Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Madness of the War Profiteering in Iraq

By Robert Greenwald, AlterNet. Posted May 10, 2007.


"Iraq for Sale" director Robert Greenwald explains to Congress that the billions that defense contractors and war profiteers are making out of the Iraq war is a madhouse run amuck.
Advertisement

The following is Robert Greenwald's testimony to the House Appropriations Committee, Subcommittee on Defense about war profiteering.

Thank you for inviting me to testify today. I appreciate the opportunity to share with you what I have learned in the course of making the documentary film, "Iraq For Sale: The War Profiteers." Along with my colleagues at Brave New Films, I spent a year researching the experiences of soldiers, truck drivers and families affected by the presence of private military contractors in Iraq. They shared with us their harrowing experiences of how military privatization and war profiteering have affected their lives, and in some cases taken the life of a loved one.

It is their personal stories that compel me to testify today. I am not a lawyer or a financial specialist or a government expert, but I can tell you from my extensive first-hand experience with these folks that something is seriously wrong. We are hurting our country and the many patriots who serve in the military. Our taxpayer dollars are being spent, abused, mis-used, and wasted on profiteers. It is a true tragedy, and it is costing the lives of Americans and Iraqis.

Please let me introduce you to a few of these people and their stories.

Imagine someone with the exact same job as you, working next to you, but getting paid three times as much as you! We heard this story over and over again from the soldiers we interviewed. And in the case of US Army SPC David Mann, a radio repair technician who served in Iraq, he was even required to train KBR contractors to replace him. In "Iraq For Sale," David shared his frustration:

"When I could be actively becoming a better soldier and becoming more proficient in my job, instead I'm going to sit up on guard duty and wait around while KBR contractors are doing the job that I had to train them to do."

US Army specialist Anthony Lagouranis also spoke of the effects of the private contractors on the military:

"It certainly affected retention because I don't know why any military person would re-enlist to do the same job when they could get out of the military and make six times the money -- I really don't understand why they were outsourced. I mean, it seems like this is a military job and the military should be doing it. Especially because the more civilians you have out there, the more military people you need to guard them. So we're spreading us thin."

"Iraq For Sale" was seen by hundreds of thousands of people around the country, and I cannot tell you the number of soldiers who saw it and thanked us for exposing the toll that contracting and profiteering are taking on our armed forces and on the war in Iraq.

I was also appalled to learn of the amount of waste by contractors in Iraq.

I remember clearly my interview with Stewart Scott, a former Halliburton employee. With pain and rage in his voice, he said how dare Halliburton put its people up at five-star hotels, while the soldiers, who he was there to help, were sleeping on the ground. I did not believe in him at first, but then he began naming the hotels and the locations. It was all true.

I also spoke with Shane Ratliff, a truck driver from Ruby, South Carolina.

He saw Halliburton advertising a job for truck drivers in Iraq and he signed up. When Shane started telling me that empty trucks were being driven across dangerous stretches of desert, I assumed he was mistaken. Why would they do that? Then he explained that Halliburton got paid for the number of trips they took, regardless of whether they were carrying anything. These unnecessary trips where putting the lives of truckers at risk, exposing drivers and co-workers to attack. This was the result of cost-plus, no-bid contracts.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war profiteering

Robert Greenwald is the director/producer of "Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism," as well as many other films. He is a board member of the Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's parent organization.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
History
Posted by: Crazy H on May 10, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In every other war we've ever had, congress has immediately passed a resolution against war profiteering.

Anyone care to guess why they didn't this time around?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Make your own History Posted by: Lincoln fan
Do you think that's bad?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on May 10, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The consider that these and other corporations control both of our political parties and our government.

You don't believe it? Click on Open Secrets. There you'll see who gives and who gets. There you'll find the same industries contribute to both parties. We can vote the parties out, but we can't vote the corporatocracy out. Elections are a farce and our votes only choose which party serves the corporate establishment.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who Dares Profits Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Do you think that's bad? Posted by: Davidco
» RE: Do you think that's bad? Posted by: werewolf
» RE: Do you think that's bad? Posted by: Lincoln fan
Warfare IS profit and power....nothing more.
Posted by: Michael Boldin on May 10, 2007 12:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The waging of aggressive war is just that - and tyrants have been doing it for centuries. They wage war to gain resources, land, and money abroad - and to increase their power domestically.

James Madison warned us of this over 2 centuries ago:

"Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.

In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied; and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people.... [There is also an] inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of war, and ... degeneracy of manners and of morals.... No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."


I can't see anything different from that and what Bush, Co. is doing today.

Some reading on this:

"Wars and Debts and Taxes, Oh My!" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney and Haliburton
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on May 10, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a letter from Sgt. Jon Lacore talking about the enormous amount of waste, he said, "I just can't believe that no one at all is going to jail for this or even being fired or forced to resign."

We have the major thug here. His parent organization is in Dubai. He was the one who insisted on no-bid contracts. I think congress should bypass impeachment and go straight to criminal proceedings against Cheney.

Otherwise, the depleted-uranium-cluster solution should be executed by someone!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How to get RON PAUL elected -- read this!
Posted by: anonimus1 on May 10, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How to become a delegate to the Republican National Convention --
http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/1991/ii911218.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Perils of Excessive Privitization
Posted by: sofla100 on May 10, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In WWII, Korea and Vietnam, few contractors were used and GI's did pretty much all the work. This included the truck driving, office and paperwork, cooking and cleaning. Today, however, virtually all of this, and more, has been given over to companies and contractors. Now, it is hard to believe that the military or government brass does not know what is going on here and the excessive waste this article points out . Also, how could anyone really suppose any company or contractor is not going to try to maximizing profits if at all possible? Don't they know that business is in business to make money. Alas, I would wonder just how many ex-government and military officers are on the payrolls of the Haliburton's and other contractors. What has developed, unfortunately, is no-doubt massive collusion and corruption stretching to the highest levels. And, that is why it is not stopping.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Congress needs to appoint a independent special prosecutor (if they can)
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 10, 2007 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recall what Clinton was impeached for? Lying under oath about a sexual tryst with a White House intern? Remember Ken Starr's all out witchhunt, supported by right-wing conspiracy mongers, that only came up with some association with a small land deal in Arkansas?

These corrupt crony contracts between the Bush Administration and their cronies in private business are a billion-dollar ripoff of taxpayer money. For a good overview, Sourcewatch and the Center for Media and Democracy has a good overview.

These same corporations are also the ones involved in the Katrina profiteering, attempts at privatizing municipal water supplies in the US and abroad - the list goes on and on. Bechtel, for example, got billions of dollars in 'reconstruction prohjects', was awarded the 'bid' for managing Lawrence Livermore nuclear labs (along with the University of California, BWXT nuclear technologies, the Washington Group fund, and Battelle Memorial Biowarfare Institute), and Bechtel was recently kicked out of Bolivia for trying to privatize their water supply, and is now partially involved in the effort to privatize California water through public funding of privately owned desalination plants.

This is just one of the several major crimes of the Bush Administration, which also include lying about nuclear weapons in Iraq so that they could start a war under false pretenses - and many more as well (such as the illegal NSA domestic spying program, the outing of CIA agents for political purposes, the firing of US attorneys for political purposes, etc. etc.)

The Democrats are doing a decent job of holding hearings on these matters, and the dirty details are coming out - but they need an independent special prosecutor, with a whole office of subordinates, to investigate this massive fraud.

See also Why A Special Prosecutor's Investigation Is Needed To Sort Out the Niger Uranium And Related WMDs Mess
By JOHN W. DEAN (2003)
:

Bush repeatedly, in his State of the Union, presented beliefs, estimates, and educated guesses as established fact. Genuine facts are truths that can be known or are observable, and the distance between fact and belief is uncertainty, which can be infinite. Authentic facts are not based on hopes or wishes or even probabilities. Now it is little wonder that none of these purported WMDs has been discovered in Iraq.

So egregious and serious are Bush's misrepresentations that they appear to be a deliberate effort to mislead Congress and the public. So arrogant and secretive is the Bush White House that only a special prosecutor can effectively answer and address these troubling matters. Since the Independent Counsel statute has expired, the burden is on President Bush to appoint a special prosecutor - and if he fails to do so, he should be held accountable by Congress and the public.

In making this observation, I realize that some Republicans will pound the patriotism drum, claiming that anyone who questions Bush's call to arms is politicizing the Iraqi war. But I have no interest in partisan politics, only good government - which is in serious trouble when we stop debating these issues, or absurdly accuse those who do of treason.


Now the Democrats have the power to do this - so what are they waiting for?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Leather on pavement time? Posted by: Knowmad
contractors and the selling of Iraq
Posted by: cwilsondrum on May 10, 2007 6:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
now what the fuck are the senate and the house going to do about it? and I don't mean wringing of the hands Henry Waxman and Pat Leahy have the right idea the rest of you get moving or find another job next election

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Election Funding Posted by: Veronique
» RE: lection Funding Posted by: Lincoln fan
Republicans or Democrats, It Doesn't Matter
Posted by: sofla100 on May 10, 2007 7:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, Haliburtion receives BILLIONS of dollars in Government contracts for its Iraq work. So do other companies, like Bechtel and Blackwater. Now, every politician in Washington is dependent on big money to finance his or her campaigns. That includes Obama and Hillary who have received millions.
Therefore, do you really think they will stop this, the corruption and waste, that they can stop it, or even want to stop it? The Republicans are bad, but at least you can see where they are coming from. The Dems talk up a big show, but like Hillary when the money started flowing in from the big banks and she reversed her opposition to "bankruptcy reform," they are just as bad or even worse than the Republicans. The public is easily fooled as Obama struts around giving so-called "straight answers." But, in reality, he is also bought and paid for, like the rest of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking of war profiteers: One more comment by Hugh E. Scott before quitting AlterNet.
Posted by: HughScott on May 10, 2007 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As my last comment (maybe!) before leaving the AlterNet gang for other endeavors, here is a topical article of mine that I posted Thursday on my investigative website, King-George.biz, the ONLY one with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

"America's REAL Commander-in-Chief"

Assume for a moment that George W. is what many detractors believe -- a presidential puppet with invisible strings pulled by someone on his White House staff. If so, who could the Oval Office Svengali be?

ANSWER: Shrub's side-talking sidekick, if course, not Karl Rove.

Look at Dick Cheney's background. Like Rove, he was a Vietnam War draft dodger but with loftier ambitions. Rather than a political guru, the future Veep wanted to be the man in charge, a leader.

Cheney had that chance by taking college ROTC at the University of Wyoming and becoming a commissioned Reserve officer, but there were two strikes against him. First, he looked like a nerd with his big head (literally) and pudgy body. Perfect road kill material for drill sergeants at ROTC summer camp.

The second strike against Cheney was his lack of bravery. What better way to avoid risky military duty and get ahead in life following graduation then by becoming a politician? And so he did -- in Washington, D.C. -- after five draft deferments, flunking out of college once and getting two DUIs on his driving record. Ideal credentials for a Beltway insider.

Cheney’'s rise to power in Washington was both remarkable and intentional as his official White House biography shows. In 1969, while other men his age defended freedom in Southeast Asia, he ran for cover in the Nixon administration.

When Gerald Ford assumed the presidency in 1974, Cheney served on the transition team and later as Deputy Assistant to the President.

In 1975, he was named Assistant to the President and White House Chief of Staff, a position he held throughout the remainder of Ford's term.

In 1977, Cheney was elected as Wyoming's congressman in the U.S. House of Representatives. His home state re-elected him five times. He also acted as Chairman of the Republican Policy Committee from 1981 to 1987 and was elected House Minority Whip in 1988. Cheney later served as Secretary of Defense in the Bush 41 administration.

The White House biography makes no mention of him running Halliburton where he obtained Defense Department business worth billions to the diversified oil company from the "single-source" no-bid contract system he created while DOD Secretary.

Also ignored by the official White House bio was his role on George W.s presidential campaign team during the 2000 GOP convention. Assigned the task of selecting candidate Bush's running mate, Richard the Chicken-hearted picked himself, completing his self-propelled rise to power as America's REAL commander-in-chief. A dream come true, unfortunately for 29,000 U.S military personnel killed and wounded in the Cheney/PNAC-promoted occupation of Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do you really think so? Posted by: Lincoln fan
It may not be Haliburton money...but...
Posted by: folkdude01 on May 11, 2007 3:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't groups like moveon.org, Brave New Films, and some of other anti-war media outlets "profit" off the war in Iraq as well?

The times I've gone to anti-war protests there are always merchants there plugging their group and their swag and to me, it's just as sickening as Bush thumbing his nose at the world and doing a dance while we're at war. In an ideal world, I think all the anti-war books, movies, documentaries, t-shirts, etc. should be done for non-profit. Now, I could be wrong about Greenwald maybe he sends a good chunk of what his films earn to charity. Now I wasn't able to find that information on his web site, if someone can point it out to me I'd be happy to take his name out of the mud.

There's a lot of profiteering going on off the dead soldiers and dead Iraqis in Iraq, from the right and the left, either way it's done, in my mind it's wrong. What do you think?

CC

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You don't have to buy their stuff. Posted by: colinmeister
Something rotten in the state of Denmark
Posted by: allblue on May 11, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has always been corruption of course, but before it had to take place in the shadows, with cautious glances over the shoulder in case the law was upon them. The blatancy, the out-there-in-the-open-for-everyone-to-seeness of it all today should be ringing every alarm bell that there is loud and clear. Where is the outrage? Even in this thread people are shrugging their shoulders, 'move along, nothing to see here'. This is I would suggest a serious existential crisis for the United States. This disinterested attitude amongst the populous alone alone would be bad enough, but more than that where is the structure to stop it? There is the DOJ, the FBi, senators, congressmen - but what are they doing about it (apart from profiting personally I guess), by what means can this naked theft be stopped? Why isn't this story the main topic on all the TV news programmes this evening? Who or what is there to demand accountability? Is there a single core value left? The structure has gone it seems, and all that is left is the institutional corruption. That, my friends, is the definition of a Failed State.
To make things worse, this is borrowed money that is being so flagrantly stolen, it's not just your tax dollars being dump-trucked on board the last train to Corruptionville, it's your grandchildren's and your great grandchildren's, it's the very future of your country being stolen in front of your eyes. Oh well, whatever.
Incidentally, in case you had forgotten or were not aware, on September 10th 2001 Donald Rumsfeld announced (rather casually I thought) that an internal audit at the Pentagon had discovered $2.3 trillion, I'll repeat that, $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon's books. That works out at about $7,500 per capita, every man, woman and child. Obviously the events the next day rather pushed this story out of everybody's minds, events which included a plane hitting the Pentagon's accounting office, resulting in the deaths of 65 Pentagon employees, 34 of whom were accountants. Oh well, whatever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing New Here
Posted by: Philip Newton on May 14, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Old as the hills.

And it ain’t gonna change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]