Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

America Since 1980: A Right Turn Leading to a Dead End

By Dean Baker, AlterNet. Posted April 27, 2007.


Economist Dean Baker's new book lays waste to the Reagan Revolution's unprecedented assault on working Americans' economic security.
bakercover

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dean Baker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Editor's note: this is adapted from Dean Baker's new book, The United States since 1980 (The World Since 1980).

U.S. politics took a sharp turn to the right in 1980 with the election of Ronald Reagan as president. Domestically, Reagan touted an agenda that would lead to a sharp upward redistribution of income. Internationally, Reagan explicitly rejected the "détente" framework for engaging the Soviet Union that had been accepted by the leadership of both major parties since the beginning of the Cold War. In its place, Reagan put forward a doctrine of U.S. unilateralism in which the United States basically claimed the right to do whatever it wanted, unconstrained by allies or international institutions.

The welfare state in the United States was always weaker than in West Europe, but in 1980 it was reasonable to believe that West Europe presented a model that the United States would follow. Medicare and Medicaid were still relatively new programs, having been established just 14 years earlier. Having recently seen a massive expansion of publicly provided healthcare coverage, many people believed that it would not be long before healthcare coverage was extended to the entire population. Other features of European welfare states, such as long vacations, short work weeks, and paid parental leave (generally maternity leave at the time), also seemed feasible political goals.

Reagan's election changed the political reality. His agenda was rolling back the welfare state, and his budgets included a wide range of cuts for social programs. He was also very strategic about the process. One of his first targets was Legal Aid. This program, which provides legal services for low-income people, was staffed largely by progressive lawyers, many of whom used it as a base to win precedent-setting legal disputes against the government. Reagan drastically cut back the program's funding. He also explicitly prohibited the agency from taking on class-action suits against the government -- law suits that had been used with considerable success to expand the rights of low- and moderate-income families.

The Reagan administration also made weakening the power of unions a top priority. The people he appointed to the National Labor Relations Board were qualitatively more pro-management than appointees by prior Democratic or Republican presidents. This allowed companies to ignore workers' rights with impunity. Reagan also made the firing of strikers an acceptable business practice when he fired striking air traffic controllers in 1981. Many large corporations quickly embraced the practice. Also, his high dollar policy in the mid-'80s was a severe blow to manufacturing unions, who suddenly had to compete against low-cost imports that were essentially subsidized by an overvalued dollar.

The net effect of these policies was that union membership plummeted, going from nearly 20 percent of the private sector workforce in 1980 to just over 7 percent in 2006. Inequality soared, as the vast majority of the gains from economic growth over the next quarter century went to high-end wage earners (e.g., doctors, lawyers, CEOs) and profits. The wages of typical workers increased little from 1980 to 2006.

On the international side, Reagan followed through on his campaign promise to reject the arms control agreements that previous administrations had negotiated with the Soviets. He insisted on going back to the drawing board and negotiating proposals for arms reduction, not just freezes. While Reagan eventually found a more accommodating enemy than he had anticipated when Mikhail Gorbachev came to power in the Soviet Union, his belligerence towards the Soviet Union was a deliberate break with prior administrations.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: reagan, baker, economy

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Screw The Gipper
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 27, 2007 1:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Make no mistake about it: America has to come with terms with its sick, dysfunctional relationship to Ronald Reagan. The damage that that dirty old bastard did to this country is so immense, it will never be accurately assessed - it's incalculable.

Everything George W. Bush has done to you, Ronald Reagan tried to do to you and would have done to you had his party had control of both houses of Congress. Fortunately we had to wait until January 20, 2001 for that to happen.

It must be remembered that Ronald Reagan's was a freindly looking, amiable mask, with a twinkle in its eye and a fine Irish smile. Remove that mask and you have the disgusting, hideous smirk of George W. Bush. That is the real face of the so-called "Reagan Revolution.


Pray for peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It wasn't Reagan Posted by: xi_people
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: xbj
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: Sushi
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: xbj
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: xbj
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: RODNOX
» RE: It wasn't Reagan Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Screw The Gipper Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Screw The Gipper Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Screw The Gipper Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Screw The Gipper Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: Screw The Gipper Posted by: LeeAnnG
» Hello LeeAnnG! Posted by: Tom Degan
» the word "filthy" Posted by: goatini
Why Reagan won?
Posted by: Temporary on Apr 27, 2007 2:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll tell you! He was SMART! Smart enugh to scare the Soviets with weapons he dind't have, and also smart enough NOT to take the American army to war, BEFORE it was ready! He also built a military buildup mostly on lies and depth, but it worked! China is now doing THE SAME THING wiht you! All they have to do is to launch a missile somewhere, and you go INSANE! Eventually you will lose your nerves, and either blow yourself up or go broke! Now you know what it feels like!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why Reagan won? Posted by: xbj
» RE: Why Reagan won? Posted by: nopuppy
» RE: Temporary Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Why Reagan won? Posted by: bob t
» RE: Why Reagan won? Posted by: bob t
» RE: Why Reagan won? Posted by: bob t
Reagan created Timothy McVeigh
Posted by: astockton on Apr 27, 2007 3:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Gipper said, ad nauseam, "Government is not the solution to the problem, government IS the problem," he all but invited an unstable person like McVeigh to take fixing the "problem" into his own hands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yikes! Posted by: Russ Wellen
It's more about history than karma.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 27, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder whether the fall of our empire and the rise of others was inevitable, despite our attitudes and behaviors since 1980.

Maybe Reagan and the current climate are signs of a desperate empire already in decline before 1980. Anybody can be rich. Forget about Vietnam. We can change Russia and the Middle East. Just say no...It's our version of watching gladiators, eating until we yack, feeding Jews/Christians to the lions, and simmering in hot baths while we still can, or whatever.

China, and whoever else, won't beat us because we've been bad, but because they'll be the new bullies on the block. They will beat on any country they can, regardless of how nice they've been, just like the Romans, the British, the US, Russia, and other empires have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» GOVERNMENTS ARE MORTAL Posted by: ssegallmd
Come on. Dutch wasn't THAT bad!
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 27, 2007 4:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I manage a Bushwhacking investigative website with 70 illustrations. One is a chart showing the distribution of capital income in the United States from 1979 to 2003. I’m looking at it right now.

During the Reagan years, during which the Gipper RAISED taxes four times, the top 1% of Americans received 38% of the nation’s capital income, while the bottom 90% got 24%. The ratio remained relatively constant until Gulf War 1 started.

That year, 1991, the income gap suddenly widened and has continued to so ever since -- even after George W.’s 2001 tax cut.

By 2003, the top 1% of Americans got 58% of total capital income while the bottom 90% received just 13%. The numbers don’t lie. We are rapidly becoming a two-class, Have and Have-not society that started on Bush 41’s watch, not the Gipper’s.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That says it all. Posted by: buh
» RE: Come on. Dutch wasn't THAT bad! Posted by: edgar_michel
The Vast Rightwing Conspiracy
Posted by: shangrilalad on Apr 27, 2007 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do you call it when a Republican president packs every department and agency of government with political appointees who oppose and usurp every law and regulation that represent the very purpose and objective for which an agency was formed?

Reagan and Bush’s political appointees weren’t selected to enforce existing laws, they are selected to subvert the will of congress and sabotage the law from the top down. If that isn’t proof of a Vast Rightwing Conspiracy, what is?

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ronald Reagan, second worst president ever
Posted by: sausage on Apr 27, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only reason Ronald Reagan doesn't get the prize, worst president ever, is because he's been knocked out of the top spot by the current occupier of the White House.

From what I scanned, Dean Baker is the first writer, in any discipline, to squarely place the blame for the genesis of the long, slow demise of the American middle class and American prestige in the world on the administration of our acting president. For many years now I have said to my circle of friends that future historians will look back on the Eighties in puzzelment. In many regards Reagan was a poor president whose policies were disastrous for the country, especially the working middle class; yet, mostly through the legerdemain of his "cowboy" foreign policy, he was, and remains, enormously popular with a public that is being crushed as a result of his procorporate, proglobalization economic policies.

Let us hope that Baker's book is only one of many reassessing an administration which promised to make the United States a shining city on a hill but, in reality, pushed it to the brink of moral and economic bankruptcy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Paul Craig Roberts Posted by: fanny666
» Let us hope that Baker's book is Posted by: Lincoln fan
The worst president of the 20th Century
Posted by: nopuppy on Apr 27, 2007 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Make no mistake, history will confirm that Ronald Reagan was the worst president of the 20th Century. Yes, worse than Nixon. Worse than Truman. Worse than Wilson. Worse than Coolidge. For Reagan was John the Baptist to Bush's would-be Christ. Without Reagan, the two Bushes would have been impossible. And so, of course, in our looking-glass world where reality is always the opposite of the hype, Reagan is touted as the greatest president of all and people weep at mention of his name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Preamble
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Apr 27, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hold these truths to be self evident:

1. Politics and economics are two sides of the same coin.
2. The corporate establishment has taken control of the leadership of both political parties and thus controls our government regardless of which party's in power.
3. Because the establishment controls both parties, our votes only decide which politicians carry out the agenda of big business.
4. The voters won't control the government until we take control of both parties. Then our votes will decide which party will carry out the agenda of the people.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Preamble Posted by: dayahka
» RE: Preamble Posted by: sphoenix
» RE: Preamble Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Preamble Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Preamble Posted by: edgar_michel
» RE: Preamble Posted by: sea4th
Strictly on a Gut Level
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Apr 27, 2007 11:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Statistics aside, after Reagan became president, what it felt like to be an American changed. Apartment rents, not to mention the price of homes, shot through the roof.

Suddenly, everyone in American was forced to think of money -- all the time. We all had to sink or swim as budding financiers. The country became mean-spirited.

It all started with breaking the air traffic controllers union.

If this comment is even less intelligible than my usual posts, that's because I'm dealing strictly with an impression that I experienced in my thirties.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Straw Poll? Posted by: NthnBrazil
» RE: Straw Poll? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Straw Poll? Posted by: sea4th
» RE: Straw Poll? Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Straw Poll? No reality Posted by: drblack
» RE: Straw Poll? No reality Posted by: drblack
Right Turn to Delusion
Posted by: edgar_michel on Apr 27, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article and I hope all Americans read it. America is in dire straights, and because of the de facto media black out in the United States, few Americans realize just how dire the situation is.

9/11 was designed to engage the average American in the defense of their country. This administration knew that the economic outlook was bleak at best because of America’s loss of control of oil energy resources pricing. The Iraq war was supposed to give the United States an operations base in the Middle East so that they could offer support for the Saud’s bid to retain control to the oil resources of Saudi Arabia, in return for some advantageous control of the flow of oil. Since the American people would not be moved to commit to the military engagement of Iraq without some significant prompting, 9/11 became a necessary evil that didn't involve that much loss of life when compared to most other historical political movements.

This was done to defend the twenty some years of folly begun by Ronald Reagan, extended by George H.W. Bush and perpetuated by George W. Bush, and it all had to do with oil and the insane insistence on the oil as the only mode of energy production in America even though the world’s research community had by then identified oil as the agent that was causing temperature and climate anomalies around the globe.

Evidence for this begin when senior President Bush threaten to boycott the Rio summit until he was ensured that the text of the agreements did not contain binding targets for CO2 emissions reductions. (See Earth Summit 2002, A Factfile, What the Summit hopes/hoped for, page 2). His son George W. went so far as to refuse to attend Johannesburg and blocked the Kyoto protocol wherever he could, committing the United States to a terminal course of an exclusively oil economy. (See Sources of influence in climate change policymaking: A comparative analysis of Norway, Germany, and the United States, by: Guri Bang, paragraph [225]).

Had the United States embraced Rio and Kyoto and Johannesburg they would have put themselves on a course that discouraged its suburban lifestyle that required phenomenal oil resources for its maintenance. It would have simultaneously created the sense of urgency necessary to propel them to discover an alternative to oil that would permit them a competitive edge for the successive generations. Instead they permitted their people to be lulled into complacency and a belief that they would always have plenty of oil. This of course buoyed up the position of the oil companies to the demise of the American people.

Because of this situation, the current Bush administration had no choice but to engage in preemptive wars of aggression in order to occupy territories strategic to the flow of oil in order that he could exonerate his father and his father's mentor and confidant Ronald Reagan.

I should mention that when you go to the Screen Actor's Guild's headquarters in Los Angeles, you'll notice Ronald Reagan's picture missing from the walls of the James Cagney events room even though he served two terms as the guilds president. His position on unions is the reason his picture is missing to this day.

Please, Alternet, extend you maximum word length to 80 characters!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight Turn to Delusion Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: ight Turn to Delusion Posted by: Paul Lookman
» RE: ight Turn to Delusion Posted by: bob t
» RE: ight Turn to Delusion Posted by: Paul Lookman
Who's the Worst ??
Posted by: Tahlavi on Apr 27, 2007 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've often wondered, and debated with my friends, who is really the worst president? cetainly bush2's crimes are horrific, and can't be overlooked. But I said at the time,, and still believe, raygun was the worst Everything he did set the stage for georgie-boy, america's only retarded king. let's just call it even. they don't (or haven't yet) come any worse than these two

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who's the Worst ?? Posted by: eosrk
» RE: Who's the Worst ?? Posted by: dangerouslysane
USA, now a third tier country
Posted by: eosrk on Apr 27, 2007 3:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but only 20 years ago, it was no.1. That's what happens when you screw the working man to please the CEO's of the world; now, we're a bottom country, with only an ever-dwindling military lead as well, as the rest of the real world moved on.

The usa already been defeated. How, you may say, by it's own greed. As American companies were busy sending our jobs and careers overseas, they have responded by accepting the greedyman's offers to set up shop in their country, re-engineer their money(oh, by the way, is why now the dollar is worth now only 81 cents, and dropping), banding together (euro) to propel their own industry.

That's how you take out a bully; go for it's weakest point, in this case, the greed of the beast is also its weakest point, and though the DOW is up to where it is, not becasue of US consumers, but of overseas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: USA, now a third tier country Posted by: dangerouslysane
» RE: USA, now a third tier country Posted by: richholland
» RE: USA, now a third tier country Posted by: dangerouslysane
Reagan the Mad Cow President
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Apr 27, 2007 5:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we learned in the end was his brain was out to lunch for most of his Presidency. That empty smile and jerky walk were early signs of his brain fading into Alzheimers. His ending as a drooling incontent fool was well earned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Couple of points
Posted by: jonnyk on Apr 28, 2007 2:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never heard the term 'west Europe' before. There's a loose geographical area known as western Europe and I assume that's what you're referring to. This is important for a number of reasons. First, Europe is nowhere near unified enough for people to refer to an east, west, north or south part of it. You should know this if you want to commentate on political matters--you're undermined otherwise. Secondly, 'western Europe' refers pretty clearly to certain member states (countries), with similar values and economic circumstances. 'West Europe' could feasibly refer to Estonia or Latvia, for example. I don't think these are countries you meant to refer to.

Also, this sentence confused me:

Even barring any military conflict with China, which is highly unlikely,

So is conflict likely or unlikely? Are you saying that 'barring' conflict is unlikely, or that conflict is unlikely?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Couple of points Posted by: richholland
Yes, the 1980s and Reagan reversed history back toward Empire.
Posted by: amacd on Apr 28, 2007 6:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kurt Vonnegut died last week, and so like an adoring sweet-tooth of ideas I peaked and pecked into his last book, “A Man without a Country” to see if his last ideas were the same sweet treats of his dozen earlier books that I had loved.

“Many years ago I was so innocent I still considered it possible that we could become the humane and reasonable America so many members of my generation used to dream of. We dreamed of such an America during the Great Depression, when there were no jobs. And then we fought and often died for that dream during the second world war, when there was no peace.

But I know now that there is not a chance in hell of America becoming humane and reasonable. Because power corrupts us, and absolute power corrupts us absolutely. Human beings are chimpanzees who get crazy drunk on power. By saying that our leaders are power-drunk chimpanzees, am I in danger of wrecking the morale of our soldiers fighting and dying in the Middle East? Their morale, like so many lifeless bodies, is already shot to pieces. They are being treated, as I never was, like toys a rich kid got for Christmas.”

The history of the world over the last few thousand years, since Christ, has been a slow, jerky, but none the less perceptible progression slightly away from Empire.

This ebb and flow of history seemed to peak somewhere in the 1960 to 70's with a bit of a hopeful blip.

In fact, Francis Fukuyama rather proudly claimed in 1992 the triumphant "End of History" with the escalation of democratic capitalism, free-market democracy, or whatever the hell he was then smoking. But Fukuyama took his eye off the ball (or actually the club) of elite financial capitalism's real and guileful goal ---- which was already beyond us "where the dark fields of the republic rolled on under the night".

And so it goes. The guileful global corporate Empire has now reversed any progress that history may have made, and we are now all “like toys a rich kid got for Christmas” in this "Vichy America" set-up as a facade controlled by the heartless global corporate Empire.

“Human beings have had to guess about almost everything for the past million years or so. The leading characters in our history books have been our most enthralling, and sometimes our most terrifying, guessers.

But the guessers, in fact, knew no more than the common people and sometimes less, even when, or especially when, they gave us the illusion that we were in control of our destinies.

Some of the loudest, most proudly ignorant guessing in the world is going on in Washington today. Our leaders are sick of all the solid information that has been dumped on humanity by research and scholarship and investigative reporting. It isn’t the gold standard that they want to put us back on. They want something even more basic. They want to put us back on the snake-oil standard.”

So after two millennia of slight progress against Empire and a real spurt of progress after WWII into the 1970’s, it is beyond irony that the very analogy and allusion (really illusion) that the Reagan ruling elite had settled upon in the 1980s as their last argument to keep the poor poor, and to justify the investment stream which, they argued, can only flow from a high degree of global and US inequality; that a ‘rising tide will lift all boats’, is now so precisely and ineluctably the harsh and contradicting reality that, in the 21st century, is ushering in the real rising tides of global warming that will sink the elite’s last justification of their sanctimonious economic elite Empire --- and expose the whole idea of ‘growth’ as cancerous metastasis through negative externality dumping.

When this last illusion of ‘growth’ requiring elite capital concentration is gone then all justification of economic inequality is gone too

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mommy64
Posted by: mommy64 on Apr 29, 2007 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hal Lindsay:religion/oil

1980 Republic Platform
*Carlucci
*Rove
*Segretti

Petroleum:Prayer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mommy64 Posted by: mommy64
» RE: mommy64 Posted by: bob t
PLUTOCRATS NIX IMPEACHMENT
Posted by: shangrilalad on Apr 29, 2007 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As history demonstrates, republican voters have an uncanny knack for electing wannabe dictators as president. Nixon, Reagan and Bush Jr. all fall into this category.

After six years of war profiteering and stolen elections, Democrats have another opportunity to reveal the GOP's tyrannical nature. Instead of ignoring another wannabe dictator's crimes, let's hope that this time they IMPEACH to reveal and educate the people about the true nature of the Republican party.

Pelosi and Reid say impeachment is off the table because it will hinder their prospects to win the presidency in 2008. Don't believe it, they are simply following orders. No matter which party we "elect" to govern our country, they are not in any sense our rulers. Our actual rulers are the people and corporations that own the Military Industrial Complex, and they don’t want Bush impeached. Bush is not only one of them, he has greatly increased their fortunes.

Just like Republicans, but to a lesser degree, Democrats are subservient to our plutocratic dictators, but at least they throw us a bone now and then.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National Poetry Month
Posted by: mommy64 on Apr 29, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tribute to Amos Elon
"The Pity of It All"

Gone
In '14 they deferred, Einstein and Freud.
"Rampant deceit," "Armageddon," were terms
they chose, depicting trench filling elite,
though it was the financial cost of war they feared.
Clever were advanced fortifications,
with barbed wire, from sea to Switzerland.
Nine million servicemen's lives were spent
on ground, beneath the sea, and in the air,
programming systems for the Second World War,
trauma invoked fascist nationalism.
Then, sixty million new lives were spent.
What was sharpened? Renewed enthusiasm.
In '14 they deferred, Einstein and Freud.
Bagdad. "Armageddon" "Rampant deceit."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: National Poetry Month Posted by: yellow
» RE: National Poetry Month Posted by: mommy64
America Since 1980: A Right Turn Leading to a Dead End
Posted by: fay on May 10, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
nikki blond - sex pictures black blonde blonde redhead jeune blonde woman lingerie - of sexy lingerie erotic lingerie lingerie sexy united kingdom pictures of dwarfs - porn movies midgets privacy policy midget midget redhead freckles - busty mature porn movies getting fucked to other sites nikki blond - sex pictures black blonde blonde redhead jeune blonde skinhead - the internet more tracked privacy policy tracked from animals cumshot - more tracked from sex with animals click here to animal sex with human download shemale movies - hardcore action sex stories carolina escorts mature women blanco y negro - black booty hardcore porn black and white these movies drunk chicks - privacy policy college girl girls flashing submitted by dirty schoolgirls - naughty schoolgirls movie clips schoolgirl uniforms schoolgirls sex kelly brook - fake celebs pamela anderson jennifer lopez jessica alba japanese photo - through the privacy policy the following japanese hot porn star - to personal a porn star porn videos add to personal GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED kelly brook - fake celebs pamela anderson jennifer lopez jessica alba

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America Since 1980: A Right Turn Leading to a Dead End
Posted by: hesse on May 12, 2007 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America Since 1980: A Right Turn Leading to a Dead Endshiting - angelina jolie scat movies shitting in girls shitting video teen chat - free hardcore porn free mature cartoon porn porn video free anal fucking - mature women movie clips anal fissure amateur anal female domination gallery - gangbang rape domination and extreme bondage forced feminization animal sex forum - bestiality girls bestiality free animal dick animal sex stories animal sex forum - bestiality girls bestiality free animal dick animal sex stories GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED teenage pregnancy - to personal links while pregnant add to personal the pregnant big dick gallery - big dick black cocks large penis gets fucked

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]