COMMENTS: 79
In Violation of Federal Law, Ohio's 2004 Presidential Election Records Are Destroyed or Missing
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Libertine on Jul 30, 2007 12:43 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We need that computer voting now. Then we 'dont need no stinking records'
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Once again Albrecht is wrong and uninformed.
Posted by: Ellie1
» Why No "Surprise"? Perhaps It's the Utterly Pathetic Predictability of It All...
Posted by: grumble-bum
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hayduke1 on Jul 30, 2007 12:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the entire party should be relegated to the same dust bin as the Nazi party.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: corrupt to the core
Posted by: Spot
» RE: corrupt to the core
Posted by: rockstrigoi
» RE: corrupt to the core
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: danmonte on Jul 30, 2007 1:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 30, 2007 10:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
plur
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ohio
Posted by: reval
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nor cal surfer on Jul 30, 2007 2:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hot karlrove on Jul 30, 2007 2:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else would you call a place where the voice of the people is supressed and elections are rigged?
What about a place where the mainstream media is a tool of the elite that own all?
Remember even Stalin's Russia had folks that would make up flyers yet that was not evidence of freedom.
What about a place where the ruling elite ignore the founding legal documents for the republic?
What about a place where your future is guaranteed to be worse if kept on the same path?
What about a place where the owning elites are activley arming via mercenaries ( Blackwater) to protect themselves form the onslaught of poor once the bubble bursts?
What about a place where any rights left are a sham and not absolute. The rights can ( and are) be taken away.
It's right here right now. 2008 will not change anything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: IP Democracy USA
Posted by: Solar Wind
» You can't run far enough to get away from their agenda.
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: socrates2 on Jul 30, 2007 2:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where I come from, where (and when) the will of a majority is killed/destroyed/sabotaged, that translates into treason against OUR Constitution. Pure and simple.
I am against the death penalty. So that leaves 25-to-life in prison for all convicted parties, conspirators and non-conspirators alike...
Instead, our elected officials have so little regard for our Constitutional WILL that the unholy offense of tampering with the vote becomes a simple felony or misdemeanor. That is all these white collar bureaucrats get IF AND WHEN they get prosecuted and convicted for this sacrilege against our popular will ("voice of the people, voice of god"). Recall: Most of the officials entrusted to protect the sanctity of the vote are either elected of appointed--ergo, politically well-connected...
So dollars to doughnuts the local prosecutors will tend to over-scrutinize the evidence before opting to charge these "pillars of the community." Compare them to true innocents charged with murder, rape or burglary who--before DNA evidence--were convicted on someone's flimsy "identification."
Today, with the evidence of vote-tampering "destroyed," the local DA may say, "Well, folks, I don't believe a jury of peers will vote to convict 12-0 on such flimsy evidence, so I won't file charges. End of story.
We need an authentic historical narrative that instills in the voter (citizen and juror) a true appreciation for the value and sanctity of their vote, only then can the juries appreciate the treasonous magnitude of the crime committed against the Constitution, the Republic and against the public will.
"Reader's Digest" and M.A.D.D. did it for DUI's and movies-of-the-week did it for sexual abusers, wife-beaters and other ethical lapsers. So let's educate ourselves, folks.
And let the criminals pay for treason. Treason, I say. Because when your political will and mine are relegated to the trash-heap by some corrupt official, there can be no other name for it--at least in a Constitutional democracy....
Good luck.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Treason indeed...
Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Treason indeed...
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Treason indeed...Personally I favor fair trials - and a lot of rope
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» If you're gonna commit treason, you better own the Supreme Court. They do?
Posted by: Sojourner
» "Treason" == Bullstchit!
Posted by: BenCaxton12
» RE: Elaborate on "Constitutional Treason" if you will
Posted by: channing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayenta on Jul 30, 2007 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on Jul 30, 2007 3:57 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 30, 2007 6:23 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bamboozled on Jul 30, 2007 11:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were in charge of my county's election results, I'd personally deliver them, with as many witnesses from all major parties as possible, to a safe-deposit box.
You're telling me not only did they not protect these records, they DESTROYED THEM? That's not only criminal behavior, but TREASONOUS behavior.
Secondly, we need to have Election Day be a national paid holiday. It works in other countries, and it would completely change the country. Period.
