Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Imus Got His Trash Talk Pass Yanked, Now Yank it for Blacks Who Talk The Same

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, New America Media. Posted April 10, 2007.


Why do so many blacks storm the barricades in fury against a Richards or an Imus but are stone silent, or utter only the feeblest of protests when blacks bash and trash?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"Can U Control Yo 'H.'" The video commercial of the high priest of gangster rap Snoop Doggy Dogg demands on his CD "R&G: (Rhythm and Gangsta)." Then Dr. Dre in the cut "Housewife" on his 2001 CD "Dr Dre 2001," says, "Naw 'h' is short for honey." Next rappers Beanie Sigel says, "Watch Your 'Bs'" on his def Jam release, and 50 Cent commands, "'B' choose with me" on his 2003 top ten track P.I.M.P.

That's just a light sampling of how gangster rappers, some black filmmakers, and comedians routinely reduce young black women to "stuff," "Bs," "H's" and "MFs." Their contempt reinforces the slut image of black women and sends the message that violence, mistreatment, and verbal abuse of black women are socially acceptable.

Despite lawsuits, protests and boycotts by women's groups, gangster-themed films and rap music continue to soar in popularity. Hollywood and the record companies rake in small fortunes off of them, and so do the rappers.

Now enter shock jock Don Imus. He's the latest white guy to be transformed into a racially and gender incorrect punching bag for his Michael Richardsesque racial and gender tirade against a group of young black women. He, of course, has been verbally mugged, battered, abused, and momentarily dumped from his radio and TV show.

Imus has genuflected, no groveled, to the Reverend Al Sharpton, civil rights leaders, the Rutgers women's basketball team, begging forgiveness. Imus certainly deserves the kick in the shins that he's getting. In his very public self-flagellation, even he admitted that he rocketed way past the line of what even by the raunchy and low road standards of shock jockism is considered acceptable.

But again, Imus, as a white man that spewed racial bile, is the softest of soft targets. The same can't be said for the black rap shock jocks. They made Imus possible. They gave him the rappers bad housekeeping seal of approval to bash and trash black women.

In many ways, their artistic degradation has had even more damaging consequences for young black women. Homicide now ranks as one of the leading causes of deaths of young black females. A black woman is far more likely to be raped than a white woman and slightly more likely to be the victim of domestic violence than a white woman.

Their assailants are not white racist cops or Klan nightriders but other black males. The media often magnifies and sensationalizes crimes by black men against white women, but ignores or downplays crimes against black women. The verbal demeaning of black women has made them the scapegoats for many of the crisis social problems in American society.

What's even more galling is that some blacks cite a litany of excuses, such as poverty, broken homes, and abuse, to excuse the sexual abuse and violence of top black male artists. These explanations for the misdeeds of rappers and singers are phony and self-serving. The ones who have landed hard in a court docket are anything but hard-core, dysfunctional, poverty types. P. Diddy, who predated R. Kelly as the poster boy for music malevolence is college educated and hails from a middle-class home, typified the fraud that these artists are up-from-the-ghetto, self-made men.

The daunting puzzle then remains why so many blacks storm the barricades in fury against a Richards or an Imus but are stone silent, or utter only the feeblest of protests when blacks bash and trash? Or even worse, tacitly condone their verbal abuse?

There are two reasons for that. Blacks have been the ancient target of racial stereotypes, negative typecasting, and mockery. This has made them hypersensitive to any real or perceived racial slight from whites. That's totally understandable, and civil rights leaders are right to call the legion of other white celebrities, politicians and public figures that get caught with their racial pants hanging down on the carpet for their racial gaffes, slips, or outright verbal broadsides.

The second reason is that blacks fear that if they publicly air their dirty racial laundry it will be gleefully twisted, mangled, and distorted into a fresh round of black bashing by whites. But that's a lame reason for not speaking out, and speaking out loudly against those blacks who either out of ignorance or for profit, or both, routinely commercialize racial and gender trash talk. That failure fuels the suspicion that blacks, and especially black leaders, are more than willing to play the race card, and call a white a bigot, when it serves their interest, but will circle the wagons and defend any black who comes under fire for bigotry, or for any other malfeasance.

The same standard of racial accountability must apply whether the racial and gender offender is an Imus or a 50 Cent. When it doesn't that's a double standard and that always translates into hypocrisy. Imus got his trash talk pass yanked. Now let's yank it from those blacks who do the same, or worse.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: racism, imus

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a political analyst and social issues commentator, and the author of the book, The Emerging Black GOP Majority (Middle Passage Press, September 2006), a hard-hitting look at Bush and the GOP's court of black voters.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They Are Not Under Arrest Yet?
Posted by: hole11 on Apr 10, 2007 2:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How long do you think they can go with this behavior with no accountability? Blacks don't have to apologize for their language or misuse of same. They have to gain respect with their fellow peers just as you have to go in debt to attend a college like Rutgers without a basketball scholarship.

If they can't get notoriety with their mouth then what? They get dissed by everyone like a mutt. They get dogged out by their competitors. How does it look if you just walk away? Looks like you have your tail between your legs.

This discussion isn't going to change corporate America and the US armed forces view that blacks (women) have to have their hair straightened.

You can call anyone a ho. Just as you can call anyone a dick. It isn't sexist. Nappy isn't racist. It's a perception that these people will not or are not fitting in with the rest of society.

People in the public eye should be looked at with a critical eye. They should be made fun of or humiliated every once in a while. Imus or anyone.

Everytime I played basketball someone trashed talked to me and you didn't hear me say that person should be fired. LA Riots and blacks had something to say to me on racial tones. You know it's not really just the sign of the times. It's how we feel. I am not hurt. I don't hold prejudices. But we live in a competitive world and someone is always going to try to bring you down through words or action. Best to stay focused and realize the only person that is going to be made better is you because of it. It's not a tail between the legs it's not letting others becoming an obstacle to your goals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They Are Not Under Arrest Yet? Posted by: xconservative
» RE: They Are Not Under Arrest Yet? Posted by: xconservative
» Response To The Above Two Posted by: hole11
» RE: esponse To The Above Two Posted by: xconservative
» RE: IMUS VS. RAP Posted by: narrowrule
» RE: IMUS VS. RAP Posted by: hole11
» RE: Mencia and Chappelle Posted by: sasquuatch55
pt
Posted by: ptboya on Apr 10, 2007 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I'm happy to see Imus, who's been using racial slurs for years, be kicked in the ass, I'm happy to see this double standard discussed. When my daughter was being abused some 15 years ago by boys in the class calling her bitch and ho, I complained to the administration during a PTA meeting. I pointed out that they would never tolerate a child calling another 'nigger.' Such a transgression would demand some pretty serious reprogramming of the kid's mind. Then why tolerate similar denigration of women? To my surprise they responded by treating disrespect of the girls in the class the same way they would treat dissing of culture, ethnicity or race.
So my question here is directed to any African American reader who continues to tolerate rapper disrespect of women. Please explain why Imus = bad, rapper = good does not equate to racism. Isn't this double standard entirely rooted in culture, race and/or ethnicity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pt Posted by: ALANHESTER
R South
Posted by: R South on Apr 10, 2007 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I don't understand is how people forget that people buying all this rap music are not Black people they are White people and the rich white men who are head of these record companies should bear some responsibility in the matter. I am so tired of black people being blamed for every damn thing. No body else came to this county bound in chains and degraded for hundred's of years. Damn all Black people are not worthless peice of sh**. I know plenty of hard working Black people with families and they go to work everyday and take sh** from White america on a daily basis. F*** america I am going to move to Iraq where I can get some subsidized gas, housing, food and every damn thing else this administration pay for over there. Signed a hardworking educated nappy headed ho

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: South Posted by: krampc04
» RE: South Posted by: eddiemyboy1
» RE: South Posted by: uptownsteve
pt
Posted by: ptboya on Apr 10, 2007 3:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hole 11,

You strike me as being in total denial. It's really not possible for conscious humans to dismiss the meanings of language. Language is one of our most basic features. People can be injured by intolerance and disrepect as much as by violence. I think it was Douglas who said something like it is not the sting of the whip that hurts but the humiliation involved.

