Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

From Smut to Adult Diapers: The Young Novelist's Life

By Vanessa Richmond, The Tyee. Posted July 19, 2007.


A writer's life can seem as glamorous as Paris Hilton's, but for most, the reality is far from it.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Vanessa Richmond

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

With writers such as Zadie Smith and Kiran Desai snapping up book prizes and moving heaps of copy, the young novelist's life can seem as glamorous as Paris Hilton's, just a tad smarter. But the reality for most trying to break into the trade is more long hours on outdated laptops than it is million dollar checks and cocktail receptions.

So why do they do it?

On a recent Thursday, we gathered six young B.C. novelists and asked them just that. Amidst the dingy but lively Legion on Vancouver's hip Main Street, Kevin Chong, Steven Galloway, Anne Stone, Elaine Corden, Michelle Kim and Nathan Sellyn spoke about writing degrees, writing porn and how, despite rain and rents and often rotten pay, B.C. has become a hotbed for Canadian up and comers.

On why B.C. is a hotbed:

Michelle Kim: "I lived in London for a while and worked at the books department at the BBC and brought in a bunch of books by young Canadian novelists like Sheila Heti and Michael Winter, and they just were totally blown away. They'd never seen anything like it. It was completely fresh and completely new. I think in the language there's a simplicity and a clarity and a resonance of universal truths that just gets everyone feeling something."

Steven Galloway: "I think part of it is that Canada doesn't have a mainstream publishing business. There's no giant publisher of smutty detective novels, for example. If you want to be a writer in Canada, the literary example is what you go towards, generally speaking, as opposed to the States and Britain, where they have more markets for more populist forms of writing that you can fall into easily. I mean, to be a science fiction writer in Canada, you have to be extraordinarily dedicated to the idea of science fiction because it doesn't exist for you to just join."

Kim: "When I was in England, we did a program on where is the best place for a writer to live in the world -- looking at things from the cost of living, to whether the culture accepted someone being a writer, to the amount of money you get from grants -- and it was Canada. I thought it would be Ireland, but it was here. And everyone joked they were going to move here."

On being the anti-trend:

Galloway: "I think the perception that nonfiction is exponentially hotter than fiction is a false one. And anyway, for most fiction writers, it's not a choice: You take away their ability to lie and there's nothing left."

Kevin Chong: "They always say that the publishing industry is dying, but they put out more and more books every year. It survives. There are more and more people publishing books and wanting to be writers."

On making pennies an hour:

Elaine Corden: "It's a cliché for a reason: If you're doing it for the money, you're always going to be hooped. People are going to smell that. You aren't doing it to make a living at it; you're doing it because you have to, because there's a story in you that has to come out."

Chong: "I know a lot of people talk about how terrible being a writer is, but it's terrible having a nine-to-five office job that you hate; it's terrible doing a lot of things. And it's terrible not to be able to do what you really want to do. And the fact that you're able to keep writing is a small success.

"Talking about being a writer shouldn't be like talking about having a chronic illness or about how to survive a bear attack."

Galloway: "If you ask any writer who just sold a million copies what they gained, it wouldn't be the million nickels they got from the royalties; it would be the million readers."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: journalism, writing, author, novelist

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Burn down the libraries?!
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jul 19, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
> Writers don't get paid for library books.

Well, first, the libraries do have to buy the books, don't they? It's not like radio stations being given free records. Many of us find out what's new by scanning the New Books section of the library periodically.

Second, those of us who are avid readers often don't make a whole lot more $$'s than writers, and three new hardbacks will now take about $100 to walk out of a store with. And we typically don't have the room on our bookshelves to keep a copy of every book we read; so we use the library as a screening device and only buy those gems that are keepers. It's not a Hall of Fame collection or anything, but it's a 'real' sale as opposed to the empty sales of many pointless best-sellers (I'm especially thinking of the over-hyped celebrity-bio's, Tom Friedman - happy 54th Tom! - etc.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thanks
Posted by: defiant on Jul 19, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Vancouver is cool, and it was a nice little interview. I always remember a quote from a US TV show years back, "thiry something", where a writer said (to the main character, who was taking a writing course) something along the lines of "you have to ask yourself why you're doing this - I have no choice." Being a writer is like that - you have no choice, because it's what you want to do, and other things just suck, no matter how much money they're talking about paying you (unless you're doing it short-term to build savings in order to be free for a while). Writers, truly creative people in general, are in it for the work itself, primarily. I know I am.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: thanks Posted by: DaBear
writers?
Posted by: wleming on Jul 19, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are people who have something to say and those who don't:
but the distinction writer.. could apply to someone
generating crap advertising copy, or a meisterwerk., Interesting
that the academic understandings of things like art and writing now prevail... sad pass for us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK, perhaps he meant that sarcastically...
Posted by: irishairman on Jul 19, 2007 1:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr Galloway - Let's be real. You're likely to sell more copies of first novels to libraries that to the general public. Libraries virtually float the poetry industry in the U.S. - and first novels don't usually sell many more than the average chapbook.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now if we can get immigration to work....
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 20, 2007 5:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been to Vancouver a bazillion times for Hollywood North jobs. It's fantastic. It feels like home to my family who often tagged along on those multi-month jobs. Alas, immigration wouldn't happen (too many teachers and writers already).

A nice set of interviews. It was nice to hear what this little set had to say.. oh yeah, the thing about libraries being Napster... HAH! I agree with the commentors, that most librarians are our best friends.... and just like Napster has been for musicians, libraries do increase a writer's readership (audience) and that means a guaranteed sale next project. It can only help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts."
Posted by: jmooney on Jul 22, 2007 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, maybe it was meant facetiously or sarcastically, but absent that, to suggest that libaries are somehow like Napster is just dumbo. I work for a library in a large city and we have a budget approach a half million for materials purchase. Someone is getting that money; I assume SOME of it gets to the writers. Libraries add momentum to reading in general, and how that can be bad for writers is beyond me.

To quote a famous American Senator, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dear Mr. Galloway
Posted by: pborau on Jul 22, 2007 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If, as many might suggest, you were simply pulling a zany Tristan Tzara-style prank with your comment about libraries, you'd better learn a little more of your chosen craft if you want the effect to ring solid and true. Judging by the whole interview, you probably just don't know what you're talking about. You should be grateful for the fact that your 3rd rate position in a redundant university program is a descendant of the LIBRARY system. The original attraction to students by a university was its scholars/teachers who had prior access to and knowledge of the academy's LIBRARY. Most of the knowledge that ALL civilizations are based on comes from books held in LIBRARIES. Until the printing press, which makes your execrable work (I have tried, and failed, to read it) available to any impulse-buying sucker bored with the newspapers, books/manuscripts were made by hand, one at a time, and were so rare individuals couldn't afford them or were prohibited from owning them. To provide scholarly access, books/manuscripts were kept in a LIBRARY. And please note that one of the greatest achievements attributed to Alexander the Great was not only the founding of Alexandria, but the establishment of its LIBRARY, which was meant to be a gradually expanding storehouse of all human knowledge. Unfortunately it was burned by Christian fanatics who, like you, found something unnecessary if not subversive to the required state of ignorance that can be dispelled by unrestricted access to a well-stocked and impartially collected LIBRARY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ripplit
Posted by: raven5 on Jul 23, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if you keep having your books delivered, and paying no taxes on them, there wont be anymore libraries anyway...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]