Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Do We Pay Our Plumbers More Than Our Caregivers?

By Terrence McNally and Riane Eisler, AlterNet. Posted June 27, 2007.


Surely leaky pipes aren't more important than our children. Yet, in America, most plumbers make five times what caregivers do. Author Riane Eisler shows how our economic system, rooted in gender inequality, is failing us. An excerpt from her latest book follows.
eislerstory
Advertisement

Why does the stock market rally when workers are laid off? Why are working people consistently losing ground? Why do so many women and children live in poverty? Why is the average age of a homeless person in the United States 9 years old? Why are so many seniors forgotten? Why don't we plan ahead or invest well when it comes to things like the environment, education or healthcare?

Can the answer be that our economic signals are out of whack with reality?

An interview with Riane Eisler, author of The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics, shows how our current economic systems aren't solving our problems. If we want to address issues like poverty and environmental devastation, Eisler says, we must realize that the answer isn't in money; rather, it lies in the "contributions of people and nature."

An excerpt from The Real Wealth of Nations follows the interview.

Terrence McNally: Can you share a little bit about how your childhood experiences have influenced your life's work?

Riane Eisler: In terms of the social categories introduced by my earlier work -- the domination system and the partnership system -- I was born in Vienna at a time of massive regression to the domination side. From one day to the next, my whole world was wrenched asunder.

I was a little child on the first night of official Nazi terrorism against Jews, called Kristelnacht because so much glass was shattered in Jewish homes and synagogues. A gang of Gestapo broke into our home, and I watched horrified as they pushed my father down the stairs. But I saw not just this cruelty, I also saw spiritual courage, the courage to stand up against injustice out of love. My mother, recognized one of the men who had been an errand boy for our family business and got furious. She said, "How dare you do this to this man who has been so good to you?"

She could have been killed that night, but she survived and by a miracle was able to obtain my father's release. Eventually, of course, some money passed hands. By another miracle we escaped to Cuba, where, having lost everything, we lived in the industrial slums of Havana.

Now all of these experiences brought questions. When we have this enormous capacity for caring, for empathy, for love, for what I saw in my mother -- why is there so much cruelty, so much insensitivity and so much violence? Is it inevitable, or are there alternatives?

Seeking answers to those questions, I discovered that the conventional categories such as right versus left, religious versus secular, capitalist versus socialist, or east versus west, simply are not adequate. I could see patterns through my research for which there were no names, so I called one the partnership system and the other the domination system.

TMN: The Chalice and the Blade came out in 1987. It was a best seller and has been translated into many languages. As you look back, what do you feel has been its influence over time?

RE: I am very honored whenever people say that The Chalice and the Blade has changed their lives. Doing the research for that book has, of course, also changed my life in many ways. Categories are lenses, and these lenses are ways of connecting the dots, of showing how things that seem random are actually connected. Once we have that clarity, it not only empowers us individually, but it also empowers us to be more effective agents for cultural transformation.

TMN: Why did you write your new book, and what did you hope to accomplish with a book about economics?

RE: This is the third in a trilogy. The chalice and the blade are two symbols of power. The blade appropriate for the domination system, the power to dominate, to destroy, to take life. The chalice, very important but much ignored as a symbol of power, the power to give life, nurture, illumine, to empower rather than disempower. In the next book, Sacred Pleasure, I used the same analytical lenses of the partnership and domination systems to look at sex. Now The Real Wealth of Nations completes the trilogy of power, sex and money.

TMN: I considered asking the questions, "Why write about economics? Do people really pay attention to economics that much?" Today other things like war or religion or global warming seem to dominate our consciousness. But I came up with this answer: Economics are important because they determine how we keep score, how we track progress, how we reward, how we incentivize, how we express value, how we punish, how we plan, how we anticipate, how we evaluate and even perhaps how we envision the future.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: partnership system, domination system, caregiving, economics, eisler, real wealth of nations

Interviewer Terrence McNally hosts Free Forum on KPFK 90.7FM, Los Angeles (streaming at kpfk.org). Riane Eisler is author of the international best-seller The Chalice and the Blade; Our History, Our Future; Sacred Pleasure: Sex, Myth, and the Politics of the Body; The Power of Politics, and her newest, The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics. She is president of the Center for Partnership Studies and a fellow of the World Academy of Art and Science and the World Business Academy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Because an unflushed toilet stinks now...
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 27, 2007 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And a young person takes 18 years to stink. We are society that lives in the here and now. We respond quickly to what makes us uncomfortable now, and we lack patience for things that require nurturing and the long view. That is why plumbers get paid more.

Can you really imagine anyone tolerating water pouring through their ceiling, or their toilet backed up for a month or two? Plumbers are the drug dealers of home repairs. We know we gotta have their fix!

Young people are complicated, and we have made raising them more and more complicated by the year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Because an unflushed toilet stinks now... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» Is there no limit to your xenophobia? Posted by: xconservative
If child care providers were paid more it would be economically impractical...
Posted by: ateo on Jun 27, 2007 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...for so many women to work.

Women aren't going to stop having children and *someone* has to take care of those children. If childcare providers were paid more than minimum wage (I have no idea where this 10 dollars an hour figure comes from but the vast majority of day care centers (La Petite, Children's world, etc.) pay minimum wage even to workers with DECADES of experience. That's minimum wage to care for 15 or 30 children at once.

The answer to this is obvious. If a woman makes 30 grand a year (probably more than the average woman makes in America to be honest with you) that's about 13 dollars an hour. If it were to cost her 10 dollars an hour to pay for childcare then her net gain is 3 dollars an hour, less than minimum wage.

In order for nearly 100% of all women to be dedicated to their careers and the workforce childcare must continue to be dirt cheap. That means garbage salaries for those in the childcare industry.

Personal anecdote: my mother worked in the childcare industry basically her entire life. Not surprisingly we lived in HUD housing on welfare eating government cheese. Even with 10 or 15 years of experience she was making pennies above minimum wage. A buddy of mine got married and he said his wife does "child care." I cringed when I heard that because I know there is more money to be made as a greeter at Wal-mart than there is taking care of people's little brats.

Seems like the feminist agenda is working against itself on this one. You want women to work, have careers and make as much money as men yet you now want child care providers to make a livable income which would basically exclude any woman with children from the work place.

People are the cheapest of all commodities in the United States and children are not excepted from this. Yes people cling to their idealistic notions of people being "invaluable" but the reality is you're only worth how much money you have in the bank. Children have no money therefore they are worthless. I wonder how long it will be until people start abandoning their children enmasse to keep up their consumerist lifestyle when the economy starts to collapse?

Ah, it's going to be a fun decade for the armchair sadist in all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» In civilized countries... Posted by: SteveB
» thank you Posted by: Trazom
» Fathers? Posted by: s_mead
» Doesn't change a thing Posted by: ateo
Caring Economy
Posted by: suprmark on Jun 27, 2007 2:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I liked this article and think I will enjoy reading the book. However, based on this article and excerpt it seems to me Rianne Eisler thinks we should be able to put caring into the economy and get money out. I'm not sure how to phrase that better at the moment so I will try to explain what I mean. A plumber goes to a house and gets to fix whatever's broken, regularly dealing with hair, poo, used condoms, and whatever else goes down people's drains. No-one cares about the plumber, though, even if all this person's heart and soul went into the work, just the work that was done. This person can feel satisfaction from a job well done, but isn't going to feel any love from those pipes. It is rewarding financially, not emotionally. A child care worker on the other hand will feel love - from the children cared for and their parents. Years later this person might find out a child has done something impressive and can feel a part of that acomplishment, or run into someone and stop and have a coffee. Do plumbers feel pride when their pipes don't break after 5 years? When is the last time you had coffee with your plumber? Or, to put it another way, how much money would you pay to have the feeling that you inspired someone to greatness? Yet the author seems to imply this emotional capital is less valuable than financial gain. Should caregivers be paid more for what they do? Surely yes, but they must also remember that their reward for their work is not all financial.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Caring Economy Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Caring Economy Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Caring Economy Posted by: mazel
» RE: Caring Economy Posted by: Trazom
» RE: Caring Economy Posted by: suprmark
Have You Ever Tried to Replace a Kitchen Faucet?
Posted by: guybjones on Jun 27, 2007 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the author: try replacing a kitchen faucet while working in the cramped space underneath your kitchen sink and you'll fast understand why plumbers make what they do. I just replaced mine by myself, but it took me an entire day, and I had to remove the sink entirely to do it.

I have to say, I think the author's comparison of the compensation of plumbers to caregivers is specious and a poor example to draw in terms of attempting to comment on societal priorities. Why pick on plumbers? PLumbers and similar craftsmen have technical skills most people don't have and work in a risk-laden profession. Why not compare what corporate executives or Wall Street bankers make in contrast with caregivers? They contribute far less to society than a plumber does and work far less to earn their absurd compensation. And, by the way, teachers here in NYC, while not wealthy, earn solid salaries with 3 months vacation. The vacation alone is worth more than money to some folks. It preserves peace of mind and sanity during the hottest months of the year.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree Posted by: WhatNow?
» Quit picking on plumbers Posted by: John Wilbur
» Correction re teachers Posted by: edith
» what? Posted by: Trazom
» Sure Posted by: guybjones
May I disagree?
Posted by: WhatNow? on Jun 27, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The former Soviet Union was a disaster"

With villians(tyrant, dictator, murderer, thief) like stalin, using the USSR as an example of socialism is poor. It would be like portraying the US war on drugs as another good example of socialism. Gimme a break.

"Consider that without caring and caregiving none of us would be here. There would be no households, no work force, no economy, nothing."

Could you say the same thing about plumbing? Years ago, children were thrown to the wolves as soon as possible to make wages for their and their family's survival. Humanity survived despite the lack of child care. How much child care now involves pacifying a child with something like TV? That surely suggests that child care should be paid like plumbers.

I think this would be a better world if we had more plumbing and less breeding.

"But no attention is given in conventional economics to what is needed to produce high-quality human capital: caring and caregiving.

Nor is that all. Not only is the work of caregiving given little support in economic policy when it's done in the home. Work that entails caregiving is paid substandard wages in the market economy."

I've known a few working men (skilled labor), that stayed home to watch the kids while their wives went to work because her job was more lucrative and provided insurance. These men tended to get bored because it didn't give them enough to do to stay occupied. One I knew would finish all the chores by 10:00 AM and then wonder what to do the rest of the day.

I liked the article and think it makes alot of sense but there a few things I'm not buying. The author could have made better comparisons using another class of people to compare to child care givers than to workingmen/women that provide valuable services to others. I feel slighted a little. Your shelter is not that important but your brats are? Maybe demeaning child care so much will reduce the over valueing of breeding. I'm sick of this "sanctity of overpopulation(reproducing)". We need to stabilize or reduce the population via contraception instead of pandering to the capitalists and their dreams of ever expanding markets and a cheap labor pool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dusting Off Vladimir Posted by: edith
» RE: May I disagree? Posted by: Trazom
Care Giving Machines!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jun 27, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we want to address issues like poverty and environmental devastation, Eisler says, we must realize that the answer isn't in money; rather, it lies in the "contributions of people and nature." Best line on Alternet thus far!

As for caregivers.. many of my clients utilize "live-in's" as they term them. ALL are foreign.. Their pay is about $10/hour (+/-) but they also get meals and transportation and a place to live during the week. They usually go back to their family's on weekends.

Some are valued "family members" while others are treated as hired help.. Filipino's are perferred while other nationalities rank lower on the scale for various reasons.. I see it as exploitation not so much in pay but more in how they are viewed.. which machine is the best!!!!!

Funny, but many of these people are better educated than those that hire them.. especially the Filipinos..most are nurses and some are doc's!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wow do I disagree with you!
Posted by: deborama on Jun 27, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it's outrageous that you suggest paying those in the caring professions a living wage would somehow "debase" their work. This is the same old claptrap used to keep women down forever. We in the caring professions also have BILLS TO PAY. We don't get a break on our mortgages and car payments and gas bills because we're such good people. Everybody deserves a living wage, ESPECIALLY those who do the very hard work of caring for others in this cruel, heartless society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You’re paid what you’re worth. Posted by: White middleclass male
It all boils down to dollars and cents…
Posted by: EagleMB on Jun 27, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a mother makes $15 an hour and pays $12 per hour for childcare, after taxes she is losing money by choosing to work. Of course, the author is right about the problem being more than just economic. If a mother makes $18 per hour and pays $10 per hour for day care, the net result after taxes is between $3 and $4 per hour. For many mothers the opportunity to personally raise her kid is worth far more than $4 per hour. Therefore, the only way childcare providers can stay in business is to charge significantly less than what mothers are making in the workforce.

Then you get into supply and demand. There are so many childcare options that the price is driven down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» In civilized countries... Posted by: SteveB
» RE: In civilized countries... Posted by: cmaciain
» RE: In civilized countries... Posted by: cmaciain
» Oh no! EagleMB wrong again? Posted by: SteveB
» The GAO report does........ Posted by: Diecash1
» BTW................... Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: BTW................... Posted by: EagleMB
» Once again...... Posted by: Diecash1
» Business week article...... Posted by: Diecash1
» RE: Once again...... Posted by: EagleMB
Eldercare
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Jun 27, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eldercare. My sister works in Eldercare. She makes 11.00 to look after dying old people who can not feed, bathe, or toilet themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Markets make lousy gods
Posted by: hagwind on Jun 27, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a capitalist economy, work isn't "valued" -- i.e., paid -- according to how useful, difficult, dangerous, dirty, or important it is. How useful, difficult, dangerous, dirty, and/or important was the "work" done by Ken Lay at Enron, or Dick Cheney at Halliburton, or any of those other high-flying corporate guys? Socialist economies may have different criteria, but they aren't exactly fair, impartial, or even rational either. Long ago I was so impressed when I learned that two-thirds of the doctors in the USSR were women. In the USA at that time "doctor" was a well-paid and prestigious position, and women doctors were few and far between. I jumped to the conclusion that in the Soviet Union women held lots of well-paid and prestigious positions. Wrong. "Doctor" in the USSR was not a well-paid or prestigious position. The well-paid and prestigious positions were mostly held by men.

Let's not get obsessed with the relative worth of plumbers and caregivers, or teachers and sports stars, or doctors and nurses. The more important point is that although in some respects the market does a good job of allocating resources, there are certain things that the unregulated market doesn't do well at all, like consider the future. It can be adjusted to take the future into account; for instance, the cost of eventual disposal can be factored in to the cost of production, or consumers can be charged to get rid of their nonrecyclable, noncompostable trash.

The unregulated market is amoral. It doesn't give a damn about social justice or democracy. In the unregulated market, everything has its price, depending on how many people want it and how much they're willing to pay for it. The market doesn't make a distinction between, say, political offices and cars. Why should it? That's not its job. Abdicating political and ethical choices to the market is pretty much like turning it all over to a god whose guiding principle is "Whatever."

But no market is entirely unregulated. Markets do reflect values of the political as well as the monetary kind. And social structures are shaped by markets. The geographical distribution of the U.S. population was shaped by cheap gas and cheap electricity. The wages of a whole array of occupations are skewed by an abundance of cheap labor. For occupations that involve caregiving, that cheap (or free) labor has generally been female. When women's paid-job options were pretty much limited to teacher, nurse, and secretary, the pool for these jobs was large, the skill level high, and the salaries didn't come close to reflecting the value of those jobs to either employers or society at large. Give women more options, and we're less willing and able to work for peanuts. If society wants those jobs done, and done well, it can't leave everything up to the market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cute .... if true Posted by: BenCaxton12
how many caretakers would pass the plumbers' test?
Posted by: edith on Jun 27, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if you pay everyone the same, most people will choose the easiest, least time consuming job. Socialists and left liberals never quite advocate equal wages for everyone, but there is an implicit endorsement of equal wages in the very concept of "equality", disparate and often inherent differences in kinds of intelligence notwithstanding.

How may caretakers(day care workers, teachers(non-vocational), houseparents and babysitters can learn plumbing and do it perfectly? Answer: some, but until and unless those individuals spend time in a training program and take the recognized test in their state, we don't know. We do know most people can't pass the test or at least don't want to undergo plumbing training. As long as a demand for plumbers exists, and the economy is strong enough to support $75 plus per hr for a plumber, the plumbers are "worth" what they are paid, as are "caretakers".

Naturally we can and should esteem caretakers and say thank you every chance we get to give thanks and praise. But short of equal wages for all, the market sets the price of labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yabbut . . . Posted by: hagwind
» Are You Serious? Posted by: edith
» RE: Are You Serious? Posted by: hagwind
Francis
Posted by: Francis on Jun 27, 2007 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would it be asking too much to segregate and label commercial messages like this one from the efforts at actual journalism which grace your website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another AlterNet do-gooder hypocrite
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 27, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Terrence McNally is a Hollywood writer, producer and director who makes a helluva lot more than any caregiver. Why? Because of supply and demand.

Ask him which is more desirable work -- caring for kids or cleaning toilets?

That’s a rhetorical question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well Duh
Posted by: Trapper on Jun 27, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This doesn't require much thought.

Plumbing is hard and dirty, it takes years to get accredited, and there are few willing to plumb.
People let teenagers babysit, it is easy to get accredited, and there are many willing to do it.

Supply and demand, .. perhaps the author should try reading a few books instead of writing them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The difference between plumbing and child care
Posted by: fibrowitch on Jun 27, 2007 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the need for emergency services.

Three years ago, at 3 AM on December 25th, my furnace died. An old valve and given way, and the hot water which had been heating my home started spraying against my basement wall. I was renting at the time, and called my landlord. He found a plumber willing to come out in 10 degree weather and fix my furnace. We also needed the gas company to come and shut off the gas.

I have a good friend who works for an agency that provides nannies, and emergency child care services. She gets 8 dollars an hour for any work done between 7 am and 7 pm. She use to be available for emergency night time care. She would get beeped and need to travel to a clients home. If she got beeped after 7 pm she got ten dollars an hour. If she got beeped between midnight and 7 am she got 15 dollars an hour.

Do we really pay our plumbers more? Now that I own a house, I have called plumbers to schedule maintenance work. I do not pay them any where near what my landlord paid for the Christmas Day furnace call. The plumber I call is licensed, he must pay taxes on his business, and charge me a service tax, and carry several supplies and tools. He is a small business man who has to hustle, who works seven days a week to make his money.

Does he in the end, really 'make' more money than a child care worker? His job needs brute strength, is messier, and has taken a toll on his body. He is being undercut every day by people who do not follow the laws as he does.

I wonder, if the author has taken into account the different levels of child care available. As a professional Nanny, my friend makes a good income. There is a day care center near my home that pays it's employees just above the minimum wage. My neighbor 'takes in' three children after school and watches them until their parents get home, for which she gets sixty dollars a week. If we average the three 'jobs' together they do not pay very well. Yet each job is so different, with the professional Nanny doing very well.

Just a thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The difference between plumbing and child care Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Plumbers are worth more than Daycare workers
Posted by: Fade on Jun 27, 2007 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because Plumbing requires training and anyone can watch a few kids for hours on end. It's true. And I've got 4 kids and I'm a single parent who is VERY glad daycare doesn't cost more. It's easy- at the one I pay $190/week to, a bunch of sorority sisters walk lazily around all day in between lining them up, telling them to be quiet, and turning on the DVD player. I know there's a little more to it than that, but it's NOT hard. Plumbing sucks. One pipe gets put on loose, and your house may flood. Want to skimp on that? I Dont look to Daycare to be my kids Parents, mkay? I am the parent, and the moment I pick them up til the moment at daycare to the moment I drop them off in the mornings, its not likely I'll somehow forget that. I don't WANT a daycare "Parenting" my kids, anyway. Watch em. Let them have fun. Dont abuse them, and maybe a bit of teaching thrown in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT'S PERCEPTION
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 27, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Child care in any form is about 'mothering'. You remember: housewife & mother. Historically it pays nothing. Women still only earn about 75 cents on a male dollar. Motherhood in all its glory is still not a high paying job and that perception carries through to child care. Don't need college or a high IQ. The mothers and women who care for their children are in the same boat. Each can barely afford the other. Neither can afford a plumber. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I thought the book was about "wealth," even "real" wealth.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jun 27, 2007 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No wonder headline writers can make a living. Even on AlterNet, folks consume the package rather than the contents. The plumber/caregiver was a rhetorical question. That means no one is looking for an answer or cares about yours if that's all you know.

Yes, we live in a time where currency and property (tradeable for currency) are identified as wealth. So when you ask what is wealth worth, (maybe, "if you ask" since so few understand) we are plunged into a system that measures itself by its own standards. Yes, in a world where everything is for sale, that seems to work. Then human suffering becomes a mere epiphenomenon, an "unexpected consequence," or a stroke of fate.

Back in the 60s, we were discussing the evidence that our economy seems to need human suffering. Harrington's "The Other America" brought the issue out of the shadows. We even had a war on poverty. Today, we have solved the problem by building bigger jails, because we can do that with money alone.

Families that survive poverty and prosper get little attention. The lie is that everyone is supposed to know how to do that. The secret for doing that is worth more than even Cheney's million$, even though he destroyed the war on poverty in his path to riches.

Believe me: life is all about what we value. For those who can see that currency is a mere tool, necessary today in order to survive to allow us to learn the value of spending our time (that's the real wealth--time) wisely, they provide the model.

I don't mean to be cloying, but does anyone remember "Blessed are the poor in spirit (the humble) for their's is the kingdom of heaven (right here and now)"? To find "real wealth," look at someone who is humble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is some truth about the dirty secrets of plumbers. They don't get ripped off unlike doctors.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 27, 2007 1:43 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plumbers don't get held accountable for FAILING to show up for their appointments but doctors get sued to their throats. In addition, the insurance companies and Big Pharma tend to persecute doctors far more than they do plumbers. Whatever you do, don't let a plumber make you pay for an appointment for which they don't show up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Idiotic!
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Jun 27, 2007 1:48 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who has saved more lives, plumbers, or doctors?
Plumbers! Without sanitary system we would be swimming in our own feces and our modern cities would be death pits of disease.

You ever tried lugging a 200 lb shower up 18 stories in 40'C weather?

Playing games and teaching kids would be a dream compared to a plumber.

Stop trying to make raising children a profession, its not.
Otherwise every dad and mom out there are working two jobs 24/7. Who is going to pay them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Myriad of Roles of Teacher (i.e. caretaker): Educator/Teacher, Psychologist,
Posted by: freethink7 on Jun 27, 2007 2:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Counselor, Parent, Nurse/Doctor, Cheerleader, Motivator, Mediator, Diplomat, Confidant, Chauffer, the list goes on and on. Overworked and underpaid, definitely. Eternal passion for education and passion for working with children while simultaneously attempting to make the world a better place drives most of us that teach school. (and yes, summers off are a nice respite….we as teachers need it as do the children).

Plumber plays one role while raking in a pile of money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PLUMBERS DO GOOD WORK! DO HEALTH PROFESSIONALS?
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 27, 2007 4:30 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am sure I will incur the wrath of many colleagues and AlterNet readers but maybe if health professionals did better work- meaning more effective interventions and achieving better outcomes -instead of medicalizing all our social ills and even worse now harming people through excessive drug, surgical and diagnostic misadventures we should pay them more?

Whew - a mouthful!

See two landmark books written 30 years apart. Ivan Illich's "Medical Nemesis" and Nortin Hadler's "The Last Well Person" on Amazon.com

Thanks and Be Well,

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Plumbers deseve to earn more
Posted by: Mamarianne on Jun 28, 2007 7:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many readers of this article do not understand that labor costs on a bill do no equal what is paid to the man or woman who does the actual work--be it plumbing, mechanics, or housepainting. The actual hourly rate the guy (or gal...many females are in plumbing) who skinnies under the house amid the spiders and dirt to find the poop leaking out of a pipe is not the labor fee on the bill. I have done child care. I may have dealt with poop, but I worked in a sanitary (thanks to plumbers and janitors) well lighted place (thanks to electricians). Skilled labor is underappreciated. The work takes years to learn. Many of these jobs take a huge toll on the body. Sure, childcare workers deserve a living wage, but if a day care center is forced to close for a day due to plugged sewers, most parents can manage to take care of the kids ok, but they are unlikely to have the skills (or the stomach) to solve the sewer problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's the time, the working conditions, the bond, the insurance
Posted by: lulunw on Jun 28, 2007 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It takes about three years to become a plumber.
You need on-the-job experience plus a pretty tough test to get a plumber's license.
You need to post a bond, then you need to buy insurance (in my state it may be up to a million, based on the type of work the plumber needs to perform. Finally they need to pay worke's comp if they hire anybody.
The plumber will work in any weather, and under any conditions - heat, dust, cold, incredibly dirty. They work with tools that can maim. Plumbers need to have some knowledge of Physics and Chemistry (a lot more actually than college graduate with a liberal arts degree). They also need to understand the Uniform Construction Codes - a pretty complicated set of codes that regulate the construction industry and that changes every three years or so.

When the states will require that much time and that kind of financial effort, I am sure the cost of caring for a child will shoot up accordingly.

The title of this article shows how uninformed the writer is on the condition of skilled trades in this country, and what it takes to become a skilled worker.

Shame on you and your pseudo-intellectual pretensions!!!

PS. I am not a plumber.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The demand is increasing as both providers work, supply is restricted...
Posted by: poppop_schell on Jun 28, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by licensing laws, and unions work with government to prevent entry of people into the plumbing profession. It is NOT a free market but it does take education, skills and willingness to do a lot of "dirty" work.

Child care Providers are in plentiful supply and mostly use their earnings to supplement income,:it is not primary source of family income.

Bottom line, however, is that this was NOT a problem when one spouse devoted themselves to child-raising and weren' caught up in having the gadgets of life and trying to keep up with the Jones. And when we had nuclear families and caring neighbors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get a different job then retards...
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Jun 28, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are so overworked and underpaid, get a different job.
Only an idiot would allow themselves to be exploited.

Quit crying and quit, go find different work if its so bad.
Thats why they have to hire Mexicans to do Farm work.
We won't do farm work.

We are spoiled brats who can't hack it, we have to rely on immigrants to get the job done.

Pathetic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eisler's choice of title is misleading
Posted by: brab on Jun 28, 2007 6:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Riane Eisler, in your choice of title you employ the classic "race to the bottom" phraseology:

“Why Do We Pay Our Plumbers More Than Our Caregivers?”

The wording should have been:

“Why Do We Pay Our Caregivers Less Than Our Plumbers?”

The first version implies we should lower the wages of plumbers to those of minimum wage caregivers. I hope you didn’t really mean that.

When Ford, Chrysler and GM automakers bemoan the fact that import manufacturers Toyota and Honda have significantly lower labor costs than they, the glorified solution is to lower the wage costs of the Big Three employees. No mention is ever made to balance the playing field by raising the labor costs of Toyota and Honda by requiring equal pay and benefits.

Would we really improve the eonomic life of caregivers by reducing the income of plumbers? The phraseology is important because it subconsciously programs the public to expect that outcome. Two negatives never make a positive.

William F. Brabenec
One Birch Trails, PO Box 66
Attica, Michigan 48412
810-724-2722  /  brab@tir.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's to figure?
Posted by: Kwatt on Jul 1, 2007 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So plumbers make more money than caregivers... Upon weighing the arguments put forth by the author and the various commenters, it seems that the cause is down to only two possibilities. Either it's a vast male conspiracy to keep women down or it's what the market will bear. After pondering this veritable conundrum for a few microseconds, I have reached my decision. It's the market. I base this novel conclusion on the fact that slavery was abolished a long time ago, therefore, all job-holders are working for the maximum compensation that they can negotiate. Can’t negotiate higher? Congratulations, you have found the market limit. Of course not everyone is satisfied with their pay. I suppose some people are satisfied, but strangely enough, I have never met the person, he or she, who claimed to be overpaid. Hence, polls will show that it is only other people who are overpaid, regardless of gender. Would you pay $75 per hour for a plumber (male or female) to fix a backed-up toilet. I know I sure would. But would you pay $75 per hour for a babysitter? Or a teacher? Maybe somebody would, but as long as I can find someone cheaper, nothing doing. If there is a gender imbalance in compensation for a job, it is not due to a sinister male plot. It is purely because the women who take those jobs are willing to accept the pay inequity. In other words, it’s the market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »]