COMMENTS: 94
Cheney Poses With Newborn Grandson, But Not His Lesbian Daughter
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Picture the photo of the Vice President and his wife and their newborn grandchild -- fresh from delivery and still wrapped in his hospital-issue receiving blanket. What's missing here? The child's parents, of course.
The fact that this White House chose to announce the birth of Vice President Cheney's grandson -- Samuel David Cheney -- with a photo of the baby without either one of his two mothers in sight should come as no surprise. This administration continues to try to have its cake and eat it too when it comes to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) Americans.
Think about it. Samuel is the Cheney's sixth grandchild -- but can you recall seeing photos of any of the other grandchildren? The only thing that makes Samuel's birth newsworthy at all is that his birth mother, Mary Cheney, is both a lesbian and the daughter of the man who is second in command of an administration that has been more destructive to the lives of LGBT parents and their families than any other group in American history.
By virtue of Mary's status as the Vice President's daughter, she and her partner, Heather Poe, continue to be arguably the most prominent Republican lesbian couple in the country. Mary's pregnancy has been covered by the media since it was first announced. The couple welcomed their first child, Samuel, into the world earlier this week. And yet the mothers are not included in the photo that was sent out to announce the birth of their child.
A more astute media might be asking why there is no photo availability of the entire family, but that is not happening. As a result of the absence of a compelling and truly representative visual to accompany the story, there has been minimal media coverage of the latest addition to one of the nation's most prominent LGBT-headed families. Once again, this administration has manipulated the media for its own purposes -- and the media has allowed them to do so. And, once again, LGBT-headed families remain largely faceless and invisible to the majority of America.
As a lesbian mother and an advocate for full equality for LGBT-headed American families, I have followed Mary Cheney's pregnancy with great interest and empathy. I have read and appreciated her statement that their baby is a "gift from God" -- for is that not true of all children?
I certainly believe that about mine. I have also read Mary's statement that, in her view, their child is "not a political statement." I wish that were also true. I absolutely join Mary and Heather in their desire to live in a world -- and to raise their son in a world -- in which that were the case. However, the unfortunate reality is that our children and our families are politicized -- but not by us. Mary and Heather's invisibility in the public announcement of their own son's birth is proof of that reality.
It is no secret that President Bush and Vice President Cheney's re-election campaign strategy centered around mobilizing the most conservative elements of the Republican Party by targeting LGBT people and their families. Ballot initiatives about same-sex marriage were introduced in many states with the specific intent of bringing religious conservatives to the polls.
However, when asked about his daughter Mary's sexual orientation, Vice President Cheney has consistently asserted his love and support for his daughter. In addition, the Vice President was described by an official White House spokesperson as "looking forward with eager anticipation" to the birth of his sixth grandchild. Additionally, when asked specifically about Mary and Heather becoming parents, President Bush replied that he thought Mary would be "a loving soul to her child" and "a fine mom." Mary's partner, Heather, reportedly even receives protection from the Secret Service.
Nevertheless, in a cowardly move to mollify their conservative base, the administration stripped Samuel's lesbian mothers from the picture heralding his arrival. It simply doesn't get any more political than that.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ZPaul on May 28, 2007 2:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Has Mary Cheney Not Fought Harder For Gay Rights?
Posted by: jimidee
» Perhaps because not everyone is able to take on that battle ...
Posted by: SayBlade
» And she has nowhere near the amount of power her father has in this matter, or. . .
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oneyedjack on May 28, 2007 3:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question is; "why isn't Mary Cheney or Heather Poe in the photo?" Answer: because Mary Cheney (and by association her partner) are fu**ing cowards. They do what daddy says. Why long for that which isn't? Mary Cheney may be a lesbian; but she certainly isn't a role model, at least not for any LGBT people that I know.
Get over yourself and quit trying to hold Mary Cheney (or, at least your idea of Mary Cheney-and how she is supposed to act) to your standards. Get a grip.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah Mary is a "coward"
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: flaco50 on May 28, 2007 3:27 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republican after what this crowd has done..THEY SHOULD BE
SHOT!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: voting republican
Posted by: jimidee
» RE: voting republican
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 4:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, Dick, but real conservatives don’t change the Constitution. They solve social problems with legislation, the way our forefathers intended.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite...or IS he?
Posted by: jimidee
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite...or IS he?
Posted by: willymack
» Only a heartless homophobic hypocrite would think the self-serving photo-op would work.
Posted by: HughScott
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite...or IS he?
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite.."real conservatives"
Posted by: Progressive Citizen
» So that's what a conservative is . . .
Posted by: slydad
» RE: So that's what a conservative is . . .answer to slydad
Posted by: Progressive Citizen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 28, 2007 4:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the media has been following the story, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect the dots, so Dick is still in the middle of it. Even before the baby, the fact that his daughter is a lesbian had been well-publicized.
If you were to have a baby or grandkid, wouldn't you like to be the one to decide which pictures to release to the public, rather than political interests?
It's one thing to be cynical and point out the irony, but another thing to be outraged. It seems like an overreaction.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So what?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Eh wot?
Posted by: hagwind
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aislinnluv on May 28, 2007 5:02 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: vote with your kid
Posted by: Ayla87
» RE: vote with your kid
Posted by: specom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on May 28, 2007 5:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"She's my sister AND my daughter!" --Evelyn Mulwray, Chinatown
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paschn on May 28, 2007 5:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AS for his lesbian daughter,....can there BE a better reason for prefering a same sex partner than the horror produced at realizing YOUR father has demonic genes?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seenaymah on May 28, 2007 6:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to all the press reports I've read, she has no claim to the child at all. If she and Mary Cheney go their separate ways, she has no legal rights to visitations or support, no say in any of the decisions that parents make for their children (education, religion, etc.).
I just don't understand how someone could be happy with a situation like that. To my mind, there's no such thing as gay rights -- only human rights. If two consenting adults, regardless of sex, make the committment to raise a child, they should be afforded the same protections and rights across the board.
Yet the ReThugs seem to be determined to keep those rights and protections from her and from same-sex partners across the country -- led by "Buckshot" Cheney. How can Heather even stand to be in the same room with Cheney? How can he even look her in the face?
Or does Mary visit her parents alone?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mary & Heather, SAY SOMETHING, D*MMIT!!!
Posted by: ZPaul
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jannahanna on May 28, 2007 6:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jannahanna on May 28, 2007 6:55 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Baby Cheney
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PandaBear on May 28, 2007 7:14 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, how can it be said that that this administration has been the worst for GLBT families in history?
Up until Clinton, no president has done squat for us! And Clinton wasn't that great either...but at least he admitted we existed and spoke of us in a positive way.
So how are they the worst? I'd say they are just as bad. One might even say that Reagan was worse.
Andrew
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Worst in history?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Worst in history?
Posted by: hagwind
» well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cellorelio on May 28, 2007 8:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aside from a slick PR campaign targeting younger queers unfamiliar with the Coors family legacy, nothing much has changed. Coors Brewing may no longer ask if a prospective employee is homosexual, but the Coors family still uses the money they make from sales of their beer to support anti-queer conservative causes.
Former Coors Brewing Chair Pete Coors ran for US Senate in 2004 as an outspoken supporter of a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.
Way to support queer families Mary. Though, I guess when daddy's the VP, you only really have to worry about your own family.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good thing coors is swill to begin with. nm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Good thing coors is swill to begin with. nm
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: motamanx on May 28, 2007 8:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 28, 2007 9:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ooooooh. Those quever, maniacal qwandpawents!
Seriously, why do I give a tin hoot on the choices the family makes with their family pictures? Aren't there more important, deliberate blunders that Cheney has made besides failing to satisfy this author's personal preference for pictorial arrangements?
I mean...weren't there some important things going on in the world? Meh. Maybe not a select few.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Undoubtedly, the omission was due to a grand conspiracy...
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Silliness.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
Comments are closed-
Posted by: butterfly2 on May 28, 2007 10:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason "the two mothers" are missing (from the pic) is that we are required to pretend that no male sperm was needed for a female Cheney to become pregnant....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hmmm
Posted by: babs
» RE: Hmmm
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Hmmm...chilly yet?
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 28, 2007 10:56 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Absurd. Cheney might be the Darth Vader of the White House cabal
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» This is indeed absurd.
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: This is indeed absurd.
