Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

U.S. Abandons Iraqi Translators to Their Fates While Diminutive Denmark Rescues Its Own

By Maura Stephens, AlterNet. Posted July 27, 2007.


A followup to the harrowing tale of "Andy," the local interpreter who is fighting for his life after serving the U.S. military in Iraq.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Maura Stephens

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I recently wrote about the dire situation of "Andy," an Iraqi interpreter who has worked for the U.S. military for nearly four years, and his young wife and their two babies. As a result of his work with the U.S. Army, their home was bombed, Andy's father and brother were murdered and their own lives were threatened. Since last April they have been caught in a seemingly endless tangle of U.S. State Department red tape.

When the story was published on July 10, they had been approved for a visa to the United States and were waiting to fly the following Saturday from Basra, Iraq, to Amman, Jordan, where they would be processed at the U.S. Embassy before going on to start a new life in the United States. After a heartbreaking farewell to their families, the couple and their 2-year-old son and 1-year-old daughter boarded the plane in Basra along with about 60 other Iraqis -- men, women and children. Andy's mother was especially shattered to say good-bye; after losing her husband and Andy's brother, she now fears she will never again see Andy and Alysse and her grandchildren.

The flight from Basra to Amman is pretty short, as the two cities are only about 700 miles and one time zone apart. When the plane arrived in Amman, the passengers were detained at the airport by Jordanian authorities. They were kept for hours without food or bedding or supplies. Finally, they were given devastating news: Jordanian authorities told them they would be deported back to Iraq as soon as a plane arrived, either later that night or early the next day -- an almost certain death sentence for Andy and his family as well as for others in the group. Everyone's passport was stamped "Never to Enter Jordan Again." They were given no reason for this treatment except: "You are Iraqi."

After a few hours Andy was able to borrow a mobile phone with international minutes. He called me, desperate. I asked him if I could speak with a Jordanian official. The Jordanians refused to talk to me. I called and emailed every person I could think of in Amman, including U.S. Ambassador to Jordan David Hale, and in Washington, D.C., but of course it was Saturday and nobody was reachable. Next I called the kindly proprietor of the Toledo Hotel in Amman, at which I'd made a reservation for Andy and his family. I'd already been calling Mr. Barakat for hours, wondering if the driver he'd sent to pick them up at the airport might somehow have missed them. Mr. Barakat in turn spoke to the Iraqi Airways personnel who had flown the plane from Basra, regular guests at the Toledo. The pilots told him this was par for the course nowadays; they would fly in a planeload of Iraqi refugees, and the Jordanians would just ship them all back to Iraq. Iraqi Airways apparently has no qualms about accepting the high airfare from people it knows won't ever reach their intended destination.

The Jordanians then told the Iraqi passengers that they had one other choice than to return to Iraq: They could take a plane to Syria, where they would be "guaranteed" admittance. It was not clear how the Jordanians could speak for Syrian authorities, but Andy decided to take it rather than return to Iraq. I did not hear from him again for 30 hours. When I did, we had a garbled 60-second conversation in which I heard " ... in Syria ... all our luggage gone ... we are OK." The next day we had a decent connection, and Andy told me they'd been admitted to Syria on a 30-day tourist visa that could be extended by 90 days. I passed along the instructions I'd gotten from the U.S. Embassy in Damascus: "Go to the Embassy at precisely 1 p.m. on Tuesday or Wednesday. Otherwise, you'll have to wait until next Sunday."

Andy went for his initial interview on Tuesday and was told it would now take six to eight weeks for his paperwork to arrive from the U.S. Embassy in Amman. When I was working with embassies 20 years ago, we could get a diplomatic pouch from Quito to Manila in less than 48 hours. I guess technological advances have changed things. What worries me now is that Andy will wait weeks, and then we could be told that the papers have mysteriously disappeared and we have to file them all again. It wouldn't be the first time.

Meanwhile, Andy and Alysse and the children are living in a hotel, for which they are paying a princely sum by Iraqi standards. They lost all their luggage -- their entire worldly possessions -- in the Jordan to Amman rerouting fiasco; it was probably stolen in Basra or Amman. Luckily, they had their papers with them. And some things they could buy new: clothing, baby items, toiletries. But they lost many irreplaceable personal possessions: family photos, letters, mementos of his slain father and brother and other loved ones they may never see again. Alysse and baby Fatima are both unwell (they have been since Fatima's birth by Caesarean, without anesthesia or antibiotics, last June) and need medical care. Andy is trying to procure it for them while they otherwise languish in Syria. It is dreadful enough that they have lost their home, their homeland, their society, their loved ones. Now, despite Andy's four years of service to the U.S. government, the family exists at the whim of a callous bureaucracy. Sadly, so are thousands of others.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, translators, denmark

Journalist and activist Maura Stephens first visited Iraq in January and February 2003 and with her husband, George Sapio, published a book, Collateral Damage, about the Iraqi people. Since then Stephens has returned to the country twice and has given scores of presentations about the humanitarian situation as a member of the Iraq Speakers Bureau.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It never ends
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 27, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The nonstop procession, quadruple file in breadth, of Bush, Republican and American atrocities is benumbing. All I can think to say is that I'm sure this Iraqi translators friends will know better than to believe or trust in Americans again. I do. Who wants an American promise?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

heartbreaking
Posted by: Janet4784 on Jul 27, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's all contact our senators and representatives to demand that these employees be given the asylum they need and deserve. Silence implies consent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So?
Posted by: bonapartist on Jul 27, 2007 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My first reaction to this article, and its predecessor, was to shrug.

Where is my compassion?

A week ago I witnessed discussion between an east European dishwasher and Ethiopian cab driver talking about flaws in Marxist thought. Amusing? Not really, Ethiopian has a degree in architecture but as an immigrant his degrees and schooling is not, nor it will ever be, recognized. The dishwasher has master’s degree in politics from British university. Now, the former has landed immigrant status but can work only menial low paid jobs because his education is not recognized (alternative is to pass large quantity of exams - too expensive and labour demanding from a middle aged man), the later cannot obtain immigration papers and will leave North America in a few months (in the meantime supporting himself by working at minimum wage jobs because his current papers bar him from anything else). In effect both economic immigrants are barred from utilizing their education but used to fill the bottom low paid, low skilled jobs of North American economy. Wonderful, no matter what you know or can you are to be hewer of wood and drawer of water. And my little observation happened in Canada, supposedly immigrant friendlier then US.

In conclusion my sympathy goes to people like the two above who are trying desperately to escape poverty and navigate the red type.

I really, truly, and honestly cannot care about the visa/immigration/safety perils of a used up collaborator.

I am sorry but that what “Andy” is - nothing but a collaborator working for the occupying force that destroyed Iraqi state (such as it was) and making the matters much worse then they were under Saddam’s dictatorship. He did it willingly, openly and to the best of his abilities. He did it for ideals or for money (mayhap both), it really does not matter. After WWII even normally peaceful Norwegians executed a number of collaborators, Vidkun Quisling being first and foremost among them. Undoubtedly if he had a journalist advocating his case we would find a lot of things to feel sorry for the man, no matter if he deserved it or not.

Interestingly enough we heard a lot about “Andy’s” peril but almost nothing of his duties for the occupying military. As interpreter was he present and raids or interrogations? How many people ended up in prison due to his actions? How many died or were beaten up by US troops?

Whatever are the answers to above questions it seems that Iraqis have homicidal sentiments towards their quislings and I cannot blame them for that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: So? Posted by: Milo31
» RE: So? Posted by: latteslave
» RE: So? Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: So? Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: So? Posted by: LMNOP
Thank you, Maura
Posted by: Munz on Jul 27, 2007 6:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for staying on this case, Maura. You are a big-hearted lioness and a fine journalist.

