Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Pleas on Larry King for Lohan, But What About Other Drug Offenders?

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted July 26, 2007.


There are no qualms about locking up the thousands of poor and unknown.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Within hours after ill-fated model-actress Lindsay Lohan was busted on suspicion of drunk driving and drug possession in Santa Monica her teary eye father, and a parade of Hollywood celebrities, and some of Lohan's friends and associates, made sobbing, heart wrenching pleas on the Larry King show for public understanding of Lohan's ordeal. Lohan's attorney made his pitch for public understanding, calling addiction a terrible and vicious disease.

The kid glove protective attitude of many in the entertainment industry toward Lohan is hardly surprising. She has been released each time within hours on low bond, wears a SCRAM monitoring bracelet, and alcohol monitor on her ankle, gets tested regularly, and got top notch treatment at a posh Malibu, California rehab center. Her film," I Know Who Killed Me," which is scheduled for release almost certainly will pack audiences in, if for no other reason out of curiosity and her rogue name.

There's nothing wrong with Lohan's entertainment industry friends, and a star-struck public, pleading for empathy for her and urging the courts to spare her a jail sentence, and to give her the help that she obviously needs. But there are thousands of drug offenders that need the same compassion and help as Lohan. The big difference is that these drug abusers aren't high-profile, bankable screen commodities. They are mostly poor blacks and Latinos. The estimate is that nearly one-fourth of the more than one million blacks that pack America's prisons are there for non-violent, drug-related crimes. It costs billions to keep them there.

Putting them behind bars has had staggering consequences. It has torn apart families and communities. It has been the single biggest reason for the bloat in federal and state spending on prison construction, maintenance, and the escalation in the number of prosecutors needed to handle the flood of drug cases. Also, few poor, black and Latino drug offenders will be immediately released by police, as Lohan continues to be, and then be allowed to luxuriate in a posh drug treatment center.

The pampered treatment of celebrities such as Lohan carries another public pitfall. It could fuel a backlash to the mounting efforts by many drug reform advocates and public officials to push Congress to eliminate the gaping racially-warped disparity in the drug sentencing laws. These laws mandate minimum sentences for petty drug offenses for those tried in federal court. Far more black and Latino drug offenders, than whites, are tried there. Former President Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno twice gave half-hearted approval to the U.S. Sentencing Commission's recommendation that the drug sentencing laws be softened. Twice Congress has refused to act.

Lohan's repeated busts could also cripple efforts by drug reform advocates to win wider public support for state-wide initiatives such as Proposition 36 passed overwhelmingly by California voters a few years ago. The law mandates treatment, not jail for non-violent, first time drug offenders. Since then, other states have either passed or proposed similar laws that proscribe drug rehab rather than tossing the key on drug offenders. It's part a cost cutting measure, and part recognition that jails have been a grossly ineffective way to fight illicit drug abuse.

Drug warriors loath these initiatives. They claim that treatment, rather than severe jail sentences, encourages drug abusers to laugh at the courts and the law and puts the public at greater peril.

The notion that celebrities such as Lohan thumb their noses at the law has also stoked public anger over the celebrity double standard. That was glaringly evident in the recent tragicomic drama involving Lohan's other bad girl celebrity counterpart, Paris Hilton. Hilton's early release by L.A. County Sheriff Lee Baca brought the wrath of an angry public down on his head. The early release and her later puff ball treatment in jail was a blatant play of the celebrity double standard card. But it did at least momentarily open a small window of opportunity for prison reformers to use the Hilton case to demand the same medical treatment Hilton got for other female inmates.

That window slammed shut fast. L.A county officials haven't uttered a peep since the Hilton episode about spending more on treatment and rehab programs for drug abusers. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's department also has been mute on whether other inmates will get some facsimile of the medical treatment Hilton got.

A few years back a spokes person for the California Department of Corrections publicly declared that they would consider placing repeated celebrity drug abuser Robert Downey, Jr. in a residential treatment facility rather than the county jail. The spokesperson said without a hint that he recognized the celebrity double-standard, "We don't want to just lock them up." He meant the well-to-do and famous, such as Downey and now Lohan, not the thousands of poor and unknown. There are no such qualms about locking them up.

And we darn well know, there's won't be any teary-eyed pleas for understanding for them on the Larry King show.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drugs, incarceration, lohan, treatment

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His new book The Latino Challenge to Black America: Towards a Conversation between African-Americans and Hispanics (Middle Passage Press and Hispanic Economics New York) in English and Spanish will be out in October.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
if she had been in Russia....
Posted by: eosrk on Jul 26, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...she be doing very hard tiime. If Putin slammed an multi-billionaire in prison, what is she to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best of Friends
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 26, 2007 12:05 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe Lohan and Gore can be cell mates!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Best of Friends Posted by: PirateJesus
No easy answer to addiction
Posted by: jmooney on Jul 26, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know a little about addiction. I know some folks found a way to get and stay sober as a result of being sent to prison. I know some people who spend years in prison and get out and go right back onto their drug(s) of choice. I know some people who get deferred to treatment by the courts and use that as a way to change their lives; I know some who do that and as soon as the pressure is off they go back on the addiction trail. I know people who have been in and out of 12-step fellowships for years and years and years and NEVER totally stop using. I know some that walk in the first day and never use again. I know some who take years and years and years in 12 step groups and FINALLY find a way to stay clean/sober.

The prisons are undoubtedly filled with addicted people. They do criminal things to get their drugs and those crimes need to be punished, I guess. Some folks are jailed just because they bought their illegal stuff. I'm not so sure people who posess amounts that are clearly for personal use should be sent to jail absent another crime (stealing, wreckless endangerement in a vehicle, etc.). But I don't know that sending them to treatment generally makes a difference.

I think we gotta keep trying with addicts. More research and development on medications that will keep them off their "bad" medications. I don't think 12 steps works for all that many. It works for some, and it is good to have support, but to divert folks into programs that are basically religious in nature doesn't strike me as having been all that effective and further erodes the separation of church and state.

Lohan is a sad case regardless of whether or not she is rich, attractive, artistically talented, etc. To see her washed out countenance on that mug shot is to see someone who is just lost, missing in America. And there are many such people in the land, some ostensibly free out using their stuff, some clearly unfree in prisons. We don't see their faces on mug shots so we don't know so much about them, but they are tragic, just as she is tragic. There is something about humans in our society that lends itself toward addiction.

I recently re-read a book called "Heart of Addiction" by Lance Dodes, which says that the common element in addiction is that the addicted person early in life found him or herself powerless in their environment and found addictive ways (drugs, sex, gambling, etc.) to re-assert their power. You know, if I am powerless here, at least I can do something to change the way I feel. And that becomes imbedded and takes a life of its own. I don't think addiction is a real disease like cancer (one can't find the remnants of addiction in a dead person like you can for other legitimate diseases), but addiction is a psychological disorder. It is more like a syndrome where we are seeing symptons of something deeper.

I guess I remember that tale of the girl throwing back star fish into the water and telling a pessimistic that while she can't save them all, the star fish she just through back was saved, and she made a difference there. We gotta keep trying to save addicts, one at a time, I guess. Keep searching for new techniques, not letting ourselves get stuck in 1930-era treatment regimes (AA/NA) that don't work for many.

We can all joke and yuck it up about Lindsey and Al III. I get it. But addiction really and truly isn't a joke. Those who struggle with it sometimes make light of it; sort of gallows humor. But it is a lethal problem that is sucking so much productivity out of our nation. It is sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Damn fine post. Posted by: ekipnrut
» RE: Damn fine post. Posted by: jmooney
Legalize!
Posted by: The Populist on Jul 26, 2007 1:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Legalize, tax, employee farmers, greener textiles, renewable energy, Legalize!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She should go to jail from DRIVING. Other than that she did nothing
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jul 26, 2007 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wrong, in the moral sense. The laws are ridiculous. People should be able to party however this wish, as long as they don't drive under the influence, commit other crimes, etc. If she is rich enough to pay for her drugs and drink and doesn't drive or commit crimes I see no problem with her behaviour. People should only go to prison if they hurt other people or potentially hurt others (drive a car, fly a plane, drive a boat, etc) (and I'm not talking about her 'fans'.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Jul 26, 2007 8:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an ex addict and can tell you that you can free yourself, all by yourself, but you have to take the decision, I didnt even need any therapy, although my addiction was quite severe and lasted for seven long years, yes I felt sick, almost went mad and life seemed empty for long long weeks but I won in the end.

That was years ago, never approached drugs again but if others want to lose their time, money and sanity its okay with me, to each his life and the decisions that determine it.

To each his fight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: .To hell with addicts. Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: .To hell with addicts. Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: .To hell with addicts. Posted by: Doubtom
Well...
Posted by: talkville on Jul 28, 2007 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We get the society, much as the government, that we deserve. For the rich, pre-text; for the rest, text. Lohan is the symbol; those many who are imprisoned the symbolized. Sentiment is engaged for Lohan; laws are invoked for the rest. Lohan's troubles are representative; for the rest troubles are actual, concrete and disastrous. For Lohan it's a PR problem; for the rest it's an entire life-time. I once saw a show entitled "American Justice", as if the adjective was more valuable than the noun. A little sniff and "bump in the road" for Ms Lohan; a deleted potential for thousands. And the liquidity in the markets is more than one might think. It's only vanity which Ms Lohan, Ms Hilton, Ms Spears must contend with. What must the thousands in prison for similar actions contend with? Ah, law and order so grand!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What happens...
Posted by: Gisele on Jul 30, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when the pampered Ms. Lohan kills someone because the poor little thing couldn't control her booze and drugs? Not much.

Wouldn't it be better to have her REAL friends kick her in the ass, and a family that truly gives a damn tell her to grow up? That this ain't a dress rehearsal?!

