Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Matt Taibbi Writes Back!

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted June 26, 2007.


The author responds to reader questions, sharing his views on the 2008 election and that while he's often attacked for being a Hunter Thompson wannabe, the writer he's actually trying to rip off is H.L. Mencken.
Advertisement

Editor's note: Matt Taibbi responds to two dozen reader questions. Questions were edited for length and/or clarity by Rolling Stone.

_________________

What made you want to become a political reporter? As a child, did you ever imagine yourself in the position that you are in today?

- Name Withheld

As a child I wanted to be a zoologist. Then from about the age of 14 on I wanted to be a novelist. I'm a political reporter because my fiction sucks. You should read it. I mean, it's not just bad, it's like … screamingly bad. Talents such as us end up in political journalism. _______________________________________________

Why are some Republicans (and many media types) so hot and bothered about the prospect of Fred Thompson running for president? I can't recall one piece of notable legislation or accomplishment as senator. (They often point to his role as Howard Baker's counsel during Watergate, but to me that's less of an accomplishment and more a result of being Howard Baker's bag man in Tennessee.)

- Name Withheld

They're hot and bothered about him because he can win. The fact that he has no accomplishments makes him uniquely qualified for the modern presidency. The fact that he has no accomplishments and has been on Law and Order makes him well nigh a freaking political superstar. No record + media skillz + name recognition = electoral success. Personally I always get him confused with Joe Don Baker.

_______________________________________________

I'm pretty left leaning in most of my views, but nobody in the Democratic party really does it for me. Everything I see and read about Chuck Hagel makes me like him. What do you know/think of him?

Best,

Will in Colorado

Chuck Hagel is an interesting guy I guess. I talked to him once when, if I remember correctly, he was considering co-sponsoring Charlie Rangel's draft bill in the Senate. The thing about the current state of the Republican party is that Bush's implosion has opened the door for a resurgence of "real" Republicanism, i.e. small-government/isolationist Republicanism. Bush was really not much of a Republican at all -- more like a retarded Christian AA version of Woodrow Wilson. He spent like crazy and he got America involved in these crazy "let's export the wonderfulness of us" adventures. Because America these days has a cultural memory of about four seconds no one remembers that this is not the way Republicans used to act, but once Bush finally blew up, the door opened for some canny people in the party to remind everyone of that fact. Hagel looks like the first guy to try that tack.

_______________________________________________

1) Not that there's anything sinister with happening to agree with one party's values more, but do you think that your National Affairs coverage is perhaps a little bit too partisan?

2) What is your favorite YouTube campaign stunt? What is your least?

3) Will the blog or online media make print effectively irrelevant for political updates?

4) If you could ask George W. Bush one question and be actually guaranteed an honest answer, what would you ask him?

- Tyler Bass

1) Re partisanship: if you think my coverage of the Bush administration is unkind, wait until Hillary Clinton becomes president.

2) I don't watch You Tube much, but I do watch X Tube regularly. I keep hoping to catch someone like Lindsey Graham on there.

3) I don't think blogs will replace print media completely. As long as men keep shitting on Sunday mornings, the print newspaper will thrive.

4) As for Bush, the question I always wanted to ask him was if he thought Muslims automatically went to hell after death. I think that would be an interesting question because there's no way for him to answer it without pissing off one or the other group of lunatics. _______________________________________________

Of all of the viable candidates for the Democratic and Republican nominations, who will win on each side? Who will you support once this choice is made?

- Name Withheld

It's going to be Thompson against Hillary or Edwards and I'm going to cast a write-in vote for Joseph Stalin if it comes to that. _______________________________________________

In person, is Hillary Clinton as cold and distant as she seems on television, in magazines, and in books?

- Name Withheld

I've only seen Hillary in person once and I was struck by how big her head is compared to the rest of her body. She looks like a bobblehead. _______________________________________________

For all American politicians in general, how much of their religious faith is real, and how much is for the votes?

- Name Withheld

I think Bush's is real. Gary Bauer's is real, so is Santorum's. The rest are all completely full of shit. I remember Kerry trying to tell reporters on the plane once that he likes to pray quietly to himself at night or something like that. It was so sad. I was afraid the stewardesses were going to burst out laughing.

_______________________________________________

Hi Matt, first of all I'd like to say how much I enjoy reading your column. Here's my question: I live in the UK, and I always hear complaints made about the 'liberal american media'. However, there is virtually nothing in American news that even approaches what I would define as 'liberal'. Am I just missing what is in front my nose, or is it a figment of the right's paranoid imagination?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: matt taibbi

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Alternet needs more Matt Taibbis
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 26, 2007 2:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Alternet is still a notch above most progressive sites that I've seen, I think they could use more edge, humor, and thinking outside the box. A lot of the articles are starting to look the same.

Even this silly Q&A is more interesting than 95% of what I've seen here lately.

If anybody knows about progressive web sites with more Taibbi-style articles, I'd appreciate the links.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Alternet needs more Matt Taibbis Posted by: lawstudent08
You must be jokng
Posted by: dainin on Jun 26, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This guy is the weakest poser in the history of "alternative media".

By the way, not only was H. L. Mencken not a smirking chimp, he would undoubtedly choke on this "apex of moronia".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taibbi will always have a job.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 26, 2007 6:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another "journalist" towing the party line for the bush administrations 9/11 conspiracy theory that it was not complicit. Since you've drank the bush administration's kool-aid, you have ensured some right winger will always be ready to hire you as long as you forget about the poor, quit writing excellent eulogies like you did for Yeltsin, and denounce drug use.

Here's the latest I've seen on defunking,

Pandora's Black Box

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh yeah
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 26, 2007 6:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mencken would have been all over the bush administration's 9/11 bullshit.

Sir, you are no H.L. Mencken.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

28 Redacted Pages on 9/11 Isn't Just Hilarioous! It's Shilltastic! (TM)
Posted by: johndoraemi on Jun 26, 2007 9:57 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah Taibbi, you're so brilliant. Twenty eight pages that they won't release to the public, including evidence of "foreign governments" assisting alleged 9/11 hijackers (Bob Graham), is just waiting for some good penis joke angle to make it sing.

You're worse than a shill. You're an imbecile spreading stupidity as far and wide as you possibly can.

70 Disturbing Facts About 9/11

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton. . . the Bobblehead Doll
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Jun 27, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding her big head, I always remember Merv Griffin claiming soap-opera actress Susan Lucci's outsized head helped make her a star.

TV likes big features, especially in people on the short side. But couple Clinton's bobblehead with her bugging-out eyes, as Jan Frel pointed out a couple of months ago, and you wonder if the public will vote for her.

(Please hold your applause for my trenchant political commentary.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clinton. . . the Bobblehead Doll Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Sound of one hand clapping... Posted by: eddie torres
» Fox Big Heads Posted by: bob t
If Bush did 9/11 what are you doing sitting in front of a monitor?
Posted by: klarkash on Jun 27, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you believe that Bush did 9/11, your crime is almost as bad- sitting in a chair typing to strangers on the teen chat line (oops, Internet) instead of demonstrating, agitating, and plotting to take Cheney out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taibbi interview with Sy Hersh
Posted by: eddie torres on Jun 27, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Asked about his best interviews, Taibbi says: "I'd say Sy Hersh was among my most interesting."

If you missed it in April, it's here.

Best quotes from Hersh:

How to fix the US press - "You'd have to fire or execute ninety percent of the editors and executives."

What's wrong with the Bush White House - "There's no real mechanism in the administration for looking at the downside of things." and "All of the institutions we thought would protect us -- particularly the press, but also the military, the bureaucracy, the Congress -- they have failed."

The lessons learned in Vietnam - "I would argue that some key operators, the Cheney types, they learned a great deal about how to run things and how to hide stuff over those years."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 100% Agreed Posted by: bob t
Fan
Posted by: clainehart on Jun 27, 2007 9:03 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a huge Taibbi fan and have been since 1998, where I discovered his writing in Moscow. I admit I haven't kept up with his former publications since he left them.

I submitted a question, too, to Rolling Stone, that was not all that incendiary, so I am curious as to why it got disregarded: I still want to know why Taibbi left Russia, suddenly and inexplicably. I believe he has never really been honest about that. I believe it was

1) Because he had a price on his head (totally plausible, considering what he wrote in Russia);
2) Because of his drug problem;
3) Because his girlfriend wanted to live stateside; or
4) all of the above or some combination thereof.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Curious reaction to Kerry quietly praying....
Posted by: Bozly on Jun 28, 2007 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FInd it facinating really, that the take was Kerry was presumed to be FAKING religion/prayer when he said he QUIETLY prayed...MOST OF US DO SO, most of US /ORDINARIES do NOT go to street corners or etc to SHOUT our prayers and prefer to keep our "religious" encounters far more private and yet hold them dear and even sacred. WHAT is with snideness and IGNORANCE shown in making such observation ...no basis in REALITY OF MOST but can be USED for ABUSE and often such derision IS. (witness the present vulgarities spewed by Coulter to the Edwards family/campain/etc...Think the Edwards ARE correct, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH, the slime artists need to be called out on the garbage and innuendoed spewings that via media outlets get falsely credited as being a CORRECT OBSERVATION when in REALITY is NOT. --another example was that infamous Dean Scream, taken OUT of context and pummeled into public mindsets as IF that actually personafied Dean and his tendency to be a loose cannon/wacko. ENOUGH OF THE FLIM/FLAM/SHIM/SHAM/scammings of this sort of ilkers!!! Entitled to opinons, but outrageous to claim represents factuals or ACTUAL REALITY !!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MATT TAIBBI IS A JOURNALIST 'CUZ HIS DAD.......
Posted by: pssdoffwomn on Jun 28, 2007 9:56 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
........is a journalist and probably helped him get his start,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think you may be on to something Posted by: rancespergl
Bozly, you said it...
Posted by: bob t on Jul 1, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...perfectly. Though I tend to be a Matt Taibbi fan to some extent his deriding of Kerry's quietly praying comment was out of line. As you pointed out most of us pray that way, quietly. You made a great and insightful observation.

For most of us religion is a private and personal practice and done quietly. In fact I highly resent those who so loudly and egregiously proudly exclaim their religious values.

And via the Republican party, of Reagan, daddy Bush and now most especially with baby Bush, try to force their religion and religious values down the throats of the 241 million of us that did not vote for Bush and want nothing to do with him, or his family, or their mindset, or the Republican party(the party of death for profit) and those two big religions that are enablers of the Republican/southern mindset, Catholicism, my religion and evangelical fundamentalism.

Even though I am a catholic I am not a right wing fundamentalist Republican supporting catholic. The Republican party and their enablers are the greatest threat to all human life in America and on this planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taibbi Exposes Himself (Ew!)
Posted by: gretavo on Jul 2, 2007 9:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After cavalierly promising (months ago) that after his snide and substanceless hit piece against the 9/11 truth movement he was going to write another column specifically addressing the physics involved [i.e. molten steel, pulverized concrete, speed of "collapse", scores of witnesses to explosions in the twin towers and building 7 (which collapsed with no explanation given after 6 years)] but predictably never did.

Now he proposes instead to make public his email correspondence with the 20 something yearl old makers of the 9/11 documentary film, as if these kids were somehow representative of the movement that includes groups of Architects, Engineers, Pilots, Veterans and Scholars all speaking out for a new examination of the mountains of evidence that we have been lied to (surprise) by the Bush administration and the corporate media about what actually happened on 9/11.

Nice dodge, Matt! You seem to think that the "Loose Change boys" still have credibility after so many of their shenanigans have shown them to be at best a kind of controlled opposition straw man that people like you can focus on so as to avoid having to take on a serious and honest researcher and 9/11 truth advocate like Prof. David Griffin, whose new book Debunking 9/11 Debunking is far outselling every book arguing in favor of the official version of events.

Of course you and others will cry "conspiracy!" and suggest that all of us who make these points are just part of a plot to discredit the left, or discredit Bush, or discredit Israel, etc. Maybe, just maybe, YOU are wrong and all of us are just seriously ticked off and well-informed citizens trying to salvage what is left of our democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Taibbi Exposes Himself (Ew!) Posted by: danjkelly2