As for Bonapartist and his "So?" comment, Andy is a human being in a war-ravaged country with a family to support. No, we don't know exactly what his functions as a translator were, but you presume automatically that he's guilty of a crime without any evidence beyond the knowledge that he facilitated communication. A translator is not necessarily a collaborator. You don't know the circumstances, nor the specifics and therefore your comments are simply cruel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

author responds
Posted by: maurastephens on Jul 27, 2007 9:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Bonapartist" and perhaps other readers are unaware of things that, because of the complexity of Andy's story, didn't get into the AlterNet articles.

Andy and other translators took these jobs with the US government and military because there are few jobs in Iraq for Iraqis. Almost every contracting job to "rebuild" the country after its devastation by US military force four-and-a-half years ago has gone to US or European countries and companies; no Iraqi contractors have been awarded the lucrative rebuilding jobs, which means no Iraqi workers were hired to do these jobs. Official figures still put the unemployment rate for Iraqis in the 35 percent range, but in my experience it is considerably higher than that, approaching 85 percent. There are few options for Iraqis except to take jobs as they are available.

In the case of Iraqis who are fluent or near-fluent in English, a job as a translator/interpreter seemed, in spring and summer 2003, like a fine idea. Things have gotten much worse since then, but when one is forced to choose between a paying job and no job at all, and one has a family, one does what is necessary. That is what Andy did.

Andy was not, as you so cavalierly claim, a "collaborator," nor did he have anything to do with destroying his own country. He was an idealistic young man who believed that the United States would do what it promised to do. He did not work as an interpreter during interrogations; his was more of an office job, and I believe that he would have quit his job, losing the desperately needed salary, rather than do anything that caused someone harm.

You may not be aware that Iraqis, who have been living without electricity for the past four-and-a-half years -- they are now in their fifth summer without any way to cool themselves in the 120-135 degree heat -- do not often get to hear radio, see television, or use the Internet, so most of them have no real idea of just how bad the US government is, or how poorly it treats Iraqis (let alone the people who live within the 50 United States and the District of Columbia), or how imperialistic its intentions are globally. Apparently many people in the USA are also still obvlious to this, but they don't have the solid excuse that people with little access to information have.

Your callousness toward Andy is explicable, perhaps, because you, too, are a victim of lack of information or misinformation. But you have made preposterous leaps of imagination and really have some nerve accusing Andy of collaboration in evildoing. Andy is, in fact, as I described him, a peaceful, loving, poetry-reciting man, thrilled to be a husband and father, who has been caught in a living hell just because of an accident of geography. It could just as well have been you or me.

It is shameful to make accusations of this kind; such a dismissive attitude toward fellow human beings reminds me of decisions being handed down by "executive order" from the White House. It is sad that you cannot find it in your heart to offer Andy's wife and two babies an iota of sympathy. I hope you will rethink your stance, and that you have not lost your own humanity in your justifiable anger toward the US administration. That would be a terrible triumph for the callous individuals who have brought the United States and the rest of the world down this dark road.
----------
When I speak publicly about Iraq I usually start by showing an un-lettered map of the Mideast and asking people to find Iraq. Even in "progressive," antiwar venues, few people can, even now. I urge everyone in the USA to go out of your way to get news from a wide variety of reliable sources, including Iraqi blogs and individuals who have spent time in Iraq or who spend time in regular direct contact with Iraqis. I recommend Dahr Jamail's site, dahrjamailiraq.com, and Electronic Iraq, electronicIraq.net (no "www").

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I cannot feel sorry
Posted by: bornblonde on Jul 27, 2007 10:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello, I am the former wife of an Marine. I am a victim of the war in Iraq. A victim no one talks about or knows about. I was left as soon as my husband stepped off the bus from his second tour in Iraq. Please don't ask me to feel sorry for the translators. They volunteered to help the military. My husband left me for the Iraqi woman he met in Iraq and even paid (with my money) for her to get a visa. She and her family played on his emotions of their subsequent dangerous situation. He was vulnerable and lonely and felt sorry for them.

I was left homeless, pennyless and distraught while he moved her into a home and took care of her. Meanwhile what happens to me? Who cares.....because I am a silent victim that no one cares about. I can be found at bornblonde@hotmail.com I am trying to raise funds for the other silent victims left behind by their spouses. I am not one, but many. The translators knew what their fate might be. I cannot feel sorry for them.

Thank You

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is their last name, to make calls on their behalf?
Posted by: plantland on Jul 28, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could you also post the number you think best for Ellen Sauerbrey at the State. Dept?

Is the situation still dangerous for their family left behind, even though they are in Syria?

Is there an alternate way to refer to them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a c-section with out any pain meds or antibiotics
Posted by: mombot on Jul 28, 2007 6:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That really grabbed my attention. I'm sorry, but I can't help but feel for this family. This is what everyone needs to know about. That there is yet a paperwork quagmire in addition to the war (another quagmire) is just insane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apathy and the American Way
Posted by: guerillaTHOUGHTterrorist on Jul 29, 2007 3:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else can be expected from the world's hyperpower? This government sent America's sons and daughters to become targets in a quagmire that shows no signs of letting up without proper training, without updated equipment and armor. This administration's human rights violations of captured "terrorists" only goes to fuel western hatred in the region. From the botched 9/11 response to the dismal, everyday reality that is this supposed "War on Terror" taking place in Iraq just goes to show the extent that these complacent politicians are willing to go, only to line their own pockets at the expense of not only other people in the world, but from its own citizens as well.

And why should we as Americans care whether or not this "Andy" gets refugee status? By ignoring his pleas for amnesty, we will have to add the death of yet another civilian to the collateral damage that seems to never end, as the US military futilely tries to bring peace and stability to a region that just bucks off any semblance of western control.

Doing nothing for Andy yet another idealogical victory the people that little george likes to call, "them." By leaving Andy to die, we have basically announced to the rest of the world, what they already feel about this nation, that the US is just interested in furthering their own agenda at any monetary or human cost. This reflects negatively on ourselves as the American people. The government should be our servant, but it is treating us like children. We as a people need to make these people in office aware that all of their rhetoric of patriotism, America, freedom, and democracy are lost on us as civilians when the majority of Americans are medically uninsured, our government spends less than a dime for every dollar for education, and the middle class is being eaten up by the poverty line.

Prior to 9/11, The US was among the safest nations within its borders. During 1999 there were only 169 anti-US attacks, with 96 in Latin America, 30 in Western Europe, 9 in Eurasia, and 16 in Africa. The Middle East accounted for only eleven of these attacks. In this year 2007, we now have a basically lawless Middle Eastern state, under only the illusion of control at the expense of blood, spilled from America's sons and daughters by a countless number of IED's and roadside bombs. As long as Americans remain and do nothing for the civilians, the ones George "little man's complex has me using the US military as an extension of my penis and wallet" Bush said he wanted to liberate and bring freedom to, the world's largest and most advanced terrorist training facility will be Iraq.

But really, what else could we have expected this government to have done for a foreigner, especially since the current administration as well as its predecessors have been so incompetent at dealing with the needs of its own citizens?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But, what about?
Posted by: messedup on Jul 30, 2007 11:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who the hell is really in charge of what is going on with the importation of Iraqi's. If we would actually incorporate them into our culture and then treat them to honest military duty outside the one or two that graduate from places like West Point. We could have an army of one for that country, and create some decent Iraqi military pour souls but hey serving your country is a beautiful thing, correct? Put them in a meeting and figure out what the hell is going on. Stop killing so many people who just want to kill right back. I do believe that would be a bad omen for mankind. I grow tired of the the empirical circle we live in. It's one economy against another now, as so many just want to be monopolistic, that method has actually held America back from a go with the tide perspective being that you can't have to many people setting the standard. The smaller countries of Europe don't think from such a shallow perspective I guess.

Now America is investing in military aid to the middle east. I'm tired of the chaos theory. Lets find the live in harmony theory or all continue to perish together just all that much quicker. Although Terrorism seems to be pretty popular in Israel, at one time it didnt go worldwide until quite recently. Even in the 70's, real terrorists were still not into so much bloodletting as they were compromise. They hijacked planes all the time but they never crashed them. My how a few decades can change things. It's not to late to turn back the clock, ok, maybe it is to late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]