I bet she'd rather hear those words from friends and family, than hear her own voice saying ... "I had it all, but...." It's time for reality to hit her in the head before her steering wheel does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is this important?
Posted by: Ellie1 on Jul 30, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is Alternet and most media outlets devoting space and time to this? WHO CARES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why is this important? Posted by: zyxwvut
Don't think about entering Canada if you have even the pettiest offence on record.
Posted by: Don on Jul 30, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if you have the most trivial offence on your record, you may be denied entry to Canada at the border. It appears that every arrest or conviction on your record for your entire life is now on a computer list accessible to Immigration.

My daughter and her boyfriend, who live near Nashville, TN had planned to drive up to Thunder Bay, ON for a brief vacation.

They drove hundreds of miles north all the way to the border, and when they attempted to cross, were detained at the checkpoint.

After waiting for about 30 minutes, they were informed that they had been denied entry to Canada because my daughter's boyfriend had been arrested 5 years earlier for underage drinking when he was 19. Now how could being caught drinking underage 5 years ago have anything to do with being a threat to the country to-day, as an adult. Even more ridiculous, he would have been of legal drinking age in Canada at the time.

When they turned around, they had to go through the US checkpoint before re-entering the USA. US customs knew they had been denied entry, and could not possibly be smuggling anything from Canada, but they took advantage of an opportunity that normally they would not have legally had on the streets in the USA, and did a complete search of the car, tearing through every inch of their stuff. My daughter was very upset when they took her personal diary and the customs agent spent about 20 minutes reading through it page-by-page. She had a couple of references to drug use written on some of the pages, so I am sure the customs agent fount this of interest. I am wondering if he scanned this and put it in the data base.

This incident points to one of the reasons for petty drug prohibition laws: it gives the government an extra layer of control over the population.

Welcome to the North American Police State.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Earnest Plea for Lindsay Lohan: Send Her to Jail To Learn Consequences of Behavior
Posted by: freethink7 on Jul 30, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sick of these pampered celebrities and pop culture icons asking for special dispensation for their drug/alcohol crimes. As Earl Ofari Hutchinson pointed out, there are no family members/friends of minorities and/or the poor allowed on talk shows like Larry King where their case can be discussed to make public appeals for amnesty/leniency.

Driving under the influence is extremely dangerous. If she wants to stay at home, drink, do drugs, party it down - that’s one thing. But going out and driving a car having the potential to kill innocent victims is a serious crime.

Mr. Hutchinson is correct: Our prison system of full of drug offenders who do not have access to resources or celebrity status for acquittal and out of the joint (as is case with Paris Hilton and Lohan). Let’s level the playing field for all these coddled and otherwise indulged celebs: Break the law: go to jail, and you don’t automatically receive a get out of jail card and instant exoneration for your over-glorified celebrity status.

No more leniencies for pampered-overindulged-coddled celebrities. Let Lindsay do jail time and then go to drug/alcohol treatment afterwards. She may emerge a person with better character and standards after doing a stint in the joint and learning consequences of behavior. Maybe her time in drug/alcohol rehab will be more meaningful and long lasting after some jail time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why hasn't rehab worked?
Posted by: deby on Jul 30, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Addictions expert Dr. Marc F. Kern says the disease model is killing people, because it is stopping many people from getting the alcohol and drug help they need, that would really work for them. He says the disease model of addiction embraced by most of the medical community scares people, and ignores effective alternatives.

According to the recent National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (reported by ABC News 07/3/2007), 30.3 percent of the U.S. population engages in problem drinking, but only 24 percent of those suffering from alcohol dependency seek help, and only 7 percent seek treatment for alcohol abuse.

"We have a time warp in the practice of addiction medicine in this county," Dr. Kern says. "Would you put your life in the hands of someone who only has a 15% success rate?" (The AA retention rate is 5%, according to Alcoholics Anonymous World Services' own statistics).

He adds, "The root of why people aren't getting help is the shame, blame, intensity and religious overtones of the standard treatment, and physicians 'diseasing' the problem."

Continued in article: Beverly Hills Addictions Expert Addresses Question: 'Why Hasn't Alcohol Rehab Worked for Lindsay Lohan and 93% of Problem Drinkers in U.S.?'

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2007/7/prweb542606.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm sure
Posted by: willymack on Jul 30, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is something you already know: Money talks. You KNOW what walks. The paint job on the person with the moola means not a thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think
Posted by: gurly on Jul 31, 2007 10:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that imprisoning people for possession of drugs is costing the country millions that need not be happening. If a person wants to engage in drugs, it should be a personal choice not a public charade. The drug courts are set up to get government grant money, for court house officials to enjoy. However, those attending drug court are usually the people without much money. People with money usually get suspended sentences after they rat what they know. If a person commits a crime while under the influence of drugs, that is a different story--such as robbery or assault and battery. There are too many people in prison for possessing drugs - and who is Lindsay Lohan- she is nobody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement