Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Male Sportswriter Returns To Work As a Woman

By John Ireland, In These Times. Posted August 1, 2007.


When Mike became Christine, she gave Los Angeles sports fans a courtside view of gender politics.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by John Ireland

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

For all of its trappings of money, fame, and corruption, professional sports has a lot to do with character. Avid sports fans seem to respect those who face up to overwhelming challenge and overcome adversity. So it should not come as a surprise that readers rose in solidarity when a 23-year veteran sports writer announced in the Los Angeles Times that he would return from a short hiatus ... as a woman.

On April 26, Mike Penner wrote what he thought would be the toughest article of his career. "I am a transsexual sportswriter. It has taken more than 40 years, a million tears and hundreds of hours of soul-wrenching therapy for me to work up the courage to type those words." The piece ran in the Sports section, next to his regular column.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Penner's story was "by mid-evening, one of the most heavily viewed stories on latimes.com in the last year, with about half a million page views." Nancy Sullivan, executive director of communications for the newspaper, says "There was a massive response to this story, not only on our website, but across the media spectrum." The online message board accompanying the article was closed to comments in less than 8 hours, with 800 comments logged in. Hundreds more messages were sent via e-mail. Responses to the revelation came in three distinct flavors: kudos from sports fans, effusive thanks from other transsexuals and rants from bible-thumpers. Readers' initial shock, however, subsided almost immediately.

Michael Daniel Penner returned to work on May 23 as Christine Michelle Daniels. So far, it appears to be smooth sailing. But Daniels' very public transition has put a spotlight on a culture that is slow to acknowledge, let alone attempt to rehabilitate its ingrained intolerance and bigotry.

Translating her world

"The concept of one day having to come out publicly, as an LA Times sports columnist, was a paralyzing fear that, looking back, kept me from transitioning at least 5 years sooner," Daniels tells In These Times. She says she was "bracing for the worst."

Many of Daniels' colleagues have gone out of their way to champion her cause. "Some sportswriters," she says, "have written column items of support, some who know me pretty well have spoken to others on my behalf, without my knowledge, delivering the message that, 'This is just another writer, a normal person, facing a difficult challenge.'"

Sports blogs almost uniformly expressed admiration for her courage and wished her well. Overall, readers seem to be mildly bemused, but focused on her return to work. One commenter summed up the majority consensus: "Yea yea yea and all that girlie stuff, no problema. ... But how 'bout them Angels this weekend? Gonna get back to bizz? Need you back Christine."

Some response has been negative. It's difficult to assess where it originates -- within the sports community or those drawn by the spectacle. TheAngryT.com, an obscure sports blog, rants, "I am a straight male ... Do you care what I look like or whether I wear high cut panties out of the Sears women's wear catalogue? LA Times readers should no longer look for Mike Penner's column when they want hard-hitting sports journalism."

Sportswriters frequently express passion and enthusiasm for their subject, exposing more personality than reporters covering different beats. They often develop loyal followings and become a trusted voice that keeps readers up-to-date. In a world of high ticket prices, the sportswriter functions as the reader's passport to the field, court or stadium. For Daniels, this connection to her fans, and the known quality of her writing, may have smoothed her transition.

"I just always liked the spark in his writing, his wit and his use of language," says fellow Southern California journalist Joel Beers. "Penner's done a lot: covered the Olympics, wrote about media, NFL lead writer. But, after 23 years, it'd seem he'd be a dean of the Times sports section as opposed to just another very good writer in a section that has a lot of them. I always wondered why he seemed to bounce from beat to beat but never got what would seem to me the choicest of assignment: columnist."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gender, mike penner, christine michelle daniel, los angeles times, sportswriter, transsexual

John Ireland covers progressive politics and social dynamics in the United States, exploring "democracy in action." He has been published in numerous periodicals, including In These Times, Newsweek, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Baltimore Sun and the Advocate. He can be reached through his blog, http://www.JohnIrelandBlog.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Quality prevails...
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Aug 1, 2007 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some years ago, a Real Madrid soccer player, Guti, had a relationship for some months with a famous transexual actress, Bibi Anderssen. He refused to even aknowledge reporters questioning him about her gender and continued appearing with her in public whenever he wanted.

Back then, many sport fans here in Spain though he was killing his own career, just as it was beggining (he was barely 20 and she was over 40). But 10+ years later he is still on the starting team and a regular to the national team. In the end, quality matters. The same fans who shout racist insults at one player from the opposing team, would hang posters of black players from their own team; After all, the shirt colors run deeper than your skin's.

If Christine is good writer and delivers as usual, she will prevail too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Quality prevails... Posted by: InformationPlease
There's a big difference
Posted by: White Middle Class American Male on Aug 1, 2007 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Between accepting homosexuals and excepting transgender. Most people I associate with don't really care who a person goes to bed with. But that doesn't mean that if Mike wants to cut his dick off, put on a dress, and become Michelle, my relationship with him (I choose that pronoun purposely) would remain the same.

Are there people in the gay community that have issues with transgender?

Sorry if I refuse to embrace every niche demographic out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: El Hombre Malo
» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: freeda'all
» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: LeslieGem
» Why is this intolerant post the "Editor's Pick"? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» "Google chicks with dicks"? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Let me get this "straight"... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Thank you so much! Posted by: hagwind
» Star Gone Missing Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Star Gone Missing Posted by: freeda'all
» RE: Star Gone Missing Posted by: hagwind
» HEY, FREEDA'ALL! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: hellofriends
» Individual Solutions R Us Posted by: hagwind
Naturism, gender neutral language and attitudes will help ...
Posted by: aouie01 on Aug 1, 2007 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naturism (variant of nudism), gender neutral language and attitudes will help people not be unnecessarily focused on the gender of another. It may also reduce the number of people who physically change their sex for reasons other than wanting to appeal to people (or a person) who are more attracted to a different sex.

There are some people with both male and female genitals (hermaphrodite / intersexed), while a smaller number of people actually try to unsex themselves (nullification). People who don't want to be male or female shouldn't feel so pressured to fit into a category.

Christine may be biologically and legally female, but not genetically. A day may come when one who was genetically male can become genetically female, but the person would not be "naturally female". It shouldn't matter for the most part if a person is male, female, both, somewhere in between or neither. But, to the extent it does to some people, I personally consider it dishonest to refer to a person who was born a male or female, as though they were of the opposite sex (it would be dishonest to refer to a transsexual as a male or a female). People can consider themselves to be whatever sex they want to consider themselves as. When communicating the information to another, if the other is likely to infer incorrect information, then that would be a misleading communication whether or not it is legally, or technically the correct answer. It is a good thing that I generally don't make a reference to gender and hence I can be around transsexuals without them being offended by my views on honesty and gender identities. I once found myself in a bind when someone specifically asked about the sex of a person who was transsexual. The hesitancy did imply that I could not say male or female. Since I like to presume confidentiality on such issues, I have resorted to generally answering any questions about the sex of another, with strange answers like "I believe the person is legally male" or "the person considers self as female, and presents self as female and would like to be considered female".

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Competition and genetic advantages
Posted by: aouie01 on Aug 1, 2007 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ideally, if people wanted to find out who were the best people at a a particular task, they would try to find that out regardless of gender, race, etc.

Given that the top athletes in most sports tended to be males due to genetic difference between males and females, some people found it wise to separate competitions by gender. It is clear that the intent is to separate the contenders based on the genetic makeup as male or female. Though the language may be based on the legal definition, the intent should be taken into account.

That being said, I would like to point out the wrongs of the system. What about genetic predispositions to be fat, short, tall, muscular, or other characteristics that would give huge advantages or disadvantages in some sports? Just like they have weight based categories for boxing, weightlifting, etc., shouldn't there also be different categories for running, jumping, throwing, etc.? There is some value to finding out the maximum, minimum and average / median / common capabilities of humans in many different areas, but there are better ways to determine those, than through the current world of organized sports competitions with all their unfair genetic discriminations or (more appropriately) the unfair lack of genetic discriminations. I do value improving physiques, but there are better ways to do that.

The unfair genetic discriminations or the unfair lack of genetic discriminations or (more appropriately) the unfair benefits based on genetic predispositions, is not limited to the world of sports, but is ingrained in the fabric of most societies (e.g. genetic predispositions to be able to memorize better resulting in better grades, resulting in a better job, resulting in better pay, ...).

In nature, genetic advantages does often translate into increased likelihood of being better off, but as we build societies it would make sense to prioritize rewarding efforts over rewarding luck or genes.
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christine Daniels Is One Tough Lady
Posted by: felixcommi on Aug 1, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to be amazed at the level of courage it takes to transition when you are a sports writer in America. It is an incredible story.