Thirdly, we need hand-counted paper ballots. It's obvious from the hacking report that came out today, not to mention the horrific discrepancies in Ohio, WE NEED RECORDS.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: National Vote Holiday, Paper Ballots, and Fair Financing
Posted by: channing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shangrilalad on Jul 31, 2007 4:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter who wins the next, or the next, or the next election, nothing will change for a majority of Americans. Those who betrayed “the people” still control the political process and will never reform a system that treats them like royalty. They not only make the law, they are above the law, and that’s the way they mean to keep it.
When elections can be rigged with impunity, democracy is over.
It’s going to be interesting to see how “the land of the brave and the free” rationalize this reality.
.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Jul 31, 2007 6:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fire the elections officials.
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: ARREST the elections officials.
Posted by: channing
» RE: HANG the elections officials.
Posted by: xbj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Jul 31, 2007 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
elizabethkateswitaj.net
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Its a two party stranglehold on government.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Its a two party "may the best theift win"
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: antiapathy on Jul 31, 2007 6:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 31, 2007 6:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all know its rigged. So, what are you going to do? Keep voting and doing nothing else? Your government does not listen to you... because your government does not care. Our entire system and thus our entire nation is in the stranglehold of two parties. You can keep voting for one of them hoping that they will eventually become "progressive".. just like the conservative Christians keep voting for Republicans because they think that at some point they will get those wonderful bans on abortion and gay marriage, etc.. that they will finally get the theocracy they want, but of course, they will never get it. And you will never get truly progressive democrats, either. They will mouth the words if they have to, but thats all. Just like the Christian conservatives you will never get what you want from them because they don't see it as the will of a democratic society. They see it as leverage to get you to do vote for them... and there is no way they will ever be foolish enough to give it to you and give up that carrot. Like riding a mule... you hold a carrot out in front of him to make him go... but as soon as you give him that carrot he won't go where you want him to anymore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: schnoggi on Jul 31, 2007 8:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peacefullaim on Jul 31, 2007 8:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: channing on Jul 31, 2007 8:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Due to the current corruption in the DOJ, we cannot count on them to treat this issue Fairly, Impartially, or with Due Diligence, and for that, the DOJ itself should be held accountable.
A failure in this area of Constitutional Law will lead this nation on a path toward a New American Revolution because We are about to witness First Hand whether there is any Justice left in our Judicial Branch, woe to the US if Justice Fails Our Right To Vote!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good point"now get a lawer to listen b4 bush get his life term in office"
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 31, 2007 9:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What always maddened me the most were the exit polls (2000 & 2004). Apparently, exit polls in the past were always within a few percentage points of the actual outcome, but suddenly in 2000 and 2004, there was a HUGE percentage disparity. I didn't read this entire article and maybe that touched upon the exit polls, but that to me was such a glaring thing that I am still flabbergasted it didn't warrant a much bigger investigation (or... one at all?).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just amazing
Posted by: Trazom
» RE: Just amazing
Posted by: arclight
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 31, 2007 9:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Blackwell
Posted by: Jo1028
» RE: Blackwell
Posted by: tlv
Comments are closed-
Posted by: arclight on Jul 31, 2007 10:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose part of it was that Blackwell would have been caught if he fixed the gubernatorial vote, since he had been 30 points behind Strickland in polls on the day before the election, but what about the rest of it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They simply could not rig enough votes in 2006...
Posted by: channing
» RE: So...what happened in 2006?
Posted by: srosenfeld
» RE: So...what happened in 2006?
Posted by: tlv
» RE: So...what happened in 2006? - Military/CIA coup
Posted by: xbj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Jul 31, 2007 11:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all knew in advance that Ohio would be a swing state.
We all knew in advance that Christian/Republican operatives were motivated to make sure Republicans won everywhere in the state.
We all knew in advance that the owner of Diebold said that he would MAKE SURE that Bush was elected President.
All of this we knew in advance.
Now, we know that Rove's steamroller machine under the guise of 'voter fraud' was working overtime removing anyone from the Justice Dept. that the WH didn't like.
Now we see that a HUGE systematic effort was in place to remove evidence of wrongdoing in Ohio. This obfuscation effort was done despite federal rules in place to prevent such a task from being carried out.
It's obvious to anyone who is capable of putting 2 and 2 together that voter fraud indeed did take place in Ohio. But, it had nothing to do with Democrats. It had everything to do with Republicans and their efforts to steal the election.
The Republican party is one of failure, fraud and mythos. It is a party of authority, oligarchy and corporations. It is a party of liars, pedophiles and religious nutcases. It is a party which values Jesus and loyalty over reality and thought. The Republican party is the sole party that has shredded the Constitution and the rule of law everywhere it goes. Everywhere. There will soon not be a place in the US where the Republican machine hasn't altered our once sacred way of life.
I used to think this would end soon. But now I see it's not possible until the entire system comes to a screeching halt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Values Who?
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Voicedude on Jul 31, 2007 11:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never would have thought this would happen during this administration!
....oh!......wait a minute!.....
Yes, I did!
In fact, I set my watch to it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjm3iii on Jul 31, 2007 11:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The chairman of diabold electronic voting said on a couple occasions that he would see to it that the bush gets a second term. Bush got another term! I believe that he kept his promise!
Now Ohio claims to have lost? the election results??? Bushit!!! No paper trail? No election records??? No way to check any election results AT ALL!
Bush...your getting away with the theft of TWO presidential elections! The worst resident that never was!
The truth will come out! I just hope it's in my life time! I want to see that worthless sob thrown in jail big time!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where there's smoke there's fire!
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: makesenseofit on Jul 31, 2007 3:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And added recently is GEORGIA.
Am I pragmatic about this ? Yes, except for the rigging of elections or the connection to the president or his history of
activities and the other minions involved.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree, Makesense, but I won't VACATION in a red state.
Posted by: Ellie1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eddiecheese on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what i imagine is, the same republicans that orchestrated all these affairs (stolen elections and their cover ups) will continue with the mantra: Fuck 'Em. just like the medical community responds to the underinsured - or not insured.
ain't america grand! ain't capitalism the best!!!!!!!!
we should spread this around the WORLD!!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hirnlego on Jul 31, 2007 3:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Pelosi asks, "How do you know that?" King replies, "It's all over but the counting. And we'll take care of the counting."
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/peterking.wmv
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.html
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those who count the votes decide everything." - Joseph Stalin
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruel005 on Jul 31, 2007 4:22 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich and powerful have always dictated the rules of the game throughout history. We do have the freedom to point out the injustice and insanity of it all but, that does not change anything in anyway.
We may sincerely long for fairness, truth and justice but the dark side of our collective souls always get the upper hand. We have to "do what we have to do".
This nation was founded on lies, hypocrisy, self-righteousness and brute force.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jul 31, 2007 6:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bird-ma on Jul 31, 2007 8:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those are enough reasons to have voter-verified paper ballots, optically scanned, randomly audited! And voting integrity activists are having a very difficult time getting the message across to election officials, legislators, and the general public who are ill-informed for the most part.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 1, 2007 1:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That being said, no amount of facts matters anymore to a nation who continuously proves to the point of absurd perverse sadistic extremes that when dominated by emotional illiterates, Xtian fundamentalists and other psychotic misfits, there will be no revolution until mass amounts of U.S. people personally feel the consequential pain in a way that will make all the insane rationalizations and excuses for their own and their "leaders'" behavior seem worthless. In other words... when pigs fly and snowballs are being used in hell, then all this fact shit will matter and things will change.
We're talking 'Merkuh here, I'm not gonna hold my breath. I can absofreakinlutely guarantee that 2008 will be "won" by a Bush-lit poseur. And once again, all the fact shit won't matter... because it's "Merkuh, man, land of the butt-stoopid led by the aristocracy's finest thieves and liars.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bikey on Aug 1, 2007 1:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Interested Canadian on Aug 1, 2007 4:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Bush stole the election in 2000 and possibly again in 2004, but I haven't heard anything from Ohio's SoS or any other credible source to confirm the main point in this article. One story on Alternet isn't going to convince anyone who isn't already of the opinion that GOP stands for 'Gang of Pirates.'
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 3:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 3:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Much evidence
Posted by: Interested Canadian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 3:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great
Posted by: Interested Canadian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gerald on Aug 2, 2007 8:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A proportional representation system would change the entire complexion of the campaigning and electioneering. Here in California a proportional elected delegation might be something like 25 Democrats, 22 Republicans, 3 Libertarians and maybe an American-Nazi or two. Of course, delegates would have the right to switch their vote after two or three ballets didn't pass select a president. It such a system would be messy but look a lot more like citizen democracy, more fun too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» More Treachery
Posted by: PJAW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Darrell Kern on Aug 5, 2007 6:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blah, blah, blah- Bush, blah, blah, blah Bush.
Nothing gets done- nothing changes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: astromathman on Aug 5, 2007 3:56 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see:
Assume the chances of "accidentally" destroying the voting records is 1 in 1000. That's a WAY conservative estimate, based on how many sets of elections records have failed to be destroyed in various elections over the years.
Now assume the 56 instances were independent events. No way they could be connected, now, is there?! The probability of this happening all together would be 1 /(1000)^56 (i.e. 1000 raised to the 56th power). That's equivalent to a probability of 10^(-168), or 0.0000...001, where there are 167 zeros between the decimal and the 1.
Let's turn that around. What is the probability that someone is lying? That would be 0.9999999...999, where there are 167 9's. In more familiar percentage terms, the chances are 99.9999999....999%, with 165 9's past the decimal.
Part (b) (Homework) Repeat the calculations with the more realistic assumption that the chances of destroying the voting records accidentally is 1 in a million.
-------------------
[Answer: Probability = 10^(-336)]
--David Chandler
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mommy64 on Aug 6, 2007 1:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: National Council for Policy
Posted by: mommy64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mommy64 on Aug 6, 2007 4:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
James Carroll, correctly, identified a condition "ineffectual detachment," which exists hopelessly.
Noam Chomsky, correctly, illustrated AntiSemitism that exists among some Fundamentalists, and Solidarity members.
Chris Hedges, aside from Christopher Hitchens, appropriately illustrated root causes for anti-abortion extremism.
An extraordinarily extreme movement preIraq war included pro-war, anti-abortion forces. No other.
It isn't difficult to track powers that enforced national harassment, UNchecked globalization, and accelerating, aggressive warfare. Voter irregularity is part of the over-all picture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Libertine on Jul 30, 2007 12:43 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We need that computer voting now. Then we 'dont need no stinking records'
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Once again Albrecht is wrong and uninformed.
Posted by: Ellie1
» Why No "Surprise"? Perhaps It's the Utterly Pathetic Predictability of It All...
Posted by: grumble-bum
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hayduke1 on Jul 30, 2007 12:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the entire party should be relegated to the same dust bin as the Nazi party.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: corrupt to the core
Posted by: Spot
» RE: corrupt to the core
Posted by: rockstrigoi
» RE: corrupt to the core
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: danmonte on Jul 30, 2007 1:28 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jul 30, 2007 10:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
plur
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ohio
Posted by: reval
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nor cal surfer on Jul 30, 2007 2:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: hot karlrove on Jul 30, 2007 2:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else would you call a place where the voice of the people is supressed and elections are rigged?
What about a place where the mainstream media is a tool of the elite that own all?
Remember even Stalin's Russia had folks that would make up flyers yet that was not evidence of freedom.
What about a place where the ruling elite ignore the founding legal documents for the republic?
What about a place where your future is guaranteed to be worse if kept on the same path?
What about a place where the owning elites are activley arming via mercenaries ( Blackwater) to protect themselves form the onslaught of poor once the bubble bursts?
What about a place where any rights left are a sham and not absolute. The rights can ( and are) be taken away.
It's right here right now. 2008 will not change anything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: IP Democracy USA
Posted by: Solar Wind
» You can't run far enough to get away from their agenda.
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: socrates2 on Jul 30, 2007 2:57 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where I come from, where (and when) the will of a majority is killed/destroyed/sabotaged, that translates into treason against OUR Constitution. Pure and simple.
I am against the death penalty. So that leaves 25-to-life in prison for all convicted parties, conspirators and non-conspirators alike...
Instead, our elected officials have so little regard for our Constitutional WILL that the unholy offense of tampering with the vote becomes a simple felony or misdemeanor. That is all these white collar bureaucrats get IF AND WHEN they get prosecuted and convicted for this sacrilege against our popular will ("voice of the people, voice of god"). Recall: Most of the officials entrusted to protect the sanctity of the vote are either elected of appointed--ergo, politically well-connected...
So dollars to doughnuts the local prosecutors will tend to over-scrutinize the evidence before opting to charge these "pillars of the community." Compare them to true innocents charged with murder, rape or burglary who--before DNA evidence--were convicted on someone's flimsy "identification."
Today, with the evidence of vote-tampering "destroyed," the local DA may say, "Well, folks, I don't believe a jury of peers will vote to convict 12-0 on such flimsy evidence, so I won't file charges. End of story.
We need an authentic historical narrative that instills in the voter (citizen and juror) a true appreciation for the value and sanctity of their vote, only then can the juries appreciate the treasonous magnitude of the crime committed against the Constitution, the Republic and against the public will.
"Reader's Digest" and M.A.D.D. did it for DUI's and movies-of-the-week did it for sexual abusers, wife-beaters and other ethical lapsers. So let's educate ourselves, folks.
And let the criminals pay for treason. Treason, I say. Because when your political will and mine are relegated to the trash-heap by some corrupt official, there can be no other name for it--at least in a Constitutional democracy....
Good luck.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Treason indeed...
Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Treason indeed...
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: Treason indeed...Personally I favor fair trials - and a lot of rope
Posted by: UnEasyOne
» If you're gonna commit treason, you better own the Supreme Court. They do?
Posted by: Sojourner
» "Treason" == Bullstchit!
Posted by: BenCaxton12
» RE: Elaborate on "Constitutional Treason" if you will
Posted by: channing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayenta on Jul 30, 2007 3:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on Jul 30, 2007 3:57 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 30, 2007 6:23 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bamboozled on Jul 30, 2007 11:36 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were in charge of my county's election results, I'd personally deliver them, with as many witnesses from all major parties as possible, to a safe-deposit box.
You're telling me not only did they not protect these records, they DESTROYED THEM? That's not only criminal behavior, but TREASONOUS behavior.
Secondly, we need to have Election Day be a national paid holiday. It works in other countries, and it would completely change the country. Period.
Thirdly, we need hand-counted paper ballots. It's obvious from the hacking report that came out today, not to mention the horrific discrepancies in Ohio, WE NEED RECORDS.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: National Vote Holiday, Paper Ballots, and Fair Financing
Posted by: channing
Comments are closed-
Posted by: shangrilalad on Jul 31, 2007 4:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No matter who wins the next, or the next, or the next election, nothing will change for a majority of Americans. Those who betrayed “the people” still control the political process and will never reform a system that treats them like royalty. They not only make the law, they are above the law, and that’s the way they mean to keep it.
When elections can be rigged with impunity, democracy is over.
It’s going to be interesting to see how “the land of the brave and the free” rationalize this reality.
.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Jul 31, 2007 6:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fire the elections officials.
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: ARREST the elections officials.
Posted by: channing
» RE: HANG the elections officials.
Posted by: xbj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Jul 31, 2007 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
elizabethkateswitaj.net
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Its a two party stranglehold on government.
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Its a two party "may the best theift win"
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: antiapathy on Jul 31, 2007 6:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 31, 2007 6:58 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all know its rigged. So, what are you going to do? Keep voting and doing nothing else? Your government does not listen to you... because your government does not care. Our entire system and thus our entire nation is in the stranglehold of two parties. You can keep voting for one of them hoping that they will eventually become "progressive".. just like the conservative Christians keep voting for Republicans because they think that at some point they will get those wonderful bans on abortion and gay marriage, etc.. that they will finally get the theocracy they want, but of course, they will never get it. And you will never get truly progressive democrats, either. They will mouth the words if they have to, but thats all. Just like the Christian conservatives you will never get what you want from them because they don't see it as the will of a democratic society. They see it as leverage to get you to do vote for them... and there is no way they will ever be foolish enough to give it to you and give up that carrot. Like riding a mule... you hold a carrot out in front of him to make him go... but as soon as you give him that carrot he won't go where you want him to anymore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: schnoggi on Jul 31, 2007 8:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: peacefullaim on Jul 31, 2007 8:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: channing on Jul 31, 2007 8:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Due to the current corruption in the DOJ, we cannot count on them to treat this issue Fairly, Impartially, or with Due Diligence, and for that, the DOJ itself should be held accountable.
A failure in this area of Constitutional Law will lead this nation on a path toward a New American Revolution because We are about to witness First Hand whether there is any Justice left in our Judicial Branch, woe to the US if Justice Fails Our Right To Vote!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good point"now get a lawer to listen b4 bush get his life term in office"
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 31, 2007 9:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What always maddened me the most were the exit polls (2000 & 2004). Apparently, exit polls in the past were always within a few percentage points of the actual outcome, but suddenly in 2000 and 2004, there was a HUGE percentage disparity. I didn't read this entire article and maybe that touched upon the exit polls, but that to me was such a glaring thing that I am still flabbergasted it didn't warrant a much bigger investigation (or... one at all?).
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Just amazing
Posted by: Trazom
» RE: Just amazing
Posted by: arclight
Comments are closed-
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 31, 2007 9:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Blackwell
Posted by: Jo1028
» RE: Blackwell
Posted by: tlv
Comments are closed-
Posted by: arclight on Jul 31, 2007 10:01 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose part of it was that Blackwell would have been caught if he fixed the gubernatorial vote, since he had been 30 points behind Strickland in polls on the day before the election, but what about the rest of it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: They simply could not rig enough votes in 2006...
Posted by: channing
» RE: So...what happened in 2006?
Posted by: srosenfeld
» RE: So...what happened in 2006?
Posted by: tlv
» RE: So...what happened in 2006? - Military/CIA coup
Posted by: xbj
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Jul 31, 2007 11:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all knew in advance that Ohio would be a swing state.
We all knew in advance that Christian/Republican operatives were motivated to make sure Republicans won everywhere in the state.
We all knew in advance that the owner of Diebold said that he would MAKE SURE that Bush was elected President.
All of this we knew in advance.
Now, we know that Rove's steamroller machine under the guise of 'voter fraud' was working overtime removing anyone from the Justice Dept. that the WH didn't like.
Now we see that a HUGE systematic effort was in place to remove evidence of wrongdoing in Ohio. This obfuscation effort was done despite federal rules in place to prevent such a task from being carried out.
It's obvious to anyone who is capable of putting 2 and 2 together that voter fraud indeed did take place in Ohio. But, it had nothing to do with Democrats. It had everything to do with Republicans and their efforts to steal the election.
The Republican party is one of failure, fraud and mythos. It is a party of authority, oligarchy and corporations. It is a party of liars, pedophiles and religious nutcases. It is a party which values Jesus and loyalty over reality and thought. The Republican party is the sole party that has shredded the Constitution and the rule of law everywhere it goes. Everywhere. There will soon not be a place in the US where the Republican machine hasn't altered our once sacred way of life.
I used to think this would end soon. But now I see it's not possible until the entire system comes to a screeching halt.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Values Who?
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Voicedude on Jul 31, 2007 11:47 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never would have thought this would happen during this administration!
....oh!......wait a minute!.....
Yes, I did!
In fact, I set my watch to it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mjm3iii on Jul 31, 2007 11:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The chairman of diabold electronic voting said on a couple occasions that he would see to it that the bush gets a second term. Bush got another term! I believe that he kept his promise!
Now Ohio claims to have lost? the election results??? Bushit!!! No paper trail? No election records??? No way to check any election results AT ALL!
Bush...your getting away with the theft of TWO presidential elections! The worst resident that never was!
The truth will come out! I just hope it's in my life time! I want to see that worthless sob thrown in jail big time!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where there's smoke there's fire!
Posted by: Krain61
Comments are closed-
Posted by: makesenseofit on Jul 31, 2007 3:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And added recently is GEORGIA.
Am I pragmatic about this ? Yes, except for the rigging of elections or the connection to the president or his history of
activities and the other minions involved.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree, Makesense, but I won't VACATION in a red state.
Posted by: Ellie1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: eddiecheese on Jul 31, 2007 3:04 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what i imagine is, the same republicans that orchestrated all these affairs (stolen elections and their cover ups) will continue with the mantra: Fuck 'Em. just like the medical community responds to the underinsured - or not insured.
ain't america grand! ain't capitalism the best!!!!!!!!
we should spread this around the WORLD!!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hirnlego on Jul 31, 2007 3:17 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Pelosi asks, "How do you know that?" King replies, "It's all over but the counting. And we'll take care of the counting."
