comments_image -

Supreme Court gives gift to predatory lenders

Nathan Newman: State banking laws have just been thrown out the window.
April 19, 2007  |  
 
Advertisement
 

From Nathan Newman at TPM Cafe

In a blow to consumers, the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that mortgage lending subsidiaries of national banks are exempt from state regulation. Every state attorney general and bank regulator had urged the High Court to protect these state laws, especially in light of federal inaction in the face of abuse by predatory lenders.

But the Court in its Watters v. Wachovia decision, upheld the power of the Bush Office of the Comptroller (OCC) to pass regulations shutting down such state laws. Those federal decisions, as Progressive States discussed a few weeks ago, directly fed the predatory lending mortgage bubble and helped encourage the abuses that may lead to 2.2 million subprime borrowers facing foreclosure on their home loans.

Justice Stevens, in his dissent to the decision, blasted his fellow Court members for endorsing those executive decisions, since no new Congressional action had given the OCC guidance to undermine these state laws:

Never before have we endorsed administrative action whose sole purpose was to pre-empt state law rather than to implement a statutory command.
Stevens point was that while the federal government might have the power to preempt state laws, it should only do so when Congress has clearly authorized such preemption or where the exercise of existing federal laws leave "no room for additional state regulation." Clearly, given federal inaction, there was plenty of room for state regulation in this situation, so the Court's decision is a radical expansion of executive power to undermine state power at the whim of a federal regulator.

Congressman Barney Frank, who chairs the House Banking Commitee, expressed similar outrage at the court decision: "We have to act on this ...The controller has eliminated a whole bunch of state consumer laws with nothing to put in their place."

Hopefully, instead of just passing a few additional federal consumer protections, Congress will also restore state power to add its own protections as well.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: banking, predatory lending
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]