Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Insanity of the U.S. Embargo on Cuba

By Nathaniel Hoffman, AlterNet. Posted May 23, 2007.


A growing group of American activists and politicians are on a mission to end our Cold War-era embargo on Cuba. They believe that business, not isolation, is a better way to change governments.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Nathaniel Hoffman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

A longer version of this story first appeared in the Boise Weekly.

"Don" Albert Fox, a stocky Floridian who talks in a hushed, confidential tone, has his own custom cigar bands and a retired master cigar roller in Havana who keeps him well stocked.

The tiny labels contain a Cuban flag and an American flag, representing the friendships that Albert A. Fox, Jr. has been carefully nurturing since about 2000.

In the late 1990s Fox tried to take his aging mother to Cuba, her birthplace. The U.S. government denied them permission to travel there.

Since that first denial, the Tampa political operative has been to Cuba more than 60 times. He's met with President Fidel Castro on nine of those visits and has contacts at many levels within the Cuban government.

And he knows his cigars.

Fox fancies Cuban shirts, because they have more pockets. To hold cigars. Every time I saw him, he had fat ones, long ones, sweet and smelly ones sticking out of every pocket. He handed them out everywhere. Slipping one from a pocket, his head bowed, he offered them slightly concealed.

"You smoke cigars?" he growled.

Occasionally he had one in his mouth. A glass of Bucanero, the best Cuban beer, in one hand.

Fox is among a small but growing clique of activists in the United States who are on a mission to end our Cold War-era embargo on the Communist-run nation just 90 miles off the coast of Florida.

Their foot soldiers include U.S. politicians like Idaho Gov. C. L. "Butch" Otter, the most recent in a string of state officials who have visited Cuba on what are generally billed as trade missions.

"They've gone to Cuba to sell grain, and then once they're there, they see that we're in the middle of one of the biggest foreign policy screw-ups in our history," said Phil Peters, an expert on Cuba at the Lexington Institute, a free-market think tank in Washington, D.C.

Otter first visited Cuba in March 2003 with the Lexington Institute as a congressman. I traveled to Cuba in April to cover the Idaho governor's fourth trip to the island.

"We're doing the exact same things that we did in the '50s when we cut Cuba off and threw them into the arms of the Russians," Otter told me, riding in the front of an air-conditioned Havanatur bus. "We're isolating ourselves from them, we're not talking, we're not doing business deals, we're not exchanging products, thereby exchanging values. We don't have to agree with everything they do. But understand it."

Cuba is not an easy place to understand.

A recent story in the Miami Herald, citing a dozen people in positions to know, asserted that Washington "is now largely ignorant of what is happening within the inner circles in Havana as Cuba undergoes a transfer of power" from Fidel Castro to his brother Raul.

And as I prepared for my recent trip, I got a not-so-subtle message that Cuban spin doctors are weary of Norteamericano reporters coming down to the island to speculate on the impending implosion of Caribbean Socialism.

The question often asked is, what will happen when Cuba opens up? But the growing coalition of Congressional bedfellows who oppose the embargo, like to remind us that it is not Cuba that is closed. It is the United States.

WHAT KIND OF TANK?

On my last night in Cuba, an older European woman who has lived there most of her life asked me about think tanks.

She wanted to know if it was "tank" as in fish tank or as in army tank.

I was momentarily stumped.

Is the growing support in places like Idaho for normalized relations with Cuba a result of thoughtful humanitarian motivations (aquarium) or an imperialistic bent (M1 Abrams)?

Folks like Peters at the Lexington Institute and libertarian-minded politicos like the Idaho governor are not exactly the type of people you'd expect to be doing the bidding of socialist stalwarts like Fidel Castro. Not if there isn't anything in it for them, or at least for the economy.

"I'm not a fan of Communism at all," Peters told me. "I would hope that the Cubans could find their own way toward a more open society with political and economic freedom."

Idaho's Governor Otter, who sold french fries all over the world for Simplot International before entering the political sphere, is no fan of Communism either.

But he believes that business is a better way to change governments than isolation.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: al fox, foreign policy, embargo, cuba

Nathaniel is an independent reporter in Boise, Idaho. For more stories on Cuba, visitwww.xutos.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Take a good look at Castro
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 23, 2007 1:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean, really! When it comes to ruthless thugs, Castro isn't even in the same league with some of the people we've had to deal with in the last forty-five years (which is how long this stupid embargo has been going on). Truth be told, he's not even in the same league with George W. Bush. Does that seem like an extreme statement to you? In slightly over six short years, the First Fool is responsible for the deaths of close to three quarters of a million people. When Fidel Castro came to power, I was less than five months old. In a span forty-eight years, how many deaths do you think he is responsible for?

It isn't even close, folks.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Take a good look at Castro Posted by: mobile68
» Where's my Cohiba?? Posted by: Conservasaurus
what has USA to offer Cuba???
Posted by: richholland on May 23, 2007 1:59 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
USA Home of the FREE(slaves)
Donot you think that millions of poor hungry cubans long for the American way of freedom.
1. i.e they have 40 years a free health system for everybody,
in America 40.000.000. people have no insurance.
2, but homos can marry in the States and that not likely in Cuba.

So if America comes in the people are waiting for you with flowers ( and handgrenades and guns)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Cuban embargo: Government policy making at its dumbest.
Posted by: HughScott on May 23, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was in USAF flight school at Mariana Air Base, FL, when Fidel Castro rode into Havana on a Russian-made T34 tank. Saw the whole thing live on grainy black-and-white TV.

Although I was a conservative Republican at the time, it seemed to me the Cuban people were exercising their right of self-determination just like members of my clan did in 1776.

Very quickly, however, like all Americans, I learned that Fidel was a Communist dictator in freedom fighter fatigues who hated capitalism. And what did our brilliant leaders do? They played into his hands by embargoing Cuba which continues to this day. How stupid could supposed smart people be?

Had JFK and his successors permitted Cuban tourism, which would've flooded the island with subversive American dollars and Spanish-speaking CIA agents, do you really believe Fidel would be alive today?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

“Fidel Castro is 100% right.”
Posted by: LuisMoro EveryThingCuba.com on May 23, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It will be hard for the few who support the failed 47 year old embargo on Cuba to read and hear past the title.

1. Fidel Castro is right; the pro-embargo supporters have and will continue their 47 years of failed Cuba policies. Just like Castro does.
2. Fidel Castro is right; the pro-embargo supporters don’t care about the Cuban people on the island of Cuba. Just like Castro doesn’t.
3. Fidel Castro is right; the pro-embargo supporters rather argue, fight, steel and even kill until they get property in Cuba. Just like Castro did.
4. Fidel Castro is right; when he says all pro-embargo supporters want is money, material possessions and Cuba’s land. Just like Castro has.
5. Fidel Castro is right; the pro-embargo supporters rather keep friends, families and even their own families separated for 48 years. Just like Castro does.
6. Fidel Castro is right; the pro-embargo supporters rather destroy the Cuban economy because of some 50 year old U.S. corporation. Just like Castro did.
7. Fidel Castro is right; the pro-embargo supporters are no different than the people that hijacked Cuba to before him. Just like they all continue to do today.

I’m a Cuban exile. And the pro-embargo supporters don’t represent me. Just like Castro doesn’t.
8. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters are no different than Fidel Castro.
9. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters continue “to do the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result; that’s insanity.” Just like Castro’s in sane.
10. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters are as guilty as Castro in destroying Cuba.
11. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters don’t care about the United Nations 99% vote against the U.S. embargo on Cuba. Just like Castro doesn’t.
12. I am right. Pro-embargo l don’t care that Americans don’t want the U.S. embargo on Cuba. Just like Castro doesn’t.
13. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters don’t care that my family has not been united in 39 years. Just like Castro doesn’t.
14. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters don’t care my 84 year old grandmother had to sneak into Cuba three times last year to see her dieing son.
15. I am right. Pro-embargo politicians vote for the embargo, only after getting a $1,000 donation. See www.OpenSecrets.com
16. I am right. Pro-embargo lobby receives $80,000,000 U.S. tax dollars a year to fund their failed 47 year old activities.
17. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters say Cuba is terrorist state. That’s what Castro says of the U.S.A.
18. I am right. Pro-embargo politicians set it up so Americans have to get approval from our U.S. Government to mail a package to Cuba. That’s what Castro does to Cubans.
19. I am right. We need to start now in exposing all pro-embargo politicians and vote them out of our U.S. government so we can invade Cuba with tourism, capitalism and with human to human contact.
20. I am right. Pro-embargo supporters and Castro don’t care about you. Even if you’re a pro-embargo and Castro supporter.

Thank God the pro-embargo supporters and Fidel Castro will never break the Cuban spirit. And of course they both will righteously take credit for our human spirit.

We need to do exactly what Castro and pro-embargo supporters don’t want to do.
We need to abolish the failed U.S. embargo on Cuba now. Not tomorrow, today.
Let your representatives know we are voting them out if the embargo is not abolished by their next election. Let them know now, tomorrow and every chance you get up to their election.

Luis Moro
www.EveryThingCuba.com

Ps: I would love to be wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on May 23, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1992 I went to Cuba with a "Pastors For Peace" delegation; we found the country in many ways more Democratic than the U.S. Neighborhood groups met regularly and sent representatives as part of the government;even though Castro was definitely in charge, there was tremendous support for him among the people. Even though people were poor, they had good access to medical care and education for the young. I saw some dissatisfaction among the youth, who saw U.S. television and were lured by our American Luxuries, but most of the poverty and hardship was caused by the U.S. embargo - not by the socialistic state of Cuba.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: brianct
If the USA were........
Posted by: mizipi on May 23, 2007 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Christian nation with Christian leaders, as so many of our politicos remind us, then we would be sending "help" to Cuba, just like we would be doing to the rest of the world, but....good Ol' Uncle Sam sends bombs and military advisors. 300,000,000 people live in the US and those of us who have been fortunate enough to travel around the world, especially those of us who travel off the "tourist-track", well, we have seen that the US is not all that our politicos tell us. Then again, every nation on Earth is pretty much the same, the politicos tout their own nations while bad-mouthing everyone else. Just think if we had a Global War on Military Products like there is a Global War on Drugs..........think about it......
Cuba is our neighbor. Why can't we love our neighbor? Because aristocrats like George Bush have a love of money (seems someone in the Bible spoke about this). People like Bush do not want a society where medical care is inexpensive and readily available. There is no way I can prove it, but I bet the average Cuban is much more happy and content with his or her daily life than the average American.
So, let's befriend Cuba and Iraq and Afghanistan. Let's cut-off military aggression against these folks, and send them food, medicine, and anything else they need, and from Cuba, let's import some doctors and school teachers, something in short supply way down here in Mississippi!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Embargo is Stupid!
Posted by: HomerScarborough on May 23, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even after the Cuban missile crisis we still dealt with Russia, China and other communist countries, and yet the closest one, only 90 miles off our shores, we decide are so bad that they have to be treated differently. I wonder what would have happened if we had dissolved the embargo after the missile crisis? Would they have followed their strongest supporter, Russia, in changing their system of government after the communists lost power in Russia, or, perhaps even earlier after trade, communication, and tourism from the U.S.? I suspect that now the much older Castro is a bit more pragmatic than he was 40 years ago, and has been ready to talk for some time.

It is 40 years past the time that we should have ignored the desire for "revenge" of the Cuban refugees in FL, and did what makes sense. Since many of those who prospered under Batista, and escaped to Miami after his fall to Castro, are now dead of old age, and the majority of those left are 2d, 3rd and even 4th generation American, their stand for the embargo is now likely to be primarily habit. We provided them a home and a fresh start, but we should not allow them to continue to dictate our foreign and trade policies regarding Cuba. It is stupid to refuse to have diplomatic relations with a country only 90 miles from our shores, regardless of their system of government.

I would love to visit Cuba before I die, and I am now 65 years old. However, for my entire adult life it has been illegal for me to do so. Stupid....stupid....stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Long past whatever shelf life it had
Posted by: brunowe on May 23, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even assuming that the Cold War gave some justification for an embargo against Cuba, that passed when the Soviet Union passed into history in 1991. It's clear that the only rationale for it now is that Florida is a swing state. Unfortunately, that rationale is likely to remain in play as long as right-wing Cuban-Americans in Miami continue to be a formidable voting bloc.

I'd like to see an article examing that and how long that state of affairs is likely to last.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if we'd really wanted to undermine Castro...
Posted by: CriminallySane on May 23, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...we'd have begun flooding the island with tourists back in 1960, on an unprecedented scale. That would have made him almost irrelevant very quickly, even as head of state.

I have Cuban friends. They are some of the best people I know.

Some day, when reality returns to the US, Americans may return to Cuba. I hope to see it myself someday, when this inane refusal to engage ends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The anti-castro people in Florida
Posted by: zooeyhall on May 23, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am curious---how many of the rabidly anti-castro Cubans are associated with the pre-Castro secret police and and Cuban oligarchy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Luis Posada Carriles Posted by: fanny666
Castro, Saddam, Noriega, or whomever else....
Posted by: Michael Boldin on May 23, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The policy is the same, and so are the results.

The U.S. has been using force and aggression against nations around the world for decades. Sanctions, coups, wars, and assassinations. What has that gotten us?

We spend billions and billions on hurting, starving and killing people around the world and make our own country less safe too. This needs to stop. now.

Some reading on a new direction for this country:

"A Foreign Policy for America" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

South Africa? Sudan? Rhodesia?
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 23, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is always fun to see the hypocrits who write for Alternet. The very same arguments that Bush et al use were made by the 'progressives' for South Africa decades ago. You remember the unwashed masses chanting and protesting:
"Havard Must Divest"
"No Money for Apartheid"
Bills in Congress (and in most State legislatures) forcing divestiture in any companies doing business with S.A. (Withstanding it actually forced many teacher, other other, state management pension funds to actually lose money)
We have people today who are calling for 'no business with Sudan' also.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WHATS YOUR POINT Posted by: HistArch
sovereignty, anyone?
Posted by: dlueth on May 23, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Notice how the end goal of changing governments is never questioned--only the means.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sovereignty, anyone? Posted by: brianct
mick3
Posted by: mick3 on May 23, 2007 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could the reason for the US's antipathy toward any form of government that doesn't reward capitalist parasites be that US workers might realize what a raw deal they're getting all through their lives? Why is the US so terrified of other nations' in the hemisphere achieving democracy, socialism, or even communism? One: the US functions to support corporations' depredations of other countries and has waged scores of wars in doing so. Two: If working people saw the enormous benefits of socialism, they'd think twice about the crumbs they''ve had to settle for. Lousy schools, worse health system, long and unhealthy (for both the individual and the family) working hours, and on and on. Oh well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All this talk about Cuba suddenly-
Posted by: WitchyNy on May 23, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michael Moore's new movie must really be a bombshell!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our policies towards Cuba have been insane since the Monroe Doctrine
Posted by: fanny666 on May 23, 2007 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They just got worse after Castro.
link

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Viva El Pescador!! Viva Alien Gonzales! How about we swap all the Cubans in Miami
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 23, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for Gauntanamo Naval Base? Solve two problems at once. Give Castro a call (maybe have ex-President Carter or "Rev" Jesse Jackson set it up) and set up the deal. We'll give Guantanamo back to Castro if he takes back all the Cubans who've fled Cuba. It would help solve our 'torture' publicity problem as well as going a long way to solve the corruption, crime, drug, and health problems in Floriday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

liberal assumptions
Posted by: stepp on May 23, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another article that somehow assumes Castro should go....the embargo is bad because its not effective in overthrowing Fidel. Never mind most cubans DONT want a change....and never mind the US finished in a tie at 75th place (with poland) in infant mortality....and cuba at the top.....but right, the US knows whats best for cubans....so maybe, MAYBE, Cubans should be left alone and the US should try to curb its endless anti communist hysteria and its Imperial delusions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reaching out
Posted by: willymack on May 23, 2007 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In case anyone's interested, Castro's Cuba has attempted many times over the years to mend fences with the US, only to be rebuffed every time by the knuckleheads in Washington. The latest offer was one anyone in his right mind would've gladly accepted-that was the offer to help us out in the wake of hurricaine Katrina. Cuba is one of the very best countries in disaster control, since they're in the hurricaine belt as well. Venezuela also offered to help, but nooooo! The neothugs turned them both down. Why? Because those countries refuse to knuckle under to our bellicose foreign policies. So, what was a national tragedy was made far worse, first by the bushies ignoring expert advice as to the peril hurricaine Katrina posed, and then doing NOTHING until it was far too late for thousands of our citizens. We need to reach out to the bush crime cartel with indictments, prosecutions, convictions, and prison time for the sorry lot of them. Katrina alone should've been enough to do the trick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has the embargo really been such a bad thing?
Posted by: l_m_n on May 23, 2007 11:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no data to back this up, but here is my train of thought...

Cuba has been free to trade with other countries than the US. By doing so, it is still poor but has all these public services that people keep trumpeting. I have heard that this is because Castro dumps a lot of money back into the Cuban economy, instead of keeping it for himself like many other government officials worldwide are prone to do.

If the US as a whole was allowed to trade with Cuba, I find it hard to believe that they wouldn't have turned him sick with their corporate greed just as they have done with the rest of the world (third world especially). Then where would the money have gone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If things in Cuba are so great...
Posted by: TagsNOLA on May 23, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... why does Castro also impose travel restrictions against his citizens? Even given a ban on travel to Cuba by US citizens, if Castro allowed his citizens freedom of travel, perhaps Cubans could visit their expatriate American relatives here in the USA or perhaps in Mexico. I think Castro and the US govt both have vested interests in travel and trade restrictions. On our side, by and large it's the conservative anti-Castro lobby, mostly in Florida. On Castro's side, hey, for all his free health care and free education, he's a dictator and a creep who will not tolerate meaningful dissent. And he is as hidebound in his Marxist ideology as the neo-cons here in the USA. I say lift the embargo. Castro will croak soon enough. And as he watches from hell, he can witness the transformation of his communist enclave into a capitalist economy like China and Vietnam.
TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And CUBA?
Posted by: Ahimsa on May 23, 2007 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this talk about what "we" will give, bring, do, (etc) to Cuba. Are these words replaceable with "enforce on"?
Do Cubans want "us"? Is it an honest desire at all to force upon other our ways? What is the ethical line here?
Can we begin to think outside our imperial software?
I'd like to see the Cuban version of this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Castro's words Posted by: fanny666
why are u still keen to change Cuba govt? Thats not democratic
Posted by: brianct on May 25, 2007 10:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'They believe that business, not isolation, is a better way to change governments'

So youre a friend of democracy are u?
why are u so keen to change Cubas govt? YOUR not a cuban! You should seek to change your own govt, which currently is mass murdering its way thru the middle east.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]