Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Opposition to American Oil Grab is Unifying Iraqis

By Ben Lando, UPI. Posted July 12, 2007.


Washington says a new Iraqi hydrocarbon law has the potential to unite Iraqis. That may be right, but not in the way White House planners had hoped.
oilwell
oil well

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Ben Lando

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

U.S. President Bush may be right: Iraq's oil law, although highly controversial, could be a "benchmark for reconciliation."

When Iraq's council of ministers last week suddenly approved the law, critics of various stripes united in opposition. Shiite and Sunni political parties alike denounced it, vowed to defeat it, even threatened to ensure Parliament can't take it up. It is seen by some as weakening the central government and giving too much to foreign companies.

Iraq depends on the sale of oil for the vast majority of its federal budget. It's infrastructure badly needs investment to boost production. A law governing the world's third largest reserves -- and a sizable amount of natural gas -- has been as elusive as security there.

In one attack alone Saturday in the northern city of Tuz Khurmato, nearly five times as many were killed than at the Virginia Tech massacre in the United States.

In the midst of a war zone of more than four years old, the Bush administration itself could be the most divisive agent. And, it's the White House's support for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's administration, as well as the heavy pressure on it to pass the oil law, that could draw together the fractured country.

The fate of and fight for control over Iraq's oil is the same for the country itself. At issue is to what extent the federal government, as stewards of Iraq as a whole, will decide oil policy. Local governments, especially the Kurdistan Regional Government, disapprove of strong central control; their suspicions rest on memories of Saddam's Iraq, where the central government's uneven investment hand benefited only some, and its heavy hand brutalized the rest.

Much more oil is in the ground than being pumped now, that's likely why a law governing the oil has been held up in the United States as the tool for grand compromise, leading toward the path of more hand-shaking.

President Bush himself, as well as U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker, Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, in separate meetings in Washington and Baghdad are all regularly urging the passage of the law.

KRG and federal government negotiations on the oil law began last summer. Deals were reached and stalled since late February. Then Tuesday the ministers approved it.

"It has to be a package of laws in which all the Iraqis can agree, which is why it is a benchmark of national reconciliation," a State Department official told UPI in May, adding that's why revenue sharing is the main emphasis of the U.S. government. Revenue sharing would be decided in a revenue sharing law, not the oil law, two of four laws that comprise the package. The revenue sharing law is to be taken up this week by the ministerial council.

The oil law already faced opposition from Iraq oil experts -- including two of the law's three original authors -- as well as the powerful oil unions. The unions say they're willing to stop production and exports if the law gives foreign oil companies too much access to or ownership of the oil.

"The last four years have witnessed repeated attempts at dismantling the basis for any well planned resources management for the whole nation, only to replace it with market oriented destabilization and fragmentation policies that are at variance and in competition with each other and the national interest," said Tariq Shafiq, an Iraqi now living in Amman and London, tasked last spring by the Iraq oil minister to co-write the law. It was subsequently altered in negotiations and he now opposes it.

"Would this law really optimize the management of the oil and gas? Would it really unite the country?," Shafiq said. "I believe sincerely it is naive to think it would."

"It's really important to challenge the notion that the law is going to unite 'warring factions,'" said Ewa Jasiewicz of the London-based campaigner Platform. "The language in which the law is being couched and reported is incredibly sectarian and is creating de facto Sunni, Kurdish and Shiite regional power blocks in the imagination and political landscape and, in the process, the conditions for the creating of these kinds of facts on the ground."

Many political parties opposed Maliki's government before the oil law. As security in Iraq diminishes, so does the political strength of Maliki's coalition of Shiites -- many backed by Iran -- and Kurds.

The ministerial council just barely had quorum last week because of boycotts of key Shiite allies and Sunni parties. Parliament was supposed to take up the oil law Wednesday but boycotts and chronic absenteeism scrapped that.

The Sadr Movement and the Iraqi Accord Front now say they may end the boycott specifically to challenge the law. The former held mass rallies over the weekend in opposition to Maliki. IAF says it will call for a vote of no confidence in him.

The Association of Muslim Scholars issued an edict against any Parliamentarian approving the law. Off the record talk by campaigners, unionists and oil experts express the need to turn up the heat of opposition.

Last week the Iraq Freedom Congress -- whose motto is "Working for a Democratic, Secular and Progressive Alternative to both the U.S. Occupation and Political Islam in Iraq" -- teamed up with the new Anti Oil Law Frontier to rally masses against the law.

All the while a coalition in Iraq grows. It encompasses Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds and secularists. Its goal is to keep Iraq together. But it also wants an end to the U.S. occupation.

"They are also strongly opposed both to the terrorist forces of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) and to the growing influence of Iran in Iraq," Robert Dreyfuss wrote of the opposition in The Nation.

Despite sharing two key tenets of the war on terrorism, the United States isn't supporting the coalition.

State Department Iraq Coordinator David Satterfield, answering questions in March about what has been self-termed the "National Salvation Government," vowed support for Maliki's government. "It is not helpful to talk about alternatives," he said.

But alternatives may force themselves into the conversation, especially on the heels of the oil law.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, oil, oil law, nationalists, unity government

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Republican's Abuse of Power
Posted by: shangrilalad on Jul 12, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republican's Abuse of Power

From Nixon, Reagan to Lil Bush we have seen a reoccurring theme of Republican lawlessness and systematic abuse of power. Isn’t it about time we asked, “Are all republicans sociopaths?”

Republicans have turned our government into a dictatorship in all but name only. Once independent federal agencies have been corrupted and subverted into Republican fiefdoms answerable to no one but the president. Bush’s never seen a covert plan to increase his power by violating laws and the Constitution, he didn’t adore. This power mad monkey has no respect for our troops, our people, our country, or the rule of law. He is a sociopath.

Bush’s ascension to the throne began with a crime committed by the Republican dominated Supreme Court’s decision to appoint him president. And it’s been followed by an unprecedented Republican Crime Spree ever since. Nothing apparently bothers republican voters but illegal aliens, abortion, gays and sex scandals. They are oblivious to a multitude of crimes too numerous to list, committed by Bush and Republican Congressmen. Not war profiteering, war crimes or stolen elections. For republicans there is no law but the Law of the Jungle.

Cheney/Bush lied us into an unwinnable, illegal and insane war with less planning than a White House Easter Egg hunt. One would think we might have learned a lesson in Viet Nam, where we didn’t win with half million troops surrounded by millions of Vietnamese guerillas. If Republicans had had their way, we’d still be fighting in Viet Nam, and still losing. The same applies to Iraq. We can bomb them into the stone age, but we can’t dominate their people.

Why has no national news agency (or the Monopoly Media) called for Bush’s impeachment?

Why has no national leader called for Bush’s impeachment?

The answer is simple, they justifiably fear him and the Almighty Republican Establishment.

But how did things get to the point that the American people fear elected and non elected (Rupert Murdoch for instance) criminals and tyrants?

Are we not "the land of the brave and the free?"

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublican's Abuse of Power Posted by: JSquercia
» I don't accept that at all. Posted by: justaguy
Are We Not?
Posted by: the islander on Jul 12, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this point in our history my answer to the question "Are we not the land of the brave and the free?" is self-evident. The answert is 'no'. It's not our ideals that make us brave and free, no matter hos freqently stated. It's our actions. Our ideals have to be embodied -- lived.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Olde Europe's take on the plan to separate Iraqi from their oil.
Posted by: cognitorex on Jul 12, 2007 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"OLDE EUROPE:" DID THEY KNOW THEN WHAT WE KNOW NOW?
(from cognitorex May 2006)
.
Iraq is such a cockup, so ill conceived, so poorly implemented, so internationally ill received, so inflaming and offering such dismal short term prospects.
I think back to the Spring of 2003, to this illustration of the hubris and myopic capitalist intentions of our rush-to-war leaders.
George Bush, in a meeting with Gerhard Schroeder and Jacques Chirac, lays the down-and-dirty on the line. He says, "Look guys, if you don't join me in this war you're not getting any of the post-war goodies. No oil field contracts, no reconstruction contracts, nothing, we'll keep it all for ourselves."
Jacques and Gerhard huddle with their aides for a moment and then smilingly respond. "Our loss is your gain, big buddy, we're going to pass."

Labels: Bush Admin, criminal incompetence, Iraq, oil

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why we fight...
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Jul 12, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This new oil law make is clear.

We haven't been fighting for freedom. We don't fight for security.

Even ousting Saddam wasn't important, or a new government, or anything they tell us. The reasons change every couple months, but it's all lies and propaganda.

We fight for power and profits.....and an excuse for the politicians to restrict our liberty here at home.

Dennis Kucinich has been quite outspoken on this. Some further reading:

"Revealed: Why Your Sons and Daughters Died in Iraq" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The corruptive nature of American oil companies: A personal observation.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 12, 2007 9:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the benefit of new AlterNet visitors, this is a repeat of a prior comment I made in regard to U.S. petroleum companies and their ties to Iraq.

In 1956, before entering the Air Force, I worked as a seismologist for the Atlantic Refinery Company (ARCO). By doing so, I followed the footsteps of my late father, Ed Scott, a career geologist and high level executive for Union Oil of California, now Unocal. Decades later, in 2004, I wrote about Dad in my narrative nonfiction book, George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, to point the destructive influence oilmen have had on U.S. foreign policy.

I already knew Bush and Cheney had worked in the petroleum business before winning the White House. But imagine my surprise upon learning that our UN ambassador and former Iraq ambassador, Zalmay Khalilzad, had been a Unocal consultant.

Also noteworthy was Khalilzad’s membership in the neocon front organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), along with Gulf War 2 architects Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Scooter Libby. President Bush is connected to PNAC through his brother, Jeb, an original member.

Another PNAC founder, Steve Forbes, has publicly stated that he wants the IMF out of Iraq and private oil companies in.

Getting back to Khalilzad, in addition to his Unocal relationship, he was a Chevron board member. When Bush 41 was president, Khalilzad worked for Wolfowitz in the Defense Department. Prior to Gulf War 1, both men advocated the use of military force to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

After Khalilzad left the DOD, he worked for the Rand Corporation, a rightwing think tank that performed research for the U.S. military, DOD and American intelligence community. Not surprisingly, Unocal was also a Rand client.

While consulting for Unocal, Khalilzad participated in talks with the Taliban on Afghan oil and gas pipeline infrastructure, escorted a delegation of Taliban leaders that visited Unocal headquarters in Texas, and called for the United States to support their regime.

During the Clinton years, Khalilzad conducted risk assessments for Unocal on their proposed 900-mile pipeline project to transport natural gas from Turkmenistan to Pakistan through Afghanistan. Even as the Clinton administration began to recognize the repressive nature of the Taliban regime and its links to Osama Bin Laden, Khalilzad called for U.S. engagement with the Taliban.

Unocal also hired Henry Kissinger and former U.S. ambassador John Maresca for advisory work. Marcesca later became a Unocal vice president.

Additionally, Unocal employed Robert Oakley, former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, as a Middle East consultant.

Another former Bush administration official, Richard Armitage -- PNAC member, Valerie Plame leaker and Colin Powell’s Deputy Secretary of State -- also performed Unocal contract work. No stranger to the pipeline business, Armitage was a member of the Burma/Myanmar Forum, a group that received major funding from Unocal. In 1997, he was implicated in a lawsuit filed by Burmese villagers who suffered human rights abuses during the construction of a Unocal pipeline. Halliburton, under Dick Cheney, also performed contract work on the Burmese project.

I could go on and on about the White House being controlled by oil company executives, but instead, I will relate the feelings expressed by my father, as told to me many times.

The influence on government energy policies by petroleum companies would have concerned him greatly. If alive today, Ed Scott would be the first to say that oilmen are greedy people, care little about social issues and pledge loyalty to themselves, not the U.S. Constitution. To me, that pretty much sums up the Bush administration and why we are quagmired in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are dead-on correct, Wells. Posted by: HughScott
BULLETIN: America's lying, fear-mongering, commander-in-chief did it again.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 12, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today at his White House press conference, President Bush connected Iraq to 9/11 and blamed nearly all the violence on Al Qaeda operatives even though they commit less than five percent of the terrorist acts.

To drive home the blatant falsehood, Dub-ya mentioned "Al Qaeda" 39 times. Conversely, he NEVER spoke the words "civil war" or "insurgents," adding one more distortion to his growing list of transgressions, fabrications and outright lies -- such as:

Bush’s falsified White House biography.
So-called Iraqi WMDs.
"Immediate" threats.
Yellow-cake uranium.
Aluminum tubes.
Mobile biological weapons labs.
Ties to Al Qaeda.
A 9/11 connection.
The Valerie Plame/CIA leak case.
Forgiving Scooter Libby’s prison sentence for perjury and obstruction of justice.
Secret overseas prisons.
Torture.
Warrantless wiretaps of United States citizens.
Phony Al Qaeda plots.
False claims that America is safer now from terrorism than before 9/11.
Failing to safeguard our border with Mexico.
Seeking amnesty for illegal immigrants in return for votes and cheap labor.
Concealing the real cost of Gulf War 2.
Destroying the combat effectiveness of National Guard and Ready Reserve troops.
Sending them into Iraq with obsolete body armor and unprotected Humvees.
Understating Iraqi civilian casualties.
Embellishing U.S. successes in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Misrepresenting the only wartime tax cut in American history.
Economically betraying senior citizens, the middle class and working poor.
Downplaying global warming.
Bush going on vacation during Hurricane Katrina while fellow Americans drowned in New Orleans.
Vetoing stem cell research for religious reasons.
Censoring the U.S. Surgeon General for the same purpose.
Claiming wounded GIs got the best treatment possible at Walter Reed.
Preventing the coffins of returning GIs from being seen by the public.
Hiding injured Iraq veterans from the press after landing stateside.
Declassifying intelligence information for political purposes.
Firing U.S. attorneys for the same reason.
Obstructing justice by destroying White House emails, allowing AG Gonzales to lie before Congress, claiming Cheney isn’t part of the executive branch and refusing to let former White Houses staff members such as Harriet Miers testify before Congress.

The first item on my list was reported by the Boston Globe on February 28, 2004.

Headlined, ”Bush Bio on Web Inflates Guard Service,” the Globe story told how I scooped thousands of Web-surfing journalists by finding a fabricated presidential biography someone in the White House had inadvertently posted on a State Department website.

For AlterNet visitors unfamiliar with George W.’s fabricated Guard history, the State Departmemt document claimed he flew F102s almost SIX years when the actual time was 27 months. The text contained other misrepresentations as well -- all intentional, not typos or mistaken dictation.

For example, the falsified bio asserted that Bush spent four years helping to keep two F102s on strip alert. In truth, he was only qualified for alert duty 22 months and the last 60 days were plagued by pilot problems attributed to poor airmanship, excessive drinking and a rumored fear of flying.

To learn more about the “Bogus Bush Bio Caper,” visit the nonprofit website, King-George.biz, which features 50 cartoons, photos and other Bushwhacking illustrations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the meantime, Alternet could do America a favor by
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 12, 2007 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posting articles encourage their readers to fighting for the following actions from government:

1. Legalize and allow INDUSTRIAL HEMP to penetrate the market even if it means replacing petroleum all the way.

2. Fund and make affordable alternative renewables such as solar, wind, geothermal, hemp, tidal, etc ...

3. Fund and make public transportation more affordable and enjoyable so that people will not be encouraged to drive their gas guzzlers. Hint: Light rail.

4. Stop condescending people for not conserving and make conservation more motivating and rewarding.

5. Make business, media, and government reform a high priority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stay strong, Iraqis
Posted by: delia on Jul 12, 2007 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope this resistance to the oil law prevails. If the West wants Iraqi oil they can pay for it like everybody else. I also hope that Chavez is lending moral support: his deal to own his own resources and make some money off his oppressors is the model that Iraqis should be emulating. If all the oil producing nations followed suit, our Western governments will have no choice but to get behind some real energy alternatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George finally comes through!
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Jul 12, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the Iraqis are all together in a solid bloc of opposition to a law telling them how they should divvy up their oil profits, huh? Well, didn't George start out by telling us that he was "a uniter, not a divider?" Hey, it may have taken him a while, but damn if he didn't hit that particular ball right outta the old park!

As for the likes of Bush, Cheney, et al., urging the passage of their brainchild oil law: when that happens, you'd better make sure that the inevitable attached string isn't in the form of a noose, and pointed straight in the direction of your neck. Which is precisely what will ultimately happen to the passers should they be foolish enough to actually allow this piece of blatant extortion to pass. But that extortion, unless I've been watching the wrong war, is precisely why Bush, obdurately and stupidly, is dead but refuses to lie down. He went in for the oil and he simply will not come home without it. (There's only so much his intellect can process.) So he will go on insisting that we "stay the course" (nudge-nudge) when he's very well aware that all he's accomplishing is the creation of today's casualty list. And he will go on mouthing the same bullshit to the Iraqis about revenue sharing (wink-wink), while mentally anticipating the day when the globalized market will devise a way for the Big Oil Boys to rob the ungrateful little bastards blind.

The President of the United States is an amoral, imperialistic swine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it Just me?
Posted by: etisoppa on Jul 12, 2007 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it just me or are their others out there who have the feeling they have just witnessed / are witnessing one of the slickest con jobs ever pulled? Is it just me?

I have heard of this group of con-artist community in the US, the Travelers? (Gypsies?/Celtics? I think) Maybe the Think/Stink Tanks first did one of those in-depth cerebral analysis of these people in operation first and then applied what they learnt to the "Iraq Project".

Started off with the 1-2 shuffle slight of hand " WMD! Shook and Awe into Arc of Democracy! Transform Middle East!" when all along they wanted to Balkanize the damn country ( and region).

"Let us give it to someone with a technocratic mind, good on the detail planning of a war, don't really know squat about post-war peace planning, and make sure we isolate him from those who knew. He has to do it in secret." That was Gen. Franks.

Ignore recommendations on troop strength. " Hey! That might actually work. Look, w have got other plans. Plus, our Defense Secretary has a new doctine he wants to test/prove"

All the things we were warned not to do by those in the area ( Jordanians, the Saudis etc. ) we are going to do exactly that. Disband Iraqi police army etc plus a host of other things.

We are going to rush in with top advisors and Senators visiting the Babylon archeology site, and making all manners of religious imputations. And then pretend ( or really don't ) get it when the country changes from its secular to religious base. Now those stories of US and Brit mainly undercover units setting off bombs to create contentions now make sense. It was the Balkanization Plan.

And all the "Senators" who knew all about this "plan" all along. And now that the plan is a success we are going to declare failure and pull the troops out. The final part of the Sting is a good old-fashion shake-down, Capone style. See our Surge can work, so give us the oil or else we will leave and leave you to the mercy of these criminal/terrorists gangs we are "trying" to stop. And everyone is right on queue. Talk about slick!

But there were Iraqis all along who saw thru this all along. The only country that is suppose to have an oil deal that is not the norm for that region!? l.

What I can’t figure is how they figured on getting the oil out of the country. Bury all the oil facilities, pipelines, plants and all, underground and man it with robots?

What do they care if Balkanization means condemning these people to the rule of Medieval Minds? “Hey! A breeding ground for Terrorist will play directly into the MO we are going to use to rule and maintain power.” Oh how slick are the slick.

Is it just me who has this feeling?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Al Qaeda Boy / Backup plan Posted by: etisoppa
» You're nuts. Posted by: yellow
OK So what to do now?
Posted by: etisoppa on Jul 12, 2007 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK so the Stink Tanks on the Bush Syndicate have gotten us into a fine mess.

American may have finally started to say " No." and started to standup to the Consortium's MO. "We are not going to be ruled or manipulated by the politics of Terrorism"

What we don't want is another "failed state" . ( Maybe the schemers had not thought this out fully and that the real opposition in the US would start to be effective) But we want our troops out now. What to do. Some things that cross my minds are:

1. The Iraqis need a grass roots-up media "Town Meeting" to work through their political social and emotional issues and arrive at some understanding at the people's level of the sort of country and society/country they want and why are the factions/"insurgents" doing thus. Maybe cell phone texting could be a novel means. ( I was so shocked when it became fully apparent, by the time Baghdad fell that such things were not part of the initial planning. US solders to defend the Oil Ministry but none deployed for the Interior Ministry where the records on Saddam’s victims, and future catharsis program, was kept., was a dead give away that no such real post-war planning was done as we now all know)

2. Withdraw our troops. Retreat a deployment to the Kurdish part in the north. There we will quickly train and equip an Iraqi Army with a police arm, properly drawn from the entire country, then have them re-invade the lower section to establish control. The "Surge" will not work until a properly functioning Iraqi army and police can take over in any event.

Then let us not go breaking any more countries on some wild-eyed Stink Tank schemes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kill Humming Hummers
Posted by: richholland on Jul 13, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from the caspian sea a big oil pipeline goes through turkey and koerdistan to the mediterian sea.
There a huge american base watches the blood of the brave and free.
Gentlemen;
Europe is building his High SpeedTrains 30% energie of the competing airplanes but the USA donot have or will have a similiar system.
The Europe confederation has taken measurements and has legeslation to change the peakoil and coalproduction in jointventures of coorporations and States.

The city of Amsterdam will have aCARless Sunday on 23 of september.
I am convinced soon you will solve the problems if you understand that profitmaking at all costs has some risks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

impeachment
Posted by: gsaephanh on Jul 13, 2007 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Call in your vote TODAY for impeaching Bush and Cheney at this number: 202-225-0100

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office is taking calls voting for Impeachment of Bush/Cheney at 202-225-0100. PLEASE CALL TODAY. At the toll free capitol switchboard #s below, you can also call your particular district’s congressional representative to insist that they support impeachment for Cheney. E.g., for Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s H Res 333 for Cheney; please say:

“In addition to supporting Kucinich’s bill H Res 333, I would also support a similar Impeachment Resolution against Bush, especially after the disgraceful Scooter Libby sentence “commuting” and the following issues: wiretapping, torture, numerous 9/11 intelligence misrepresentations, the continued occupation of Iraq, gross negligence during Hurrican Katrina, the Valerie Plame CIA leak, […list your other grounds…] ..”[see resolutions on tab #2 for other grounds for impeachment]).

LANIC requests that Americans call today…Not tomorrow or next week. Every call adds to the extraordinary grasswoots and nationwide movement’s pressures on House Speaker Pelosi to act now .before further innocent lives are lost in Iraq and elsewhere. Last week 28 Americans lost their lives. Over the July 4, 2007 weekend over 400 Iraqis lost their lives…

SEND MAIL TO HOUSE SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: Attn: Nancy Pelosi, House Representative/Speaker of the House, 235 Cannon H.O.B., Washington, DC 20515 ; Pelosi’s Fax # 202 225-8259

Pelosi’s e-mail address :

Americanvoices@mail.house.gov

CC her at: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

Please send her a pro-impeachment email and a specific call to endorse H Res 333. Note: On Saturdays/Sundays, Pelosi’s office has a comment line at which you can leave a voicemail. Your message will be transcribed and relayed to her. Please do encourage your family/friends to contact the same number. Refer them to www.bcimpeach.com for the actual telephone #s & contact info.

Find out who your Congressional representative is and call that person. For toll free numbers to your Congress rep: (800) 828 – 0498; (800) 459 – 1887; or (866) 340 – 9281. You will be connected once you name your congress person. The staff aid should take detailed notes and provided to the Congressional representative.

Final Note: Please say “I support Impeachment based on ____. I’d like to know where “[representative name]” stands on this issue.” Let’s strike while the Libby fury keeps the iron hot! Please call and Act Now!

PLEASE ALSO CONTACT THESE KEY CONGRESSIONAL REPS RE IMPEACHMENT:
Representative Capitol Phone Capitol Fax
Howard Berman 202-225-4695 202-225-3196
& 818-944-7200 818-994-1050

MAILING ADDRESS FOR BERMAN
Congressman Howard L. Berman
14546 Hamlin Street, Suite 202
Van Nuys, CA 91411

Henry Waxman 202-225-3976 202-225-4099
Loreta Sanchez 202 225-2965 202-225-5859
D. Watson 202 225-7084 202-225-2422
LindaSanchez 202 225-6676 202-226-1012
L. Solis 202 225-5464 202-225-5467
A. G. Eshoo 202 225-8104 202-225-8890
L. Roybal/Allard 202 225-1766 202-225-0350

http://www.bcimpeach.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement