Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A Global Democratic Movement Is About to Pop

By Paul Hawken, Orion Magazine. Posted May 1, 2007.


Something earth-changing is afoot among civil society -- a significant social movement is eluding the radar of mainstream culture.
05012007story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Paul Hawken

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I have given nearly one thousand talks about the environment in the past fifteen years, and after every speech a smaller crowd gathered to talk, ask questions, and exchange business cards. The people offering their cards were working on the most salient issues of our day: climate change, poverty, deforestation, peace, water, hunger, conservation, human rights, and more. They were from the nonprofit and nongovernmental world, also known as civil society. They looked after rivers and bays, educated consumers about sustainable agriculture, retrofitted houses with solar panels, lobbied state legislatures about pollution, fought against corporate-weighted trade policies, worked to green inner cities, or taught children about the environment. Quite simply, they were trying to safeguard nature and ensure justice.

After being on the road for a week or two, I would return with a couple hundred cards stuffed into various pockets. I would lay them out on the table in my kitchen, read the names, look at the logos, envisage the missions, and marvel at what groups do on behalf of others. Later, I would put them into drawers or paper bags, keepsakes of the journey. I couldn't throw them away.

Over the years the cards mounted into the thousands, and whenever I glanced at the bags in my closet, I kept coming back to one question: did anyone know how many groups there were? At first, this was a matter of curiosity, but it slowly grew into a hunch that something larger was afoot, a significant social movement that was eluding the radar of mainstream culture.

I began to count. I looked at government records for different countries and, using various methods to approximate the number of environmental and social justice groups from tax census data, I initially estimated that there were thirty thousand environmental organizations strung around the globe; when I added social justice and indigenous organizations, the number exceeded one hundred thousand. I then researched past social movements to see if there were any equal in scale and scope, but I couldn't find anything.

Reprint Notice:
This article appears in the May/June 2007 issue of Orion magazine, 187 Main Street, Great Barrington, MA 01230, 888/909-6568, ($35/year for 6 issues). Subscriptions are available online: www.orionmagazine.org.

The more I probed, the more I unearthed, and the numbers continued to climb. In trying to pick up a stone, I found the exposed tip of a geological formation. I discovered lists, indexes, and small databases specific to certain sectors or geographic areas, but no set of data came close to describing the movement's breadth. Extrapolating from the records being accessed, I realized that the initial estimate of a hundred thousand organizations was off by at least a factor of ten. I now believe there are over one million organizations working toward ecological sustainability and social justice. Maybe two.

By conventional definition, this is not a movement. Movements have leaders and ideologies. You join movements, study tracts, and identify yourself with a group. You read the biography of the founder(s) or listen to them perorate on tape or in person. Movements have followers, but this movement doesn't work that way. It is dispersed, inchoate, and fiercely independent. There is no manifesto or doctrine, no authority to check with.

I sought a name for it, but there isn't one.

Historically, social movements have arisen primarily because of injustice, inequalities, and corruption. Those woes remain legion, but a new condition exists that has no precedent: the planet has a life-threatening disease that is marked by massive ecological degradation and rapid climate change. It crossed my mind that perhaps I was seeing something organic, if not biologic. Rather than a movement in the conventional sense, is it a collective response to threat? Is it splintered for reasons that are innate to its purpose? Or is it simply disorganized? More questions followed. How does it function? How fast is it growing? How is it connected? Why is it largely ignored?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: global, social movement

Paul Hawken is an entrepreneur and social activist living in California. His article in this issue is adapted from Blessed Unrest, to be published by Viking Press and used by permission.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
So... -
Posted by: RoffleTheWaffle on May 1, 2007 1:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I missing something here, or does the author of this article really seem to think that the concept of social and environmental activism is totally radical and new? This isn't some amazing new political movement, this is the ongoing battle against injustice that's been carrying on since the dawn of human history. Of course there are millions of people making up millions of activist groups. What's so hard to believe about that, and why was that not completely obvious to this guy?

That said, it was an okay article, but the concept of activism is hardly news to anyone here. Some new 'global democratic movement' is not about to 'pop', there are just a lot of upset people in the world today who are willing to take action to further whatever causes they've taken up in the name of the greater good. (And it's awesome that people are willing to go out and do that, don't get me wrong.) I love it how the author says this 'movement' - and by movement, he means 'millions of largely unrelated activist groups' - flies under the radar, too. Look, when your organization of some two dozen people tops doesn't even try to gain media exposure, the media certainly isn't going to come looking unless you do something absolutely amazing.

Get real, dude.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So...yeah, Roffle, you missed the point Posted by: irreverentprimate
» RE: So... - Posted by: Realman
» RE: So... - Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Print-A-Card Activism
Posted by: edith on May 1, 2007 1:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author sure has a lot of cards. I'll bet some of the people on the cards have been on a lot of cards, indeed, if the author wanted to really waste his time, he would find that many of these "nonprofit" heroes bounce from group to group. This is an alternative universe to the dead federal bureaucracy that administers billions in the name of education, health, research and "defense".

Basically, these organizations are conduits for corporate profits to escape taxation under the ruse of benevolent causes that the wealthy support to ease their consciences and to employ their kids and friends who want to "give back" or whatever the trite social phrase of the day is. The powerlessness of the interests these organized nonprofits represent is greater than ever. The good news is that these tax dodges allow the real estate developers in DC and nearby Virginia to build up even more office complexes, gentrify more neighborhoods, and spark the opening of more Starbucks(green coffee, Man) and bars/clubs for the young activists too lazy to earn engineeering degrees and actually do something like build roads and housing.

That "dirty" work is done of course by the Bad Private Sector. Of course that's where the profits come from so that this quasi socialist network of do gooders can continue to "network", go to useless conferences, and further vegetate (in an organic way, of course.).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Print-A-Card Activism Posted by: Ghostsmachine
» Networking For Jesus Posted by: edith
» Aww...Shit Edit.. Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» Oink Oink, I Presume? Posted by: edith
» RE: Print-A-Card Activism Posted by: mommy64
» RE: Print-A-Card Activism Posted by: Doubtom
Sigh...
Posted by: Erik1968 on May 1, 2007 2:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish this were true. Sadly, this is exactly the problem. Top-down groups with lots of cards, who truly mean well, but end up being a sort of sad extended peace corps.

I remember when this happened last time. Does anyone remember Earth Day 1990? When we all joined together to fight for the environment? Corporations, grassroots groups, and top-down enviro NGOs came together to save the planet.

So what happened? It was a smokescreen. It had to be, just as this has to be. I predict that if we get a new "green" administration like we thought we were getting in 1992, (How does Al Gore look in the mirror? How???) the same thing will happen. There will be compromises. The environment will lose again. There will be saber rattling that China must cut emissions first, since they make everything now. There will be cute ways for consumers to "shrink my carbon footprint" while corporations burn more coal.

Remember? We all started recycling, never stopping to wonder why nobody just outlawed single serving bottles and cans? That's going to happen again. Because nobody's going to meetings. Our $35 or $50 or $100 checks aren't buying much advocacy. They're buying a road to compromise.

Sorry to be a drag. Prove me wrong, America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sigh... Posted by: Realman
Money changes people
Posted by: metamind on May 1, 2007 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I joined one of these groups back in the 1980's. Our mission was to advance the peaceful uses of space to solve global problems. But we ended up spending most of our time chasing after money from rich people and the rich people wanted us to battle Ronald Reagan on his "Star Wars" initiative. Our mission changed because of money as I suspect happens in many of these organizations.

Money makes us into "enlightened warriors" with a cause. But the cause gets corrupted by money. When are we going to recognize that the economic system itself is the problem?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Money changes people Posted by: psychochurch
How about that
Posted by: kittyhegemann on May 1, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the cynics who have posted, I have noticed the same thing the author is writing about in his article. These aren't the organizations you often see. Here in the US they are very diverse. They are reading groups that become active in their home towns. They are local organizations exploring land use policies. They are gardeners who try organic and are surprised at how good a crop they have and how great the food tastes. They are homeowners who install a solar system to cut back on the damage caused by coal powered electricity generation. There are groups all over the world who are just trying to make a small difference. The stories are out there if you just look. For those who just can't see it, I think you joined an organization or movement. That's what the author is saying. It's not a movement or organization. The people of this world are moving forward without the governments or the multinationals or anyone giving us permission.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about that Posted by: Centavo
» RE: Kitty, Centavo and heid Posted by: irreverentprimate
» RE: How about that Posted by: Doubtom
Finally, some hope.
Posted by: heid on May 1, 2007 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those who have complained that the article isn't realistic, doesn't describe what's really going on - please, reread it. The author is pointing out that there are really people out there doing something. They aren't sitting on their duffs. They aren't joining organizations with big ideas. They aren't talking. What they're doing that's so special is just that - they are DOING.

And this is what matters. In spite of the odds. In spite of the politics. In spite of the corruption. In spite of corporations, WTO, World Bank, IMF - in spite of it all, people are getting involved and developing a new way of approaching life on earth.

This is the first hopeful thing I've seen, and I'm just thrilled.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wold government is coming...
Posted by: Scientz on May 1, 2007 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...do you want their version, or shall we make our own flavor?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

China
Posted by: LeaderofMen on May 1, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those people with all their cards. If they were 'smart' they would be lobbying Congress - and doing it HARD.

Here's why.

We've exported a tremendous quantity of business to China. The idea was they're cheap and when they produce the waste of manufacturing they will sully their own land.

Well, it's a double-edged sword, isn't it. They've surely damaged their environment because they have no environmental controls over there. But their CO2 emissions are destroying the ENTIRE PLANET.

So, if all those card-carrying environmentalists were 'really' smart, they'd be finding ways to bring back all those jobs. You see, no one's going to stop consumerism. They might slow it down, but it's surely not going to stop until the population is under control. So, if you want to be truly environmentally conscious you'd bring the jobs back here, and create environmentally conscious ways to manufacture products - and then working hard to EXPORT all those proven technologies back to China. That way you kill all the birds with your advanced stones.

Otherwise, they're just chipping away at a mountain. A mountain that refuses to move due to our moronic Republican administration that is absolutely sure that we're living in the Last Days and everything is meaningless anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: China Posted by: flipside
» RE: China Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: China Posted by: babs
Read David Korten's book "The Great Turning"
Posted by: greentime on May 1, 2007 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People around the world are smart.
It is those who lead for greed who don't get it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not going to happen...
Posted by: Kennedy on May 1, 2007 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is nothing more than the “cattle” getting nervous. Back to the old: 20% leaders vs 80% followers (Chomsky). The people getting involved in this movement are all followers (cattle). Without the assertiveness of leadership, they will wander aimlessly for generations, accomplishing nothing. They will never enter the leadership class until they get natural leaders involved in this movement. The Corporations hire the leaders (20%) and give them a piece of the action.

“Cattle” always get nervous when things go south, and things are definitely going south – fast, now. But until leadership joins these “movements”, nothing will ever happen accept aimless worry and concern.

The “Cattle” are not that smart. Even though new tools now exist, to communicate knowledge (blogs, chatrooms, email, cell phones etc.) the "cattle" use these for gossip and porn. When you think everybody is “connected and talking” they are just really connected and talking about American Idol.

Sorry, I wish this wasn’t the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not going to happen... Posted by: mommy64
Peter Challen
Posted by: Peter Challen on May 1, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is important to distinguish between responding to symptoms of societal insanity and tackling the causes. A lucid article on this challenge lies on www.savingcommunities.org/issues
The sheer weight of good people tackling symptoms, (as we must) and the dedication in their commitment, often blinds us to how ineffective we are in tackling the causes. Monetary Justice is the root to which we must reach, even while we hack at the branches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Peter Challen Posted by: setterwoman
We still must unite politically
Posted by: Rebel with a cause on May 1, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please keep in mind that while all our diverse environmental and social change groups are happily meeting to green our little corner of the Earth, evil people in Washington, DC, are busily destroying hundreds of thousands of people, animals, and the land itself. We must replace these maniacs politically while that is still possible.

How can we do that if we're not in agreement and unified behind real people with a workable plan? But which plan? Whose plan? Choose wrongly and you get - we all get co-opted, sold out by another professional politician who tells you what the polls tell him or her you want to hear, but then he or she does what serves his/her agenda, not ours.

Until we unite to vote out of power all those in Washington who use militarism to impose our will on the world, none of us are safe. Hillary is no better than the NeoCons, nor is Pelosi, nor Edwards nor Obama - they all serve the Military-Industrial Complex and AIPAC.

If you want to know why our good jobs have moved to countries like China and India, read Harry Browne's Why Government Doesn't Work. It's all there.

We need a better system of government, but it's not more stifling socialism, with its bureaucracy consuming 70+% of our production.

If we who love humanity and the Earth can't unite to remove those who hate from positions of power, all our lovely gardens and children will not survive the wars we are being dragged into.

If we all vote for 4 or 5 different parties in 2008, we'll change nothing. Again. The drive to War will go on.

We must unite to restore Life, Liberty, and the Freedom to Pursue Happiness. The Libertarian Party is the best foundation for a peace and freedom coalition to make the change. Check them out: www.lp.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ah, towards anarchism Posted by: talkville
Wasting time
Posted by: Darrell Kern on May 1, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that these organizations love the press and media attention they get as well as the "love" they recieve for their efforts. The moment the camera turns off- their collective efforts stop and they begin sifting through piles of paperwork and beauracratic bullshit.

Imagine all the paper it takes to make all those business cards!

It so obvious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Spot on! Posted by: Bobsays
Multitude by Hardt and Negri
Posted by: getoutofiraqnow on May 1, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author writes,
"By conventional definition, this is not a movement. Movements have leaders and ideologies. You join movements, study tracts, and identify yourself with a group. You read the biography of the founder(s) or listen to them perorate on tape or in person. Movements have followers, but this movement doesn't work that way. It is dispersed, inchoate, and fiercely independent. There is no manifesto or doctrine, no authority to check with.
I sought a name for it, but there isn't one.
Historically, social movements have arisen primarily because of injustice, inequalities, and corruption. Those woes remain legion, but a new condition exists that has no precedent: the planet has a life-threatening disease that is marked by massive ecological degradation and rapid climate change. It crossed my mind that perhaps I was seeing something organic, if not biologic. Rather than a movement in the conventional sense, is it a collective response to threat? Is it splintered for reasons that are innate to its purpose? Or is it simply disorganized? "

This and what is written in the rest of the article is exactly what is theorized in Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri's book "Multitude" . Just as the rulers are now a global "Empire" (another book of theirs) who are less the political leaders and more the faceless multinationals dispersed all over the world, the multitudes are people who have differences but cooperate among themselves as a new form of social resistance.

It is difficult to summarize this book, but worth reading if you want to understand more about these dispersed movements on a global scale that fight for the environment, indigenous rights and against globalization/corporatization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on May 1, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I liked the article, and I hope many non-religious readers will forgive me for touching on religion again: I sense a religious dimension in all that's going on...like God is working beyond the Churches and religions to establish The Kingdom of God, a reign of Peace and justice all over. Other articles today seem to fit this pattern too: like the call for a union movement on a global level, and on women and Latinas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: Dboy
Does realism now always equal pessimism?
Posted by: apple pie on May 1, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know we live in somewhat hopeless times. The list of maladies is endless and appropriate. But I think what Hawken was trying to describe has to do with a new radicalism of leaderlessness.

I just read a review of a book about cultural death and creative survival called Radical Hope:Ethics in the Face of Culttural Devastation by Jonathan Lear that touched upon some of these issues...just about to order the book thru Powells....

People commomly involved in preserving the planet, justice, and some basic dignity in the face of what at times seems to be overwhelming greed, despotism, and horror is a widespread and disorganized phenomenon. And true, some of those individuals, have less than humble notions of themselves and are manipulative and are damaging.

Still, though, if we are to live...than we need to work with the implicit understanding that others are doing similar work, to live and to survive. I am not talking here of bandying business cards, or attending protest rallies that the media ignore, or contacting represenatives that are owned by ExxonMobil. I am talking here about seeing an attainable object of planetary survival being possible because of work done by you, by me, and by countless others whom we don't know and will probably never even meet.

And maybe that is our unconquerable strength.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope. Posted by: talkville
If we don't take back our government nothing will be done
Posted by: Truthsoldier on May 1, 2007 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But These groups will only be allowed to go so far before they hit a brick wall, and then they will be stopped by big oil, giant corporation's, and our own government.

No matter what the people may want to do if we do not have control over our own government it will not happen they will stop it.

There are some people in this world that are such lowlife forms, that they will not save this planet if it cuts into their profits, that is exactly what the bush baby has been saying all along they will continue to use and abuse because we have no control over our own government.

just look at what the bush baby has done while he has been in office, talk about crimes against nature and the environment , and there hasn't been anything we can do to stop him because we have no control over our own government we do not live in a democracy the people have no say .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Most working in civil society working for themselves
Posted by: Bobsays on May 1, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a human truism but most of these people are working for themselves. It is why many problems like poverty persist in so many countries. In places where the NGO model is not the main model (China or South Korea or Singapore) we see (saw) massive gains.

While it can seem at first as if progress is being made attending an endless round of gab fests and conferences around the world, and collecting business cards, as Shakespeare once said: 'all sound and fury signifying nothing'.

We now live in an age of the greatest number of NGOs ever. We also see conflict and misery all around us. It is worth questioning if what is really keeping so many down and out is more to do with the profound fracturing of human endevour than by 'letting a thousand tulips bloom'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your motivation?
Posted by: Knowmad on May 1, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that naysayers, and others who just have to find fault, leap up screaming at every positive sign, often - astonishingly - more fervently than they attack the negatives. This post is a good example. The author here unveils a very simple set of progressive, helpful actions that reasonable people are taking part in, and this just seems to sail right over these seemingly mindless protesters' heads (I won't go into detail on the reasons for this - just keep insecurity/fear in mind).

They just can't seem to get it: TRUE CARING IS ALWAYS A GOOD THING (note "true").

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your motivation? Posted by: redjenny
Removing the mote from one’s own eye...
Posted by: Torgo on May 1, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Permanent Things, by Paul Hein, MD

I read this article last week and was floored by its beauty and simplicity and lack of pretension.

When I was younger, I burned with resentment at the flagrant injustice in the world. It still rankles me, but with less urgency. I no longer flatter myself that I can do anything about it. The Beatitude has assumed new meaning for me: Blessed be those that hunger and thirst for justice! The blessing is upon those who hunger and thirst, not necessarily achieve. The lesson, so slowly and painfully learned, is that justice may be too much to expect in this world, except occasionally, or by accident.

Society is disintegrating around me, and I know the causes, and could do something about it. I’m not bragging; you could probably say the same. But I couldn’t do it alone; we’d have to work together. Ultimately, we’d have to establish some sort of organization that would be powerful enough to compel respect for the law and individual rights. In other words, a government! Good grief! I know better than that! How many times have I said that power corrupts, inevitably, yet to remedy the corruption of today, we would need power that would corrupt us tomorrow.

Evil can best be fought by moral suasion, not physical force, or the threat of it. Those who would reform the world ought to begin by reforming their own lives.

The secret to reforming the world may lie in sublimating one’s passion for social justice into a search for personal perfection.

Don’t tell me that for evil to triumph it is only necessary that good men do nothing. No one "does nothing." Even a person in a coma provides an opportunity for a caregiver to perfect himself or herself. Removing the mote from one’s own eye is not doing nothing; it is, on the contrary, the first step in a revolution that could turn the world upside down, if enough of us did it.

I recall a teacher (was it Aristotle?) telling us, in college, that art was "anything done well." Let each of us mind his own business, and do what he does well, making us artists! Life could be simple and sweet, and no one need be hurt.

Let the revolution begin within!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, jumping in the river to rescue the people washing by is good.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 1, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But it's better (more effective) to take a walk up the river and find out who is throwing them in.

Unless people take political action, it is like bailing out the boat with a bucket full of holes. We need good laws. (note the "good").

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The most interesting thing about this article...
Posted by: JoshM on May 1, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is that Mr. Hawken has compiled a large database of information about environmental organizations. If he would also share some information about their size, focus, funding sources, tactics, geographic concentration, etc., this would all be useful information to have. (I agree that Mr. Hawken doesn't display very much of a sense of the history of the environmental movement in this article.)

As far as the comments about whether NGOs are good or bad... well it depends doesn't it? Are you talking about the Rockefeller Foundation or Greenpeace? I like Bill Moyer's MAPS model for how different kinds of activist organizations can support each other in a broader movement (although arguably it's a very America-centric model.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He Has Posted by: sdlamm
Sounds like
Posted by: bluepilgrim on May 1, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a collective consciousness, system intelligence, group mind, social interactionism, the world-wide meta-brain of our species.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

john polifronio
Posted by: johnp on May 1, 2007 9:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A significant social movement is eluding the radar of mainstream culture(?)" It's humorous, the lengths media professionals will go, to conceal their complicity with "mainstream culture," which has bought their silence. "Significant" social movements, do not "elude" mainstream media. In fact, virtually nothiing of importance eludes mainstream media. Media professionals, are just that. They're professionals at sensing and grasping, especially, the major events in our culture. If any eluding is going on, it's media that are doing it, not the other way around. But, nothing is more common than the "we didn't notice" pretense media professionals give us, in these matters. The important thing to these guys is, whether the social movement appeals to their big shot, media employers, and not whether the social movement is important to millions of media consumers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To the imbecilic attackers of environmentalism!
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on May 1, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here, imbecilic attackers of environmentalism. Here are recent victories of just one powerful organization! Sure it's a large one...but what can a million worldwide orgs do! I WAS impressed and surprised by the article and happy about its worldwide portent. Much power and success to them.

NRDC Recent Achievements

TWO VICTORIES FOR LATIN AMERICAN BIOGEMS!
We've made a major leap forward in our ambitious campaign to protect one million acres surrounding the world's last unspoiled gray whale nursery at the San Ignacio Lagoon in Baja, Mexico. The Mexican government has announced that 109,000 acres of federal lands surrounding this spectacular whale habitat will be donated for conservation. In 2000, NRDC activists helped defeat Mitsubishi's plans to build the world's largest industrial saltworks on these same lands. Mexico's recent donation will seriously undermine any future attempts to revive the plan.

ACTIVISM
Far to the south, Chilean environmental officials have rejected a deeply flawed study of the impacts of a proposed hydroelectric dam in one of Patagonia's most pristine areas. The officials announced their decision less than a week after receiving more than 10,000 protest messages from BioGems Defenders. In March, NRDC BioGems advocates joined Ecosistemas -- one of our main partner groups there -- and the internationally renowned Chilean rock musician Beto Cuevas on an expedition to the region. They met with environmental leaders and local community activists and visited Chile's biggest river, the Baker, which has been targeted for two dams by the country's largest utility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wanted: True Believers Posted by: edith
» RE: Wanted: True Believers Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
To the imbecilic attackers of environmentalism, Part2!
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on May 1, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just one powerful organization working in DC and NYC did the following! Looking forward to a million working the world!

For more than three decades, NRDC has fought successfully to defend wilderness and wildlife and to protect clean air, clean water and a healthy environment. Here are some key victories NRDC has achieved.

1971 - NRDC wins passage of the Clean Water Act, which allows citizens to sue polluters directly
1973 - NRDC begins action that wins phase-out of lead in U.S. gasoline
1976 - NRDC litigation wins limits on water pollution for 24 major industries
1978 - NRDC wins fight to remove ozone depleting CFCs from aerosol cans
1978 - NRDC launches fight against acid rain through lawsuit which cuts sulphur dioxide emissions by a million tons annually
1980 - NRDC leadership helps win federal protection for one hundred million acres of Alaskan lands
1984 - NRDC wins litigation to compel the Department of Energy to comply with environmental laws at all of their nuclear weapons facilities
1985 - NRDC helps win adoption of national efficiency standards for consumer appliances, saving billions of dollars in electrical bills
1987 - NRDC initiative leads to International Treaty to save ozone layer
1987 - NRDC lawsuit forces Bethlehem Steel to pay $1.5 million in penalties for water pollution
1991 - NRDC helps defeat U.S. Senate bill that would open Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to unnecessary oil drilling
1993 - NRDC legal action forces two oil giants, ARCO and Texaco, to cease water pollution and pay stiff fines for past violations
1994 - NRDC saves eastern North America's largest untouched wilderness by helping the Cree defeat the James Bay hydro-electric project
1999 - NRDC helps win commitments from over 200 companies, including Kinko's, 3M, Starbucks, and Home Depot, to help save temperate rainforests by phasing out their use and sale of old-growth wood products
2000 - NRDC's worldwide campaign forces the Mitsubishi Corporation to abandon its plan to construct a massive salt factory next to the last unspoiled breeding ground of the gray whale
2001 - NRDC helps secure an agreement among logging companies, environmentalists, native peoples and the government of British Columbia to protect millions of acres of the Great Bear Rainforest -- home of the rare white Spirit Bear -- from logging.
2002 - Working with a coalition of environmental groups, NRDC goes to federal court and blocks the Bush administration from allowing oil exploration in thousands of acres of public wildlands next to Arches National Park in Utah.
2003 - NRDC wins a federal court case stopping the worldwide deployment of a Navy sonar system that would have blasted oceans with noise so intense it could maim, deafen and kill whales.
2004 - NRDC takes the Bush administration to court and blocks its dangerous plan to allow 20,000 aging power plants, refineries and factories to spew millions of tons of pollution into our air.
2005 - NRDC staves off the Bush administration's attempts to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.
2006 - NRDC legal action leads the Bush administration to propose protecting the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act -- a crucial first step toward saving the bear from the ravages of global warming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Strength in numbers . . . .
Posted by: MAD on May 1, 2007 10:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These movements are full of sound and fury; signifying nothing, to quote a famous English playwright. I admire the few, core idealists who look after America's waterways, promote sustainable agriculture and advance solar energy, but ultimately they are accomplishing very little with the mom and pops/NIMBY method.

In fact, they are accomplishing far too little, too late. With so many mini-groups advancing such disparate agendas, they [each] necessarily end up approaching the problem from a position of weakness. Most of these agencies/organizations are ignored outright primarily because they lack the financial means and political clout to pursue any meaningful litigation. And make no mistake, it all boils down to money and how it is used to gain exposure and leverage.

I wish them well, but until such time as idealists of the world unite and shed the chains of pikerdom to form one superorg that confronts these problems according to an internal, democratically determined hierarchical agenda, then it will continue to be more pissing of small contributions down the drain.

My solution would entail establishing a global, environmental congress that pools the monies of all the lesser organizations (or better yet receives the money directly) and disperses it according to the dictates (votes is a better word) of the elected members from each country. The election process would undoubtedly get complicated and objections to how the money is dispersed would certainly arise, but the clock is ticking and sooner or later we have to narrow the focus to what is most pressing. Global warming perhaps. Maybe alternative fuels? I don't know, but drops in the sea are not going to change anything especially when the sea swallowing those drops is comprised of corrupt and ruthless government bureaucracies of monstrous proportions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Strength in numbers . . . . Posted by: jbwestwood
» RE: Strength in numbers . . . . Posted by: richholland
Shift away from centralized authorities.
Posted by: alienghic on May 1, 2007 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The core theme of this article, to me, was that a host of decentralized social change organizations are forming.

Which makes sense, I'd just been reading Global Guerrillas which fairly convincingly argues the thesis that terrorist and other insurgent groups are successfully switching to a decentralized confederation of loosely allied groups.

Or San Fransisco has the phenomena of these self-styled bedouins, who are working for themselves out of various coffee shops. The traditional business model of a company being able to afford employees for extended periods of time has weakened enough there that these workers are now function as independent contractors who will come together in loose-knit project based companies if needed.

My interpretation is that our communication infrastructure has gotten to the point where since everyone can know pretty much everything that everyone else knows, the more ad-hoc de-centralized organizations are trouncing the central authority figure. (Who previously had a monopoly on being able to collect local information from around an organization and tease out the big picture.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Small, independent decentralized organizations are far more effective than the 'majors'
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 1, 2007 11:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the large environmental organizations are apparently incapable of tackling the fundamentals, and seem to spend more and more of their efforts on cosmetic touch-up efforts. Sure, they do some good things, but they are incapable of turning the tide.

By focusing on their own local areas, these small groups can be very effective - they can force city councils to fund renewable initiatives and stop short-sighted developers from ruining their communities, for example. They can require local transportation systems to use clean, non-fossil fuel energy resources.

You can see how effective the small groups are by looking at how much effort the major corporations and banks spend to defeat them. The fact is, it's a lot harder for a corporation to deter, disrupt and shut down 1000 small groups than it is to affect one large group like Greenpeace.

Instead of sending $100 to Greenpeace, spend that $100 on organizing your own small group - but make sure you get your facts right before you plunge in. Don't be tricked into attacking your friends, in other words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not enough
Posted by: bandido on May 1, 2007 12:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's great, but the bees, monkeys, turtles, fish, frogs and hundreds of other species are being decimated by loss of habitat, cell phones, chemicals, and probably a thousand other by-products of industrialization, and climate change of course, and war, and it doesn't seem that all these millions of groups can really stop the devastation. Slow it down a bit, but how do you stop materialism? These groups are a tiny fraction of the world's population bent on getting all they can get while the getting is good. China, for example. Do you think that one millionth part of the population of China gives a damn?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing Big...
Posted by: TWilliams on May 1, 2007 2:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heck, Hitler was a huge environmentalist. The Nazi's even had laws on how to boil lobsters. Pretty sick. It is sad to see liberals are moving down the same path.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nothing Big... Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: Nothing Big... Posted by: famouspipeliner
The number of groups is the Problem....too many instead of uniting!!
Posted by: elfinito on May 1, 2007 2:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there are so many groups...with so many people, why can't this happen quicker?

The problem is that the masses are easily swayed and control everything...meanwhile intelligent people get caught up in the diverging minutia of their activist ideas...and thus never unite against the corporate-advertising-brain-washed and mass-media-spoon-fed masses that continue to stifle progress while the activists and thinkers focus on their niche and quible over the details.

What we need is someone to take the 10,000 business cards and get those groups together to put together a real movement that will grab the attention of the masses...instead of 10,000 small groups "flying under the radar."

I don't like what Gov. Schwarzenegger said...but its is the sad reality...if environmentalism (or any movement) is to succeed is has to become part of our mass-media pop culture. Unfortunately the majority of Americans are not well educated and will never move beyond the hip, pop-culture trend of the day. Though these groups and anecdotes are heart-warming to hear they mean nothing as long as the movement continues to stay under the radar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lenin Lives! Posted by: edith
» RE: Lenin Lives! Posted by: elfinito
» RE: Lenin Lives! Posted by: richholland
America's gift to the world
Posted by: willymack on May 1, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Certainly isn't in the person of a demented halfwit, posing as our president, our bellicose foreign policy, or our profound ignorance as a people; it's an IDEA. This idea stood up pretty well until the neocon criminals overthrew our electoral system through fraud, lies, and voter intimidation and disenfranchisement and forced a lamebrained puppet upon us-not once-but TWICE, and we let them get away with it. Let's face it; enough of us have forgotten the IDEA that made us great, and we're losing everything that once made it so great to be Americans. The IDEA will survive elsewhere, and maybe spread throughout the world someday, while we at home sink into decay and become a third world mess, with a dictator telling us what to do and think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deep Context - Poor Comprehension
Posted by: nuet on May 1, 2007 5:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comments to this article reveal a general ignorance of the context of Paul Hawken's effort. This is one of many articles seeded in preparation for the launching of the book and video, BLESSED UNREST, and the WISER platform for collaboration.

As an activist for 50 years, I have long been a critic of activist attitude to the need for improvement in their comprehension and behavior. They have contributed to the mess we are in, not by intention, but by not being willing (as most humans) to examine themselves deeply enough.

Paul and the WISER organization, I believe, have discovered a vital phenomenon and are prepared to utilize their new knowledge to assist the activist movement to become orders of magnitude more REESEE (Relevant, Effective, Efficient, Sufficient, Enjoyable, and Elegant).

This is NOT a final solution; it is a NU beginning. Breathe deeply and absorb, then integrate and emerge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edit, forgive me.
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on May 1, 2007 9:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please accept my apology for what I said early in my morning under "Aww...Shit Edit.. " Shame on me. I guess I had not had my first cup of coffee. You are DEFINITELY not imbecilic. Again, please accept my apology.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can only hope...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on May 1, 2007 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
<