Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Is George Bush Restarting Latin America's 'Dirty Wars'?

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted August 31, 2007.


Signs are emerging of a new wave of U.S.-backed militarism in Latin America.
paraguay
paraguay tank

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Benjamin Dangl

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Two soldiers in Paraguay stand in front of a camera. One of them holds an automatic weapon. John Lennon's "Imagine" plays in the background. This Orwellian juxtaposition of war and peace is from a new video posted online by U.S. soldiers stationed in Paraguay. The video footage and other military activity in this heart of the continent represent a new wave of U.S.-backed militarism in Latin America.

It's a reprise of a familiar tune. In the 1970s and 1980s, Paraguay's longtime dictator, Gen. Alfredo Stroessner, collaborated with the region's other dictators through Operation Condor, which used kidnapping, torture and murder to squash dissent and political opponents. Stroessner's human rights record was so bad that even Ronald Reagan distanced himself from the leader. Carrying on this infamous legacy, Paraguay now illustrates four new characteristics of Latin America's right-wing militarism: joint exercises with the U.S. military in counterinsurgency training, monitoring potential dissidents and social organizations, the use of private mercenaries for security and the criminalization of social protest through "anti-terrorism" tactics and legislation.

In May of 2005, the Paraguayan Senate voted to allow U.S. troops to operate in Paraguay with total immunity. Washington had threatened to cut off millions in aid to the country if Paraguay did not grant the U.S. troops entry. In July of 2005 hundreds of U.S. soldiers arrived in the country, and Washington's funding for counterterrorism efforts in Paraguay doubled. The U.S. troops conducted various operations and joint training exercises with Paraguayan forces, including so-called Medical Readiness Training Exercises (MEDRETEs). Orlando Castillo, a military policy expert at the human rights rights organization Servicio, Paz y Justicia in Asunción, Paraguay, says the MEDRETEs were "observation" operations aimed at developing "a type of map that identifies not just the natural resources in the area, but also the social organizations and leaders of different communities."

Castillo, in his cool Asunción office, with the standard Paraguayan herbal tea, tereré in his hand, said these operations marked a shift in U.S. military strategy. "The kind of training that used to just happen at the School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia, is now decentralized," he explained. "The U.S. military is now establishing new mechanisms of cooperation and training with armed forces." Combined efforts, such as MEDRETEs, are part of this agenda. "It is a way to remain present, while maintaining a broad reach throughout the Americas." Castillo said this new wave of militarism is aimed at considering internal populations as potential enemies and preventing insurgent leftists from coming to power.

Bruce Kleiner of the U.S. Embassy in Paraguay said that the MEDRETEs "provide humanitarian service to some of Paraguay's most disadvantaged citizens." But this video by Captain William Johnson shows that there's more to the MEDRETE operations, with local Paraguayans being questioned as they receive treatment, as well as events and ceremonies aimed at strengthening ties between the military personnel of both countries. Often, heavily armed men are seen walking past lines of local families while they wait for medicine and questions. The lighthearted depiction of these joint military operations seen in the video is in sharp contrast with reports from local citizens.

A group of representatives from human rights organizations and universities from all over the world, including the Madres de la Plaza de Mayo in Argentina and a group from the University of Toulouse, France, traveled to Paraguay last July as part of the Campaign for the Demilitarization of the Americas (CADA) to observe and report on the repression going on in the country linked to the presence of U.S. troops. The local citizens they interviewed said they were not told what medications they were given during the U.S. MEDRETEs. Patients said they were often given the same treatments regardless of their illness. In some cases, the medicine produced hemorrhages and abortions. When the medical treatment took place, patients reported that they were asked if they belonged to any kind of labor or social organization. Among the leaders of such organizations, dozens have been disappeared and tortured in recent years, just as they were during Latin America's "dirty wars" in the Reagan era.

