Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Celebrity Colonialism: Buying Africa is the Latest Trend Among the Famous

By Adam Elkus, ColorLines. Posted May 2, 2007.


Are the efforts of well-meaning celebrities to alleviate Africa's poverty and disease the continent's salvation or a recipe for disaster?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Almost All U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison For Non-Homicide Crimes Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Adam Elkus

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Celebrities have always identified with underdogs. Playing a victim or otherwise disadvantaged character is a sure route to an Oscar, and everyone from Bruce Springsteen to Eminem has celebrated the underdog in song.

It's not surprising that models, actors, and popular musicians have focused on impoverished Africa, raising money and awareness for debt relief and famine. However, these efforts have done relatively little to address the structural causes of African misery. There is also an uncomfortable element of colonialism that runs through celebrities' interactions with Africans and current interest in African culture.

Is the celebrity fascination with Africa genuine or shallow? Are the efforts of well-meaning celebrities to alleviate Africa's poverty and disease the continent's salvation or a recipe for disaster?

The recent spate of celebrity adoptions, Angelina Jolie's much-hyped birth in Namibia, and Kate Moss's infamous blackface modeling in the Independent reveal cultural colonialism masquerading as liberal multiculturalism. And despite their good intentions, Bob Geldof and Bono are being led around by the nose by technocrats and multinational corporations who bear responsibility for much of Africa's problems.

Madonna's "adoption" of a Malawian baby epitomizes the worst of the celebrity adoption trend. Malawi's stringent adoption laws force foreigners to stay 18 months in the country to be assessed as prospective parents. After concerted lobbying, a Malawian court issued an interim order allowing Madonna to take the child out of the country for a year, triggering court challenges from human rights groups and charities who felt Madonna had "bought" the ruling through her extravagant patronage of Malawian orphanages.

Unwilling to wait, the pop singer deployed a team to spirit the child back to England. Madonna follows a celebrity trend started by Angelina Jolie, who adopted children from Cambodia and Ethiopia. A naysayer might point out that the babies will lead better lives in the West. However, growing up in an alien culture separated from one's own ethnic traditions is a recipe for psychological problems. It has disturbing echoes of the Spanish, American, and Australian colonial practice of kidnapping aboriginal children in order to raise them with white Christian values; such kidnappings were justified by a similar desire to rescue the children from what was perceived as a poverty both literal and spiritual.

These issues are compounded by the objectification of celebrity adoptees by the media, which publicize them as exotic objects rather than human beings. There is no doubt that Jolie and Madonna love their children, but they inevitably become exotic props and grist for the likes of Us Weekly.

The most troubling aspect of the celebrity adoptions concerns Western privilege, with Madonna and Angelina Jolie swooping into impoverished countries to essentially buy babies from families too poor to care for them. In Madonna's case, she technically abducted the baby, as her men took the child before a Malawian court could rule against her.

But the most grotesque manifestation of colonial privilege occurred when Jolie turned a small corner of Namibia into an armed camp so she could give birth unmolested. Brendan O'Neill in the online magazine spiked put it this way:

Over the past six weeks a Western security force has effectively taken over the small African nation of Namibia. A beach resort in Langstrand in Western Namibia has been sealed off with security cordons, and armed security personnel have been keeping both local residents and visiting foreigners at bay. A no-fly zone has been enforced over part of the country. The Westerners have also demanded that the Namibian government severely restrict the movement of journalists into and out of Namibia. The government agreed and, in a move described by one human rights organization as 'heavy-handed and brutal', banned certain reporters from crossing its borders.
Jolie essentially dictated security measures to a sovereign country, taking advantage of its poverty in order to have a "special" experience giving birth in Africa. She decided who entered and left the country and carved out an exclusive space where she commanded a small army of private security officers.

This favoritism is reminiscent of the behavior of colonial elites catalogued in Albert Memmi's classic text The Colonizer and the Colonized:
If he is in trouble with the law, the police and even justice will be more lenient toward him. If he needs assistance from the government, it will not be difficult; red tape will be cut; a window will be reserved for him .. From the time of his birth, he possesses a qualification independent of his personal merits or his actual class. He is part of the group of colonizers whose values are sovereign.
When one views the now-familiar scene of a Western movie star and a television crew arriving to a god's welcome in a dusty African village, one cannot help but be reminded of the film The Man Who Would Be King, in which two British soldiers on the run are mistaken by Afghani villagers to be actual deities.

Madonna and Angelina Jolie may have great respect for the orphans they advocate for, but their special treatment warps the power dynamics of the countries they visit. It is symbolic of a larger problem: Jolie is not the only Westerner with a private army allowed to operate as a sovereign force on foreign soil -- oil and diamond companies maintain unaccountable private security forces in many impoverished regions.

While Jolie's and Madonna's celebrity colonialism takes a physical form, Kate Moss's hits on a deeper level. In a high-tech update of the blackface vaudeville entertainers, Moss was digitally altered to look like a Black woman for a special Independent issue on women in Africa. This is symbolic of the trendy celebrities' trendy Africanism.

Moss can claim solidarity with African women and appropriate their identity via Photoshop, but at the end of the day she also can return to a safe home and a lucrative modeling career. Needless to say, the suffering women she mimics cannot.

The devout Christian Bono is in many ways a modern version of the starry-eyed missionaries that went to Africa to save souls alongside the imperialists who strived for riches. Unlike his forbearers, Bono is not out to spread the cross, but its modern equivalent, liberal capitalism.

He preaches from the stage about saving Africa's suffering masses while promoting economist Jeffrey Sachs, whose neoliberal "austerity" measures helped wreck the economies of Bolivia, Poland, and Russia. As a consultant, Sachs mechanically applied orthodox free-market theories to radically restructure underdeveloped countries, exacerbating already formidable problems. This is the remedy Bono intends for Africa.

The thread that links all of these cases is that Africa is being used as a blank space on which these celebrities can project their own fantasies of "saving" Africans. For celebrities like Bob Geldof and Bono, Africa is also a vehicle for a grand moral struggle.

As Brandon 'O Neill of spiked writes:
This brand of moral grandstanding suggests that Africa has become a kind of plaything for some campaigners, a backdrop against which they can make themselves feel good and 'special'. They are searching for personal meaning and purpose in the deserts and grasslands of Africa, not kickstarting a meaningful debate about how to take Africa forward
There is little new about this. The 19th century missionaries and explorers who established European control over the continent saw it as an exotic and forbidding land in which a similar kind of personal meaning could be found (or lost). The actual thoughts and desires of the inhabitants mattered little.

Celebrities see Africa in a similar way. Jolie, Madonna, and Moss have convinced themselves that they have some kind of connection to the suffering African masses, despite their immense wealth and fame, and they search for public ways of proving that connection. They confuse this wish-fulfillment and festishization of the exotic for meaningful measures that are actually helping Africans.

Similarly, Bono and Geldof may think they are reducing human misery, when they are really just preaching the gospel of free-market wealth to suffering Africans. That's the most obscene part about the celebrity crusade for Africa: Jolie's and Madonna's antics take public attention off the continent's real problems, and do-gooders like Bono and Geldof give rhetorical cover to those who bear responsibility for a substantial portion of those problems.

When it comes down to it, colonialism is still colonialism, even if it poses in a fashion magazine, plays a Tomb Raider in the multiplex, or strums a guitar. One cannot ascribe malicious motives to the celebrities -- they sincerely believe they are making a positive difference. But they are not.

While celebrities "find themselves" in Africa's plains, the IMF, World Bank, and multinational corporations continue their profiteering unchallenged by these neo-missionaries. If celebrities really want to help Africa, perhaps they can start closer to home-by taking the difficult and unpopular step of lobbying their own governments and financial institutions to stop making Africa's pain worse.

This will not win them any friends in the government, nor is it glamorous. It does not involve traveling to far-flung locations, staging star-studded rock concerts, or building village hospitals in front of TV cameras. Talking to a largely apathetic public about arms control treaties, neoliberal "shock therapy" economics, corporate subsidies, resource exploitation, generic AIDs drugs, and other serious issues is difficult even for politicians and newsmen. But celebrities have the potential to do what politicians cannot -- spreading awareness among a political constituency that will hold Western governments to task for their actions in Africa.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: africa, madonna, adoption, kate moss, bono, angelina jolie

Adam Elkus lives in Pacific Palisades, California. He can be reached at: adam@clearstone.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Piecemeal Celebrity Narcissism....
Posted by: CatDad on May 2, 2007 12:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...won't alleviate the plight of peoples who have had their native lands ravaged by predatory world superpowers which carved up their lands, extracted their resources and then left all sorts of major problems behind for poor indigenous people to cope with. Yet, it makes us feel better when Oprah opens up an academy for about 200 young girls in South Africa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neocolonialism is strengthening
Posted by: zyxwvut on May 2, 2007 1:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, much of this Africa fuss in the Western media is about allaying the consciences of populations in the metropole. There is also new interest in Africa that is non-psychic in nature: tension between the United States and China, the latter as a rising superpower. China and the U.S. are now competing to an extreme degree for resources in Africa, particularly oil. The benevolent celebrity face of American involvement in the African continent over the past several years is indeed comparable to the benevolent missionary face of European involvement a century ago. Like the missionaries of old (who are still around, and almost as hypocritical, but not as well publicized), celebrities give American involvement in Africa a charitable veneer, providing the American public with a distraction away from other, darker forms of American involvement on the continent.

Also, celebrities get to feel good about themselves for being such wonderful people and helping those suffering Africans. They get to play the classic role of the "white person in Africa," who is lionized and regarded with awe. Some celebrities, like Madonna and Bono, might not have been getting this kind of attention in the West since the height of their original popularity in the 1980s, so adopting Africa as a cause might have enabled them to regain their place in the limelight.

Celebrities will not save Africa. Foreign involvement of any kind will not save Africa, and to believe so is to fall into the colonial mindset that treats Africans like children who need to be rescued because they cannot rescue themselves.

The West, and perhaps China now, need to get out of Africa and let African nations develop on their own in local and regional contexts. Strong economies develop from the inside-out, from the local level to the national. They do not begin by serving the interests of far-flung economic powers. Further globalization may well wreak a havoc beyond anything Africa has experienced so far.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Also, humanitarian causes help entertainers to feel like they are more than entertainers.
Posted by: zyxwvut on May 2, 2007 2:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who would have thought Kate Moss has such an important historical role to play?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The celebrity dilemma
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 2, 2007 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it realistic to think speaking out against the structural/political causes of poverty will make a difference? Many celebrities, do-gooders and others have come and gone for hundreds of years, yet we still have poverty amongst plenty.

And if they do address the evils head-on, will they be ridiculed as Hollywood know-it-alls who don't know what they're talking about? Or for using their fame as a soap box?

Put yourself in the $5000 shoes of these celebrities. Do you try to do what you can, given the resources you have, in an imperfect world where people are hungry today? Or do you get deep into the politics, knowing you could easily get in over your head, be doing more harm than good, or be wasting your time?

It's easy to say it's about egos and self-indulgence. And I'm sure it is for all of them to a certain extent. But realistically, what would you do if you were them?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Attention Rich People! New Trend!
Posted by: terradea on May 2, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Own your very own American down-and-out baby boomer! That's right ... be the first on your block to show your good taste by rescuing an over-educated, under-employed, debt-riddled 40-something with a lot of American potential. All it takes is about $200K, and you'll be on your way to cultivating true, latent talent. You'll walk in the footsteps of royalty (Who knows? Your boomer could be the next Shakespeare or Michelangelo!). Do some good, invest in American inspiration. In return, you'll get an endless supply of personalized artistic effort, the opportunity to develop a real American craftswoman (uhm ... not a Paris Hilton), and a chance to gain the the honor of being the one who "discovered" this innate genius. Hurry, limited time offer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Attention Rich People! New Trend! Posted by: acidicjazzhead
» RE: Attention Rich People! New Trend! Posted by: acidicjazzhead
How come you never see any Black celebrities
Posted by: bradford on May 2, 2007 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
helping out starving Africans? They can piss away untold fortures on "bling," but they never lift a finger and adopt an African baby - it's only Whites doing this. Oprah? Jamie Fox? P. Doofy? Diana Ross?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Audrey Hepburn
Posted by: zooeyhall on May 2, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go to Wikipedia and check out the life and works of Audrey Hepburn. An outstanding oscar-winning actress who spent the last years of her life working for UNICEF.

Unlike the pampered over-grown brats like Madonna, etc., she knew poverty and oppression first-hand. She almost starved to death during the Nazi occupation of her native Holland. She witnessed the deportation of jews, and witnessed family members executed in the street by the Gestapo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, grow up
Posted by: janvdb on May 2, 2007 8:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, I hate Angelina Jolie for her excessively-female, adopt-adopt-adopt, pregnant-pregnant-pregnant blah-blah-blah but COLONIALISM?

Grow up.

It's OK for every black man in the NFL to waste millions on bling and worthless junk like long, low black cars with gold-plated wheel rims and diamonds in his teeth, etc but when Bono campaigns for debt relief that's COLONIALISM?

You're just jealous that you're not a celebrity yourself.

Your ideological view of global poverty is 30 years out of date -- and already proven wrong by reality.

Look at the economic history of Ghana. Colonialism was benign compared to the effects of over-intervention by the state under Nkuomo.

Bono's campaign has actually done some real good; there was a recent traunch of debt-forgiveness and I hope he keeps at it. Debt IS part of the structural problems which plague Africa. We lend to their criminal elites; the criminal elites waste the money; the populations are taxed to pay us back.

We have to stop giving anything to the thugs who have grabbed control of many of these states through guns, violence and war. Private charitible activity there to directly provide public health, etc is the way to go.

I'd like to point out that one of the most destructive of the structural problems which plague Africa is this absurd blaming of "colonialism" for all their problems and the use of this in a sick stew to create the "African Socialism" which was the main cause of the continent's failure to thrive for the past 50 years.

I'll agree any day that French policies in that bit of Francophone Africa they still control are out-and-out colonialism at its worst (in particular, their set-in-France monetary policies, overvalued currencies and government-set cocoa prices), but that accounts for only a small bit of Africa -- the Ivory Coast and a few neighbors.

The vast majority of Africa has been devastated for 50 years by Africans themselves, doing totally African things like waging war, terrorizing peasants, misappropriating aid money, nationalizing industries, setting agricultural prices and so on.

Is the writer trying to get us to believe that he understands the root causes of protracted African poverty better than Jeffrey Sachs? HA!! The author's attitude is part of what has killed progress in Africa for the past 50 years.

Jeffrey Sachs did get Russia wrong, but he has been mostly right otherwise. And the only reason he even IS a celebrity is his anti-poverty work, so how can he be tossed into the same vat of tar as the likes of Angelina Jolie?

"African socialism," state-controlled industries, centrally-set prices, corruption, violence, constant war, poor public health, the birthing of more children than can be fed, educated and employed, bureaucratic theft, the venality of African elites -- this is what is keeping Africa poor.

Blaming "colonialism" is just SOOOOOO ridiculous at this point. Get your facts straight! China was colonized, too, as was India, HongKong and so on, but that hasn't left them sitting in their own cesspool the way it has Africa.

Leave off the "colonialism" PC crap and take a look at the reality of what is going on in this world, buddy.

The Africans are figuring it out and getting it right. Look at Ghana, recently. You need to catch up with them.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh, grow up Posted by: zyxwvut
» It's amazing... Posted by: vangogh69
It is total intellectual laziness to lump Bono and Sachs with Jolie
Posted by: janvdb on May 2, 2007 8:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Think about what you are saying a little more.

Angelina Jolie is a strange person, somehow kind of broken and nutty. Yes, I feel sorry for her kids, too, but that doesn't mean that all adoptions from all poor countries are suspect.

It's just Angelina. Yeah, she's creepy. So, go write about that in some tabloid.

If you are going to attack Bono and Sachs, you are going to need intellectual chops you, I can see, currently lack.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Janvp
Posted by: peekay on May 2, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't agree more. And by the looks of your name, you are probably one who has actually experienced Africa more than this author who may as well write for Hello, People, Voice, etc...

Thanks for telling it like it is. Africans are the most responsible for their current situation, not only the 'West'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Profit and guilt
Posted by: wildbill on May 2, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From "The Constant Gardener" - "Free medicines, Mr. Black. Most of them well beyond their sell-by date. The drug companies donate them. It's a tax break for them. Disposable drugs for disposable patients. Out here they have absolutely no shelf life. Safest thing to do is incinerate them.
Big pharmaceuticals are right up there with the arms dealers. This is how the world fucks Africa, Mr. Black. Blood on their hands? It's how they expiate their guilt. Pharmaceuticals, the aid agencies, everybody. This whole machine is driven by guilt."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not write about the real issues devastating Africa?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 2, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) Oil wars for the benefit of Shell, Exxon, Chevron, and friends - this includes Somalia, Nigeria, Niger, Chad and Sudan - behind every major conflict you read about in the press is a struggle by Western oil companies to control African natural resources - there's also cobalt and diamonds, but oil is the big one.

2) Pharmaceutical intellectual property rights agreements that prevent desperately needed medicines from reaching African people, as well as the pharma companies use of African populations as guinea pigs for drug trials.

3) The IMF/World Bank loansharking operations that bankrupt African economies and prevent them from building the needed infrastructure that will lift them out of poverty.

On a more positive note, Africa is the perfect continent for renewable energy systems - they don't need as much infrastructure (solar panels and a battery, instead of coal-fired power plants and electicity transmission networks) and they have the most sunlight.

A quick note to the author: Blaming Africa's problems on Madonna and Jolie is just ridiculous - who cares whether they adopt orphans or not? the AIDS crisis has created huge numbers of parentless children on that continent - and if someone wants to help alleviate the situation by adopting them and giving them a good life, that's great - I bet the kid who is being adopted is pretty damn happy about it - why don't you try life in an African orphanage for a while before wasting your time on issues like this one? Have you seen the Constant Gardener?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brendan O'Neill quotes are appreciated
Posted by: Torgo on May 2, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks to the author for quoting Brendan O'Neill. He's one of my favorite writers, and he delights in exposing the bizarre subjective psychological motives of leftist activists who have troubles with guilt (for whatever reason) and a yawning gap in their lives to be filled with "meaning" or something. He's particularly strong when discussing Darfur and Yugoslavia.

Darfur: damned by pity

What Milosevic meant to them

Why are those, like George Clooney, who opposed Bush's war in Iraq now calling on the president to 'Save Darfur'?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They may not be celebrities . . .
Posted by: MAD on May 2, 2007 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But you should see 'em flocking to China where babies, like everything else in China, are a real bargain. From my last trip to Shenzhen and Guangzhou, it was apparent that the baby rush was on. It was said by locals that China was so attractive as an adoption destination ONLY because "parents" could save thousands if not tens-of-thousands for their own pret a porter toddler.

I was truly frightened for the children as the qualification criteria was obviously none too rigid. You should have seen the Euro-trash passing themselves off as parents. I saw one woman blowing cigarette smoke directly into the stroller while another let his daugther drop from the hotel desk while he tried to sign the bill. The stroller was literally 5 feet away but apparently putting baby on the counter was what immediately came to mind. I asked the hotel staff to have the guy checked out because something smelled fishy. Anyway, god help these children - they either end up spoiled to death but left alone while mom's on set or suffer with some pedophile or abusive asshole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Quickly...
Posted by: vangogh69 on May 2, 2007 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not sure Madonna or Jolie are doing much to alleviate Africa's problems, and frankly, its a bit suspicious that they have to go across the Atlantic when both California (where Jolie is from?) and Michigan (where Madonna is from) have many, many children needing to be adopted. But perhaps there's no glamour in that?

Madonna and Jolie are the soft-side of imperialism and its only due to their nation (US) position as the world's superpower that they're able to amass the wealth that they have, a relative benefit from being a part of the Empire. They're like the missionaries spreading Catholicism or Protestanism in South America 200 years ago: sure they mean well, but they fail to see the bigger picture. Perhaps they should read a book?

Africa has lots of problems, but hell, its been raped and beaten for almost five hundred years. Funny how so many are quick to say, "Wow, why can't they get it together" when the comforts they enjoy today are the fruit of exploitation and violation of the past. If Jolie or M really wanna help Africa, they could start by speaking out against Shell in Nigeria which, among other things, is helping to ensure global warming beyond repair (hell, that's three goals in one: helping Africa, ecological preservation, AND self-aggrandizement!).

You'd think the US is free of problems the way these celebrities trot off around the world and wanna "save" other people. Um, let's get our own house in order before we fix our neighbor's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Quickly... Posted by: xconservative
Not sure what to think of Angelina's escapades...
Posted by: mjabele on May 2, 2007 7:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...other than I'm surprised and disappointed to hear that the Namibian government caved in so readily to her outrageous requests. Did Tom and Katie make similar demands of the Italian government for their gala wedding last year, and if so, did the Italians likewise accede to them?

That being said, I suspect she's motivated by the desire to do some good. Arguably, it's probably difficult for her to do so without being accused of self-promotion, given the degree to which the press follows her every move already. The argument that she might work more quietly behind the scenes, like Audrey Hepburn did during her later years, doesn't strike me as quite fair, since Hepburn did most of her work well after she'd already retired from film-making and withdrawn from the public eye.

Having volunteered in Africa myself for a time, I would agree only partly with the many comments suggesting that Westerners who work overseas are motivated either by guilt or "egomania" - I really haven't seen too many examples of the former, and as for the latter, many if not most of the egomaniacs tend to get disappointed by reality, so to speak, and leave early. Unfortunately, the few who manage to stay on can sometimes wreak a fair amount of havoc, especially if their egomania succeeds in landing them a management position.

As for whether the West or Africans themselves are responsible for the continent's myriad problems, it seems to me a bit of both. Corruption, tribalism, lack of knowledge and education, the low status of women virtually everywhere - all these strike me as indigenous (albeit not exclusively "African") problems, and Africans need - and indeed are starting, I think - to take on some responsibility for struggling with these issues. At the same time, I honestly don't believe the West's essentially exploitative and paternalistic attitude toward Africa has fundamentally changed all that much since independence. Civil wars in countries such as Angola, Sierra Leone, and DRC were fueled to a significant extent by the West's interest in mineral/petroleum resources, and none of these conflicts ever received half as much attention in the Western media as those in places such as the Balkans or the Middle East. And many of the West's efforts to "help" Africans - including Mr. Bush's woefully misconceived "abstinence" plan to curb the spread of HIV - seem to have been formulated with absolutely no knowledge of actual conditions there.

I can certainly agree with much of the dismal portrait Paul Theroux paints in "Dark Star Safari" of the negative effects of some forms of Western aid, which often seem to reinforce corruption and perpetuate dependency rather than actually helping Africans, but I don't think all forms of aid necessarily end up doing this, and would argue for more creativity and humility on the part of Western governments and donors. By humility, I mean listening - listening more to what Africans say they need, rather than what we think they need; more responsibility - letting Africans manage things whenever possible, rather than expatriates; and more accountability - which may mean withdrawing aid or terminating projects when problems like corruption or incompetence become intractable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In Search Of...Blk Princess Diana (Afrikan Adoptions)
Posted by: Malcus Garvey on May 4, 2007 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN SEARCH OF…
THE NEO, BLACK PRINCESS DIANA

April 26, 2007


I’m getting real tired of always seeing a white female in Afrika, doing humanitarian and rescue services there, ‘saving’ the souls of our Black children through gift-giving and adoptive measures. These acts of Godly, good-will were implemented into our minds and hearts, as far back as I can remember, through non other than Blessed Mother Teresa:

(“It’s a poverty to decide that a child must die [abortions] so that you may live as you wish.”).

Mother Theresa seemed to have obviously passed the torch of redemptive love by the Greco-Roman, European-Jewish community to the likes of the Dorothy Dandridge and the slain Princess Di of Wales. This is what had people—the world over—shedding tears over the death of any one female I have ever seen. I can only attribute her efforts to witnessing firsthand, the abominable acts of the British (whites) in a number of Pigmented countries, but on the soil of the Afrikan continent in particular.
(This is why I have to ask for the “neo Black Princess Di,” since D. Dandridge has previously filled the bill. She adopted children the world over.)
The likes of Angelina Jolie and Madonna, both now serving as ambassadors on the same continent and others, are adopting children of all nationalities. Thee Lord says ‘blessed are those who love and care for children.’ Looking about, I thought we had two possible A-A female candidates to modernly be publicized showing good will and adopting, at least one child from their Native Homeland. This Godly act has yet to manifest; nor have my candidates panned out.
My first thought was of the Secretary of State Condolezza Rice, due to her educational background and position of popularity, like the other non-Black, torch bearers. Then I came to realize her age has eliminated her, along with her willingness to stand beside the warmongers of the United States; sacrificing children for the sake of a manmade ‘patriotism.’
The next potential candidate, and one who still has a chance to represent the A-A race and females as an adoptive diplomat in Afrika, is Halle Berry. Although she’s only known for sultry movie earnings, she has openly violated the TENTH COMMANDMENT (“Thou shalt not covet anything that is of another race’s…”—the white females’ man), while the rumor mill has it that Condi suffers from the same slavery-fever bug.
I almost forgot, former Secretary of Defense William C. Cohen’s wife, Janet Leola Floyd-Langhart Cohen would have made a good candidate too, yet I think she has two strikes against her. One being her fetish for repeatedly violating the 10th COMMANDMENT (marrying multiple white men), two, being her refusal to put the world’s suffering children, before her personal gratification, material wealth and Kimetic misandry skills.
(Out of respect to Princess Di & Dodi Fayad—the Black Prince she was pregnant by—all Black women should boycott and hold a moratorium on dating, let alone marrying, white males, since this act of white male ‘tabooism’ which Princess Di God fully violated, got her and Dodi assassinated!)
Maybe it’s just me, but it seems that the modern day A-A female feels her ultimate birthing responsibility is acquiring a quality paying occupation and title. Children rearing and diaper changing have come to be archaic things to them. Motherhood and grandmother-hood have come to be duties of indentured servants and foreigners. Relatively, their other lifelong task seems to be misandryism, masqueraded as “feminism.”
“The greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» is it just me or... Posted by: Pris_Praxis
Comments about celebrity adoptions right on target...
Posted by: Pris_Praxis on May 6, 2007 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... because anyone can see that adopting a handful of children won't alleviate the suffering of the people in these countries - and may even worsen it in some small way (because population pressure is one way to force change). Jolie's commandeering of Namibia for her 'special' birth experience is especially atrocious.

But, the commentary about Bono/Geldof ("led around by the nose") leaves all of us at an impasse. If even the likes of these celebs working at a macro-level are subject to such critique, then that leaves all of us helpless and, utlimately, disinterested. Let's embrace the fact that all people need to feel (to borrow a term from child development studies) 'masterful' - that is, competent. Able to do something, anything.

Mr. Adam's critique pulls the rug out from under that impulse and leaves us with nothing. That's why it's easy to be the critic and hard to be the 'actor'. Those who take action are at least doing something however gray and flawed the playing field.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

is it just me or...
Posted by: Pris_Praxis on May 6, 2007 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is this post pretty incoherent, even nutty? Also pretty far-right religious fundamentalist? Ick.

In the late year of 2007 (or whatever YOUR calendar reads) proposing double-standards about parenthood repsonsibilities of mothers vs. fathers, is going to get you nowhere. NO woman of any education level is going listen to "get back to your diapers and dishes and shut up!". Last I checked, no man likes being viewed as a 'money object' either. Generally speaking, both partners/parents like being view as equally competent and equally dutiful of all life tasks.

And studies have show time and again: give education and micro-loans to women in developing countries or impoverished areas (not to men) and they will turn their lives and communities around. Only educating women limits birth rates. Micro-loans to women result in 95% of the money staying in the community, whereas less than half given to men will grant that result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Celebrity Colonialism: Buying Africa is the Latest Trend Among the Famous
Posted by: o_hare on May 10, 2007 2:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
european babes - to personal sexy bikini click here to to personal bikini cup d - cock sucking girls sucking girls sucking the hottest prego - your doctor sex stories personal links pregnant pregnant small breast photos - plastic surgeons plastic surgeons the breasts your breasts gay s&m - bondage stories bondage and bondage and hardcore gay drinking - copyright the following the following this comment gay group - groupsex movies video clips hardcore porn young group gay amateur - free pictures amateur nude nude amateur amateur porn extreme - digital cameras foot fetish double dildo hairy pussy feet fetish gallery - collection of hardcore porn foot fetish site fetish porn gays - san francisco click here to ajouter un commentaire looking for teen orgy - lesbian teen getting fucked hardcore party orgy lesbian GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED hunk military - muscle hunk posing naked posing naked email address fat babe - for example this article fatty liver porn movies tranny - these clips blonde tranny hardcore action these movies

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Celebrity Colonialism: Buying Africa is the Latest Trend Among the Famous
Posted by: zoroastrian on May 12, 2007 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Celebrity Colonialism: Buying Africa is the Latest Trend Among the Famouslarge display - copyright breast cancer sexy lingerie with big tits asian nylon - black nylon sexe amateur fetichisme pied fully fashioned latex uk - latex balloons latex allergy privacy policy latex catsuit feet fetish porn - dominatrix guide feet fetish sex stories foot fetish celebritymoviearchive - britney spears natalie portman 1px solid black nipple slips sex teacher - photo click for porno gratis videos porno porn videos GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED girls jerking off - straight men gay amateur jerking off looking for oregon cheerleaders - blonde cheerleader spring break university of community college

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Celebrity Colonialism: Buying Africa is the Latest Trend Among the Famous
Posted by: spayed on May 12, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Celebrity Colonialism: Buying Africa is the Latest Trend Among the Famousswingers mexico - swingers lifestyle adult swingers swingers clubs dating site animals mpegs - dog fucking dick in pussy animal porn horse bestiality transsexual los angeles - a transsexual washington dc any questions transexual escorts black sex toys - looking for your partner glass dildos good vibrations femdom domination - video clips femdom strapon female domination ball busting anime babes - graphic novel graphic novel anime series graphic novel GEFFEDEVS766GERTT9009ED bangkok oriental - japanese girls school girl the japanese japanese women black sex toys - looking for your partner glass dildos good vibrations

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement