Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Will Chimp Life Get Human Rights?

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted May 11, 2007.


Hiasl, a 26-year old Austrian-based chimpanzee, is petitioning the courts for human status, and let me be the first to extend him a warm welcome to our species.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Barbara Ehrenreich

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Hiasl, a 26-year old Austrian-based chimpanzee, is petitioning the courts for human status, and let me be the first to extend him a warm welcome to our species.

My animal rights activism has never gone beyond the cage-free eggs' stage; it's the human possibilities raised by Hiasl's case that caught my attention. If a chimpanzee can be declared a person, then there's nothing in the way of a person becoming an ape -- and I'm not just talking about a retroactive status applied to ex-husbands. In fact, I predict a surge in trans-specied people, who will eagerly go over to the side of the chimps.

The transition need not involve costly, time-consuming, surgical arm extensions and whole-body Rogaine treatments, since we are practically chimpanzees already. We share 99 percent of our genome with them, making it possible for chimps to accept human blood transfusions and kidney donations. Despite their vocal limitations, they communicate easily with each other and can learn human languages. They use tools and live in groups that display behavioral variations attributable to what anthropologists recognize as culture. And we may be a lot closer biologically than Darwin ever imagined.

Last May, paleontologists reported evidence of inter-breeding between early humans and chimps as recently as 5 million years ago, and proposed that modern humans are the result of this ancient predilection for bestiality.

Hiazl's motivation is economic: The animal sanctuary where he resides has run out of funds, and, in Austria, only a person can receive personal donations. Many humans in this country may be similarly motivated to seek chimp status. There are individuals who commit crimes in order to gain access to the free food and medical care available in a prison. How much easier and more pleasant to have oneself declared a chimp and win entry to the soft life of a zoo animal! Not only are the guards friendly, but one's enclosure has been designed with far more psychological forethought than the average office or cubicle.

True, not all chimps have it as easy as Hiazl, who spends most of his time watching TV. There's the danger of being sold to a pharmaceutical company for research, for example, but this should decline as chimps achieve human status. We can't expect much progress on chimpanzee rights in Bush's America, according to Elizabeth Hess, author of the forthcoming book Nim Chimpsky: The Chimp Who Would Be Human. But in addition to the Austrian debate, the Spanish parliament is considering a bill to extend "fundamental moral and legal protections" to apes. Once apes achieve these protections, American humans are going to want them too. I'm thinking food, shelter, and medical/veterinary care.

Another reason to make the human-to-ape transition is the sex, at least if you're smart enough to declare yourself a bonobo or pygmy chimpanzee. Bonobos, who are genetically as close to humans as larger chimpanzees, use sex much as we use handshakes - as a form of greeting between individuals in any gender combination. See an old friend, and you start rubbing genitals together, with mutual orgasm serving as a hearty "How ya doin', pal?" Plus, bonobo bands are female-dominated, which should be a special enticement to women investigating their chimpanzee transition options.

There are is another, less selfish reason, to seek chimpanzee status. Like me, you may be a wee bit disappointed in our own species. Here we are - the tool-wielding, word-spouting brainiacs of the earth -- and what have we done with our powers? We've poisoned the world, encrusted it with our unsightly infrastructure, and exterminated most of our fellow earth-dwellers, from elephants and tigers to fish.

Of course, what makes humans especially obnoxious is our tendency to believe in our absolute superiority over all creatures. We alone, of all species, have come up with religions and philosophies that declare us uniquely deserving of global hegemony. Yet one by one, our "unique" human traits have turned out to be shared: Chimpanzees have culture; dolphins make art (in the form of bubble patterns); female vampire bats share food with their friends; male baboons will die to defend their troop; rats have recently demonstrated a capability for reflection that resembles consciousness. We are animals, and they are us.

But just because you want, for whatever reason, to attain the status of a chimp, don't assume that you'll make the cut. Just as we don't know how the Austrian court will rule in Hiasl's case, we have no reason to believe that the chimps will have us.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: animal rights, humans

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Minor but important correction
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on May 11, 2007 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a ninety-eight point two percent (98.2%) similarity between human and chimp genomes from what I understand. If precise figures are available, please use them. Misrepresenting numbers is done by those who seek to deliberately obfuscate, fraudulently manipulate data, and jerk people around.

That tends to make some of us testy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It depends what you measure Posted by: stevewilkesuk
» I'm surprised Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: I'm surprised Posted by: blitzmesser
» RE: Minor but important correction Posted by: blitzmesser
Our interdependence.
Posted by: greentime on May 11, 2007 3:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sooner we acknowledge our interdependence with nature and back away from brutalizing the planet and fellow inhabitants, the sooner we will evolve and survive.

We have lost so much by crowning ourselve little lords of this and big lords of that. We have lost our connection and our respect, for all life, for each other, for our planet.

Is nature always gentle? Will we be able to be? No.
Will animals still eat each other, ummm... undoubtedly. But this is about balance and we as a species have tipped the scales so far down that we are in danger of ending up alone or more to the point, gone.

We owe the other species of this planet the respect they deserve. They are our fellow travelers. They are, as it turns out related to us. It is a family of life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fun article
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 11, 2007 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Good one: "Once apes achieve these protections, American humans are going to want them too. I'm thinking food, shelter, and medical/veterinary care."

2. I don't know if bubble patterns could be considered art. Then again, look at all the crap that humans consider art. Plus, dolphins are more fun and friendly than a bunch of flaky, creepy, screwed-up artist types.

3. If a monkey can be president of the US, or President of the World Bank ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Paul_Wolfowitz_2006.jpg ), then the possibilities and opportunities for monkeys are endless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fun article Posted by: psyorg
» RE: Fun article Posted by: talkville
Avoid the Rush
Posted by: Windwhistler on May 11, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sign up for Bonobohood today!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Petitioning for human status?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 11, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, then, does Austria have something like Social Security Numbers that identify 'human' status? So does that not mean then that the criterion, as true as far back in history as we can see, is the capacity to sign your name, make your mark, paint your paw print on the wall of the cave, indicate that you are of sound mind, whatever?

Or maybe for couch potatoes, the test should be whether the chimp shops for items advertised on tv?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Apes are close to extinction and need protection
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 11, 2007 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apes are close to extinction and need protection.

See:
www.bushmeat.org
www.bushmeat.net
www.karlammann.com/
www.orangutan.org

Chimps, Bonobos, Eastern Lowland Gorillas, Western Lowland Gorillas, Mountain Gorillas, Gibbons and all MONKEYS are at serious risk.

Here's a snip about chimps from Jane Goodall:

Chimps in the wild are on the brink of extinction. At the turn of the last century, chimpanzees living across West and Central Africa numbered around one million. Today their total number is less than 200,000.

There are many reasons why chimps are disappearing. Their habitat is vanishing at an alarming rate due to deforestation caused by logging companies. As well, the bushmeat trade in Africa has led to an increase in the poaching of chimpanzees and other primates. A crisis with far-reaching implications, the bushmeat trade involves the slaughter of adult chimps, on a commercial scale, for human consumption. And, all too often after witnessing the death of their mothers, infant chimpanzees are then captured and sold illegally into the pet trade and for entertainment uses.

While working to put an end to the bushmeat trade, the Jane Goodall Institute is ensuring that illegally held infant chimps are confiscated from poachers or market vendors and placed in sanctuaries across the continent. In these sanctuaries, orphan chimps live together in a natural environment in the hands of experienced and loving caregivers. They receive proper nutrition and learn to live in social groups that are necessary to their survival and essential for their development and well-being.

Funding from The Jane Goodall Institute provides care for almost 200 chimpanzees, and employment opportunities for local people at four locations in Africa. Sanctuaries are under tremendous financial strain as they do their best to house and feed all the animals that need their care.

Please become a Guardian and support these very special chimps. Whether you are touched by the story of an orphan chimpanzee at one of our sanctuaries or motivated to play role in Jane’s historic research at Gombe, there’s a chimpanzee out there who needs your help.

As a Chimpanzee Guardian you will receive:

* A biography of your chimpanzee
* A chimpanzee poster
* A certificate of guardianship
* Information about Gombe Stream Research Centre, the Sanctuary Program and the Jane Goodall Institute.

But most important, you will receive the satisfaction of knowing that your contribution supports these and other chimpanzees. In addition, you will help empower African villagers to build sustainable livelihoods that include regional conservation goals such as reforestation or an end to the illegal bushmeat trade.

Please help, become a Chimpanzee Guardian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more Bushmeat Links....just google "bushmeat"
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 11, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bushmeat

http://www.friendsofwashoe.org/bushmeat.shtml

http://www.janegoodall.org/chimp_guardian/default.asp

http://www.gorilla-haven.org/ghbushmeat.htm

http://www.cnn.com/TECH/science/9812/30/africa.bushmeat/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Poachers killing gorillas, chimps for bush meat delicacy
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 11, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poachers killing gorillas, chimps for bush meat delicacy
Threatened species are a luxurious target
Activists blame logging companies for problem
December 30, 1998


From Correspondent Gary Streiker

EASTERN CAMEROON (CNN) -- In Central Africa, some of man's closest relatives are being pushed close to extinction by two disturbing trends -- civilization's appetite for luxury foods and virgin timber.

Here, in the space of two days, an entire family of gorillas was shot and killed -- three adult females, two babies and the father, a big silverback.

The gorillas were killed to be butchered, smoked and sold in the markets of Cameroon as "bush meat," an increasingly popular food.


"The slaughter of chimpanzees and gorillas, our closest relatives, is absolutely diabolical. I can't imagine that this can go on much longer before these animals are extinct," warns Richard Leakey with the Kenya Wildlife Service.

But in Central Africa, the commercial trade in bush meat continues to grow. Markets teem with meat from many forest animals, including endangered chimpanzees, gorillas and elephants -- not as necessary protein sources but as delicacies.

Unrestrained logging, mostly by European companies driving new access roads into old-growth forests, makes the proliferation possible. Roads now penetrate deep into areas once inaccessible to hunters.

"It's the logging that's at the core of the problem. We would not have this dramatic increase in bush meat death and destruction if it weren't for the commercial logging," says Randy Hayes of the Rainforest Action Network.
Aerial of road
A new road takes loggers to areas once inaccessible

Some logging companies do more than build the roads; they take a role in the bush meat trade. They hire employees to buy the meat, supply hunters with guns and ammunition, and transport them and their catch between forests and markets.

Central African governments say logging companies have the right to expel poachers from their concessions. But many companies say that's not possible. Poachers are armed and dangerous, and only the governments have the power to solve the problem, they say.

"You need the collaboration of many authorities to be able to close the market," environmental activist Roger Ngoufo says.

But governments fail to enforce laws against illegal guns and the poaching of protected animals, environmentalists charge.

Worldwide attention needed

Photographer Karl Amman, who has spent years documenting the killings, believes only international action can stop the developing disaster.

"It will need political will. To generate political will, you need a major international outcry," he says.

Yet unless action takes place, the carnage will remain commonplace in Central Africa.

Leaving the main road and heading down a hunting trail, Amman identifies one such gruesome scene: except for the youngest, an entire family of chimpanzees has been cut into pieces.

"There should be concern expressed at every possible venue to bring pressure on both the African governments and on the international bodies to do something about this," Leakey says. "Unless this is stopped, these species could become extinct, and it would be a terrible loss to humanity."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Run To the Hills!
Posted by: dbatterman on May 11, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Apes have evolved and are able to file legal briefs! What's to stop them from going to law school now?!?
Seriously, this was a very good, tongue in cheek, but still thoughtful article. We could use more writers like this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Better grant human rights to all humans before we start looking to expand...
Posted by: ateo on May 11, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to other species.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporations can get it, why not chimps?
Posted by: thistleblower on May 11, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least chimps look like people. Corporations neither resemble nor think like actual people. They're rather more like robots with very vague controls. They ought to be reclassified as devices- if we wanted to we could go to court to have them "turned off."

But I digress... personally I think sentience is a continuum, not a got-it or don't-got-it sort of thing, so really, more species should be invited along for the ride. Maybe it would begin to seem absurd to make distinctions in the end, and we could move toward animal rights that applies to all species; humans would simply fall under that umbrella. It would certainly be more realistic as far as nature is concerned; it would put us in the humble position in the grand scheme of which we are really more deserving.

Good luck explaining that to a religious zealot or a neocon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Planet of the Apes" anyone?
Posted by: Bab5nutz on May 11, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although considering the amount of DNA that we share with chimps, Earth has been "Planet of the Apes" all along.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ha, ha, ho, ho...
Posted by: MartianBachelor on May 11, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
> I'm not just talking about a retroactive
> status applied to ex-husbands.

Nothing like a blatantly tasteless sexist jab to make a point about the evils of species-ism.

Guys who marry are chumps, not chimps. Big, big dif.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ha, ha, ho, ho... Posted by: morticia
» RE: Ha, ha, ho, ho... Posted by: psyorg
Spain also tried this
Posted by: Soco on May 11, 2007 10:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In which I wrote about earlier:

1. Is the Spanish Socialist Party doing this to gain more members?
2. Will our Simian friends use the Euro?
3. What will this do to the housing market?
4. Will this spark a Simian revolution for fair wages?
5. Ever heard of the Great Lawgiver?
6. Will Apes start giving humans lobotomies?
7. Why not ape-rights?
8. If Apes are given human rights, will they start killing each other too?
9. Will Apes in turn give lemurs rights and lemurs in turn passing them down thus completing the circle of life?
10. Do the Apes know anything about this?
11. Has the Spanish Socialist Party run out of ideas? The cake walk wasn't as successful as they planned?
12. Will the chimp represent itself or will it need a Pro Bono attorney?
13. Will they be drafted into the armed forces?

All this for a chimp that spends all day watching TV? Have we solved all the social issues for humans yet? Until then we should leave this alone.

Which reminds me I've heard some monkeys in India or somewhere are addicted to cigarettes, will this mean they'll be banned from restaurants and schools? I supposed giving monkeys human rights is secretly supported by tobacco lobbyists to increase their market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

*yawn*
Posted by: Boomerang on May 11, 2007 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another week, another useless article from Barbara Ehrenreich.

Why don't you just retire?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: *yawn* Posted by: talkville
umm..
Posted by: SjrBoomz on May 11, 2007 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe no one else has questioned this chimps ability to to take part in politics. This article fails to mention whether or not it is the chimp himself or the sanctuary that holds him that filed this request. I would assume that it would be the latter, as chimps have not proven themselves able to speak and write in complex human terms. As it is quite clear (to me) that this request was filed on behalf of the chimp by humans, this raises the question of how we are to know that he actually wants to be extended human status. I would think, pretending for a moment that I am a chimpanzee, that I would rather remain classified as my own species, reserving my species right to organize and govern ourselves without being interfered with by humans or any other species to which I do not belong. We humans have failed repeatedly to extend this right to other species, assuming that we have the right to interfere as we wish in their lives, often completely disregarding their interests. While this may not be right, extending human status to those who are not human is not the right way to go either for a number of reasons. First, we do not know whether or not they even wish to be considered "human." Perhaps to other species' "human" is a derogatory status to attribute a fellow, much as we consider it derogatory to be called an ass or rat. Second, even if they wish to be considered human this is a simple point - they are not. maybe we do share 98.2% of our genes, but that 0.8% has to mean something, and that something is that we are NOT the same species. We may be related, possibly have a common or mixed ancestry, but we are not now, nor do I believe we will ever be, the same species.

It is important to care for other species and the planet itself, but the way to do this is not by attributing false status to other organisms. Humans are humans, dogs are dogs, fish are fish, and chimps are chimps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is the most absurd AlterNet article I've ever read!
Posted by: TheTruthSeeker on May 11, 2007 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homo sapiens have nothing in common with chimps -- except, of course, for Bonzo Bush and Cheetah Cheny whose DNA is a perfect match.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about everyone else?
Posted by: shira on May 11, 2007 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
whether or not chimps get invited to join the human is family is kind of besides the point when that would mean the continued exclusion of all other species. as long as nonhuman animals are considered "others," they will continue to be objectified, commodified and exploited. this is the same problem i have with "the great ape project", which is a campaign whose goal is a "United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Great Apes." how about instead of fighting for the rights of those species most closely genetically related to us, we just give everyone the benefit of the doubt and stop killing/eating/wearing/experimenting on them? that would be something!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Forget It
Posted by: dayahka on May 11, 2007 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a bad idea. There are crucial genetic differences between the two species, among them the ability to reason and think. Emotionally we may be the same, but not cognitively.

Another reason this is a bad idea is that it is a step backward for the poor chimps...The human species is not worthy of being joined by a superior animal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Absolute superiority?
Posted by: janten on May 11, 2007 6:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"An epoch will come when
people disclaim kinship with us
as we disclaim kinship
with the monkeys."

- Kahlil Gibran, sufi mystic, poet, and artist (1883-1931)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Message for Haisl
Posted by: wisegalah on May 11, 2007 7:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you know what you are doing?
The levels of deceit, psychopathology, murder and sheer stupidity are much lower among chimpanzees.
Quit while you are ahead.

Wisegalah

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heinlein already wrote this story
Posted by: popsicle67 on May 11, 2007 10:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jerry was a man! Nuff said

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rhino poaching...Elephant PTSD...Wolf slaughter..ALL muct stop..
Posted by: ekipnrut on May 12, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[From Next Hurrah blog.....]:
March 05, 2006
The Right Not to Die Uselessly
by emptypockets
The Boston Strangler, in his youth, shot and killed dogs he had nt legislation is also active in Indiana.)
In California, attention was drawn recently to field coursing, a hobby in which owners let their dogs compete to catch a wild rabbit in an open field. The rabbit is chased for a few minutes, then pulled apart by the dogs for a minute or so.
Elsewhere, bills to let commercial fishing kill more marine mammals are under consideration; fur sales that had slumped after activism in the 1990s are back up to nearly $2 billion per year with mink production back to its 1980s peak; and of course there's always the seals.
But this post is not a call to abolish the killing of animals for hunting or clothing, or for food or research for that matter. In fact, it began as a tirade against radical animal rights activists who were convicted last Thursday of terrorizing researchers, including participating in pipe-bombing their labs, overturning their cars, smashing the windows of their homes, and threatening to behead their children. Separately, they also initiated boycotts and publicity work, which had the advantages of being both legal and efficacious. If they were not in prison, their energy might be well-spent applying these ethical tactics to decry truly useless deaths, of humans or of other animals.
Rousseau's dictum (which I misappropriate here) is that suffering, "being common to beast and man, should at least give the beast the right not to be uselessly mistreated by man" (pdf). Writing a century earlier than "Origin of Species," Rousseau based his reasoning on a recognition of humans as part of the animal world, an understanding that recently got lost.
"It's like looking at a wounded animal. It can sometimes have a capacity to strike out because it is wounded," Australia's attorney-general said of al Qaeda and Iraqi militants in 2004. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld used nearly identical language in late 2001 to describe the Afghan Taliban. The search for terrorists is routinely described as a "hunt," with enemy agents being smoked out, "on the run" with "nowhere left to hide," or in their "last throes." Animal-themed language has been used for prisoners in detention camps, as well as for Katrina survivors in the Superdome.
In Rousseau's time, "beast of burden" was not a song lyric -- he had real work animals in mind as much as hunting quarry. Today our beasts of burden are the poor, the dark-skinned; our hunting quarry are foreigners of other faiths. And Dick Cheney, and others like him, can bring about their useless deaths -- or the deaths, it seems, of that other modern beast of burden, the U.S. military -- with as little disquiet as they might charge a new mink, or fire a computer-controlled rifle.
March 05, 2006 at 13:50 in Contributor--emptypockets, Culture
....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You human beans make me itch.
Posted by: particle on May 12, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Critter rights! It's an interesting idea. I've met collies that are more human than some people, didn't make them Homo sapiens though.

People who believe that they've got ghosts lurking in their pumping blood muscles, that fetuses are more precious than Iraqi civilians, that some dude with a beard created the universe with magic words 10,000 years ago, that AGW defies common sense, are too damn ignorant to entertain the idea that other species can have some form consciousness, can suffer, can think after a fashion, can have intrinsic value.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You human beans make me itch. Posted by: blitzmesser
Hiasl for President!
Posted by: blitzmesser on May 12, 2007 10:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ditto :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hiasl IS President! (n m) Posted by: Aussie Kim
Rancid
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 13, 2007 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further steps on the road to species degradation.

Stick to "Nickel and Dimed."

That was good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Helpful and not helpful
Posted by: talkville on May 14, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a remainder. Over-all, this conflates a lot- biology, anthropology, taxonomy, physics, culture, society, economy, politics... . When the chimp itself demands rights, then let's welcome it to our "world". Not when there's a speaker for it; when it demands rights. Our own species has plenty, lots, much to resolve about ourselves. Inter- and Intra- refer to different things and processes. There is, so far, a remainder at the "genetic" level. If we, as a species (even by half a chromosome) have not even begun to resolve our own problems, as a species, we ought not to arrogate to ourselves the right to speak for or with other species. When each and every one of us has a decent, dignified, and developed mode of living in real time, this question will perhaps be moot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Helpful and not helpful Posted by: SjrBoomz
Mobile phones kill gorillas, too
Posted by: Aussie Kim on May 15, 2007 1:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The mining of coltan, used in mobile phones, is done in extremely remote areas in Africa and the miners are not paid much or given sufficient food supplies. So they eat gorillas. It's called "bush meat".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BillInPA
Posted by: BillInPA on Jun 1, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fifty years ago I read a great novel that relates directly to this article, "You Shall Know Them" by the French writer Vercors. It's so cheap on Amazon.com that I am going to get myself a copy now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]