While Orlando Castillo is adamant that the historic military links between Paraguay and the United States remain strong, the U.S. troops that arrived in 2005 have reportedly left the country. In December 2006, the Paraguayan Senate and executive branch, responding to pressure from neighboring countries, voted to end the troops' immunity. Paraguay would have been excluded from the lucrative regional trade bloc of Mercosur if it continued to grant immunity to U.S. forces.

Privatizing repression

Castillo sees private mercenaries, or paramilitaries, as another key piece of the new militarism puzzle. In Paraguay, the strongest paramilitary group is the Citizens Guard. "These paramilitary groups are made of people from the community. They establish curfews and rules of conduct, and monitor the activity of the community. They also intervene in family disputes and can kick people out of the community or off land ... this all very similar to the paramilitary activities in Colombia." Castillo said that while this activity is illegal, the police and judges simply look the other way. Many of the paramilitaries are connected to large agribusinesses and landowners and have been linked to increased repression of small farming families that have resisted the expansion of the soy industry, a cash-crop mostly for export. The shadow army of the Citizens Guard is as big as the state security forces: These paramilitary groups have nearly 22,000 members, while the Paraguayan police force is only 9,000 strong and the military has 13,000 members.

The use of private security is on the rise throughout the Americas. Journalist Cyril Mychalejko reported that the Bush administration was recently incriminated in a scandal involving Chiquita Brands International Inc. and their funding of paramilitaries to repress a discontented labor force in Colombia. The paramilitary group, the United Self-Defense Force of Colombia (AUC) is designated by the State Department as a terrorist organization. In 2003, a former executive at Chiquita told Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff that they were paying the paramilitary group. Chertoff looked the other way, allowing the company to pay an additional $134,000 to the AUC throughout that year.

Castillo's comments about the new U.S. military strategy for the region apply to all of Latin America. Carrying on the legacy of the School of the Americas, the International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) was recently opened in El Salvador, where similar training is going on to broaden the military's reach in the area.

Exporting the "War on Terror"

Anti-terrorism rhetoric and legislation is being mixed into this deadly cocktail in Paraguay, as it is across Latin America. The Paraguayan Senate is scheduled to pass an anti-terrorism law that will criminalize social protest and establish penalties of up to 40 years in prison for participating in such activities. A large march against the passage of the law took place in the country's capital on July 26.

The U.S.-based corporate media plays a part in what has become a war against labor movements and leftist politicians. Ciudad del Este, Paraguay, has regularly been portrayed in the American media as a haven and training ground for Middle Eastern terrorist organizations. Regional analysts believe this terrifying narrative has aided the Pentagon in its military plans for the country. Terrorism talk is similarly being used for political purposes elsewhere in Latin America. The U.S.A Patriot Act was used to revoke the U.S. travel visa for Bolivian human rights leader and labor organizer Leonilda Zurita shortly after leftist president Evo Morales came to power.

In Venezuela's national divide between pro- and anti-Chavez citizens, everything is political. CNN recently entered the fray when it aired footage that Venezuelan governmental officials said falsely linked Chavez to Al-Qaeda. The Venezuelan government has filed charges against CNN for the act. Information Minister William Lara said CNN showed photos of Chavez alongside those of an Al-Qaeda leader. He explained that "CNN broadcast a lie which linked President Chavez to violence and murder." CNN denied having "any intention of associating President Chavez with al Qaeda …"

In Nicaragua, the media has recently been used as a tool by Washington to promote its foreign policy agenda. A long time lab rat for U.S. imperialism, Nicaragua is the poorest country in Central America and the site of a socialist revolution in the 1980s when the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza dictatorship. The specter of a Sandinista-led government still haunts the White House. In a 2001 presidential election in Nicaragua when Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega was running for re-election, (right after 9/11) similar tactics were employed, and the media was a key tool. In an ad in the Nicaraguan paper La Prensa, Jeb Bush was quoted as saying: "Daniel Ortega is an enemy of everything the United States represents. Further, he is a friend of our enemies. Ortega has a relationship of more than 30 years with states and individuals who shelter and condone international terrorism." The tactic worked, and the pro-free market, right-wing Washington ally Enrique Bolaños beat Ortega. In the lead up to the presidential election on Nov. 5, 2006, former U.S. Lt. Col. Oliver North visited Nicaragua to warn voters not to elect Daniel Ortega. In the 1980s North was convicted of violating U.S. law to organize the Contra guerrillas against the Sandinista government. North reminded voters that the same terror could return to Nicaragua under a new Ortega administration. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., threatened another trade embargo and to prevent money sent from Nicaraguans in the United States from reaching their families at home. U.S. Ambassador to Nicaragua, Paul Trivelli said that if Ortega won the elections, the United States would "re-evaluate relations" with the country. The media was used against Ortega as well, with TV commercials showing corpses from the Contra war in the 1980s, warning citizens against voting for the left's choice. This time, however, the media campaign backfired, and Ortega won the election.

Paraguayan journalist Marco Castillo shook as head while contemplating this new landscape of repression. Dozens of social organization leaders and dissidents have been disappeared and tortured in recent years. "Impunity reigns," he said. "This is as bad as it was during the worst years of the Stroessner dictatorship."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, right-wingers, latin america, paraguay, militaris

Benjamin Dangl won a 2007 Project Censored Award for his coverage of U.S. military operations in Paraguay. He is the author of The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia (AK Press, 2007).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
98,000 acres in Paraguay
Posted by: chomsky on Aug 31, 2007 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many sources on the web, around Oct 2006, talked about the alledged purchase of 98,000 acres in Paraguay by Bush (maybe using Jenna's visit) and the deployment of hundreds of special forces there...
A military base?
A secret lair?
You may google it for more info...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 98,000 acres in Paraguay Posted by: Salvapath
» And did you... Posted by: bob t
two visions and two realities?
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 31, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Decent people are happy to live and let live. People who are social predators relentlessly look for ways to increase their power (human suffering, what's that?).

The predators need their way of life to seem natural and inevitable, hence the need to destabilize as many parts of the world as possible.

They must really be frustrated by countries like Sweden, Denmark and Norway which show that "live and let live" (or even "I am my brother's keeper") government is not some "commie" fantasy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just remember this,
Posted by: paschn on Aug 31, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
any US troops, ( lackeys ), caught murdering, raping, stealing in South or Central America are subject to the same treatment as prisoners caught by the group of heroes in Iraq. I guess an ironic insert here could read what goes around comes around. Our government is owned and is fed a high protein diet by their corporate handlers and "our boys" seem to be willing to risk death to come home and be worshipped by the drones here regardless of their "heroic" deeds. The Evil Empire has tortured almost 40, ( that we KNOW of ) human beings to death for their twin gods Georgie and Dickie and it's really gonna suck to be them if they're caught and treated as they've treated others in their custody.
Life's a bitch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hemorrhages and abortions?
Posted by: halrivers on Aug 31, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was a good overall article about the the sometimes sinister role the US has played in Latin America. The report that U. S. military medical cooperation programs were being used as a cover for intelligence was particularly troubling. However, the assertion that drugs given to patients produced hemorrhages and abortions undermines the credibility of the article. Such an assertion is a very serious charge. It seems more of the nature of a rumor and should not be included without better documentation. Why would medical professionals provide such sloppy or even malicious medical services if they wanted to continue to collect information? Can the author clarify?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cargill-Monsanto-US government connections explain a lot
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 31, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are farmers in regions like Paraguay being pressured to use pesticides and grow soy for export, instead of producing a variety of crops for local consumption using organic farming methods?

See Cargill/Monsanto: Diagram of Joint Ventures and Strategic Alliances

Monsanto is a prime pesticide producer. Here are some of Monsanto's board members:

Mickey Kantor US Secretary of Commerce 1996-97
William Ruckelshaus Two-time EPA administrator
Robert J. Stevens CEO of Lockheed Martin
Stansfield Turner CIA Director, 1977-81

This is just standard imperial colonialism in action. The Irish were treated the same way by the British (The Irish Potato Famine was due to export of Irish crops by British imperialists). The Old South and Caribbean slave plantations were the models that Cargill and Monsanto and the IMF/World Bank system based their South American strategy on.

Quit buying their products!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

horrors to come
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Aug 31, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we know the base from which the next terrorist attack on the USA is likely to be launched - Paraguay, supplying Bush & Cheney with the excuse they need for total dictatorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Restart? We Never Left!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 31, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
South of the Rio Grande has always been an interest of the Government. Whether aiding in the killing of Indians of deposing a Government,the US has been there. Why? Great Wealth in the ground. The region as a whole is mildy underdeveloped and the leaders,in some cases,can be bribed.
The system is old as the hills. Go in and get a few folks bickering,then they get angry,then they start killing. We sell them the weapons,give them tactical information all around then l;et the feathers fly. Then we move in. On the down low.
We deal with the folks that love money. Bribe and conive with whomever to get at what's under the ground. The government has for generations known there's gold in them thar hills. We just could'nt come up with a grand enough scheme to get at it. So we settled for low intensity conflict. That's where you tell folks how to kill off eachother without getting any of your guys killed plus you get to sell them all the toys,CASH!! This article only proves out the 'Business as usual' the gov't still engages in. The same kind of shit that got us 9-11'd. To our gov't,us and anyone else in the World as well as their resource wealth, belongs to them,by virtue of superior greed,and as such are expendable for the cause of profit.
The goal is to get at the underground riches but if we have to carry out a small war in the process,we sub-contract the job out and play the game.
The subsidizing of these 'samll scale,low intensity conflicts' is part of the reason they call us 'The Great Satan'. The costs of doing this could pay for Healthcare for all our citizens. We could use the money to make Industrial Production environmentally inert.We are'nt. We're using it to manifest a destiny for our grandchildren that will end up creating another 9-11, Pearl Harbor,a Wounded Knee. I think we could use the money better elsewhere. Think Outside the System!
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez
www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All of our hands are covered in south-of-the-border blood.
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 31, 2007 3:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the message of Cuba. The reason we do not have normalized relations with Cuba is because they are an example of what a country can do when the US is treated as an equal, not allowed to be a slave master.

The US quality of life is subsidized by the suffering of those below the border who are still oppressed by their old local masters who work for the US running their slave gangs. That's why the promise of the future is represented by China and no longer by the US.

Make no mistake. I only know what I read and I hear. South of the border is coming to get us, if we do not behave in a more humane fashion. Read "Planet of Slums" about how the major cities there and throughout the Third World are becoming bombs whose fuses get shorter every day.

People will not suffer endlessly. Economic slavery is no more sustainable than is plantation slavery. So they are turning us into addicts, just like the Brits did to the Chinese 200 years ago. History does repeat itself when a people refuse to learn the lessons history teaches. Exploitation is a dead end. When it ends, we-the-people will be dead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any doubters about our intentions?
Posted by: snax on Aug 31, 2007 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article. It inspired me to research the history of the Paraguay governement back to the construction of the Itaipu Dam project.

I'll just say that for anybody who has doubts that the US is up to no good there, follow the political trail of the presidency back to that time and connect the dots. This is about more than just exports, mining, and labor. Itaipu is the holy grail of energy in the region and you can bet that there is dirty US money behind it and the current Colorado Party regime.

The coporatocracy is not interested in destabilizing the region beyond it being the means to the end of controlling the flow of wealth from South American resources to exploitive US international empire controlling conglomerates and the people who operate them. It's a sickening mess to be sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush and Rev. Moon's vacation property/South America
Posted by: lenox on Aug 31, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is where the criminals are going to flee to. And the military base is already there. Yes, a U.S. military base, kept secret until photos were released.

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/spingola/061206

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where can I find this in Spanish?
Posted by: rgermano on Aug 31, 2007 6:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to find this article in Spanish, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

United States Has No Plans for Military Base in Paraguay
Posted by: michael098762001 on Aug 31, 2007 10:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FWIW.

> You Are In: USINFO > Resource Tools > Identifying Misinformation > Identifying Misinformation archive

United States Has No Plans for Military Base in Paraguay
Misunderstandings arose from agreement on military exercises

Washington -- Since June 2005, a myth has developed falsely claiming that the United States plans to establish a military base in Paraguay.

This false claim has been reported by media in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay and on the Internet. A June 13, 2005, article in the Argentine newspaper Clarin, which appears to be the origin of the story, quoted sources as saying that the United States wanted to turn Paraguay into a “second Panama for their troops.”

No U.S. Intention to Establish Military Base

The United States does not have a military base in Paraguay and has no plans to establish one. The United States has not asked the Paraguayan government for a military base, nor does it intend to station soldiers in Paraguay. As explained below, limited, short-term deployments of U.S. military personnel are scheduled to take place for a series of joint exercises with the Paraguayan military between July 2005 and December 2006. Most personnel deployed will not remain in Paraguay for more than 45 days.

Paraguayan President Nicanor Duarte firmly denied that there would be any U.S. base in his country, in August 2005:

In Paraguay, there will be no U.S. military base or any facility of that kind whatsoever because we're a sovereign country, we're part of Mercosur [Southern Cone trade bloc] and we want, above all, the stability of democracy.

Mariscal Estigarribia Airport Built by Paraguayans, not Americans

The “U.S. base” allegations usually cite the Dr. Luis Maria Argana International Airport in Mariscal Estigarribia, Paraguay, as the facility around which U.S. plans allegedly center. The claims are that Americans constructed the airport, and built a long runway in order to facilitate U.S. military flights. Both claims are false.

In September 2005, Colonel Elio Antonio Flores, the spokesman for the Paraguayan military, stated that Paraguayan military engineers constructed the airport between 1977 and 1986, not the United States.

The Mariscal Estigarribia airport was constructed at a time when the Paraguayan government envisioned developing a free-trade zone in its northern Chaco region to help develop the area. The primary cargo aircraft of that era, the DC-8 and Boeing 707, needed very long runways to take off when fully loaded.

Airport Unsuitable for Most U.S. Military Aircraft

The June 13, 2005, Clarin article claimed that American “B-52 airplanes” could be used at Mariscal Estigarribia. In reality, the runways are too narrow for them. B-52s typically need a runway width of 150 feet (46 meters) to land and re-engined models will require a runway width of 175 feet (53 meters), according to a June 2004 report (page 28) of the U.S. Defense Science Board Task Force on B-52 Re-Engining. However, the runways at Mariscal Estigarribia are only 131 feet (40 meters) wide.

The airport’s numerous deficiencies also make it impractical to use. It has no published approach, no navigational aids, no lighting, its refueling facilities are only designed for small aircraft such as Cessnas, and the condition of the runway is listed as “poor” in the U.S. Air Mobility Command Airfield Suitability Report. In addition, there is not enough room on the small parking apron to have sufficient clearance from the runway for another aircraft to land. Because of these limiting factors, the government of Paraguay restricts the airfield to emergency use only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Common sense from Zinn... Posted by: sphoenix
How do you find the truth?
Posted by: rgermano on Sep 1, 2007 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you find the truth about these things? A couple of years ago I went with two friends with US passports to the Posadas - Encarnación border crossing. We found they couldn't enter Paraguay without a visa. I wondered outloud why Paraguay would require a visa of US citizens. The immigration agent on the Paraguayan side told me as an aside, "It's their (the US) government that has asked us to do this." This seemed so puzzling to me! In Brasil's case it was retaliation, but Paraguay?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How do you find the truth? Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» Mountainous? Posted by: rgermano
Smedley Butler
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 4, 2007 3:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Retired Marine General Smedley Butler said it all: "I was used to protect monied interests in Central America and the Caribbean." The monied interests are US corporations. The US prefers "strongmen" to representatives of the people. Always has. However, this time, the US government is much more inept than it has ever been!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement