Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Memo to Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton and Al Gore III: Drug Treatment Isn't a Silver Bullet

By Anthony Papa, AlterNet. Posted August 3, 2007.


It is time to treat addiction for what it is, a medical problem, not a criminal one -- even for celebrities who rely on rehab clinics to bail them out and continue driving down that road to oblivion.
Advertisement

OK, so you're rich and famous and have a drug problem. You relapse and get arrested. What do you do? It seems the latest trend in countering your likely conviction is not hiring a "dream team" of legal defenders but immediately enrolling in a rehab drug program. Lindsay Lohan, the troubled Hollywood starlet, joins a host of other high-profile celebrities, including Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie and the son of the former vice president, Al Gore III, who have adopted this novel strategy.

Lohan's pal, Paris, just did a brief stint in jail for driving with a suspended license after a previous drunk-driving arrest.

Nicole Richie recently pleaded guilty to driving under the influence from an incident where she was caught driving the wrong way down a Los Angeles freeway last year. She was sentenced to four days in jail and mandated to enter a drug and alcohol program.

Gore was recently arrested for speeding down a highway in his Prius at 100 miles per hour with a small amount of marijuana and a pocket full of different prescription pills. He pleaded guilty to two felony counts of drug possession, among others, and was allowed to enter a drug diversion program. If Gore successfully completes that program, the charges may be dropped.

The role of drugs and drug addiction loom large over these individuals' criminal cases since each enrolled in rehab quickly after their brushes with the law.

Without question, rehab is an essential tool on the road to recovery. It is a multi-tiered, long-term process that enables changes to life patterns that typically trigger the urge to get high. This requires time and effort by the participant.

Lohan was only out of rehab for two weeks when she was busted again for driving under the influence and cocaine possession. Her father, Michael, himself a former addict, was recently released after serving a two-year sentence for a drunk-driving incident. He said his daughter needs a long-term treatment plan to successfully recover from her problems with alcohol and other drugs.

Many were quick to blame the rehab center Lindsay attended, saying it failed her. But no rehab center can produce miracles in such a short period of time.

What most fail to realize is that relapse is an expected part of recovery. Treatment is valid for fighting the demons of addiction and an effective tool in overcoming the government's use of incarceration and punitive measures in response to low-level, nonviolent drug law offenses stemming from addiction.

According to Justice Department statistics, the United States holds a firm lead in maintaining the most prisoners of any country in the world -- now at 2.2 million and rising, and last year recorded the largest increase in the number of people in prisons and jails since 2000. Criminal justice experts attribute the exploding U.S. prison population to harsh sentencing laws and record numbers of drug law offenders, many of whom have substance abuse problems.

Should we treat drug addiction as a criminal matter or a medical problem? For most people, treatment is much more effective than imprisonment for breaking their addictions, yet our prisons are full of drug-addicted individuals. Nonviolent drug offenders should be given an opportunity to receive treatment, not jail time, for their drug use. This would be a more effective (not to mention much more affordable) solution for the individual and the community.

Our 30-plus-year war on drugs has stifled the open debate this country should be having about addiction and how best to deal with it. It is time to treat addiction for what it is, a medical problem, not a criminal one. Even for celebrities who rely on a trend to bail them out and continue driving down that road to oblivion.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drug treatment, celebrity, rehab

Anthony Papa is a communications specialist for the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York group working to reduce the harms of both drug misuse and drug prohibition.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Realities of treatment
Posted by: judi on Aug 3, 2007 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author is correct--we can't expect miracles from treatment. As a substance abuse counselor, what I see is that although people do relapse, treatment that is welcoming (every time someone returns), structured, and robust, can eventually lead to significant, if not total abstinence.

Brain science has taught us that drugs significantly alter brain functioning. Even with lengthy abstinence, the brain can be triggered to crave drugs. Only consistent, persistent practice of skills learned in treatment can help a person get through such powerful brain signals. In early treatment, there just isn't sufficient understanding of the profound changes a person must make to be successful. Consider--if someone suggested to you that you can no longer spend time the way you do now, you can't spend time with the people you like--perhaps even your family, you have to spend over an hour a day in treatment activities--all when you're not quite sure you want to give up something that has the promise of making you feel good or helping you forget your problems--would you rush to embrace it?

Although imprisoning people addicted to drugs and alcohol is incredibly punitive and not very helpful, court-mandated treatment is helpful. The few drug courts that exist have success in leading to changes that save lives and families. Although those mandated into treatment aren't interested in it initially, once their anger cools, they often engage and are successful. Those whot don't, eventually end up serving their time. Sitting in jail for a while is sometimes the first chance they have to really think about their situation. But if they don't receive treatment while incarcerated and aren't linked to treatment at discharge, there isn't much hope for lasting change.

Significantly more money needs to be spent on treatment in some areas of the country. This silly "war on drugs" and long prison sentences waste enormous resources that could be spent on treatment and recovering lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Realities of treatment Posted by: spacecadet
» And your point was . . . ? Posted by: hagwind
» RE: And your point was . . . ? Posted by: spacecadet
Addiction is a misleading term - get to the root cause
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 3, 2007 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The writer asked, "Should we treat drug addiction as a criminal matter or a medical problem?" Addiction itself is not a criminal matter, unlike drug dealing, driving under the influence, etc. Addiction is not a medical problem that you can cure with surgery or further medication.

What we misleadingly call addiction is actually self-medication, so the best question to ask is why people feel the need to self-medicate.

Bruce K Alexander's Rat Park experiment in the 1980s showed that lab rats given a spacious and social rat-friendly environment drank only plain water and shunned water adulterated with opiates. Not even rats want to blur good feelings! Alexander had observed that if he lived like the typical lab rat (isolated in a small cage with no activities or comforts) he would cross an electrified grid to get a hit of an opiate.

If we believe that drugs are addictive, then the problems associated with drugs are either no one's fault (drugs are compelling) or the fault of the "addict" (the person is weak-willed).

The real problem is a society which is based on winners and losers determined increasingly by accident of birth!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recovery is about more than "treatment"
Posted by: hagwind on Aug 3, 2007 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the author points out, recovery doesn't happen overnight, or in 30 days. Rehab can get the booze or drugs out of your system and point you in the right direction. The wrong direction is straight back to your old world of drinking and drugging. Chances are pretty good that you need to develop a new way of looking at yourself and your relationship to the world. That sure doesn't happen overnight, and it doesn't happen in isolation. (It's like social and political change that way.)

Great article, btw. Anthony Papa knows what he's talking about. Take what you like and leave the rest, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh c'mon!
Posted by: reidhaus on Aug 3, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not a medical problem - it is a decision making problem. These people are weak and dependent. They can't keep their lives in order and contribute in a positive way to society. That's not a medical condition but rather a condition of immaturity and basic human stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Clarification: Posted by: MadFlacc
» RE: Clarification: Posted by: reidhaus
» RE: Oh c'mon! Posted by: inverse_agonist
» RE: Oh c'mon! Posted by: reidhaus
Young in Sobriety
Posted by: dkeithley on Aug 3, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to admit that I have followed the cases the author mentions in his article rather closely. However, I'm mollified by the fact that my interest is out of concern rather than joy at a fall from grace. I sobered up at the age of 22. I was already a convicted felon facing another felonious drug charge and a DUI. I had been to a 6 month treatment program, relapsed for three days, and had arrived back in jail. When I saw Lindsay's one day of relapse take her back to the slammer, my heart went out to her.

I do a lot of work with teens in treatment, and I've come to find how disheartening the rates of recidivism are. I now look at my job with them as planting the seed. Recovery for me happened in the rooms of 12-step meetings and a therapists office. Through CBT (cognitive behavioral treatment) and the 12 steps I have been clean and sober for a little while now.

My friends and I refer to treatment as boot camp. Counselors get 30 days (typically) to indoctrinate patients with as much information as possible i.e. meetings, step work, therapy, relapse prevention. While 30 days is often sufficient time to dump this information on a patient, there is little to no time for a patient to put this information into practice in a controlled environment.

I am a huge proponent of diversion programs, and I commend the author for a well informed article. For those who believe addiction not to be a disease, please read the American Medical Association's ruling. I've watched too many die from this illness to have their memories tarnished by those who would preach willpower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Treatment works better than jail, but...
Posted by: BeeGee on Aug 3, 2007 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Studies continually show that treatment works better than jail for keeping addictions at bay -- and is a whole lot less expensive. However, when a conservative mind set is dominant, many people feel safer with addicts -- disproportiate numbers of which are black or brown -- in jail instead of being "coddled" with something that would help prevent further criminal activity. This also helps reduce unemployment rates, since those imprisoned are not counted.

On the other hand, if the Lohans, Richies, and Gores of the world were treated like the Gomezes and Washingtons, their addictions might not be cured but they'd certainly stop going out stoned without a handler. What if we started treating the Gomezes and Washingtons like the celebrities, instead!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recent headlines show treatment doesn't work!
Posted by: MakingSense on Aug 3, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If anything, recent headlines about Ms. Lohan show that treatment doesn't work. Yet, "experts" and residential programs have a huge economic incentive to maintain the illusion that it does! According to a study done at a Kansas City Veterans Hospital, addicted people who received no treatment (but were advised to quit) did better one year later than people who received extensive addicition treatment.
Addiction as a disease, the premise underlying most treatment programs, is invalid and insulting to people who are actually ill. Moreover, addicts use this premise to escape consequences (jail) for their actions. If someone kills someone while driving under the influence or steals to support their habit, they should suffer the same consequences as anyone else. Mandated "treatment" programs are constitutionally dubious since most of them are based on the pseudo religious concepts of the 12 step program. In this country, we don't make people undergo religious indoctrination. Jail may be the most effective way to get through to those who insist on abusing drugs and alcohol.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget
Posted by: russianblue1 on Aug 3, 2007 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thomas Ravenel, Republican SC millionaire treasury secretary in that list!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

recovery is possible. many questions, a few thoughts
Posted by: squinty on Aug 3, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is there a 2-tier system of “justice” – one for the rich to manipulate, another for the rest who can not afford better lawyers? Howard Zinn: “In modern times, exploitation is disguised - it is accomplished by law, which has the look of neutrality and fairness”. Many sequelae from that root to trace out!

Is “the war on drugs” a tool for the system to oppress minorities, an excuse for a police state to intervene in our lives? In my experience, only those who grew up indoctrinated in the lap of white privilege fail to see it that way. The police “protect and serve” whom exactly?!

I disagree with “relapse is an expected part of recovery”.

Semantics: Words will be defined by each person’s background. I’ve read medical literature which says that the DISEASE is characterized by relapse.

Recovery, as I have experienced and witnessed for over nine years, is characterized by complete abstinence from all drugs… And a NEW way of living. A complete change in behaviors, choices, habits, thinking and attitudes. It’s a lot of f-ing work, but more cost = more reward.

Yes, there is an inherent paradox in talking about a disease, a mental illness, and yet talking about choices. Reidhaus notes it’s a decision-making problem.

I sense an argument between genetic predisposition plus environment and free will. 2 sides of the same coin?

I bet my life on this: any addict who chooses to surrender and follow directions in recovery* will remain abstinent and find a new way to live. *by recovery I primarily think of 12 step programs, but I’d accept any people qualified by their own experience with a new way of life characterized by such principles as…
honesty,
open-mindedness,
willingness to change,
patience,
tolerance,
acceptance,
balance,
service,
compassion,
sharing,
forgiveness,
courage,
gratitude,
perseverance,
kindness,
goodwill,
hope,
trust,
faith…

Why do some “choose” to follow directions and some don’t? Perhaps the pain was not great enough yet.

Papa calls Lohan’s father a "former addict". “Recover-ing addict” is present participle – a reminder that I’m still at risk, I still need to practice those principles every day for as long as I wish to remain abstinent and enjoy a new way of life.

Country club rehabs: spend $1600 per day to find out that 12 step meetings are free! More precisely: detox is one part. Rehab – “to bring to a condition of health or useful and constructive activity” – is another.

Medically supervised detoxification is absolutely necessary! You can die from withdrawals from alcohol depending on the level of your habit.

How legal or illegal should each drug be? I have no clue. I'm not a social scientist. As far as that goes one social scientist (prof. at BU) says the social sciences are not scientific!

Apparently many people can use quite a number of drugs (Alcohol IS a drug) and live a successful, contented life.

(self-diagnostic: when did I last feel Content or Satisfied?).

There may be some spectrum of inherent hazard: I doubt there are any “social heroine users”, or “recreational crack smokers”. One key concept is “the progression of the disease”. Every addict who mentions “chipping” always eventually talks about a habit, whether it’s months or years later. See the invariable connection.

I suggest the law be concerned with one person endangering another – primarily defined physically. Running red lights is a threat to others regardless of what's in your bloodstream. Other “dangers” such as "a bad example for children” gets murky. Peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drug use is a SYMPTOM of a possible problem...
Posted by: jimidee on Aug 3, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NOT the problem. Read Dr. Andrew Weil, MD for the straight poop. Drugs are not evil, they are neutral. Drugs do not cause addiction, they are a symptom. It is all about self-medication. Some folks do have stubborn associations with drugs, true enough, but they have a pre-existing underlying problem creating emotional pain that is causing them to want to be high all the time in the first place. I am 56 years old and I have not known one person who has a drug problem that is not clinically depressed...not ONE.

When young Mr. Gore was caught with some pot and a few prescription pills in his pocket, he was not automatically impaired or DUI. Drugs could not enter his bloodstream through his pocket, despite what the laws say. My biggest surprise when I heard that he was caught driving a Prius at 100 MPH and had drugs in his possession, was that a Prius would do 100 MPH! Maybe I should rethink my initial concerns that the car was way too underpowered.

Most folks use drugs as a mini-vacation in a somewhat altered state of consciousness...and do not have a drug problem and certainly are not addicted. The conventional wisdom that has been thrust upon us by the most skilful misinformation campaign ever conducted in modern times, are fraught with lies and misconceptions, and backed up by biased science at best, and out-and-out lies at the worst. The current drug laws are not based in science, but in myth, politics, and racism.

jimidee

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're Missing the Point!!
Posted by: chasaturn on Aug 3, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question isn't whether or not drug use/addiction is a 'medicl' problem - the REAL issue is the unequal and insulting application of the laws... the rich, the celebrities, the connected get off while the poor and disinherited go to prison. Once the law is applied equally and impartially, you can bet the laws will change...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Societal problem also.....
Posted by: picket on Aug 3, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
USA largest prison population in the world.....2.2 Million humans in cages. Prisons have the same problems of society inside .....racism, rape , injustice, drug abuse, theft, emotional and physical abuse, class systems, gangs, criminal educational courses. Go to prison for a non-violent crime like MJ use and come out with a different attitude? Where is common sense? This society has more than crumbling infrastructure to worry about.

Politicians use the "tough on crime" bit when in reality they are cowards and do not look for real solutions. When a person with no connections gets 5 Years for 5 grams of crack [0.17 0z] and someone else gets 5years for 400 grams of cocaine[14.1 oz] what is the reasoning?

Use is NOT always Abuse but there is little differentiation in treatment. The prisons are full of people who did not abuse drugs and WERE productive citizens........BUT......not to mention any names ...if YOU were caught with 144 Vicoden and you did not have a RX what are the chances that treatment would be an option?

Check out [ leap.cc ] ... Law Enforcement Against Prohibition ...Citizens who have been on the front lines in this expensive, irrational WAR on People.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The 12-Step Rehab Con
Posted by: tunesmith3000 on Aug 3, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The tragedy surrounding all these celebrity addicts is compounded and made infintely worse by the fact that they are being forced into "treatment" programs that don't work. The 12-Steps DON'T WORK! AA DOES NOT WORK! AA is one of the most insidious and damaging con games that has ever been inflicted on society. For the real dirt and the real truth about A.A. read this: http://www.orange-papers.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What?
Posted by: graylegend on Aug 3, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't care that these individuals are addicts. What I care about is that after drinking and drugging they get behind a wheel. THAT is the real criminal act here. Relapse may be part of rehab, but should the rest of us have to risk our lives to share the road with spoiled jerks like Paris, Lindsay, Nicole and Al G. III? Punishment is appropriate, if we don't want to make a mockery of road safety laws. And if the response to my argument is, well, intoxication impairs their judgment so that they can't decide not to drive, then I would retort that locking them up is what's best for their own good and everyone else's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It just isn't THAT simple! Posted by: graylegend
Why hasn't rehab worked for 93% of problem drinkers?
Posted by: deby on Aug 3, 2007 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Certainly treatment is "valid for fighting the demons of addiction" - but the wrong kind may not be effective.

Addictions expert Dr. Marc F. Kern says the treatment approach may be a key part of the problem in gaining health. He says that the disease model is killing people, because it is stopping many people from getting the alcohol and drug help they need, and would really work for them. He thinks the disease model of addiction embraced by most of the medical community scares people, and ignores effective alternatives.

"We have a time warp in the practice of addiction medicine in this county," Dr. Kern says. "The root of why people aren't getting help is the shame, blame, uniformity, and religious overtones of the standard treatment, and physicians 'diseasing' the problem."

Continued in article: Why Hasn't Alcohol Rehab Worked for Lindsay Lohan and 93% of Problem Drinkers in U.S.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prison industry
Posted by: BlueTigress on Aug 3, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also, part of jailing addicts comes from the for-profit prison industry that's part of the conservatives push to privatize everything.

If your jail stands empty because addicts are going into diversion programs that might help them not re-offend, you're losing money. The answer: lobby for long jail sentences for everything.

'Tough on crime!'

I agree that using drugs or drinking excessively should not be a legal issue until it causes the person to break an existing law. Also, we as a society need to look at why the idea that getting wasted is the only way to have fun is so deeply entrenched in our consciousness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prison industry Posted by: billdake@sbcglobal.net
IT'S SAD.......
Posted by: gellero on Aug 3, 2007 8:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That so many AlterNeters would identify with the opressor class that has catagorized a personal choice of another reality as 'bad' or 'addicted'. It is sad that those who identify themselves as 'progressives' are so reactionary when it suits their biases.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT'S SAD....... Posted by: realmuzik
a few observations...
Posted by: irmelle on Aug 3, 2007 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i went to a 30-day inpatient program and from there had a 9-month stint at long-term treatment. that began in november 2005. i'm still clean today.
the sad fact about addiction that i am completely sure of--whatever doctors or whoever says-- and that most people in AA agree with (AA being the program that works the best for most people), is this...
we (addicts/alcoholics) don't quit until we've had enough. for most people, they never have enough and die.
i went into inpatient sick and tired of being sick and tired, and i was ready to do ANYTHING to quit. my rock bottom wasn't as bad as others', and was worse than others'...everyone is different. i offer no solutions to this, i only wish to comment that addiction has always existed, ever since humans discovered the narcotic properties of ____; be that alcohol, opiates, etc. the question we should ask ourselves is not "is addiction a medical or criminal problem?", it is: "what is it about our society that has caused millions to have this problem?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the "WAR on DRUGS" is the reality...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 3, 2007 10:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
of this treatment...

absolutely disgusting that an individuals right to choose is either to choose treatment or jail... some choice...

don't get me wrong, alcoholism is the saddest addiction I've ever had to witness next to heroin and cigarettes but Hemp, isn't an addictive substance... and my proof to this is simple...

stick a pot head in a room and cut off his pot for a week... and watch the reaction... then do the same to an alcoholic, heroin or tobacco addict and observe the reactions on them...

You will kill the alcoholic and heroin addicts simply by not weaning them off slowly as the physical withdrawals are noticeable and painful to watch.
The tobacco addict will be highly agitated for a few days but will calm down... but will just go to the nearest store and get his fix immediately once the week is done as the long term addiction to tobacco is insidious and very hard to break.

Whereas you wont notice any discernable differences or concerns with the pothead.

90%... of drug abuse is pot, which is the benign drug out there with multiple medical uses and the most incarcerations with life changing implications... it isn't addictive no matter what people say and stopping to use it causes no noticeable effects.

Just think about the statistics of how a simple choice can ruin a persons life not because of the substance itself but because of a free societies stigma that it attaches a upon it!
It's a disgusting display of freedom you seem to enjoy and export!...
I will never be a party to it... its prohibition is contrary to constitutional guarantees on religion, medicine and the pursuit of life liberty and happiness...

the real crime in pot prohibition is the artificial inflationary effects that prohibition causes for a commonly grown weed... think about it... the cost for an ounce of this weed is over 300$... and can be grown for... nuthing... disgusting how the rich can manipulate the law to there own advantages huh

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paris & Lindsy invited to Run away from their drug problems.
Posted by: billdake@sbcglobal.net on Aug 4, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
July 4, 2008 the Freedom Road Runs & Walks in SF to end the War on Drugs. Paris and Lindsy as well as anyone having a brain who understands the misery that this faied policy causes should put on their running shoes and support Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.

LEAP supports smart alternatives that heal, not stupid and heartless punishment that destroys. Mark you calendar for this event and visit People Events.org for entry as the date approaches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ITS ALL A BIG FAT CON JOB
Posted by: Darrell Kern on Aug 5, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The treatment industry is nothing more than a huge front for AA (with few exceptions like The Meadows). AA has proven to be ineffective with over 90% of its members relapsing- which AA's convenient response is "Relapse is part of recovery". AA has an answer for everything!

I used to belong to AA and while there are many benefits- there are also many drawbacks. Again, like all help- you have to want to quit in order to quit. Most AA's think its just the booze and drugs and they are extremely judgmental and very well known for slamming child abuse and labeling it but another excuse to drink.

There are many reasons why people escape into the world of addiction. If this world was not such a fucked up evil place there would be little need for constant imbibing.

What is worse is sending in the cops and the courts to deal with a spiritual problem- in fact its insanity. The U.S. Supreme court ruled that AA is a religious program and therefore it is now unconstitutional and illegal for courts to send people to AA- so now they send people to rehab- rehab in turn fronts for AA- Rehab is a multi-billion dollar a year business. Making money off of sick people is and likely will always be big business- which is why it falls short of any kind of real recovery. This is another reason its terribly heart-breaking.

The only way to win the battle of addiction is through soul searching and making a decision to stop and it doesn't matter who you are or where you come from or what you do for a living. When you make a choice for your life to move in a certain direction- well that's the only way- not everyone needs to spend $50,000.00 to achieve this goal- but rehab will convince you otherwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Special Treatment for Hollywood So-Called Stars
Posted by: starz6 on Aug 5, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich and famous are given a slap on the wrist for their bad
behavior such as driving while under the influence of all types of drugs and other substances while, other everyday citizen's are
penalized to the full extent of the law and serve major sentences
for the same crimes. I say that equality should apply to all even
the rich give them some hard time and stop this blatant special
treatment and poor sob stories Poor Little rich Lohan and Hilton their just trying to find their way, that's just a Load of Bull ****
for a get out of jail free card.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why I don't DARE
Posted by: peachmcd on Aug 7, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the US, with our Puritanical base culture, there is no such thing as 'use' of anything that is connected with pleasure. The choices we are given are abstinence and abuse. So we have a society marked by rampant abuse, and addiction to pleasures of all sorts.

As kids in the sixties, my friends and I saw all the scary drug horror stories Art Linkletter &c could pump out, and found out very quickly that they were full of false info. We went out and got first hand info. Some of us got addicted. Some of us died. Most of us enjoyed recreational use of various substances (which I now forego because the folks dealing them are such slime).

Instead of the bogus 'drug education' programs that have proven to fail at keeping kids from experimenting, I'd love to see a required 7th grade science unit called, "Addiction" with an independent but required small-group discussion component allowing pre-teens to explore all the ways they were already addicted, and what it costs them in terms of health, personal integrity, and money.

The brain is an amazing, fascinating organ. The class I imagine would have 7th graders on the edge of their seats. Doing experiments like trying to stop eating sugar or watching TV and keeping a journal about how that affected them. The problem is that corporate America is heavily invested in addiction, and would rather we didn't make the connection between our TV evenings and heroin. So our corporate-sponsored school systems will never allow this to happen without a curriculum they control.

Ironically, the most possible venue for this curriculum could be a church (mosque...synagogue...) setting, including a discussion of addiction as a form of idolatry. But it would be best to get it into the public schools.

If kids had a society that recognized the difference between use of life's pleasures and abuse, and the info they needed to discern that difference, even teens could recognize signs of incipient dependence and know where to get help before it became criminal or tragic. But profits would suffer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]