Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

SiCKO Is Michael Moore's Best and Most Powerful Documentary

By David Corn, TheNation.com. Posted June 23, 2007.


Michael Moore's new movie is a dead-on dissection of America's sick healthcare system. Funny, sad and moving, it's the best of his films.
Advertisement

In 1971, Edgar Kaiser, the son of the founder of Kaiser Permanente, one of the first big HMOs, went to see John Ehrlichman, a top aide to President Nixon, to lobby the Nixon White House to pass legislation that would expand the market for health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Ehrlichman reported this conversation to Nixon on February 17, 1971. The discussion, which was taped, went like this:

Ehrlichman: I had Edgar Kaiser come in...talk to me about this and I went into it in some depth. All the incentives are toward less medical care, because the less care they give them, the more money they make.

President Nixon: Fine.

The next day, Nixon publicly announced he would be pushing legislation that would provide Americans "the finest health care in the world."

When tapes of the Nixon-Ehrlichman conversation and Nixon's subsequent public statement are played halfway through Michael Moore's new movie SiCKO, it is one of the film's more revealing moments. By this point in the film, Moore has already demonstrated that health insurance companies and HMOs are parasitic villains that routinely deny necessary medical care to make more bucks -- even when their money-grubbing leads to the death of patients. Looking for the original sin that led to the present mess, Moore zeroes in on this Nixonian moment, which encapsulates the film's premise that the United States health care system is defined by a fundamental conflict: profit versus care, and -- no surprise -- profit beats care.

Moore makes this point magnificently in SiCKO, which is the best film in the Moore canon. I say this as one who had a mixed reaction to Fahrenheit 9/11. (See here.) This time around, Moore has crafted a tour de force that his enemies will have a tough time blasting (though they will still try). It's not as tendentious as his earlier works. It posits no conspiracy theories. The film skillfully blends straight comedy, black humor, tragedy, and advocacy. You laugh, you cry -- literally. And you get mad.

The film stitches together a string of health care horror stories. Moore opens the movie by looking at two cases involving Americans who don't have health insurance. One fellow who sliced off the tips of two fingers is told at the hospital that he can attach the ring finger for $12,000 and the middle finger for $60,000. He can't afford both. Ever the romantic, Moore reports, this man opts to save his ring finger.

But SiCKO is not about the uninsured. It's about those who have insurance and who have been screwed. Moore began this project by advertising on the Web for tales of health care woe. Within a week, he had received 25,000 emails. That's plenty of raw material. One enterprising father of a child who was going deaf and whose insurance company would only pay for one ear implant wrote his insurance firm and asked if its CEOs would like to appear in Moore's film. The company -- whaddayaknow -- quickly authorized payment for the other implant.

From this flood of complaints, Moore drew compelling and heartbreaking stories. A woman is denied payment for a major procedure because she neglected to mention on her insurance application that she once had a yeast infection (which was, of course, unrelated to the procedure she needed). A mother loses her 18-month-old daughter because a hospital won't treat her without authorization from her insurance company and her insurer insists she takes the child (during an emergency situation) to an in-network hospital. A woman who was in a car crash is denied payment for an ambulance trip because she did not receive pre-approval for that cost. A man is denied a bone-marrow transplant that could save his life and dies.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: health care, sicko, michael moore

David Corn is the Washington editor of The Nation and author of The Lies of George W. Bush and is the co-author of Hubris: The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War. He writes a blog at davidcorn.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
no reform
Posted by: Alec Freeman on Jun 23, 2007 2:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Moore's commendable film will have little or no impact on the obscene American healthcare system. Big business and lobbyists are simply too powerful. Electing politicians who would genuinely stop these forces is the only solution. Sadly, I have very little faith in the American populace, a significant number of which don't even vote at all. Apparently, to many Americans, Paris Hilton's jail term, Anna Nicole Smith's baby, and who's gay are more important issues than the failure of the US healthcare system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no reform Posted by: CatDad
» RE: no reform Posted by: marid
» We voted last time- Posted by: WitchyNy
» the real problem is the divisive Identity Politics of the fakeLeft Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» RE: Fake-Left Sham Posted by: CatDad
» RE: no reform Posted by: AndreaN
Michael Moore
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jun 23, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really hate to sound like a broken record, but Michael Moore is a national treasure. Two hundred years from now, I believe, scholars will be studying his films and writings much in the same way that Thomas Paine is studied today. No one in American society today has had as much slander hurled at him that Michael Moore. No one is less deserving of it. Now that the film is officially out there, the half-witted, right wing smear machine is going to have a dandy summer as they go into overdrive spreading lies about the man and his message. Fine. You can tell a lot about a person by his enemies.

National treasue...Civic hero...Pain in the neck...We're lucky to have him on our side.

Peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Right on, Tom! Posted by: HughScott
» RE: Right on, Tom! Ditto!!!! Posted by: drricklippin
» Can Moore Rant??? - I think not! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Jane Fonda.... Posted by: CatDad
» Liberals for Torture !!!!! Posted by: Conservasaurus
David vs. Goliath
Posted by: Democritus on Jun 23, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ever since "Roger and Me," Michael Moore has gone after the vested interests, telling it the way it is on behalf of those who suffer for the profit of the elites. Whether it's the auto industry, the gun lobby, the war-mongerers, or Big Pharma, Moore has always shined his light on the methods that big business uses to enhance its profits by ripping off the rest of us. Moore is the agent of populism, a David who aims his slingshot at the Goliath of big business. The historical David had to kill only one Goliath. Moore has to keep reloading his sling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: David vs. Goliath Posted by: Lincoln fan
Top Sicko
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jun 23, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Moore zeroes in on this Nixonian moment, which encapsulates the film's premise that the United States health care system is defined by a fundamental conflict: profit versus care, and -- no surprise -- profit beats care." ---- does any rational person for one second think that because healthcare is "universal" that profit goals go out the window.. a socialist country we are not..

While I am VERY anti insurance considering the obsecene premiums I pay for the little service I get, for Moore to make a left /right issue out of this important topic, just to line his own pockets truly puts him on the top of the SICKO list.

For years HMO's, while making alot of money did provide good benefits, cheaper than other plans.. I installed a few of them in companies I worked for and they were great packages..until for some reason in the last 10 years they decided to screw everyone, the docs in the plan, the patients..all except their CEO's.. premiums doubles and benefits reduced..and doc's opted out.. quite a few "good" doc's don't take any insurance at all!!!

No one needs Moore to explain this.. now..if he donate ALL the profits to 9-11 first responders medical care.. mm.. never happened - unless he could make a movie out of it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Those Rich Dems Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Top Sicko Posted by: Jo1028
Fingers crossed for a MM smash hit and resulting change in national attitude.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 23, 2007 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the 2004 election season, I attended a MoveOn.org gathering that featured live interactive conversation with Michael Moore over the Internet.

I will never forget what he said about Democrat and GOP campaigners. “We party until four a.m.,” quipped Mike, “then go to bed. That’s when Republicans get up and go to work.”

His point was, of course, Republicans, particularly GOP rightwingers, are determined to preserve the status quo and will fight like hell to that end. Given their way, medical care will remain expensive and out of reach for many Americans. It’s all about greed, money and lust for power.

Absent from the equation is concern for less fortunate citizens, especially the unemployed and working poor. Hopefully, “Sicko” will open enough hearts to make possible a paradigm shift back to center, sending politicians to Washington who are genuinely committed to an effective universal health care system in the United States. Otherwise, people that matter most to me -- my children and their offspring -- will see worse times ahead, not better ones.

Keeping my fingers crossed for a Michael Moore blockbuster success.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of the nonprofit investigative website, King-George.biz, which presents hardcopy proof of White House corruption plus 60 cartoons, photos and other Bushwhacking illustrations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wouldn't it be nice
Posted by: katinmn on Jun 23, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if all the people (individuals, physicians, researchers, nurses, pharmacists) who demand health care reform and all those who want to end the war NOW would converge on the capital to truly Take Back America?(reg.trademark) Let's add in those who can't sleep at night because of global warming, the national debt, torture and loss of habeas corpus, our underfunded public education system, and immigration non-policies.

We cannot wait around for the next four cycles of elections to pad the Congress and WH with enough "progressives" to make health care accessible and take our government and media away from corporations.

ComeOn MoveOn, UFP&J, Physicians for Universal Health Care, Kucinich, Jesse Jackson, Media Matters, The Nation and the thousands of other groups, leaders and independent media: you have our ears and our money. Let's stop whining to each other and addressing our own pet projects with petitions and vigils. Time to practice some real solidarity. Organize!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grass Is Greener Up Here - Just Watch For Turds
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Jun 23, 2007 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone seeking a progressive change to healthcare in the US should be careful when making comparisons to our Canadian system.

The majority of us believe in it as part of our 'National Identity' but it has been under attack for a long time. It is now characterized by long wait times for surgeries, emergency room wait times are measured in glacial ages, and there is an intense lack of Family Doctors. Usually those without doctors have to go to after-hours clinics and wait and, in our town, that just got longer because they closed down one of the clinics.

The critics of the system point to these facts as proof that the public system isn't sustainable. It's bull, straight up. I would rather wait than face an American style healthcare nightmare. Our system has been systematically under-funded by governments pushing a neo-liberal economic policy agenda. It's the oldest trick in the book - pick your public service, underfund it, criticize the inevitable problems as proof of its inherent flaws.

Under NAFTA it is going to be much easier for private interests to attack the public system. Here's a bit of history: When free Medicare was introduced to Canada, the doctors were up in arms, there were strikes etc. It didn't come easy. Now it is under attack again, and has been for some time.

I saw an interesting thing in one of our major papers the other day. Hillary Clinton was alleging that the US Health system was losing doctors to Canada because our public system is more efficient and better able compensate.

Perhaps she could explain why we have such a lack of doctors and the ones we do have are always at risk of leaving? Our own 'experts' have been telling us for years about the 'brain drain' to the US system that is better able to compensate. We have scores of immigrants from all over Asia that drive cabs because their degrees aren't recognized here.

Anyway, did I have a point? Oh yes. Our American cousins aren't the only ones who face healthcare woes, but yours are much worse and I wish you the very best of luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's some sad commentary. Posted by: WhatNow?
» Canary in the Coal Mine Posted by: BenjamminH
Like a leaky faucet
Posted by: willymack on Jun 23, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "anything for money" gang won't go away merely because the rug has been pulled out from underneath them, and Universal Health Care has been instituted. Canada is an excellent example. Once a leaky faucet has been repaired, the waste of water is halted until such time as the faucet wears out and the dripping begins anew. Just as the water pressure is constant, and only a well functioning valve will hold it back, the neocrooks will NEVER accept anything they can subvert and destroy when obscene profits are in sight. This is as much a mental health issue as anything else. Does anyone believe the greedy bastards are NORMAL?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Capitalism is the problem- Posted by: WitchyNy
Did you all see on the PETA site the attack on Michael Moore?
Posted by: WitchyNy on Jun 23, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was rude and mean. One of the few organizations I still had faith in. I can hardly believe it. What the hell is going on here? I think people are afraid of this man's power.

And what is his power? Speaking the plain truth, a TRUE love of his country and his people, instead of blind patriotism, a talent for making funny and profound MOVIES- that unique art form that started in America, and a hard working class wit and intelligence.

He is a true leader-such a rare thing now-and that seems to scare the hell out of some people. Or perhaps they are just jealous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» zooeyhall Posted by: WitchyNy
» cows! Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: cows! Posted by: WitchyNy
» PETA is FAKE Leftist Posted by: emmanuel_goldstein_fights_fake_lefties
» Shey- Posted by: WitchyNy
» Who cares what PETA thinks? Posted by: bulbman
Industry Versus Industry Could End Private Health Insurance
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 23, 2007 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Private health insurance, HMO's etc., are the nemesis preventing reform of health care in America right now. With deep pockets and legions of lobbyists, they have many a politician under wraps. But, what may help is that many big corporations now feel under siege from health care costs. Recently, Toyota decided to locate a new auto assembly complex in the already heavily industrialized area of the Hamilton-Toronto corridor in Canada, instead of placing it in the USA. The health care costs were the factor. When you take current health insurance premiums along with any projected retirement benefits, the American nightmare of private insurance is very readily apparent. Especially, when the USA, which already has Medicare that administratively costs 2-3% is compared with the private insurance nightmare of easily 15-20% plus of administrative costs (ie, for the CEO's, stockholders, etc.). So, it may ultimately be that as America continues to loose ground due to rising health costs, loosing industries might bring some pressure to bear on the Congress. Of course, it will not be the individual citizenry that brings about a change, despite Moore's polemic, they stopped mattering in money controlled America long time ago, but the corporate world vs the corporate world (insurance), might bring about change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It goes way beyond this- Posted by: WitchyNy
Teachpeace
Posted by: teachpeace on Jun 23, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
M. Moore For Sec. of Health and Human Services.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Teachpeace Posted by: WitchyNy
SICKO WILL TRANSFORM THE NATION
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 23, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks David Corn and AlterNet-

I am not a movie critic is but I believe Moore will win another Oscar in 2008. This movie is Moore's best yet whose subject addresses the domestic issue that will elect our next US president. Moore's movie will help lock that political reality in.

As a physician-activist on health care reform I recognize the power of an excellent movie on capturing the passions of the many who are disaffected with our severely broken US health care system.

Moore's SICKO will do for health care reform what Al Gore's documentary "An Inconvenient Truth" did for global warming although Gore's movie has more global relevance and global appeal.

All US citizens should go see SICKO this summer. Going to this movie will not only be good for their personal health, it will be good for the health of our nation.

My own piece on SICKO which I published Thursday can be found on my blog we call Critical Condition

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

symptoms of a deeper illness
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jun 23, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God bless Mike Moore! Once again, as with "Roger and Me", he tells the stories that need to be told.

However, I am pessimistic about any real reform. The lack of national health care in this country is just a symptom of a much deeper sickness in American social and political culture. "Let's have national health care!" is a laudable goal, but other, even larger, problems must be faced before any real health care reform occurs. And the two most important are the corruption of the political process by campaign contributions from corporations, and the corporate control of the media.

But above even this is the general ruthless ecomomic darwinism and "greed is good" culture in the U.S. As long as the measure of success in our country is "if it makes money, you don't make apologies" nothing substantial will happen. And the health industry has been VERY good at making money for certain groups. You think they aren't going to give this up without a fight?

This culture of greed is shot-through our whole society. It is reinforced constantly by the media. The religious crap and the churches that are so ubiquitous have also done their part to reinforce this.

In the end, if push comes to shove, I think they will come up with some stupid plan requiring people to buy health insurance--much like the way it is now with car insurance. And alot of good that will do for people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reliance is for the Cowardly
Posted by: nefarious_snark on Jun 23, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Every single Michael Moore film is labled "his best and most powerful movie yet." All of them. Extremes like best and most are near always hyperboles.
2. While people view these films, and are supposedly moved by them, how many audience members really get up at the end of the movie with hearts full of confidence and go do something about it? I believe Moore himself asked this very question in one of the extras on the "Bowling for Columbine" DVD. While I admire Michael Moore, and acknowledge that he does something about the problems: he gets the word out, many of the audience bitch about things, but never do a damn thing to solve it. People need to stop thinking that they are so powerless, because that is utter self deception. No matter how much money a firm has, there are more of us, so we have more power. We could beat them up if we wanted, so we rule. That's Democracy.
P.S. Michael Moore kicks ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moore for hire
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Jun 23, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore's new movie just draws attention away from the real people orchestrating this exploitation of humanity.

Yes the US government is for sale, but the real question is who is buying them? Pharmaceutical companies making 500,000% profits on some drugs, phony scientists with paid for science. What about the currupt charities running research which will never cure a disease?

As always, we are treating the symptom, not the root cause.

Also, Canada's healthcare system bites. He claims its wonderful, but we still use the same useless drugs that don't cure anything. Sure everyone gets free care, but they can't do a damn thing for you beyond fire some drugs at you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» US Healthcare better than Canada's Posted by: Lincoln fan
Bright, shining spotlight
Posted by: Jeanne on Jun 23, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore is focusing attention on what I hope will be a huge issue in 2008 -- right behind ending the Bush' War in Iraq.

Single payer is the only system that makes sense. Why is there an industry that profiteers off of the health, or lack thereof, of the populace? Profit motive is motive to deny care. Profit motive is motive to minimize care. Profit motive is motive to discourage active, preventive care. Why is there always a middle-man between patient and provider? A middle-man who has veto power over what constitutes proper and prudent medical care. A middle-man who in many cases is not even medically trained. And why is this middle-man so much more aggressive when the patient is poor and not abundantly insured? The wealthiest among us have no concern; what insurance won’t cover, they pay from chump change. The rest of us just pray that we don't get seriously sick. And if we do, that it'll kill us quickly before we leave our families destitute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's one distinct view on universal health care
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Jun 24, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Overheard: "just means more n------s makin' babies, and I'm not gonna pay for it!"

There we have the bigot argument.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A special response to Dr. Rick Lippin’s excellent comment above titled, “SICKO WILL TRANSFORM…”
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 24, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s aways refreshing to see an AlterNet comment with the author’s REAL name. But what makes Dr. Lippin’s contribution special to me is his medical background.

Dr. Lippin is a recognized leader in the specialty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM), which he practiced for over 25 years. In recognition for his achievements in his field, he was the 1997 recipient of the prestigious Health Achievement in Occupational Medicine Award given annually by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM).

Hopefully more doctors will post comments on AlterNet with real names -- especially when the subject is about our national health care crisis.

One such physician who has been addressing America’s medical problems through the Internet -- in this case, brain trauma suffered by Iraq War vets -- is Dr. Robert Meaders, in Montgomery, Texas.

Dr. “Bob” started the charitable organization, Operation-Helmet, which I began promoting in early 2006 on my nonprofit investigative website King-George.biz.

Here’s how King-George.biz presents the public service information:

“America's Disgrace”

Despite continuing sectarian violence in Afghanistan and Iraq that began after the 2003 invasion, many U.S. troops stationed there are not adequately protected from brain damage caused by RPGs and roadside bombs.

The head trauma, which is often permanent, can be reduced with new high-tech helmet liner pads produced by Oregon Aero Inc.

However, some GIs in combat haven't received the life-saving cushions they requested. Other troops don't even know the improved pad system exists, despite publicity generated by the famous singer rock star, Cher.

Operation Helmet, an Internet charity organization, fills the need with FREE Oregon Aero upgrade kits. Qualified military personnel can order the no-cost liner pads online at Operation-Helmet.org.

As of 06-24-07, Operation Helmet had a waiting list of 117 names. Disgracefully for the world's richest nation, with special shame on President Bush and the Pentagon for doing nothing to end the shortage, it was due to inadequate contributions, not manufacturing problems.

NOTE: The U.S. Army has been supplying its combat units with less expensive liner pads made by a skateboard helmet company.

According to emails received by Operation-Helmet.org, the government-issued pads are hot, hard and uncomfortable. Some GIs are removing the pads and pounding them with a hammer to make the material softer and more wearable, which reduces protection against explosions.

Our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve the BEST equipment available, not the cheapest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Universal healthcare is nice, but we won't get it until there is much bloodshed
Posted by: Trazom on Jun 25, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read a few comments here on Alternet that seem to diagnose the problem we the people face as a whole, as seen up above the forest, rather than looking at the leaves under the canopy. Whether it be public campaigns financed with private money, corporate control of the media, profit vs. care for healthcare, short-term profit vs. long-term sustainability on the environment and on our economy, or profligation of risky home loans to the ignorant lower and middle rungs of society, I think we are all talking about the same thing:

Unchecked capitalism. Capitalism itself was and still remains a wonderful invention of our modern world that has enabled some of the greatest thinkers to advance civilization while building tremendous wealth. For most of its life, society as a whole has benefited from this. Not until very recently in our post-industrial world has capitalism begun to malfunction for a growing percentage of the citizenry, but only because it has been allowed to morph into something resembling capitalism on the outside while mutating into something entirely new at its core. This, all thanks to the viral progression of greed that eventually works its way into every human system ever conceived.

Our 3 branches of government were conceived of by the Founding Fathers because they understood the root evil of all humankind. They realized it was in their country's interest to institute a system of checks and balances to safeguard against large usurpations of power by any one oligarchy or even by one person. And much like capitalism today in 2007, the system of governmental checks and balances is also under attack through the various measures of the present administration (don't need to go into specifics here). In fact, many of the problems we face today are the direct result of the erosion of the safeguards that were put into place to provide balance for these very systems. Even natural systems, like global climate. The ocean currents, the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, oceanic plankton, the square acreage of forests on the planet, etc., all these are safeguards to promote a balanced planet. But what are we doing? Ravaging parts of the Amazon to satisfy the lumber industry, fishing without regard to future populations and sustainability, and of course burning fossil fuels like there's no tomorrow. Any one of these forces gets out of whack, and you have what we have today. Capitalism does not exist in a vacuum. If it did, then I may be inclinded to say it is near perfect.

I will never truly understand the general population's myopic vision when it comes to these issues. Perhaps that is why I am so saddened by our species, not because of where we are today, but because I can see where we're going, and for some inexplicable reason an overwhelming majority either don't see it or don't care enough to speak up.

For those people who believe the market will correct these imbalances, I say to you: How to you place a check on greed? How do you convince people of wealth and influence that it is in their best interest to promote balance and sharing rather than inequality and hoarding? Until we can do this I don't think there is a future for humans, short of a violent uprising.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Free Market?
Posted by: StuartH on Jun 25, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The main objection to a nationally rational way of addressing health care is that it interferes with the free market.

The problem with this argument is that it fails to recognize
a basic fact: There is no "free market."

For one thing, where else in the economy, outside of the Mafia, does anyone get to say "Pay the astronomical prices we charge or die." Who questions the fine print when they are in pain? A patient is supposed to get up off the gurney and ask the ambulance attendant for the details of how the business is being administered?

Most people do not pay attention to what comes of tens of billions of dollars being spent on lobbying Congress and state legislatures. Why would business interests spend so much money? Public interest, right?

It is strictly an investment in pursuing the interests of profit.

Where in the Constitution does it say that citizens must put up money in equal amounts to have power of decision in the American governmental system?

What is supposed to equalize this special interest power is the voting power of citizens. Unfortunately, this is utterly dependent on there being an informated electorate. The Fourth Estate, having been bought out and brought under control by the same special interests is busy holding the electorate hostage.

Luckily, Michael Moore has the balls to actually play an honest Fourth Estate role, flouting the power of the vested interests.

We should all work to elect people to public office at all levels who also have the balls for the fight. The problem that has developed is that for too long, those elected to represent our interests have actually been cowards. We The People are responsible for that because we would rather elect people whose TV ads we like instead of people like Michael Moore, who tell the truth we would rather not hear.

My hope is that the era of "spin doctoring" is replaced by one in which We The People go for the doctors who believe that the medicine a Sicko society needs is straight stuff, without sugar coating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bdr
Posted by: RBenett on Jun 25, 2007 5:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Us Kaiser employees just received a letter from the company.
Apparently they have 'heard' that there might be some disparaging comments about Kaiser in the movie. So, they are asking us to keep an open mind. And, stay tuned for the official company response to SICKO. I can't wait!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Restrict campaign spending
Posted by: jmooney on Jun 26, 2007 4:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way to get action on something like this is to amend the Constitution to allow spending restrictions on the amount spent on campaigns so that Big Medical, Big Oil, Big Whatever, cannot buy and sell politicians. Our electoral system is broken. It is up for bid. We gnash our teeth and whine and cry and are all over the lot trying to fix this, fix that, when the one thing that MUST be fixed in order for anything else to be fixed goes unschathed except for feeble efforts every decade or so reform campaign finance by various carrot/stick voluntary methods.

Allow, via Constitutional amendment, states and Congress to reign in spending, and then lobby the hell out of states and Congress to do so, and we'll slowly make some progress out of the insane asyulum we are now in. Some liberal states will take the ball and run and others will follow. And while we're restricting campaign spending, let's go ahead and publically finance elections. People dumbly grumble when public financing is mentioned, but I'd rather campaigns be financed by the public as a whole than by profit-drive special interest groups.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

taking responsiblity
Posted by: unity1 on Jun 26, 2007 9:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
sicko is a shocker all right - I don't live in the US and we have a govt funded health system - but with all its faults, we know that no one is gonna tip us out on skid row - and none of us have to watch our child die, while some corporation argues the point and saves yet more dollars

I hope moores sicko will initate a UNITY and make some major changes because in truth people power is the ultimate power, you are the ones that pay the insurance, you are the ones that spend your hard earned dollars on the oil or at wal mart the truth is that you are the ones that keep everything going and if you stopped everything would fall down - idealistic - dam right

this is our world - not just theirs - people power is the ultimate power - theirs is fake -yet you pay the price over and over - there is something vitally wrong with humanity when they allow the fear and coruption to become a way of life and thats America folks

sicko is about taking responsiblity for your health, for not eating junk food, for supporting a healthy lifestyle so you don't need the hospitials

sicko is about making changes, UNITING for change

Sicko is about how controled and locked down you have all become - brianwashed by your own egos into thinking you are the best, when in reality you are either all killing one another with your guns like mad dog cowboys or off killing the rest of us with your guns like mad dog cowboys - never stopping for a moment to relaise that your culture has encultured you in the ages old MO - divide and conquer

sicko is about revealing who really runs this 'democracy' (sic)

sicko was great - hope it wakes you up enough - Moore has revealed it - now its up to you guys to make change happen

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sicko might kill Hillary's bid
Posted by: counterpoint on Jul 2, 2007 12:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the more demoralizing scences in the movie (I just saw it at the 10:15 pm show Sunday July 1st in Denver) was the one that showed how Hillary Clinton first failed with her health care initiative (why she failed, and perhaps should have failed, was not mentioned), then shut up about it for 7 years only to emerge as one of the top recipients of Health care provide campaign donations.
Speaks for itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anatomy
Posted by: alevander5 on Jul 15, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
реферат реферат валютная Painkiller Jane subtitles Deadwood subtitles принципиальные схемы география экономика Managing Scope Creep Dexter Филип Киркоров movies subtitles subtitles Desperate Housewives Desperate Housewives season 3 subtitles лирика тексты песен субтитры FILTRATION movie subtitles subtitles тачка порше Bedside Lamp Timer нло мистика Les Paroles de chansons Paroles тайны смолвилля смолвиль complete circuit digital Sex and the City rihanna lyrics Win API файлы платежные технологии Электронные платежные технологии Traveler series Traveler subtitles Relative to Be Investigated Бухгалтерский учет Бухгалтерский учет реферат PH VALUES Aquarium guide movies subtitles tv show subtitles Supernatural subtitles музыка лирика fish Рынок ценных бумаг Andy Barker, P.I. Andy Barker season1 subtitles Grey's Anatomy Grey's Anatomy subtitles субтитри movies subtitles

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]