Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Genarlow Wilson's Tragic Sentencing for Consensual Oral Sex

By Van Jones and James Rucker, Color of Change. Posted June 19, 2007.


After a judge dismissed the sentence of Genarlow Wilson -- an honor roll student and homecoming king serving 10 years in prison for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old when he was 17 -- Georgia's attorney general appealed, leaving Wilson stuck in jail.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Van Jones James Rucker

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Last Monday, June 11, a judge finally dismissed the sentence of Genarlow Wilson, the honor roll student and homecoming king serving ten years in prison for having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old when he was 17. In granting Wilson's habeas corpus petition, Georgia Superior Court Judge Thomas Wilson wrote that it would be a "grave miscarriage of justice" for Wilson to be kept in prison for the remaining eight years of his sentence.

Yet, immediately after the judge's ruling, Georgia's attorney general, Thurbert E. Baker, filed a notice saying that his office would appeal the decision, leaving Wilson stuck in jail. Baker's actions have not only robbed Wilson of his long overdue freedom, they epitomize the insanity of a justice system that seems hell-bent on criminalizing young black men.

At a New Year's Eve party in 2003, Wilson had consensual oral sex with another teen -- she was 15 and he was 17. Under an old Georgia law, he was convicted of aggravated child molestation, a charge intended for adult sexual predators. Sexual intercourse with the same girl would have been a misdemeanor under a "Romeo and Juliet" exemption for contact between minors; but because the exemption did not mention oral sex, Wilson, an honors student and star athlete with no prior criminal record, received a mandatory ten-year sentence without possibility of parole.

No one, from his teen "victim" to the jurors at his trial, wanted Wilson to go to jail, but at every turn the Georgia justice system and Georgia's legislature failed him -- first convicting him under an archaic law; then passing a law to include oral sex in the minor's exemption but not writing the law so it would apply retroactively; and finally refusing to bring a second bill up for a vote that would have retroactively applied the oral sex exemption and allowed for Wilson's release. It's hard to believe that race is not a factor in this case.

At the same time Wilson was being tried, Kari McCarley, a white 27-year-old teacher, was being tried in the same courthouse for having sex with a 17-year-old student. She got 90 days in jail and three years of probation. While Wilson's prosecutor, David McDade, has claimed that he was "standing up for African-American victims in this case," he hardly seems credible, since the "victim" did not want to press charges and did not even testify for the prosecution.

In his statement overturning Wilson's sentence on Monday, Superior Court Judge Thomas Wilson said: "If any case fits into the definitive limits of a miscarriage of justice, surely this case does." Why, then, is Georgia's attorney general trying to keep Wilson in jail? Baker says he's compelled to appeal, but as attorney general, appealing is completely at his discretion. Baker is ignoring the outrage of nearly everyone associated with the case, and thousands of Americans across the country, by keeping this innocent young man in jail.

In his order granting Wilson's release, Judge Wilson wrote: "If this court, or any court, cannot recognize the injustice of what has occurred here, then our court system has lost sight of the goal our judicial system has always strived to accomplish: Justice being served in a fair and equal manner." Baker's actions are clearly at odds with justice being served in this case. It's time that he withdraws his appeal so Genarlow Wilson can finally come home.

You can add your voice to more than 15,000 others demanding that Baker drop his appeal by clicking here, or you can call his office directly at 404-656-3300.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: genarlow wilson

Van Jones is executive director of the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights in Oakland, Calif. James Rucker served as director of Grassroots Mobilization for MoveOn.org Political Action and Moveon.org Civic Action from the fall of 2003 through the summer of 2005.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: Bad luck!
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Jun 19, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bad luck, my ass! It's another clear case of "black in public".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WTH are you on about? Posted by: Techubus
» RE: WTH are you on about? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Women are so easy????? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Man that's bizarre Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Women are so easy????? Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: Bad luck! Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Bad luck! Posted by: unity1
RE: Bad luck!
Posted by: pito516 on Jun 19, 2007 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How ignorant does one have to be to make a foolish comment like this? Injustice is injustice be it Black, White , or purple. It's mentalities like this that keeps the segregationalist wheels turning that need to be stopped once and for all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bad luck! Posted by: gerty954
» RE: Bad luck! Posted by: pito516
I was going to write AlterNet to carry this story
Posted by: asilsfable on Jun 19, 2007 1:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when I was emailed about it through Color of Change, Van and James' offshoot from MoveOn.org.

Please call, or at least, sign the petition and urge everyone you know to follow suit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

3.5
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 19, 2007 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One thing that bothers me about this story is that everybody keeps saying he's an honors student, star athelete, homecoming king, Nobel Prize winner, astronaut, superhero...as if any of that stuff matters.

Is this about injustice or rising stars? Would everyone be so quick to support him if he was the fat kid with thick glasses, or some underachieving slacker?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 3.5 Posted by: patti_s
» RE: 3.5 Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: 3.5 - you idiot Posted by: schokoprinz
» RE: 3.5 Posted by: dlf
» RE: 3.5 Posted by: pito516
» Good point Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Good point Posted by: patti_s
» RE: Good point Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Good point Posted by: anonymous black writer
» RE: 3.5 Posted by: Katrinepa
Finally, an AlterNet article with legs.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 19, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully, more AlterNet writers will do what Jones and Rucker did by including a link for readers to communicate their opinions -- in this case, to Georgia Attorney General Baker about Wilson's plight.

Here's my comment that was transmitted to Baker's office several miniutes ago:

"In November 1993, I retired from Delta Air Lines in Atlanta. The city was racist then and appears the same today -- the major reason, I believe, why the state is defending Genarlow Wilson's miscarraige of justice. For God sakes, Mr. Baker, show some humanity and let the young man go free!"

Signed Hugh E. Scott

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why the appeal?
Posted by: BrianInNOVA on Jun 19, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have looked but can't find any explanation for why AG Baker has filed an appeal, except for the standard PR line that is used whenever an AG does something that is clearly stupid, unfair, or unpopular, i.e., "I am compelled by the law." I don't think it is racism. AG Baker is an African-American himself. So, why is he appealing the decision? Anyone out there with some more information?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What was it Ice Cube said... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Hi ateo Posted by: Veronique
» RE: What was it Ice Cube said... Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: Why the appeal? Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Why the appeal? Posted by: mom'z the word
What was he thinking??
Posted by: MAD on Jun 19, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One can only assume that a 17-year-old girl would be handed down a similar sentence for performing the exact same sexual act with a 15-year-old boy, right?

We all know better than that though, don't we? Shit, female Junior High teachers are receiving little more than a slap on the wrist for sleeping with pre-adolescent students, so that wouldn't even raise an eyebrow nowadays.

This is wrong on so many levels it just makes you sick. Although he should have known better . . . black kid giving into such a completely abberant and atypical urge like that. I mean really - a 17-year-old kid receiving fellatio at a party from someone who falls right in his general age bracket. And we all know that 15-year-old girls are such little angels these days, what with Paris and Britney to look up to. What the hell made this kid think that he had the right to defy the self-righteous yet (quite frequently) deviant and hypocritical religious right anyway? Did he think he would get away with it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

lets get this AG out of office
Posted by: bmckee on Jun 19, 2007 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I called and left a message at 404-656-3300. Make sure you emphasize that you want campaign against his reelection.

You should call too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jim Crow Redux
Posted by: BeeGee on Jun 19, 2007 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I first readf this story on a conspiracy blog, I immediately suspected the truth. I looked at the sentence, the location, and the "perpetrator's" name and had no doubt that he was black. How horrible to find that was true. Is there no way ACLU can work a rights issue around this and deliver the justice he so rightly deserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meanwhile...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jun 19, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A man who posed as a firefighter to kidnap and rape a woman.... got 20 years. So... only twice as long for real rape.. AND kidnapping... than consensual oral sex between two minors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Meanwhile... Posted by: patti_s
Religion? Or Jealousy?
Posted by: Gisele on Jun 19, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I can see, this reeks of a re-election ploy to sucker in the religious right one more time. After all...everyone knows how upright and moral politicians and, preachers have been over the past few years.