You repeatedly talk of tail between legs. Haven't you seen that peoples who have been discriminated against often live out thier whole lives with tails between legs? It's the humiliation that hurts. While it may provide protection of a sort to act like you're impervious to insult, it also tends to reduce sensitivity. In the end the shell you build diminishes your experience of the world. Like a turtle you become constricted, immobilized by your shell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: pt Posted by: hole11
Try to get the FACTS straight.........
Posted by: ekipnrut on Apr 10, 2007 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RE: Let's hope you learn to read and comprehend
[Report this comment]
Posted by: ekipnrut on Mar 3, 2007 1:36 PM (in response to this comment):
I can only hope that whatever replaces hip-hop as the next trend supplants the violence that this GHETTO crap promotes with something more melodious and peaceful.
==============
(my citation and comment):
We critics, however, were vindicated by a study published earlier this year by the University of Chicago. Data from the "Black Youth Project'' indicated that while 58 percent of blacks
between ages 15 and 25 listen to hip-hop daily, most are dissatisfied with it. They find the subject matter is too violent, and women too often portrayed in offensive ways. Such feelings hint at a dirty little secret of the music business: Blacks are used largely to validate musical themes being marketed to the WHITE mainstream. In other words, while 90 percent of commercial rap artists on TV and radio are black, the target audience lies outside the black community.
...What part of 'WHITE' ...as in non 'ghetto' ......don't you understand??? /// Hutchinson is basically correct in his concluding two summary remarks as to the 'why' of race based Black aggression or reticence regarding response to white hate speech or Black hate rap respectively. However curtailing the proliferation of often white (corporate)
financed and marketed 'culturporn' will require complete community control of neighborhood environments that serve
to socialize and 'educate' youth ,starting with the school systems at the preschool level. The main 'players' in the mix
would have to have explained to them, in ways they can easily
grasp...'game over'. Of course they would be free to continue whatever they do as (amongst one another) consenting adults....but the choke chain(s) on them in terms of forays around the children would be of pencil girth and unrelenting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jets_ya
Posted by: jets_ya on Apr 10, 2007 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The second reason is that blacks fear that if they publicly air their dirty racial laundry it will be gleefully twisted, mangled, and distorted into a fresh round of black bashing by whites. But that's a lame reason for not speaking out, and speaking out loudly against those blacks who either out of ignorance or for profit, or both, routinely commercialize racial and gender trash talk. That failure fuels the suspicion that blacks, and especially black leaders, are more than willing to play the race card, and call a white a bigot, when it serves their interest, but will circle the wagons and defend any black who comes under fire for bigotry, or for any other malfeasance.

This should be published in every major newspaper across this land, and repeated by every talk show host. This should be a challenge to all concerned black parents, grandparents, and all chuch elders. The harm being pepetuated thru these noxious rap lyrics and songs, dispersed by black and white and Jewish run record companies should be challenged for whar they are: trash disguised as a life-style.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jets_ya Posted by: ALANHESTER
Killing Free Speach as an Alternative to Action
Posted by: BobbyGreyFriar on Apr 10, 2007 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Words may have a majical power to enrage and inflame; but censorship not only does not represent anything positve in terms of dealing with what amounts to institutional racism in this country, amoung other things; but it may also create problems in that it will provide a powerful weapon for silencing political dissent. Hate speach ought to be condememd, but it also ought to be just put up with--no exeptions. The alternative, and the only thing positive that will come out of censorship, is giving the powers that be the authority to define what is offensive--inveriably what's deemed offensive will be what is deemed to be a threat to those powers--i.e., sustantive criticims of, or pointing out the harm done by, Government and corporations.

Incidently, I think a lot of the current hysteria regarding "hate speach" is a symptom of hypocrisy--there's no outrage about the racial disparity in prison populations for example; there is a little from "alternative" souces, but none from the mainstream. It is easy to condem hate speach becuase we are not guilty of it, at least in public--whereas, we are all guilty, to the extent that we have political influnce, for the way society is set up (and if serious in of professed liberalism ought to be taking action to change things--many couragious individuals, who are "out of history", lost their lives during the Civil Rights era; how cowardly we, so called progressives, ie, are in comparison).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We love being offended.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 11, 2007 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We love the drama and we love a good witch burning. We can't wait for some big mouth to step over some arbitrary PC line so we can take his words and beat him nearly to death with them...then watch him crawl on the ground and beg our forgiveness.

It gives us a certain satisfaction...something to rally around, be self-righteous about, feel superior about. It breaks up the boredom of our daily lives.

Then we go and complain to our neighbor about the "elements" taking over our neighborhood...or how politicians are too soft on "criminals", "welfare leeches" and so on. Use the proper code words, and you're not a racist.

Good point about the double-standard. It opens up a can of worms about many other double-standards. It's a whole other discussion that could get interesting, but wouldn't be very PC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious!
Posted by: panamanyc on Apr 11, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't get me wrong, its Rev. Al's job to open his mouth when something like this happens. Hes got the mic and will always get people thinking.

The PROBLEM is exactly what the author notes which is Rev. Al and Gwen Ifill and others are and will be puting out little fires and whacking little weeds, when what they should be doing is uprooting it. In the long run your only fooling yourself and wallowing in complacency by not looking at the roots of the problem - where Imus got his remarks from in the first place, black rap artists.

A black rap artisits with a song in his album about "my ho" or "bitch, shut up!" is like the relationship betwen loud and New York. Its a given.

I heard the Rutgers women saying they've been traumatized by all this. Wow. And Dre, Snoop, 50 and countless others saying 10x worse for years and years hasn't?

Rev. Al, Jesse Jackson, and every black leader in earnest needs to get serious about the root causes.

Imus got those remarks directly from the mouths of the millions of black men that support this negative attitude about black women. By not saying anything just b/c rappers make millions, black leaders tacitly endorse it as well.

Don't feign innocence and come crying now. Get serious!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: sincere
» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: panamanyc
» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: sincere
» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: panamanyc
» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: sincere
» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: panamanyc
» RE: Yo Rev. Al, Get Serious! Posted by: xgroverx
Thank you
Posted by: talkville on Apr 11, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a cogent and eminently reasonable position on this case of the exploding sound-byte. One can only hope that the tenor of this discussion prevails as opposed to what has so far been rampant on the MSM and the internet. I admire most of all the response of the Rutgers women themselves - and its a sad reflection on journalism as to the questions they elected to ask them.

A sub-text most indicative during their conference was their own expression of distress at what has been occurring for quite a long while: the instrumentalization and abuse of youth and its distribution along racial, gender and class lines. All of us supposed "adults" need to take a lesson from that team- regardless of our own race, gender or class.

And thanks again to the author for the article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gee Earl
Posted by: uptownsteve on Apr 11, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like you are morphing into Larry Elder Jr.

Earl, be for real.

The rappers that you mention do not regularly host the political leaders of America!!

McCain, Kerry, Dodd, Cheney and even Obama have regularly appeared on Imus's program knowing full well of the constant racism and sexism that is standard fare on his show.

And Earl why are you limiting your rage to black rappers?

I just finished watching the Academy award winning movie "The Departed".

The "N" word for blacks and the "c" word for women were used promiscuously as they are in hundreds of American films.

I'm a black man who attended college and served in the military with young white men and they are just as likelly to disrespect women with slurs like the "c" word as young blacks are with the word "ho".

So stop with the weak attempt at moral relatavism, will you?

Are you bucking for a news host job at Fox TV?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: xconservative
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: xconservative
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: xconservative
» A culture wide teaching moment?? Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: A culture wide teaching moment?? Posted by: xconservative
» c'mon Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: BenjamminH
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: OhioPatriot
» RE: Your point? Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: naryaquid
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: mobile68
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: xconservative
» RE: Okay xconservative Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: DavidTbone
» RE: Gee Earl Posted by: uptownsteve
Earl Misses-- Again!
Posted by: sincere on Apr 11, 2007 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was a time I liked Earl Ofari Hutchinson. In the past few years however, he's starting to do the same old song and dance--showing up at any racial issue to create a circular firing squad around the black community and commence firing. He's becoming as uselessly contrarian as Stanley Crouch or Deborah Dickerson. And he does this repeatedly by simply leaving out important parts of the discussion--much like the news media.

When Michael Richards made his N-word comment, the media (and our guy Earl) focused on his use of the "n-word." What was often glossed over, were Richards references to historical lynching and even sodomy/mutiliation of black males (a time honored ritual in white racial violence). So the context is lost, and it quickly degenerates into a typical white apologist (and their black allies) stance of, "well blacks use it!" Never mind that the n-word is a white racist creation tied to black degredation, slavery, death, rape, oppression etc. and that its continued use by blacks reflects this toll this tormented legacy has on the psyche. Instead, by leaving out Richards allusions to historical real-life racial violence that is synonymous to the n-word, Earl and the mainstream media treated us to a side-show of "it's black people's fault for using it."

In this case, Imus is called to the carpet for using "nappy headed-hos." And as quickly as someone can say FOX News, white apologists were out en masse screamin bloody murder at the hypocrisy of black use of the term "ho" in music, etc. And Earl continues in this. What he and the media leave out, is the lager context of Imus's statements. Right after this offense comment, his guest McGuirk alludes that the Rutgers women are "Jigaboos" going up against "Wanabees" from the Spike Lee film School Daze (which they mistake for Do The Right Thing). And he and others and Imus go on to talk about the lack of femininity of the Rutgers players.

Of course, this larger context brings up an entirely different angle...that what we have here are several white men indulging in an age old intersection of sexism and racism that posits that black women are either sexually exotic or physically unattractive--at least in comparison to white women. The use of the term "Jigaboo" is probably more offensive than the "nappy headed hos." But it's left on the media cutting room floor. And so the conversation is simplified into, "well don't rappers use ho' too?" Because the white apologists (and Earl) would have a hard time talking about the use of "Jigaboo" in rap music.

So here we are, having a simple argument, because the media is lazy--or willfully lazy--and it seems, so is Earl.

Sin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bravo! Posted by: uptownsteve
» RE: Bravo! Posted by: ALANHESTER
» outrageous Posted by: DavidTbone
We're being scammed...
Posted by: greenman on Apr 11, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... by Imus and CBS. Dig: Imus makes his racist, mysoginistic remarks and is suspended for two weeks. Sponsors drop out, but for only two weeks. The tension builds... what will Imus say when he returns? After two weeks are up, Imus returns along with the sponsors, who looked good for publicly dropping him two weeks ago. Half of America tunes in, and guess what? This just happens to coincide with the beginning of ratings season What a surprise! If anyone is stupid enough to fall for this cynical stunt, they ought to be ashamed.

Greenman

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imus, Radio Networks, Sponsors: Put Money Behind Your Apologies
Posted by: Dennis Hogan on Apr 11, 2007 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, Mr. Hutchinson, thank you for a very good essay on the use of language by Imus and the Rapper videos and CDs.
and the damage the careless and cruel comments engender for so many people. I do not believe that a simple "I'm sorry" from Don Imus is adequate. He has a long history of speaking to the contrary. He has been enabled in his cruel ranting, disguised as "humor" for a long time. If Imus really wants to show that he means what he says and that he will no longer accept being "enabled" in his thoughless behavior, he will be the first to ask the networks carrying his program and the sponsors supporting it to establish an endowed chair and department at Rutgers Univ. to study and affect change and support for those not so fortunate in this world. Real money will be put into helping, for example, prostitutes, their drug and alcohol addictions, and their families, particularly their children. Maybe, just maybe, over the course of the next 10 to twenty years we will see some success stories for these children. The Rappers and the Productions companies could also be expected to channel funds into this endeavor. They do it or their products will be boycotted. Why should they profit at the expense of society? It starts with us. Write Imus and his sponsors. Let them know they have some attonment to go through. Let the CD producers know there cannot be a free ride to profits at the expense of the citizens of this land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CONFUSION
Posted by: Tommie27 on Apr 11, 2007 2:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe someone can correct if I am wrong but here goes--Nappy Head is a derogatory term invented by white men--Ho is a derogatory term invented by black Men--Does that not make Imus an equal opportunity racist??? I am totally confused! Tommie27

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: CONFUSION Posted by: sincere
» RE: CONFUSION Posted by: Tommie27
A Proposal: National Black Women's Day
Posted by: art614 on Apr 11, 2007 4:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm an outsider "looking in" (i.e., a white guy) so please understand I'm submitting this respectfully, even though I haven't been through the black experience.

What I'd absolutely LOVE to see is a national day honoring and celebrating Black Women. I've been heartbroken for years by the abuse, both verbal and otherwise, that I hear heaped upon black women by black men in "entertainment."

I congratulate Earl Ofari Hutchinson for finally calling an end to this double standard.

Yes, Imus is despicable and he should be fired--or even better, we should call for a nationwide boycott on anyone who sponsors him so that we don't have to ask that he be fired: the advertisers will take care of that themselves.

But let's finally remove this abuse totally from its mainstream--which isn't Imus but gangsta "entertainment." And I believe the best way to do that is not to boycott this entertainment (which would be ineffective since those of us who would boycott it don't buy it int he first place). Rather, the best way is to keep showing the beauty and class and achievement of the black woman, continually and in every way we can. And I think a national day to honor black women would be a good start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rappy Headed Nos
Posted by: C909 on Apr 11, 2007 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember Don I calling Katie Couric and Ann Curry "media sluts" on his show and wondered how does that work - particularly since they all are part of NBC. No excuses for Mr. I here but I think he's more mysognist than racist - just like his mysognist rapper peers who disrepect all women in their music and videos.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: played out Posted by: DavidTbone
Liberals Are Trying To Take Away Free Speech
Posted by: hole11 on Apr 11, 2007 8:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are on television or radio someone is making money off of you. I don't care if it's the University. I don't care if it's the women's basketball coach. If you are on television playing basketball for free, you are someone's ho. I don't care what kind of hair you have either. Straight, nappy, bald, pink, dirty, burnt or extensions you are still a ho.

Now anyone who doesn't understand that understand this: In other countries they will fine you or put you in jail if you ridicule the king, official or nearly anyone else in the press or in public. Ever wonder why British and German humor is so dry (France too) it's because they don't have the same freedom of speech as we do. Anyone who thinks we should just start firing or making laws to limit ridicule (I don't care if you are the pope you need to be made fun of for kissing the ground or wearing stupid dunce hats) is trying to destroy our constitution and our freedoms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Remember Donahue? Posted by: DavidTbone
» RE: emember Donahue? Posted by: hole11
Try being a black female construction electrician
Posted by: mobile68 on Apr 11, 2007 9:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try being a black female construction electrician.

If you really want to see some hate against women, go on a construction site. Or in any other male-dominated field where women are the in the minority. The hate increases when the skin of the female gets darker.

The sad part that nobody addressed in this post discussed is how women in this x-tian-democratic-freeist-society-in-the-world called the u.s.a. are still being discriminated against in the work place by mainly white men, since women were finally allowed to work jobs that are not low-paying and female dominated only 30+ years ago.

Women cannot or will not ban together to put a stop of this kind of behavior in the work place because of the fear of losing their only source of legit income.

So whatever the rappers are saying about women, though it is wrong and it seems that it is the only way to get a record deal is to put a black face on it, it has not affected me earning a living yet. It's the racism and misogony that have and is still being practiced by white men through out history that affects my bottom line.

My how we have progressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I Agree Posted by: hole11
Try being a black female construction electrician
Posted by: mobile68 on Apr 11, 2007 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try being a black female construction electrician.

If you really want to see some hate against women, go on a construction site. Or in any other male-dominated field where women are the in the minority. The hate increases when the skin of the female gets darker.

The sad part that nobody addressed in this post discussed is how women in this x-tian-democratic-freeist-society-in-the-world called the u.s.a. are still being discriminated against in the work place by mainly white men, since women were finally allowed to work jobs that are not low-paying and female dominated only 30+ years ago.

Women cannot or will not ban together to put a stop of this kind of behavior in the work place because of the fear of losing their only source of legit income.

So whatever the rappers are saying about women, though it is wrong and it seems that it is the only way to get a record deal is to put a black face on it, it has not affected me earning a living yet. It's the racism and misogony that have and is still being practiced by white men through out history that affects my bottom line.

My how we have progressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try being a black female construction electrician
Posted by: mobile68 on Apr 11, 2007 9:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try being a black female construction electrician.

If you really want to see some hate against women, go on a construction site. Or in any other male-dominated field where women are the in the minority. The hate increases when the skin of the female gets darker.

The sad part that nobody addressed in this post discussed is how women in this x-tian-democratic-freeist-society-in-the-world called the u.s.a. are still being discriminated against in the work place by mainly white men, since women were finally allowed to work jobs that are not low-paying and female dominated only 30+ years ago.

Women cannot or will not ban together to put a stop of this kind of behavior in the work place because of the fear of losing their only source of legit income.

So whatever the rappers are saying about women, though it is wrong and it seems that it is the only way to get a record deal is to put a black face on it, it has not affected me earning a living yet. It's the racism and misogony that have and is still being practiced by white men through out history that affects my bottom line.

My how we have progressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks, Earl
Posted by: sid white on Apr 12, 2007 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was happy to see this essay appear. I live in northern NE, and can't even pretend to know the black experience, but this seems to be symptom of a much-broader problem - lack of Mutual Respect. Throughout all of these Comments, the word "respect" has yet to appear. Let's try to find something positive in our life experiences so that we are not referring to one another as Mr. Imus did. My congratulations to the Rutgers women's basketball team. They have made their school and their fans just as proud as their football team did. Men and women, black and white, co-workers and strangers ALL deserve respect UNLESS they have done something to deserve disrespect - AS DON IMUS DIS'D when he used this language for self-exploitation as entertainment. We need to regain a Civil Society. I know I don't live in the "Real World" - Your World, but try to greet someone today with a smile, say Hi to your neighbor, and believe in yourself and others that something better is possible than the World that we are currently creating that fosters this type of circus as BOTH news and entertainment!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

misses the point
Posted by: PaulLev on Apr 12, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
rappers make general comments about elements of society ... Imus was specifically attacking individual, real people ... there's a world of difference between general language, be it cursing, rapping, whatever, and singling specific real people out for racist and sexist insult... Memo to Michelle Malkin re: Don Imus and rap

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: misses the point Posted by: xconservative
Cheap Article:
Posted by: John Hyperion on Apr 12, 2007 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is as cheap and irrelevant as O'Reilly's recent attempts to turn a drunk driving incident into an attack on illegal immigration. It's lazy and thoughtless to take you're pre-conceived issues with Hip Hop and insert them into this story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

