Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

CEOs vs. Slaves

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted May 31, 2007.


Recent findings shed new light on the increasingly unequal terrain of American society. The new "top" involves pay in the hundreds of millions, a private jet and a few acres of Nantucket. The new bottom is slavery.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Barbara Ehrenreich

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Recent findings shed new light on the increasingly unequal terrain of American society. Starting at the top executive level: You may have thought, as I did, that the guys in the C-suites operated as a team -- or, depending on your point of view, a pack or gang -- each getting his fair share of the take. But no, the rising tide in executive pay does not lift all yachts equally. The latest pay gap to worry about is the one between the CEO and his -- or very rarely her -- third in command.

According to a just-reported study by Carola Frydman of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Raven E. Saks at the Federal Reserve, 30-40 years ago, the CEO's of major companies earned 80 percent more, on average, than the third-highest-paid executives. By the early part of the 21st century, however, the gap CEO and the third in command had ballooned up to 260 percent.

Now take a look at what's happening at the very bottom of the economic spectrum, where you might have pictured low-wage workers trudging between food banks or mendicants dwelling in cardboard boxes. It turns out, though, that the bottom is a lot lower than that.

On May 16, a millionaire couple in a woodsy Long Island suburb was charged with keeping two Indonesian domestics as slaves for five years, during which the women were paid $100 a month, fed very little, forced to sleep on mats on the floor, and subjected to beatings, cigarette burns and other torments.

This is hardly an isolated case (see my book, Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy, co-edited with Arlie Hochschild.) If the new "top" involves pay in the tens or hundreds of millions, a private jet and a few acres of Nantucket, the new bottom is slavery.

Some of America's slaves are captive domestics, like the Indonesian women in Long Island. Others are factory workers, and at least 10,000 are sex slaves lured from their home country to American brothels by promises of respectable jobs. CEOs and slaves: these are the extreme ends of American class polarization.

But a parallel kind of splitting is going in many of the professions. Top-ranked college professors, for example, enjoy salaries of several hundred thousand a year, often augmented by consulting fees and earnings from their patents or biotech companies. At the other end of the professoriate, you have adjunct teachers toiling away for about $5000 a semester or less, with no benefits or chance of tenure. There was a story a few years ago about an adjunct who commuted to his classes from a homeless shelter in Manhattan, and adjuncts who moonlight as waitresses or cleaning ladies are legion.

Similarly, the legal profession, which is topped by law firm partners billing hundred of dollars an hour, now has a new proletariat of temp lawyers working for $19-25 an hour in sweatshop conditions. On sites like http://temporaryattorney.blogspot.com/, temp lawyers report working 12 hours a day, six days a week, in crowded basements with inadequate sanitary facilities. According to an article in American Lawyer, a legal temp at a major New York firm reports being "corralled in a windowless basement room littered with dead cockroaches," where six out of seven exits were blocked.

Contemplating the violent and increasing polarization of American society, one cannot help but think of "dark energy," the mysterious force that is propelling the galaxies apart from each other one at a speed far greater than can be accounted for by the energy of the original big bang. Cosmic bodies seem to be repelling each other, much as a CEO must look down at his CFO, COO, etc. and think, "They're getting too close. I've got to make more, more, more!"

The difference is that the galaxies don't need each other, and are free to go their separate ways nonchalantly. But the CEO presumably depends on his fellow executives, just as the star professor relies on adjuncts to do his or her teaching and the law firm partner is enriched by the sweated labor of legal temps. For all we know, some of those CEOs go home to sip their single malts in mahogany walled dens that have been cleaned by domestic slaves.

Why is it so hard for the people at the top to graciously acknowledge their dependency on the labor of others? We need some sort of gravitational force to counter the explosive distancing brought about by greed -- before our economy imitates the universe and blows itself to smithereens.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: wage gap, ceo, slave labor

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Worth
Posted by: edith on May 31, 2007 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one is "worth" millions of dollars per year in salary and perqs, including stock options. That's the compensation, I imagine, that the top managers referred to here, make, however. But why? The answer is in the worth of the company. As stock rises, so does the willingness of boards of directors and major shareholders to pay ridiculous compensations to one or two individuals, though as Ehrenreich correctly points out, many are responsible for the success of the few.

The authoritarian nature of the larger US corporations is evident by the distorted pay scales skewed to benefit several individuals at the top of companies that employ thousands. The man at the top is responsible for all of the success, and all of the failure. It's an irony at how simplistic a view the market and market makers hold of what it takes for a corporation to succeed. Just change the guy at the top and all will be well.

If the purpose of the company is to appreciate (inflate) its stock, then the quality of its products and the fair compensation of all its employees are afterthoughts.

After all, what are the lower scale managers and employees going to do? Strike? Ha Ha. Not in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Failure? Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Worth Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Worth Posted by: Blix
» RE: Worth Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Worth Posted by: Blix
» RE: Worth Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Huh? Posted by: EagleMB
» Huh?Smokin huh Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Worth Posted by: DinTN
» RE: Worth Posted by: CatDad
» You left someone out... Posted by: SteveB
» RE: Worth Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: Worth Posted by: lessbread
» RE: Even More Ironic Posted by: Lincoln fan
What now Edith,
Posted by: richholland on May 31, 2007 2:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so you donot follow the capitalisme blindfolded Edith.
If you are a communists you have to follow the Party number 1, if you love the capitalisme you should accept that some are very rich and many poor. Because that is the result of capitalisme as proved by the filosopher KARL MARX in 1848(Das Kapital)

In Europe we have the Socialkapitalisme what means that every worker has one month holiday, medical insurance etc.
Once our Prime Minister (a billionaire) said that the comparison between minimum net income 1; to a top salary should not exceed 5.
So if the minimum in holland is about$ 1000, a maximum should be netto about 5000. per month.
In reality we are going the American way in future Europa..But as you mentioned before; Left doesnot mean always progressif and Right doesnot allways mean conservatif.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Marx... Posted by: channing
Sociopaths at the top
Posted by: DZ on May 31, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sociopaths lack a conscience, and crave stimulation as they do not have many of the rewards of living that others have due to their affliction. Roughly 3-4% of the US population -- the majority male -- are sociopathic. Is it not reasonable to assume that the more capable of those will rise to the top over the "bodies" of their more conscience-driven competition?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the partnership of DOMINATION
Posted by: unity1 on May 31, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What this all points to is a partnership and Raine Eslier has been talking about that for many years in her large body of work - we could never have got this far without being in some sort of relationship with each other - this one however is violent and controlling dominanting via fear and the fear of death/force - but it is a partnership desipite it all - just a disfunctional one

The obsenity of such amounts of money contrast with another event existing simultaneously in time - the deaths of millions of people in the middle east - extreme wealth and extreme destruction - nothing exists in a vacum

how come it keeps going on year after year -

we know by now that corporations have the personality of a psychopath - what we don't really want to admit is how enslaved we really are
how shallow our freedoms

the world is facing multipile crisis, looming - and yet it does nothing much - having NORMALISED all its warning signs - it fails to comprehend the challenges facing it

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anti-Capitalism in 5 Minutes or Less
Posted by: frosty86 on May 31, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's an excellent summary of the problems with capitalism by Robert Jensen

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/04/30/865/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Am not... Posted by: dover23
» anti-capitalism review Posted by: frosty86
» Were screwed Posted by: Krain61
Stop whining
Posted by: PJT on May 31, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The top paid executives' salaries are set by board comp committees, approved by shareholders. Whether or not they are "worth it" is irrelevant. It is like saying a professional athlete "isn't worth $20 million". I say, YOU throw the ball 98 miles an hour. YOU lead the company that makes $20 billion profit. Same for the poor adjuncts. My Son, the Genius, will graduate from the University of Chicago next week with honors. He is an English major. He could get a reasonably paying job; he could go to grad school and try to become an English professor. If he does he is NOT likely to win the lottery and wind up in a tenure-track position at a major university. It is more likely he will have three adjunct jobs and no benefits. Guess what: that's HIS PROBLEM. He could be using his English degree for profit in myriad ways. Suck it up. One reason to get to the top of the heap is it is easier to stomp on the fingers of the losers trying to get up there too. If you want "equality" move to a civilized country. PJT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Stop whining Posted by: Krotos
» RE: Stop whining Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Stop whining Posted by: Logic's Edge
» Wow. Posted by: supercrisp
» RE: Stop whining Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Stop whining Posted by: Krain61
Let's face it...
Posted by: JohnnyM on May 31, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The failure of western society is the so-called "free-market."

We have executives egos getting paid way too much, Enron-like scandals, growing poverty, firms on wall street owning companies by-the-numbers only(w/o a care for the employees lives), etc.

Raising monies without the free market would be difficult, and to make it a law to have to make a profit for your shareholders is ridiculous (it is their excuse for many atrocities). And then to say 'hey, my plan made this company $100Billion so I deserve at least $100M, while fair and reasonable sounding, only makes sense if everyone who executed the plan also has at least an 8-figure salary.

Who in the company executes the strategy? The middle management. It's as if society believes that formulating a strategy is 100 times more important than executing it, which of course is wrong! In fact, the complete opposite might be true.

It is pure ego and greed that justifies these salaries in their minds, if they do at all.

This is our failure. Democracy is what makes the west the best, not the free-market.

So Mr/Mrs CEO, don't tell me life isn't fair or it's human nature or it's a dog-eat-dog world, because these things are only true in your mind, and there's enough food, water, money for everyone. It is you who doesn't like to share. It is you who is the hoarder. Poverty should have been beaten 20 years ago or more, but it is you who have disallowed this to happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's face it... Posted by: marid
Slavery For Most: Capitalism's Destiny
Posted by: malcolmartin on May 31, 2007 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no turning back now! Unchecked by a revolutionary struggle based on the idea of sharing the world’s resources, capitalism will by its very nature will turn the world into a giant slave labor camp. This economic system’s appetite for profit simply cannot be satisfied! Take for example the U.S. oil industry and its world record profit taking in 2004. Last year as they raised domestic gasoline prices up to and beyond $3.00/gallon that record was shattered. The U.S. oil companies listed on Standard & Poor’s index reported an astounding $95.6 billion in profits for 2005! Trouble is, as will be proven this summer, unless ExxonMobile, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and the rest make even greater profit into the indefinite future they will whither and die as General Motors and Ford are now doing in the face of competition with Toyota, Honda and Nissan. That is why even this obscenely profitable industry had to be sheltered from the windfall profits tax and must have the billions in royalty relief they will soon get from their servants in the U.S. government.

But even these corporate welfare measures only delay the inevitable. There is only so much technology can boost production or wages can be depressed until a slave system must be created to increase profits. Even at that, the system will then stare into the eyes of its fatal contradiction. Slaves cannot buy the products they produce.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You all sound like whining children
Posted by: White middleclass male on May 31, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Thats not fair. Why does Billy get a new bike and I don't”. That is what you sound like to me. Guess what folks life is not fair. The best piece of advice I ever got was from my father who said: “ No one is going to come along and give you anything because your [my name], you have to earn[take] it.”

My advice to you get ahead any way possible. Lie, cheat , steal, manipulate, fuck the boss and film it if that is what it takes. But please stop your god damn bitching.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Lie, cheat , steal, manipulate..." Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» This is my affirmative action Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: This is my affirmative action Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» How observant you idiot Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: This is my affirmative action Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: You all sound like whining children Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» Hmmm. Posted by: supercrisp
» sarcastic or earnest.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» WMM's saddest comment yet... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» You R A ASSHOLE Posted by: Krain61
asking for it?
Posted by: paschn on May 31, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't go so far as to say we deserve it, but we're sure as hell asking for it.
This is obvious when you look at the millions of middle/lower class idiots that support the Republican "gang". The core of which are, (for the most part), the spawn of the maggots that worked us 12 to 14 hours a day 7 days a week, made fortunes working along side our "enemies", ( Prescot Bush, Coca Cola,[ ever hear of Fanta ], and other "patriotic U.S. corporations), they used their "pocket politicians then as now to manipulate us all and rape the environment and we basically thank 'em for it. Hell, look at the billions we give the terrorist nation of Israel, as a thankyou for murdering our service men,( USS Liberty), spying on us and possibly false flagging us into wars we never should have fought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: asking for it? Posted by: Lincoln fan
It Don't Work That Way
Posted by: NumberSix on May 31, 2007 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with most of these "free market" economic models is that they fail miserably to take into account the eventual reality that comes when their "support system" collapses and disintegration takes place.

The problem, as I always saw it, is that too many economists don't study load kinetics, structure, weight and balance. One asks, "Can we really interpret an economic system using similar laws as we do mechanical systems?" I say, yes, and history agrees with such a methodology.

Hence, the so-called "free market" is much akin to building a pyramid: We must keep in mind weight distribution. The base of the structure must be wide enough, and strong enough to maintain the structuring above. Each layer below must then contain it's own weight, and the weight of the above. Layer by layer, until we get to the base, and the base had better be able to support mass in millions of tons PSI.

Can we say this is true of economic systems? By far.

To be wealthy, there must be a supportive financial system below, with each layer generating a kind of financial "mass containment" for each. Each layer then supports all the layers above and so on.

Ah! So, with both, what happens if the supporting structures cannot contain the load mass from above? With a building, we then haul out chaos math, and apply the avalanche kinetic. At a point, the whole sucker collapses.

Worse, suppose we keep adding more and more to the upper portions, but without adding more superstructure below? Again, avalanche kicks in: Bang, boom and look out below!

And?

What I am seeing is a middle class fading away, becoming more and more poor. This robs the economic superstructure of the ability to maintain the mass of those who are wealthy. Eventually, a collapse goes off, and everyone on top rides chaotically to the dirt below.

Sadly, there aren't precise engineering methods to predict when an economic structure implodes, but, we can, yes, from history, see that when this happens, the end is eventual, and no amount of goddamned whining.....can stop it.

The neo-cons, and the cultists of greed say this cannot happen. I offer world history as argument: Every time in our past, when the wealthy become too wealthy, and the supporing economic structure under them gives away....the results are total economic catastrophe.

It would, then, make sense to reshuffle some things, build a very strong economic system to repair the middle class, to broaden the economic base so to speak, but that does not appear to be going to happen.

The end result? A worldwide depression the likes mankind has not seen. Revolt will take place in more places than our little armies can contain. It will happen.

And no, it ain't communism, socialism or whatever. It's just pure, simple engineering: We cannot build a system with infinite wealth without also building a structure that can maintain it. Otherwise? Don't call me when the avalanche hits.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pyramids Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: It Don't Work That Way Posted by: Wastedaka
» RE: It Don't Work That Way Posted by: NumberSix
» RE: It Don't Work That Way Posted by: NumberSix
» I have a idea Posted by: Krain61
» RE: It Don't Work That Way Posted by: off-the-radar 2
» RE: It Don't Work That Way Posted by: Krain61
Capitalism and the American Middle Class
Posted by: AGeach on May 31, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The goal of big business and our current Public Officials is to increase the Capitalism and continue to promote it as in the best interest of this country.
The only thing it IS in the best interest of, is themselves, while rapidly removing the middle class.
We are and have been on a fast track to a 2 class society. No longer will there be a middle class, only the wealthy and the slaves to keep them that way.
The design of the new immigration bill is set to insure this. The illegals will gain legal status, and continue to work for the depressed wages they are responsible for, and we are required to accept if we want to work. Our taxes will continue to remain high, and there will be an additional drain due to the increased ABUSE of social services that the now LEGAL, illegals will be free to fully avail themselves of.
While they're taxing away our income, they are giving increased tax breaks to the Capitalist corporations and the wealthy. We will be paying out more to keep the rich in their lifestyle, while THEY erode ours.

There is NO justification for the insane incomes top executives earn, NOR the additional benefits, stock options etc. that they are paid. Especially when the same companies giving those executive "perks" are laying off the very people that have made it possible for the jerk at the top to be there. How can an executive who has been with a company only 4 mos. possibly have earned the right to a 7 figure income? He has not even had the opportunity to prove himself.
Then there are the executives who lie, steal, cheat, and generally screw up a company, and they are given a tremendous exit package, upon leaving. Never mind that they are responsible for millions in loss, they are given mulit-million packages.
Capitalism is rapidly eroding the working class in this country, and if the tax payers don't vote out those responsible, as well as begin to hold companies and executives accountable, then it will happen faster than they can blink their eyes.

Their billing me for killing me!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are we returning to feudalism?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 31, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The evaporation of our middle class means that we are allowing the rich to return themselves to the position of royalty.

The justification for royalty was that it fought the wars and kept the peace. History shows that they preferred to war with each other.

Economists have been unable to agree on a designation for our time. I suggest "Return to Feudalism."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But in all fairness...
Posted by: sugamretniw on May 31, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess i'm not quite understanding why it's so bad that these executives get paid what they get paid. Capitalism is an artificial system, how does anyone say what should or shouldn't happen in such a system? If I could find a job that paid me 3x what I make now for doing the same work I would take it. As far as whether or not I "should" make that is irrelevant and subjective. How do I even know if I "should" be earning what i'm earning now? If some company wants to pay their CEO a billion dollars then by all means let them do it. What if I wanted to start a business and hire an employee and pay them 4x what others doing their job elsewhere make, who's business other than mine is that? If you are in a position and feel underpaid then perhaps you need to leave that position? It may not be "easy" but ease it not a requirement for life on Earth. I would say that there needs to be a redistribution of knowledge more than there needs to be a redistribution of wealth. Wealth is only a by-product of choices and decisions that some of us make based on certain information. I don't believe that the free-market system is the "best" but I do think that it's a good place to be for humanity in it's current state of evolution.

M

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But in all fairness... Posted by: Trazom
» RE: But in all fairness... Posted by: YogiBear
YEP-
Posted by: WitchyNy on May 31, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are slaves-and it is time for the slaves to revolt. The corrupt Democrats who just sold us out to fund the war are not going to do it for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deja Vu all over again
Posted by: willymack on May 31, 2007 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As the great philosopher, sage, and orator, Yogi Berra once said" A nickle ain't worth a dime no more". If you could graph our economic egality over time-say from the first Gulided Age, to the present one, you'd probably come up with something very close to a sine wave. The singular American inability to learn the lessons of history-indeed to even STUDY our history and draw correct inferences from it is unique in the world. Just look at how far Europe, Japan, and even China have surged ahead of us. I think our main problem here is our lack of historical perpective and the admiration of those who become wealthy while ignoring the fact that most of those wealthy people became so through theft and skullduggery. They're lionized at testmonial dinners and often asked to run for elective office instead of carefully observed as the thieves and liars they are. I'd even go so far as to say that many, if not most of them are mentally ill and are undeserving of the respect and acclaim they get. Now our embattled democracy staggers along under the onerous burden of these cannibals. Will we emerge from this newest threat to our very existence, or will we fall? Anybody got an answer to that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deja Vu all over again Posted by: Trazom
» RE: Deja Vu all over again Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Deja Vu all over again Posted by: Wastedaka
Just
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on May 31, 2007 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another in a long line of Articles by this author that screams entitlement and sore loser when you do not get what you think you deserve.... You want something in this world? YOU MAKE IT HAPPEN BY WORKING HARD AND NEVER GIVING UP ON YOUR DREAMS>>> NOONE IS ENTITLED TO ANYTHING>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just Posted by: Logic's Edge
CEO Salaries are a scandal and should become a public policy issue...
Posted by: yellow on May 31, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but probably won't. All you hear about is these guys voting themselves multi-million dollar golden parachute packages while they cut wages, move jobs overseas, and cut benefits. There needs to be laws about some of this stuff. People are not getting defined benefit packages like they used to but are paying in to retirement accounts and health funds and then getting the money cyphoned away in benefit cuts. This is ridiculous. Hard working people are getting ripped off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Enron But Slower
Posted by: hole11 on May 31, 2007 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The middle class is shrinking not expanding. The poor are finding it harder to move up. Now there is even a war to dwindle future social security recipients. Next it will be poisoned food. Wait, that might of happened already. What next?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's not use the term "earn"
Posted by: kateweski on May 31, 2007 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in complete agreement with Barbara Ehrenreich here. My only argument is that we MUST stop using the expression "CEO's earn etc." They are PAID etc. - whether or not they actually earn it is a highly debatable point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time for a Change
Posted by: nb1102 on May 31, 2007 12:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As illustrated by Ehrenreich's article, it's time for those at the top in the C-level suites to make some changes. It's time for business as a whole to set a better example. Check out Wal-Mart Watch's video letter to Wal-Mart's Board of Directors.

As read by Kristen Osman from Upland, California: “Wal-Mart can be about so much more than making money. It can be about leading the industry in fair labor practices. It can be about leading the field in environmentally sensitive causes. To many that I know, Wal-Mart has become a symbol of all that disturbs them about big business. You CAN change their minds and get them back into your stores by showing the kind of compassion for the world around you that wins the hearts and minds of your customers.”

It's time for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

revolt is still a bit into the future but...
Posted by: DaBear on May 31, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CEO's may one day need private armies to protect them from the rest. I'm betting on petro-collapse to be the catalyst.

WE ARE SPARTICUS! (only this time mebbe we win)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Knowledge is plentiful, Meaning is ignored
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 31, 2007 1:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The DOW is at 13.6k

Yet the economy has stalled during the last quarter.

Please folks, my name is Rush Limbaugh and I humbly ask you to ignore that big elephant in the middle of the room.

DOW up 50% so far this millenium. Real wages down by same amount, and more.

What is really happening is that the top 10% are just barely keeping up. The rest of us are sinking. Few are truly getting rich. I wonder how many of them can do it without downing pills all day long...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would love...
Posted by: Blue Heron on May 31, 2007 2:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to see America 'blow itself to smithereens.' Talk about entertainment. To quote Henry Miller:

"America is immune to all appeals. Her people do not understand the language of the poet. They do not wish to recognize suffering- it is too embarrassing. They do not greet Beauty with open arms - her presence is disturbing to heartless automatons. Their fear of violence drives them to commit insane cruelties. They have no reverence for form or image: they are bent on destroying whatever does not conform to their pattern, which is chaos. They are not even concerned with their own disintegration, because they are already putrescent. A vast congeries of rotting sepulchres, America holds for yet a little while, awaiting the opportune moment to blow itself to smithereens."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I would love... Posted by: freethink7
» RE: I would love... Posted by: Blue Heron
Child Slave Labor is Even More Unethical
Posted by: freethink7 on May 31, 2007 3:30 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s an outrage and a violation against a child’s most formative/influential stage development years………all at the expense of greedy corporate execs + CEOs.

For a list of "Most Wanted" Corporate Human Rights Violators
Go to this website:

CorpHumanRightsViolator

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Balance
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 31, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The existance of overly-paid CEOs automatically neccesitates the existance of slaves.

I wonder when you wil have your own Russian Revolution? It's only a matter of time, I think...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Agenda
Posted by: gracefounddog on May 31, 2007 10:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Immigration Bill (which can be read here: http://www.total411.info/Immigration070518.pdf ) is part of the Corporate Agenda to conquer and control all of us THE WORLD OVER. Both Democrats AND Republicans are losing their parties right now because we the American People are losing our country. This bill has the underlying intention of furthering the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, which WILL destroy our Republic if it is allowed into being:

Official site for this unconstitutional ‘partnership’ is here: http://www.spp.gov/
The Canadian Green Party has a great FAQ here: http://www.greenparty.ca/en/policy/spp_FAQ#5.

PLEASE READ ALL OF THIS!!! OUR SOVEREIGNTY IS THREATENED FROM THESE TRAITORS POSING AS OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!

I thought this Youtube video was pure BS but if you dig around you’ll see there’s something sinister going on here, all connected with the Immigration PLAN and the “Partnership”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-hvPJPTi4

Google: Homeland Security Contracts KBR for Vast New Detention Centers in US:


Finally, the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) is now being pushed by Bush Co for a quick vote.

Google: Last Stand For American Sovereignty (wont let me post link)

UNCLOS was formely LOST http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5493_0_6_0_C/ ):

The Cable Industry (the one that is trying to steal our internet commons away from the PEOPLE via stripping us of net neutrality) will benefit from UNCLOS being passed. Google this - I can't post the link for some reason.


All of this makes Directive 51 make perfectly evil sense: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFB_a3_VNnc

I am not inclined to conspiracy theories, but after digging around I have no doubt something evil this way comes!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kings borne aloft by servants
Posted by: kogwonton on May 31, 2007 10:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone ever seen a work of art depicting slaves being borne aloft on a litter by a king? I kind of doubt it. We know who creates wealth, and who 'carries' whom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Glad she mentioned academia
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 2, 2007 7:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad she mentioned academia!!!! "Adjuncts work for $5000 a semester or less." LESS, sometimes much less!!!! I was arguing about another subject with another alternet reader who felt my "problem" can be solved with a gym membership. Gym membership! Get real!!!! Hmmm, I don't have cable, high speed internet, a cell phone, ipod, air conditioning, a car, health insurance, dish washer, renters insurance, any fancy phone feature like call waiting etc. I haven't been on a real vacation in 6 years. Can't remember when I just went into a store and bought some article of clothing off the rack without waiting and hoping it will make the bargain table months later. What do I do for a living? Teach college as an adjunct!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Glad she mentioned academia Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
grandpa paid for me to go to college, now pays for me to TEACH college
Posted by: yurbud on Jun 3, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought if I got a master’s degree and taught college, I’d be able to support myself. But because I can only get part time faculty jobs that pay as little as half as much as a full time teaching job, offer no health insurance most of the time, and have gaps in pay between semesters and no guarantee of work or enough classes to survive from semester to semester, I have to ask my grandparents, 86 and 89 years old, to bail me out with a check from time to time.

My grandfather is proud to help me because I'm the most educated person in my family, and being a "professor" looks like part of that American Dream about each generation doing better than the one before.

Ironically, with two years of college, he was able to own a house and support a stay at home mom and three kids by my age while I consider myself lucky to make my rent, and that I have one school that provides health insurance for me alone (no family allowed).

I taught for eight years at four different districts before any of them offered me that health insurance. Before that, I was paying $200 a month out of pocket for a long-term medication.

I took out $50,000 in student loans to get the degree that’s required to do my job. That’s ballooned to over $100,000 with interest because it’s been tough to pay with irregular work and having to pay for any medical expenses out of pocket for eight years. My student loan payments are more than my rent.

I also work more than a full time load when my multiple jobs are added together, and split the difference between what I can teach effectively and the number of classes I need to pay my bills.

I wish my story were unique, but I know many part time faculty members who only have health insurance through their spouses or have none when a major medical crisis like cancer comes up. Others still live with their parents in their forties and fifties because they love teaching in spite of how we are treated.

What kind of morals and what about the value of education are we teaching our students when college instructors are treated like suckers and Walmart employees?

Something is profoundly wrong when our education system is aping the worst practices of the private sector rather than leading by example. Administrators have failed to act responsibly in these matters and need more guidance from the legislature.

equal pay for equal work for part time faculty

AFT fights for laws to end part time faculty abuse

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wage gap
Posted by: chseitz on Jun 6, 2007 7:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Editor:
In regard to the unemployment problem and the incursion of and the diminution of the middle-class, I would like to ose a question: In our Industrial Society if only ten percent of the population can p.roduce all our goods an services how are the other ninety percent goimg to get their fair share without our federal government becoming a socialst welfare state? I suggest that this can be done by changing the corporate structure to membership societies and changing the economic system. to where corporations can issue money. I explain all this in my book REVENGE AT HIGH TOR available at Amazon.com and I also urge reading Escape from Evil by Ernest Becker for background. This country is on a fast track to oblivion. The fox is in the henhouse and the inmates have taken over the asylum. . The old political game was the Liberals vs. the conservative but the new game in town is the mass of middle Americans with their vote vs. the handful of money people who are greedy and robing us. The Democratic party at the last election got a mandate to do something but they are still playing the old game. It is about time we did something, did something to save our country annd our way of life, the American Dream.

Charles H. Seitz
628 Topsfield Road
Hatboro, Pa 19040
(215) 675-5524
chseitz@voicenet.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real problem . . .
Posted by: yesman on Jun 6, 2007 10:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . is not really even CEO's. They at least have jobs, of a sort. So they're "working class," at least figuratively, even if they're absurdly overpaid for their "work."

The real problem is the "shareholders" in the corporation. They receive far larger sums than mere corporate officers, and these sums are paid for ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. They don't even have to go to an office or sit at a desk. Their contribution to the enterprise? "Owning." Next time you're hungry, try satisfying that hunger by "owning." That is to say, "owning" is not work, it's not productive, it is in fact literally nothing. It's simply a fiction which we allow to exist according to which some persons are allowed to retain the value of others' productive labor. If we weren't talking about "economics," that would be called stealing. Shareholders are parasites, pure and simple, and it is this parasitical relationship which is at the bottom of the absurd and unconscionable disparities in standards of living which we observe in the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yea
Posted by: dealmeinfo2 on Jun 20, 2007 2:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement