Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Why Are Americans Afraid of Being Naked?

By Dara Colwell, AlterNet. Posted April 19, 2007.


In the Netherlands people can be naked in their gardens, the beach and recently the gym. But in America, even chocolate sculptures can't be without clothes. What gives?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dara Colwell

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When Catholic protesters recently shut down a New York exhibit displaying a naked, life-sized Jesus sculpted from chocolate, the outcry wasn't totally unexpected. Labeled offensive by critics, the artwork touched an angry nerve by pushing religion and nudity -- two substances that historically don't mix -- into the limelight. While the media was quick to exploit the story, it also expressed surprising modesty when it came to the naked Christ, avoiding the full frontal and opting for photos of the Lord's backside.

But in Europe, and particularly the Netherlands, where bakeries display anatomically correct marzipan nudes in their front windows right next to chocolate bunnies and chicks, such furor over confectionary draws a complete blank. On this side of the Atlantic, when it comes to nudity, Europeans happily assert they've got absolutely nothing to hide.

"The Netherlands is a liberal country where public nakedness is allowed, and that's the way it should be -- that's why there's a law for it," says Ragna Verwer of the Dutch Naturist Federation (NFN), a 70,000-member-strong organization established to expand naturist activities.

According to Verwer, 1.9 million Dutch regularly get nude, going to nude beaches or stripping down in their own gardens, though she estimates the numbers are much higher as NFN doesn't include sauna-goers in its research. "Naked recreation is well accepted here. But we have to take care that things stay this way, which is why we often discuss these matters with local city councils and recreation areas to create more places."

Legally, in Netherlands people are allowed to be naked anywhere except public roads or when they annoy others, a law in play since 1986. It is not uncommon to find nude swimming sessions at public swimming pools, nude or topless beaches. Recently, Fitworld, a gym in Heteren in the eastern Netherlands, introduced Naked Sunday, offering locals the opportunity for bare workouts. This quickly proved a popular idea -- at least with journalists, photographers and television crews, who easily outnumbered participants on the opening day.

"I've done interviews with people from Russia, Ireland, Canada, Australia, America and Turkey," says Fitworld's owner, Patrick de Man, who says Naked Sunday was in part a competitive response to other gyms offering pole dancing courses, but also a response to a request from two of his naturist clients. De Man says the amount of attention he received both from home and abroad was surprising because "being naked is absolutely normal here," though admittedly, bare bench presses were totally new to Holland. But the owner has also received complaints from locals, mostly about sanitation, and at least one member wrote on the club's website that he was switching gyms.

"A lot people from the church have sent me letters about God and stuff like that. But I tell them God was the first man of naturism. He and Adam and Eve were all naked on Earth," says de Man, taking the criticism rather pragmatically. True -- at least until the couple donned their first fig leaves, provoking centuries of subsequent debate.

"Nudity is definitely not shocking or even arousing," says Mandy Servais, a customer at Amsterdam's Sauna Deco, in a robe wrapped loosely around her body, which for all intents and purposes, was naked, as Dutch saunas are visited in the buff. Says Servais, who has frequented saunas since she was a teen, "I think as a society we're very simple and take a practical approach to sex and nudity. We think that everything that exists is normal so there's no need to make a fuss. We're not really occupied with what others think."

Verwer mirrors Servais' response. "I think the Dutch believe let everyone have their dignity and do what they enjoy most. This isn't just how we think about naked recreation, the same goes for gays --everyone's accepted," she says.

While the Dutch seem to accept that underneath their clothing everyone's naked, the same laissez-faire attitude doesn't apply in the States, where the public has been schooled in the cultural ideology that "nude is naughty," and nudity is regarded as sexual.

Perhaps much of this attitude can be chalked down to America's cultural forefathers, the Puritans, whose deeply religious moral zeal made them fear nudity so much they refused to bathe, ensuring a future of national prudishness.

This might appear a huge contradiction given the American media's rampant appetite for sex, but how else to explain the fury over Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" and the network's rush to cleanup before facing clampdowns and stiff fines? Or PBS's need to position the disclaimer "For mature audiences only" when broadcasting footage of Michelangelo's David.

A further inconsistency when it comes to nudity is what Americans regard as risqué: barely clad Victoria Secret models strutting their way across television or nude grandmothers? As Dove soap found out this March, it's the latter. The Federal Communications Commission, which regulates America's broadcast media, banned a series of prime-time ads depicting six middle-aged women posing nude for Dove Proage products, claiming it was inappropriate, though the ads ran successfully in Europe and Canada.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: nudity

Dara Colwell is a freelance writer based in Amsterdam.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I thought it was funny
Posted by: White middleclass male on Apr 19, 2007 1:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that Americans complained about children seeing Janet Jackson's nipple as they were watching 300 lbs men cream each other

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I thought it was funny Posted by: counterpoint
» RE: I thought it was funny Posted by: daytripper
These Americans are crazy...
Posted by: Catherine Martell on Apr 19, 2007 2:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Or PBS's need to position the disclaimer "For mature audiences only" when broadcasting footage of Michelangelo's David."

Good grief!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: These Americans are crazy... Posted by: counterpoint
We are animals
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Apr 19, 2007 2:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being naked removes any possibility of pretending otherwise. The prudes who repress their own sexuality and channel that sublimation into prurient disgust and horror at the sexuality of others must repress others. "I ain't descended from no monkey" they cry, "God made us in his own image 6000 years ago."

Sex is shameful and nasty. Nudity = sex - therefore nudity is shameful and nasty. 100 years ago in this country, a wife who enjoyed sex might well be suspected if infidelity. Sex is still considered shameful even within marriage in some quarters and it hasn't been that long since everything but vaginal intercourse was outright illegal. I myself was taught that sex was only for procreation and that even within marriage sex was to be restricted to exclusively procreative use.

At a high school dance I was approached by a team of penguins (nuns). The girl and I were seperated and individually told that we had been dancing too close and were in a state of mortal sin (If you die before confessing and being forgiven, do not pass go - go directly to hell.) I was astounded; yeah, I had been really turned on, but couldn't quite see how that was such a bad thing. A couple of days later, I went to confession and still incredulous, asked if the nuns had been right. The priest said they were exactly right.

"I am 14 years old," I said "Marriage is impossible for me for seven or eight years at least. Are you telling me that I'm going to hell if I do much more than hold hands for the next seven years?" (If you don't firmly and sincerely resolve not to commit the sin again - which I couldn't imagine doing - then you've made a bad confession. That's also a mortal sin.)

"Yes," he replied, "that is what I'm telling you."

I took a deep breath and broached a subject I had never discussed with any adult. "What about masturbation?"

"That's also a mortal sin," he replied.

Suddenly it all became clear to me. "You are crazy as hell," I said, then I got up (you kneel in confession) and walked out.

That was the day I stopped being Catholic and started deprogramming myself.

What does all this have to do with the subject at hand? Only a certain kind of religious fanatic believes that natural is evil and sinful. Obviously civilized behavior requires reasonable restraint of our animal nature, but the lust to regulate the harmless behavior of others is the hallmark of the religious fanatic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Speak for yourself Posted by: No.mad
» RE: Speak for yourself Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: We are animals Posted by: bornxeyed
» Ah See Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Ah See - no Posted by: UnEasyOne
» RE: Ah See - no Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: Ah See - no Posted by: djnoll
» You GO!! Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: You GO!! Posted by: jroth420
» RE: We are animals Posted by: jalde
So where can I see the naked Jesus???
Posted by: kgs1947 on Apr 19, 2007 3:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We cow-two to prudes in this country! If people...bakers, candlestick makers and so on...wouldn't collapse before the sex-negative perpetrators, we might makes some advances in this country about accepting our sexual natures. We probably would not have so many porn sites either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So where can I see the naked Jesus??? Posted by: littlemanintheboat
On the other hand...
Posted by: ro5b on Apr 19, 2007 3:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I kind of like it that nudity and eroticism are so intertwined here. I don't think I'd really like it if I didn't get turned on by the sight of a naked female body.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No freedom for you....
Posted by: digitalfrenzy on Apr 19, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad fact is that in the country of continous titilation, and selling of sex, the people in charge are sexually repressed uptight religious white people. The fact that disclaimers on PBS are shown bolster the ignorance and pettiness of a politically correct farce gone too far. America is one of the least free places I have lived, and its sad to see so many people think that the USA is the blueprint to freedom. You are all deluded. Go back to your Nascar, eat your burger, and go shopping. That is your freedom. You are free to consume...that is all. The thought process in the US is at least 5 years behind Europe, and that is your downfall. The Fall of Rome part 2 is happening, and Americans are blissfully ignorant to the fact that their country is falling apart. The fact that Bush is still in the Whitehouse and not in jail with Cheney illustrates how apathetic you all are. People dont hate America because of your freedom, they hate you because you are too bloody lazy and stupid to appreciate what you have. Oh that and the governments penchant for invading countries that have oil and/or brown people. THE EXPERIMENT IS FAILING. Only 231 years to go from completely free, to completely screwed. Good job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This farce is about to pop Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: No freedom for you.... Posted by: Brennt_Paris
» RE: No freedom for you.... Posted by: AlienSlave
» RE: No freedom for you.... Posted by: EagleMB
» RE: No freedom for you.... Posted by: runner
I don't know...
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 19, 2007 4:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If people are rude and inconsiderate with their cell phones, how will they be with public nakedness? Think about it for a moment, but only for a moment.

Maybe this works in Scandanavian countries where everyone is beautiful, blond, shy and reserved...and it's too cold to be naked for most of the year. Americans are loud, boisterous, obnoxious, obese, and much more...Are you sure you want to add naked to that list?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't know...After a while Posted by: littlemanintheboat
» RE: I don't know... Posted by: themotie
» RE: I don't know... Posted by: Doubtom
» You are pretty rude yourself Posted by: Gravitas
» you haven't seen rude yet Posted by: skipp
I would like to see Amercian women protest.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Apr 19, 2007 4:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The high price of womens' clothing should be protested by a day of "Clothes Off."

Millions of nude and naked women walking around in protest may do something to bring the price of womens clothing back to market competition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Watch the media and the men. Posted by: SayBlade
Carie
Posted by: Taraerin on Apr 19, 2007 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Another, perhaps sobering, reality: America has the highest teenage pregnancy rate in the industrialized world, according to the American Association of Pediatrics, and a rate that exceeds the Dutch by nine-fold. A healthy attitude to nudity as well as sex, something the Dutch are regaled for, might have a positive impact as more exposure typically leads to greater information."

As stated in this article above this is quite true. Europeans have a healthier image of what human sexuality is. It is not the act of having sex. Human sexuality encompasses your own being, your whole life.
Siecus.org reflects these highlights for comprehensive sexuality education:
Sexuality is a natural and healthy part of living.

All persons are sexual.

Sexuality includes physical, ethical, social, spiritual, psychological, and emotional dimensions.

Every person has dignity and self-worth.

Young people should view themselves as unique and worthwhile individuals within the context of their cultural heritage.

Individuals express their sexuality in varied ways.

Parents should be the primary sexuality educators of their children.

Families provide their children's first education about sexuality.

Families share their values about sexuality with their children.

In a pluralistic society, people should respect and accept the diversity of values and beliefs about sexuality that exist in a community.

Sexual relationships should never be coercive or exploitative.

All children should be loved and cared for.

All sexual decisions have effects or consequences.

All persons have the right and the obligation to make responsible sexual choices.

Individuals, families, and society benefit when children are able to discuss sexuality with their parents and/or other trusted adults.

Young people develop their values about sexuality as part of becoming adults.

Young people explore their sexuality as a natural process of achieving sexual maturity.

Premature involvement in sexual behaviors poses risks.

Abstaining from sexual intercourse is the most effective method of preventing pregnancy and STD/HIV.

Young people who are involved in sexual relationships need access to information about health-care services.

Too often people like some of the religious right have their own perversions of sex and construe things out of cartoons. In my own opinion they have a sexual dysfunction issue.
Abstinence only education is on the chopping block now because we know it does not work. In Europe they don't have problems with high ratios of teen pregnancy, STD's etc. because they have a healthy idea of what human sexuality it. It is the US that is profoundly messed up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen Posted by: hbw
Bodily Repression can Lead to Dysfunction
Posted by: Seyazou on Apr 19, 2007 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hypocrisy in this country regarding nudity and sexuality is vexing. For all the sanctimonious outrage that was produced by Janet Jackson's exposed nipple, or the naked chocolate Jesus, we as a country produce the great majority of the world's hardcore pornography. We are titillated by blurred and pixilated body parts on any of Jerry Springer's on-stage fights, we pump hundreds of millions into movie studio coffers to be teased by young women and men in highly revealing clothes; yet never completely nude; and of course there's the gratuitous violence.

I believe centuries of Puritanical ethic regarding sex and nudity have poisoned American society. That we have so many pedophiles, rapists, etc., I believe is a side effect of sexual and bodily expression. Associating nudity with sexuality is not entirely a bad thing, nor is it to be unexpected, but associating ANY nudity with sexuality can lead to perversion; even more so in a society obsessed with youth - and especially sexualizing youth; which may explain in part a lot of child molesters.

My girlfriend is from New Jersey, but spent several years living in Amsterdam where the local culture certainly rubbed off on her. Nudity is not shunned in her household (she has 3 kids) and when her and I are alone, spending the day together, we go around in the nude; a first for me because I was initially self conscious about it, but soon got used to it. My own attitudes about nudity have changed, though I was never a prude anyway.

While I believe attitudes towards nudity in this country will not change anytime soon (as long as the religious right - itself a hot bed of sexual and mental dysfunction - retains a grip on much of middle America), it would do us good to de-mystify the human body, desexualize it and see it for what it is - God's creation through millions of years of evolution and environmental adaptation, and nothing at all to be ashamed of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It is perfectly possible... Posted by: D_comp
Sexual repression
Posted by: Wish on Apr 19, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it that it's always those "religious" zealots (and I use the term 'religious' loosely, cause it has nothing to do with some faith) who loathe nudity, sexuality, sex etc?
They deny their very being, as we ARE sexual beings.
If "god" has created us, he did so with sexuality in mind. Thus, these lunatics are actually rejecting the very "god" they say they so proudly defend (as if an almight "god" needs any defending by puny humans...).
These people are só sexually repressed.
And mind you, it's not just the socalled 'christians'.

But okay, if they want to live a limited, repressed joyless life, so be it. But nooooo, they want everybody else to live a neutered life also.
Read the definition of 'sect'. It almost all applies for these big 'organized religions'.

'Shame' is something big and defines everything in your life; defines all the things you think (and the mind only looks for trouble and problems). Of yourself AND of others.
Take judgements for instance: Jesus didn't judge, but 'religious' people do nothing but judge. Again, they defy the one they call their savior. Talking about sin...
To learn what all your shame is, and free yourself from that shame, let's you live freely, interact freely, connect. Let's you live in harmony with others.

Why is it that 'religious' people are amongst the most aggresive and violent people? What do you think (sexual) repression does?
Is it any wonder the USA is such a violent nation? With so much hate, hypocrisy, etc etc?
Repression let's all the feelings and emotions fester, boil. And it has to go somewhere. Sexual repression is part of it.

BVreak free from those deceitful religions, and start believing in yourself, in humanity, in nature, in this world, in life itself. All your repressions and fake believes, you give your children. Your children are traumatized right away from birth.
But well, I guess you want your children to become the very self-righteous tightasses like you are, not?

Holland is not the worst place to live in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sexual repression Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Sexual repression Posted by: Benjaminsjw
» RE: Sexual repression Posted by: Benjaminsjw
Freedom
Posted by: mizipi on Apr 19, 2007 6:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the USA, one is free to do .............well almost anything, if that includes getting a low-paying job at Walmart or McD's. One is free to nit-pick the Bible for sin (e.g. abortion is a sin, though Jesus never condemned abortion, but he condemned divorce and I don't hear no steenkin' TV preachers bitchin' 'bout D-I-V-O-R-C-E). Like the article stated, almost naked models can advertise underwear on TV, good Republicans can talk about ED (as a 9 year old girl asks her mama, "What is erectile dysfunction?"), blow-jobs are a reason for impeachment, though lying about others and starting a war that cost billion$ each month.....
We Americans live in the most sinful, prudish nation in the world (even the Bible says "the love of money is the root of all evil" as every politico talks about economic development). So let's all "git nekkid and smoke a joint" to celebrate our FREEDOM!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Freedom...Amen! Posted by: vangogh69
Maybe it's not all about sex
Posted by: mwildfire on Apr 19, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of this is because we equate nudity with sexual come-on, but could it be that another reason Americans are so uptight about nudity is the other thing it symbolizes...honesty and openness? Seems to me a deep dishonesty is at the crux of this nation's character. We love to punish "criminals" because we project our own sins onto them, and imagine that if we punish them hard enough, we can free ourselves of guilt. Every time there's a serial killer in the news--right now for example--there is a society-wide orgy of hand-wringing emotionalism, and virtually nobody admits how much we all get off on the whole thing. As a society, we avert our eyes from the implications of the fact that we're using at least a quarter of the whole world's resources; oil is starting to run low; and our supposed leader has suddenly decided on thin evidence that we must establish bases all over the oil-rich countries, eliminate their leaders, and slaughter millions of their people.
Naked? Hell, we can't even go downtown in a full set of clothes--we have to have a Humvee to armor us against the world...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe it's not all about sex Posted by: MartianBachelor
The History of Sex---TOTALLY CENSORED on cable TV
Posted by: zooeyhall on Apr 19, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About a year ago--it was either HBO or the History Channel that aired a program called "The History of Sex--Uncensored". The promos ballyhooed it as such. And indeed it was a very scholarly and fascinating documentary on the attitudes towards sex from ancient Egypt through Roman times down to modern history.

While the narrative content was unsurpassed, the visual part was virtually incomprehensible. There were so many floating blobs during the sequences depicting ancient Roman sexual art, for example, as to make it almost impossible to follow what the narrator was describing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Claire Taylor hit the nail on the head
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Apr 19, 2007 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I think this ties into yesterday's article pretty well too. If we were exposed to more naked people of all ages, then women wouldn't be so obsessed with their bodies. As it is today, you generally dont see a naked (or nearly naked) female unless she's really hot.

I want to lose my lunch thinking about millions of exposed fat rolls... we're so far gone that we're pretty much forced to remained clothed out of decency. Honestly I think seeing a really fat naked body is worse than seeing an old naked body.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Most definitely agree Posted by: tlCampbell
» RE: Most definitely agree Posted by: EagleMB
» I think that... Posted by: vangogh69
A good argument for not going to Europe
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Apr 19, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yecch. Please keep your clothes on, and don't sit on anything if you're naked. I'm not religious & am gay - call me a repressed American if you want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A good argument for not going to Europe Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: Um, just because someone is gay... Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: A good argument for not going to Europe Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: A good argument for not going to Europe Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
Who cares about being naked when our kids are dying in Iraq?
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 19, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New rule for AlterNet: There should be one topic per day about Iraq -- ranging from brain trauma caused by roadside bombs and the medical care returning GIs aren’t getting, to the corrupt military-industrial complex and war profiteering by Republican neocons.

In the past five days, AlterNet has posted 30 articles for comment and just one pertained to Iraq (“Chomsky and Zinn on Patriotism in America”). So who runs AlterNet’s editorial board anyway -– Karl Rove?

Here’s a suggestion. Each day, rather than publish an article about Iraq, post a question for discussion -- such as “Should GIs be patrolling Baghdad?”

Hugh E. Scott, disgusted Vietnam veteran and the editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You nailed it, Ellie1. Posted by: HughScott
» Great idea, symcokid! Posted by: HughScott
» You kind of are a windbag Posted by: skipp
» Naked Emperors Posted by: hbw
Only in America
Posted by: willymack on Apr 19, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would car manufacturers make a car with a vinyl roof covering or phony convertable top, and only here would there be enough rubes to actually BUY anything that tacky. Why is anyone surprized that a few twisted minds can convince so many people here that sex, or anything that reminds one of sex, is naughty, immoral, or abnormal? We've been set up practically since day one to accept the word of various charlatans as the TRUTH, and therefore the WAY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only in America Posted by: Doubtom
Prescription:
Posted by: CriminallySane on Apr 19, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What this country needs is a good enema.

(I can't take sole for that, I do forget who said it first...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prescription: Oops Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: Prescription: Oops Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Prescription: Oops Posted by: CriminallySane
» RE: Prescription: Oops Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Prescription: Posted by: willymack
THE INSANITY OF "SAFETY THROUGH FEAR"
Posted by: jethro on Apr 19, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For those "WHO'VE EARS TO SEE AND EYES TO HEAR".For a spiritual aspect: "THE POWER OF MYTH"(I recommend the two dvd set (Bill Moyers interviewing creator Joseph Cambell over last two summers of his life at George Lucas's Skywalker Ranch) you'll want to watch it over and over!) , THE POWER OF NOW! by ECKHART TOLLE. For a profound look at how people actually become physically addicted to the emotions they experience most often(for a lot of people that emotion is "FEAR")look for the movie (best chance of finding it at web site!)"WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW"!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Are Americans Afraid of Being Naked?
Posted by: pfm on Apr 19, 2007 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being naked in private or public, oh my God, my mother would have a heart attack. It’s sinful, shameful, to think of the lustful ideas which will be visited upon those who view such nudity. I have often wondered why in America we have such a twisted view of nudity. We pay to see it on the stage shows along Las Vegas’ mega casinos. We promote it with our topless bars. We support it with our attachment to the “porn” pervasive on the internet. But we can’t openly discuss it. We prefer it would seem to support that which is camouflaged, concealed, hidden or disguised. We are afraid to be seen for who and what we are. Is it any surprise then, that “we” are afraid in the face of nudity…?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nine times outta ten...
Posted by: Habaro on Apr 19, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the people who like to strut around naked are the oblivious mutant slobs you don't wanna look at anyways. So, until our Imperial, FDA-approved corporate diet and lifestyle puts on its new clothes, I'm down with the current consensus on nudity. Besides, last time I checked, "wrong" was pop-culture's latest code word for "hot". And isn't everything about hotness these days? So let's keep nudity wrong.
On the plus side though, public nudity may help slow down our reproductive rates and food consumption considering we'll all lose our appetites for both sex and food. I guess I don't know quite what to think, but one thing's for sure: I don't want to be bombarded by saggy boobs, smelly asses, fat rolls, and hairy turtle-dicks in my daily travels. Maybe its an acquired taste, though...

Sorry if I offended any gross people--and no, I don't think I'm perfect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nine times outta ten... Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Nine times outta ten... Posted by: Habaro
» RE: Nine times outta ten... Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Nine times outta ten... Posted by: Bbear41
» RE: Nine times outta ten... Posted by: Habaro
Nude Is Good
Posted by: hbw on Apr 19, 2007 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as more than 50 million American adults have used marijuana and have no problem with it, a larger percentage of the population than you might think has been naked in the great outdoors, or even in public places. But it is still not truly accepted here. Women who appear naked are "sluts," men are "perverts."

Even worse, there are so many males here who feel their manhood threatened in the presence of a naked man. The tyranny of the majority is even more tragic because it stems from a deeply ingrained societal neurosis, ('scuze teh Big Words).

I see public nudity as a political expression, like the Baring Witness project. My screen name hbw stands for Houston Bare Witness. I envision a nation that does not fear the human body, especially when that body is less than ideal.

I'm encouraged by the current crop of young Americans, especially Burners, who seem to understand the meaning of the word "freedom" a lot better than even the Boomers with their hippie baggage. They understand that an exposed penis is not a dangerous weapon, that nudity is natural and not necessarily sexual, but indeed that nature itself is sexual and there's nothing wrong with it. The Burners, like their recent ancestors, may "grow up" and look back on their 20s with horror, but I sure hope not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Forgot This Link Posted by: hbw
Do
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Apr 19, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you really want to see helen thomas naked?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, quickly...
Posted by: vangogh69 on Apr 19, 2007 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a whole host of reasons why America has the sexual reputation it does, many of which are beyond the scope of my comments here. I will say, however, that we can thank the founders of this country who were to a large degree Puritanical individualist missionarians in their thinking and who, unfortunately, were our forefathers.

Everything in the US is sexualized, except god forbid, sex itself! Only here do we make a big deal out of a pop star's nipple (something we all have, let's get over ourselves please!) while not making a big deal about how the athlete's at the Superbowl make more in a season than some teachers do in a lifetime! The religious right: kiss my ass! Your brand of hypocricy and self-denial is almost as offensive as your desire to make everyone else as miserable as you are!

As someone who has lived outside of the US and been among people who didn't have the same hangups about nudity as US citizens, I can say that yes, not everyone has the perfect body, but on the whole, they seemed to be more comfortable in their own skin than here (in the US). Also, they were in much better shape. Perha