Onto those reluctant to employ the word she. When we use the words women, she, her, lady, mam, etc, we are not evoking meanings about the chromosomal framework or biological intricacies of sexual females. The concept of women often evokes social meanings tied to gender.

Gender exists in specific social, hsitorical, and cultural contexts. I would not be considered a real man 200 years ago. I would be an absolute weirdo and abberation. I have a penis but my affeminite tendences and respect and consideration for the parity of women and trans folk would be disgraceful.

Concepts of gender constantly change. Some cultures do not even have genders. Our social behaviour is not tied to our genitals. Little girls do not play with easy bake ovens because they are natually inclined to domestic servitude. Rather, domestic servitude was a necessity fo early capitalist development (see.. unpaid labour). We could easily train young children to belive any variety of acitivites are naturally suited to them.

It really is no big deal to call Christine a she. Considering how calculated and fabricated gender is, maybe we should not call anybody he or she, as to distinguish based on gender and social behaviour is intellectually lazy and perpetuates antiquated notions of biological determinism better suited for the backwards 1930's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TIps for gender-neutral or genderless communication in English.
Posted by: aouie01 on Aug 1, 2007 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gender doesn't and shouldn't matter where it ought not to matter. Try to use genderless references consistently. Over time it becomes natural with rare slip ups.

English though significantly flawed (compared to non-existent "ideal" languages) is the most widespread language at the moment. Sometimes a word that doesn't exist in the English language may need to be used for consistent gender-neutral language. When there is no need to fight the English Language don't.

Nouns instead of 'he' / 'she' / 'his' / 'her': Rather than using a plural term 'they' for 'he' or 'she', my personal preference and recommendation is to skip singular third person pronouns as much as possible. When a possible confusion could arise with pronoun references (when three or more candidates are present), it is normal to use a noun instead of the pronoun. E.g. John, Jane, and Joyko went to the park, and Joyko bought John a cruelty-free non-dairy ice cream that John and Jane relished greatly. If Jane was removed from the previous sentence, then I wouldn't change any other words (that is I wouldn't substitute a pronoun or the words former or latter for John or Joyko). Most people would presume John is a male and only a few would inquire about Joyko's gender. Over time, people get used to the avoidance of third person singular pronouns (though I still occasionally slip and use my former preferred gender-neutral pronoun "it", much to the displeasure of others and my subsequent displeasure).

Substituting 'self' for 'himself' or 'herself': It is an odd sounding but correct usage. E.g., Joyko washes self about twice a week.

Gender-neutral nouns: Spouse, parent, child, sibling. We can either fight dictionaries with policeperson, postperson, fireperson, humanpower, etc., (terms which are quite acceptable in society) or not fight dictionaries with other socially acceptable terms that are also dictionary friendly such as police officer, fire fighter, postal worker, human-power (or human power).

Descriptive reference: Parent's sibling, sibling's child, dear person (or simply Hey You), (instead aunt / uncle or nephew / niece or Sir / Madam) etc.

Commonly presumed to be genderless references: Often, I (and many others who prefer genderless references) will lean towards common presumed gender neutral terminology rather than scientific, made-up, or other uncommon terminology. E.g. actor, bartender, cow, dog, etceteras (some of these words are defined without reference to gender in several dictionaries). You could use bovine, canine, but I wouldn't recommend it. If you are picky or touchy about words like actor or waiter, then you could substitute "person whose profession is acting" or "the person whose profession is / was waiting at my table at the specified restaurant" but, I would suggest the less descriptive reference when it can be accurately interpreted as a gender neutral reference. Over time as people notice that you are using gender neutral language (for the most part), they may either understand that actor and waiter was meant in a gender neutral way or may try to pinpoint your error, which is your chance to explain it.

Many words become part of "official" English even if the number of people who use it are far fewer than the people who push for genderless references. While it is true that several different variations exist (e.g. I try to avoid pronouns altogether to stay consistent with proper "official" English even though it initially sounds odd, while some use made-up words like "hir"), there is a large portion of the English speaking population that often use genderless references (unless there is a need for a gender reference). It is high time "official" English included some options for genderless references.

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accepting the transgendered
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immaturity by straights and even gays leads to idiotic assumptions about the trans community. People forget how fluid sexuality is in the animal kingdom, where some animals engender both sexes, reproduce with no male present, or change sex willy nilly. That humans might be fluid in their gender identification is clearly obvious. People who remain trapped in the limitations of gender role and make excuses for their fixation are a sad lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]