Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Imagine How the Media Would Cover the Divorced Rich Republican Presidential Candidates, If They Were Democrats

By Jamison Foser, Media Matters for America. Posted June 4, 2007.


McCain names his pets after fashion accesories, Giuliani loves the opera, and Romney sees himself as qualified for a top CEO job -- the top GOP presidential field is loaded with unabashed high rollers.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jamison Foser

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Imagine how the media would react if a multimillionaire, East Coast, big-city, thrice-married presidential candidate who was a progressive Democrat said his most recent music purchase was opera, his favorite fitness activity, golf, and added that he doesn't drive -- he navigates.

Or if a progressive Democratic candidate who had launched his political career by marrying into a wealthy and politically connected family, and then promptly ran for Congress, revealed that he has pet turtles named "Cuff" and "Link."

Or if a progressive Democratic candidate who was the son of a governor, who has a net worth of around $200 million, whose own campaign staff was concerned he is seen as not tough enough and that his hair looks too perfect ... imagine if such a candidate said that if he weren't running for office, he'd probably be chief executive of an auto company and that his staff boasted that the difference between him and the president is "intelligence."

The media would have an absolute field day, yammering endlessly about how the candidate is too "soft" and is an elitist, an arrogant know-it-all with a misguided sense of entitlement who is hopelessly out of touch with the rugged regular-folk who live in Michigan and enjoy NASCAR and country music and drive pickups. There would be a real danger of Chris Matthews literally exploding on live television, unable to contain his incredulity that such a clueless candidate could possibly think a Pennsylvania steelworker would care what he has to say. (Then, with the Klieg lights turned off, Matthews would head off to one of the glitzy balls that he frequents, maintaining his place on Washington Life's "Social List" -- or perhaps he'd take a quick trip to relax by the pool of his vacation home nestled among the dunes of Nantucket. Railing against cultural elites on behalf of the Working Man is tiring, after all.)

But when the three leading (for now) Republican presidential candidates reveal their fondness for opera (Giuliani), have their pets named after fashion accessories (McCain), and boast that if they weren't running for president, they'd probably be running an auto company (Romney), it passes without notice.

So when longtime lobbyist and Hollywood actor Fred Thompson -- a man who once rented a red pickup truck in order to campaign in Tennessee as a man of the people -- indicated this week that he would seek the Republican presidential nomination, we knew how the media would describe him: Authentic. Folksy.

Let's back up a moment: Thompson didn't evendrive the rented pickup, as The Washington Monthly reported in 1996:

Finishinghis talk, Thompson shakes a few hands, then walks out with the rest of the crowd to the red pickup truck he made famous during his 1994 Senate campaign. My friend stands talking with her colleagues as the senator is driven away by a blond, all-American staffer. A few minutes later, my friend gets into her car to head home. As she pulls up to the stop sign at the parking lot exit, rolling up to the intersection is Senator Thompson, now behind the wheel of a sweet silver luxury sedan. He gives my friend a slight nod as he drives past. Turning onto the main road, my friend passes the school's small, side parking area. Lo and behold: There sits the abandoned red pickup, along with the all-American staffer.

The pickup was, literally, a rented prop designed to help a wealthy actor/Washington lobbyist/trial lawyer play the role of salt-of-the-earth populist.

But Chris Matthews and the Beltway pundit crowd don't encounter many actual working-class voters as they stroll the dunes of Nantucket. A wealthy lobbyist/actor who rents a red pickup truck to play the role of a regular guy strikes them as "authentic" and "folksy." Mark Halperin wrote this week that Thompson won his first Senate race "after driving his trademark red pickup truck all over Tennessee."

It wasn't "his" and he

didn't "drive" it, of course, but the illusion of authenticity is all that matters to the pundit class. Thus a wealthy lobbyist in a rented pickup is folksy and authentic. (A Nexis search for "Fred Thompson and (Thompson w/20 folksy)" returns 40 hits since January 1. Several mention the red pickup; only Wonkette bothered to mention it was rented. The Washington Post assured readers that "[t]he signature red pickup truck from Thompson's Senate campaigns will be dusted off.")


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, gop, presidential candidates

Jamison Foser is Managing Director at Media Matters for America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Media whores
Posted by: Glennk1949 on Jun 4, 2007 3:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The MSM will do its best to destroy any Demo. candidate thatis progressive in any fashion that looks like he can beat a Rethug. Thats because the MSM is owned by huge Corps. that are owned and run by rich conservative rethugs. Their bias is obvious and annoying but what can u do about it? Thats why so many people now get their news and commentary here on the Internet. But , most still get it from guys like Blitzer and Matthews who are themselves fabulously wealthy TV news stars. In the end though it won't matter. Even if a Dem. gets elected nothing much will change anymore. Thats because the Dem. party is just for the most part now made up of what we used too be called Moderate Rethugs. There is no party for the average person anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who is Rich
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Jun 4, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Repubs are rich but dems arent??????? Hiliary, Edwards, Pelosi.. I'd say they are pretty much neck and neck with the repubs.. As for the media..we all know it's liberal biased and takes any chance at bashing a conservative.. so who know's there the authors head is regarding media "doesn't give a dem/liberal a fair shake".. it's the whole reason Fox news does so well.. it's the only conservative biased station around!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» bigtime Posted by: pnut
» RE: Who is Rich Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: Who is Rich Posted by: Conservasaurus
» Divided this country? Posted by: Ellie1
» RE: Who is Rich Posted by: NWCrow
The Republican field
Posted by: robchapman on Jun 4, 2007 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Mormon, Mitt Romney has often quipped that his view on marriage is that it is contract between a man and a woman and a woman and a woman.

With Gingrich, Giuliani and McCain also in the race for the GOP nomination Romney is merely describing his opponents.

The candidates for the nomination are the best statement on Family values a la the GOP.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Republican field Posted by: solrev
» Heh... Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Heh... Posted by: YogiBear
Just consider Michael Douglas
Posted by: LouisFallert on Jun 4, 2007 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you imagine how the media would treat the case of a Democratic first lady or potential first lady who was responsible for the death of a classmate in high school, as Laura Bush was?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Uhhhh...
Posted by: Sweeet Pea on Jun 4, 2007 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cuff & Link are a nod to Rocky Balboa & his turtles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Uhhhh... Posted by: cwragg
» RE: Uhhhh... Posted by: Sweeet Pea
» RE: Uhhhh... Posted by: NWCrow
From where I sit it's rich vs. not-rich
Posted by: rancespergl on Jun 4, 2007 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's get real and speak plainly.

The greater the detail the clearer it is.

There is no real difference between corporate Democrats or Republicans. Nothing of substance is ever resolved. Toothless laws, useless laws, empty mandates. The only sound that's heard is the background murmur of pockets being filled.

This is all about the divide between the haves and the have-nots.

Wake up, America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternate Reality
Posted by: vritchey on Jun 4, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would love to live in an Alternate Reality where all the crimes and this war were started by a Democrat and exactly what the Republicans would be saying about a President who can never admit they were wrong, that got us into a war using lies and continues his "stay the course" no matter what the people would want, abuses the Constitution and hires nothing but cronies that support his policy into his administration, including the Generals!

I believe the "Liberal Media" would be having a hayday by now. If a Republican Congress can try to impeach a President over an adulterous affair - imagine what they would have done in this Alternate Reality?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which rich person will be selected President? If history says
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jun 4, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anything it will likely be the Republican that will be selected by the bankers and large corporate, internationalist interests in the next Presidential election. This is only because they have selected the rich Democrats to be the majority in both houses and the cartel who selects the candidates is always careful to maintain the facade that there are meaningful elections and that 'your vote matters'. They could select a rich Democrat to become President but if they do so they would like swing one of the Houses back to the rick Republican majority. Although their agenda is clear the most important thing for the cartel currently is to reinforce the misguided idea that the USA is still a republican democracy that represents the people of the USA and that there are actually differences between the allowed two parties. A choice between two items, both of which have the same values/ideas and both of which get their money from the same interests, is not a choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting... how do they do that? Posted by: albrechtkrausse
At least McCain HAS pets...
Posted by: SekhmetsatRa on Jun 4, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unlike giuliani, whose wife is a puppy-killer. And yes, i WILL point this out every single time i see his name mentioned. Do YOU want a puppy-killer as first lady? i don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MOST repukes are murderers Posted by: Ellie1
This is how news is reported when press and govt have same owners
Posted by: LMNOP on Jun 4, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK. The right owns and controls the media, and is intensely biased toward Republicans. This is well established, and old news, and this article simply provides another illustration of that truth.

This, combined with rigged elections, the absence of any opposition party, and rigged elections are what makes this a dictatorship, even if it doesn't resemble dictatorships like Hitler's that had troops on the streets controlling citizens. Surveillance and intimidation are done in newer ways, now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, ANY CANDIDATE'S DREAM
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jun 4, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will we stop getting all bogged down in gossip? That's all it is. Campaigning should be limited to 90 days and to important things. QUESTIONS FROM US not TV personalities. Any candidate unwilling or unable to provide us answers is out of the race. Electing our president is not a television series it's serious stuff. It shouldn't be another form of entertaiment. And that's all it is. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heads out of our butts
Posted by: PaulM on Jun 4, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Seriously. Both the Dems and the Republicans are picked by the corporate oligarchy, which also controls the majority of the media. We've got to stop pretending to be surprised about this stuff and actually get out and do something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Heads out of our butts Posted by: freethink7
'Giuliani loves the opera...'
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Jun 4, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love the opera, too. One of my favorites is Il Prosciutto, one of Giuseppe Verde's lesser know works, about a dictator who makes the subways run on time while attending masked balls in drag. I don't know why they haven't brought it out on CD yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What a ham. N/M Posted by: fork
While Americans Have Been Distracted With Guilliani, Romney, Paris Hilton et al
Posted by: freethink7 on Jun 4, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and have an otherwise inordinate preoccupation with "trashy news" + "gossip", mainstream media has ignored these newsworthy items:

More Innocent Americans/Iraqi's Die in Unethetical Iraq War
Veterans Demand Investigation into USS Liberty Attack
Plans to Keep our Troops in Iraq beyond 2009
Plame Vows to Battle CIA Over Free Speech
Bu$h Continues to Ignore Israel Occupation/Aggression in Palestine
Israel Aided Entebbe Attack
Arkansas GOP Chair Says America Needs New (9/11 style) Attack on American Soil

I agree with Paul's post above......get your heads out of your a*# and stop being aquiescent to trashy gossip/news.

All news stories above are 'google-able'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The corporate propaganda system...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 4, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is not some kind of massive underground-headquarters conspiracy. It's not a cabal of wealthy bankers who meet in the dead of night in upstate New York mansions.

Rather, it is the result of years of self-censorship by ambitious reporters and editors who have internalized the values of the corporate elite as a necessary step in their own material advancement.

Reporters know who gets promotions and who gets shunted off into the dustbin. They look at the records of the media editors and media executives who control what gets printed, and they quickly realize that the route to success is the path of least resistance.

In this case, ambitious reporters and editors know that the executives like stories that portray Republican and corporate Democratic candidates in a flattering light, and that they also like articles which ridicule Kucinich, for example.

Also, as in any professional field, there is a tradition of not openly attacking one's colleagues for their gutless pandering to their bosses. Reporters who do actively buck the system (think: Gary Webb's articles on the Iran-Contra-Cocaine scandal) are consigned to oblivion - they are blacklisted and prevented from every working for the corporate media, period.

This is the way the world ends - not with a bang, but with a whimper. At least there's the Internet... which is the greatest threat to the corporate media that exists, which is why the telecom corporations are fighting to end net neutrality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is true, but ...
Posted by: kelt65 on Jun 6, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats are the ones pandering to the lower / working class, so it is a point of hypocrisy for them. Republipukes admire filthy rich corporate thieves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]