comments_image -

Sex, Lies & Global Warming

Sara Whitman: ExxonMobil continues to discriminate against sexual orientation in their hiring policy in spite of shareholder objections.
May 22, 2007  |  
 
Advertisement
 

This post originally appeared on The Huffington Post

On May 30th, at its annual meeting, the directors of ExxonMobil will ignore the shareholder request to change its employment policy to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation.

They promise they are doing the right thing without any added rules.

They also have promised for years that global warming is the machination of crazy scientists out of touch with reality. They have lobbied hard --and successfully-- against the U.S. signing the Kyoto Protocol. Rules. Why have rules when there is 40 billion dollars of profit to be had?

This February, The New York Times reported CEO Rex Tillerson, "warned Tuesday that governments should not rush into policies that could damage the global economy in order to limit carbon emissions."

Maybe when Rex can chip off some iceberg for his martini from his deck in West Palm Beach he might think stepping up efforts will be a good idea.

Over 85 percent of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have 98 percent of Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human Rights Campaign. And yet, ever the spoiled child, ExxonMobil continues to claim their policies, without the explicit language, are good enough.

Former CEO Lee Raymond was the poster child for aggressive, antagonistic business practices with a complete disregard for anyone and anything except the carefully watched bottom line. The man felt humiliating shareholders at the annual meeting was not only completely acceptable but his right. Call me a pessimist, but I don't believe it was the kind of leadership that inspires respect in the workplace.

Oddly, before the merger of Exxon and Mobil in 1998, Mobil did, in fact, have a non-discrimination policy that included sexual orientation. Unlike the merger of Lotus and IBM, where IBM embraced the policies of the smaller, more progressive company, Exxon removed the policy.

If, as the company claims in its proxy response, "ExxonMobil's existing global policies prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in any Company workplace, anywhere in the world," why the opposition?

Even though Raymond is gone and a smoother, more polished Tillerson has taken over, the rhetoric is pretty much the same. While Raymond was famous for his sneering, vocal disregard of the rest of the world, Tillerson is saying all the same things.

Only in a much nicer suit.

Tillerson claims to accept the planet is warming, maybe a little tiny bit, his company is completely and exclusively invested in continuing to pump as much oil from the earth as possible. No need for rules and regulations -- they hurt profits and you know 40 billion isn't quite enough to cover his latest salary increase.

No need to add those pesky extra words to the EEO policy. Why subject yourself to possible litigation? God knows the legal department's hands are full enough trying to avoid paying out a single penny for the Valdez settlement.

Next Wednesday, Tillerson and the board of directors will ignore 15 of the 17 resolutions brought before them. With million dollar smiles, they'll promise to do the right thing.

And insist there is no need for rules, standards or evaluation.

It is a fact that ExxonMobil removed existing protections for gay and lesbian employees of the Mobil Corporation. Enough with the song and dance. Stop with the lies and misinformation.

Change the policy.

Sara Whitman is working on a book of photography and essays reflecting life as a lesbian mom. She posts daily in her own blog, Suburblezmom, which features photos, insane rants and comical revelations about everyday life.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: discrimination, gay rights, exxonmobil
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]