Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Female War Reporters Hide Sexual Abuse To Continue Getting Assignments

By Judith Matloff, Columbia Journalism Review. Posted June 7, 2007.


As more female reporters cover conflict zones, they face the same hurdles as their male counterparts and then some. In the macho world of overseas journalism, those who face sexual abuse often choose to say nothing at all.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Judith Matloff

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The photographer was a seasoned operator in South Asia. So when she set forth on an assignment in India, she knew how to guard against gropers: dress modestly in jeans secured with a thick belt and take along a male companion. All those preparations failed, however, when an unruly crowd surged and swept away her colleague. She was pushed into a ditch, where several men set upon her, tearing at her clothes and baying for sex. They ripped the buttons off her shirt and set to work on her trousers.

"My first thought was my cameras," recalls the photographer, who asked to remain anonymous. "Then it was, 'Oh my God, I'm going to be raped.' " With her faced pressed into the soil, she couldn't shout for help, and no one would have heard her anyway above the mob's taunts. Suddenly a Good Samaritan in the crowd pulled the photographer by the camera straps several yards to the feet of some policemen who had been watching the scene without intervening. They sneered at her exposed chest but escorted her to safety.

Alone in her hotel room that night, the photographer recalls, she cried, thinking, "What a bloody way to make a living." She didn't inform her editors, however. "I put myself out there equal to the boys. I didn't want to be seen in any way as weaker."

Women have risen to the top of war and foreign reportage. They run bureaus in dodgy places and do jobs that are just as dangerous as those that men do. But there is one area where they differ from the boys -- sexual harassment and rape. Female reporters are targets in lawless places where guns are common and punishment rare. Yet the compulsion to be part of the macho club is so fierce that women often don't tell their bosses. Groping hands and lewd come-ons are stoically accepted as part of the job, especially in places where Western women are viewed as promiscuous. War zones in particular seem to invite unwanted advances, and sometimes the creeps can be the drivers, guards, and even the sources that one depends on to do the job. Often they are drunk. But female journalists tend to grit their teeth and keep on working, unless it gets worse.

Because of the secrecy around sexual assaults, it's hard to judge their frequency. Yet I know of a dozen such assaults, including one suffered by a man. Eight of the cases involve forced intercourse, mostly in combat zones. The perpetrators included hotel employees, support staff, colleagues and the very people who are paid to guarantee safety -- policemen and security guards. None of the victims want to be named. For many women, going public can cause further distress. In the words of an American correspondent who awoke in her Baghdad compound to find her security guard's head in her lap, "I don't want it out there, for people to look at me and think, 'Hmmm. This guy did that to her, yuck.' I don't want to be viewed in my worst vulnerability."

The only attempt to quantify this problem has been a slim survey of female war reporters published two years ago by the International News Safety Institute, based in Brussels. Of the 29 respondents who took part, more than half reported sexual harassment on the job. Two said they had experienced sexual abuse. But even when the abuse is rape, few correspondents tell anyone, even friends. The shame runs so deep, and the fear of being pulled off an assignment, especially in a time of shrinking budgets, is so strong that no one wants intimate violations to resound in a newsroom.

Rodney Pinder, the director of the institute, was struck by how some senior newswomen he approached after the 2005 survey were reluctant to take a stand on rape. "The feedback I got was mainly that women didn't want to be seen as 'special' cases for fear that (a) it affected gender equality and (b) it hindered them getting assignments," he says.

Caroline Neil, who has done safety training with major networks over the past decade, agrees. "The subject has been swept under the carpet. It's something people don't like to talk about."

In the cases that I know of, the journalists did nothing to provoke the attacks; they behaved with utmost propriety, except perhaps for one bikini-clad woman who was raped by a hotel employee while sunbathing on the roof in a conservative Middle Eastern country. The correspondent who was molested by her Iraqi security guard is still puzzling over the fact that he brazenly crept into her room while colleagues slept nearby. "You do everything right, and then something like this happens," she says. "I never wore tight T-shirts or outrageous clothes. But he knew I didn't have a tribe that would go after him."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, rape, foreign correspondents

Judith Matloff , a writer living in New York, teaches at Columbia's Graduate School of Journalism. She worked for Reuters from 1983 to 1994.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RE: Its called the 3rd world
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jun 7, 2007 1:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well! Here I was about to start a thread of my own entitled something like "Some men really ARE animals, aren't they?" and there you go beating me to it by proving my point. Even if you were trying to be funny, you've still insulted about 1 billion innocent people in the process. Well done, Big Man.

-----------------
As I was going to say, we could cure the problems of these women by only sending them to women-only wars.

(...)

Oh YEAH! Silly ME - there's no such THING as women-only wars - ALL wars are caused, declared and run by men, while women, along with all the other innocent men and children, suffer. As usual.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Almost everything is run by men Posted by: White middleclass male
» RE: Its called the 3rd world Posted by: maestra
» RE: Its called the 3rd world Posted by: Aussie Kim
Deeeep delusions ...
Posted by: Joshua Holland on Jun 7, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it possible that this guy actually believes rape and sexual harrassment don't occur in "a middle class suburbs"?

All Praise be to Allah

Similarly, is he seriously arguing that Christians, Jews, Hindu, etc. don't commit rapes?

Could he really believe the nonsense that he's implying here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rape?? Posted by: gellero
» RE: Deeeep delusions ... Posted by: encode
Bikini-clad comment
Posted by: Markson on Jun 7, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That remark was inflammatory, however, unintentional it might be. If a little boy was snatched by a pedophile as he was playing near a pool in swim trunks no one would comment about what the boy was wearing. The circular logic that rapists use, whether they attack adults or children is: I am justified because I feel it's right. Obviously, there is no magical rape-proof wardrobe or behavior, or Afghanistan would be heaven on earth for women (and girls). Instead, when you, in effect, point the finger of blame to the victim you only serve to embolden the rapist by validating his rationalizations: she's to blame for my heterosexual desires (Right. Now heterosexuality is "wrong.").

Apologists should have integrity on the issue of lust excusing rape, w/ regards to gay men. These men are attracted to the male form (biological) and, thus, all men should be sure not to dress "provocatively" or behave "inappropriately" or else risk "provoking" an attack. If anything, gay men who rape men should be more "animalistic" than their straight counterparts since their target is not defenseless. Thus, all men should be even more careful than women.

Rape is a hate crime w/ sexual overtones. Just as no one would refer to a lynching as a "rope crime" no one should refer to rape as a "sex crime." Sexuality is simply the medium which to express violent hate. (Note: violence is overwhelmingly learned behavior and since rape requires coercion, such force undermines the very definition of "natural."). Arousal simply indicates desire, which can be manipulated (see: pedophilia), and does not excuse rape as instinctive (this is where rape apologists insert that circular logic). This is especially true since men can be celibate and survive (sexual contact w/ others is a privilege mistaken as a necessity), men can seduce women (women have libidos as well), and masturbation is always on call to appease the most urgent of desires.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bikini-clad comment Posted by: Markson
RE: Its called the 3rd world
Posted by: kabac55 on Jun 7, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And can we suppose, then, that the patrol of young US soldiers who abducted & raped a teenage Afghanistani girl--then murdered her, her family and tried to burn the "evidence" grew up in those middle class suburbs you mention?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sheesh!
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jun 7, 2007 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm often amazed at what some reporters will go through to get where the action is or get information.

It's definitely not the career for me. I'll stick with boring and menial. I don't need that kind of adventure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This writer has got to be kidding!!!!!
Posted by: TassieDevil on Jun 7, 2007 5:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"But there is one area where they differ from the boys -- sexual harassment and rape. Female reporters are targets in lawless places where guns are common and punishment rare."

How many women journalists from Al-Jazeers are currently being held in G'tmo Bay...and how many men???
How many women were shot dead in Balbo East Timor when Indonesia invaded in the seventies????
How many women journalists have been subjected to excruciating pain including crushed genitals, electric shock treatment and repeated beatings to such areas which is now an accepted hazard for reporters trying to get stories out???
How many women journalists were killed when the US opened fire on the hotel in Iraq where the journalist were know to be hold up????
There is no excuse for rape, torture, cruelty, no matter which sex. And to insinuate, as this article does, that only women have a tough time of it, shows just how out of touch this so called journalist is with an industry notorious for not protecting its workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Read it again ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: ead it again ... Posted by: TassieDevil
» RE: ead it again ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
Occupational risks
Posted by: gdonald on Jun 7, 2007 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are occupational risks in every occupation. War zones make the occupational risks even more dangerous. That is why I do not agree that women should be in combat zones or war zones. It isn't because I don't think that women are dumb or not able to do the job. That has nothing to do with it. It is because war brings out the worst in human behavior and when you are sent in to a war zone, especially in countries that have no respect for women, then you certainly are already in jeapordy just because you are a women.

It's shameful that some men behave as such in war but knowing that it is happening should make Bureau Chiefs realize that a women may not be the wisest choice in covering stories in a war zone. Of course no bureau chief wants to be accused of discrimination so he assigns the female journalist the job to avoid lawsuits. Can't blame them. Female journalists should also have the wisdom to avoid these countries but then the prevailing attitude is, I'm as good as any man so send me or I'll file discrimination charges. No one can be guaranteed safety in peace time let alone war. It's just a fact of life. Count the costs first and then decide but once you decide to go to the war there is no way you can be sure of your safety.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Occupational risks Posted by: fork
» fork Posted by: gdonald
» RE: fork Posted by: fork
No I don't think a gang rape...
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jun 7, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is as likely to happen in the 'burds as it is with the dredge of society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's the solution?
Posted by: melissa999 on Jun 7, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Encourage women to report their crimes at the so-called risk losing their jobs because they will be seen as a liability or receive self-defense training?

Indeed, "she knew how to guard against gropers: dress modestly in jeans secured with a thick belt and take along a male companion. All those preparations failed, however.." An angry mob is not concerned about a thick belt.

The impetus is on the victims to "prevent" rape by dressing modestly, taking along a male companion, carrying deodorant, claiming to menstruate, not going out after dark...oh, wait a minute...

Case in point: the woman who was abducted and killed in Kansas after shopping at Target. What was her "mistake" exactly? Not carrying a loaded gun?

Looks like another promo for RapeX, the South African anti-rape female condom....

Drastic times call for drastic measures.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What's the solution? Posted by: Blue Heron
Damned if you are … damned if you aren’t … Raped, that is.
Posted by: BenCaxton12 on Jun 7, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what women who want dangerous assignments do NOT want, is to not be able to go on dangerous assignments because of paternalistic protectionism from their editors and bureau chiefs who will feel they are supposed to feel worse if one of their ‘girls’ is raped than if two of their ‘men’ are shot.

For women journalists, the danger is at least coming from ‘the other side,’ and here’s even a case to be made that in Iraq, “The Terrorists” treat kidnapped foreign women BETTER than they treat male reporters, soldiers, contractors, etc. when they take them hostage.

Anyone paying attention during the Clinton years would have noticed a major excuse for not offering equal opportunity, pay and promotion to women in the Armed Services was that they could not be employed in combat operations … the REAL work of the Army .. for fear of rape by the Enemy. As it turned out, she-soldiers faced more rape, exploitation and harassment at the hands (sic) of comrades and instructors than.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

misogyny etc
Posted by: xtymcg on Jun 7, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wow. The responses to this article go to show how entrenched misogyny really is in our culture (not just those "backward third world" places.)
We've got:
1. Well of course you're going to get raped, people in the third world are animals.
2. It's just an occupational hazard, you should have known that when you got into reporting (I don't see anyone spouting THAT drivel when reporters are kidnapped).
3. Rape doesn't compare to all the torture that men go through (Okay, to insinuate that men are hurt more than women in war zones is just plain ignorant. That comment shows such a blantantly skewed world view I feel compelled to point out that ALL PEOPLE are tortured in war zones, including children. And what in the world is the point of saying "my torture is worse than yours?" because that's what rape is--it ususally includes torture, degredation of the worst kind, and often murder).
4. Women shouldn't be employed as war correspondents anyway--rape is just a fact of life which makes women incompatible with the job. (again, don't hear anyone saying that when reporters are shot or kidnapped. oh, oops, your fault for being there! I guess NO ONE should be employed as a war correspondent! This crap is the REASON women aren't reporting the fact that they are being brutalized!!!!!).

What a disgusting display. I'm more shocked by the responses to this article than the article itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sadly, I wasn't surprised. Posted by: MatthewSavage
» Me neither ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Me neither ... Posted by: icj
» RE: Me neither ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Sadly, I wasn't surprised. Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Sadly, I wasn't surprised. Posted by: xconservative
Rape free for all until all the men are freed!
Posted by: s_mead on Jun 7, 2007 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your STFU about rape until as many women as men are in Gitmo argument is patently ridiculous and your lack of empathy for a type of human suffering that is not experienced by people just like you is appalling.

One: Sexual abuse is a problem that needs to be addressed in addition to other problems not instead of.

Two: You keep going on about absolute numbers of men and women in combat situations instead of percentages. There are fewer women in those jobs. Women have been actively prevented from getting the jobs that put people in those situations. Women are still prohibited from holding combat positions in the US military. And the society and organizations that prevent women from taking dangerous jobs are run by men who argue that we are inferior and inadequate.

Three: The article clearly states that there are not accurate statistics on female versus male journalists in the field -- especially as it relates to sexual abuse. Why don't you name all the men who were trapped in the situations you mention? This is a classic tactic: Set an impossible task (name everyone who has ever been trapped in a hotel during shelling), then claim that your opponent's failure to complete it proves your point.

Four: You seem deeply offended by the fact that this writer chose to discuss sexual abuse of female journalists and not torture of male journalists. Find a main stream media article on sexual abuse of female journalists. Would we find a few articles on the heroism and suffering of male journalists? A few dozen, maybe? And yet you're so offended by one measly article on an alternative news site that isn't about people just like you.

Don't bother replying to this. You aren't worth any more of my time. Hell, you weren't worth this much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Thought I KNEW
Posted by: douglashoyt on Jun 7, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently, the world is more violent and vicious than I once believed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT??
Posted by: gellero on Jun 7, 2007 3:53 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would expect that most posters here have never been to a real third world country. I've been there many times. They are NOT like us. A female reporter in hostile territory is considered fair game. Add to this the ubiquitous culture of government corruption, many think they can (and do) get away with anything. The masses of the lower classes, especially in Muslim countries, are sexually repressed. They know virginity beyond teens is rare in our culture. They want a piece of the action. Get them together in a mob, and anything goes. Why would anyone expect anything else?? They are BARBARIANS. Get used to it. Their culture will never change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT?? Posted by: Mondracon
» RE: WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT?? Posted by: EKSwitaj
Humans are the same everywhere: A person or group without power will be abused
Posted by: sarahk on Jun 7, 2007 5:20 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whether you are living in the first world or the third world, a lack of power means you will be abused. For women and some men, this means rape among other abuses.
Rape Situations We Currently Have In The US:
1. Massively high rate of rape and sexual abuse against Native American women. The latest study says that 86% of these rapes are from white men. Unfortunantely, these rapist are very aware that Native women are living in areas miles from police or authorities and that because of poverty and/or fear, they lack the resources to bring their attacker to trial. The high rate of white attackers is striking when in every other demographic group the vast majority of rapes are committed by an attacker of the same race. Historically, this behavior by white rapist can be seen as a surviving remnant of early European American's attitude toward the Native people. Did you know that the word Sqaw (the word used in early America by white Americans to describe a Native woman) actually means c### in a Native American dialect?
2. Extremely High Rates of Rape in US Prisons
Go to Human Rights Watch.com website and read their report on rape in our prison system. Unlike other Western "civilized" countries, rape of inmates in US prisons is a huge problem. Keep in mind that we have started jailing 16, 17 and 18 year-olds boys in adult prisons. These kids are not full grown and have no chance of fighting off an attack by an adult male. Also, US prisons are increasingly gang-oriented. If you are not a gang member, you are at high-risk for being turned into a sex slave by one of these gangs. Another issue is that among Western countries, we are the only one that allows males to guard female prisoners. These female prisoners cannot expect any justice if attacked. If they complain, it could make their lives even worse. Who will stop the guard from retaliating? People think this subject is a big joke. How many times have you heard a prison rape joke in a movie or sitcom?

Before we start cleaning up other countries, let's clean up our own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Training
Posted by: catchaotica on Jun 8, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What women need are not only training on traveling, but actuall women's self defense classes, and perhaps some martial arts training.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not only journalists..
Posted by: Reader11722 on Jun 8, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many women in the army are being raped (by ours and theirs) and the gov't controlled news refuses to cover it. Facism's final level of censorship finally arrived in the US as reporter Matt Lepacek was arrested for asking about 9/11 and reporter Chris Bollyn was convicted for exposing 9/11. This is all about the First Amendment. The US gov't (and their corporate friends), already censor Dr. Ron Paul, arrest protesters, ban books like "America Deceived" from Amazon and Wikipedia, shut down Imus and fire 21-year tenured, BYU physics professor Steven Jones because he proved explosives, thermite in particular, took down the WTC buildings. They finally are coming for the Press (maybe Alternet is next). Good luck, Bollyn and Lepacek.
Final link (until the Stark County Library bends to pressure and drops the title):
America Deceived (book)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Matter of Degree
Posted by: Mondracon on Jun 8, 2007 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The difference is not the existence of rape in 3rd world countries but the degree and impunity with which it is carried out. Many women suffer in silence in these countries since women have few or no rights of their own and their suffering is blamed on THEM, the victims of the crime, instead of the perpetrators. (Yes, to a small degree the victim is viewed as having "responsibility" ("she should have known better..." etc.) in the western world by chauvinist elements of our society—but the LAWS are written to the contrary—for justice, respect and protection of the victim—not further embarrassment and suffering as in certain fundamentalist Islamic countries, etc.).

There is no doubt that rape occurs in every country in the world, especially in war-torn areas where the worst aspects of humanity are revealed (war is always hell). The difference is how it is viewed and handled by the populous and governments of each nation.

This quote illustrates:
"Suddenly a Good Samaritan in the crowd pulled the photographer by the camera straps several yards to the feet of some policemen who had been watching the scene without intervening. They sneered at her exposed chest but escorted her to safety."

Rapists do not openly attack women at crowded, public places in America because other citizens would stop them. Even if they did nothing, American police do not stand by watching such events occur—they intervene to protect women and punish the perpetrators. If the police did not act to prevent an attack and it was witnessed or discovered there would be public outcry from the American citizenry and the police officers would lose their jobs and face criminal charges. There would be complete outrage over a situation like this. This creates an environment where rape is not tolerated and this crime is less frequent.

This is not to say the western justice system is perfect-- no law or justice system is without flaw—but this system as a whole is less tolerant of injustice to women than certain 3rd world countries and that western women traveling in foreign lands need to be aware of this for their own personal safety.

The developed world is not perfect and not without injustice —but developed nations constantly seek TO IMPROVE—with every law, with public outcry, with investigation—to promote freedom, justice and security for ALL their citizens regardless of age, race, gender, or religion. There is a GOAL, and that goal is safety, harmony and prosperity for all people—the majority seeks compassion and justice and condemns wrongdoing in an effort to improve the lives of people.

This is because the MAJORITY of citizens of the developed world are INTOLERANT OF INHUMANE CRIMES (rape, torture, slavery, etc). They are not always aware of injustice, but when they discover it there is outrage and they push police, lawmakers, and leaders to stop the crime, to help the victims, to IMPROVE.

No nation is perfect, no country is without injustice, no society is without crime—the only difference is the goal-- that daily struggle against brutality and injustice.
Athough things are not “perfect” in the developed world and women still face challenges of inequality—they are used to a better life. These women have more rights and face less violence than women in 3rd world nations. These same women are shocked by the brutality and total disregard they are treated with in the 3rd world.

Final questions:
In that story were the men who attacked the woman ever punished?
If not, were the police held accountable for letting the perpetrators get away unpunished?
If not, why didn’t the citizens of that nation call for justice and demand the police protect women from such attacks?
Was the “Good Samaritan” who rescued her publicly celebrated as a hero?
IF NOT, WHY NOT?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What exactly is the point?
Posted by: Trapper on Jun 10, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author acknowledges that calling for safer war zones for women would be pointless and actually seems to conclude by calling for rape acceptance training for women headed into one. Is getting raped outside of a war zone any less traumatic? War zones are never going to be safe places to work, and getting raped is not the worst thing that can happen to you in one. Anyone with a hint of intelligence should consider the multitude of dangers prior to accepting the assignment so I honestly just don't get the point of the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What exactly is the point? Posted by: Joanna Kam