Posted by: specom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 12:10 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nor should we be fooled by his wife’s seemingly loving attitude towards little Samuel. Lynn Cheney is absolutely the last grandmother he deserves -- a rightwing clone of her heartless hubby.
In 1995, Mrs. Cheney founded the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), a conservative group that monitors American colleges and academia. A current member of ACTA's national council is archconservative Irving Kristol, father of Bill Kristol, founder of the rightwing subversive organization and prime instigator of Gulf War 2 -- Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
Not coincidentally two ACTA trustees are PNAC members: William Bennett (one of PNAC's 25 founders including Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Scooter Libby and UN Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad) and Martine Peretez.
Lynn Cheney is presently a senior fellow at the neocon front foundation, American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Other AEI scholars, past and present, include the following PNAC members:
John Bolton
Reuel Marc Gerecht, director of PNAC’s Iraq Initiative and former CIA Middle East specialist.
Newt Gingrich
Fred Kagan
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, PNAC founder.
Joshua Muravchik.
Richard Perle
Danielle Pletka, PNAC founder who claimed on C-SPAN that the neocon front organization wasn’t associated with AEI.
Other noteworthy AEI senior fellows include:
David Frum, author and former Bush 43 speechwriter.
Alan Keyes.
Christina Hoff Sommers, feminist movement critic and the author of Who Stole Feminism.
Fred Thompson.
John Yoo, university professor and former advisor in the Bush 43 Office of Legal Counsel who advocated torture of Gitmo detainess, to include crushing the testicles of teenaged combatants.
With a political background like Dick and Lynn Cheney's, I would suggest to Mary Cheney that family treatment in kind is worth considering. For the sake of her son's future mental health, she should completely disown his rightwing homophobic grandparents.
For AlterNet visitors unfamiliar with PNAC who desire more information, visit the non-profit investigative website, FreedomCentralUSA.com.
AlterNeters aware of PNAC will appreciate the website's alphabetical list of 225 members (called "signatories”), including Democrat hawks with liberal skins such as Bill Clinton's former Secretary of State Madeline Albright.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlemanintheboat on May 28, 2007 2:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a sperm donor...and one of my nightmares since
is my genetics becoming part of the spawn of satan's (spoken by an atheist)..one day the doorbell rings - 'ding dong!' hellooo papa..hissssssss!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It was David Crosby
Posted by: James T. Swaggart
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AFWXMAN on May 28, 2007 2:40 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Imagine my surprise
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir on May 28, 2007 4:22 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we reaching this hard for stories against the Rethugs? I mean, come on! These people are as crazy as a bag of ferrets! There's bigger fish to fry, I'm sure!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 4:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politician Faced Questions in Bookkeeping Scandal
By MARI YAMAGUCHI
AP
TOKYO (May 28) -- Japan's agriculture minister died Monday after hanging himself just hours before he was to face questioning in a political scandal, officials said, dealing a powerful blow to the increasingly beleaguered government ahead of July elections.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: slydad on May 28, 2007 4:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's next? Look at the way George Bush brushes his teeth . . . It's clearly a sign that he's a Jew hater from that. And what about the way Newt Gingrich combs his hair. Wow, he must really hate women. And what about the way Bill Clinton scratches his crotch . . . well, we all know what that means.
Get a life liberals!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's about a pattern of deceitful photo-ops Cheney uses to fool the American people. Or tries to.
Posted by: HughScott
» No it's not
Posted by: slydad
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: slydad
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: slydad
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: You gotta be kidding
Posted by: tweedster
» RE: You gotta be kidding
Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Learn how to punctuate this!
Posted by: slydad
» BTW - in response to another stupid question of yours.
Posted by: slydad
» RE: BTW - in response to another stupid question of yours.
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 6:13 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A charitable organization based in Montgomery, Texas, and managed by Dr. Bob Meaders, Operation-Helmet supplies FREE helmet upgrade kits to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as to those ordered to deploy in the near future.
Manufactured by Oregon Aero Inc, the helmet upgrades provide three primary things:
Protection : Shock-absorbing pads keep the helmet from slapping the skull when hit with blast forces, fragments, or being tumbled along the ground or inside a vehicle. This decreases the chance of brain injury from IED's, bombs, RPG's, vehicle accidents, falls, etc.
Comfort: A comfortable helmet will stay on a trooper's head longer and more often.
Stability: Keeps the helmet firmly on the head and out of the eyes.
As of today, 05-28-07, Operation Helmet had a waiting list of 215 names. Disgracefully for the world's richest nation, with special shame on President Bush and the Pentagon for doing nothing to end the shortage, it was due to inadequate contributions, not manufacturing problems.
NOTE: The U.S. Army has been supplying its combat units with less expensive liner pads made by a skateboard helmet company.
According to emails received by Operation-Helmet.org, the government-issued pads are hot, hard and uncomfortable. Some GIs are removing the pads and pounding them with a hammer to make the material softer and more wearable, which reduces protection against explosions.
Because the DOD has refused to promote Operation-Helmet.org, some GIs in the Middle East don't know the improved Oregon Aero pad system exists, despite publicity generated by the famous singer rock star, Cher. Our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve the BEST equipment available, not the cheapest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "You go to war with Army you have, not what you want"
Posted by: CatDad
» Giving our troops the best helmet liners available is about SAVING THER LIVES, you idiot!
Posted by: HughScott
» RE: Giving our troops the best helmet liners available is about SAVING THER LIVES, you idiot!
Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Thanks, dangerouslysane, I can't believe hateful so-called antiwar people can be.
Posted by: HughScott
» RE:
Posted by: CatDad
» ME a "Bush supporter"? Obviously, CatDad, you have NEVER visited my King-George.biz website.
Posted by: HughScott
» Is this an Ad??
Posted by: gellero
» The Operation-Helmet.org website will answer your questions and eliminate your skepticism.
Posted by: HughScott
» And your claims of superiority are full? Of what?
Posted by: Beck
» I'm a Vietnam vet, m'am. Take your pompous, Bush-loving, OOO-RAH bullshit and shove it!
Posted by: HughScott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on May 28, 2007 9:11 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's a selfish act to bring any child into the world
Posted by: Beck
» ?????
Posted by: gellero
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on May 28, 2007 10:34 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billlies on May 28, 2007 10:40 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for the war. It's Hillary Clintons', John Edwards' John Kerrys' etc., as much as it is Cheneys'. Cheney didn't vote for the war. They did. As Cindy Sheanen notes, the left used her when they had no power. Now, they role over.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Dick Cheney, roll model
Posted by: YogiBear
» In This Instance
Posted by: gellero
» RE: In This Instance
Posted by: tweedster
» He is a good role model, I suppose, for his own gay daughter. It's all the other gay children. .
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SJR505 on May 29, 2007 4:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My gut feelings is that the supreme being is rewarding "cheney' in his own way to saddle him with the glaring evil of what he , cheney, has made the American familes suffer for loss of our warriors...It is a glaring abomnimation of cheney and his family in full view of the world...
It could be worse, cheny having a heart attack, cancer or his daugher, grandchild having HIV which may still occur, or whatever could befall an evil man of cheney's reputation...Your guess is as good as mine...Man , the blood he and Bush "The Weasel" have on their hands could flood the Amazon River and fill the "The Lake of Fire"...
S. JIM RODRIGUEZ+ECLECTICIST SPIRIT SEEKER+
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chief of okeefe on May 29, 2007 6:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put him in the picture too!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redheadeddude on Jun 23, 2007 3:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redheadeddude on Jun 23, 2007 3:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ZPaul on May 28, 2007 2:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Has Mary Cheney Not Fought Harder For Gay Rights?
Posted by: jimidee
» Perhaps because not everyone is able to take on that battle ...
Posted by: SayBlade
» And she has nowhere near the amount of power her father has in this matter, or. . .
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oneyedjack on May 28, 2007 3:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question is; "why isn't Mary Cheney or Heather Poe in the photo?" Answer: because Mary Cheney (and by association her partner) are fu**ing cowards. They do what daddy says. Why long for that which isn't? Mary Cheney may be a lesbian; but she certainly isn't a role model, at least not for any LGBT people that I know.
Get over yourself and quit trying to hold Mary Cheney (or, at least your idea of Mary Cheney-and how she is supposed to act) to your standards. Get a grip.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Yeah Mary is a "coward"
Posted by: jimidee
Comments are closed-
Posted by: flaco50 on May 28, 2007 3:27 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republican after what this crowd has done..THEY SHOULD BE
SHOT!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: voting republican
Posted by: jimidee
» RE: voting republican
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 4:29 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, Dick, but real conservatives don’t change the Constitution. They solve social problems with legislation, the way our forefathers intended.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite...or IS he?
Posted by: jimidee
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite...or IS he?
Posted by: willymack
» Only a heartless homophobic hypocrite would think the self-serving photo-op would work.
Posted by: HughScott
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite...or IS he?
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: A heartless homophobic hypocrite.."real conservatives"
Posted by: Progressive Citizen
» So that's what a conservative is . . .
Posted by: slydad
» RE: So that's what a conservative is . . .answer to slydad
Posted by: Progressive Citizen
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 28, 2007 4:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the media has been following the story, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to connect the dots, so Dick is still in the middle of it. Even before the baby, the fact that his daughter is a lesbian had been well-publicized.
If you were to have a baby or grandkid, wouldn't you like to be the one to decide which pictures to release to the public, rather than political interests?
It's one thing to be cynical and point out the irony, but another thing to be outraged. It seems like an overreaction.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So what?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» Eh wot?
Posted by: hagwind
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aislinnluv on May 28, 2007 5:02 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: vote with your kid
Posted by: Ayla87
» RE: vote with your kid
Posted by: specom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on May 28, 2007 5:14 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"She's my sister AND my daughter!" --Evelyn Mulwray, Chinatown
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paschn on May 28, 2007 5:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AS for his lesbian daughter,....can there BE a better reason for prefering a same sex partner than the horror produced at realizing YOUR father has demonic genes?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seenaymah on May 28, 2007 6:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to all the press reports I've read, she has no claim to the child at all. If she and Mary Cheney go their separate ways, she has no legal rights to visitations or support, no say in any of the decisions that parents make for their children (education, religion, etc.).
I just don't understand how someone could be happy with a situation like that. To my mind, there's no such thing as gay rights -- only human rights. If two consenting adults, regardless of sex, make the committment to raise a child, they should be afforded the same protections and rights across the board.
Yet the ReThugs seem to be determined to keep those rights and protections from her and from same-sex partners across the country -- led by "Buckshot" Cheney. How can Heather even stand to be in the same room with Cheney? How can he even look her in the face?
Or does Mary visit her parents alone?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mary & Heather, SAY SOMETHING, D*MMIT!!!
Posted by: ZPaul
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jannahanna on May 28, 2007 6:53 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jannahanna on May 28, 2007 6:55 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Baby Cheney
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PandaBear on May 28, 2007 7:14 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However, how can it be said that that this administration has been the worst for GLBT families in history?
Up until Clinton, no president has done squat for us! And Clinton wasn't that great either...but at least he admitted we existed and spoke of us in a positive way.
So how are they the worst? I'd say they are just as bad. One might even say that Reagan was worse.
Andrew
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Worst in history?
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Worst in history?
Posted by: hagwind
» well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cellorelio on May 28, 2007 8:01 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aside from a slick PR campaign targeting younger queers unfamiliar with the Coors family legacy, nothing much has changed. Coors Brewing may no longer ask if a prospective employee is homosexual, but the Coors family still uses the money they make from sales of their beer to support anti-queer conservative causes.
Former Coors Brewing Chair Pete Coors ran for US Senate in 2004 as an outspoken supporter of a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.
Way to support queer families Mary. Though, I guess when daddy's the VP, you only really have to worry about your own family.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Good thing coors is swill to begin with. nm
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Good thing coors is swill to begin with. nm
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: motamanx on May 28, 2007 8:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 28, 2007 9:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ooooooh. Those quever, maniacal qwandpawents!
Seriously, why do I give a tin hoot on the choices the family makes with their family pictures? Aren't there more important, deliberate blunders that Cheney has made besides failing to satisfy this author's personal preference for pictorial arrangements?
I mean...weren't there some important things going on in the world? Meh. Maybe not a select few.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Undoubtedly, the omission was due to a grand conspiracy...
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Silliness.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
Comments are closed-
Posted by: butterfly2 on May 28, 2007 10:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason "the two mothers" are missing (from the pic) is that we are required to pretend that no male sperm was needed for a female Cheney to become pregnant....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hmmm
Posted by: babs
» RE: Hmmm
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Hmmm...chilly yet?
Posted by: dangerouslysane
Comments are closed-
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 28, 2007 10:56 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Absurd. Cheney might be the Darth Vader of the White House cabal
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» This is indeed absurd.
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: This is indeed absurd.
Posted by: specom
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 12:10 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nor should we be fooled by his wife’s seemingly loving attitude towards little Samuel. Lynn Cheney is absolutely the last grandmother he deserves -- a rightwing clone of her heartless hubby.
In 1995, Mrs. Cheney founded the American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA), a conservative group that monitors American colleges and academia. A current member of ACTA's national council is archconservative Irving Kristol, father of Bill Kristol, founder of the rightwing subversive organization and prime instigator of Gulf War 2 -- Project for a New American Century (PNAC).
Not coincidentally two ACTA trustees are PNAC members: William Bennett (one of PNAC's 25 founders including Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Scooter Libby and UN Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad) and Martine Peretez.
Lynn Cheney is presently a senior fellow at the neocon front foundation, American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Other AEI scholars, past and present, include the following PNAC members:
John Bolton
Reuel Marc Gerecht, director of PNAC’s Iraq Initiative and former CIA Middle East specialist.
Newt Gingrich
Fred Kagan
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, PNAC founder.
Joshua Muravchik.
Richard Perle
Danielle Pletka, PNAC founder who claimed on C-SPAN that the neocon front organization wasn’t associated with AEI.
Other noteworthy AEI senior fellows include:
David Frum, author and former Bush 43 speechwriter.
Alan Keyes.
Christina Hoff Sommers, feminist movement critic and the author of Who Stole Feminism.
Fred Thompson.
John Yoo, university professor and former advisor in the Bush 43 Office of Legal Counsel who advocated torture of Gitmo detainess, to include crushing the testicles of teenaged combatants.
With a political background like Dick and Lynn Cheney's, I would suggest to Mary Cheney that family treatment in kind is worth considering. For the sake of her son's future mental health, she should completely disown his rightwing homophobic grandparents.
For AlterNet visitors unfamiliar with PNAC who desire more information, visit the non-profit investigative website, FreedomCentralUSA.com.
AlterNeters aware of PNAC will appreciate the website's alphabetical list of 225 members (called "signatories”), including Democrat hawks with liberal skins such as Bill Clinton's former Secretary of State Madeline Albright.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlemanintheboat on May 28, 2007 2:15 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a sperm donor...and one of my nightmares since
is my genetics becoming part of the spawn of satan's (spoken by an atheist)..one day the doorbell rings - 'ding dong!' hellooo papa..hissssssss!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It was David Crosby
Posted by: James T. Swaggart
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AFWXMAN on May 28, 2007 2:40 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Imagine my surprise
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir on May 28, 2007 4:22 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we reaching this hard for stories against the Rethugs? I mean, come on! These people are as crazy as a bag of ferrets! There's bigger fish to fry, I'm sure!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 4:40 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politician Faced Questions in Bookkeeping Scandal
By MARI YAMAGUCHI
AP
TOKYO (May 28) -- Japan's agriculture minister died Monday after hanging himself just hours before he was to face questioning in a political scandal, officials said, dealing a powerful blow to the increasingly beleaguered government ahead of July elections.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: slydad on May 28, 2007 4:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's next? Look at the way George Bush brushes his teeth . . . It's clearly a sign that he's a Jew hater from that. And what about the way Newt Gingrich combs his hair. Wow, he must really hate women. And what about the way Bill Clinton scratches his crotch . . . well, we all know what that means.
Get a life liberals!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's about a pattern of deceitful photo-ops Cheney uses to fool the American people. Or tries to.
Posted by: HughScott
» No it's not
Posted by: slydad
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: slydad
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: slydad
» RE: Is too!
Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: You gotta be kidding
Posted by: tweedster
» RE: You gotta be kidding
Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Learn how to punctuate this!
Posted by: slydad
» BTW - in response to another stupid question of yours.
Posted by: slydad
» RE: BTW - in response to another stupid question of yours.
Posted by: peacefullaim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on May 28, 2007 6:13 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A charitable organization based in Montgomery, Texas, and managed by Dr. Bob Meaders, Operation-Helmet supplies FREE helmet upgrade kits to troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as to those ordered to deploy in the near future.
Manufactured by Oregon Aero Inc, the helmet upgrades provide three primary things:
Protection : Shock-absorbing pads keep the helmet from slapping the skull when hit with blast forces, fragments, or being tumbled along the ground or inside a vehicle. This decreases the chance of brain injury from IED's, bombs, RPG's, vehicle accidents, falls, etc.
Comfort: A comfortable helmet will stay on a trooper's head longer and more often.
Stability: Keeps the helmet firmly on the head and out of the eyes.
As of today, 05-28-07, Operation Helmet had a waiting list of 215 names. Disgracefully for the world's richest nation, with special shame on President Bush and the Pentagon for doing nothing to end the shortage, it was due to inadequate contributions, not manufacturing problems.
NOTE: The U.S. Army has been supplying its combat units with less expensive liner pads made by a skateboard helmet company.
According to emails received by Operation-Helmet.org, the government-issued pads are hot, hard and uncomfortable. Some GIs are removing the pads and pounding them with a hammer to make the material softer and more wearable, which reduces protection against explosions.
Because the DOD has refused to promote Operation-Helmet.org, some GIs in the Middle East don't know the improved Oregon Aero pad system exists, despite publicity generated by the famous singer rock star, Cher. Our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan deserve the BEST equipment available, not the cheapest.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» "You go to war with Army you have, not what you want"
Posted by: CatDad
» Giving our troops the best helmet liners available is about SAVING THER LIVES, you idiot!
Posted by: HughScott
» RE: Giving our troops the best helmet liners available is about SAVING THER LIVES, you idiot!
Posted by: dangerouslysane
» Thanks, dangerouslysane, I can't believe hateful so-called antiwar people can be.
Posted by: HughScott
» RE:
Posted by: CatDad
» ME a "Bush supporter"? Obviously, CatDad, you have NEVER visited my King-George.biz website.
Posted by: HughScott
» Is this an Ad??
Posted by: gellero
» The Operation-Helmet.org website will answer your questions and eliminate your skepticism.
Posted by: HughScott
» And your claims of superiority are full? Of what?
Posted by: Beck
» I'm a Vietnam vet, m'am. Take your pompous, Bush-loving, OOO-RAH bullshit and shove it!
Posted by: HughScott
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gellero on May 28, 2007 9:11 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It's a selfish act to bring any child into the world
Posted by: Beck
» ?????
Posted by: gellero
Comments are closed-
Posted by: YogiBear on May 28, 2007 10:34 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billlies on May 28, 2007 10:40 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for the war. It's Hillary Clintons', John Edwards' John Kerrys' etc., as much as it is Cheneys'. Cheney didn't vote for the war. They did. As Cindy Sheanen notes, the left used her when they had no power. Now, they role over.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Dick Cheney, roll model
Posted by: YogiBear
» In This Instance
Posted by: gellero
» RE: In This Instance
Posted by: tweedster
» He is a good role model, I suppose, for his own gay daughter. It's all the other gay children. .
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SJR505 on May 29, 2007 4:51 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My gut feelings is that the supreme being is rewarding "cheney' in his own way to saddle him with the glaring evil of what he , cheney, has made the American familes suffer for loss of our warriors...It is a glaring abomnimation of cheney and his family in full view of the world...
It could be worse, cheny having a heart attack, cancer or his daugher, grandchild having HIV which may still occur, or whatever could befall an evil man of cheney's reputation...Your guess is as good as mine...Man , the blood he and Bush "The Weasel" have on their hands could flood the Amazon River and fill the "The Lake of Fire"...
S. JIM RODRIGUEZ+ECLECTICIST SPIRIT SEEKER+
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chief of okeefe on May 29, 2007 6:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Put him in the picture too!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redheadeddude on Jun 23, 2007 3:02 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: redheadeddude on Jun 23, 2007 3:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped
California Carbon Trading Allows Timber Companies to Sell CO2 Credits for Their Worst Logging Practices
How to Answer the Dumb Things Climate Deniers Say




