Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why Millions of Women Don’t Vote

By Jacqueline Lee, Women's eNews. Posted August 8, 2007.


Nearly 87 years after women gained suffrage under the 19th Amendment, several factors are still keeping many of them from the polls.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Jacqueline Lee

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In "Election Day," a documentary about the experiences of voters in the 2004 election, an Ohio woman is shown having trouble casting her ballot. She had moved, and despite re-registering, went to three different poll locations because her name didn't appear on the books.

"The woman in Shaker Heights is carrying her small child in the morning and she had been getting the runaround and go-around, going from one polling place to the next," said Maggie Bowman, producer of "Election Day," released in March. "A lot of the challenges faced by working people in general are more extreme for working women."

On Aug. 26 U.S. women mark the 87th anniversary of the 19th Amendment giving them the right to vote. By some measures there is plenty to celebrate.

Women have turned out to vote at a higher rate than men since the 1980s.

In the 2006 midterm election 2 million more young women voted than in the previous comparable cycle, according to the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement at the University of Maryland School of Public Policy, which credits the rise in part to the Feminist Majority Foundation's "Get Out Her Vote" effort aimed at college women.

Moreover,55 percent of female voters cast their ballots for Democrats in House races, while only 50 percent of male voters did. In fact, female voters were responsible for key Democratic victories in the House and the Senate.

However, those figures do not reflect the fact that many women's votes are missing from the count.

In the last presidential election, 8 million women registered but did not vote; another 36 million potential female voters were not registered at all, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Faith Winter, national field director of the New York-based White House Project, a nonpartisan group working to elect a female president, says the paucity of elected women is discouraging.

"When they don't see themselves or people that look like them in the process, it's a big barrier for participation. Not seeing yourself in power is something that's particular to women." Unmarried Women Fastest Growing Group

Unmarried women are the fastest growing major demographic group and represent the largest potential group of new voters, according to "The State of Unmarried America," an annual report released on June 29 by Washington-based Women's Voices Women Vote.

But many of their votes aren't there to be counted. Of the 49.5 million single, separated, divorced or widowed women in the United States, 18 million are unregistered and 5 million are registered but don't vote.

"What would make them most likely to participate is if they have more information from sources that they trust: nonbiased, nonpartisan information," said Joe Goode, executive director of Women's Voices Women Vote. "They don't have the same social network or are not as politically engaged as married couples. The second major thing holding them back is cynicism towards politicians and politics."

Goode says the women sitting out elections are hindered in general by a high degree of instability; 40 percent of young women move every three to four years and need to re-register.

Other women may be hindered more by everyday difficulties.

"Women are voting and women are voting in high numbers every year," said Kassidy Johnson, a campus organizer for the Feminist Majority Foundation in Arlington, Va., which has a variety of programs to increase female voting. "I really believe the things that hold us back are normal, everyday things. You forget, you can't find a babysitter or you don't want to stand in line all day." Registration Challenges

Johnson points to recently married women who may not know they have to re-register if they change their names. "A woman's name does not change automatically and it costs money to change your name. You have to change your Social Security card, your voter registration card, then the roster or your license may be wrong and your name doesn't match up."

Frances Talbott-White, vice president of voter services for the League of Women Voters of Los Angeles, notes that among older people there are more frail women living in assisted living facilities or in hospitals.

"An abuse that can happen is that somebody can go to their nursing home and say, 'Let me help you with your absentee ballot,' and fill it in the way they think it ought to be filled in," Talbott-White said.

The National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum in Washington, D.C., has reported that Asian female voters face obstacles unique to their culture, as do many immigrant populations.

"For older women, a lot of it just comes from the cultural barrier, not really a stigma around voting," Priscilla Huang, the group's policy and program director, said. "Voting isn't really a part of what they did in their communities or their home countries, so it's not an ingrained process ... Women tend to rely on more English proficient family members to translate the news or tell them what is going on politically. I could imagine how this might sway or influence how they vote on things." Asian American Women Turnout Rising

However, among those Asian American women who were registered, 84 percent voted in the 2004 election and voted at a rate higher than men for the first time, according to the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey.

"In the last 2006 election, two-thirds of all first-time voters were foreign born," said Huang. "Immigrant women take voting very seriously, and they are excited to do so. So it's problematic when all the tools are not available to them."

Huang said political causes and campaigns often fail to target this group, which means they often don't feel confident enough to vote and are further marginalized.

