Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Recruiter Sexual Abuse: Friendly Fire at Home?

By Aimee Allison, AlterNet. Posted July 24, 2007.


As more women are joining the military, they are becoming the victims of sexual assault before they even take their oath. A former Army specialist explains the growing problem with abuse by recruiters and how the military is turning a blind eye.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Aimee Allison

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A typical poster in the new Army Strong campaign shows three soldiers in full battle gear, faces grim and determined. The middle soldier is a woman.

More money than ever is being spent to convince girls to join the military. I was one of them. The promise of school tuition and job training was attractive to me at the time, but it was just a small part of what it meant to enlist in "this man's army."

To girls seeking a future, recruiters present themselves as a father/friend/guide. But as I, and many other girls discover, these confidants cannot be trusted. Girls become victims of sexual assault at the hands of recruiters even before they take their military oath of allegiance.

But this isn't a story about a few unlucky recruits and a couple of sickos in an otherwise healthy recruitment process. There is a deeper problem of widespread abuse and a system that protects the criminals.

Recently, the Marine Corps announced a court settlement in a suit brought by two Ukiah, Calif., teenage girls who were raped by recruiters during a 2004 military-sponsored event.

The recruiters, Sgts. Joseph Dunzweiler and Brian Fukushima, were court-martialed and demoted but nevertheless acquitted of serious wrongdoing.

According to press reports, the recruiters got the underage girls drunk before the attack. The court settlement has two requirements. First, there must now be female supervision at slumber parties with female recruits. Second, recruiting stations throughout Northern California must post the contact information for confidential advocates available to abused female recruits.

An Associated Press investigation revealed that in 2005 one in 200 frontline recruiters were punished for harassment and abuse. The Army alone had 722 recruiters accused of rape and sexual misconduct in the last decade and called for a recruitment stand down day in 2005. After widespread reports of rape, unwarranted jail threats, cheating drug tests and falsifying documents, thousands of recruiters were ordered to attend ethics training.

In California, Megan's Law has made it easier to track convicted sex offenders. Communities sometimes use this data to run sex offenders out of town, as in the case of Carey Verse.

Yet, military recruiters who commit the same sexual offenses are rarely convicted in military or civilian courts. They are most often given administrative punishment such as reduction in rank or forfeiture of pay. Compare this with highly publicized abuse cases involving Catholic priests. Priests convicted of sexual crimes appear in the Megan's Law database. Recruiters given administrative punishment do not. Ironically, priests aren't fixtures in most public schools but military recruiters are.

Recruiters have unprecedented access to girls (and boys) thanks to the No Child Left Behind Act which demands that public schools turn over student contact data to military recruiters so they can "work their market." In addition, the majority of school districts in the country have relaxed rules that allow recruiters to come and go at will. As a result, more young people have personal and sustained contact with recruiters.

In the wake of severe cuts to extra curricular activities and counseling in high schools, recruiters have filled the void and become a regular part of the school day. With the school's blessing, they give career advice in classrooms, take students on field trips, volunteer during football games and teach physical education. Recruiters can overcome a young person's hesitation to join the military in wartime based on the strength of their long-term relationship -- and this relationship most often begins at school.

Once trust is established, recruiters often take students off-campus to events like the recruitment station slumber party at which the Ukiah girls were brutalized. According to the AP report, sexual misconduct almost always takes place in recruiting stations, recruiters' apartments or government vehicles.

I was once a 17-year-old Army recruit ill-prepared to navigate the male-dominated recruitment system. As I experienced, recruiters wield immense power over teens with their promises of special favors for choice assignments and the authority of their uniform. No one warned me that my comrades in arms might themselves be an enemy. When I was subjected to what can only be called an inappropriate gynecological exam at the downtown Oakland recruiting station, I was too intimidated to speak up for myself.

The Marine Corps settlement is a start. But is doesn't go far enough. A piece of paper posted on a wall in a few recruitment centers won't solve this problem. Female enlistment, making women now 20 percent of the entire military force, is likely to grow.

Unfortunately, the abuse in the recruitment system is prescient of military service, where a third of women who serve will be raped by fellow soldiers. It's high time that girls courted by military recruiters are kept out of harm's way here at home.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: army, recruitment, sexual abuse, marines

Former Army Specialist Aimee Allison is the co-author of the book Army of None: Strategies to Counter Recruitment, End War, and Build a Better World (Seven Stories Press, 2007).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Aimee, how could you have missed...
Posted by: borat99 on Jul 24, 2007 1:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fuk u shima

Man, it should have been obvious!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's terrible
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 24, 2007 2:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You would think joining the army would keep you away from the likes of Joe Francis. But clearly not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In lists of friendly fire incidents (FFI) ...
Posted by: SayBlade on Jul 24, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... these incidents should be included.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't it obvious?
Posted by: alphakat on Jul 24, 2007 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you question the military in any way shape or form, you are unpatriotic. It's currently the place to be if you want to get away with murder...or rape...or anything else for that matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What will it take ...
Posted by: groyne on Jul 24, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... for this kind of behavior to stop? It has to come from the top down.

The Commander in Chief has to issue an order that women shall be treated the same as men by all members of the military.

And, while he's at it, the Commander in Chief can extend this equality to gay men and lesbians as well.

That's all Harry S Truman had to do in 1947 to racially integrate the services.

Of course any change like these must be followed by strict rules about behavior and sure and harsh punishments for those that break them.

Unfortunately, in these days of not meeting recruitment quotas, the hierarchy in the military is probably unwilling to lose any of its recruiters regardless of their ability or actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Playing devils advocate… Posted by: lurchleft
» RE: What will it take? Posted by: groyne
a story to tell
Posted by: lindalee on Jul 24, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once upon a time in the early 80's (I was 21) I had made up my mind to join the navy. I went to the recruiting station and started the process. The two recruiters were disgusting and full of suggestions. They thought they were hilarious. On the way to the recruitment center where I'd take the aptitude test and do the physical the recruiter sold me some bullshit about the passenger door not shutting so he had to hold it for me. His arm rested under my chest for a 20 minute ride. I held my breath. I scored an 89 on the test and they accused me of cheating. On an aptitude test? I wanted to be a airplane mechanic and they told me I'd get my fingernails dirty and that I belonged in an office. It didn't matter that I qualifed for a nuclear technician. So, because they said I cheated I had to take the test again. I got a 93 the second time and told them to go to hell. I went to the air force recruiter instead. This time they didn't want me because of two reasons - I was 5 pounds overweight (I weighed 135) and I had had eczema pretty bad when I was 14 (it wasn't present then). Eczema is not contagious but they acted like I had leprosy.
Needless to say I gave up on my military aspirations. The air force tried to get me back even though I was previously itchy and "fat" but I told them no. I'd had experiences with sexism before but those navy recruiters were the worst. The airforce recruiter was more respectful but he was still sexist. It was an enlightening experience and I learned alot.
An interesting fact back then - women were required to get a 45 on the test and men were required to get an 11.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dear "itchy and fat" Posted by: alphakat
Overlooked resources
Posted by: willymack on Jul 24, 2007 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the Pentagon should give some thought to employing old farts like me in recruting offices. I'm a career Navy man and literate enough to tell some convincing "sea stories", without being deceptive, which would get the attention of prospective recruits. I've been happily married for nearly 40 years, which makes me a poor candidate for a sexual predator. I'm hardly unique in this catagory;there are many more of us out there who would outperform some of the kids currently used as recruiters. We wouldn't even have to wear the uniform. (Let's face it; not many of us would be the dashing figures we were in our youth). Young people still respect erudition and wisdom, which are acquired only through living long years, making mistakes, taking our lumps, and refining ourselves as a result. Am I looking for a job? Hell, yes! Wadda you got to lose?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Overlooked resources Posted by: lurchleft
Solidarity…
Posted by: lurchleft on Jul 24, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I acknowledge that it is most important to blow the whistle when need be I don’t recall ever seeing any positive reports on our troops here at AlterNet.

I recently overheard an interview with Marcus Luttrell of SEAL team 10 who's book, "Lone Survivor” details one of the most courageous and vicious combat operations (Operation Redwing) ever undertaken by a 4 man team… 3 of them died due to a very… for a lack of better words, politically correct decision/mistake they made.

He said to the effect that one of the main differences between us and them is that their media backs them up… it seem like our media is always trying to hang our troops out to dry.

How about those positive stories? How about some solidarity for our nation and its troops? How can you claim to love and support the troops when ever time you turn around it seems like some media is reporting how horrible they are?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Solidarity… Posted by: ezilla
» RE: Solidarity… Posted by: lurchleft
» RE: Solidarity… Posted by: KUCING
» RE: Solidarity… Posted by: lurchleft
» A few bad seeds Posted by: YogiBear
What kind of...
Posted by: lurchleft on Jul 24, 2007 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...sure and harsh punishments for those that break them would be suggested?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What kind of... Posted by: Pirate1
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: lurchleft
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: groyne
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: lurchleft
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: lurchleft
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: What kind of... Posted by: lurchleft
Sexual assault by recruiters...
Posted by: jimmyaj on Jul 24, 2007 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This suggests not just a problem in the military but something more pervasive in American culture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The military considers itself "hyper-masculine"...
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jul 24, 2007 12:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... and the Neanderthalic higher-ups figure that any healthy male with the level of aggression they want in a killer-to-be will go after a healthy young female, as would any older man who sees an "available" young female. It's all a part of the sick warping of the "normal" patriarchal culture of America the higher-ups feels is necessary for a useful military. This is the difference between a citizen-army called into being to defend the country and a standing army of professional designed for imperialism. And for the record, standing armies always turn on the civilian population when they are denied outside enemies.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

la la land
Posted by: unity1 on Jul 24, 2007 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you guys are all in la la land if you think that for women to join the military she is not walking into the lions den of perversioni

holy crap - wake up - the military is the harbringer of desth and destruction they cultivate hate and death - it is a mans army the bastion of male power and from him the ultimate killing and destruction machine

the notion that women are going to be respected within the ranks is a dream - rapes are twice as high in towns where there are miliatary bases and this is true ALL OVER THE WORLD rape is high, nothing gets done it is after all boys being boys -

get a life

a woman does herself and her country a massive dis service by joining the military - that is not equality - killing and trained to kill can never in any sane world be deemed a sort of equality - its male defined equalty - come and kill and be like me a soullesss killer and pervert of alll life

wake up what type of sick society have you all co created by allowing military recuriters to be that ingrained in your childrens school - that is simiply insane and taking patratism to insane lengths

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MY DAD WAS IN THE 103rd IN WWII
Posted by: Roverton on Jul 25, 2007 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He said there's few things lower than a guy who lies you into something HE isn't going to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MY DAD WAS IN THE 103rd IN WWII Posted by: dangerouslysane
RE: More Misrepresentation by faultroy
Posted by: groyne on Jul 26, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously there are no women in the life of this person. His views of them are so skewed and unrealistic that I guess he grew up without "his mother or his sisters or his aunts." (See Gilbert & Sullivan's "Pinafore")

And given his current views, it's a good thing too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I find the abuse unnecessary
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 26, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was a soldier (infantry, sniper) I was super-fit and typically horny for an 18-year-old. But I also looked damn good. I had, and I must repeat, I had, no problem finding girlfriends and getting plenty of sex. Looking back on it now I am a lot older, I can see why. These girls probably thought they landed in nirvana: a buff, good looking guy who is also clean and polite and going somewhere in life. I think it is sad some guys feel the need to deceive to get some. I always found being a fit guy in a uniform pretty well did the leg work for me. Maybe these guys need to relax and let the silent dog whistle that women hear do its work. Just read some books and get a sense of humour. You will never be in the pussy dog house.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progress is being made in spite of Bush
Posted by: Bright Penny on Jul 26, 2007 3:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women have the right to equal treatment in the military, but that does not mean that they are going to get it. Recall how the first women were treated when they enrolled at a military academy.
It was not different for the first women who wanted to be firefighters. Before them, there were the first women in medical school who were treated shamefully.
In my opinion, the answer for women is to simply keep doing what they are doing. Hang in there! Fight on every front--legislative, judicial, political, social and all other. The cost will be very high for many, but there is no choice.
Bush has set women's rights back over the entire globe for perhaps fifty years, and he is not through yet. The Supreme Court is loaded with conservatives for another twenty-five years at least.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slumber parties?
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jul 27, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who in their right mind would authorize a slumber party for female recruits without female supervision?

What the hell does a slumber party have to do with military recruitment anyways?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]