Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Outsourcing Intelligence: How Bush Gets His National Intelligence from Private Companies

By R.J. Hillhouse, The Nation. Posted July 31, 2007.


Private corporations are now a major staple of national intelligence and are heavily involved in producing the most important and most sensitive national security document -- the President's Daily Brief.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by R.J. Hillhouse

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The unprecedented involvement of private corporations in the Iraq War has been well documented. Private soldiers working for Blackwater USA, Triple Canopy and others provide security services against military-level threats, and they regularly engage in combat.

But what is not generally known is that the secret side of the Iraq War and the larger "war on terror" is also conducted by private corporations, fielding private spies. The reach of these corporations has extended into the Oval Office. Corporations are heavily involved in creating the analytical products that underlie the nation's most important and most sensitive national security document, the President's Daily Brief (PDB).

Over the past six years, a quiet revolution has occurred in the intelligence community toward wide-scale outsourcing to corporations and away from the long-established practice of keeping operations in US government hands, with only select outsourcing of certain jobs to independently contracted experts. Key functions of intelligence agencies are now run by private corporations. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) revealed in May that 70 percent of the intelligence budget goes to contractors.

For all practical purposes, effective control of the NSA is with private corporations, which run its support and management functions. As the Washington Post's Walter Pincus reported last year, more than 70 percent of the staff of the Pentagon's newest intelligence unit, CIFA (Counterintelligence Field Activity), is made up of corporate contractors.

Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) lawyers revealed at a conference in May that contractors make up 51 percent of the staff in DIA offices. At the CIA, the situation is similar. Between 50 and 60 percent of the workforce of the CIA's most important directorate, the National Clandestine Service (NCS), responsible for the gathering of human intelligence, is composed of employees of for-profit corporations.

Employees of private corporations -- "green badgers," in CIA parlance -- provide sensitive services ranging from covert CIA operations in Iraq to recruiting and running spies. They also gather human intelligence on behalf of the CIA and analyze it, creating intelligence products used by the intelligence community and also shared with other branches of government.

Corporate intelligence professionals from companies such as Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Booz Allen Hamilton, SAIC and others are thoroughly integrated into analytical divisions throughout the intelligence community, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It is the ODNI that produces the final document of the President's Daily Brief.

The President's Daily Brief is an aggregate of the most critical analyses from the sixteen agencies that make up the intelligence community. Staff at the ODNI sift through reports to complete the PDB, which is presented to the President every day as the US government's most accurate and most current assessment of priority national security issues. It was the PDB that warned on August 6, 2001, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, cia, national intelligence, contractors

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fascism has arrived.
Posted by: justaguy on Jul 31, 2007 12:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stunning report. Absolutely mind boggling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the Republicans like to privatize: it's good for the elite.
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 31, 2007 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any government function that can be privatized can (a) become a new source of profit at the expense of the efficiency of the function, such as the Social Security program, and (b) its internal processes be made opaque and thus not subject to oversight, like covert operations. It is a lie that private industry, which supposedly responds to market forces, is more efficient than government. Industry takes a profit, and that makes it less efficient.

Imagine how much less would be paid in insurance premiums if the federal government sold all types of insurance to all types of people according to the same actuarial tables that private insurers use, but only had to collect enough in premiums to cover the cost of the benefits paid and the cost of paying them - no expense of advertising or in paying out profits like with private companies.

Thus, the insurance industry should be nationalized. That would help America. Instead, we get intelligence privatized. That helps corporate America.

Imagine if America had a pharmaceutical research and development unit that rivaled NASA, and that all of the drugs generated in all of its labs could be sold to the world at cost. What if we had publicly developed and thus owned a third of the AIDS drugs? How easy would it be to just stamp them out for a few cents a pill and get them to everybody who needs them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» NASA IS Almost Private !! Posted by: gellero
Really frightening stuff
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 31, 2007 2:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Private companies benefit significantly from war. It would be irresponsible of them towards their own shareholders not to offer intelligence information that leads to war. Meanwhile we eat what the corporates give us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The title says it all.
Posted by: talkville on Jul 31, 2007 3:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IF, and this is a highly questionable proposition, our government stands in for the "public weal", and it must purchase its "intelligence" from private parties, what then does this say about our government and, by extension, each and every one of us? What Bush II seems to be really saying is that he and the entire institutions of our government and all the civil servants in it are just too dumb to manage. A privatized State is an owned society. It's an affront to the people to be considered too dumb to manage their own affairs. The costs lay upon us, the benefits accumulate to them. Corporatism is fascism - transforming what is public into what is private. The Emperor, with a closet full of suits or dresses, or with no clothes at all is too disturbingly close to attaining a quite private project of his own. It's time for all of us to gather our OWN intelligence to counter the Clever and Wily ones amongst us -- in-source them, or send them packing! Bush II has constantly mis-under-estimated the intelligence of society. Mercenary spies are in principle un-trustworthy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Time for a new paradigm Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Time for a new paradigm Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: The title says it all. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Come, behold the skink Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Come, behold the skink Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The title says it all. Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: The title says it all. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The title says it all. Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The title says it all. Posted by: talkville
Surprize ! -- Surprize !! Should we expect George to change his stripes....
Posted by: wmGreybeard on Jul 31, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has privatized everything else. Why not the PDB?? They will tell him what he wants to hear. And besides, even GWB does not have enough incompetent cronies, willing to work for government pay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A bought and paid for America
Posted by: ray burchard on Jul 31, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Through campaign financing, The worlds largest corporate military complex America, customarily uses the theater of conflict to display and demonstrate its fear mongering wares.

War for profit, suprise, suprise. America's new moto "We have implements of distruction, will travel" or "Silence, a place to hide one's ignorance and ineptitude" and "No man stands before profit"

Aren't we all just proud of our profit oreintated, bought and paid political leadership, I know I'm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't bother me with facts that I don't like. I won't believe them.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Jul 31, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just another example of a situation that's too terrible to be believed. Over the next decades there will be countless books and articles showing how we've been misled into wars and how the CEO's of private intelligence companies have become billionaires selling information that benefitted them. And nobody will believe it. Yes, they will know the facts but deep down they won't believe them.

For at least 50 years there have been tons of ink and paper dedicated to the proposition that both parties are bribed with campaign contributions and that our legislators are bought by corporate lobbies. Almost everybody knows the facts but few actually believe them. Who wants to face the terrifying fact that he is ruled by legal constructs that have no reality other than legal papers and no purpose other than to turn a profit? Not many that's for sure. Surely not the 48% of our citizens who actually vote in an election between two parties who operate against the interests of the voters.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cassandra chimes in Posted by: LMNOP
RON PAUL PROMISES NEVER TO POLITICALIZE INTELLIGENCE...
Posted by: poppop_schell on Jul 31, 2007 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he gets but use it to best dend the USA against REAL terrorism. He was NOT fooled in 2003 by the intelligence leading up to the Bush War. He voted against the war and has never voted for any funding of the war. He KNOWS that Iraq has caused greater terrorist danger to America and will bring our troops home and redeploy them in small tactical units to really go after the terrorists where they live. He is a noninterventionist: a true peace candidate.

ronpaul2008.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scary Stuff
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Jul 31, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read recently that the last Canadian Census was conducted using hardware and software support from Lockheed Martin.

In today's highly networked operating environments, it wouldn't surprise me to find out that Lockheed Martin has direct access to the actual records, for 'support' purposes.

Under the USA Patriot Act, those records could be demanded by Homeland Security. Then the very personal data of Canadian citizens is in the hands of Gonzo the criminal attorney, or Skeletor (Chertoff) over at the Dept of Homeland Security. Can anyone say Maher Arar?

Scaaaaaarrrry!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The treasonous intelligence web of PNAC neocons: PART 1.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 31, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2002, the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq (CLI) set up offices on Capitol Hill under the direction of its president, Randy Scheunemann, who previously worked in DOD Secretary Rumsfeld's office as a consultant on Iraq policy.

Chairman of the CLI was Bruce P. Jackson, a former vice president of Lockheed Martin, who chaired the GOP’s platform subcommittee for National Security and Foreign Policy when Bush ran for president in 2000.

Also in 2002, Pentagon consultant Tom Donnelly replaced Jackson at Lockheed Martin.

Not coincidentally, all four men -- Scheunemann, Rumsfeld, Jackson and Donnelly -- are former members of the rightwing extremist organization, Project for A New American Century (PNAC), which advocated the overthrow of Saddam Hussein well before George W. took office. Also not coincidentally, Dub-ya is connected to PNAC through his brother, Jebb, an orginal founder.

This is just one strand of a huge intelligence web spun by treasonous PNAC neocons. Stay tuned for more revelations.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet and editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intelligent Intelligence
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jul 31, 2007 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I generally do not have a problem with outsourcing - military has been doing it since prior to WW2 in support of China etc.. but in a war we are in I oppose non military units in military operations and widescal outsourcing of Intel for this reason..

""Concerned members of the intelligence community have told me that if a corporation wanted to insert items favorable to itself or its clients into the PDB to influence the US national security agenda, at this time it would be virtually undetectable. These companies have analysts and often intelligence collectors spread throughout the system and have the access to introduce intelligence into the system.""

The problem is that the high pay offered by corporations far outweighs what the gov't can supply.. specialized talent is not always found inhouse.

While it is ok to use talent from outside concerns, it has to be in areas that cannot be supplied by inhouse talent. The fact that special interest intel can be introduced into breifings (if true) is very disturbing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Cheney Doctrine in full bloom Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Intelligent Intelligence Posted by: Lincoln fan
Revolving Door Factory: Booz Allen Hamilton
Posted by: eddie torres on Jul 31, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wall Street Journal writer Bernard Wysocki did a March 30 piece titled "Is US Government Outsourcing Its Brain?" that looks at Mitre Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton and their influence on national security. In particular, the article points out how so many former US government employees and Pentagon officers are working for Booz Allen that they hold regular classes on 'How To Spot A General' and 'So, Now You're A Civilian'.

Past employees include Admiral Michael McConnell (NSA head) and James Woolsey (CIA head).

Above all, Booz Allen Hamilton was a key driver behind Admiral John Poindexter's Total Information Awareness (TIA) program, which morphed into the Terrorism Information Awareness Program (TIAP). Although defunded by Congress in 2003, there is evidence that many components of the program continue in other guises. Where the data mining of TIAP ends, does the data mining of Alberto Gonzales' "other terrorist surveillance programs" begin?

Only Colonel Turd Blossom knows for sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Privatizing Intel...
Posted by: jimmyaj on Jul 31, 2007 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, what was it that they used to say, "The customer is always right"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heroes or whores?
Posted by: veive on Jul 31, 2007 3:51 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What choices are made when patriotism conflicts with profit margin? How can patriotism possibly win out when private companies sole raison d'etre is the next quarterly report's bottom line? Some things ought not be privatized and the defense of one's country is among those things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"INTELLIGENCE" THAT IS ALREADY PRE-DETERMINED
Posted by: sofla100 on Jul 31, 2007 6:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides taking care of pals and big donors, the privatization of intelligence ensures that "the answers given," will always be consistent with what is expected and desired in the first place. Case in point, the run-up to the Iraq war. Bush II is quoted numerous times even before 911 about how he wanted Saddam "gone" and after 911 made it a centerpiece of administration policy to go after Saddam. Even though Saddam was never linked to 911, WMD's, etc. From the get-go, it was Bush, along with Rumsfeld, who therefore determined what the "intelligence was going to say," even before it had been collected, let alone analyzed. Now, by using private contractors, Bush can be assured "the right answers" will always be forthcoming into the future. The next big test of this will be with Iran. Once again the White House will be quoting "various intelligence officials and undisclosable sources," and they will be telling us about Iran's nuclear weapons development and about her support for Al Queda. Never mind that these "intelligence officials," are the privatized contractors cherry picked for the job, and with all the "intelligence" already pre-determined.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since Bush made an connetion between al-Qadia and Iraq.....
Posted by: eosrk on Jul 31, 2007 9:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then why is the Gerbel not making an connection between an 20-plus billion arms sales to Saudi Arabia and.........an unstable government, which at any time can be overthrown.

Like he was able to make an connection between Hurricanes, Gulf of Mexico, and a city that sits over 20 feet BELOW FUCKIN' SEA LEVEL!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Saudi Arms Deals...
Posted by: gellero on Aug 1, 2007 8:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We should be happy to recoup some of our petrodollars. Let them fight for themselves for a change.
There are plenty of suppliers who would fill the void if we didn't.....don't delude yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

INNUENDO
Posted by: gellero on Aug 1, 2007 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author only mentions a few publicly held corporations like Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon, et all. Perhaps there's a very valid reason for this....namely, that they have resources and advanced technology the government does not own or have access to.
Is the author saying we should not use these resources? What would be the concequences of that?
It seems from the posts here that most readers have the impression there are secret cadres of Ratheon & Lockheed-Martin 007's wreaking havoc on an unsuspecting world.
Is there evidence of that??
The House Intellegence Committee is run by the Democrats now.....they don't seem to have a problem with this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]