Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Inmates vs. Animals: U.S. Fails the Test of Civilization

By Ben Zipperer, AlterNet. Posted April 18, 2007.


Winston Churchill once said that one of the most unfailing tests of a civilization lies in how a country treats its criminals. In the U.S., people stand by as the incarcerated are disenfranchised and pay money to seem them exploited -- even pummeled by bulls.
Advertisement

Legend has it that in the fifth century the Asian monk Telemachus ran into a Roman arena to stop the brutality of the gladitorial games. For his interruption, the indignant crowd stoned him to death, but his actions impressed Emperor Honorius enough to put an end to the fights.

The past millenium and a half has arguably witnessed a general improvement in the cultural level of society, in particular many countries having preserved and extended their intolerance of sports that brutally exploit the disadvantaged. Today even cock fighting and pitting canines against each other are illegal in most industrialized nations.

Remnants of gladitorial combat nevertheless persist, notably at two prison rodeos in Angola, La., and McAlester, Okla., where Americans buy tickets to watch inmates wrestle bulls and participate in crowd favorites like "Convict Poker." Also called "Mexican Sweat," the poker game consists of four prisoners who sit expectantly around a red card table. A 1,500-pound bull is unleashed, and the last convict to remain sitting wins. Especially thrilling for the audience is the chaotic finale "Money the Hard Way" in which more than a dozen inmates scramble to snatch a poker chip dangling from the horns of another raging bull.

Unlike prisoners of ancient Rome, convicts at the annual Angola and Oklahoma State rodeos aren't physically forced to compete in the games, or even executed after their performance. Instead, they're paid handsomely -- upwards of $200 for winning "Convict Poker," or $100 for successfully grabbing the chip in "Money the Hard Way." A tour guide clarifies the basic economics: "Since $100 is worth about four months' pay to these hardened criminals, be ready for one hell of a scrap for that c-note."

There are of course some ethical concerns. When "someone raises a question about the propriety of the rodeo," a Washington Post article explains, the focus remains on the abuse of bulls and broncos, like the pleas of the animal rights group PETA to cancel the rodeo on animal cruelty grounds. An official from In Defense of Animals writes elsewhere that the event provides inmates with "the right to torment and abuse frightened animals in front of a cheering audience." Moral questions don't arise about the propriety of cheering while bulls pummel convicts.

Prison rodeos may be rare, but it shouldn't be surprising that the mainstream toleration they receive stems from the willingness of the United States to incarcerate 2.2 million of its people. While less than one out of every 20 humans lives in the United States, almost one quarter of the world's prisoners sit in American jails. The U.S. criminal justice system has no parallel in the contemporary world. History, however, reveals the origins of the system's scope, in addition to the national obsession of denying criminal offenders the decency and rights normally afforded to other humans.

More Americans in prison

In the international race to incarcerate, the United States dominates, with few rivals and no rich countries within shouting distance. Incarceration rates across countries are best measured as shares of national populations. Last year, for every 100,000 people in the United States, 738 were in prison. Second-place Russia, whom the United States succeeded in 2000, currently boasts a rate of 603, but the only other OECD country with a rate above 200 is Poland at 229. The U.K. incarceration rate of 145 is the highest of any Western European country. Although African-Americans suffer the greatest relative burden of U.S. imprisonment, the incarceration rate for whites in the United States is still more than three times the OECD average.

To its credit, the United States hasn't always imprisoned such a large share of its population. Incarceration rates were steady, sometimes falling, and always below 200 throughout the 1960s and early 1970s. The prison population rate rose sharply from 1973 to 1980, and then skyrocketed, more than tripling over the past 25 years.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: prison labor, incarceration

Ben Zipperer is a research assistant at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Are we failing the test of civilization?
Posted by: Lector on Apr 18, 2007 2:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Civilizations seem to assign their own values. If the communal mind filters all its culture through a particular lens which constitutes tradition and that culture is sick or insane then it’s a difficult question to answer. The dictionary’s definition of civilization is also meaningless when you try to explain what ‘civilized’ means. So there is no "true" definition and you can't "prove" a definition but I suppose we have to settle on a starting point even though we don’t like or understand it. Do we take a social Darwinist view or some religious view that simplifies and answers all the unanswerable questions?

Robert Lightfoot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

prison
Posted by: jmndodge on Apr 18, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It should be noted that prison and jail are different. Spending a lifetime ministry in rural areas, I spent a great deal of time in jail ministry, often to the displeasure of my congregation. Jail involved local people who were convicted of minor offenses, awaiting their trials, or in and out of jail time again and again. While "Prison ministries" gains lots of support and interest, it involves a congregation in doing good witih money and helping others at a distance. "Jail" ministry is a commitment for the distance, you get the total package, the family, the debts, the return offenses, the call for help in the middle of the night. I would be interested in the numbers of people affected by jail-- the few night visits while waiting for some kind of plea bargin. Anyone have those numbers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Umm, what did Churchill know about civilization?
Posted by: gourdman on Apr 18, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why quote Churchill as a measure of how civilized societies should behave?

This is the man who said, "I do not understand the squeamishness about the use of gas. I am strongly in favour of using poisonous gas against uncivilised tribes."

Pore over multiple quotes by the man, and he comes across as a well-spoken boor somewhere to the right of our own beloved Ronald Reagan.

I agree that we should treat our prisoners humanely. But Churchill's "insight" should not be the lead for this article: you lost me with the first paragraph!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Churchill was civilization Posted by: Swedish liberal
» Churchill quotes Posted by: Swedish liberal
The knowledge exists to stop criminals from committing crimes
Posted by: DrSuess on Apr 18, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 1990’s a great social experiment occurred in the country Senegal in Africa. The Transendental Meditation program brought to the world by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was taught to all of the prisoners in the country. When TM was introduced into the prison system, there was an immediate and very dramatic drop in crime within the prison, and also a drop in the stress related illness rate.
The prisons in Senegal differ from America- here prisoners have a “fixed” sentence. There the President of the country lets them out with “amnesties” from time to time. Several months after the TM program was introduced, the amnesty was given, and the prisoners were released. The return to prison rate prior to the introduction of TM was close to the world wide norm of 80%. After the amnesty- the return rate was less than 20% and the prisons of Senegal stood empty for 6 months until other people came in to fill them.
The effect of TM has been documented in country after country. From Switzerland to Sweden to Australia, this works all over the world. It even worked in the US with hells Angels in Folsum prison in California. But right now TM is not allowed in the US prisons. The religious right has declared TM a “foreign” religion, and has pushed it out.
Under President Regan- the prisons declared that “nothing works” and began the lock them up and throw away the key mindset that prevails now. The Prison Wardens all know about the hundreds of scientific studies that show that TM works- but the throw away the key mindset is too strong in America today to open the doors to rehabilitation.
The saddest thing about this is that it is unnecessary. One reason people often give is that we lock people up because we don’t know how to deal with their actions, and solve the social problems that give rise to them. But the knowledge exists, and it is America that is rejecting the solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New York State mentally ill inmates.....
Posted by: picket on Apr 18, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
had a legal win this week ...an article today 4/18/07 in the Albany Times Union by Paul Grondahl

The legal win came after 5 years of litigation and two weeks of a non jury trial in NYC. Among other things the settlement bans..

"...stripping naked mentally inmates suffering acute psychotic episode, segregating them in Plexiglas-walled cubicles and leaving them with nothing but a thin pad on a cement floor."

"...the use of punitive 'restricted diets', a loaf made from bread and cabbage, for punishment."

The punishment is going to prison not torture while under the care of others, especially sick human beings, and then...releasing them into society untreated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ultimate measure of civilization isn't prisoner treatment
Posted by: eddie torres on Apr 18, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the sophistication of a society's middlemen.

I can buy shares in New York for Corrections Corporation of America (CXW) at $54 each - up from $51 last Friday.

A broker will charge a fee for the transaction. The company's officers (CEO, CFO, etc) and board directors will become wealthier if enough Americans also want to buy shares, driving up the share price for something that they were privileged enough to purchase for $1 or less early in CCA's history. And if the stock's value stays stable for a while, it might become a 'blue chip' and be sought after by institutional investors like pension funds and insurers.

If more Americans are incarcerated, the demand for CCA's services increase. Which also increases the share price.

And everyone gets rich, right?

Oh yeah, Winston Churchill was a fat drunk blowhard. Even the English acknowledge it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It wasn't Churchill. It was Gandhi.
Posted by: bunnyhugger on Apr 18, 2007 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gandhi, not Churchill, is known for saying: "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." Knowing the source puts the comment in a much different light.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You betcha!!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Apr 18, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are failing the tests of civiization on many fronts, from our methods of incarceration to our disregard for the victims of natural disasters like hurricanes Katrina and Rita; to our occupation of Iraq and subjugation of its people for the sake of stealing their oil, and the underequipping of our soldiers for that purpose; to our virtually unregulated loan and credit card industries that entrap our citizens, along with the onerous anti-bankruptcy bill that condemns the unlucky to a life of servitude; to our nearly complete disregard for the health of Americans, forcing them into poverty due to health emergencies; to our denial of the very real problem of global warming, and our enormous contribution to that problem with our greedy economic style; and to our high infant mortality rate and shorter-than-average life expectancy, both indications of the ill-health of our society.

Oh, yes, we are failing the tests of civilization on nearly every front –– but, hey! we turned rap music and "American Idol" into BIG MONEY! Mission accomplished, I guess. . . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not fix the sub-headline?
Posted by: Nona Nym on Apr 26, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Churchill to the side, it's not grammatical:

"In the U.S., people stand by as the incarcerated are disenfranchised and pay money to seem them exploited -- even pummeled by bulls."

Surely what was meant was "...pay to see them exploited..."?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]