Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Wedding Trashers: Why Brides Are Destroying Their Dresses

By Izzy Grinspan, Salon. Posted July 5, 2007.


In a kind of rebellion against America's wedding mania, an increasing number of brides are trashing their dresses and having photographers capture these moments of rage.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Izzy Grinspan

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Weddings present a staggering array of decisions. Nobody wants to obsess over after-dinner mints, but what if you're remembered forever as "those cheap, mintless bastards"? Then there's the venue, the flowers, the invitations. Recently, one more item has crept onto this mind-bendingly long list: What is the bride going to do with her dress after the ceremony? Preserve it, give it away -- or wreck it?

The past year has seen the rise of a gleefully destructive post-wedding ritual: the "trash the dress" photo shoot, in which the bride models her gown while romping in the ocean, climbing up a fire escape, rolling in the mud, or, in at least one occasion, riding a horse. These sessions take place after the wedding. Sometimes the groom is around; sometimes he's not. The resulting photos often exude a gentle gothiness, like album covers from bands playing the second stage of the Lilith Fair circa 1997.

There's something both appealing and disturbing about the idea of a bride wrecking her expensive gown. As a culture, we're obsessed with weddings. A recent spate of books, articles and TV shows about this wedding obsession has raised our level of self-awareness; in fact, we're now a nation obsessed with wedding obsession, tsk-tsking in front of the new season of Bridezillas on the WE network and wondering why all those other women are such nut jobs. The problem is that it's a closed loop: Whether you're fretting about your own invitations or someone else's invitation-induced nervous breakdown, you're still reacting to the American cult of the bride, that gracious, white-clad perfect host.

Dress trashing seems like a potential way out of the loop, a temper tantrum aimed at the restrictive rules of bridal femininity -- albeit a photogenic one. Online, the trend coalesces around TrashtheDress.com, a Web site created in September 2006 by Louisiana photographer Mark Eric. The "godfather of trashing," according to Eric, is Las Vegas wedding photographer John Michael Cooper, whose casino-noir style and punk swagger (his company is called altf, short for "alternative fucking photography") helped shape -- and, more important, brand -- this new kind of bridal photo.

In February of 2006, on the group blog for photographers Wed Shooter, Cooper published an essay titled "Show Off! a.k.a. Trashing the Dress" about some pictures he'd taken in the Nevada desert. Stumbling upon an unearthly area of burned-up mesquite, he decided that what would really complement the post-apocalyptic landscape was a woman in a wedding dress. Four of his bridal clients turned him down, fearing they'd get dirty, so he bought a gown for $100 on eBay and got a friend to model. The resulting pictures were so unusual and haunting that brides began requesting similar shoots, and Cooper started posting them on photography forums.

Eric read the Wed Shooter piece and got inspired. That May, he pitched a trash-the-dress session to Shana Strawcutter, a free-spirited New York bride. As a gift to her, he registered TrashtheDress.com and uploaded a slide show of photos: Shana in a dingy-floored cake shop, Shana standing in the rain in Times Square, Shana jumping in a fountain. A regular on several online forums for photographers, Eric soon began seeing similar bridal photos snapped by his colleagues and realized his choice of domain names had been prescient. In September 2006, he turned the site into a gallery for these trash-the-dress pictures and published an open call for submissions. It grew slowly but steadily, reaching 100,000 people by May 2007. Then the New York Times, "Good Morning America" and "Entertainment Tonight" came calling, and within less than a month the number of readers had nearly quadrupled. Clearly, trashing the dress had tapped into a rich vein of bride rage.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: marriage, weddings, wedding dress, dress trashing

Izzy Grinspan edits the features sections of Jewcy. Her work has been published in the Believer, the Forward, and the Philadelphia Weekly.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
my god. . .
Posted by: sashi on Jul 5, 2007 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my god, we're spoiled.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: my god. . . Posted by: christastropher
» Oh, no no.... I suggest... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Oh, no no.... I suggest... Posted by: christastropher
» Don't put words in my mouth. nm Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: my god. . . Posted by: Logic's Edge
Seems like it’s another look at me moment.
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jul 5, 2007 2:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What better why to end the princess’ 25 thousand dollar day?


"There's something about taking such a strong symbol of the wedding and destroying it, that liberates you ... frees you from the residual stress from the wedding ...

It wont free you from your credit card bill.


When people say all brides are beautiful, they don't mean that ankle-length white dresses are universally flattering

Do they mean the average American women with a BMI of 45?

Why do people get married in a country with a 52% divorce rate? Let me amend that question, why do men get married in a country with a 52% divorce rate, when they are the ones who earn more money?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bingo! Posted by: hagwind
» its not animalistic. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Maybe upward mobility? Posted by: hagwind
Marriage = Private Club
Posted by: frosty86 on Jul 5, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marriage is like a whites-only country club excluding Blacks and Jews. Except in the case of marriage, gays and lesbians are excluded.

Would you join a whites-only country club?

Marriage, besides having a male supremacist history (and present) has become so much of a capitalist industry these days. The father gives away his daughter (cuz, you know, he owned her) to the groom (cuz, you know, he will soon own her). But we have hundreds of thick magazines trying to sell expensive wedding dresses, rings, flowers, stationery, honeymoon trips, etc. We see big weddings like this in movies, magazines, advertised in the newspaper...if its somebody famous, they might show it on TV. Apparently, if you're not getting married you're not mature, not special, not serious. And the pressure is even worse if you're a woman and not married. You don't get cool labels like 'silver fox.' And why in the world is white supposed to be the symbol for purity? Is Black or a darker color supposed to symbolize sin and wickedness? If so, what does say about how we view people with darker skin? Futhermore, why do we only make the bride wear the white (i.e. symbolizing purity) outifit? It's like she's not to be sexual at all until marriage. And then there's the rings...great big gaudy, shiny, blinding rings given to women to show other men she's taken, she belongs to another man....but meanwhile just plain rings given to the man...he doesn't have to show that he's taken.

What a great institutition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Marriage = Private Club Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Marriage = Private Club Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Marriage = Private Club Posted by: MatthewSavage
» Nobility Posted by: suprmark
» RE: Nobility Posted by: MatthewSavage
Socially Acceptable "Rebellion"
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Jul 5, 2007 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems like these gown-trashing photos are prime examples of the way rage and rebellion are channeled into socially acceptable bounds. These women still buy the obscenely expensive dresses (because you have to keep the economy going) that are still white (because goodness knows we can't question the symbolism of that), and they still wear the dresses on their wedding days. They're still good girls, even if they play at being rebels the next day (and play for display at that).

elizabethkateswitaj.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

because being a wife
Posted by: karyse on Jul 5, 2007 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because being a wife is culturally defined to a much greater extent than being a girlfriend, marriage can destroy a perfectly fine relationship. Unfortunately destroying the dress that symbolizes the demize of the more beneficial and powerful relationship of (girlfriend) won't restore it.

Personally, I can't believe that any woman (except, perhaps one who wants children) would submit to such a thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's it all about, Bridey?
Posted by: hagwind on Jul 5, 2007 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marriage and weddings are related for sure, but they aren't the same, and there are plenty of ways to get married without having an extravaganza wedding. Extravaganza weddings are related to, say, extravaganza bar/bat mitzvahs or debutante balls (do these still happen anywhere?). What they're celebrating is only part of the picture. At least as important is the how. Extravaganza weddings are consumption of the most conspicuous kind. I mean, really: what sane person would blow on a party the kind of money that would buy a car or establish a small business? Answer: Duh, the person who either has money to burn or wants to make it look as if he (or, possibly but less likely, she) does. And if people want to burn money, enterprising souls stand ready to help them do it. The wedding business is big where I live. People come here to throw the extravaganza wedding of their dreams. (If we're lucky, they go away afterward.) Plenty of people I know -- from landscapers to caterers, taxi drivers to musicians to hairdressers -- make a fair chunk of their annual income from it. At the ground level, it's easy to forget that weddings have anything to do with the institution of marriage.

So what is this wedding-dress trashing about? My first guess was that it's just an extension of the wedding industry: photographers are major players in the wedding biz. In my chambermaid days, I worked for an inn that was a popular venue for weddings, so I got to see quite a few of them up close but impersonal. Often it seemed as though the whole show was being staged so the participants would have photos and videos to look at later. My second guess was that these brides are rebelling against whoever funded the extravaganza, i.e., their parents, or maybe even against the conspicuous consumption aspect of it. If so, it's a no-risk form of protest compared to refusing to participate in the first place. As the article pointed out, The Dress is pretty much worthless the day after the party -- and hey, they even get some pictures to put in the album! (Do brides ever trash dresses that they made themselves?)

Dress-trashing really does seem to be all about the dress. Not about extravaganza weddings, or weddings in general, or marriage, or women's roles. In other words -- so what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a few thoughts
Posted by: dannrusso on Jul 5, 2007 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So...even IF we can accept the formality of the tradition as ok...

1. there are many women who would kill for a dress even 1/8 as nice as those dresses (have you ever seen the video of the Filene's Basement wedding gown sale?) destroying them seems to be completely classless and unthoughtful and a complete waste of money

2. thousands of dollars on a wedding and a trashed dress? "Oh look at me...even though I'm already a bride and married and it's over, i NEED to be the center of attention again" just an excuse to CONTINUE to be a bridezilla...

sigh. what a waste of many things - money, sanity, film...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

one more thought
Posted by: dannrusso on Jul 5, 2007 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how about instead of

trashmydress.com

how about

donatemydresstosomeonelessfortunate.com

?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» GetMarriedAtCityHall.com Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: one more thought Posted by: JCrowe
» Halloween wedding Posted by: BlueTigress
This is NOT a "rebellion against wedding mania" it is just another part of wedding mania
Posted by: janvdb on Jul 5, 2007 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True rebellion against this nonsense would be to refuse to waste one's good money on these elaborate dresses to begin with.

How about giving that money for health care in Africa?

But these self-obsessed nutcases aren't interested in deflating this wasteful, histrionic, theatrical, competitive over-consumption. They want yet another photo opportunity, yet another phase of the already overly complex series of little vignettes, yet another venue in which to pose, mug and present themselves to the camera, yet another obligatory scene in the drama.

B-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-oring!!!!

Look, everyone wants to be a star. Everyone wants to be the center of attention. Everyone wants all of Mommy's love all the time. Everyone wants to be a darling little princess.

But most of us learn to deal with the reality that we are not a princess at about age four or so. We learn that others exist for reasons beyond fawning on us at some point before kindergarten.

Only those suffering from immature delusions of self-aggrandizement think that spending thousands of their own money to stage some fake brouhaha, looping everyone they know into pretending to be in thrall and paying some hapless photographer to preserve their prancing selves for posterity is anything more than a childish indulgence.

Grow up, people. The whole thing is stupid. The dress is stupid and trashing it is just a little bit more of stupid.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANOTHER WAY TO MAKE A BUCK
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 5, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are people so desperately in need of attention. This is about looking like a fool on camera for all the world to see so someone else can make some money. Symbolism, maybe?
Somehow I don't see this catching on anytime soon. I hope not. Have some self respect. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yep
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 5, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Dress trashing seems like a potential way out of the loop, a temper tantrum aimed at the restrictive rules of bridal femininity -- albeit a photogenic one. "

Bullshit. Its just another little sliver of faux-rebellion. You want out of the loop???? Then stop letting culture tell you what you have to do with your life. Have a wedding you want, rather than run yourself ragged while spending obscene amounts of money for the wedding society (read: the wedding industry) tells you you should have.

You don't get out of the loop by throwing a hissy fit after you've gone through all the motions of what the loop requires.

The inability to conceptualize any real sort of rebellion from the systems that rule so many of our lives and our world is a sad fact for far too many.

These women are not empowered. They are not rebels. They are not "out of the loop". They are infantalized and are simply having a tantrum after doing exactly what they'
ve been told to do.... just as they will do the rest of their lives, sadly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yep- My sister's upcoming wedding Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Self Absorbed Idiots
Posted by: lib3288 on Jul 5, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rather than donate the dresses to women who can't afford one of their own, these assholes waste even more money to have pictures taken of themselves trashing them. What a bunch of mindless, self-absorbed idiots they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Self Absorbed Idiots Posted by: Bozly
Couldn't find any dress-trashing photos on the web site
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jul 5, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Couldn't find any dress-trashing photos on the web site... I say FORGET THE DRESS and get married in jeans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» With out god everything is permitted. -Dostoevsky Posted by: White middleclass male
» Too bad its not true.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Some rebellion!
Posted by: g on Jul 5, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see... going through all the traditional and expensive motions, including a designer gown that make most women look positively ridiculous (but hush, don't tell them, they think they look like Cinderella at the ball...); accumulating staggering, crippling credit card debt which may end up (sometimes does end up) breaking their marriage-and in the end paying some trendy photographer to trash their dress?
Congratulations to the photographer, another member of the Wedding Bandwagon, exploiting human idiocy and laughing all the way to the bank.
As for these brides, they disgust me. I can minimally understand throwing tens of thousands of dollars on a party that is supposed to celebrate a lifetime committment (well, that's the intention anyway, let's be charitable). But to throw the money in a narcissistic tantrum? Not as an "act of rebellion", as this idealistic writer would want us to believe, but because they are told it's the trendy thing to do, and so, like, they totally must have it... That is just gross. And husbands who don't get the hint deserve whatever is coming to them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a classic case
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 5, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I my wife did this...
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jul 5, 2007 7:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would immediately begin to hide my assets. I’d manage all of the bills and have secret bank accounts, ambiguous earnings, the works. Hopefully I would have gotten a duplicate ring with a zirconium to play a game of shitcharoo.

What do you think will happen when your little attention whore gets bored?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I my wife did this... Posted by: JCrowe
» Bored attention whore Posted by: BlueTigress
I am allergic to wedding dresses!
Posted by: kewpie on Jul 5, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is ridiculous to me how much people spend on the wedding. I thought it was about a marriage, not the wedding ceremony. Why start out on the wrong foot and go in debt? So many people put themselves under so much pressure to impress so many people. Then these stupid Bridezilla shows on cable show how far this country has gone. We are spoiled!

The best wedding I went to was small and intimate. Two of my siblings have had weddings like that and both are happily married!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bride rage
Posted by: christastropher on Jul 5, 2007 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So let me get this straight...You are going to engage in an activity that you don't have too, and then make it a million times more complicated than it has to be. Following this you will then get all pissy about it.

"Violent Passion Surrogate. Regularly once a month. We flood the whole system with adrenin. It's the complete physiological equivalent of fear and rage. All the tonic effects of murdering Desdemona and being murdered by Othello, without any of the inconveniences."
-BRAVE NEW WORLD
by
Aldous Huxley

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great Huxley quote! Posted by: hagwind
» RE: Great Huxley quote! Posted by: christastropher
Age of Abundance redux
Posted by: trbl9 on Jul 5, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently sat through DA Pennebaker's excellently filmed concert footage, 1968 Monterey Pop Festival. Aside from how incredibly novel the music and tripped out graphics were - and by novel I mean not lasting - what struck me most about the self involved hippie rebel performers was the Who and Hendrix smashing guitars.

If it is a sign of rage, who gives a shit about a spoiled brat's rage - except other spoiled brats? And who gives a shit about what other spoiled brats think? Baby boomers. They make spoiled bullshit antics timeless, because they still think this kind of crap is novel today - 30 long years after it ceased to be novel (with a brief nod to the other brats of proletarian struggle appropriation: Punks)

If only we could ignore it all, but the boomers keep guaranteeing they'll pay attention, because they can never stop thinking it is somehow themselves they are watching.

The vainest, greediest, saddest, most impotent and self-castrated generation ever. Can't wait til you're gone so human consideration and commonsense can emerge out of your suffocating embrace.

As one black man said - and you no doubt never heard through the fat paneling of your luxury vehicle driving through a neighborhood you would never set foot it in - because you are as white and as racist as your parents ever were:

"Move bitch, get out the way.
Get out the way, bitch.
Get out the way."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» As the dead kennedys said... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Age of Abundance redux Posted by: morticia
» There you are, morticia! Posted by: owleyes
» Yo! Posted by: morticia
» RE: Yo! Posted by: owleyes
» RE: Yo! Posted by: morticia
» RE: Age of Abundance redux Posted by: suprmark
» RE: Age of Abundance redux Posted by: morticia
» RE: Age of Abundance redux Posted by: armadillo17
Uniform rebellion- one more product to buy
Posted by: mcubed on Jul 5, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always think it's funny when an "official" form of rebellion is marketed.

This sounds like just one more product to add to the long list of "must haves", along with the "after dinner mints" described in the article.

Michele

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lyra&lili
Posted by: world traveler on Jul 5, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, guess I'm way ahead of the times. Got married in 1993 in a dress I bought for $50. It was a lovely tea-length prom dress, but it transformed into a traditional bridal gown for me, I'm short. Before the wedding, when we did pictures our photographer took a shot of us on the tandem bike we would use to ride away at the end of the day. Though the dress was not trashed, I can't imagine many brides daring to get on a greasy bike before walking down the aisle, but I figured what the hell. I'd never wear the dress again, the picture would be really cool, and its not like I spent thousands on the dress.

I think that fun gets lost in spending tons of money and people get too serious about it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An encouraging trend
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jul 5, 2007 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far as I know, this idea of burning the woman's wedding dress was first proposed by Rich Zubaty fifteen years ago in a book called "Surviving the Feminization of America". It was an excellent idea and I'm glad to see it finally being adopted, even if for other reasons. I hope the practice continues and grows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This isn't rebellion
Posted by: MatthewSavage on Jul 5, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a way to appear rebellious to those who don't know any better. What a stupid trend. If one or two people did it, it'd be cool. As a trend, not so cool. Just another marketing tool.

My wife and I actually made a profit on our wedding. The dress was $27 from the Salvation Army Thrift Store, was used twice as a dead bride costume, and everybody loved it at the wedding. Nobody knew unless we told them that it wasn't new, and was dirt cheap. Got married in a park near where my wife grew up, marriage commissioner conducted the ceremony and my father's cousin (an Anglican priest) blessed the wedding after. No big wedding cake, just lunch at a brewpub after. They baked and served the cheesecake.

It wasn't a complete rebellion against the wedding industry, it was just a ceremony that we wanted. Which is, perhaps, a rebellion against the wedding industry in that it didn't cost $25000 or more; our memories are just as good or better having only laid out $7000, including airfare to get us both home from Japan for the wedding and the honeymoon.

People need to get away from these huge weddings. If you want to get married, have the ceremony you want, not the ceremony your family expects. Rebel by not buying in at all, rather than the newly sanctioned officially sanctioned method.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Frailty, thy name is.....
Posted by: morticia on Jul 5, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...a kind of punky sticking-it-to-the-manness that allows women to feel unique without losing their bridal power."

Bridal power? Gag me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Questions
Posted by: DefeatBush on Jul 5, 2007 12:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What effect does irradiation have on (live) enzymes, vitamins and other nutrient elements in foods?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Questions Posted by: morticia
That's Trashing?
Posted by: MT512 on Jul 5, 2007 1:44 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women angrily tearing up, setting aflame, or wood-chipping their dresses? Nope, just nice shots of brides lying on the sand or wading out in the water. I'm just a dumb guy, and I figure wedding dresses are fragile and whatnot, but is this yet another aspect of our wimpification that getting a dress wet or sandy is "trashing" it? Where are the scissors, the blow-torches, the paintball battles, the rodeos?

Behold in awe as I bravely stand up against oppressive cultural mores by following them to the letter with one meaningless exception! (And take pictures so I can prove my rugged individualism and superior rebel-coefficient.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do straight people still want to get married? I thought only gay people
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jul 5, 2007 5:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wanted that & did that on Cape Cod.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eye roll
Posted by: BlueStateBitch on Jul 5, 2007 7:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody is forcing these idiots to have expensive, complicated weddings. Talk about a manufactured problem - they bring this on themselves!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can tell what God thinks of money...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jul 5, 2007 10:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...by the people He gives it to...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have a great hippy wedding instead with life long fond memories.
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Jul 6, 2007 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't imagine these weddings that most of us can't afford first of all. Recently I read in the paper that people are spending anywhere from $12,000 to $500,000 for a wedding (and we're not even talking about what really wealthy people may spend).

Ok, so honey let's start our lives together with an insane debt.

American women are especially brainwashed to think their wedding day is supposed to be impossibly perfect and out of some weird story book with unicorns and fairy godmothers and magical shoes. It's completely absurd how so many Americans have to do what they are told-- it's all done a certain way, and if not, it's not ok. You have to have the huge reception, the expensive dress that usually looks ridiculous, all the men in suits on what's usually hot summer day, crappy cake and crackers, alcohol and people getting drunk, big church ceremony no one believes in. Mom controlling the ceremonies over what daughter wants, groom going nuts-- yes dear, couple fights and almost divorces from wedding preparation stress before they start the marriage, dad controls the money and says no to the romantic music but insists on a golf tourney as part of the reception, and someone's dogs run loose and ruin everything while a drunken ex boyfriend gets up and embarasses everyone with stories no one wanted to know about how hot the bride was in bed but the abortion was really her fault.

A hippy wedding with your own words and vows, poetry, music you choose, in a nice place you love like a state park, with a few closest friends and relatives will give you life long happy memories instead with a fraction of the stress and financial cost.

I want a hippy wedding, sweetie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rebellious?
Posted by: duck-lady on Jul 6, 2007 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wouldn't it be more rebellious to refuse to participate in feeding the bridal industrial complex in the first place? Just saying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WELL SAID!
Posted by: JCrowe on Jul 7, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing else. Just---bloody well said. (-:

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Save this ritual for the divorce
Posted by: MargieW on Jul 7, 2007 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this symbolism more appropriate to a divorce than a wedding? Sure seems like you'd have to be awfully conflicted about the wedding to want to trash the dress...and have it photographed for posterity. If you're that conflicted about the man you're marrying--don't get married. If you're that conflicted about the manner in which you're getting married--don't do it that way, with somebody else's symbols. Instead of trashing the traditional dress, take that energy and find or create new symbols and traditions you can believe in. I can't think of a worse way to start married life than by turning around and trashing the wedding dress. And where did all that rage come from? Again, is that the emotion to start a marriage with? For goodness sake, if the entire traditional marriage ceremony makes you that angry, do everyone a favor and elope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheap way to trash a dress
Posted by: BlueTigress on Jul 9, 2007 9:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take it off after the festivities, hang it on its official hanger, get it home and put it in its official garment bag, make mental note about getting it preserved after you get back from the honeymoon.

That was 16 years ago for me. I should really open the bag and see what it looks like. (Note: bag has not been opened since it was closed). I have also moved since then and bag is hanging in basement near leaky water pipes.

Maybe after I get back from my mother's later this week...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]