Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death [VIDEO]

By Adam Howard, AlterNet. Posted July 11, 2007.


A new film, War Made Easy uses archival footage to show the continuity of the propaganda messages that have been used to to justify war from LBJ to George W. Bush.
War Made Easy

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Adam Howard

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

What's changed in the rhetoric of war since the 1960s? A new film, War Made Easy, explores how media and government spin from the Vietnam era to today has kept America at war.

The film has been adapted from the critically acclaimed book by Norman Solomon, "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death," which was published in 2005.

Norman Solomon is a nationally syndicated columnist on media and politics. He has been writing the weekly "Media Beat" column since 1992. AlterNet spoke with him about the film.

Q: How exactly did this project get off the ground?

A: I'm a writer who's done a lot of radio and occasionally TV, but I'm not a filmmaker. The experience of writing this book was a pretty mind-blowing process for me, and when it was published, I thought about the dimension of archival footage and the media onslaught in favor of war, both past, present and future, for that matter. I'd really admired the Media Education Foundation for a long time. For instance, their film -- Hijacking Catastrophe -- I thought was superb on the neocons' global agenda. So when I talked with people at MEF, they decided to make a film based on the War Made Easy book, and I was thrilled. Eighteen months later, the film is launching this summer, and I'm just really excited about how the analytical, the informational, and the emotional are accessed in this documentary.

Q: How has the response been to the film so far?

A: My hopes have been largely fulfilled during the several screenings I've been to on both the East and West coasts. People are leaving the movie with grief and anger but also motivation to stop the war in Iraq and to prevent the wars that are gleams in the eyes of top officials in Washington.

Q: Why do you think there's so much resistance amongst the media to draw parallels between Iraq and Vietnam?

A: Any geographer will tell you Iraq isn't Vietnam. But the United States is still the United States. The overwhelming issue is how our country continues to drag itself and so much of the world into one horrific conflagration after another.

The pundits and reporters who have the highest profile in this country tend to be eager to see every discredited war as an aberration, and they did the same thing during the Vietnam War. When it became incontrovertible that the war was based on a series of mendacious maneuvers, the response was, "Well, yeah, but that's not what we're like. This is an anomaly." And we're still getting that. It's because "Bush is weird, and Cheney's weird." You even get that from some liberal pundits.

Q: President Bush has said that history will ultimately judge whether of not the Iraq War was a success or failure. Do you believe we'll one day hear people saying this war was a success (as some have with Vietnam) or will people universally deem this a failure?

A: Well, both. It is one of the most horrific war choices ever made out of Washington. There will always be people in Washington and in the media who try to justify the war, or they will say if it had been done differently it would've been potentially a good use of U.S. military power. One of the key points of the film is that the whole argument against a quagmire is a very narrow one, because it begs the question of whether a war based on imperial assumptions and presumptions of empire can be justified? And how can you competently execute an immoral war? How can you do a better job of managing a war that should never have been launched in the first place?

Those kind of questions are not popular amongst the elite media. Quite frankly, if this war had resulted in a military triumph in the middle of 2003, you wouldn't have the July 8 editorial in the New York Times saying it's time to pull the troops out. They would be celebrating this war along with the rest of the media. I think War Made Easy really draws a thread across the last 50 years of U.S. foreign policy and the American warfare state, to find the patterns that have inflicted so much suffering. It's what Martin Luther King Jr. called "the madness of militarism," and it hasn't stopped yet.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq war, vietnam war, war made easy

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How's your memory?
Posted by: kbest on Jul 11, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you recall these quotes;

"Saddam Hussein is a threat and needs to be removed"---Bill Clinton
"I give my vote for war with conviction"---Hillary Clinton
"Saddam Hussein used WMD's numerous times and will use them again"-----Madeline Albright
"In the case of Saddam Hussein, a regime change is needed"----John Kerry
" Saddam Hussein is a despot and needs to be removed"---John Edwards

There are so many, I could go on and on. I've seen the replays. I have all these comments on videotape.
How soon the American people forget that these comments were based on the known intelligence at the time. The same intelligence that was given to both presidents Clinton and Bush during there respective terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How's YOUR memory? Posted by: kc10ken
» RE: How's YOUR memory? Posted by: christee
» RE: How's YOUR FACTS Posted by: SJ
» RE: How's YOUR FACTS Posted by: braxxian
» RE: How's YOUR memory? Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: How's your memory? Posted by: lorenkahle
» RE: How's your memory? Posted by: swinney
» RE: How's your memory? Posted by: garyinthailand
» RE: How's your memory? Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: How's your memory? Posted by: sea4th
» RE: How's your memory? Posted by: edgar_michel
» Clinton Did It Posted by: TruthBeTold
Bushcronium is discovered...
Posted by: kelly.nickell on Jul 11, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
• NEW ELEMENT "Du" DISCOVERED
A major research institution (probably funded by a government subsidy) has just announced the discovery of the densest element yet known to science. The new element has been named "Bushcronium". Bushcronium has one neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy neutrons, and 224 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 311.

These particles are held together by dark forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons. The symbol for Bushcronium is "Du", as the symbol "W" was already taken by Tungsten.

Bushcronium' s mass actually increases over time, as morons randomly interact with various elements in the atmosphere and become assistant deputy neutrons in a Bushcronium molecule, forming isodopes.

This characteristic of moron-promotion leads some scientists to believe that Bushcronium is formed whenever morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as "Critical Morass".

When catalyzed with money, Bushcronium activates Foxnewsium, an element that radiates orders of magnitude more energy, albeit as incoherent noise, since it has 1/2 as many peons but twice as many morons.

The "nucular" reaction alluded to below where Du combines with Foxnewsium (Fx) when bombarded by a moron beam yields: Du + m (morons) + Fx = DumFx which is sometimes phonetically pronounced to describe the nature of the isodope produced.

Although Faux Noise is the only “news” element mentioned in the formula, any other “news” element, i.e., CNN, ABC, CBS, WoPo, WSJ, etc., could be used just as well and get the same isodope.

Not my writing, but someone out there has hit it squarely, helping us understand a little better why we are being spun to death - including folks that should have known better when they were spun by the redhouse on WMD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bushcronium is discovered... Posted by: edgar_michel
As a supposed 'christian' nation, we sure don't act like it . . .
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Jul 11, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . nor do we understand what it says: you get what you ask for but it may not be what you bargained for . . .


10So Samuel spoke all the words of the LORD to (K)the people who had asked of him a king.
11He said, "(L)This will be the procedure of the king who will reign over you: (M)he will take your sons and place them for himself in his chariots and among his horsemen and (N)they will run before his chariots.

12"(O)He will appoint for himself commanders of thousands and of fifties, and some to do his plowing and to reap his harvest and to make his weapons of war and equipment for his chariots.

13"He will also take your daughters for perfumers and cooks and bakers.

14"(P)He will take the best of your fields and your vineyards and your olive groves and give them to his servants.

15"He will take a tenth of your seed and of your vineyards and give to his officers and to his servants.

16"He will also take your male servants and your female servants and your best young men and your donkeys and use them for his work.

17"He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his servants.

18"Then you will cry out in that day because of your king whom you have chosen for yourselves, but (R)the LORD will not answer you in that day."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Christian Nation"
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Jul 11, 2007 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Claiming we're a Christian nation is like pissing into the wind. Your going to get wet with your own yellow excreta!

We are a Nation of killers. WE LOVE TO KILL! There are thirty thousand gun deaths every year. Our Nation is defined by WAR. We don't do diplomatic solutions anymore. We issue ultimatums then invade!

There is a deep sickness in this society that loves war and killing!
We, as a nation, won't be fulfilled until we reduce every "non-democratic" nation to a dirty field of bleached bones and dried blood discolored soil. I'm so fucking proud!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Christian Nation" Posted by: borat99
War Spin
Posted by: swinney on Jul 11, 2007 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been recorded that on over 100 times Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld-Rice used Saddam and 9-11 in the same sentence.
In one speech Bush used it eight times.
It is the power of Word Association to Deceive the listener.

It was not only WMD--It was Saddam/9-11--Saddam/OBL--
Saddam/terrorism.

WMD--Saddam son in law wrote that they had destroyed all wmd after the Gulf War. It was on the second page of his letter. The administrtion used only the first page where he said Saddam had an interest in developing wmd.

Saddam's Chief Chemist fled to Canada and was prominent in Canada saying they had destroyed all wmd after Gulf War.

The administration kept him off our TV.

Scott Ritter-Hans Blix--told us over and over there were none and they needed only a few months to complete their inspections

President Cheney and his vile PNAC would not wait.

They had Chalabi in place as President.

THERE WAS NO NEED TO ATTACK AN IMPOVERISHED NATION.

CAN YOU SPELL--I S R A E L.---O I L

The PNAC monsters even had meetings on how they could internationalize the middle east oil with USA supplying firepower.

Hell awaits their evil souls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War Spin Posted by: freethink7
» RE: War Spin Posted by: sea4th
» RE: War Spin - Thanks sea4th Posted by: freethink7
What About This Insidious Spin: Why These New Warnings of Another 9-11 (Al-CIA-da) Style Attack
Posted by: freethink7 on Jul 11, 2007 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far, there have been at least four loud-mouthed cretins spewing blather and drivel about forthcoming 9-11 style attack on U.S. soil. But, for what?

a. Kick off Iran war (they certainly will blame Iran for another attack to justify invading Iran). Or Americans just too vociferous about Iran – Americans have been adamant: we will not support war against Iran!
b. Whip this country into shape and otherwise intimidate citizens so we will continue to support evil-vile Neocon-Rethug agenda
c. Subtle insidious psychological warfare propaganda warnings that indeed there will be another 9/11
d. All the above

I don't trust any of these neocon thugs - something's up with this new psychologically based propaganda spin re: another 9/11.

ChertoffGutFeeling

RudyGiuliani

DennisMilligan

RickSantorum

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nam Iraq good cop bad cop
Posted by: solrev on Jul 11, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People seemed to be afraid to compare Nam and Iraq because we lost in Nam. So the spin from day one was that they are different we can win in Iraq. Any idiot should have realized that we were doomed to lose in Iraq for the same reason we were doomed to lose in Nam. We lost because the national homeboys would never quit no matter how many puppet governments we create. What amazes me, is that, how did two different governments manage to get us into two different ism wars? In Nam the government was playing dominos and had to stop communism from spreading throughout Southeast Asia. Other than this philosophical fear position there did not seem to be any economic reason for us in Nam. In Iraq however there is little doubt that the bushmobile invaded Iraq for economic reasons or as they say, “it is in our best interest”. From saving the world from the red menace, to hell lets just go for the dough, seems like a long way down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exclusive patriotism Posted by: Melvin
Petro-dollars - The REAL reason for the Iraq War
Posted by: Matt Piner on Jul 11, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a cut and paste (below)-- much has been written about this, but once you read it, the answer is so simple and irrefutable. Just google "Petrodollars" and do your own research. It's all about the Oil and the Dollar: Once Sadaam announced he would only sell Iraqi oil in Euros, he sealed his fate....The rest is, of course, B.S. and spin.

From http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html --
(Written before the war started...)
Although completely unreported by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking -- it is in large part an oil currency war. One of the core reasons for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves. The second coalescing factor that is driving the Iraq war is the quiet acknowledgement by respected oil geologists and possibly this administration is the impending phenomenon known as Global "Peak Oil." This is projected to occur around 2010, with Iraq and Saudi Arabia being the final two nations to reach peak oil production. The issue of Peak Oil has been added to the scope of this essay, along with the macroeconomics of `petrodollar recycling' and the unpublicized but genuine challenge to U.S. dollar hegemony from the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency. The author advocates graduated reform of the global monetary system including a dollar/euro currency `trading band' with reserve status parity, a dual OPEC oil transaction standard, and multilateral treaties via the UN regarding energy reform. Such reforms could potentially reduce future oil currency and oil warfare. The essay ends with a reflection and critique of current US economic and foreign policies. What happens in the 2004 US elections will have a large impact on the 21st century.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Devious Dub-ya: Liar in plain sight.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 11, 2007 2:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Extracted from today's Los Angeles Times.

"Bush again links Iraq war to Al Qaeda"
July 11, 2007


By describing the U.S. effort in Iraq largely as a struggle against Al Qaeda, President Bush on Tuesday reached for a familiar — but widely questioned — way of defining the war.

"The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is a crowd that is now bombing people" in Iraq, Bush said. "The killers who came to America have said, with clarity, we want you out of Iraq so we can have a safe haven from which to attack again."

Bush's remarks echoed an administration effort to establish links between the Al Qaeda terrorist network and Iraq that began before the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

Insurgents affiliated with the group that calls itself Al Qaeda in Iraq have been involved in many attacks in that country. But the CIA, Pentagon and other experts have debated the group's role in Iraq and its ties to Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.

Al Qaeda in Iraq is one of several Sunni Muslim insurgent groups. U.S. and Iraqi officials have blamed it for many high-profile attacks. A Pentagon report late last year, however, said that Shiite Muslim militias, not Al Qaeda, were the largest threat to security in Iraq.

End of Times extract.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran and editor of the nonprofit investigative website, King-George.biz, which features 50 cartoons, photos and other Bushwhacking illustrations plus the only hardcopy proof of White House corruption ever found on the Internet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: KISS Posted by: Melvin
ZEITGEIST - we need a new one
Posted by: mcooley on Jul 11, 2007 3:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of you folks taking sides in the phony contrived battle between the GOP vs DEM have been distracted and duped - divided and conquered - just like Sunnis and Shiite have deliverately been in Iraq. America is being stolen, just like Iraq - by the same people....just without all the bloodshed.
Please take a moment to check out this video - that does a great job in line with the subject video:

How much longer do you want to be a chump waiting for the sucker punch?

Watch Zeitgeist Final Cut - Part 3 here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=497251819335380093

Then watch Zeigeist Final Cut - Part 2 here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7160790539111319889

Then watch Part 3 AGAIN so it really sinks in.

Sorry to break the bad news - but all that money you are trying to make for "security" is not going to save you....unless you can figure out how to eat it.

Please check this out and share with everyone you know.
Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who's protecting who? Posted by: justaguy
The DOLLAR WILL CRASH
Posted by: SJ on Jul 11, 2007 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simple if Iran pulls this off it cold make the dollar crash and make the EURO the world currancy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The DOLLAR WILL CRASH Posted by: willymack
» RE: The DOLLAR WILL CRASH.....$EURO Posted by: Captainmagic
» I'd love to see it. Posted by: justaguy
Hello Slaves
Posted by: braxxian on Jul 11, 2007 5:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats, Replblicans, they are all the same. They are all paid for by big business and have little free will of their own. The American people are slaves to the ruling elite. They will make war, lie, cheat, and do whatever they like because YOU let them do it. The American people have the most massive power in the world, the power of the people. Unfortunatly yoy don't have the balls or brains to use it. So suck it up my American buddies, enjoy your dictatorship, becuase until you do something about it that's all you will ever have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1984
Posted by: Melvin on Jul 11, 2007 6:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Say it again folks...1984.
Now repaeat after me.nineteen eighty four, 1984.
Ok the dates are off but the reality is not.
OOOO how about this heavy thinkers! Animal Farm without the Commies!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 1984 Posted by: willymack
» RE: 1984 Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: 1984 Posted by: Roverton
» RE: 1984 Posted by: edgar_michel
impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

technocrat
Posted by: technocrat on Jul 15, 2007 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much easier can war be made - for the agressor? Consider the "Reaper", the new robotic bomber that can now deal death and destruction remotely, its "pilot" seated at a computer 7000 miles away!

Who is to blame for the wars? Who profits from them? I think we all know that, the financial elite for whom every intelligence (?) agency in the world works, and continues to fan fires of strife around the globe. It is a proven fact that, more than any other "cause", a nation of people will allow themselves to be sold into debt if they can be made to feel threatened. No one knew this better than Hermann Goering, Hitler's right hand man.

And no one knows the power of the Money Masters better than the engineer of the Federal Reserve, J. P. Morgan. Consider his words: "Capital must protect itself in every way [war included, of course]...Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principal men now engaged in forming an imperialism of capitalism to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd."

Dividing the people. Fighting over questions of no importance. Anna Nicole's baby. Paris Hilton's jail sentence. Whose NASCAR "hero" can burn up fuel fastest going nowhere? Whose NBA hero has forged the fattest contract? On and on, ad infinitum.

Give it up. The America we were indoctrinated into from Day One is a myth, just like the brave cowboy killing off the red savages to save the good white families in distress. Just like "Leave it to Beaver". Freedom? What freedom? The people of this nation are so far under to the bankers, to the tune of over $45 trillion, that they will NEVER be free. And when the true nature of this leveraged economy rears its ugly head, and the entire nation is foreclosed upon, that's when the people will finally wake up. And of course, milliions of them will blame those damned tax-happy liberals. And those who don't, and become demonstrative about removing the corporate scoundrels from any position of power and influence, will be rounded up in the name of "national security."

Silent Americans, you get what you deserve. Those who speak out from conscience - you'll get it too, what you don't deserve, and sooner.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wrong, Wrong, Wrong
Posted by: tjkenn on Aug 9, 2007 1:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your assertion that "these comments were based on the known intelligence at the time," is in error. I am just a school teacher, not an intelligence expert, but I seriously doubted that these claims were true.

Why? Because I get my information from diverse sources not just Fox News and the New York Times. I read Scott Ritter, former UN weapons inpector, and listened to Hans Blix, the Chief weapons inspector in Iraq for the United Nation, who both refuted the claims of the bush administration and its cooked intelligence.

The Italians, French, and German governments did not think that Saddam had WMD's. Their intelligence services as much as said so.

The idea that "everyone thought Saddam had WMD's" is a fallacy that the right likes to perpetuate even though they are aware that it is inherently untrue.

Whether or not the individuals you quoted in your post were willing to look beyond the veneer is another matter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]