"A good example of this is around some of the pro-choice initiatives among mainstream pro-choice groups," Huang said. "When they go out and campaign, women of color and Asian Pacific Island women in particular get left out because they may think if you're Asian, you're not pro-choice. There are no Asian voters because there's no outreach to Asian women."

A struggle still exists for married women, especially among immigrants, to vote independently of their husbands' or relatives' political views, Huang said.

Women living in domestic violence shelters or other temporary residences can be hindered from voting by fears of an abuser finding their address on public voter rolls, said Cheryl O'Donnell of the Washington-based National Network to End Domestic Violence. The organization's VotePower initiative seeks to boost domestic violence survivors' participation by educating them about safe and confidential ways to vote.

"Because of the emotional and psychological tearing down of a person, a lot of survivors don't believe that their voice matters," said O'Donnell. "So the work we're doing with voters is we're actually encouraging them to be a part of the political process and learn more about their communities and have their voices heard."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: women, voting

Jacqueline Lee is a Los-Angeles-based reporter interning with Women's eNews.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
a sad indictment
Posted by: Ames on Aug 8, 2007 12:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The low number of women participating in voting is another example of the disadvantages women face and a sad indictment on western society and democracy. Small changes, such as alternative ways to vote (by mail), provision of adequate childcare, and provision of adequate work conditions would make such a difference to many things women do to participate in society, not just voting.

The two major, simplest ways to ensure that women (in fact, everyone) can vote is to provide more venues for voting (booths, stations, whatever they're called) and to hold the vote on a saturday or sunday. Yes, people still work on weekends, there is no panacea, but these two inexpensive and very do-able measures would increase voter turnout, especially amongst women, dramatically.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: a sad indictment Posted by: Sushi
» RE: a sad indictment Posted by: jasonk
Actually these are simply reasons, NOT EXCUSES for voting.
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Aug 8, 2007 3:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all decide which hills to climb.

(I am aware there are those who the reason for not voting exist and may also excuse them from voting. This would most likely be few.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My point exactly. Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» No, not your point. Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» I did read it. Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» . . . hmm. seems we disagree. Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
voted in every election since the 80's
Posted by: mombot on Aug 8, 2007 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have 4 kids and if I had to take them with me, I did. It's not discouraged, either! Kids need to see parents vote. I usually waited for the slower time of the morning, after the initial rush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aren't women a higher percentage of the population?
Posted by: MadFlacc on Aug 8, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe that's why they've been going to the polls at a higher rate than men? Just speculating.

This shouldn't even be an issue; our elections should be structured such that every citizen has ample time to collect information about candidates, make and informed decision, and go to the polls without having to miss work or hire a babysitter. We don't just need to reform how campaigns are funded, but also how elections are handled. I don't think anyone who wants to vote should be prevented from doing so by logistical hurdles like not knowing where they're registered or where to go to vote.

I also don't think anyone who hasn't read up on the candidates and made an informed decision should vote, either. Voting is too important. Too many of us make up our minds based on a TV ad or pamphlet or a bumper sticker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am a woman, I will never vote again unless........
Posted by: TRUTHer on Aug 8, 2007 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They get rid of the Electronic vote stealing machines! The past two elections have proven that your vote does not count.
Even now, the two candidates I like the most: Kucinich and R. Paul, are kept hidden from view. All the MSM say is: Hillary is winning, Guilliani ahead for Repub.............that is mind control.
People want to vote for a winner, so all this crap about Hillary in the lead will make people vote for her. Why would anyone, vote for another war monger. We had Bush, Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Bush, and now you want another Clinton..........that would be 24 years of the same shit.
sorry, until the elections are fair, and our votes are counted, in public view.........I will not play their game. Its not what the people want, but what the government wants, and they want the person who will continue the NWO takeover.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I completely agree with you Posted by: messedup
Agreed
Posted by: Arlene on Aug 8, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ron Paul calls himself libertarian, except he believes the wombs belong to the state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Agreed Posted by: goatini
Nascent
Posted by: mommy64 on Aug 8, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paglia referenced "nascent fascism," among Republicans, called Democrats "disordered," condemned the Iraq war after supporting the invastion of Afghanistan, and severely criticized Cheney. Since those comments, nascent has bloomed unbelievably. "Gilded Age" produces huge wealth for some; for others, including male Americans, it is a living nightmare. Coupled with accelerating aggessive warfare, coupled with US sells Saudis weaponry, France sells Libya weaponry, it is accelerating madness. What are Republicans going to do about nascent fascism? Who among Democrats support nascent fascism? Who opposed the Iraq War? Where, when, why, how, and what are they going to do about it? American citizens are waiting?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The reason more women don't vote is simple and it starts with GENDER DIVIDE !
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 8, 2007 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate it when conservatives and liberals MISUSE men vs women for their personal gain !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By the way, speaking of women and politics, take a look at the female politicians and
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 8, 2007 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you'll find out that most of them, mainly the white women are the BIGGEST sellouts. All the black women so far in Congress are actually fighting for the working class voters more than anyone else in Congress. Hell, they're even fighting for the economic well being of the typical blue collar voters even if those voters end up voting Republican ! Now, that's not to say that all white women in Congress are sellouts but with ones the likes of Pelosi, Hillary, LandRUIN, etc ... and the Republican women in both chambers, it's no wonder women are just as sick and tired of politics as are us guys !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And Alternet should STOP posting articles making women look like they're the sole victims.
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 8, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're all in this hell together, men and women, so STOP feeding the gender divide and stop relegating important articles to backpage status !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen Posted by: kepstein7777
Sunday Voting
Posted by: Badger1492 on Aug 8, 2007 11:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In most European countries, voting is held on Sundays, a day when most people are off work. It would make it easier for working people, and specifically working women with children, to vote if elections were held on Sundays. Saturday is another option, but generally people have fewer activities planned on Sundays. I know, I know, the Moral Police (Religious Right) will say, "It's the Lord's day blah, blah, blah..." But common sense has to come in somewhere, doesn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sunday Voting Posted by: Moira61
» RE: Sunday Voting Posted by: fork
» RE: Sunday Voting Posted by: Badger1492
I'm torn...
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 8, 2007 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having raised three daughters which led me to become an avid women's libber, I want every voting-age female to register and participate in next year's election.

Here's where I'm torn. I'm afraid the ladies will support Slick Willie's two-faced NAFTA-backing, lobby-loving, war-mongering sidekick instead of Dennis K.

Consider the following excerpts from a CounterPunch.org article titled, “Hillary Clinton, AIPAC and Iran” by Joshua Frank (01/26/06):

AIPAC's hypocrisy is stomach-turning, to say the least. The goliath lobbying organization wants Iran to be slapped across the knuckles while the crimes of Israel continue to be ignored. And who is propping up AIPAC's hypocritical position? Senator Hillary Clinton of New York.

As the top Democratic recipient of pro-Israel funds for the 2008 election cycle thus far, pocketing over $58,000 as of October 31 last year, Senator Clinton now has Iran in her cross-hairs.

During a Hanukkah dinner speech delivered on December 11, hosted by Yeshiva University, Clinton prattled, "I held a series of meetings with Israeli officials [last summer], including the prime minister and the foreign minister and the head of the [Israeli Defense Force] to discuss such challenges we confront."

"In each of these meetings, we talked at length about the dire threat posed by the potential of a nuclear-armed Iran, not only to Israel, but also to Europe and Russia. Just this week, the new president of Iran made further outrageous comments that attacked Israel's right to exist that are simply beyond the pale of international discourse and acceptability."

"During my meeting with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, I was reminded vividly of the threats that Israel faces every hour of every day ... It became even more clear how important it is for the United States to stand with Israel ..."

As Sen. Clinton embraces Israel's violence, as well as AIPAC's duplicitous Iran position, she simultaneously ignores the hostilities inflicted upon Palestine, as numerous Palestinians have been killed during the recent shelling of the Gaza Strip. Over the past weeks Israel continues to mark the occupied territories (they call 'buffer zones') like a frothing-mouth K9 on the loose.

Hillary Clinton's silence toward Israel's brutality implies the senator will continue to support AIPAC's mission to occupy the whole of the occupied territories, as well as a war on Iran in the future. AIPAC's right -- even President Bush appears to be a little sheepish when up against Hillary "warmonger" Clinton.


End of CounterPunch extract.

If you believe Bill Clinton's flyweight understudy should NOT become president of the United States, visit the nonpartisan website: www.STOP-Hillary.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm torn... Posted by: mommy64
» RE: I'm torn... Posted by: ezilla
» RE: I'm torn... Posted by: appleton14
Why poor people don't vote-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Aug 8, 2007 5:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because the RICH have convinced them- that the system does not represent them, and does not work for them.
And Most American women -are poor.

Why on earth would a Republican encourage a poor person to vote? There are more poor people than rich people-so unless you are a REALLY stupid Republican-why would you want more poor people to vote?

Besides-the machines are all rigged. I SAW it. I was a poll watcher.

What we need-is Revolution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why poor people don't vote- Posted by: Revolutionary
» RE: Why poor people don't vote- Posted by: Aussie Kim
It's sad
Posted by: opeluboy on Aug 8, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must admit I know very few women who take politics seriously, and these are progressive, hard-working, creative and intelligent women that make up my circle of friends. But politics just doesn't seem to interest them. There seems to be a common belief that there is nothing they can do, so why get worked up about it, although they will involve themselves in specific local issues.

I think that will change when things get even worse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Is it sad or is it smart? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Is it sad or is it smart? Posted by: opeluboy
Huh?
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 8, 2007 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Millions of women don't vote, thousands of women _can't_ vote...and yet:

"Women have turned out to vote at a higher rate than men since the 1980s."

What's with that??? Sure - obviously many millions more women need to be encouraged and helped to get to the polling booth, but MORE men are not voting, so what are you going to do about them?!


(So grateful and appreciative we have compulsory voting...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huh? Posted by: WitchyNy
Civics
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 9, 2007 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We dropped teaching Civics classes in public education years ago. Civics introduced and broadened every student's understanding of who we are as a nation and why we must respond to contemporary issues in certain ways. It is now left to Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannitty, et al. to "educate" the masses and it is no wonder that women have embraced abstinence rather than active response to inanity. Until they unite and become a national force, I fear we are doomed to more Nixon, Reagan, Bush-1, Bush-lite and, worse yet, Hillary. Had they pledged their troth in the past to making this nation meaningful and better, I have to believe that the ship of state would be sailing a better course than it does today. We must do more to encourage them to participate and when it happens we can kiss right-wing lunacy goodbye.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote for whom?
Posted by: Dianka on Aug 9, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The majority of America's poor are women. Many of these have significant barriers to employment, from lack of affordable childcare to illness/disability. Statistically, few people (men or women) can handle the Superman-like demands of raising a child while working while going to college/tech school---which our social policies (specifically, welfare "reform") require---and they will remain poor

No candidate represents this vast group, so they are left with voting for the lesser of the evils. It took a Democratic president to enact the punitive, often-draconian welfare "reform" that we have today, and this tangle of policies effectively blocks off any way out of poverty.

For whom should low-income women vote? The only answer we've heard is "get a job", with candidates apparently oblivious to the many real-life complications that are tremendous barriers. Hillary Clinton played a lead role in formulating these "reform" policies. We see no alternative to policies that are based on the truly bizarre notion that poverty is a "lifestyle choice", something for which we need punitive "disincentives".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Civics teaching i encountered in grade school
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Aug 10, 2007 4:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has become that annoying voice in the back of my mind telling me to 'do something about it', as though i could make a difference. i could imagine disaffected youth, not being taught, never had their ears attuned to hear it themselves, perhaps not realizing 1 can make a difference. we give our children over to the daycare ranchers where they become cattle we move about for a few years in hopes of getting a few ribbons at the local cattle shows (school grades/graduation, organized sports 'awards'). it's easy to control beasts with a 'herd' mentality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's with the Wacko Story?
Posted by: faultroy on Aug 11, 2007 5:37 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the editors of Alternet must be smoking crack to print such a ridiculously lame story.
Look, I realize that this story was submitted by a feminist news service, but really do we really need to read some of the dipshit reasons given for not voting?
Gee, le't see, if we provided women child care, do you think that they might vote? Maybe we should hire Republicans to take out their trash for a month if they vote Democrat? Or perhaps we should give every woman a "reason" for going to the voting booth--like maybe give them a designer purse or perhaps a little "nip and tuck," with their favorite plastic surgeon? Yeah Pres, you get right on it.
Let's do the math: women represent the majority of the population according to the Census Bureau. By that same Census Bureau, there were three million more women voters than men. But how can that be? After all, we all know that it is all men's fault that women still can't vote the way they want.
Why don't millions of women vote? Umm...could it be because they don't give a shit? Naw, that can't be the reason...then we couldn't write about all the really mindless stupid reasons skirts come up with for not doing something. Leave it to a feminist to waste everyone's time with such ridiculous inane nonsense. What is it about these Alternet editors that they continue to come up with such hare brained copy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's with the Wacko Story? Posted by: appleton14
we're distracted
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 13, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by shiny objects...

or working hard to get 'em...

or working hard picking them up for other people...

or sniping about
everybody else who lives too damn close, more or less affluently... that drives us to work ourselves harder...

while the people who are supposed to love us? are being fed garbage & propaganda that tells them I'm to be valued for my possessions or looks... or stock portfolio...

Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian

"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement