500 walks, most of them intentional, more than 500 stolen bases--try to do that on steroids. If Bonds is able to play another couple of years he could easily crack the 800 home run barrier. Hang your collective heads in shame, critics and sports writers--and all those who could take steroids forever and never come close to doing what Bonds has done. Give credit where it's due, and that credit goes to the greatest hitter alive today--Barry Bonds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It started in the nineties...
Posted by: Trazom on Aug 14, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
at least according to my experience. Major League Baseball steroid usage exploded, not coincidentally, at the same time that the sport also saw a fantastic run-up in player salaries. Everyone knows that fans like to see home runs, so therefore the more home runs one can hit, the more fans he will draw to the park and the higher his salary will be. In 1993 I saw the first $3 million man, Kirby Puckett. Not soon after Jose Canseco topped that. Every year the top salary went up (along with the "average salary"), until we have the present, where the likes of Alex Rodrigues make $25 million per season, or Clemens makes $10,000 per pitch! With such enormous salaries at stake, is it any small wonder why the players have pursued the steroid route?

You watch some of these guys in one year, and the next they have blown up. There is no way someone adds 50-60 pounds of muscle in the offseason. Take a look at Mark McGwire before he was traded to St. Louis, or Jason Giambi in his early Oakland days. Very gawky and lanky, who suddenly put on 75 pounds! I used to collect baseball cards and I could spot the transformations from one year to the next very easily. Incidentally, McGwire used a substance that was legal at the time to gain his mass, but has now been banned by MLB. So should his records be tainted?

You start to enter a long slippery slope when you talk about tainting records or putting asterisks next to them. I don't care if Aaron needed 2,000 more at bats than Ruth to break the record, that doesn't have anything to do with the record! The record is most career home runs - period!

I must say though, that I give Aaron and Roger Maris a lot of credit. What they had to go through in breaking Ruth's records (especially Aaron) took a lot of guts and courage. Bonds did not have anywhere near that much antagonism, unless of course you count his alleged steroid use.

The bottom line is money has changed the sport, and baseball can never go back to the glory days. That is the reason why I got out of baseball cards and also stopped following the sport. At least if it ends tomorrow, my life will go on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is where the asterick belongs
Posted by: EncinoM on Aug 14, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Labeling the critics of Bonds closet racists is just pulling out the race card to protect Bonds.

Bonds is no a hero but a symbol for all that is wrong in Pro-Baseball. Aaron relied on his skill, Bonds on science to break the record.

Reading the article, you would barely get the point that Bonds was on the juice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People love a simple story
Posted by: stevepick on Aug 14, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody wants to try to explore nuance. It's much easier to simply say Barry Bonds was a cheat (and add in a half dozen other high profile players) than it is to acknowledge that most of the players who took steroids didn't actually get any better. It's easier to bitch about Bonds, who worked enormously hard, with or without steroids, to build up his body so it would perform at an advanced age (for an athlete), and who developed the skill to make sure he never swung at a bad pitch.

It's also easy to ignore the research which has shown that muscle strength doesn't affect distance of home runs, that it really is all in the wrist. It's also fun to ignore the guy who season after season built Bonds' protective arm device, and who says his arm hasn't increased in size for years.

Meanwhile, the question of racism always seems to make people uncomfortable. Most people want racism to be a simple story of obvious hatred between whites and blacks, and can't understand when the discussion points out that the vitriol pointed at Bonds just might be tainted with racism.

Meanwhile, the sportswriters have only fueled the hatred of Bonds with innuendo and a lack of respect for facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Comparison
Posted by: rubymydear on Aug 14, 2007 12:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To better understand the role race plays in the public's opposition to Bonds, compare it not to Aaron's pursuit, but to Pete Rose breaking the all-time hits record. Unlike Aaron, Pete Rose was every bit the self-centered, self-serving egotistical prick that Bonds is, was accused, and CONVICTED of cheating(although in a different way), and eventually drummed out of the game. And yet, many of the people who have it in for Barry Bonds right now, are the same people decry the travesty of Rose's banishment, and bestow victimhood upon him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HANK AARON KEEPS HIS PLACE IN BASEBALL HISTORY
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 14, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bonds had advantages before the steroids. A slightly improved baseball, better bats and smaller ballparks. All this info came form Phil Rizzuto who died just a short while ago this afternoon. Maybe we need two sets of records. before and after agreed upon dates. Maybe sometime in the 60's. As these old records are broken it's for reasons other than players being better. Conditions have also improved and made things a little easier. Just a thought. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drugs and Money
Posted by: bumiclown on Aug 14, 2007 1:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really IS about steroids(and all the other drugs). Yes, the whole Bonds issue does bring out the usual racism, but you may recall that Aarons was black. Most people I know supported Henry and do not support Bonds. Too much money and too many drugs have ruined professional sports. What about all the people who train clean? It really is unfair for them. To ignore that side of this problem borders on willful ignorance, and I have two of your books!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Drugs and Money Posted by: Afban
frank69
Posted by: frank69 on Aug 14, 2007 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just some facts about smaller ball parks. Aaron played in Milwaukee County Stadium (home), Ebbetts Field, Polo Grounds, Schibe Park, Crosley Field, Wrigley Field, and in Atlanta at Fulton County Stadium (home). ALL of these stadia were (are) small ball parks. Forbes Field in Pittsburgh was pretty big. Throw in the LA Coliseum (short left field), Seals Stadium (small minor league), Candlestick Park with an OPEN left field (no stands), Dodger Stadium. Aaron played in two Braves-Yankees World Series. So he played 7 games in Yankee Stadium. That was the old, original park, before they remodeled it and shortened the fences. Right field was short (House that Ruth built), 297 down the and 344 to the bull pen. Left field was "Death Valley," 301 down the line, but 402 to the bull pen, 457 to right center, and 467 to center. For example, the 3 monuments are now well behind the center filed fence. They used to be in center field in play, but nobody ever hit them! Anyway, for a right handed batter, Yankee Stadium was not a hitters park! And of all those small ball parks of yesteryear, only Wrigley is still around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

frank69
Posted by: frank69 on Aug 14, 2007 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aaron and small parks. I forgot to add Sportsman's Park in Saint Louis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't care
Posted by: willymack on Aug 14, 2007 6:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Bonds or anyone else takes an extract of old shoes, tree bark, and street sweepings to enhance his performance. Professional sports are nothing more or less than SHOW BUSINESS. We pay to see the athletes perform their extraordinary feats and wow us with their prowess. It's a great and harmless diversion from our deadly-dull lives, just as blockbuster movies are. The "role model" fiction of professional athletes is as unrealistic as politicans in the same situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't care Posted by: sg
are you not presumed innocent...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 15, 2007 3:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... before guilt...

even if a rival alleges in a tell all book... or another tells all before a senate hearing on the subject under threat of prison time... isn't there a presumption of innocence...

Besides their could be a thousand reasons why if he did...
but this feat is amazing no matter the perceived malfeasance!

Just my 2 cents worth...
Rock on Barry... hit another 100 or 2 and shut these idiots up once and for all!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» GET SERIOUS Posted by: bumiclown