Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

U.S. Could Trigger Deadly Middle East Arms Race

By Meena Janardhan, IPS News. Posted August 9, 2007.


The United States' plan to sell arms to Saudi Arabia and other Arab allies to counter growing Iranian influence could trigger an arms race that could set off the whole Middle East.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Meena Janardhan

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The new United States plan to sell arms to Saudi Arabia and other allies in the Middle East to counter growing Iranian influence could trigger an arms race and worsen instability in an already volatile region, say experts.

The arms deal, which still requires the approval of the Democrat-controlled U.S. Congress, is one of the biggest ever. It offers a package of 20 billion US dollars to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, 13 billion dollars to Egypt and 30 billion dollars to Israel over 10 years. Items include advanced fighter jets, smart bombs, computer systems and missile boats.

''It is an ill-advised strategic approach for geo-strategically containing Iran,'' said Steven Wright, associate professor at Qatar University. ''It is a flawed logic for Washington to see the arms sales as a means of strengthening its position against Iran and enhancing regional security.''

''Selling more arms to the Gulf countries, along with Israel, will only serve to make Iran's security concerns more acute and increase regional insecurity,'' the Doha-based specialist on Gulf-US relations wrote over e-mail. ''On the other hand, it will likely prompt Iran to devote more of its state budget towards defence expenditure.''

Supporting the anxiety about an arms race in the region are reports indicating that Russia is planning to sell 250 Sukhoi jets, including 30 of the most advanced jets it has, to Iran. Further, on Aug. 5, Iran unveiled its new fighter jet -- 'Azarakhsh' (Lightning) -- said to be modelled on the American F-5, but using indigenous technology.

The proposed aid announcement was followed by a visit to the region by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defence Secretary Robert Gates, last week.

During the visit, Rice dismissed suggestions about shifting the military balance or starting a new arms race or the military aid to the Gulf countries being a ''quid pro quo'' to get their assistance in Iraq. ''We are working with these states to fight back extremism,'' she insisted.

But Iran accused the U.S. of trying to create fear and mistrust in the Middle East and aiming to destabilise the region.

A Washington Post report went a step further suggesting that ''the United States and Iran are now facing off in a full-fledged cold war ... The Bush administration is trying to drape a kind of Green Curtain dividing the Middle East between Iran's friends and foes. The new showdown may well prove to be the most enduring legacy of the Iraq conflict.''

In its Aug. 2 editorial, the Dubai-based Gulf News said: ''Their (U.S.) purpose is clear: to raise the stakes in the threats against Iran primarily, but also Syria, Hezbollah and al Qaeda, the bete noire of the current US administration.''

However, it questioned why the GCC countries have to ''blindly follow the wishes of the US?'' Without naming the UAE, it added, ''Some GCC nations have had territorial disputes with Iran...and have deliberately avoided using the military option in the belief that the issues can be resolved through talks and mediation.''


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, arms race, middle east, united states, saudi arabia

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another Stupid Blunder by the NeoConspiracy
Posted by: AlohaTerry on Aug 9, 2007 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This move is as perplexing as selling our Ports to Dubai and a million other incompetent actions by the Ursurper Bush/Cheney/ Zionist NeoConspiracy, tantamount to trying to put a fire out by throwing a bucket of Gasoline on it. It is part of the mythical, never-ending "War on Terrrrrrer" that, like the Cold War, is a smokescreen designed to keep up the Profits of the Military Industrial Complex and Big Oil, and placating the AIPAC.
But then, when HAS the Bush MisAdministration EVER done anything that was SANE or PRODUCTIVE? I can't think of ONE time...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WTF?
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Aug 9, 2007 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are going to sell advanced weapons to the same people who cheered when their countrymen hijacked three 757s and took down the World Trade Center and 1/5th of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 - W must really be desperate for a do-over on 911 to scare the nation into voting Republican in 2008. Why don't we sell them the equipment left in Iraq when we leave next year and save the cost of shipping that crap home so we can junk it here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When will we ever learn?
Posted by: phatkhat on Aug 9, 2007 6:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember when the US armed Afghanistan because the Soviet Union was our mutual "enemy". So now we have kissed and made up with the Russians, but we have a horrible situation in Afghanistan.

I remember when the US armed Iraq because Iran was our mutual "enemy". We forgot about Iran because we decided Iraq was our enemy.

We destroyed Iraq, rediscovered Iran, and now want to arm countries (that likewise hate our guts) because we have a mutual "enemy".

Why oh why do we want to encourage an arms race among nations that would as soon stab us in the back as not? I cannot believe the stupidity, shortsightedness, and inability to learn from history that reigns in Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Seriously: vomit up the Propaganda! It ain't about what they say it is!
Posted by: Malcolm Calder on Aug 9, 2007 9:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new United States plan to sell arms to Saudi Arabia and other allies in the Middle East to counter growing Iranian influence...

''It is an ill-advised strategic approach for geo-strategically containing Iran,'' said Steven Wright, associate professor at Qatar University. ''It is a flawed logic for Washington to see the arms sales as a means of strengthening its position against Iran and enhancing regional security.''

Basic research project the Corporate Media has neglected: find out who's planning this stuff, and how their historical records enlighten their current pronouncements.

Global dominance of the World Order by America[n business/investor class].

"Full-Spectrum Dominance"

The Project for the New American Century.

Etc.

Read all about it!
(And stop using the neutral-positive "Mainstream Media" [MSM] for the Corporate media, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Waht U smokin?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 10, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could trigger? What do you mean could trigger? There has been an arms race in the middle east for decades now. Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Egypt, Iran, Syria, they're all involved. Don't you remember the Iran-Iraq war? And what about the 200,000+ guns that are "missing" in Iraq? I would consider that just one more part of the arms race. Now that everyone knows the guns are missing, everyone else has to buy more to offset the imbalance! The only thing that is surprising about any of this is that the gunmakers haven't yet outsourced to China...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Damnit! Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: Waht U smokin? Posted by: babs
What are you talking about? The arms race has already long begun !
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 10, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just that it's reaching to the point of no return. People, please stop falling behind and get your facts up to date !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're not sleeping
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 10, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a significant portion of this population that knows America has always started arm races in the World. The World of the latter half of the 20th century that is. Most of the time we're in cahoots with the countries,the arm makers and their dealers. make no bones about it,arms is big business. REALLY big business. Hundreds of millions of dollars are involved with these races.
The answer is easy. We Stop Producing,Selling and distributing Arms throughout the World. I know there's someone reading this saying to themselves' It can't be done! If we stop making gun someone else will and they will come and get us' Typical, 'I'm scared of the school bully' mind set.
Time for a new paradigm.
Maybe honesty and fair trading would be a start. Maybe even honoring our own deals,would be a better start. The biggest gripe about the US in Afghanistan is from the country People who are asking " Where is our paved roads,in house electricity,internet and flush toilets?" Seems like a pretty sim[ple request to me. If a flush toilet is enough to make a Friend,I say GIVE IT TO THEM.
The time for killing is over! Now co-operation and openness is what we need. To end the arms race in the middle east and elsewhere.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez...the only vote that counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As Usual, you folks get it completely wrong
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Aug 10, 2007 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush has no choice about the arms deal. Read the following:

http://www.sirchartsalot.com/article.php?id=65

There's a quid pro quo. The Mid-East oil princes lower the price of oil and we send them weapons. They knocked almost 8 bucks a barrel off the price, and that ain't chump change. If we want cheap oil (or at least cheaper oil), the princes are calling the tune.

Can they keep a lid on this? All it takes is one good hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico, and oil is back to $100/bl. Even I have to feel sorry for our Idiot-in-Chief. Guns for oil may end up giving him nothing but trouble and no oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

insane on the loose,
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 10, 2007 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I under stand the deals and all,saudis lower oil price we sell them more arms thing is there's got to be a check on what we agree to sell,y'know checks and balances,those things that this admin. gets rid of,well in cases like this we really need 'em,ICBM? oh sure had them since the 50's,we can sell the saudis coupla them,do they really need rockets that can carry multiples halfway 'round the planet,they might not but you know how easy things go missing over in that part of the world,We're the worlds biggest arms dealers or 2nd,lost tract,lets sell these so we can get [appropriate ]the money to build bigger, better ones!makes perfect sense to me,yep gues i had it all wrong....ARE WE NUTS?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran a threat? To WHAT?!
Posted by: FDPN on Aug 10, 2007 5:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't believe people could be so stupid as to believe that Iran of all countries is a threat to the U.S. or its interests. But then, they somehow believed that Iraq was a threat prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom, so I guess they'll believe anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hum dee dum... here we go again
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 10, 2007 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) Will the subprime collapse play a role in this decision? Injecting $20 billion in Saudi $US cash into US finance is something Wall Street would like to see.

2) Why, oh why, aren't the specific names of the potential US corporate beneficiaries listed?

General Dynamics looks to do well, for example, as does LockheedMartin Quiz: what do Lockeed and Exxon have in common? Their majority shareholder, Barclays UK.

Of course, this goes on and on and on. For a list of the key British-American players, see Transatlantic Business Groups.

3) What's remarkable is that John Edwards is calling for Congress to halt the Saudi arms sales. Notice how Edwards gets attacked and ignored by the corporate media for not supporting the US-British corporate agenda?

However,
``If there's one thing that can trump Saudi-bashing in Congress, it's Iran-bashing,'' said Henri Barkey, a former State Department policy planner who is chairman of the international relations department at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. ``The sale will go through, in part because people understand the real motivation behind it.''

The administration hasn't specified what weapons will be in the package; as a result, it isn't yet clear which defense contractors will benefit. A Pentagon official told reporters last week the Saudi deal alone would be at least $20 billion and include air and missile defense system upgrades, naval improvements and hardening the Saudis' energy infrastructure.

History suggests Barkey is right about the sale's prospects in Congress. While most such deals have been controversial -- most memorably when President Ronald Reagan proposed selling sophisticated AWACS reconnaissance planes in 1981 -- Congress has never vetoed one.


The real purpose is probably to increase US exports, and what export items other than weapons does the US produce anymore?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since Ron Paul believes in a noninternetionist foreign/military policy..
Posted by: poppop_schell on Aug 11, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there will be very restricted arms sales so that America will no longer be guilty for arming the world for more and more wars. Yes, arm sales to those people trying to overthrow depots but only in that case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barb Gantt
Posted by: ganttbarb on Aug 11, 2007 4:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By Barb Gantt

August 10, 2007 1:20 PM | Link to this

I support Tom Tancredo on bombing Mecca and Medina and on illegal immigration enforcement.

Moderate Muslims HAVE to make a stand and HAVE to become vocal as to their aborrence against the radical interpretation of the Koran. Otherwise, ALL Muslims will go down together in this “War against Terrorism”. Moderate Muslims have to decide what their interpretation of the Koran means. Moderate Muslims have to make a choice for democracy and deplomacy or for their Muslim tribal connections. This is the problem. Muslims have to make a choice.

By Barbara

August 10, 2007 2:05 PM | Link to this

Melanie Phillips Author from Britain speaks in the US to try and help America not make the same mistakes as England. The erosion of nationhood is caused by too much tolerance for immigrants that want to change America and make America morph to their ethnicity. Are you Mexican American? Or, are you American Mexican? Are you Muslim American? Or, are you American Muslim?

America’s freedom has to make some complex decisions of protectionism. The US has to quarantine radical Muslim. America can not become Islamic nor Hispanic. America’s founding was for freedom for all. And now America has to make serious choices against immigrants that do not want to assimilate.

This is why moderate Muslims have to make a choice as to radical Koran interpretation or moderate Koran interpretation. Right now Muslims want to sit on their ethnic fence at the same time they are immigrating to the US. Same as Hispanic immigrants that want to protest in the streets carrying Mexican flags.

Britain made that mistake of being too liberal with immigrant’s rights. America should not become fascist. America should become smarter.

By Barb Gantt

August 11, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this

Do you Americans really believe the U.S. can survive spending 30 Billion a month for 7 years? Should China and Japan own the U.S. through all the foreign debt extensions? Doesn’t anyone out there in America remember the depression?….H E L L O….

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barb Gantt Posted by: DCBeltway
Military industrial complex
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 12, 2007 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eisenhower's warning on leaving office was to beware the threat posed to peace and our precious democracy by the vast military industrial complex. That threat is now the dominant thread in the fabric of Amurikun improvidence. We produce more weapons than anyone else, we covert with every international undesirable known to mankind, we shun disarmament at every offering and we will trade bloodshed for economic "advancement" at every opportunity. Nukes for oil? Why not, we got plenty of the one and not enough of the other. So, as the splendid 2008 models reach tthe showroom floors, go feast on the offerings and know that the cuties that deliver the whopping success of 15 mpg (city) and 19 mpg (highway) will be powered by Saudi oil backed with the Amurikun imprimatur of its okay to possess and use desginer label nukies, as needed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]