Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Murdoch's Wall Street Journal Bid Is Greed, Pure and Simple

By Bill Moyers, Bill Moyers Journal. Posted June 30, 2007.


When it comes to money and power, Rupert Murdoch is carnivorous: all appetite and no taste. He'll eat anything in his path.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Study Claims Even the Most Sophisticated Readers Can Be Manipulated
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Bill Moyers

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If Rupert Murdoch were the Angel Gabriel, you still wouldn't want him owning the sun, the moon, and the stars. That's too much prime real estate for even the pure in heart.

But Rupert Murdoch is no saint; he is to propriety what the Marquis de Sade was to chastity. When it comes to money and power he's carnivorous: all appetite and no taste. He'll eat anything in his path. Politicians become little clay pigeons to be picked off with flattering headlines, generous air time, a book contract or the old-fashioned black jack that never misses: campaign cash. He hires lobbyists the way Imelda Marcos bought shoes, and stacks them in his cavernous closet, along with his conscience; this is the man, remember, who famously kowtowed to the Communist overlords of China, oppressors of their own people, to protect his investments there.

The ambitious can't resist his blandishments, nor his power to get or keep them in office where they can return his favors. Mae West would be green with envy at his little black book of conquests: Tory Margaret Thatcher, Labor's Tony Blair, George Bush. Even Jimmy Carter couldn't say no. Now, Bill and Hillary Clinton, who know which side of their bread is buttered, like having it slathered by their new buddy Rupert. Our media and political system has turned into a mutual protection racket.

You will not be surprised to learn that Murdoch's company paid little or no federal income tax over the past four years. His powerful portfolio positions him to claim a big stake in Yahoo and his takeover of The Wall Street Journal, now owned by the Bancroft family, which, like Adam and Eve, the parents of us all, are tempted to sell their birthright for a wormy apple.

Murdoch and The Journal's editorial page are made for each other. They've both pursued the right's corporate and political agenda of the past quarter century. Both venerate what The Journal editorials call the "animal spirits" of business. But The Journal's newsroom is another matter -- there facts are sacred and independence revered. Rupert Murdoch has told the Bancrofts he'll not meddle with the reporting. But he's accustomed to using journalism as a personal spittoon. In the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq, he turned the dogs of war loose in the newsrooms of his empire and they howled for blood. Murdoch himself said the greatest thing to come out of the war would be "$20 a barrel for oil."

Of course he wasn't the only media mogul to clamor for war. And he's not the first to use journalism to promote his own interests. His worst offense with FOX News is not even its baldly partisan agenda. Far worse is the travesty he's made of its journalism. FOX News huffs and puffs, pontificates and proclaims, but does little serious original reporting. His tabloids sell babes and breasts, gossip and celebrities. Now he's about to bring under the same thumb one of the few national newsrooms remaining in the country.

But the problem isn't just Rupert Murdoch. His pursuit of The Wall Street Journal is the latest in a cascading series of mergers, buy-outs, and other financial legerdemain that are making a shipwreck of journalism. Public-minded newspapers are being dumped by their owners for wads of cash or crippled by cost cutting while their broadcasting cousins race to the bottom. Murdoch is just the predator of the hour. The modern maestro of a financial marketplace ruled by money and moguls. Instead of checking the excesses of private and public power, these 21st century barons of the First Amendment revel in them; the public be damned.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: rupert murdoch, wall street journal

Bill Moyers is the managing editor of the weekly public affairs program "Bill Moyers Journal," which airs Friday night on PBS.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mr. Murdoch wants Dow JonesWSJ really, really, bad!!!
Posted by: eosrk on Jun 30, 2007 12:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's about to launch an Fox Biz Channel, and by owning the Dow JonesWSJ, it would make his channel proper and have teeth, instead of just being another failed prop, as in many of his other, right-winged ventures. I believe he'll up another 2 billion for it, since GE is vibing for it (personally, I rather GE to take them than NewsCorp anyday), and I pray they get it, which would give CNBC a lot of teeth and make NewsCorp out for the clowns they are!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the self-rewarding class
Posted by: Suzon on Jun 30, 2007 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rupert Murdoch is a major figure in the self-rewarding class. Australia was a good place to learn how well self-regulation works for those with no moral sense.

I've lived in the UK for the last 20 years and one of the few things that the government does well here is to limit air time for political parties.

Genuine freedom of speech does not include the right to drown out the voices of others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the self-rewarding class Posted by: henderson
Mr. Moyers
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 30, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We'll be back next week, if we haven't been bought out."

That was the last thing he said on his show last night. It is a sad indication of the current situation.

I hope he'll be back week after week. I hate to see qualified and responsible people like Moyers being pushed aside so some fat cat like murdoch can make some more money. We've seen this same thing happening at a furious pace during bush's reign. Good and caring public servants are forced out or are so demoralized and crippled that they quit, leaving us with some lying or thieving sycophant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mr. Moyers Posted by: RDVSR
» RE: Mr. Moyers Posted by: MSharp
» RE: Mr. Moyers Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Mr. Moyers Posted by: Zachria
An apt moniker for Rupert
Posted by: Democritus on Jun 30, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The British press got it so right when they referred to the Aussie Murdoch as "the dirty digger." What ghoulish connotations that phrase so aptly conjures up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Warning Labels
Posted by: Francis on Jun 30, 2007 7:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the interests of free press and free speech, the Murdochs of the world need to be tolerated (though the breadth of their holdings should be limited by law, as it once was, to allow for competition). However, because the media wields such undeniable and deliberate political influence, which affects us all, perhaps a system of labels or warnings, as in food products and pharmaceuticals is in order. Maybe a grading system by an impartial "jury" of rotating experts, if such could be found, could determine whether a news program, or a newsletter, magazine, or any form of public expression is a commercial message, infotainment, political in nature, an effort at objective journalism, or some combination of these, etc. The fact that efforts are made to obfuscate such underlying influences is reason enough to require them. Fox news would be far more palatable if before every broadcast hour, the audience was warned that what they were about to hear and see was not fair and balanced news but closer to the extreme opposite. Sooner or later the message would sink in and provide many viewers with a well needed perspective as to what is being done to them. It seems a modest and useful proposal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Warning Labels Posted by: bob t
R.V.
Posted by: RDVSR on Jun 30, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What in the world is wrong with "greed"? People who want free medicine and medical care, free housing, free food, etc. etc. are also into greed. Our whole economy...in fact the world progresses because of greed. Long may it continue to be so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» try a dictionary Posted by: monkopotamus
» RE: .V. Posted by: reason
WSJ has surprised me
Posted by: reason on Jun 30, 2007 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every once in awhile one of the WSJ writers will tell an unpolitical truth. And that is probably why Murdoch wants to buy them out. The truth burns dishonest people.

The media is the most important part of a free democracy, especially with capitalism. You have to be told the truth about your leaders and your business choices or it won't work.

Already, living here in the USA is like trying to stand on quicksand. Not only have they tried to destroy our safety nets, but even life insurance we have purchased years ago is being ate up with surcharges and fees unheard of when we bought it, making it worthless and too expensive to keep.

I am not so sure that Social Security hasn't been destroyed. They have all debt pushed down the road to where it will all come due at once, even the dubious pension fund fiasco debt comes when the majority of the boomers retire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not greed, it's sex
Posted by: eddie torres on Jun 30, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When page 3 of the Wall Street Journal starts showing naked pictures, I'll buy a copy. Wow, it's like Rupert Murdoch knows exactly what I want and will stop at nothing to get it for me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is a real issue the Democrats should run on
Posted by: sausage on Jun 30, 2007 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's really at stake is not that Rupert Murdoch is a capitalist pig, but that in the "free market" libertarian circles of both the Democratic and Republican parties, he's seem as the acme of capitalist success and the paragon of the "free market" economy. There's little incentive to rein him in.

If the Democratic Party were true to its Jefferson-Jackson-FDR New Deal roots it would run on strengthening regulations for large corporate businesses. At the same time the Democrats would promise to examine and eliminate regulations and laws now on the books which hamstring small, family owned businesses.

But, alas, this won't happen, for frontrunner and presidential nominee apparent Hillary Clinton has already eaten Rupert's poisoned apple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only good thing
Posted by: paschn on Jun 30, 2007 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From this is that when the repulsive swine chokes down his last breath, his minions will be right there to choose another rapacious dog to follow. This culture of sheep not only has beaucup mindless drones but an abundance of evil doers to lead 'em

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well done, Rupert!
Posted by: turbo_sage on Jun 30, 2007 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's great. As an Australian, it's payback for all the crap you've exported to this country: McDonald's, KFC, Jerry Springer, TV evangelists, Scientology, Sylvester Stallone movies and stupid reality TV shows. Bravo rupert!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

matters “way beyond our ability to understand,”
Posted by: shangrilalad on Jun 30, 2007 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of us know how our government operates, time and the Republican Party has stripped us of most of our illusions about “National Interest, National Defense, Law & Order, Balance of Powers,” all that political stuff you hear mentioned all the time. Most of us now realize that our input on matters “way beyond our ability to understand,” are decided by people we’ve seldom heard of. These people are not “elected leaders,” in most cases they are rich and powerful opportunists intent on imposing their will on all the rest of us.

Rupert Murdoch for instance, is one of the most powerful “leaders“ in the world. Megalomania does not do justice to guys like Murdoch. Rupert Murdoch has the power to determine what news tens of millions of American’s hear. His version of the news. That’s the power to manipulate and intimidate “elected leaders” and influence the “National Agenda.”

Money and power selects our “leaders,” not media brainwashed voters.

There are a couple thousand “Murdochs,” in America, and they determine the “National Agenda, National Interest, National Defense, Law & Order, Balance of Powers,” all that political stuff you hear mentioned all the time.

Americans know how to get rid of “elected leaders” who rat us out, but how do we get rid of the real leaders, who OWN the “elected leaders,” who rat us out.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An extremist zionist rag being bought by an extremist zionist.
Posted by: justaguy on Jun 30, 2007 8:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm, can't get excited. Murdoch is scum, but it's a scummy paper anyway.

I remember being in NYC at the outbreak of the second intifada, after just having been in the middle east. The reporting and the editorial pages were chilling to say the least in their bloodlust against nonJews in Palestine and their total lack of any sort of objectivity. Arabs were treated as subhumans who should be worshipping at the feet of the zionists of the IDF.

I cancelled the interview that I was there for, got an early flight out and have never been back to America. I realised that there was a deep evil in the power structure.

On 9/11 when the images of choreographed dancing Palestinians being beamed around the world just hours afterward, I felt that same chilled nausea and feared for Palestine's very existence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enlarging the Murdoch Legacy
Posted by: truman2 on Jun 30, 2007 9:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rupert Murdoch and his Chinese Mainland-born trophy [second and considerbly younger] wife are building a courtyard-style house perhaps one block from the Forbidden City in Beijing. From there, his wife will one day reign as the ultimate Chinese capitalist when she inherits a major share of her husband's estate at his passing. That fortune, built on a misuse of power and uncontrolled greed, and sustained by an increasingly passive, uniformed democratic society and American politicians that permit men like Murdoch to thrive and destroy competition, will be used to eventually help China achieve its ultimate goal: the demise of the United States. In retrospect, Murdoch's "purchase" of his U.S. citizenship was an act of treason by a government that for decades has damned its citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bill Moyers
Posted by: truman2 on Jun 30, 2007 10:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Moyers is a national treasure to be cherished and sustained by an increasing number of PBS viewers and blog readers. In a new administration, he should be the first person to receive a National Medal of Honor. Moyers represents hope and truth in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let he who has wisdom
Posted by: fixitt on Jul 1, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
count the number of the beast, the number of a man;

In pythagoric numerological numbering, A=1 to I=9; J=1 to R=9; S=1 to Z=8...

FOX = 666

Need I say more?

Rev. Don

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A casualty in the revolution
Posted by: lonpine on Jul 3, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They used to say that freedom of the press belongs to those who own the press.

Yes, the WSJ was always a great paper, whose editorial staff clearly didn't read it.

And yes, it's dying shame Murdoch will own it; destroy it. Maybe some new news organization will emerge. But with the internet, youtube, who knows exactly where the press will go. Murdoch owns a part of a paradigm that's shifting after all. And Murdoch's gone green too. Too bad for the good ol' press.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement