Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Brisk Trading in Racist Furnishings and Home Decorations

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted April 30, 2007.


Swapping, selling and collecting a huge array of racist furnishings and home decorative pieces is a brisk and lucrative business.
Advertisement

Doris Moore's first thought probably was it was a joke when she looked at the label on her newly purchased couch. Whatever amusement or puzzlement she may have initially had quickly turned to horror when her seven-year-old daughter asked her what the words meant. The tag on the dark brown couch's upholstery clearly read "nigger brown." Ms. Moore hit the roof. The furniture store, the supplier, the manufacturer, and the shipping company feigned ignorance or passed the buck. Finally, Kingsoft Corp., a Chinese software firm, admitted the error, but loudly protested that there was no racial malice intended. The company blamed the racial slur on a computer glitch.

That may be, but it's no mistake that swapping, selling and collecting a huge array of racist furnishings and home decorative pieces is a brisk and lucrative business. These items adorn thousands of American homes. There's a Coon Chicken Inn dinner plate, and a little Black Sambo block. They sell for hundreds of dollars. An original Aunt Jemima Cookie Jar can net upwards of $2,000. There are hundreds of counterfeits on the market. They sell for only a few dollars. The original Jolly Nigger Bank made in the early 1900s sells for hundreds of dollars at auctions. Even the hundreds of fakes of this grotesque little item are sold at swap meets and on the Internet for a few dollars.

Then there's the Sambo Dart Board. The All Metals Products Company, an outfit out of Michigan, originally made it in 1940. Fifty years later the AAA Sign Company in Ohio reproduces the Dart Board as a decorative tin sign and mass markets it at about $15 dollars. AAA Sign also makes, and sells, hundreds of wall clocks, ashtrays, and plates emblazoned with choice depictions of Sambos, Mammies, Toms and Coons. There's more than one kitchen where the cook lights up their stove with matches from matchboxes that have Nigger Head shrimp, Nigger Head oysters, and Mammy Brand oranges on the box cover.

The sale in racist furnishings is so good that many other countries have jumped into the business. Fake Jolly N Banks, for instance, are made in Taiwan exclusively for the American market. Japanese and Korean manufacturers have also churned out thousands of racially offensive products. The racist couch that shocked Moore was made in China. These items are more than just historical curiosity pieces. They are almost certainly the butt of jokes, scorn, ridicule, and are used to degrade African-Americans by many that sit, lie, or gaze at these items in private homes. That's exactly what they were originally intended to do. The sale of racist collectibles with no disclaimer, or warning, and with no attempt made to sensitize buyers and sellers to the historic damage these items still wreak on African Americans is a tragic mix of commercial irresponsibility and racially tinged indifference.

It also reflects the dangerous and mistaken notion that racist collectibles that portray the tom, coon, and mammy image of blacks merely reflect a by-gone era when blacks were viciously and publicly racially mugged. A century ago, newspapers and magazines had great fun ridiculing, lampooning, butchering and assailing blacks in articles and cartoons. They were branded as "lazy," "brutes," "savages," "imbeciles," and "moral degenerates." Plantation songs, tales, and slave caricatures were wildly popular up until World War II. The Uncle Remus "darky" character immortalized in Walt Disney's classic Song of the South was wildly popular on the screen, in tunes, and in stories then, and today as well. Quaker Oats continued to peddle the bandanna wearing, fat, dark-skinned mammy image of black womanhood on its pancake boxes until 1989. That era is far from past.

Legions of college fraternities have been nailed for holding slave auctions, minstrel shows, and displaying the Confederate flag in front of frat dorms, and for their members sporting the flag on tee shirts. A lengthening parade of politicians, sports figures, celebrities, and shock radio talk jocks have been called on the carpet for making racist wisecracks, jokes, tongue slips, and flat out slurs of African-Americans. Don Imus got the ax after the national furor finally convinced top sponsors to cut and run from the shock jock. That sealed his doom. But the battle against racist stereotypes in TV and films has been brutal and endless.

Museums, art houses, and private collectors, including many African-Americans, routinely buy, sell, and swap racist furnishings too. They use the racist pieces to educate the public about the terror of America's vile, and shameful racist past. They also act as a constant reminder that that past can rear its hideous head time and again. However, thousands of other Americans that plop their dollars down for racist furnishings, as well as the manufacturers of them, aren't interested in their historic value, or in making and using them to educate others on the danger of racial intolerance. They're interested in making a buck even if means demeaning blacks. That can't be blamed on a racist computer.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: collecting, shopping, racism

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social issues commentator, and the author of the book, The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press, September 2006), a hard-hitting look at Bush and the GOP's court of black voters.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How Many Comments Before...
Posted by: stagolee on Apr 30, 2007 4:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many comments will be posted before some miscreant complains about 'whiny blacks'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hopefully, many Posted by: talkville
Furniture Manufacturer gets a pass?
Posted by: weirdone on Apr 30, 2007 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everything else, we get a brand name, and it seems to be a pretty obvious offence, anyways--how does the company that sold Ms. Doris the couch merit anonymity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Join the club, dude.
Posted by: Celtaban on Apr 30, 2007 7:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah, yes - the degrading portrayals of one's kind. Women know it well. Unlike African-Americans, however, we're laughed at and shrugged off when we complain - told not to be shrill, and bitchy, and to just get over it. Or maybe the problem is that we're just dykes.

In graduate school, I pointed out to a teacher that the so-called "canon literature" we were required to read portrayed women in a way that would have been considered odious if one substituted generic black characters for the women (we called them "black" in the 80's). So why was sexism art, but racism evil? He dismissed me with a laugh; it wasn't even worth discussing.

What if magazines dedicated to racist stereotypes stared you in the face at convenience stores, instead of porn? Would that be acceptable? Would it be beautiful? Just part of human nature? Artistic expression, celebrating the black form?

Wanna talk about cigarette lighters, t-shirts, mud flaps, tattoos, billboards, booze ads, half-time shows, postcards? The image of women in every stage of undress and invitation is ubiquitous; there's no space too small or too large for the purpose. This is the message we women get from every direction; this is what we're supposed to be.

How is this more acceptable than images of mammys and uncles, little dark children, watermelons?

Certainly the racist stuff is disgusting. Fortunately for those it exploits, it's not everywhere you look. If you want to know what that would be like, stare at the next billboard you see with a half-naked woman on it, and picture her as a grinning black woman with a head scarf and a watermelon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Join the club, dude. Posted by: JBailey
» RE: Join the club, dude. Posted by: tigerlilly
» RE: Join the club, dude. Posted by: pdxlinuxchix
» RE: Join the club, dude. Posted by: mizani
» RE: Join the club, dude. Posted by: yellow
» RE: Join the club, dude. Posted by: mizani
» Unfortunately, it's not a club Posted by: talkville
Has no one noted that the sudden plethora of racist junk is a redneck
Posted by: yellow on Apr 30, 2007 10:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
backlash to the candidacy of Barak Obama for President in '08. The racist messages are an effort to stir up sublimated racism in order to create an atmosphere that is difficult and indeed toxic for black candidacy for US president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What to do about this?
Posted by: colinmeister on May 1, 2007 3:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These items are obviously distasteful to readers of Alternet and many other people, but they are still selling well. The question is what to do about it.

Given the U.S. First Ammendment, banning them is probably not an option, and even if it was, it is not, in my mind, a desirable one - if these things are banned for being in "Poor taste", what would be the next things banned using the precedent?

The easiest thing would be to reveal the manufacturers and importers of these items, along with other products these companies manufacture and import, and for all people who dislike the racist items to boycott all other products made or handled by these companies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What to do about this? Posted by: mobile68
» What's wrong with bougie? Posted by: dwatkins9
» RE: What's wrong with bougie? Posted by: mobile68
racism is not only for African Americans
Posted by: ellie on May 1, 2007 4:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
look at all the fake (most recently imported from Asia) and insulting American Indian images (selling like hotcakes) on the market when American Indian craftspeople are shut down for not being 'authentic'... if the ideal type and stereotype doesn't match the 'Dances With Wolves' image to maintain the fantasy, we are pushed out of the way (suicide, jail, murders etc)... we are relagated to 'historical images' and are treated as such, not worthy of maintaining our tribal cultures in today's society... I can go on and on.........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Antiquing
Posted by: Allison on May 1, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw a couple of these at the antique shop the other day - old tobacco ad posters, one showing a couple of large-lipped black youths kissing behind and umbrella, the other showing two similarly-stereotyped rural men hunting rabbits. Both probably date from the early 20th century, but I was afraid to ask how much they were going for (antique shop proprietors scare me). I thought they were pretty offensive, even if they are not likely to reflect the views of most people who see them today, and it was troubling to see them for sale.

I guess I'd see a problem with white yuppies owning these items as curiosities, which is what seems to happen to most antiques. They ARE (disturbing) pieces of history though and probably should be in an academic or museum collection rather than being sold to some chump.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Antiquing Posted by: byjose
Check out the Jim Crow Museum
Posted by: perri6 on May 1, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a coincidence. I came across this website the other day while searching for racist 19th century board games. It's VERY informative. I also listened to a podcast (12/7/01) featuring the museum's curator Dr. David Pilgrim on why he collects such memorabilia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racist Or Deragatory?
Posted by: hole11 on May 1, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hutchinson throws around the "r" word like Al Sharpton. Must be a trend. I am just trying to figure out how an object can be racist. Just because of a word or the way it appears? I even fail to see how colors arranged on a flag could be racist. I remember seeing lawn statues of black golfers. Is that racist? I mean it didn't look like Tiger Woods but is it offensive? I can understand how an image would be derogatory and more so if it was part of a comic. I am not sure if the Cleveland Indians baseball team logo is racist but it sure looks strange. I have yet to see any other image of an indian smiling. Should I be comparing it to smiling blacks eating watermelons? Someone is making money off of the images but it isn't everywhere like some of those sport teams. I am still waiting for someone to call their basketball team the Nappy Headed Hoes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: acist Or Deragatory? Posted by: mizani
displaying the Confederate flag in front of frat dorms
Posted by: Bubba3000 on May 1, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The title of the article is "Brisk Trading in Racist Furnishings and Home Decorations". Just how is "displaying the Confederate flag in front of frat dorms..." a racist furnishing or home decoration?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If your home is your dorm.... Posted by: talkville
» The Confederate Flag is not racist Posted by: LiberalRedneck
» RE: The Confederate Flag is not racist Posted by: LiberalRedneck
» No more responses? Posted by: xconservative
Let's not get carried away...
Posted by: zipper696 on May 1, 2007 1:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author writes:
"They are almost certainly the butt of jokes, scorn, ridicule, and are used to degrade African-Americans by many that sit, lie, or gaze at these items in private homes. That's exactly what they were originally intended to do"

Whoa up there! "N*gger Brown" was a listed fashion colour (at least in the UK) right up to the end of the 60's and would be on colour pallettes for interior decoration as well, so let's not draw racist conclusions too readily.
Similarly calling a black dog or cat "N*gger" was not unusual, I can recall many cats of that name in my 40/50's London childhood - this at a time when there were virtually NO blacks in the country at all, so a racist motive seems hard to sustain.

I suspect that the Chinese manufacturers simply had a collection of old style and colour swatches with the names printed on and used it without any harmful imtent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

eye opener
Posted by: lamar on May 1, 2007 4:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure why, but purchasing for thousands of dollars an antique piece from the racist era seems, in a vacuum, OK, but to buy a recently made replica is just disgusting to me. Of course, the context of the antique and how it is displayed could most certainly be vile. Aside from a purely academic setting, I can't see any reason to display fake antique racist furniture. I get frustrated because black writers and leaders always say "you don't know what it's like" and my patience wears thin, then I read an article like this and I realize that I really don't know what it's like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That Last Paragraph Tell Me...
Posted by: hole11 on May 1, 2007 8:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Hutchinson would buy some KKK robe and prove to his siblings that there were people who were hateful and hid behind masks because they didn't want to be recognized and lynched by a politically correct public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try being a black female construction electrician.
Posted by: mobile68 on May 1, 2007 11:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you really want to see some hate against women, go on a construction site. Or in any other male-dominated field such as the railroad, where women are the in the minority. The hate increases when the skin of the female gets darker.

The sad part is that women and people of color in this so called x-tian-democratic-freeist-society-in-the-world called the u.s.a. are still being discriminated against in the work place by mainly white men, since women and people of color were finally ALLOWED to work jobs that are not low-paying and female dominated only 30+ years ago. It seems to me that the more women and people of color advance in white-male dominated careers, the white male got to ratchet up the hate.

Someone please explain to me why is it mostly white men who:
-Is being paid $200+ million to do a half ass job of running the largest companies in
america?
-Are the owners of major league football, baseball, and basketball teams?
-Are the commissioners of the major field of sports?
-Are the majority that heads colleges, universities and hospitals?
-Dominates the police and firefighter forces?

Why are there only a hand full of women and only one black senator in the u.s. senate 200 years later after the establishment?
What is the big deal about if a woman, or a woman/man of color becomes the leader of a country that supposedly prides itself on being a melting pot?

So whatever the rappers are saying about women, it has not affected me earning a living yet. It's the racism and misogyny that have and is still being practiced by white men, who heads most of all the major companies and businesses in this country, that affects my bottom line.

My how we have progressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Emblems, Museums, Zoos, Collecting.
Posted by: talkville on May 2, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about appropriation. It's about expropriation. It's about enclosing. The ex-otic and the erotic. Value and the valorization of value. The Hip and the Hop. Ego and Super-Ego. Sex, race and class. And that Beautiful Home fit for Architecture Digest or Vogue. Ah, Caligula!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You haven't been paying attention
Posted by: Mrs. Robinson on May 2, 2007 3:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think porn is all about sex and pleasure and has nothing to do with racism, you've obviously been hanging out in the wrong corner of that little room behind the curtain at the video store.

There's a very large, very popular genre of porn that features well-endowed black men -- sometimes solo, sometimes in groups -- getting it on with white women. Apparently, watching women be "humiliated" by being "taken" this way is a real turn-on for a certain classes of men, both white and black. I can think of several possible reasons for this; every last one of them has its roots in racism AND sexism.

Proving other races "inferior" by emphasizing their allegedly unchecked sexuality goes back thousands of years. Alongside Jemima and Sambo, there was always the big black buck -- broad-shouldered and hung, cursed with an unrestrainted sexual appetite, a latent rapist who might at any moment grab some lily-pure white woman and defile her with his half-breed spawn. His female counterpart was the breeder -- an African woman with no sexual boundaries who dropped babies that no man would help her look after. (Our modern welfare queen goes back centuries.)

Those are the stereotypes that are being perpetuated in this genre of porn. Frankly, I'm surprised the African-American community hasn't protested loudly at this kind of objectification. I can see where some black men may find this flattering (evidently, there's no shortage of African-American men ready to drop trou and show the goods for the camera) -- but they're kidding themselves.

African-Americans are not going to be true social equals as long as there's a large population of white men who still profitably get away with perpetuating the big black buck stereotype -- and porn is selling that one for a million bucks a day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hutchinson Manages to Outdo Himself
Posted by: faultroy on May 2, 2007 5:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This must be Huntchinson's most moronic hysterical and wacky column yet. He manages to surprise even me. I wonder how long he had to contemplate this article in order to come up with the mind numbing lead to this column--a computer glitch from a chinese company is racist? Aw C'mon please get your self inflated head out of your ass. All this company was trying to do is to sell its products. Let's begin with the definition of Hutchinson's "taboo word", "NIGGER." My Wesbster's New World Dictionary, circa 1968, defines "nigger," as a dirty unclean person with no reference to the color of a person's skin.
Furthermore, a book by an auther of Mountain Man Trappers during the 1820's--to 1880's continually have these mountain men as referring to themselves as "niggurs." The point is that until our black literary effetes championed removing the word "nigger," from the American Lexicon --even though blacks consistently use it among themselves and have no problem with it-- the term "nigger," was used to refer to low class whites as well. Today, the term "nigger" as used by whites has been supplanted with the term: "trailer trash."
The problem we have with the black middle class and especially the black intelligentsia is they believe only they are the "annointed ones," able by "divine decree," to discuss anything related to racism. And, like little boys playing the game: "My dick is bigger than yours," they insist on these juvenile "I have the moral high ground," whines with way to much gusto for my moderate tastes.
Fact: Racism is not racism when it is not intended to be racism. For something to be racist, it must be intended to be racist. When one collects Americana for the sake of Americana, it is not racist. If a German honors the memory of his father and grand father, sisters and brothers dying during World War Two, that does not necessarily make him a hater of Jews. Nor, does a Southerner honoring his forefathers and Mothers that flew the Confederate Flag make a "Racist." Racism is what is in the heart of a man, not keepsakes that he has in his home.
It is certainly legitimate for black writers to highlight and discuss racism in this country or any other, but it does nothiing to further the black movement in the USA by having these little morality patrol hacks diluting the reality of both overt and covert racism. As a matter of fact, it tends to close the minds of people that are open to resolving racial issues by presenting blacks not as individuals truly seeking racial equality, but whiny little bitches interested in self aggrandizement at society's expense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I can only wonder... Posted by: xconservative
White People vs. Cracka Bastards .. bad for Black People's mental health
Posted by: neosoul on May 2, 2007 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see why Hutchinson is writing an article and trying to get these insenstive white conservative/liberal types to see the humanity in another human being. Doc I got news for you, white americans love being blissfully igorant about African- Americans because it gives them comfort not to know anything about black culture that is not on their t.v. screens. They remind me of what Chris Rock once said in a stand- up routine in his N- word vs. Blacks also can be applied to "Whites Vs Cracka Bastards" as well.

"Cracka Bastards love not knowing Shit" and that's a fact Doc, ask any black person the difference between a "nornal white person" who is curious about African - American culture and history and it's people who may be a tad bit in the dark of black cultural traditions but you can tolerate with some understanding but a "Cracka Bastard" just loves being igorant about what Black Folks do about issues (that is about 68% of the white american population) and tries to use words like whiny, weak, and use black guilt stats to reject any legitimate debate on 'cracka bastard' racist/ insenstive attitude and let's not forget committing politcal necrophillia on Dr. King's corpse everytime they speak his name (hey "cracka bastard" make sure you wear a condom when you open up the casket to screw King in his butt) where his words don't mean a thing but rote B.S.

Don Imus is just the tipping point, African- Americans of all classes in the past 15 years have griped, written letters and have had conversations about the imagery in some rap music and videos but the 'cracka bastards' love to say that blacks practice a 'double standard when it comes to that type of behavior because Black Men use it all the time to their women. Like 'cracka bastards' have entree into black homes, parties, and social circles. I have personally never called a woman a "ho" but have used bitches many times to describe men and women who act like a diva or pain the ass.

Trying to get "cracka bastard" to be at least sensitive to the history of this country and to at least think before they open up their mouths and say something utterly ridiculous or racially insensitive as in this issue about negative Black Collectibles is a waste of time and basic intelligence. If you can reach the 32.5 percent of white Americans who are at least listening with eyes and hearts open you did your part Doc, But Cracka Bastards are a waste of time and effort and only will give black people hypertension, prostate cancer, depression and many other ailments.

Cracka Bastards are bad for a black person's mental health. Sorry but I am not going to deal with these people because repeated debates may make you end up like Cho at Virgina Tech.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Racism is taught
Posted by: mobile68 on May 3, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
White people need a heavy dose of that bitter pill called racism given to them in an IV so they can feel the full effect of what they unjustifiably dish out to people of color on a daily basis. It's almost like it's a religion for most of them to be racist. The thought for them of being a minority group within a society, or being just one white in a group of people of color frightens most white people to no end. That's why they can never comprehend what it like to be a person of color in this world. Human beings have the capacity to change, but can or will that person change if need to?

I admire those white people (mostly the females) who can and do empathize and realize that the only difference in human beings is skin pigmentation, and that skin pigmentation does not define a person's chacter. But for most white people, to have that type of empathy, that equates to a loss of power and control. Look at the t.v. shows and news casts across Amerikkka and what do you you see? One person of color and the rest all white. Is that why people of color are considered "minorities" ?

And the one that kills me is how most white people will justify their racism towards people of color by saying they are unaware of having racist tendencies or it's in their subconscience to be racist. Poppcock! Racism is taught! A few examples:

-My 5 year-old daughter was playing in a sand box and this white boy who was about the same age as her wanted to play w/her. So his mom was sitting on the bench opposite of me and she and I thought it was cute. So comes along the boy's oldest brother and he said "Dad is going to get you for playing w/that black girl!" They mother turned beet red and apologized profusely.

-Why is it when the white people come into the land of the brown people, the brown people treat the white people like guests, but how do the white people thank the brown people for their hospitality? Rape their women, shove their religion down the brown people throats, kill them, and take all of their possesions. Story sounds familiar? All one has to do is look at Africa, New Zealand, North, Central, and South America, etc.

-The U.S. has the biggest arsenal of high-tech weaponry in the world, way surpassing every other country. It has military bases spread all over; most countries have no troops outside their borders. Also, the U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Over 2 million people are locked up in the prison system each year, most of them people of color.

All of this which leads to my point of a human being is not born a racist, it is TAUGHT, and how to reinforce the racism? Like religion, you have to keep drumming it in the heads of the people that you want on your side and produce artifacts that people will buy to support that movement.
The best antidote to this tragedy is to supress the white male narcissistic-supremacy-mentality, by building a movement for profound social change, replace capitalism with socialism, christianity with humanity, so that people’s energies can be directed at solving the great problems depressing so much of humanity today, whether they be wars or global climate change or the loneliness of the dog-eat-dog society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brisk Trading in Racist Furnishings and Home Decorations
Posted by: puerto on May 12, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brisk Trading in Racist Furnishings and Home Decorationsshiting - scat galleries this comment pooping scat fetish bestiality tgp - beastiality pictures gay animal sex bestiality videos farm animals vidio chat - hardcore porn streaming video free hardcore lesbian sex bisexual anal - 2007 march 18 dilatation anal anal fissure mature anal sexy bikini models - massive cock first big cock first big cock sex pictures drunk hardcore party - lesbian sex girls kissing party stripper party games GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED chubby porn - chubby girl mature amateur showing her natural tits gang bang party - no comments rape stories porn movies gangbang movies

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]