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/peterking.wmv
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/2004votefraud.html
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those who count the votes decide everything." - Joseph Stalin
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ruel005 on Jul 31, 2007 4:22 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich and powerful have always dictated the rules of the game throughout history. We do have the freedom to point out the injustice and insanity of it all but, that does not change anything in anyway.
We may sincerely long for fairness, truth and justice but the dark side of our collective souls always get the upper hand. We have to "do what we have to do".
This nation was founded on lies, hypocrisy, self-righteousness and brute force.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Jul 31, 2007 6:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bird-ma on Jul 31, 2007 8:03 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those are enough reasons to have voter-verified paper ballots, optically scanned, randomly audited! And voting integrity activists are having a very difficult time getting the message across to election officials, legislators, and the general public who are ill-informed for the most part.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 1, 2007 1:02 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That being said, no amount of facts matters anymore to a nation who continuously proves to the point of absurd perverse sadistic extremes that when dominated by emotional illiterates, Xtian fundamentalists and other psychotic misfits, there will be no revolution until mass amounts of U.S. people personally feel the consequential pain in a way that will make all the insane rationalizations and excuses for their own and their "leaders'" behavior seem worthless. In other words... when pigs fly and snowballs are being used in hell, then all this fact shit will matter and things will change.
We're talking 'Merkuh here, I'm not gonna hold my breath. I can absofreakinlutely guarantee that 2008 will be "won" by a Bush-lit poseur. And once again, all the fact shit won't matter... because it's "Merkuh, man, land of the butt-stoopid led by the aristocracy's finest thieves and liars.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bikey on Aug 1, 2007 1:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Interested Canadian on Aug 1, 2007 4:22 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Bush stole the election in 2000 and possibly again in 2004, but I haven't heard anything from Ohio's SoS or any other credible source to confirm the main point in this article. One story on Alternet isn't going to convince anyone who isn't already of the opinion that GOP stands for 'Gang of Pirates.'
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 3:54 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 3:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Much evidence
Posted by: Interested Canadian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 3:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Great
Posted by: Interested Canadian
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gerald on Aug 2, 2007 8:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A proportional representation system would change the entire complexion of the campaigning and electioneering. Here in California a proportional elected delegation might be something like 25 Democrats, 22 Republicans, 3 Libertarians and maybe an American-Nazi or two. Of course, delegates would have the right to switch their vote after two or three ballets didn't pass select a president. It such a system would be messy but look a lot more like citizen democracy, more fun too.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» More Treachery
Posted by: PJAW
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Darrell Kern on Aug 5, 2007 6:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blah, blah, blah- Bush, blah, blah, blah Bush.
Nothing gets done- nothing changes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: astromathman on Aug 5, 2007 3:56 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see:
Assume the chances of "accidentally" destroying the voting records is 1 in 1000. That's a WAY conservative estimate, based on how many sets of elections records have failed to be destroyed in various elections over the years.
Now assume the 56 instances were independent events. No way they could be connected, now, is there?! The probability of this happening all together would be 1 /(1000)^56 (i.e. 1000 raised to the 56th power). That's equivalent to a probability of 10^(-168), or 0.0000...001, where there are 167 zeros between the decimal and the 1.
Let's turn that around. What is the probability that someone is lying? That would be 0.9999999...999, where there are 167 9's. In more familiar percentage terms, the chances are 99.9999999....999%, with 165 9's past the decimal.
Part (b) (Homework) Repeat the calculations with the more realistic assumption that the chances of destroying the voting records accidentally is 1 in a million.
-------------------
[Answer: Probability = 10^(-336)]
--David Chandler
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mommy64 on Aug 6, 2007 1:14 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: National Council for Policy
Posted by: mommy64
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mommy64 on Aug 6, 2007 4:53 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
James Carroll, correctly, identified a condition "ineffectual detachment," which exists hopelessly.
Noam Chomsky, correctly, illustrated AntiSemitism that exists among some Fundamentalists, and Solidarity members.
Chris Hedges, aside from Christopher Hitchens, appropriately illustrated root causes for anti-abortion extremism.
An extraordinarily extreme movement preIraq war included pro-war, anti-abortion forces. No other.
It isn't difficult to track powers that enforced national harassment, UNchecked globalization, and accelerating, aggressive warfare. Voter irregularity is part of the over-all picture.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




