Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Nominates Surgeon General Who Supports 'Ex-Gay' Therapy

By Max Blumenthal, Huffington Post. Posted June 12, 2007.


The concept of "ex-gay" therapy, repudiated by the medical world, will be thoroughly examined when Bush's new surgeon general nominee comes up for confirmation.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Max Blumenthal

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

James Holsinger, President George W. Bush's nominee for Surgeon General, has a dark view of homosexuals. In a 1991 paper, Holsinger describes homosexual sex in sickeningly lurid language. "Fist fornication," "sphincter injuries," "lacerations," "perforations" and "deaths seen in connection with anal eroticism," are some of the terms Holsinger concocted to describe acts with which he suggests at least medical familiarity (a case of participant observation, perhaps?). At the same paper, Holsinger puzzlingly issues no warnings about the dangers of heterosexual sex in his paper. To him, only "anal eroticism" is a health peril.

Holsinger's allies -- those who lobbied the White House for his nomination -- include James Dobson's Focus on the Family and the Heritage Foundation. They have predictably cast his confirmation battle as a religious test, alleging that his homophobia is a reflection of orthodox Christian views. To oppose Holsinger on the grounds of his anti-gay sentiments, the right says, is to discriminate against him simply for being a bible-believing Christian. Why should he have to check his Christianity at the church exit door? they ask. This worn-out appeal to the Christian right's victimhood complex distracts from the most salient argument against Holsinger's confirmation -- which is exactly what it is intended to do.

For a moment let's put aside the moral case against Holsinger's confirmation, and objectively examine his qualifications for America's top doctor. Holsinger and his wife were founders of Hope Springs Community Church. This church, according to its pastor, Rev. David Calhoun, has an "ex-gay" ministry that administers "reparative therapy" to people who no longer wish to be gay. "We see that as an issue not of orientation but a lifestyle," Calhoun says. "We have people who seek to walk out of that lifestyle."

Holsinger believes in ex-gay therapy. He therefore views homosexuality as a curable disease. Every major, reputable medical organization rejects ex-gay therapy and the notion that homosexuality constitutes a mental illness. Every single one. The most notable of these organizations is the American Psychological Association, the country's largest organization of mental health professionals. In 1974, the APA stopped listing homosexuality as a mental disorder; last year, the group issued a pointed repudiation to the ideological proponents of ex-gay therapy. (It's worth adding that conversion therapy supporters have not produced one single word of peer-reviewed work to support their theories).

Holsinger's belief in discredited, crack-pot "conversion" therapy puts him in direct conflict with virtually the entire American medical community. Holsinger can believe in radical evangelical doctrine and he can hold bigoted views. As lamentable as these traits are, they don't necessarily disqualify him for Surgeon General -- though they certainly cast a dark shadow over his nomination. What instantly disqualifies Holsinger is his rejection of medical science. He can be politically incorrect, but he can't be medically incorrect.

If history is any guide, conservatism and respect for science are not mutually exclusive. Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop, the co-author of a strident anti-abortion tract with evangelical dominionist godfather Francis Schaeffer, respected science. In the face of massive resistance from right-wing activists, Koop used his prestige to advocate for sex education and condom use to stanch the rising epidemic of AIDS. For Koop's stand on medical principle, his one-time allies pressured Reagan into forcing him to resign. There is no indication Holsinger will follow Koop's principled path.

When Holsinger goes before the Senate, ex-gay therapy goes on trial. He and his Republican supporters should be compelled to state their views on homosexuality and the crackpot practice the Christian right employs to "cure" people of it. Is homosexuality a treatable disease and how do they know it? (This question should be asked of GOP presidential contenders as well). If and when Holsinger's nomination goes down in flames, ex-gay therapy will have received its most decisive repudiation yet.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: homophobia, surgeon general, ex-gay therapy

Max Blumenthal is a Puffin Foundation writing fellow at the Nation Institute based in Washington, DC. Read his blog at maxblumenthal.blogspot.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When "straight" men are more fascinated by gay esoterica than we are
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jun 12, 2007 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that tells more about them than about us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ah Repugwicans, the keepers of values and other NAZI characteristics
Posted by: james2021 on Jun 12, 2007 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strange fascination this person has with Anal eroticism. Strange that he doesnt extend it to Heterosexual sex. But then again, he is a Good Evangelical, and the same damage done to WOMEN doesn't count.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dr. Holsinger's nomination.
Posted by: Willy on Jun 12, 2007 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What really alarms me is that a lot of Americans agree with Dr. Holsinger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But He Tows BigPharma's Line
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 12, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From what I understand, his central issue is going to be childhood obesity, so the power that be love him despite his wacky views on homosexuality. Scaring parents to death over their kids weight will increase the profits of major weight loss companies. He takes care of the kids, while on the other side Hillary wants to go after obese senior women. (Actually obesity is protective in senior women!) But no age group can escape. Not to mention, this panic over childhood obesity creates a distraction so people have less time to worry about the war, their civil rights eroding, peak oil, the bees disappearing, global warming, and hundreds of other more pressing crises. Of course if they really cared about childhood obesity, they might start looking at growth hormones, endocrine disrupters and the fact that mom's dieting even before pregnancy can cause fatter children. But that won't make parents feel as guilty, and a guilty population is easier to manipulate. Science has been a joke in the Bush administration. Why would anyone expect any Bush crony to be anything other than a patsy out to help the rich bilk more money out of the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is Bush trying to impress with this?
Posted by: doctorsquared on Jun 12, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's the lamest of lame ducks and the presidential candidates from his own party are distancing themselves from him. Why doesn't he just nominate some nobody moderate who would fly right through the confirmation hearings under the radar? Oh, wait...I was just incorrectly suggesting that W has the capacity to assess his political fortunes and act on reason...what was I thinking?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Should religious beliefs be allowed for anyone holding this post?
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Jun 12, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it about time that the Senate make the right decision regarding the appointment of any candidate who puts his own religious beliefs as head of the office of Surgeon General before the rights of all Americans that this office is suppose to serve. Vote no on James Holsinger!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

and the point is...?
Posted by: dover23 on Jun 12, 2007 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who cares about the twisted ideologies of this guy, the Heritage foundation and such, doesn't deserve the pleasures of gay sex. What's the issue? Sodomy is already illegal, and any curious young man stupid enough to abstain because of what this wacko says is probably not much fun and worth picking up anyway. If anything, if the surgeon general is preaching ex-gay therapy, it would make gay sex hotter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: and the point is...? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Pathetic Choice For US Surgeon General
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 12, 2007 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being Surgeon General is hazardous to your health especially if you DARE to speak scientifically instead of in lockstep with the right wing "moralists" in political power. From Reagan to "HW" to "W".

There are many fine surgeon generals who got fired or "resigned" recently including Dr. C. Everette Koop who was himself a fundamentalist BUT who separated that from his role as Surgeon General

How pathetic that this Doctor's name was put forth as our new US Surgeon General

We are hitting bottom real fast

Dr. Rick Lippin
http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm counting on Barbara, but Diane....
Posted by: DaBear on Jun 12, 2007 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure Dianne Feinstein will pull out her usual, 'well, the President ought to have who he wants...' and then we all wonder why the Republikaaner-asshats are still on their winning streak despite the fact the entire planet hates us now and 88% of the U.S. public wants these crooks in jail.

"Anal Eroticism," OMG I'm LMAOROTF! What an asswhole!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fascinating concept, this "ex-gay" therapy
Posted by: Alec Freeman on Jun 13, 2007 3:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea of "ex-gay" therapy is absurd of course, and Bush's Surgeon General pick is certainly no surpise. Aside from this outrage, I wonder: What exactly goes on during an ex-gay therapy session? I'm fascinated with this. Does anyone have any information? I can only imagine what goes on. Is the client (or patient?) shown pictures of Marky Mark or gay porn and then shocked, slapped, or rebuked? Does Britney Spears come in and expose her breasts? What kind of attitude does the "therapist" display towards the client? How is the "progression" from homosexuality to heterosexuality measured and monitored? Is this "therapy" generally conducted with gay males, or lesbians as well? I'd be very interested to sit in on one of these sessions; it must be somewhat bizarre, yes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Behavior modification works Posted by: mercury613
Holsinger: a highly qualified and excellent choice for surgeon general
Posted by: rileycase on Jun 13, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I happen to know Jim Holsinger which means I am aware that he is highly qualified both as a physician and administrator and as one with insight and legitimate concerns about the health of the nation. The bloggers writing against Holsinger are obsessed with the fact that he holds a traditional Christian view on homosexuality. To this crowd anyone who disagrees with their own views on George Bush or on homosexuality or Christianity is to be rejected at all costs. These people are scary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wonder
Posted by: pdeep on Jun 13, 2007 1:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if the ex-gay therapy worked on George Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Holsinger believes in ex-gay therapy."
Posted by: YogiBear on Jun 13, 2007 9:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a moron!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ex-Hypocrites
Posted by: mercury613 on Jun 14, 2007 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find it hilarious how the "faithful" always interpret the bible to best suit their own interests. The new testament contains very few, vague reference to homosexuality that nearly all fundamentalist "christians" interpret to mean that homosexuality is a sin. Period. End of story. No discussion. Those same "christians", however, conveniently overlook the fact that Jesus' denouncement of hypocrisy and wealth is a running theme throughout their bible.

I wonder if the new surgeon general will start ministries that administer reparative therapy to ex-hypocrites and the ex-wealthy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]