Who knows what really motivates the AG in his zeal to ruin this young man's life...but if he's trying to make the religious right feel good about voting for him again, there's a verse or two that I'd like them all to read: Matthew 15:17 and 18.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eligion? Or Jealousy? Posted by: LoveYourEnemies
HOW MUCH IS THIS COSTING?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 19, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody involved here works for free. Jail costs money. Racist? I don't know. Expensive, yes. Doesn't anyone in Georgia care how their money is wasted. Go find a real criminal. Send Wilson home so he can go to school where he really belongs. I hope he's been taking losts of notes in the slammer. Genarlow, good luck with your book. This is a story that has to be told. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOW MUCH IS THIS COSTING?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 19, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody involved here works for free. Jail costs money. Racist? I don't know. Expensive, yes. Doesn't anyone in Georgia care how their money is wasted. Go find a real criminal. Send Wilson home so he can go to school where he really belongs. I hope he's been taking losts of notes in the slammer. Genarlow, good luck with your book. This is a story that has to be told. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Better Late Than Never
Posted by: ilene on Jun 19, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've signed the petition and of course am outraged. Why however has it taken so long for this story to make it to the "news"? It wouldn't been nice to hear about this sooner so this kid (and others) don't spend time behind bars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A foolish and ignorant electorate elects foolish and ignorant representatives...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 19, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...who write or neglect to change foolish and ignorant laws. The foolish and ignorant electorate is offered a chance to correct foolish and ignorant charges...but foolish and ignorant people behave exactly as you expect they would. They throw up their foolish and ignorant hands, roll over, and do what they're told by a judge instead of recalling ninth grade civics and excersing their power as arguably the only true democracy within this republic.

Jury nullification. Never forget that our Constitution gives us the right to find someone guilty or not.

If you ever have the opportunity, always do what is right as a juror, and don't be herded into doing what somebody in a robe tells you, instructs you, or otherwise seeks to usurp YOUR right as a citizen to meet justice to your fellows. Don't be ignorant of your rights as a juror, don't foolishly throw away the rights of your fellows.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jury nullification Posted by: oregoncharles
Imagine if you will...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jun 19, 2007 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... every kid under 18 who has ever had consensual sex with a partner under 18 going to jail for 10 years.

Where, exactly, is the terrible crime in two kids having sex that merits ANY jail time??????

what kind of fucked up world do we live in that we contemplate sending kids to jail for having sex??????????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just the TIP of the Iceberg.....
Posted by: picket on Jun 19, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Prosecutors....absolutely refuse to admit that they ever make a mistake and have to be forced to disgorge their innocent victims. Nothing makes a prosecutor more angry than have to give back a wrongfully convicted person's life".

Google ..."Prosecutor's Gone Wild" Paul Craig Roberts
Excellent facts to consider.
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts12122006.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No one ever mentions how he was caught
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Jun 19, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His 'victim' was not a complaining witness, so how was he charged to begin with? Did she write about it in her diary or an email? Was it captured by cell phone camera? Was it done in plain view of other party attendees?

I don't imagine that Georgia is concerned to end a crime epidemic of consensual sex between partners of two years age difference. But imagine this scenario: when the team wins, the girls who want to be with the in in crowd draw straws or choose one who 'rewards' the top jock, in full view of the others, so that it can be verified. School administrators find out and vow to stop the practice.

Does anyone know the details about how this came to trial?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Date Rape? Troubling aspects to this case. Facts seem to be hidden and only
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 19, 2007 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
one-side is mentioned.
1) was there any testimony from the "victim"? If so, was it "positive" for the defendent or did she testify for the prosecuter? Did she recall the event clearly or was she hung-over? How/why did the police find out about this "incident" anyway? Was their other violence, sex acts, loud noise compliants, etc that caused the police to be informed on the incident or breakup the wholesome 'party'?
2) was alcohol involved in any fashion? If so who provided that booze and how much, and by whom, was it consumed?
3) were any drugs involved? If so, what type, who provided them, and who did them?
4) who rented the hotel room since these people were of a young age? was that person also in the room? was any of the 'party' filmed? were the events planned (there is evidence of planning in the crime: getting a room, getting booze/drugs, luring the women to a 'party'- then you have more of a real rape event and not a 'date' rape or 'statuory' situation.)

It would seem to me, from the limited facts, that this is more of a "date rape" scenario in which a young girl is pressured into performing a sex act on an older boy by peer-pressure (the other people in the room and the defendent) and by over-indulgence of alcohol/drugs provided by the boy. Very common and in this day and age is called 'date rape' and is prosecutable. "Boys will be boys" is no longer an excuse for rape.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Consensual is as consensual does. Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Consensual is as consensual does. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Have a clue? Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Have a clue? Posted by: YogiBear
» Yeah. Realized that after posting. Posted by: ABetterFuture
None
Posted by: RDVSR on Jun 19, 2007 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just plain stupid "justice". I don't think it is because he is black, or not fat, or whatever. It perplexes me that the powers in the State don't just drop the sorry "law enforcement" and let the kid out.
And I surely am not a "left winger". Justice is justice for all. This boy isn't getting it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More in-depth article
Posted by: at131 on Jun 19, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=wilson

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: More in-depth article Posted by: Veronique
Ahh, the United States... what a country
Posted by: paschn on Jun 19, 2007 2:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ON the one hand, you have a president DIRECTLY responsible for killing upwards of 1,000,000 human beings, raping the constitution, hell, raping an entire nation, ( granted it's a nation of sheep but still..), Let his own people ROT in Louisiana, stole an election, figuratively, (I hope only figuratively), wiped his pink coddled rear with our constitution, executes a seated head of state for killing 1/4th the number of human beings he's killed so far. What does HE GET?? re-elected. Some 17 year old that got consensually nothing more or less than what the corporations get EVERY DAY from our "leaders" and he gets 10 years. Hell, I don't know whether to laugh insanely, or vomit in disgust.
A nation of sheep, led by a cartel of whores, controlled by Israel / big business. Welcome to the REAL Evil Empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another example of "sex offender" hysteria
Posted by: Libertine on Jun 19, 2007 2:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as the notion of "sexual harassment" went overboard several years ago to the point where a six year old boy was charged with "sexual harassment" for kissing a girl his own age on the cheek, the Wilson case is a prime example of the current War on Sex Offenders gone awry.

Because so much emotion surrounds any offense having to do with sex, rationality in justice has largely gone out the window in the US. Everyone agrees that forcible rape where there is an unambiguously unwilling victim is wrong, just as the molestation of young children by adults is clearly wrong.

But to include teens/young adults separated by only a few years engaging in CONSENSUAL sex as "sex offenders", lumping them in with violent rapists and pedophiles is clearly injustice. Parents whose teens got involved in what they considered as unwise sexual relationships used to handle such things privately. Now, many parents want the legal system to do it for them.

I hope that Genarlow Wilson is soon freed and allowed to continue his education, get on with his life, and put this nightmare behind him.`

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Confidential Therapy for Unreported Molesters
Posted by: blschneider on Jun 19, 2007 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
88% of molesters are not reported. The kids don't tell for various reasons. And some offenders would like professional help in order to learn self-control.

Catch 22: Therapists must report offenders, who then face jail plus a lifetime on the registry as social outcasts. So, they do not get help--and neither do their victims.

YOU CAN HELP TO CHANGE THIS LAW! Our lawmakers need to see public support for helping molesters who voluntarily seek professional treatment. Please go to www.therapy-key.com and send in your petition. Every signature counts!

Thanks very much!

Betty Schneider
Director, Therapy Key

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It seems justice was served in this case...
Posted by: EagleMB on Jun 19, 2007 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have found that when AlterNet posts stories like this one, they always leave out crucial facts that would alter public perception. It should be noted that the conviction of Wilson was appealed, but the appeal was denied. The release of Wilson was ordered by a Superior Court judge after an appellate court (a higher court) upheld the conviction. After reading the actual court opinion, it seems clear to me that justice was served in this case.

Genarlow Wilson was caught on video having sex with a 17 year old girl, and receiving oral sex from the 17 year old girl and a 15 year old girl at a New Years Eve motel party. The following morning the 17 year old told her mother that she was raped. The police investigated and charged Wilson with rape and aggravated child molestation. The jury acquitted Wilson of rape, but found him guilty of the aggravated child molestation.

The sex between Wilson and the 17 year old appeared to be consensual (in the video) in that she did not fight, but it was noted that she was in a “semi-conscious state.” Georgia’s rape statute is very narrow and states: “A person commits the offense of rape when he has carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will. Carnal knowledge in rape occurs when there is any penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ.” Thus, in order for a person to be raped in Georgia, the perpetrator must have her vagina penetrated by a penis, and that penetration must be forcibly obtained AND against the woman’s will.

So what happened in this case? Most likely the jury found it reprehensible that Wilson had sex with the 17 year old while she was in a drunken state (which is rape in most states). However, since the videotape showed that no force was used, it was not rape in the state of Georgia. However, Wilson clearly violated the aggravated child molestation statute. Thus, in order to ensure Wilson was punished for his actions, they convicted him of the latter crime.

When the punishment for a crime far outweighs the egregiousness of the crime, juries are not hesitant to acquit, even though a statute is violated. The opposite is true as well. When an action is very egregious, but technically outside the purview of a statute, juries will often convict. This is one of the reasons why we have trial by jury. The fact that the jury (who heard the facts) chose to convict Wilson, and that the court of appeals denied his appeal (indicating no error), and that the Georgia Supreme Court denied certiorari, it seems clear that the jury was repulsed by the actions of Wilson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your facts are wrong... Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Your facts are wrong... Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: Your facts are wrong... Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: It was not the DA... Posted by: EagleMB
shawn
Posted by: wishninja on Jun 19, 2007 5:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Manditory minimums should be unconstitutional.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Revolting
Posted by: Jnutter on Jun 19, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story absolutely revolts me. This boys life has been completely destroyed and for what? for what??

Americans are obsessed with blow jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: evolting Posted by: Ames
» RE: evolting Posted by: Blade
THE AGE OF CONSENT
Posted by: gellero on Jun 19, 2007 5:50 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SHOULD BE 15 YEARS OLD.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE AGE OF CONSENT Posted by: Ames
» Blah, blah, blah Posted by: ateo
» RE: Blah, blah, blah Posted by: Ames
» RE: Blah, blah, blah Posted by: Blade
KKK
Posted by: bob t on Jun 20, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I can say is that the KKK still rides in Georgia, a truly rethuglikkkan state. Genarlow Wilson is paying an unjust price for what mey be a sin of being a teenager but is no crime, or is a crime of no consequence since it was consensual sex done between teenagers.
Shame on AG Baker.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Go figure....BTW EagleMB :The 'Bitch' with the scales..she's drunk and a racist
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jun 20, 2007 4:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..and full of the 'arbitrary and capricious'...just so you know..
that WE know... :O)

California DA: Witnesses, DNA evidence not enough to prosecute rape case Posted by Jessica Valenti at 8:19 AM on May 28, 2007.[Alternet]
Jessica Valenti: A travesty.
This post, by Jessica Valenti, originally appeared on Feministing.
Nice to know that if you get gang raped and there are fucking eyewitnesses, your case won't get prosecuted.
What's the penalty for the alleged gangrape of a drunk, 17-year-old girl at a party with 10 of your buddies? Bupkus, said the Santa Clara, California District Attorney's office yesterday.
The alleged rape occurred March 3 at a wild, off-campus party hosted by a member of the DeAnza College men's baseball team in San Jose, California. Three partygoers, members of the school's women's soccer team, said they saw a young girl on a mattress on the floor, clothes around her ankles and vomit on her face, with one man on top of her and approximately 10 more looking on in a dark bedroom. Feeling "something wasn't right," the girls pushed their way into the room and rushed the victim the the hospital.
20-year old April Grolle, one of the women who intervened, said "One of the guys who was in the room said 'This is her fault. She got drunk and she did this to herself.'"
Assistant District Attorney David Tomkins said, "We looked at every shred of evidence in this case, and we used every procedural avenue available to us to examine the facts. We discussed it and decided there was insufficient evidence of any crimes being investigated." Lovely. So no charges will be brought against the men, who were members of the De Anza College baseball team. The only punishment? Eight baseball players were suspended, and three games were cancelled. Yeah. I'm just so sick over this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did he do it?
Posted by: bookwoman on Jun 20, 2007 5:47 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, we have a homecoming king and top student, and everyone wants to let him out of jail because he is a homecoming king and a top student.

Isn't this another Paris Hilton moment. When it was a rich white girl, everyone was clamoring that she should serve the sentence she deserved for her crime.

Did he commit a crime according to Georgia law. The girl was 15; she can't have consensual sex.

If you don't like what happened, change the law, but don't let people out of jail because they are homecoming king and a top student or a rich white girl.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DOESN'T MATTER WHAT THE EVIDENCE IS...THE VICTIM IS WHITE!
Posted by: thetruth07 on Jun 20, 2007 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I always said "The South will always be the South". You see it doesn't matter what happened in any situation involving a white victim, someone has got to pay, especially if the accused is black. This kid is gonna rot in jail and come out as an sexual offender.
Even if evidence clears the accuser, the person will have served most of his life behind bars anyway and only when enough media pressure is applied then the accuser is given their freedom.
We seem to forget in this country that a black person can be jailed and put to death at just the word of a white person (whether it be true or not). And in most cases just the word will do, no jail, no trial, just death!!
So, here we are in 2007 with DNA evidence to clear the accuser you can still serve time as in the case of Darryl Hunt in North Carolina.
So, you see the South still rises.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your flexible I see
Posted by: mike_lee on Jun 20, 2007 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love how you start by saying our brains don't form until 25 or so, call the 15 year old a girl and the 17 year old an "Older guy." Make up your double minded brain. Unless things have changed a 15 year old girl is slightly more or at least as mature as a 17 year old boy Especially given the fact the are big city kids. I'm from Boston and by 11 we were all experienced, by 15 I could hold my own with grown women (I'm really embarrassed to say these things, but were not talking about Chachi and Joanie.) She didn't go to a drunken bash in a motel room full of boys to read bible stories. One more thing, girls are very different these days and they aggressively go after sex like boys have always done, I hate this phony 1950's chivalry.

While the daughter hasn't been shown the mother has and she is white.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your flexible I see Posted by: Blade
Why racism?
Posted by: judep on Jun 20, 2007 11:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think all of the commentary on this travesty of justice miss the boat. Obviously Baker has issues with oral sex!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anybody know...
Posted by: EagleMB on Jun 21, 2007 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the race of the other 5 people charged in this case?

They where:

Narada Williams, Ryan Barnwell, Cortez Robinson, Adrien Willis and Frankie Henry

Please provide a cite. Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sate
Posted by: mike_lee on Jun 22, 2007 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know the 5os were a dark period in American life, they produced all the rebellion of the sixties and seventies. Step away from your white perspective for a tic and consider Jim Crow laws, wife beating was rampant but that's because it wasn't a crime, men who fought in WW2 had so many issues and no one ever talked about them, but the war destroyed a lot of families, half of all 1950s marriages ended in divorce, homosexuals were sentenced to prison terms, anti communist witch hunts. a higher out of wedlock birth rate then the 80's

I have to turn the tables on you and ask if you know what chivalry is because standing up for a victim of injustice is the very definition of chivalry. Laying your new London Fog overcoat across a mud puddle for a woman is just stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Genarlow Lawson case
Posted by: jmp3954 on Jun 23, 2007 6:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This example of "morals" policing is certainly despicable, and the Georgia attorney general's decision to appeal the verdict of the Superior court is even more so. But it could have been worse - in a jurisdiction where strict Islamic law was in effect the girl may well have been sentenced to death by stoning, and this could have also been the fate of Mr. Lawson, depending on the family and clan connections involved. Both would certainly have been subject to severe and barbaric punishment. What do you suppose their fate might have been under Hamas, the new heroes of the radical lefties on AlterNet? And after all, the attorney general of Georgia was freely elected, just as Hamas was.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Genarlow Lawson case Posted by: mike_lee
» RE: Genarlow Lawson case Posted by: jmp3954
HE RAPED AN UNCONSCIOUS GIRL; WHY DON'T YOU TALK ABOUT THAT?
Posted by: planet doomed on Jun 25, 2007 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost every newspaper account I read mentioned that this man raped a second girl who was passed out drunk, and that there was video of this rape. Because we live in a society where men constantly make excuses for other men who rape, this dirtbag was acquited of that charge.

By prosecuting him for statutory rape of a different girl, the proscutors were attempting to at least get him busted for something that a male jury would have to convict.

But the misogynist authors of this article do not mention any of this. Why not? Because they like the idea of men getting away with rape, and they want you to believe that most rape convictions are bogus.

What other logical reason is there?


#1 The conviction rate for rape is 5%. (Dept of Justice)

#2 A rape trial always come down to he said/she said. She says it was rape; he says it was consentual.

#3 So you either believe the man or the woman; only two choices. 50/50 chance of who you choose to believe.

#4 Realistically, we should expect the woman to be believed HALF the time.

#5 But women are believed only 5% of the time. The man is believed 95% of the time.

LADIES!! THAT IS NOT LOVE, PROTECTION OR CONCERN! DROP THE BLINDERS! THEY HATE US!

Share a house with a friend, get a dildo, do whatever you have to do -- but drop the people who only pretend to care, all the while they are continuing the institutionalized abuse. Tolerating a group of jerks who have proved over and over again that they truly don't care about our welfare is what masochists do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We have the opposite problem in the UK
Posted by: Cruella on Jun 25, 2007 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» I'm curious as to.. Posted by: ekipnrut
» RE: I'm curious as to.. Posted by: mike_lee
» RE: I'm curious as to.. Posted by: ekipnrut
» My apologies Posted by: mike_lee
BOND HEARING COMING UP...There is an obvious question with this
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jun 25, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new development..Why can't AG Baker authorize bail being set
---in spite of the local DA---when it gets right down to it ???
He (Baker) is pursuing the State's appeal , he states he has no objection to bail and the AG is the chief legal officer of the State of Georgia..any Georgia lawyers out there???
Group offers $1 million for Genarlow Wilson's bond
By JEREMY REDMON Published on: 06/25/07
A New York City investment fund manager and 10 other businesspeople are offering to put up $1 million in bond money to release Genarlow Wilson from prison pending the appeal in his child molestation case, Wilson's attorney announced this afternoon. Whitney Tilson, the founder of T2 Partners and the Tilson Mutual Funds, and the 10 other unnamed contributors are ready to wire the money on Wilson's behalf on 24 hours notice, said Wilson's attorney, B.J. Bernstein.
"The goal of this bond is to help a young man in Georgia get his life back," Tilson, also a founding member of Teach for America, said in a prepared statement Bernstein's office distributed today. Tilson is out of the country today and could not be immediately reached for comment. But an aide close to him confirmed his commitment to Wilson.
Bernstein is trying to free Wilson pending an appeal in his case that is now before the Georgia Supreme Court. Wilson was sentenced to 10 years in prison for receiving oral sex from a 15-year-old girl when he was 17. The age of consent in Georgia is 16. A bond hearing has been set for July 5. At that hearing, Douglas County Superior Court Judge David T. Emerson will consider whether Wilson should be granted bond based on several criteria, including his risk of fleeing and his ties to the community. Wilson's attorneys say that hearing would not be necessary if Douglas County District Attorney David McDade, whose office originally prosecuted Wilson, would agree to bond for Wilson.
"Why wait for July 5," Bernstein wrote McDade today.
"Genarlow has no prior offenses, made all previous court appearances, and is not at risk of flight since he has significant ties to the community. His case deserves a signature only bond or a reasonable bond in the amount of $25,000."
McDade did not immediately respond to a request for comment today. He has previously said that he was undecided about whether he would support or oppose bond for Wilson.
Meanwhile, Attorney General Thurbert Baker is appealing a decision in Wilson's case to the Georgia Supreme Court. In his appeal, Baker says a Monroe County Superior Court judge overstepped his authority by reducing Wilson's felony conviction to a misdemeanor and ordering him freed from prison. Baker, however, has said he does not oppose bond for Wilson pending the appeal.
Wilson's case stems from a 2003 New Year's Eve party at a Douglasville hotel. He was originally charged with raping a 17-year-old at the party, but he was acquitted. He was ultimately found guilty of aggravated child molestation involving the 15-year-old girl, a felony that carried a minimum 10-year prison sentence under the law at the time. The age of consent in Georgia is 16. A friend captured their party on a videotape that became key evidence in the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can You Believe This?
Posted by: dlf on Jun 26, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The young lady didn't want to press charges. I don't know how the video of her performing the sex act on this young man got into the DA's hands but, he brought charges even though the young woman admitted she started the act. And here is the kicker if he had had sex with her, it would have been a misdeameanor. Also in the next court room was a teacher who had sex with a student who was sentenced to 90 days! Only in America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement