Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Frightening New Normalcy of Hating Your Body

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted April 18, 2007.


Thinness and beauty are prerequisites for perfection, which to today's young women appears to be the only road to happiness. Under that logic, women's bodies have become places where that drive for perfection -- however self-destructive -- gets played out.
04182007story
0418207story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Courtney E. Martin

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This article is excerpted from "Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters" by Courtney E. Martin. Copyright 2007 by Courtney E. Martin. Reprinted by permission of Free Press, a division of Simon and Schuster, Inc.

There is a girl, right now, staring in a mirror in Des Moines, scrutinizing her widening hips. There is a girl, right now, spinning like a hamster on speed in a gym on the fifth floor of a building in Boston, promising herself dinner if she goes two more miles. There is a girl, right now, trying to wedge herself into a dress two sizes too small in a Savannah shopping mall, chastising herself for being so lazy and fat. There is a girl, right now, in a London bathroom, trying not to get any vomit on her aunt's toilet seat. There is a girl, right now, in Berlin, cutting a cube of cheese and an apple into barely visible pieces to eat for her dinner.

Our bodies are places where our drive for perfection gets played out. Food is all around us, as are meals and the pressure that goes with them. Well-intentioned after-school specials teach us, from a very young age, how to purge our snacks. We are inundated with information about "good" and "bad" foods, the most effective workout regiments, the latest technological advancements in plastic surgery. We demand flawlessness in our appearance -- the outer manifestation of our inner dictators.

To some degree, this makes sense. People in general like to look at a pretty face -- which means they also like to be friends with a pretty face, do business with a pretty face, and marry a pretty face. Attractive people are desired and coddled in our society; they have an easier time getting jobs, finding boyfriends and girlfriends, getting parts in music videos, simply getting the average waiter's attention.

Even smart girls must be beautiful, even athletes must be feminine. Corporate CEOs, public intellectuals, and even accountants must be thin. Lorie, an 18-year-old from Portland, Maine, wrote, "Everyone wants to be skinny, because in life the skinny one gets the guy, the job, the love." A 10-year-old I interviewed in Santa Fe, N.M., broke it down for me even further: "It is better to be pretty, which means thin and mean, than to be ugly, which means fat and nice. That's just how it is."

The body is the perfect battleground for perfect-girl tendencies because it is tangible, measurable, obvious. It takes four long years to see "summa cum laude" etched across our college diplomas, but stepping on a scale can instantly tell us whether we have succeeded or failed.

The cruel irony is that although we become totally obsessed with the daily measures of how "good" or "bad" we are (refused dessert = good; didn't have time to go to the gym = bad), there is no finish line. This weight preoccupation will never lead us anywhere. It is a maniacal maze that always spits you out at the same point it sucked you up: wanting. We keep chasing after perfection as if it is an achievable goal, when really it is the most grand and painful of all mirages.

Beauty is the first impression of total success. Social psychologists call this the halo effect: We see one aspect of a person -- such as her nice hair -- and assume a host of other things about her -- that she is wealthy, effective and powerful. Looking good indicates control, dedication, grace. If you are beautiful, we learn, you are probably rich, lucky, and loved. You are probably sought after, seen, envied. You probably have ample opportunities for dates and promotions. Our generation does not generally equate beauty with stupidity the way our parents or grandparents sometimes did. Beautiful, to us, has come in savvy packages -- Tyra Banks creating her own empire, Candace Bushnell writing her way into found-hundred-dollar Manolo Blahniks.

If you are beautiful we have concluded, you can construct the perfect life -- even if you are not brilliant, well-educated, or courageous -- because the world will offer itself up to you. By contrast, if you are overweight -- even if you are brilliance, dynamic, funny and dedicated -- you have no chance at the perfect life. Thinness and beauty are the prerequisites for perfection, which to my generation appears to be the only road to happiness.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: dieting, perfectionism, eating disorders

Courtney E. Martin is a writer, teacher and filmmaker living in Brooklyn. She is currently working on a book on her generation's obsession with food and fitness, "Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters," which will be published by Free Press in spring of 2007. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not enough women are pursuing natural beauty and health
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 18, 2007 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem isn't that women are pursuing thinnes and beauty (so many aren't), it is that not enough are doing it naturally. Let's be clear: the vast majority of the female population (who are drawn from thin stock from around the world) have the potential to be thin, healthy and beautiful. This was the case before the 1980s, so why can't it be the case now?

What we have right now is a sinister conspiracy perpetuated by the fast food industry to try and make being fat normal. They use the talk of civil rights and the whole victim mentality to claim obese lazy people are 'normal'.

Go take a trip to Europe and see all the beautiful and thin women who are racially the same as most Americans. It can be done.

The less time spent with this pathetic excuse for feminism that is all the 'beauty myth' Naomi Wolf's of the world, and instead accept that beauty is the natural state for most people when they are healthy and fit, then we will get somewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» a switch went off? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» what if Posted by: Laplandi
One guy's prospective
Posted by: chomsky on Apr 18, 2007 1:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During my time in high school and college, I have had the good fortune of dating a fair share of remarkable, intelligent, and beautiful young women. One sad thing I noticed is that every woman I've ever dated has issues with their bodies. This disturbed me because I felt they were all exceptionally beautiful, and it was clearly our cultures fault for forcing conformist and unrealistic standards of beauty.

I personally don't buy into society's ideal image of female beautiful: tall, long hair, fair skin, perfect proportions, skinny, big breasts. I think of this image as the "Barbie doll" paradigm, and women who look like that turn me off. Not there there is anything inherently bad about looking this way, it's just that I've had that image ingrained in my mind so many times, it just doesn't seem natural or authentically human. I'm attracted women who have natural beauty, a healthy physique (not too skinny or too fat), unique qualities, and most of all, don't look like Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, or any other Barbie doll look alike. I find subtle imperfections often add to one's personal beauty, that absolute normalcy looks unhealthy and inhuman.

Maybe I'm shallow and obsessed with the body in a different way, but I like to think I prefer a much healthier type of physical beauty. The monolithic beauty culture dominant now is just far too unhealthy, and I'm surprised many people still find it attractive. I'll take a natural girl with curves any day of the week, especially one who can speak a foreign language.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One guy's prospective Posted by: Benjaminsjw
» RE: One guy's prospective Posted by: suprmark
» RE: One guy's prospective Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: One guy's prospective Posted by: Benjaminsjw
» Here, here! Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Here, here! Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: Here, here! Posted by: divadiva
» Agreed Posted by: Krotos
» MOst men... Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: One guy's prospective Posted by: divadiva
The frightening normalcy of superficiality
Posted by: Benjaminsjw on Apr 18, 2007 2:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Attractiveness sits not on the outside, but on the inside. Really!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Narcissism
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 18, 2007 3:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we supposed to feel bad that some of you became the annoying, self-centered cheerleader who had money, looks, opportunities, etc., and couldn't get enough of those things? Or that you were obsessed with becoming one of those people, but didn't reach the ideal?

The pattern continues, and now you're whining about how your narcissism was imposed by something outside you, like society, the advertising industry, or whatever. It's still all about you. Good luck in therapy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Narcissism Posted by: MartianBachelor
» Hmm... Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Hmm... Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Hmm... Posted by: peacefullaim
Extreme competitiveness of society
Posted by: medstudgeek on Apr 18, 2007 3:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could it be that part of the problem is that the overall competitiveness of society has gone up? Seems to me that with a larger gap between rich and poor translating into a larger variance in outcomes depending on your individual traits, beauty becomes more urgent as getting a good job becomes more urgent so you can keep health insurance etc.

Granted the specific focus on beauty in women is largely due to an attractiveness orientation in men (just as men are, in large part, obsessed with becoming powerful because women like powerful men), but seeing as there have been paeans to the beauty of women going back to the Iliad it makes more sense to smooth things out between the top and bottom than to try to change people's standards of attractiveness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: extreme competitiveness of society Posted by: MartianBachelor
» health and fertitlity??... Posted by: Annapurna1
So let me get this straight...
Posted by: H_H on Apr 18, 2007 3:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women are perfectly competent adults, capable of voting, making their own decisions and running their own lives... but they're brainwashing into working-out at the gym and going on diets?

In that case, how competent can they be if they can't tell the difference between a magazine ad and real life?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We ain't nothing but mammals Posted by: medstudgeek
I don't know if I can deal with this anymore...
Posted by: ann83 on Apr 18, 2007 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know, as a middle class white 23 year old female, I feel that this book is supposed to be written explicitly for my 18-25 year old demographic. However, and I know this sounds terrible, and I'm going to get lots of flack for this but...I...kind of...don't care? I know, I wish there was a way to convey my concern about all these women supposedly suffering from eating disorders, but I just can't do it anymore. I too had my issues with my body at the age of 15-16, but I guess I sort of got over it. I just feel that if we keep reproducing the fact that women supposedly hate their bodies through books such as these, they will continue to hate their bodies. These women's magazines that tell us that 99% of women hate their bodies (i made that up, I don't know the actual statistic)? What population did they pull that poll from?! Upper middle class white women! Hell, every time I read Courtney Martin's column in the Metro NYC, I feel that, wow, I don't hate my body? I must be special. But I'm not.

And, I'd hate to bring this up, but let's not forget the fact that an exorbitant amount of people don't have enough to eat. Frankly, I prefer focusing on them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Capitalism is... Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Capitalism is... Posted by: ann83
» poverty as a link to obesity Posted by: divadiva
» I totally agree with you Posted by: rclord
What about the obesity epidemic?
Posted by: Catherine Martell on Apr 18, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this pressure to be thin and beautiful, and yet all around us the far more prevalent trend is people puffing up like blowfish. Observation suggests that this relentless drive for perfectionism is a minority pursuit.

I agree that women are rewarded or denigrated for their looks far more than men are, and that as a consequence there is plenty of pressure to look "acceptable", as defined by your culture, and disproportionate rewards for those who look better than acceptable. But this article doesn't seem to touch on why this situation might exist, or why it affects women more than men. I don't buy the line that it's some sort of innate perfectionism - what causes that, then?

Really, this whole piece just seems like an excuse for the writer to talk about herself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I blam men! Posted by: jwc
» RE: I blam men! Posted by: chomsky
» RE: I blam men! Posted by: Badger1492
» RE: What about the obesity epidemic? Posted by: sunflwrmoonbeam
» As far as the US goes Posted by: vangogh69
What's a girl to do???
Posted by: jwc on Apr 18, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last week we had an article telling us that fat, lazy women don't like their bodies, now we have an article telling us that thin, athletic women don't like their bodies. How are women supposed to know what to look like if Alternet can't make up its mind?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Shhhh, a secret ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Shhhh, a secret ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Shhhh, a secret ... Posted by: MartianBachelor
» Hot bods Posted by: Torgo
» and lets' not forget... Posted by: bornxeyed
» It's all about moderation Posted by: chomsky
The other side of the coin
Posted by: artemisia on Apr 18, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's interesting that so much of these posts are focused only on the surface issues like weight and looks. Which, granted, the article is about, but some underlying issues are sidestepped. As a society, we have a hard time accepting and loving entire persons. People are written off based on their looks all the time.

Sure there is a biological element to wanting attractiveness around you. But as high functioning creatures, our needs tend to extend beyond biology.

I suspect I won't get tons of sympathy (that's ok) But I find it interesting that no matter which point of the spectrum you're considered to fall on, as far as your looks go, this focus on surface appearances can wind up being emotionally damaging to young women.

I've been told many times that I'm beautiful. That's far from being a bad thing. I'm also smart and funny and a talented artist. I get a fair amount of "yeah, yeah, babe, that's nice, whatever." It takes a toll on a person's sense of self. You start wondering, does the rest of me matter? Does anyone notice or care who I am as a person? Does anyone see me as a person? What will happen when I lose my looks someday? Will I cease to matter? A close friend of mine who was overweight as a teenager, felt equally invisible, just in a different way.

We really lose out by not considering the whole person we're making judgements about.

My point is (to make a short story long) the mystique we've built over appearances and the damage it can cause to our intrapersonal relationships, extends far beyond an advertising campaign and needs to be addressed in a more wholistic manner. How we treat each other on a daily basis, even the subtle stuff matters. I suspect it happens to guys on all ends of the spectrum too, maybe it's more pronounced in women.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The other side of the coin Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: The other side of the coin Posted by: demidesigrrl
stereotype
Posted by: ktm on Apr 18, 2007 5:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as another 23 year old middle class female weighing in on this issue, i would hazard a guess that this problem is perpetuated by women enforcing it on other women, rather than men. don't get me wrong, i am in the same boat as a lot of other posters in thinking that this is kind of a smaller issue than the burgeoning obesity problem, but still, most of the pressure i have felt about this has not been enforced by a need to look attractive to men, but a need to fit in with other women.

girls who like thier body often pretend not to in order to fit in with the 'in' model of self-deprecation. i have had so many conversations in which a girlfriend was bitching and bitching about her body and the expected me reply with a denial and then offer up some self-hatred of my own. but just sepaking from personal experience i have found it to be astromonically more likely for a girlfriend of mine to raise her eyebrows when i order a cheeseburger than my boyfriend is.. or in fact, any guy is.

women are enforcing this stereotype on themselves... and here is the thing, the majority eventually wisen up. like with peer pressure, as you get older it gets easier to deal with... and if a women isn't capable of dealing with this in a healthy way by the time she reachs her twenties she needs therapy.

this is a maturity issue, not a crisis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stereotype Posted by: liberalibrarian
» RE: stereotype Posted by: ann83
» RE: stereotype Posted by: MartianBachelor
"A Waist is A Terrible Thing to Mind"
Posted by: drricklippin on Apr 18, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a physician who is trained in Preventive Medicine (not Psychiatry) I became involved in a series of projects launched in the early 1990's that attempted, through the Arts, to reverse this sick American obsession with thinness and body perfection among U.S. women.

One project was a set of sculptures that depicted nude women from ages 8 through 80 years of many diverse body shapes and sizes (often primarily genetically determined)-
each accompanied by a poem. One sculpture was that of a nude woman who had lost a breast to mastectomy.This set of sculptures and poems travelled around the nation to mostly medical facilities but other venues as well.

EACH SCULPTURE AND POEM WERE BEAUTIFUL

So the arts including plays, film, poems and music ,but especially the visual arts like scupture and painting, are excellent antidotes to the toxic mind poison stimuli that the U.S. mass media and mass advertising culture put forth to U.S women especially young females who are especially vulnerable to such stimuli.

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa
Http://medicalcrises.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the body image of those with deformities?
Posted by: radiohead on Apr 18, 2007 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a couple of comments.

Articles like this focus on the distorted body image of middle to upper middle class white girls. What about the body image of women with physical deformities? I think we have more valid reason to have poor self esteem and body image issues but nobody pays attention to us. Perhaps because it is true we are/will be marginalized our entire lives from becoming successful people according to the present rules of the game which rewards the young, skinny, beautiful, and rich with degrees from prestigous universities? Lends credence to the fact that these beautiful skinny young things are valued more by society than the rest of us; they merit books written about them. The NYT just had an article on these perfect young women.

I left an Ivy League school last year because the entire school, and my program, was full of beautiful, young, skinny, hypercompetitive and successful young women. Glorious young thoroughbreds. When you don't fit that mold it hurts too damn much to be around these people. I didn't belong there. I'm too old, poor, working class, and have a noticeable spinal deformity. I felt like I was back in high school with the cliques, yet again. What self confidence I had was a sham and I felt one inch high. Now I'm in another school with older women with imperfect bodies and real lives.

There's a whole generation of us throwaway women out there, slightly older women who have deforming scoliosis and other physical issues, who were told we would never amount to much and nobody paid attention. What about us? Oh yeah, when these glorious young girls become older, they'll discover how throwaway they are, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I agree it is sad and anti-human Posted by: MartianBachelor
» THANK YOU! Posted by: vangogh69
» "stay on topic"? er how stupid are you? Posted by: insulaparadigm
Another article on twenty something young women
Posted by: xenacat on Apr 18, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that is excedingly boring especially as Alternet seems to post them weekly. Alternet apparently has a tiresome predeliction for the shallow worries of young, college educated white women. Irratating to say the least since there are other female demographics at risk and other issues around our cultural obession with unattainable standards of beauty (for male & females) that I'd rather see explored in an intelligent manner. There are myriad health and cultural issues around wieght, beauty and aging (surgical multilations for a "more youthful" appearance, anyone?) that deserve this space more than the heavily recycled subject in this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

beauty matters
Posted by: okcamp on Apr 18, 2007 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
show me a successful man--star athlete, musician, VP of a Fortune 500 Company--whose wife or girlfriend is not beautiful with a perfect white smile and big breasts.

do you think that women don't notice that? that unless they have a certain 'look' there will be doors that they will never be able to walk through.

and it isn't just young women. women with saggy eyelids or excess chin will be less likely to be promoted on the job or even hired. it's sad that women feel the need to undergo plastic surgery, but the reality is, in many cases it is necessary if they want to achieve their goals.

right or wrong.....beauty matters, and women know it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: beauty matters Posted by: jasonk
» RE: beauty matters Posted by: divadiva
» Melinda Gates isn't that cute. Posted by: medstudgeek
Why do we care about this when skeletal humans are starving in Darfur?
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Apr 18, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do we care about this when skeletal humans are starving in Darfur, ? When college students turn assassins? When thug culture is destroying another generation of youngsters? When polar bears are doomed to extinction? When hundreds of thousands of civilians are being murdered in Iraq...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Um, what is "thug culture?" Posted by: vangogh69
» RE: Um, what is "thug culture?" Posted by: veggiegrrrl
why are so many of you
Posted by: vwaites on Apr 18, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
being so mean? None of the commentators, it seems, have ever suffered from an eating disorder. The comments left by kepstein7777 and ann83, whome seem to think it's all made up of already skinny preppy girls (who were maybe not very nice to them in high school?) are heartless. I have had eating an eating disorder since i was seven. First i was overweight because i stuffed down the pain of sexual abuse and wanted to cover my developong body with fat so no one would come near me. Then as i got older and other children were mean to me because of my weight, i went the other way and tried to shrivel myself and my developing breasts. And oh, how i was praised for my sudden weight loss by peers AND ADULTS. Since high school, I have made other friends who had eating disorders over the years. I met them in college, in the work force--not that we even talk about food (and our lack of eating it/ purging it) at first meeting, we just recognized a common pain. But the pain wasn't about our relationship with food, it was with our history of being abused. We strived for perfection, feeling if we were perfect in every other way, it would atone for guilt and shame we have...

Not all girls with eating disorders have been abused, but a large fraction of us have. So, try to have a little sympathy. When I read some of the reactions, i felt ridiculed, looked down on. Nice, healthy outside enforcements for people who already hate themselves. You don't know who is reading your words. Please, for those of us out here fighting ourselves everyday to lead a true, food-filled, healthy life--choose them carefully.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» nice one, hypocrite Posted by: ezilla
» RE: nice one, hypocrite Posted by: hellofriends
» Yes you are too being mean. . . Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Yes you are too being mean. . . Posted by: insulaparadigm
BMI
Posted by: sunflwrmoonbeam on Apr 18, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's crazy about all this backlash against anorexia is that we (society, doctors) still expect people to adjust their bodies to fit within the BMI chart. For those of you who don't know, the BMI chart is a total piece of crap. It was created in the 1800's by a Belgian mathematician do describe body size; it was not created by any medical board, nor was it designed to tell people how much they should weigh. Of course, that's what they're doing now.

Schools are now publicly weighing kids and sending home their BMI's on their report cards. 14 year old girls, who look normal and healthy, are being told they're "obese" by their doctors. And we're constantly told that if we don't fit into this narrow range (I think the range for my height is 30 pounds), regardless of athletic ability and body composition, that we're going to die terrible deaths from our fat. It's ridiculous!

I personally eat pretty darn well and exercise regularly. I'm healthier and more active than I've ever been (including when I was 7). Yet, at 23, I'm also the heaviest I've ever been. According to these damn charts, I'm overweight and pushing into obese. I wear a size 10 and I feel and look great. But the doctors think I should cut back calories until I lose weight. Well, I only eat 1500 a day! What do they want, me to starve myself?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BMI Posted by: vwaites
» RE: BMI Posted by: sunflwrmoonbeam
» RE: BMI Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: BMI Posted by: Benjaminsjw
» RE: BMI Posted by: vwaites
» RE: BMI Posted by: Benjaminsjw
» what they measure... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: BMI Posted by: ezilla
» RE: BMI Posted by: Benjaminsjw
Look to the ancestral environment! That's the key
Posted by: haystack1317 on Apr 18, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The key to understanding many current problems is to remember that we are evolved to live in tribal groups of hunter/gatherers with limited exposure to others outside our group. The tendency to like fruit, for example, serves all primates well due to the vitamin content, but in our current world the corresponding love of sugar has created a diabetes and obesity epidemic beyond imagining. Corporate America knows how to exploit our evolved traits for profit, with no regard for the consequences, and the proliferation of images of the "perfect physique" has created an epidemic of focus on the physical that is at least as much a problem as disease in this country. The same companies that sell you soft drinks and junk food are selling you cable service, magazines, movies, etc., that decry the bodies that consuming mass-produced foods create. (Then they go on to sell you weight loss products and advice, etc., as if they are compassionate and understanding of your plight, often in magazines that simultaneously display hundreds of images of unattainable perfection.)

Purely physical perfection is unattainable because it is artificial. I worked with an extremely famous actress on a film once. At one point, I saw her in front of me live, and simultaneously saw the monitor, which is what the camera was capturing. The experience taught me a lot. As I watched her in the same living space with me, she seemed like herself, another one of the people in the room, and a wonderful one, like everyone else. But what I saw on the monitor was a different story. The artificiality of the camera transformed her into an idyllic image that was truly startling in its power. But, it was ARTIFICIAL. I'm all for art, of course, but I really learned a lesson at this moment. Comparing real people to artifical means of reproducing their images can be a fatal error.

It will always be part of our evolutionary make-up to have a physical attraction to women who seem young and healthy. It will also always be part of our make-up to be attracted to women who are smart, strong, and compassionate. Have you ever seen a female model (since we're talking about women) who seemed very appealing and then heard her speak? The perspective changes completely. Personally, I've never heard a model speak who seemed anywhere near as attractive afterwards as she was beforehand. On the contrary, I've had thousands of experiences where women who don't look like magazine covers prove to be extremely attractive due to this reality: people are inseparable combinations of countless different qualities, and in the real world in which we're evolved to live, attractiveness is always based on the complete person.

One hundred years ago, before the proliferation of these images, do you think women were as focused on the physical exclusively? Twenty-thousand years ago, when we were still living mostly in the types of environments for which we evolved, do you think anyone other than the most completely balanced woman could ever be the most attractive partner?

I say, look for and resist the tendency for the corporate world to manipulate your evolutionary traits at all cost. Don't let them turn your natural taste for fruit into an addiction to Coca-Cola and eventually diabetes. Don't let them turn only one side of your sense of who people are, the surface, which is the only one they can control, into an even worse disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said! I couldn't agree more. nm Posted by: plantsareneat
Heartless?
Posted by: ann83 on Apr 18, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know I do apologize, I thought I would get a whole lot more attacks on my post like this. Thanks for disagreeing with me. (however, please say something more intelligent than that we were picked on by white skinny girls in high school...i grew up in eastern north carolina where 60% of my peers were african american, so once again please don't assume silly things like this, it simply weakens the intelligence of your argument).

But, I just think that books such as this reproduce the argument that every girl has an eating disorder. And these girls make one of my friends, who suffers from poly cystic ovarian syndrome and has been struggling with her weight for years simply mad! It is her, actually, who have made me angry with the "every girl hates her body" syndrome that women's self help books and magazines seem to constantly reproduce.

And heartless? I'm currently getting a master's in social work planning on pursuing a career in community organizing for the human rights of sex workers and the transgendered community. Please, attack my argument, and not me personally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Heartless?
Posted by: vwaites on Apr 18, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for that.

My 'picked on comment' was more toward the the other commenter who specified 'cheerleader', and i didn't seperate that. (though implying that my saying so was less than inteligent--well, it could be seen as insulting. However, I'm just going to chalk that up to the nature of blogging).

I was hurt and angry, and i apologize for calling you heartless--as i don't know you personally or what you do, only by these comments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Heartless? Posted by: ann83
Sorry!
Posted by: ann83 on Apr 18, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The comment above was supposed to be a reply to why are so many of you...

And I didn't mean to post it twice! Slow computers are a nuisance at times...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT ELSE IS NEW ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 18, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, if there's a woman out there (old or young) who likes what she sees in the mirror you certainly tried hard to change all that. I understand that you write for a living. Is it also your calling to insult and demean women ? Ever notice that men don't toleralte this crap from each other. Men don't bother to write about each others short comings. They think their fine just the way they are. I suggest that women do the same. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not entirely true Posted by: Krotos
» RE: Not entirely true Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: WHAT ELSE IS NEW ? Posted by: jimidee
» RE: WHAT ELSE IS NEW ? Posted by: VZEQICVA
Frightening
Posted by: redbrownandblueparty on Apr 18, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea of hating the body has deep roots that go far deeper than food. I was raised Catholic and feared for my soul that I would go to hell for even thinking dirty thoughts, much less for the mortal (death dealing) sin of masturbation. Hatred of the body is deeply imbedded in consciousness. The so called "new normalcy" is not new at all. Hating the body produces a deep pain, usually far beneath the surface, resulting in a fixation on the body, and various attempts to fix the problem, which of course "fixes" it right where it is stuck. Corporatism (an interesting correlation with corpse) rides this hate to make money, inflating the fat to get people addicted, and then creating thinness/scarcity to drive the prices up. One poster referred to "surface issues"; the bosses keep sheeple distracted with circuses so they do not go deep and develop "character." The "disease of affluence" is promoted by the affluent so that our culture is one huge "eating disorder." Junk food, supermarkets, restaurants, convenience stores, sodas, pesticides, agribusiness, GMO's are stockmarket scams demanded by shareholders to fatten for the money kill/bill, unnatural disasters in view of the way our distant ancestors lived, as noted by a poster. Hell, I can't even find iodized salt now without sugar in it. Natural beauty demands a revolution from this fat/flatland ugliness. The bible got it 1/3 right when it said money is the root of all evil. It just left out power and sex, the other two arms of the body hating patriarchy, which especially hates women, but that's a whole other issue. I think of Hillary and how made up she is to sell her. I think of women's magazines and all the money men are making off of them. I heard that the CIA funded Ms. Magazine to get women into the marketplace so they could be taxed and their children in daycare so they could be indoctrinated. I feel so sad for women and their children. The RedBrownBlue party attacks patriarchy and promotes The Lover Government with a symbolic womam as its centerpiece. The womem's movement has not yet gathered together its true source of strength which is philosophical and ontological. Alternet does a service by floating articles like this, but they just scratch the surface. The depths are in the sexual bodies of womem. The flip side of this so called hatred of bodies is the love of these bodies, even and especially those bodies that are not perfect and even deformed. I have found that even in the most apparently enlighened circles, bodies are subtly put down, and I believe this degradation has disastrous effects, usually unbeknownst to the body denier. The body is conscious and hears everything the mind says and doesn't say, and it certainly feels the emotional consequences. Those thoroughbred Barbie dolls with corporate jocks are just setting themselves up for a fall. It's all a game of consciousness. Godus loves us whatever we do. Thanks for all this delicious food for thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]