Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Male Sportswriter Returns To Work As a Woman

By John Ireland, In These Times. Posted August 1, 2007.


When Mike became Christine, she gave Los Angeles sports fans a courtside view of gender politics.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
What if People Actually Treated Religion as Just a Metaphor (Like Trekkies and Secular Jews)?
Greta Christina

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
15 Signs American Society Is Coming Apart at the Seams
David DeGraw

DrugReporter:
When It’s Crunch Time at College, Students Turn to Adderall
Erik Hayden

Environment:
20 Weird, Crazy Ideas for Helping the Earth

Food:
The War on Soy: Why the 'Miracle Food' May Be a Health Risk and Environmental Nightmare
Tara Lohan

Health and Wellness:
Pharmaceutical Giant Paid $500,000 to Psychiatrist Who Used Chicago's Poor as Guinea Pigs
Christina Jewett and Sam Roe

Immigration:
Dobbs' Resignation Was Long Overdue
Janet Murguía

Media and Technology:
Is Right-Wing Media Hustler Trying to "Blackmail" Obama's Attorney General over ACORN Videos?
David Edwards, Muriel Kane

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
New Right-Wing Craze: Using Bible Quote to Pray That Obama’s 'Days Be Few'
Amanda Terkel

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Hey Guys, Don't Want Kids? A Vascetomy Is Probably the Way to Go
Anna Clark

Rights and Liberties:
Economic Crisis Is Getting Bloody -- Violent Deaths Are Now Following Evictions, Foreclosures and Job Losses
Nick Turse

Sex and Relationships:
How Abstinence-Only Programs Perpetuate Dangerous Stereotypes
Martha Kempner

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Poseidon's Financial Shell Game: Why Is a Private Desalination Plant Asking for Public Money?
Peter Gleick

World:
Army Sends Mom to Afghanistan, Infant to Protective Services
Dahr Jamail

More stories by John Ireland

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For all of its trappings of money, fame, and corruption, professional sports has a lot to do with character. Avid sports fans seem to respect those who face up to overwhelming challenge and overcome adversity. So it should not come as a surprise that readers rose in solidarity when a 23-year veteran sports writer announced in the Los Angeles Times that he would return from a short hiatus ... as a woman.

On April 26, Mike Penner wrote what he thought would be the toughest article of his career. "I am a transsexual sportswriter. It has taken more than 40 years, a million tears and hundreds of hours of soul-wrenching therapy for me to work up the courage to type those words." The piece ran in the Sports section, next to his regular column.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Penner's story was "by mid-evening, one of the most heavily viewed stories on latimes.com in the last year, with about half a million page views." Nancy Sullivan, executive director of communications for the newspaper, says "There was a massive response to this story, not only on our website, but across the media spectrum." The online message board accompanying the article was closed to comments in less than 8 hours, with 800 comments logged in. Hundreds more messages were sent via e-mail. Responses to the revelation came in three distinct flavors: kudos from sports fans, effusive thanks from other transsexuals and rants from bible-thumpers. Readers' initial shock, however, subsided almost immediately.

Michael Daniel Penner returned to work on May 23 as Christine Michelle Daniels. So far, it appears to be smooth sailing. But Daniels' very public transition has put a spotlight on a culture that is slow to acknowledge, let alone attempt to rehabilitate its ingrained intolerance and bigotry.

Translating her world

"The concept of one day having to come out publicly, as an LA Times sports columnist, was a paralyzing fear that, looking back, kept me from transitioning at least 5 years sooner," Daniels tells In These Times. She says she was "bracing for the worst."

Many of Daniels' colleagues have gone out of their way to champion her cause. "Some sportswriters," she says, "have written column items of support, some who know me pretty well have spoken to others on my behalf, without my knowledge, delivering the message that, 'This is just another writer, a normal person, facing a difficult challenge.'"

Sports blogs almost uniformly expressed admiration for her courage and wished her well. Overall, readers seem to be mildly bemused, but focused on her return to work. One commenter summed up the majority consensus: "Yea yea yea and all that girlie stuff, no problema. ... But how 'bout them Angels this weekend? Gonna get back to bizz? Need you back Christine."

Some response has been negative. It's difficult to assess where it originates -- within the sports community or those drawn by the spectacle. TheAngryT.com, an obscure sports blog, rants, "I am a straight male ... Do you care what I look like or whether I wear high cut panties out of the Sears women's wear catalogue? LA Times readers should no longer look for Mike Penner's column when they want hard-hitting sports journalism."

Sportswriters frequently express passion and enthusiasm for their subject, exposing more personality than reporters covering different beats. They often develop loyal followings and become a trusted voice that keeps readers up-to-date. In a world of high ticket prices, the sportswriter functions as the reader's passport to the field, court or stadium. For Daniels, this connection to her fans, and the known quality of her writing, may have smoothed her transition.

"I just always liked the spark in his writing, his wit and his use of language," says fellow Southern California journalist Joel Beers. "Penner's done a lot: covered the Olympics, wrote about media, NFL lead writer. But, after 23 years, it'd seem he'd be a dean of the Times sports section as opposed to just another very good writer in a section that has a lot of them. I always wondered why he seemed to bounce from beat to beat but never got what would seem to me the choicest of assignment: columnist."

It would seem that Daniels' bravery has yielded that opportunity twofold. She has two columns: Day in L.A., which the paper describes as "a daily column on the sports events, personalities and themes that matter most to Southern Californians," and Woman in Progress, a blog on latimes.com in which she chronicles her transformation, comments on the angst that accompanied her public "coming out," and describes re-connecting with friends and colleagues she had kept at a distance since beginning hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in December.

Her first few weeks of posts indicate that each blog retains its distinct focus. Based on the heavy traffic to both blogs, much of her original audience has stayed on, in order to catch a glimpse of her personal journey. Daniels is making sports history by creating a space where questions of intolerance and bigotry can be posed and, through online comments, discussed.

Daniels knows that the average sports-page reader experiences cognitive dissonance when imagining a man donning a wig, a dress, pumps and lipstick to head out for a day at the mall. In a recent post, she related why many male-to-female "transwomen" are focused on the exterior. "We never had a girlhood. We missed out on all the fun (dolls, sleepovers, mother-daughter outings) and the rites of passage natural-born females take for granted. ... [It's] just a normal part of growing up female."

Her employer's approach to the situation helped normalize Daniel's gender-switch. When she revealed to her supervisor, Sports Editor Randy Harvey, that she would be transitioning, he insisted that she write the piece in order to stay in control of the story. Some critics thought that personal narrative belonged in the Op Ed section and not in the Sports section. Others believed she should be fired. One post to a blog sponsored by CBS SportsLine.com put it this way: "When a reporter makes himself the story, which he is clearly doing, he is definitely not serving the interests of his reading public and quite honestly should be fired for these ego-driven actions."

In the majority of states, being fired would be a distinct possibility. In February, the city of Largo, Fla., fired its city manager of 14 years after he revealed his plans to undergo sex reassignment surgery, also known as SRS. California, however, is one of the eight states (along with Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Hawaii, as well as Washington D.C.) that have passed laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity. Oregon will join the list on January 1, 2008, and the legislatures of Vermont, Iowa and Colorado have passed bills that await their governors' signatures.

An unexamined culture

Traditionally, the sports world is quick to minimize and ignore issues of bigotry when they arise and instead "focus on the game." In so doing, it misses a chance to discuss the issues and identify the underlying symptoms. Some would sweep Daniels' revelation under the rug in order to maintain the status quo and avoid what might be unsettling self-examination.

U.S. sports history is rife with examples of a pervasive culture of racism, sexism and homophobia. Football commentator Jimmy "The Greek" Snyder was fired by the CBS network in 1988 after describing on the air how African Americans were naturally superior athletes because they had been bred to produce stronger offspring during slavery. The words that got him fired were, "During the slave period, the slave owner would breed his big black with his big woman so that he would have a big black kid -- that's where it all started."

Although primarily criticized as racist, Don Imus' April 4 reference to the Rutgers University women's basketball team as "nappy headed hos" revealed an insidious sexism that has been at the core of the sports world's resistance to professional female athletes. Just months before, retired NBA player Tim Hardaway was suspended from participating in NBA publicity events after saying on a local radio show: "Well, you know I hate gay people, so I let it be known. I don't like gay people and I don't like to be around gay people. I am homophobic. I don't like it." Homophobia has persisted like a healed-over injury that acts up when gender roles are challenged.

"That culture is very real," says Daniels. But she sees her proactive "coming out" and the i> blog as an opportunity for fans to examine their discomfort with transsexuals in sports. Her blog holds up a magnifying glass for those who are willing to peer through it.

Daniels is in the process of getting new press credentials from local teams. "I have not ventured into a press box or locker room as Christine yet. But soon," she said with anticipation. "Most of the publicity directors from the local pro sports teams have contacted me to say, 'Welcome back, Christine, we look forward to working with you.'"

Transsexuals in sports

Daniels is not the first transsexual to emerge from the sports world. In 2003, Chris Kahrl, sportswriter and founding columnist of the annual Baseball Prospectus, the gold standard for baseball analysis, became Christina. At the time, Kahrl wrote, "nobody has batted an eye," calling sports "the ultimate American social bridge," transcending "race, gender, class, and culture." The history of transsexuals as sports players, however, hasn't always borne out such triumphant optimism.

In 1972, Richard Raskind reached the final of the men's national 35-and-over tennis championships. Three years later, he underwent sex-reassignment surgery, becoming Renée Richards. In 1976, the U.S. Tennis Association denied her entrance into the U.S. Open. In 1977, the New York Supreme Court ruled in her favor, allowing her to reach the doubles final at that year's competition. She went on to coach Martina Navratilova to win two of her 20 Wimbledon championship titles.

For nearly 20 years, women's golf, which has a significant number of lesbian players and fans, has excluded transsexuals from competition. Two years after transsexual Charlotte Wood placed third in the U.S. Senior Women's Amateur in 1987, the U.S. Golf Association (USGA) added a "female at birth" clause in its entry forms and many other golf organizations around the world followed suit.

In 2004, however, the Australian Ladies Professional Golf Association (ALPGA) reversed its 1991 "female at birth" decision and allowed Mianne Bagger to join. Bagger, who was born male and had SRS in 1995, was ranked sixth on the national amateur circuit before turning professional in 2004. She currently plays on the ALPGA and Ladies European Tours. Bagger's success has had an international impact, as well. In 2005, the USGA changed its policy, allowing transgender athletes to compete in the U.S Women's Open. The same year, the Ladies Golf Union did the same, which allowed Bagger to play in the Women's British Open.

And in May 2004, the International Olympic Committee published its "Stockholm Consensus," outlining eligibility for participation in gender-classified competitions. It states that eligibility of transgender athletes to compete should begin no sooner than "two years after gonadectomy," that "verifiable" hormone therapy has been administered, and that "legal recognition of their assigned sex has been conferred by the appropriate authorities."

Changing medical consensus

The confusion manifested in the sports world over transsexuality is understandable when one considers the lack of settled opinion in the medical world. Much has changed in the past 50 years and definitive classification is still in flux.

The term "transsexual" entered popular parlance in the '50s to describe a person who identified and often presented as a member of the opposite gender. In 1980, the American Psychological Association added "Transsexualism" to its Diagnostic and Statistics Manual (DSM-III). In 1994, the group replaced the diagnosis with "Gender Identity Disorder" (DSM-IV). The term "transgender" emerged around the same time to describe those with unusual gender identities without psychopathologizing them as "disordered." This is considered an umbrella term covering all types of "gender dysphoria," which literally means being uncomfortable with one's gender.

Medical professionals have different opinions as to the appropriateness of hormones, surgeries, transition counseling and even conversion therapy, which would seek to reverse the gender dysphoria and reconcile the individual to his or her biological gender. Treatments can cost between $15,000 and $50,000 and are not covered by most U.S. health insurance policies. Many countries that have comprehensive nationalized health care, including Canada and most European countries, do cover the cost of treatment, to varying degrees.

Surgery and legal recognition

Legal recognition of gender change varies around the world. In the United States, only Idaho, Ohio and Tennessee prohibit the change of sex on a birth certificate. Every province in Canada permits this, as do most western European countries. The latter, however, require proof of a diagnosis and HRT, in addition to SRS. Spain requires proof of HRT for two years, but not surgery. Germany will grant the official change of gender only if the person is unmarried, permanently infertile, and has had surgery changing the "outer sexual characteristics." The United Kingdom requires only that the person prove s/he suffers from gender dysphoria. Japan will grant the legal change, but only if the person is unmarried and childless. Australia is one of the few countries that will issue a new birth certificate, as opposed to amending an existing one.

Thailand has become a haven for inexpensive SRS procedures for transsexuals from around the globe, making it a hotspot for this type of "medical tourism." Ironically, Thailand does not grant changes in gender in official records for its own citizens.

The small town of Trinidad, Colo., is known as the gender reassignment capital of the United States, due to the work of former Army surgeon Stanley Biber, who specialized in the surgeries in the late '60s. Before his death in 2006, he estimated that he had performed 5,800 such procedures and trained hundreds of other surgeons. The International Foundation for Gender Education estimates that more than 30,000 Americans have undergone SRS.

Unlike the rest of the Muslim world, Iran sanctions SRS, as it has been valid under Islamic Shariah since Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa in 1983. Since homosexuality is punishable by death, however, it appears that surgery is the only option for many who might otherwise be hanged for being gay. As a result, an unregulated and marginally underground surgical industry has developed, leaving in its wake many post-operative patients who are not technically transsexual.

Life goes on

Discussing her public transition with In These Times, Daniels acknowledges that hard work lies ahead. "The overwhelming warm, positive and supportive response I have received has done much to buoy my spirits and get me emotionally prepared for the next career hurdle: covering sporting events and interviewing athletes and coaches as Christine," she says. "You know, for more than 20 years now, I have been a woman sportswriter going into locker rooms all the time. Only then, nobody, myself included, realized it."

Daniels will likely remain an expert in two realms. On her Woman in Progress blog, she will continue to share her own journey and transition from male to female, educating and provoking thousands of casual onlookers, while providing support and comfort to those on a similar journey. In her "Day in L.A." column, she will remain the first stop on many a fan's morning read-through of the Sports section, continuing to digest and contextualize the world of sports with her characteristic wit.

In a recent blog entry, Daniels addressed, if indirectly, the many questions people have asked about the extent and timetable of her transition. She wrote, "Gender identity is not about genitals. It is about what's in your head and in your heart. I am not taking a vacation to have SRS. I am taking a vacation to have a vacation."

Regardless of what comes her way, Daniels will do what she does best: churn out 2,000-plus words a day that speak to her readers. For reporter and reader alike, there's not much better than that.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, mike penner, christine michelle daniel, los angeles times, sportswriter, transsexual

John Ireland covers progressive politics and social dynamics in the United States, exploring "democracy in action." He has been published in numerous periodicals, including In These Times, Newsweek, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Baltimore Sun and the Advocate. He can be reached through his blog, http://www.JohnIrelandBlog.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Quality prevails...
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Aug 1, 2007 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some years ago, a Real Madrid soccer player, Guti, had a relationship for some months with a famous transexual actress, Bibi Anderssen. He refused to even aknowledge reporters questioning him about her gender and continued appearing with her in public whenever he wanted.

Back then, many sport fans here in Spain though he was killing his own career, just as it was beggining (he was barely 20 and she was over 40). But 10+ years later he is still on the starting team and a regular to the national team. In the end, quality matters. The same fans who shout racist insults at one player from the opposing team, would hang posters of black players from their own team; After all, the shirt colors run deeper than your skin's.

If Christine is good writer and delivers as usual, she will prevail too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Quality prevails... Posted by: InformationPlease
There's a big difference
Posted by: White Middle Class American Male on Aug 1, 2007 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Between accepting homosexuals and excepting transgender. Most people I associate with don't really care who a person goes to bed with. But that doesn't mean that if Mike wants to cut his dick off, put on a dress, and become Michelle, my relationship with him (I choose that pronoun purposely) would remain the same.

Are there people in the gay community that have issues with transgender?

Sorry if I refuse to embrace every niche demographic out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: El Hombre Malo
» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: freeda'all
» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: LeslieGem
» Why is this intolerant post the "Editor's Pick"? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» "Google chicks with dicks"? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Let me get this "straight"... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Thank you so much! Posted by: hagwind
» Star Gone Missing Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Star Gone Missing Posted by: freeda'all
» RE: Star Gone Missing Posted by: hagwind
» HEY, FREEDA'ALL! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: There's a big difference Posted by: hellofriends
» Individual Solutions R Us Posted by: hagwind
Naturism, gender neutral language and attitudes will help ...
Posted by: aouie01 on Aug 1, 2007 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naturism (variant of nudism), gender neutral language and attitudes will help people not be unnecessarily focused on the gender of another. It may also reduce the number of people who physically change their sex for reasons other than wanting to appeal to people (or a person) who are more attracted to a different sex.

There are some people with both male and female genitals (hermaphrodite / intersexed), while a smaller number of people actually try to unsex themselves (nullification). People who don't want to be male or female shouldn't feel so pressured to fit into a category.

Christine may be biologically and legally female, but not genetically. A day may come when one who was genetically male can become genetically female, but the person would not be "naturally female". It shouldn't matter for the most part if a person is male, female, both, somewhere in between or neither. But, to the extent it does to some people, I personally consider it dishonest to refer to a person who was born a male or female, as though they were of the opposite sex (it would be dishonest to refer to a transsexual as a male or a female). People can consider themselves to be whatever sex they want to consider themselves as. When communicating the information to another, if the other is likely to infer incorrect information, then that would be a misleading communication whether or not it is legally, or technically the correct answer. It is a good thing that I generally don't make a reference to gender and hence I can be around transsexuals without them being offended by my views on honesty and gender identities. I once found myself in a bind when someone specifically asked about the sex of a person who was transsexual. The hesitancy did imply that I could not say male or female. Since I like to presume confidentiality on such issues, I have resorted to generally answering any questions about the sex of another, with strange answers like "I believe the person is legally male" or "the person considers self as female, and presents self as female and would like to be considered female".

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Competition and genetic advantages
Posted by: aouie01 on Aug 1, 2007 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ideally, if people wanted to find out who were the best people at a a particular task, they would try to find that out regardless of gender, race, etc.

Given that the top athletes in most sports tended to be males due to genetic difference between males and females, some people found it wise to separate competitions by gender. It is clear that the intent is to separate the contenders based on the genetic makeup as male or female. Though the language may be based on the legal definition, the intent should be taken into account.

That being said, I would like to point out the wrongs of the system. What about genetic predispositions to be fat, short, tall, muscular, or other characteristics that would give huge advantages or disadvantages in some sports? Just like they have weight based categories for boxing, weightlifting, etc., shouldn't there also be different categories for running, jumping, throwing, etc.? There is some value to finding out the maximum, minimum and average / median / common capabilities of humans in many different areas, but there are better ways to determine those, than through the current world of organized sports competitions with all their unfair genetic discriminations or (more appropriately) the unfair lack of genetic discriminations. I do value improving physiques, but there are better ways to do that.

The unfair genetic discriminations or the unfair lack of genetic discriminations or (more appropriately) the unfair benefits based on genetic predispositions, is not limited to the world of sports, but is ingrained in the fabric of most societies (e.g. genetic predispositions to be able to memorize better resulting in better grades, resulting in a better job, resulting in better pay, ...).

In nature, genetic advantages does often translate into increased likelihood of being better off, but as we build societies it would make sense to prioritize rewarding efforts over rewarding luck or genes.
Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christine Daniels Is One Tough Lady
Posted by: felixcommi on Aug 1, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have to be amazed at the level of courage it takes to transition when you are a sports writer in America. It is an incredible story.

Onto those reluctant to employ the word she. When we use the words women, she, her, lady, mam, etc, we are not evoking meanings about the chromosomal framework or biological intricacies of sexual females. The concept of women often evokes social meanings tied to gender.

Gender exists in specific social, hsitorical, and cultural contexts. I would not be considered a real man 200 years ago. I would be an absolute weirdo and abberation. I have a penis but my affeminite tendences and respect and consideration for the parity of women and trans folk would be disgraceful.

Concepts of gender constantly change. Some cultures do not even have genders. Our social behaviour is not tied to our genitals. Little girls do not play with easy bake ovens because they are natually inclined to domestic servitude. Rather, domestic servitude was a necessity fo early capitalist development (see.. unpaid labour). We could easily train young children to belive any variety of acitivites are naturally suited to them.

It really is no big deal to call Christine a she. Considering how calculated and fabricated gender is, maybe we should not call anybody he or she, as to distinguish based on gender and social behaviour is intellectually lazy and perpetuates antiquated notions of biological determinism better suited for the backwards 1930's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TIps for gender-neutral or genderless communication in English.
Posted by: aouie01 on Aug 1, 2007 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gender doesn't and shouldn't matter where it ought not to matter. Try to use genderless references consistently. Over time it becomes natural with rare slip ups.

English though significantly flawed (compared to non-existent "ideal" languages) is the most widespread language at the moment. Sometimes a word that doesn't exist in the English language may need to be used for consistent gender-neutral language. When there is no need to fight the English Language don't.

Nouns instead of 'he' / 'she' / 'his' / 'her': Rather than using a plural term 'they' for 'he' or 'she', my personal preference and recommendation is to skip singular third person pronouns as much as possible. When a possible confusion could arise with pronoun references (when three or more candidates are present), it is normal to use a noun instead of the pronoun. E.g. John, Jane, and Joyko went to the park, and Joyko bought John a cruelty-free non-dairy ice cream that John and Jane relished greatly. If Jane was removed from the previous sentence, then I wouldn't change any other words (that is I wouldn't substitute a pronoun or the words former or latter for John or Joyko). Most people would presume John is a male and only a few would inquire about Joyko's gender. Over time, people get used to the avoidance of third person singular pronouns (though I still occasionally slip and use my former preferred gender-neutral pronoun "it", much to the displeasure of others and my subsequent displeasure).

Substituting 'self' for 'himself' or 'herself': It is an odd sounding but correct usage. E.g., Joyko washes self about twice a week.

Gender-neutral nouns: Spouse, parent, child, sibling. We can either fight dictionaries with policeperson, postperson, fireperson, humanpower, etc., (terms which are quite acceptable in society) or not fight dictionaries with other socially acceptable terms that are also dictionary friendly such as police officer, fire fighter, postal worker, human-power (or human power).

Descriptive reference: Parent's sibling, sibling's child, dear person (or simply Hey You), (instead aunt / uncle or nephew / niece or Sir / Madam) etc.

Commonly presumed to be genderless references: Often, I (and many others who prefer genderless references) will lean towards common presumed gender neutral terminology rather than scientific, made-up, or other uncommon terminology. E.g. actor, bartender, cow, dog, etceteras (some of these words are defined without reference to gender in several dictionaries). You could use bovine, canine, but I wouldn't recommend it. If you are picky or touchy about words like actor or waiter, then you could substitute "person whose profession is acting" or "the person whose profession is / was waiting at my table at the specified restaurant" but, I would suggest the less descriptive reference when it can be accurately interpreted as a gender neutral reference. Over time as people notice that you are using gender neutral language (for the most part), they may either understand that actor and waiter was meant in a gender neutral way or may try to pinpoint your error, which is your chance to explain it.

Many words become part of "official" English even if the number of people who use it are far fewer than the people who push for genderless references. While it is true that several different variations exist (e.g. I try to avoid pronouns altogether to stay consistent with proper "official" English even though it initially sounds odd, while some use made-up words like "hir"), there is a large portion of the English speaking population that often use genderless references (unless there is a need for a gender reference). It is high time "official" English included some options for genderless references.

Sincerely,
Aouie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accepting the transgendered
Posted by: rightiswrong on Aug 2, 2007 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immaturity by straights and even gays leads to idiotic assumptions about the trans community. People forget how fluid sexuality is in the animal kingdom, where some animals engender both sexes, reproduce with no male present, or change sex willy nilly. That humans might be fluid in their gender identification is clearly obvious. People who remain trapped in the limitations of gender role and make excuses for their fixation are a sad lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement