Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

'Tom Cruise's Church of Hate Tried to Destroy Me'

By Paul Bracchi, The Daily Mail. Posted May 21, 2007.


Last week, people saw a video of BBC reporter John Sweeney losing his mind during an interview with a spokesperson from the "Church" of Scientology. Another reporter says he too was harassed after writing about the cult.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe

Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich

DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux

Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse

Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris

ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed

Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset

Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake

Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis

Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen

War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam

Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte

More stories by Paul Bracchi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The voice at the end of the line was trembling.

"Is that Mr. Bracchi?"

"Yes, it is," I replied.

The caller could not have been more relieved. I was supposed to be dead. Someone had started a rumor that I had been killed in a fire. The same people who had tried to obtain my exdirectory phone number, handed out pamphlets attacking me and dispatched an American private detective -- an ex-Los Angeles police officer -- to Britain to frighten and smear the source who had helped me expose their activities.

Almost daily, threatening letters arrived by fax and post at the newspaper where I used to work. Messages were left on the answer machine at the home of the managing director. Strangers turned up in his village asking questions about him. And the culprits behind this campaign of intimidation? Step forward the Church of Scientology.

This week the Mail exposed disturbing apparent links between the "church" and the City of London Police. Our report was followed by a Panorama program in which reporter John Sweeney was seen losing his temper with a scientologist, claiming afterwards that he had been driven over the edge by a concerted campaign of harassment by the group. I, more than anyone, could understand why.

Sweeney spent six months investigating this so-called religion. I had spent more than a year doing so when stories of my "unfortunate demise" began circulating. By the time you read this article, the Church of Scientology will no doubt be unleashing its attack dogs -- sorry, officials from the Office of Special Affairs -- on me again.

The founder of the "religion," science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard issued directives on how "to handle the press," including tips on how to get a reporter "fired and discredited." Well, they have tried and failed with me once already. My first report, "The Secrets of Saint Hill," was published more than ten years ago. Saint Hill is the castle in East Grinstead, West Sussex, where Scientology's U.K. headquarters is based. The backlash was swift. The first principle of Scientology, you see, is "Shoot the messenger."

Critics who had contributed to the articles were also targeted. Some of them found Eugene Ingram, who had been branded an "insidious individual" in a court case in the United States, on their doorstep. He "visited" the 77-year-old mother of one of my sources as well as his parents' former home in Staffordshire and his wife's family. Ingram knew, of course, that the man's relatives would not "dish the dirt" on my source. That was not the point. He just wanted to let me, and everyone else who had helped me, know that he was in town. In the parlance of Scientology, this is called a "noisy investigation." It has only one purpose: to intimidate.

The real victims of Scientology, of course, are not journalists but the parents who have lost sons or daughters to these deluded fanatics. Their harrowing stories, of which there are more below, help explain why, in Britain, Scientology is recognized neither as a church nor a charity. It is, in fact, a cult. Scientologists do not like that word, so let me repeat it -- CULT.

Hubbard, the man who created Scientology in 1952, has an unusual CV for a religious and spiritual leader. As well as being a writer, he was a congenital liar: quite simply a "charlatan." That was the view of a High Court judge in 1984, who said Hubbard's theories were "corrupt, sinister and dangerous." If nothing else, the movement's survival is proof that with money -- Scientology is worth billions worldwide -- you can make some people, even intelligent people, believe almost anything. Stars such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta have given Scientology a profile and show business gloss it simply does not deserve. Indeed, those who are not familiar with its tactics and history regard Scientologists, who are convinced we are all descended from a race of aliens called thetans, as weird, not wicked.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: scientology

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"A Cult Is A Religion With No Political Power" - Tom Wolfe
Posted by: DontSweatTheTechNick on May 21, 2007 1:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple months ago I read a great article on the dangerous cult of scientology by John Atack called "The Total Freedom Trap: Scientology, Dianetics, and L. Ron Hubbard," which I'll link below. It exposes Hubbard as not only a charlatan (which he certainly was) but also a sadist who beat and tortured his wife. It's entertaining reading too because the tall-tales Hubbard told about himself are so far removed from reality that it's downright comical at times. At least it would be if people didn't take him seriously as some sort of messiah. Unfortunately some do, and while I'm an atheist who sees varying degrees of destructive tendencies in all religions/cults, Scientology seems especially dangerous because of the cult mentality described in the Atack article below, and the fact that a handful of celebrities like Cruise and Travolta actively promote Scientology, thereby making it seem "cool" to some. Perhaps the best way to rid the world of the scourge of Scientology is to encourage its practitioners in Hollywood to make more films based on Scientology and the writings of Hubbard. Judging by Travolta's "Battlefield Earth," Scientology would end real quick.

http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Fishman/atack-freedom-trap.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The name kills me!
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 21, 2007 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For people who believe anything that L. Ron Hubbard wrote to call themselves "Scientologists," suggesting they put their faith in science, not God, is hilarious!

So what kind of church music do Scientologists play? The theme from "Twilight Zone"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The name kills me! Posted by: peacefullaim
» You got it, peacefullaim. Posted by: TheTruthSeeker
Lets be honest
Posted by: cordas on May 21, 2007 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no difference between a cult and or a religion. They are both really samething, controling the lives of their followers and making sure they have a hand in the wallet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lets be honest Posted by: AppleMommie AZ
» RE: Lets be honest Posted by: Doubtom
Lost his what?
Posted by: polyquat50 on May 21, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John Sweeney certainly lost his temper, and his sense of decorum, maybe even a little of his dignity.

But I would hope that his mind is still somewhat in tact. Or did I miss the bit where they carted him off in a straight jacket?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientology no worse than other faiths
Posted by: Bobsays on May 21, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least they don't blow themselves up to visit 70 virgins, or circumcise women, or light themselves on fire, or flagelate themselves, or crawl on thorns, or develop elaborate caste systems to avoid cleaning their own toilets.

Yes, it is nutty, but at least they are focused on being personally successful and defeating those evil 'thetons'.

It was an easy target for the BBC, and I bet if I wanted to do an unflatering documentary on the den of PC dogma and New Labour propoganda that is the BBC, they would get nasty too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The Dead Sea Scrolls, etc... Posted by: elfinito
» Totally Correct! Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Totally Correct! Posted by: Persephone8
A Historical Tidbit
Posted by: jhecht on May 21, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As some of you know, L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology's founder, was a (bad) science fiction writer. He was among the lesser lights tutored and published by the seminal editor of Astounding Science Fiction - John Campbell. Among Campbell's better authors were Isaac Asimov, and Robert Heinlein.

The story goes that a group of Astounding's authors were having a bull session one day, and someone asked the question, "What's the fastest way to make a million dollars?"

John Campbell answered quickly, "Found a new religion!"

And L. Ron Hubbard listened...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Historical Tidbit Posted by: YogiBear
» Its only about money Posted by: Swedish liberal
Scientology: The Early Years
Posted by: eddie torres on May 21, 2007 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before he invented Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard successfully "invested" in other religious operations. This included an association with Jack Parsons, head of the Pasadena lodge of Aleister Crowley's Ordo Templi Orientis, shortly after WWII. Parsons' game was "Magick" - involving sex ceremonies and lots of cash.

Hubbard took Parsons' money, and then took his girlfriend. He made her his second wife, without bothering to divorce his first wife. The "Laws Of Man" in states like California call that "bigamy". During this period, he supposedly became addicted to barbiturates.

Sex, drugs, and money. It sounds a lot like Rock And/Or Roll. Thank God for California...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientologists are also very litigous
Posted by: UnEasyOne on May 21, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only have they sued the IRS and numerous individuals; ironicly they sued the Cult Awareness Network into oblivion. As part of the settlement, they took over the CAW. If you call now for help in extracting a family member from a cult, it will be a Scientologist who answers the phone! They won't tell you that either.

I would differentiate between cults and mainstream religions mainly in the intensity and severity of the programming. As a "cradle Catholic" who deprogrammed myself, I would be the last to assert that what the MSRs do is not programming. Advanced and intense "love bombing", official intimidation of dissenters and a host of psychological techniques make these cults dangerous to us all. I would call Scientology a "first degree" cult, for example and modern Catholicism a second.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientology Rocks
Posted by: fanny666 on May 21, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am utterly fascinated by this shit.

L. Ron Hubbard: The Greatest Man Who Has Ever Lived

Illustrated History of Scientology (right click, save PDF)

Operation Clambake

But remember: do *not* try to understand the R-6 implant! It is calculated to kill (by pneumonia, etc.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scientology Rocks Posted by: jroth420
scientology link
Posted by: bookie on May 21, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I started looking at Scientology awhile back when Tom Cruise was acting so crazy in public. Amazing what people will let themselves be brainwashed with. Here's a site with lots of links
http://www.rickross.com/groups/scientology.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I will no longer see a Tom Cruise or John Travolta movie.
Posted by: Ellie1 on May 21, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are both friggin nuts, and I won't finance their life style. Can anyone give me a list of other nutso scientologist performers and companies?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Luckily ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Luckily ... Posted by: YogiBear
» Agreed, Posted by: Krotos
» See also Posted by: fanny666
p.s.-it isn't just scientology
Posted by: Ellie1 on May 21, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I won't see a Mel Gibson movie either. Anyone who is way out there, in my opinion, I won't finance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cult Culture
Posted by: mloftus on May 21, 2007 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A cult is a religion with no political power" is an ironic quote that today could easily be said in a tongue and cheek context. Religion's power is evident world-wide and seen as a motivator of people and cultures in the realms of politics and governance. The Church of Scientology has managed to indoctrinate its following quite effectively. The sway it may have in politics is strategically seen in great part via high profile actors. How different is it than a PAC or lobbyist. Influence is predecessor to power, and who doesn't want power. I fear we miss the point, leaders of people have a resposibility to society only if thay are elected by that society. Secret societies have leaders who may or may not be forthright with their constituency, much less be perceived is any light by those outside their organisation other than through a carefully branded image. Politics is the religion of power. Cult is just that, secrecy assumed. Is it possible that the White House fosters cult culture? duh! Have the Thetans gotten to them too?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IRS ruling is key to Scientologists power. Besides the tax advantages
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 21, 2007 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the brain-washed people who believe in the cult are forced to give LARGE amounts of money to the 'church'. Germany is one of the few countries that have refused to bow to the cult and officially points out the dangers of the cult to its citizens. The USA, due to litigation and intimidation, were forced to give the cult tax-breaks and the cult uses very dangerous methods for anyone who tells the truth about the church (especially ex-members.) Including lawsuits, private eyes, threats, hang-up calls, financial manipulations, blackmail, kidnapping, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Purr-lease!
Posted by: RozzieB on May 21, 2007 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if you throw enough money at something you can get people to believe anything? Oh come on... Excuse me, what is the average IQ of your readership? Scientology works for lots and lots of people and is probably the fastest growing religion in the World. It may be that it doesn't work for some people but you can't argue with the fact that a hell of a lot of people seem to be getting something out of it. Frankly this type of journalism should be kept for the National Enquirer where people expect lots of fiction with their 'news'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» just like coffee enemas Posted by: fanny666
» RE: just like coffee enemas Posted by: Persephone8
» RE: attacking Scientology Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Posted by: CatDad
for the life of me
Posted by: zooeyhall on May 21, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the life of me, I simply can't understand how people can find the slightest attraction to a "religion" founded by some half-assed science fiction writer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: for the life of me Posted by: babs
» RE: for the life of me Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: for the life of me Posted by: CatDad
» RE: for the life of me Posted by: elfinito
» RE: for the life of me Posted by: YogiBear
OTL VIII In Training . . . Kindly keep your snide remarks to yourself!
Posted by: MAD on May 21, 2007 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Travolta's extravagant contracts demand 8 new Armani T-shirts ($300 each) a day during filming because he doesn't believe in wearing clothing that has been washed. What's so strange about that? So what if Tom Cruise believes that Xenu used exact replicas of modern DC-8 jetliners as transports billions of years ago?

I'm currently preparing for my OTL Level 8 certification aboard "La Boheme". It's a steal for around $300K. I mean where else can you pay to be brainwashed by some of America's most gullible idiots? Oh, SNAP - Christian, Jewish and Muslim places of worship! My bad!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Charlatan?
Posted by: Elmo409 on May 21, 2007 1:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If, as the author suspects,
Hubbard, the man who created Scientology in 1952, has an unusual CV for a religious and spiritual leader. As well as being a writer, he was a congenital liar: quite simply a "charlatan". that does not in itself disqualify Scientologeekery as a religion. I recall reading that Joseph Smith was held in equally high regard by his neighbors in New York until the angel Moroni revealed to him the location of the golden plates on Hill Cummorah. No one is going to say that the faith professed by both the Senate majority leader and a wealthy candidate for President are worshiping a false pantheon, are they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'll say it Posted by: Techubus
» RE: Charlatan? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» I'll say it too Posted by: Veronique
And they call athiests crazy?
Posted by: chanceny on May 21, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As if there weren't enough choices already, between the AC crapola the BC mythologies, the virgin births, various resurrections, burning bushes, parting seas and endless bloody wars to satisfy the perceived interpretations of whatever creator the deluded follow, the newbies, mormonism and scientology, are absolutely even more astounding. A seemingly ordinary man, a Smith-for goodness sake- climbed a mountain and, lo and behold, discovered two golden tablets delivered by an angel, unseen by anyone but him. He then proclaimed himself to be the new chosen one, (who actually came with instructions), and was believed in by so many 'seekers' he started a movement that became a phenom. Then there's Hubbard, a lousy sci-fi writer, who realized the intellect of his fans would not be much of a challenge for him to thoroughly convince the moldable mindless mass of them to worship and adore his new way of 'splainin our evolution to make them feel good and all smart. All religion asks the same of it's faithful - to accept, as fact, scenarios that make no sense. The leaps of faith are as ridiculous as possible, making the believers suspend whatever realities they might have once possessed, possibly, and at the mercy of whoever interprets the necessary rules to live ones life as a righteous person. It was sad enough as it already was with just the big 4. All wars were started and fought in god's ever-changing name, cementing the divisions that continue to wreak death and destruction on our planet. Scientology has allowed outer space aliens into the mix. Maybe they'll be better prepared to handle the destruction of our planet because of their affinity to other-worldy teachings. At least they aren't passively sittin around waitin on Armegedon to rapturize em up. What a sad commentary on humanity that fundamentalist religious fanatics of all stripes control the minds and actions of the majority of us. Distorted religious teachings can only doom us all to endless violence, discrimination and bigotry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has anyone read L. Ron Hubbard Jr.?
Posted by: ReallyBearish on May 21, 2007 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
L. Ron Hubbard Jr. wrote an article that appeared in Playboy back in the 1970s or early 80s. Anyone familiar with this article and why it wasn't quoted here? He commented on strong-arm tactics and some interesting details regarding his father's family life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientology is serious stuff and is based on science...
Posted by: aussidawg on May 21, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...kinda like evangelical Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Modern Cult Religions include Consumerism, Video Games, Science
Posted by: sofla100 on May 21, 2007 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am no fan of Scientology, but, in fairness, we have plenty of cults and addictions in our society. Look at the influence of advertisining and consumerism. It is constantly work harder and harder for more and more money, to buy more and more things one does not need. Next you have video games. Who here has to get the latest and the greatest DOOM version? Spening hours and hours glued to a video port, sure sounds like an addiction to me. Lastly, you have science and "big science" (science allied with industry and consumerism) itself. Carl Sagan "looking in wonder" at the stars. It's a belief system and a cult as well. It all depends on "mathematical laws" that work consistently and that what one sees under the microscope or up in the sky "actually exists" independent of the observer somehow. This is just another cult of sorts when you think about it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He cashed the check
Posted by: fibrowitch on May 21, 2007 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comment by Hubbard was made at a World Science Fiction Convention. A second writer, who I shall not name, made him a ten dollar bet that he could not START a religion.

Once his book dianetics became a big seller, and people started 'joining his church' he announced he had won the bet, and demanded payment.

The gentleman who made the bet, gave him a check at a different science fiction convention in front of witnesses. Hubbard was not only very pleased with himself, but he cashed the check.

As far as I am concerned, that proves the entire cult to be a lie. A ten dollar lie at that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lovecraftian cult ??
Posted by: ShoShenQ on May 21, 2007 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure they worship Cthulhu, fucking cultists, kill em all !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That is not dead..... Posted by: moflard
» RE: That is not dead..... Posted by: Swatopluk
» Cthulhu for President! (nm) Posted by: moflard
Cult: a Word of the Totalitarian Lexicon
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on May 21, 2007 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is church used in quotations throughout this article? Historicaly churches have been harmful in proportion as they have been powerful; it seems strange to single CoS out. I think that in reality affixing the label "cult" is a device giving one carte blanche to persecute --

"The Nazi’s too regarded ‘cults’ as ripe candidates for persecution. On July 20, 1937, the SS Reichsf[ue]hrer Reinhard Heydrich ordered the banning and persecution of small religious sects, including the Bahais, theosophical groups, New Salem Society and the Seventh Day Adventists. The Gestapo claimed that such action was required because of the sects’ menace to society."
ALEX COCKBURN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Penelope, Good For You
Posted by: ZPaul on May 21, 2007 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whew!!! It´s a relief to know that Penelope Cruz never married Tom Cruise.
Way to go, Pe!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Invisible Friends?
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on May 21, 2007 10:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we in this world? Is there a presiding figure to make sense of all this, a god who in the end, despite making people suffer, wishes them well?

How on earth can religious people believe in so much arbitrary, clearly invented balderdash?

he acceptance of a creed, any creed, entitles the acceptor to membership in the sort of artificial extended family we call a congregation.

It is a way to fight loneliness. Any time I see a person fleeing from reason and into religion, I think to myself, there goes a person who simply cannot stand being so goddamned lonely anymore.

Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.

There is nothing spiritual in the worship of the unknown and unknowable, in the self-denial of a slave at the command of a master whom he fears. Fastings, prayings, mutilations, kneelings, and mortification are either the result of, or result in, insanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Invisible Friends? Posted by: frankenfoot
This reminds me of a story...
Posted by: Mr. Heathen on May 21, 2007 10:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About a woman who's neighbor's dog told her that he was from outer space. But, the woman didn't believe him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pestered by Scientologists
Posted by: wisegalah on May 22, 2007 12:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For years while while walking through city on my home at night I would be accosted by Scientologists who would ask me to do a little questionnaire. I knew exactly who they represented because their headquarters were just around the corner.
The conversation would go like this on every occasion;
"Hello, I am conducting a survey would you like to answer some questions?"
"Who is asking the questions?"
"Me."
"Who are you?"
"Just me."
"What is your name and why are you running a survey?"
"It is not important what my name is and it is just for my own interest."
"I don't believe you. For whom are you working?"
"Nobody. It is just for my own interest."
"I don't believe you.'

And so on and so on;
until I would say that I knew that they were representatives of Scientology and asked them why they were unwilling to identify themselves. They would at that time generally admit their connection, at which point I asked them why they were not being honest and saying that up front.
They had a range of excuses but got very annoyed when I pointed out that their deceit reflected that of the degenerate liar Hubbard. Some threatened me physically and demanded to know my name. (Here not even the police can demand your name in the street unless they are about to arrest you.)
I usually laughed and said that they would have to go back and pay thousands to have some more engrams removed. They didn't find that amusing either. Nor did they like my characterisation of their brand of garbage as a 'bucket of shit' just like all of the other organised belief systems.

And as for Cruise, Travolta, et al. None of these people are noted for their intellectual depth. Just dumb and inadequate and angry and vicious when questioned .......... just like Hubbard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scientology ~ Fundamental Christianity
Posted by: JBravoEcho11 on May 22, 2007 1:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before I read this article I always wondered why people spent so much time worrying about Scientology as it is just a small cult. Also there are so many more important things to focus on. Then I recognized the eery similarities between the "religion" and Fundamental Christianity. This article is highly relevent; more than many would think. Psuedo-science, government infiltration, billions of dollars of influence, star charlatans, claims of cures (homosexuality, mental disorders), detox centers (AA is surprisingly religious for a court-enforced operation), the links in high places and discrediting and intimidation of enemies. The parallels are so creepy I had to stop reading the article. Any religion that asks for exorbitant fees, has membership restrictions, or tears people apart instead of bringing them together is a cult.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pay to Play
Posted by: SteveO on May 22, 2007 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1985 I was given (ha ha) a copy of the Scientology book which I read. I was interested enough to go visit their office.

After about a 20 minute explanation about "being cleared" I was handed a price sheet for reaching the various levels! Even the apocalyptic Christian cults aren't that blatant about it.

Needless to say I ran for the door.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have been a SF fan since the early 60s
Posted by: UnEasyOne on May 22, 2007 8:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Robert Heinlein, Isaac Asimov or A.C. Clark had started a cult, I might have joined - at least it would have been intelligently designed. The Scientology nonsense isn't even good science fiction - much less a viable lifestyle. It is however, one very excellent scam by a third rate writer and first class con artist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People will believe anything!
Posted by: Darrell Kern on May 22, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many people are looking for ways to improve their lives and will follow almost anyone who looks like they have their shit together and/or are a powerful presence.

And it is heartbreaking that some people Like L. Ron Hubbard, Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggert, the Pope and everyone else takes advantage of these seekers.

In the end though, these bastards will pay a price for misleading people. A very heavy price. And they brought it on themselves!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reminds me of.....
Posted by: HotKarl on May 22, 2007 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The pro-Israel lobby. The level of deceit and the shamelessness of the intimidation tactics are quite similar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eminds me of..... Posted by: mommy64
The Official Church of the United States of America
Posted by: South42 on May 24, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having spent a considerable amount of time as a member of the Church of Scientology, both as a follower and a staff member I have some knowledge of the inner workings.

Most people don’t know that the church has a special relationship with the government. The church has a special ruling from the IRS that lets its members attend church academies and deduct the cost from their taxes as a charitable deduction. No other religion has this privilege.

One of the founders of the church’s highest corporate entity the “Church of Spiritual Technology” is Meade Emory who was an Assistant Commissioner of the IRS at the time the Church of Scientology received its special privileges from the IRS. The church also has a Tax Compliance Officer.

What other religion do you know of that has a person dedicated to making sure its parishioners properly file their taxes and has a former IRS official controlling it at the highest levels.

Truly it is the “new” Church of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is "Church" in quote marks?
Posted by: YogiBear on May 24, 2007 10:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because from where I'm standing, they all suck. Cult, church, faith-based group, call it what you like, but one is never better than another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The word "cult"
Posted by: PandaBear on May 25, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know that "cult" has a negative definition these days, but I wish there was a way to encourage people to use a different word.

A "cult" is simply a new movement, usually small in numbers. The early Christian movement was a cult. Alone, the term is neutral.

Unfortunately, the word is abused nowadays and if one wishes, any church or group can be called a "cult." If we insist on using that word in a negative context, I would love it if a common, more rigid, definition would be accepted.

All that said, Tom Cruise guaranteed I wouldn't be going to any more of his films the minute he attacked those with mental health issues. I can't speak of any personal experience with Scientology (except that the book of dianetics shows that this teaching is anti-gay, which, of course, annoys me). But Cruise is an example of human decency gone rotten.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What is a cult?
Posted by: LeeAnnG on May 25, 2007 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently read a set of principles that define a cult. These are:

Cults have adherents who become increasingly dependent on the movement for their views on reality.

Important decisions in the lives of the adherents are made by others.

Cults are characterized by making sharp distinctions between "us and them," "divine and satanic," "good and evil," etc. that are not open for discussion.

Cults have leaders who claim divine authority for their deeds and for their orders to their followers.

Cults have leaders and movements that are unequivocally focused on achieving certain goals.

None of this is appreciably different from any religion. Scientology is, according to this article, in the throes of establishing itself partly through violence and intimidation. This is what many religions have done through the ages, although some have also been sanctioned by governments (think the Inquisition).

There is nothing really inherently more absurd about what Scientologists believe than what, for example, Christians believe. Virgin births, resurrections, all of the "miracles," and many other notions are no more believable than being descended from aliens.

Religion tends to be pretty irrational, and Scientology is irrational in the extreme, but to keep calling it "religion" rather than simply religion without the quotes is condescending. I don't like the whole idea of Scientology, but I don't much like the whole idea of any religion based on conformity, insistence on absolute knowledge of the nature of god or the hereafter, or moral guidelines gleaned from people who believed the earth was flat either.

Attempting to differentiate between "cults" and "religion" is like attempting to differentiate between makes of cars. They have different features, but they are still essentially vehicles to get you from one place to another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It happened to me too
Posted by: pthursto on May 26, 2007 7:45 AM