Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Loneliness of the Abortion Patient

By Carole Joffe and Kate Cosby, AlterNet. Posted May 26, 2007.


Rather than expressing solidarity with others experiencing unwanted pregnancies, many abortion patients take pains to distinguish themselves as different from other women getting abortions.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Carole Joffe Kate Cosby

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"I think that people should be held accountable for their actions and a lot of times it's the convenience of the situation that makes it easy ... to get an abortion, and if I wasn't the person that I was, I mean this would be real easy for me, just real simple. ..."

Jessie is a 23-year-old woman, the mother of two children, having her third abortion. Her comments are drawn from a small interview study (16 women interviewed thus far) we are conducting to understand the impact of state-imposed regulations on women having abortions in two highly regulated states. In our talks with Jessie and other women, we uncovered a striking sense of isolation among many abortion patients. Rather than expressing solidarity with others experiencing unwanted pregnancies, nearly all our respondents took pains to distinguish themselves as different from other women getting abortions.

Though there were some expressions of sympathy, we also heard disparaging remarks about women who were too careless about contraception and were obtaining abortions too "easily." "I am a Christian; I am not doing this casually," one woman said, with the clear suggestion that others in the waiting room were not so thoughtful or moral. Perhaps the starkest example of isolation came in one woman's response to the question of whether she would "ever consider being part of a group that supports people who get abortions?" Her answer was an emphatic "no!" As she put it, "I wouldn't support them (other abortion recipients) because ... it [might become] a habit for everyone." The speaker was a 20-year-old mother of one, who was about to have her second abortion.

The situation we describe is very different from the one that existed in the United States in the 1970s, around the time of legalization of abortion. Then, many women seeking abortions felt part of a larger movement. "Second wave" feminism was flourishing and women's health issues were a central focus of the movement. People still had fresh memories of when abortion was illegal, and thousands of women died and many more were injured from unsafe abortions. Rather than being ashamed, many abortion patients of the pre-Roe v. Wade era recall feeling entitled to having this once dangerous procedure done in a professional and women-centered setting.

The new occupation of "abortion counselor" was established in this period -- someone who explained the procedure to the patient and accompanied her throughout her stay at the clinic. Feminist health activists pressured the newly established clinics to keep prices low and to make sure doctors were sufficiently respectful to their patients. In short, for many patients in the early years of legal abortion, the experience was both "personal and political," in that there were constant reminders that this medical procedure was tied to a larger movement. In contrast, in many of today's clinics, the staff is so busy complying with state-imposed "informed consent" requirements, which often involve telling patients downright lies -- for example, the supposed link between abortion and breast cancer and other distortions of risks of the procedure -- that there is rarely the opportunity to impart a positive political message about reproductive justice.

We are not suggesting that there no longer exists a movement for abortion rights. Today, there continues to be an extremely hardworking, multifaceted "reproductive justice" movement, as it is often now referred to. There are dedicated healthcare providers who resolutely go forth each day to provide abortion care, often risking their personal safety. There are lawyers who work tirelessly to stem the tide against the various restrictions imposed by anti-abortion politicians and by the Supreme Court ( as in the recent egregious case, Gonzales v. Carhart, which banned a type of abortion that is sometimes medically necessary to care for women in the second trimester of pregnancy, and which imposes stiff criminal and civil penalties for providers who perform the procedure). There are advocates who engage in crucial activities, ranging from raising money to help low-income women obtain abortions, to organizing political campaigns, such as the recently successful one in South Dakota, in which voters defeated a measure to ban nearly all abortions.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: abortion

Carole Joffe and Kate Cosby are both researchers with the Advancing New Standards for Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) program at the Bixby Center for Reproductive Health Research and Policy at the University of California, San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lowering the cost of living
Posted by: Logic's Edge on May 26, 2007 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could launch into a rant about personal responsibility and the like, but why bother.

If I had sufficient rank in the government, I'd launch some major campaigns to lower the cost of living. For example:

- New construction techniques to slash the cost of building a house, both labor and materials.

- Solar power on every roof to eliminate electrical bills.

- A conversion program to make cars electric and encourage manufacture, to eliminate reliance on gasoline and much of the maintenance costs.

Lowering the cost of living is the best approach to helping those in poverty because it helps society as a whole. Not raising taxes for social programs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lowering the cost of living Posted by: skewitall
» RE: Lowering the cost of living Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Lowering the cost of living Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Lowering the cost of living Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: Lowering the cost of living Posted by: judithkrain
» Inequality Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Lowering the cost of living Posted by: Logic's Edge
It is the poor
Posted by: algodees on May 26, 2007 2:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
women only that are stigmatized by abortion. The wealthy women of this country can have their abortions more discreetly than the poor mothers can. Banning abortion really means banning it only for the poor. Wealthy women will always be able to get an abortion. Why shouldn't all American women have the same right? This is a women's issue and should be decided by the individual woman only. Women shouldn't have to feel shame and loneliness at such a stressful time in their lives. It is a time when they need all the support they can get and to stigmatize these poor women is disgraceful. Is there no compassion left?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It is the poor Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: babaloo
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: MAD
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: Judithica
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: Arlene
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: DooDah
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: ohb0b
» RE: It is the poor Posted by: AFWXMAN
Guilt
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 26, 2007 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However much the anti-abortion freaks try to dramatize, demonize and oversimplify everything, it still can't be easy for an individual mother to get rid of her baby. If you had to do the same with your baby, would some kind of feminist solidarity really ease your pain? More likely, I think the motherly instinct would kick in, and guilt and ambivalence would be common.

As for projecting ones guilt onto others, and pretending your case is different and morally superior, this is just human nature. I'm sure lots of defense mechanisms and rationalizations kick in when you are in a vulnerable and emotional state.

All the adrenaline and solidarity of the feminist thing may have helped back in the early 70s. But you can't really expect that rush to last forever. Eventually the reality of your personal situation has to kick in. And I'd imagine it did for lots of women back then who got abortions, and found it wasn't the liberating experience it was cracked up to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Guilt fantasies Posted by: babaloo
» RE: Guilt Posted by: JCrowe
» RE: Guilt is religiously-induced Posted by: choice joyce
Personal Responsibility???
Posted by: frosty86 on May 26, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that when a woman have an abortion, particularly her 2nd or 3rd abortion, people make snide remarks about "personal responsibility"? Especially after reading an article in which the authors point out the poor availability of contraceptives and the barriers and stigma faced by women seeking abortions. It boggles the mind.

If she's having an abortion, she's determined that she doesn't want children or isn't ready for children, and she's made a decision for herself. It's really disgusting that people can pretend they know what the "responsible" thing is for her to do. Given that we live in a rape culture where many women have little control over their sexuality (or contraceptive use), and given the uneven availability of contraceptives, and given the pathetic state of sex education...why do people continue to blame women for not being "responsible"? It's just another way for people to reinforce that women are irrational, unresponsible, overly emotional people who deserve inferior healthcare and discrimination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: SekhmetsatRa
» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Personal Responsibility??? Posted by: Logic's Edge
if things are bad now...
Posted by: frosty86 on May 26, 2007 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but were pretty good back then, let's just blame feminists

I've noticed a pattern where people like to blame things on feminists and feminist movement. After all, it couldn't have anything to do with the backlash against feminism or with conservatives and liberals who continue to militarize women's lives and slash social programs that help women. Nope, clearly it's the big bad feminists who have made life bad for women!

And for the record, I don't know many feminists, past or present who said the abortion "experience" would be liberating. They did, however, say that being in control of one's body is liberating, and it most certainly is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» militarize women's lives? Posted by: MartianBachelor
Why do we assume that the women in this essay were "irresponsible".....
Posted by: mjabele on May 26, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.....when, in point of fact, there are only two methods of contraception available "over the counter", so to speak - condoms and "abstention" - both which clearly require the cooperation of the male partner?

As an internist and HIV specialist working at an inner city clinic, part of my job involves counseling patients about the importance of protection during sexual encounters - not so much to avoid pregnancy, but rather to avoid transmission of the HIV virus. Nonetheless, I'm struck by the number of women who tell me that their partners refuse to use condoms, generally for reasons having to do with personal gratification. This phenomenon seems far from uncommon even in relationships where the partners (ostensibly) love each other, and even in circumstances where the woman is seropositive and the male partner seronegative. Who is being irresponsible here?

Before we criticize women who become repeatedly pregnant as being "irresponsible", we need to take a good hard look at whether these women have access to methods of birth control that THEY can exclusively control, rather than depending on the cooperation of their male partners. And, though I don't really agree with frosty's comment that we live in a "rape culture", we should also acknowledge that there remains a subtle but persistent inequality of power in many consensual sexual relationships in our culture, and that women are typically the "disempowered" individuals in such situations.

During the year I worked in Malawi, I saw this sort of disempowerment of women in sexual relationships everywhere, and simply assumed it was part of the culture there (which, in point of fact, it is). But I was surprised to see, after I came back to the US, that it's also quite common here.

Prescription of birth control needs to be readily and freely available to all women, and women need to feel comfortable and secure in the knowledge that they can access such methods without endangering their relationship with a male partner, before we jump to the conclusion that women such as those in the article are simply being "irresponsible" in their reproductive behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abortion should be safe and legal---BUT-
Posted by: WitchyNy on May 26, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women have the right to make their own hard choices.
Should abortion be a hard choice? Absolutely. If nothing else, it should be that.

How many women abort due to poverty? In Australia-mothers are supported by the government if they divorce with two or more children....Australia WANTS more children. In Canada children are supported by the government..both countries have called for their women to have MORE children.

But here-we have a Democrat approved 93 BILLION dollar war to support.
Who has time/money to have children?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Abortion morphs into politics.. Posted by: zipper696
LOOK WHO'S GETTING PUSHED AROUND AGAIN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 26, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most women caught in the abortion fight are poor. They are not making a selfish decision. It's a necessary one. Degrading them serves no purpose except to assert one's own superiority. So "abortion counsellors" and motivational speakers, go get a real job. Most of you have had abortions of your own. Get off your high horse and do something useful. These young women need someone's hand to hold, not demeaning lectures. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outlaw All Abortions ...
Posted by: terradea on May 26, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... But only after both of the following hypotheticals are achieved:

1. Accidental pregnancy is not longer feasible (contraception is free, available to all and fool-proof);

2. The embryo or fetus can be removed from a woman who might die otherwise and gestated in someone else's body (pro-lifers (men included), perhaps?).


How dare any of you pro-lifers (or pro-life sympathizers) talk about what a woman should or should not be able to do with her own body? Shame on you. That's even against the christian religion (judge not; free will; let god decide; remove the board in your own eye; cast the first stone, etc.) - pro-lifers are nothing but hypocrites. Life may be sacred, but a woman's life is more sacred than that of an unborn, and until everyone understands that, women in this country are in danger of losing their status as individuals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Outlaw All Abortions ... Posted by: banshee413
simple solutions impossible
Posted by: wmoss2 on May 26, 2007 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For whatever reason I feel compelled to write a post for this article (after reading many similar pieces). This argument rages on and on and it is such a damned pain. The only universal theme I find in this whole debate, is the high level of ugliness that can be exhibited by both sides.

In University I took a trip to DC with other students to attend a N.O.W rally in support of abortion rights. Before then, my global attitude was that abortion rights were a civil rights issue...simple. At the event I was shocked by the "dark energy" in the air. The people I were with were quite awful: calling fetuses "tumors, boils, pimples, parasites...etc."...it was pretty horrible. I saw many of the pro-life crowd throwing out awful words like "whore, sinner, murderer, etc.". I came out of that event with a changed attitude about the whole matter.

In my opinion, abortion is too complicated an issue for a simple resolution. Every individual case has unique circumstances, and should be judged on that basis. I don't like that idea that abortion is always okay or always evil. There has to be some way that people can apply some reason here.

The basic issues here: individual freedom, individual responsibility, social responsibility (and ethics), the value of life and practical economic issues. Of these, the one I think the most about is the value of life. I think this is the most contentious issue here. How does a person value life and how do they build a "hierarchy of living beings"?

I believe that most people value life proportionate to how similar that life is to one's self. So, we have people who refuse to eat anything "with a face", oppose the fur trade, oppose testing on (cute) animals, etc., while killing veggies, bacteria and viruses is just fine. We all do this, but to varying degrees. In the same way, I think this debate is occurring because of differing ideas about how to define this hierarchy for human life.

Many people are uncomfortable even trying to establish hierarchy of life for people. Some see all human life as precious (recall that whole Terry Schiavo affair) while others value human life based on some set of criteria: eugenicists, racial supremacists and pro-choice people. Pro-choice people put the fetus (or perhaps embryo) below the adult in the hierarchy of life; I suppose because it is so unlike us. The fetus has less brain-power, can't talk and looks "weird", so it is of less value. But this strikes me as being a bit artificial (almost as much as saying a retarded person or a black person is less valuable than a healthy white or Asian).

That being said, I still think this procedure is necessary and should be available and safe to women. However, I don't think it is reasonable to expect that people should consider it to be "just fine" and "not a big deal". I also think it unreasonable to expect that everyone should be non-judgmental towards women who have abortions. I think most sane people value life to some degree and abhor its destruction; abortion ends a life. How serious we feel about it, depends a lot on our personal life hierarchy and the exact circumstances that lead to the abortion in question.

Try to see the other side's point of view I guess. To use a small example, I don't agree with vegans, but I respect that they value animal life much higher than I do, and I accept that they may have a valid point. I try to be civil when I meet these people and to understand their point of view.

If any progress is possible (ands sometimes I really wonder about this...) on the abortion issue we should try to be civil and accept that we all have somewhat different scales for weighing life. Respect and reason should win the day...I hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apparently, only middle-class women can have sex
Posted by: frosty86 on May 26, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Says one commenter:
"Women shouldn't have sex if they cannot afford contraception and don't want a baby."

If they do, apparently they are bad people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best decision ever made
Posted by: jackie on May 26, 2007 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not one of the women I know who has had an abortion feels regret, shame or sadness. Most think it was one of the best decisions they have ever made. The unplanned pregnancy causes more women to feel shame or sadness, not the abortion. I am so sick of the right wing getting into the minds of the rest of us with their propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We should applaud these women for DOING THE RIGHT THING
Posted by: janvdb on May 26, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poor women who have children they cannot afford create the underclass. Their children have far higher rates of drop-out, early pregnancy, crime, unemployment and other unsuccessful outcomes. These unwanted, unplanned, unfathered, disadvantaged children grow up to fill our prisons.

When poor women take this impending situation seriously and RESPONSIBLY make the hard decision to abort children who would have been born into bad situations, they are DOING US ALL A BIG FAVOR.

They are doing the right thing and we should all express our appreciation to them.

Sure, they should have been more careful about birth control. But, 40% of US abortions are to women who were using birth control when they got pregnant. No one did anything "irresponsible" at all. They used birth control just like they were supposed to but they got pregnant anyway.

Those who weren't using birth control should have been using it, sure. But errors shouldn't be a reason for damning people to a lifetime of struggle and failure. People must be allowed to recover from errors or we will all end up living with the consequences of forcing people into failure. Missing one pill can result in a pregnancy. Good, responsible women make these mistakes, which seem minor at the time. Women succumb to pressure from men for unprotected sex. Mistakes happen.

Grow up and face reality. Mistakes happen. Responsible people deal with these mistakes early on so they don't snowball into major disasters.

Women who stand up, step up to the plate, correctly analyze the situation, take up the burden of guilt and crap dished out by people who like to see women broke and dependent -- women who go ahead and abort unwanted children should BE APPLAUDED. They are doing the unpleasant, but necessary, thing which protects all of us from the messes those unwanted children are highly likely to create in our streets and jails.

These women are DOING THE RIGHT THING.

The IRRESPONSIBLE women are those who fail to take this hard step, who let things slide, who let "nature take its course," who can't deal with reality, who don't mind messy, failed lives and who ultimately bear unplanned, unwanted, unfathered, unfunded, poorly-timed children -- children who are highly likely to do poorly in life.

We need to recognize that mistakes are made in failing to prevent pregnancy BY BOTH SEXES and the women who respond responsibly to these unfortuante situations by taking the difficult but necessary steps to prevent unwanted births are the RESPONSIBLE ones.

Women who bear children they don't want, can't afford, won't raise well, who have no fathers, who are born with three strikes against them, who end up dropping out of school, committing crimes and filling out jails -- these are the women we should be stigmatizing as irresponsible.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

control of your body
Posted by: mtnprivy on May 26, 2007 2:55 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I were to espouse a belief that those who are my dependants are my (financial) body, and therefore I could terminate them if it was convenient to do so, then that would be consistent with the idea of "control of my body."
By it's very nature, abortion is the use of deadly force against another human(who did not choose to be there), to impose your own will against one who is NOT YOU. Ask any expectant mother if that is "herself" inside her, and you will get a strong response. They know very well this is another person! Ask them if the violent termination of that "fetus" by an outsider should warrent a "murder" charge, and they will have equally strong feelings!
There is no doubt in my mind that abortion changes a woman's life forever. How can a woman think of herself the same after that experience? Many of them come to resent the provider who made it so easy to go thru without even a moment's pause for reflection. This idea has been expressed to me multiple times.
I was not raised in great wealth, and find the ease with which money is used to justify such an act as a sad statement about the pervasiveness of greed(ease of living). The material world that I was born into would have caused more than half of today's women to abort me immediately. I am so glad that my mother was able to see that I was an individual in my own right, and NOT HER. Perhaps women who cannot understand that this new life is NOT YOU should not raise children at all, but at least they could be adopted to another woman who could undertand and respect this new person.
Please don't act like the pro-abortion crowd is the true "live and let live" crowd, nothing could be more false. Having said that, I don't like the fact that so many "pro-lifers" are pro military, and for that matter, so many of us are pro-consumers(wasters) of the earth's limited resources. I like to live simply, so that others may simply live. Seems like we could all spend less time calling eachother names, distorting the facts, and more time trying to make the world a better place for us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: control of your body Posted by: banshee413
» RE: control of your body Posted by: Gisele
» RE: control of your body Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: control of your body Posted by: peacefullaim
`hurray for eugenics
Posted by: mtnprivy on May 26, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your idea about the underclass is not new at all. Perhaps you should google the term "eugenics" and see what you come up with. Check back in and tell us what you have learned. That would be quite a lesson for us all.
If we do not learn from our (civilizations) mistakes, we are bound to repeat them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: `hurray for eugenics Posted by: Logic's Edge
These Women Don't Surprise Me At All
Posted by: Jamila Akil on May 26, 2007 3:28 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From my experience it is often the women who are on their 2nd, 3rd, 4th or more abortion who like to think of themselves as "different" from the other women who are getting abortions. It's an attitude of "I need my abortion, but those other women are just irresponsible."

I think that someone needs to explain to these women that they are no better or worse than any other woman, despite the fact that they want to believe differently to avoid feeling bad about themselves.

The pro-choice movement has a lot of work to do about stripping the stigma from abortion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A One-Sided Topic...
Posted by: Gisele on May 26, 2007 3:38 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that is actually two - three if you're a Christian, and four if you're logical. Logic tells me that the "fetus" is actually a human being, because it simply cannot be anything else if left to grow. Fetus seems to be a word whose popularity has exploded since the '70's..it makes it easier to convince ourselves that what we're doing has no consequence.

That church going folk are using the services of abortion providers in such large numbers ought to be rather surprising. They would know that God holds the lives of the unborn in high esteem, to the degree that if a man were to hit a pregnant woman and she lose her child - the man was to be put to death.

But the ones that really piss me off on this topic are men, for a number of reasons.
"Keep your legs closed if you're not willing to take responsibility."
Let's do that ladies! Men seem to want to make the issue of abortion just one more of women's many sexual responsibilities - so let's look on it as a strength, not a burden. Rape is the only scenario where we truly don't have control of sex, the rest of the time we do - use it. Keep your legs closed until his eyes bug out, and he's willing to sign a statement saying he will take full responsibility for the child he may be helping to create. Responsibility for life.
"...if the woman is not using contraception,"
Guys, this is NOT just a woman's responsibility, it's yours. 100% of the time! If you need help Google "male contraception"...you'll find all kinds of info there. Including a real nifty shot that lasts for up to 10 years. Couple that with a condom and you're not likely to contribute to the population explosion. How many of you would be willing to take that step? A little worried about side effects maybe? Don't worry, it's not hormonally based so some of the nasty side effects we've had to deal with over the years won't affect you.
"..why should I support something I don't want,"
If you're willing to risk helping to create life, you better be willing to raise a child to adulthood. Or keep your pecker in your pants.

Instead of taking a life, let's put 50% of the responsibility where it actually lays - on Daddy. NAME him on the birth registration! When a man is sure that his name will be shown for all to see, and responsibility for his act will come home to roost - he's more likely to think twice about just how badly he really wants sex.

INTERVIEW FIRST! Ask him what his views on parenthood and abortion are - BEFORE you give yourself! If he's all for abortion in a country that's trying to ban it, why on earth would you even consider going to bed with him? "Well, if I don't then he'll walk," I've actually heard that one before...let him walk! Why saddle yourself with that kind of baggage? More than that, he's telling you he doesn't give a damn about you.

If a man wants to give you full responsibility for the sexual act - take it - Keep Your Legs Closed. Go buy a few sex toys you'll learn more about what you like, and unwanted pregnancy won't be an issue. On the brighter side you won't be contributing to an already over populated planet, you won't be creating canon fodder for future president's to use when they have a fart crosswise...and you'll be contributing to the economy. Even better than that you'll be helping men do something they avoid - taking responsibility for their own actions. Something few men do without being forced to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: frosty86
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: thha
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: Gisele
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: judithkrain
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: Gisele
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: progressivevoice
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: Gisele
» RE: A One-Sided Topic... Posted by: peacefullaim
Hold Fundamentalists Responsible
Posted by: Urstrly on May 26, 2007 7:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not just that feminists are unable to support every woman who has an abortion, keep in mind that the religious right has been on a moral crusade to stigmatize women who have abortions. No wonder women having abortions are reluctant to identify with "those women" who televangelists label as whores, sluts and worse. There is, of course, a huge array of reasons why women choose abortion, but rarely in my experience is it that they're carelessly promiscuous. And even if they are, I have never understood why anyone would want a woman to bear a child she cannot support emotionally and/or financially. We have to find a God who shows as much compassion for a woman with an unwanted pregnancy as for the fetus she carries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Birth control....it's cheaper than cell phones, satelite dishes.....
Posted by: Poe on May 27, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.......240 cable stations and all that bling.....but apparently birth control isn't the poor mans' thing.

I think we all have reproductive rights and with those reproductive rights come responsibilities. Both partners in a relationship, whether a one night stand or long term, need to be concerned about STD's, pregnancy and of course AIDS.
This doesn't seem to be of any concern, though, in America's inner cities. There are absolutely no valid excuses to engage in unprotected sex....none! Condoms are as readily available and cheap as candy in any supermarket, corner store, pharmacy or Planned Parenthood.

If you choose to engage in unprotected sex, and have no interest in bringing children into the world, then as far as I'm concerned, whatever the consequences, you are throwing your reproductive rights to the wind!

Society should always be there to help those in need, and I have no problem with our tax dollars, 60 hours a week's worth, helping the truly needy. But what I see happening, particularly in our inner cities, is hard earned money helping to support an irresponsible lifestyle. Young men who choose not to use a condom and young women who choose these young men. The end result....abortions used as birth control, or unwanted children being raised in broken homes with one parent too young to handle the responsibilities of parenting, and another parent.....well...pretty much non existent.

So young women in the inner city, with their whole life in front of them, throw it all away. By the time they're 25, they're uneducated, unskilled and burdened with raising one, two, three or four children alone.....which is pretty much impossible. Instead of being a teacher, she's a teacher's aide....instead of being a nurse, she's a nurse's aide....instead of a job in management, she's a cashier.
Jobs that were never meant to help raise a family.

Certainly abortion should remain a legal and safe procedure for all of the obvious reasons.

But, in a normal consensual relationship or "one night stand", there is no excuse for unprotected sex!!

Poe

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

abortion IS a type of contraception
Posted by: frosty86 on May 27, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so those of you who keep saying "I support abortion, unless people use it as a form of contraception" aren't making a whole lot of sense.

are you willing to federally subsidize condoms, birth control pills, daycare centers, and research on safe and more reliable forms of contraception?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well..... Posted by: mjabele
The future belongs to the nation that can control its population size.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 27, 2007 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hear the Chinese are having civil disturbances over their one child per family policy.

In time, the people will find that small families can be accommodated. But that's a major life change. I cannot imagine it, myself. But I am envious that they are learning while we are not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Women who ALWAYS use birth control have abortions too!
Posted by: Pittsburgher on May 27, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no 100% effective methods of birth control. I suppose a hysterectomy would be, but that does seem a bit excessive. Abstinence does not preclude rape; "the pill", while quite effective for women who both medically and financially can take it, is also not 100% effective. Remember when the sponge was introduced, and it turned out that it was only half as effective on women who had previously had children as on women who had never had children? Unfortunately, that information only became known several months after its release, I believe, which was a bit too late for at least one woman I knew.

While I am certainly not in favor of women having abortions, and I do not believe that anyone would prefer that scenario, it is appalling to read of people judging other's lives. How presumptuous to think that one would know how one would behave with someone else's upbringing, education, financial status and general life situation. Not everyone can stroll off to the corner drugstore and plunk down their AmEx card to buy some condoms; there are more people in this country than some of you might think who must travel for 45 minutes to the grocery store, after they have found someone with a car to take them, and for whom it might well be a choice between buying condoms and three days worth of rice and macaroni and cheese to eat. I will assume that everyone discussing what others should do have never ridden in a car without a seat belt, never ridden a bicycle without a helmet, and not even once had sex without a condom. Or have they done those things and been lucky enough to emerge unscathed, and feel comfortable in sitting around judging what others with worse luck should do?

I would like to mention just in case it might be helpful to anyone that spermicides are reasonably inexpensive, available OTC, and should be acceptable to men who will not use condoms. They are not as effective as some other methods but are certainly better than crossing one's fingers and hoping for the best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cognitive Dissonance
Posted by: fork on May 27, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Her comments are drawn from a small interview study (16 women interviewed thus far) . . . Rather than expressing solidarity with others experiencing unwanted pregnancies, nearly all our respondents took pains to distinguish themselves as different from other women getting abortions."

I hope this study is continued so that we can see how prevalent this view is, where people can rationalize abortion, but only for themselves. It certainly gives an interesting perspective on anti-choicers, particularly those who would never be in a position to require an abortion. An extensive investigation into this phenomenon would give us an idea of how many of those spouting "personal responsibility" and "killing babies" would, in all likelihood, consider an abortion themselves.

The Only Moral Abortion is My Abortion

Not that I think these kinds of people are all intentionally and/or maliciously hypocritical, because we all harbour incompatible positions on one issue or another, but only by understanding how this occurs and how to influence it, can we begin to change hearts and minds. If most people find abortion acceptable (even if only for themselves), how can we harness this and extend this acceptance into empathy for others that find themselves in need of an abortion (especially since empathy is the basic tenet of most religions and belief systems - "The Golden Rule")?

From a Globe and Mail article, Saturday, May 26, 2007:
"One of the world's leading neuroscientists, Dr. Vilanayur S. Ramachandran, has written, "Our mental life is governed mainly by a cauldron of emotions, motives and desires which we are barely conscious of, and what we call our conscious life is usually an elaborate post hoc rationalization of things we really do for other reasons."
There are other mental structures that govern feelings and emotions, and these structures have a greater impact on decision making than logic or reason. . .
Neurologists and brain researchers have describe how disturbing images go straight to a part of the brain that is not mediated by language or reasoned analysis . . ."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

60% of women who get abortions are mothers
Posted by: Calicat on May 27, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most women who have abortions are not teenagers. The majority already have at least one child. Birth control is not infallible. Nor are people! But women who have abortions are trying to do the right thing -- for their futures and the futures of the children they already have. Nobody benefits when women are overwhelmed with kids they can't raise well.
For every woman who has an abortion there is a man who made her pregnant. Let's just keep that in mind when we go on about responsibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Until Men Bear Their Fair Share of Responsibility and Shame...
Posted by: papillion on May 27, 2007 2:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and divorce notions of sex and control, abortion will always be contentious! Women must be vigilant to preserve this right.

My story?

I've had two abortions due to love, control and betrayal bordering on abuse.
A woman with a college degree, a great job, good family etc., I started h