White Players/Black Players
Posted by: 15delta on Apr 12, 2007 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thought I saw white women at the news conference also.
I don't remember hearing white and black ho.
In fact I didn't hear black ho.
Can someone direct me to the words that caused all this harm to the blacks?
Also just who has the tatoos?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Same for all
Posted by: Hodger_99 on Apr 12, 2007 2:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pull Savage for bashing Gays- Coulter for Liberals!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Consistent rules matter
Posted by: lamar on Apr 12, 2007 4:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree with Mr. Hutchinson re: firing Imus or any of these trash talking DJs. However, if the rule is that we're going to fire people who cross the line, then we have to apply that rule to all. I salute that consistency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To answer your question, Earl...
Posted by: neptune on Apr 12, 2007 8:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Black people - really to be accurate, we should say black folk who are descended from slaves - have not had their needs met for so long (wrongly so, I might add), that they have developed an almost pathological sense of entitlement, where the rules of civility that apply to everyone else, somehow do not apply to black folk. And lord, look out if anyone should call them on this. You're met with indignation and anger, from the likes of con men like Al Sharpton, as if the whole world owed black folk what it is they really need to find within themselves. To answer your question, Earl, it's called integrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's really not about rappers
Posted by: macktan on Apr 12, 2007 9:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The finger of blame goes round and round--the true culprits seem to get off scott free. Yes, rappers--mostly gangsta' rappers--present a hardcore view of life in which men dominate their butt-shaking hos. But in our universe of power, just how well known and influential are these performers? Black people are only 12% of the population in the U.S. Now of that number, how many are rappers who actually cut records and videos? About 0.001%? About 10 or 15 black men are professional, visible rappers. The others are wannabe's who cut beats in their basements. Are you trying to tell me that these 10 or 15 rappers are so influential that they have twisted Don Imus? An entire nation? Give me a break. Do you really accept that bs running through the media that rappers have corrupted Don Imus and all of society? If anything, their lyrics have only provided updated vocabulary for the same old s..t.

The problem with white people calling black people these names is that it represents a point of view toward a minority group that happens to be largely dependent on the resources of the majority culture for jobs, housing, schooling, etc. What person of color will feel MSNBC is a good place to work, to develop a career, to find mentors if the managers are allowed to call people jigaboos and nappy headed hos? Who would likely hire somebody that is viewed as a jigaboo? What kind of schooling would a black kid get from a teacher who sees blacks as cleaning ladies and spear chuckers?

Sure, rappers need to change their ways. But rappers don't run multi-national corporations, hire and fire, manage schools, run governments. They don't have daily talk shows that influence public policy, elections, and laws. They don't own the air waves. They don't have any impact on my path in life; they don't limit my options.

A couple of months ago, I ranted and raved about Eddie Murphy's Norbit movie. I and many other black women all over the nation were deeply offended by his monster mammy Rasputia, a grotesque version of the old Aunt Jemima stereotype. Who cared? Dreamworks responded to the outcry by stating that the movie was well received in focus groups, so there was no problem with pasting a 20 foot tall monster mammy on billboards all over the country during black history month. The movie made $30 million dollars its first weekend. Where were Rev Rough and Rev Smooth then in their newfound chivalry toward black women? Who paid a visit to Brother Murphy and told him that his movie was not cool? I contend that Rasputia was much more hurtful than Imus's silly routine.

There's just too much hypocrisy in this Imus mess to make me feel that any meaningful public debate or action is taking place. I can't believe that MSNBC or CBS suddenly discovered the things Imus was saying on his program. How often had Imus been warned? officially counseled? How had MSNBC and CBS been handling this situation all these years?

You know, over the past year, I've tried to contact the Reverends about real problems affecting our community. Jackson has never responded. Sharpton--well, he doesn't even provide a way for people to get in touch with him. They wait until CNN does a story, then rush to the scene. If your problem doesn't have media coverage, forget it.

Time for new leadership, people. I say retire the reverends; elect Barack Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sharpton: Call BET
Posted by: edith on Apr 13, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will Rev Al be demanding that programmers at BET, who consistently run videos that use the identical language Imus was canned for, be fired?

Howzabout Never?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

farmerjohn
Posted by: dutchfarm on Apr 13, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all ridiculous, the very bottom line is we have free speech in this country and if you do not like what is being said ,change the station or channel, it is as simple as that! I can't stand to watch Pat Robertson( for just one example), he cheats old ladies out of their money, is a racist, and a very close minded individual. Do I think he should be taken off the air? NO!! I just change the channel and I do not have to hear his insane ramblings:>) As easy as that!! There is no compromise on the constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech. But of course we could become more fascist and control all speech, people, GROW UP!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: farmerjohn Posted by: Raitan
What else the media is missing
Posted by: Raitan on Apr 13, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the only thing I'd like to add is that I got the distinct feeling that Imus and company were exercising a bit of ethnic resentment. Here we have a traditionally lily white school, Rutgers, being represented in a national basketball championship by African American women. The fact that they commented on the women's physical appearance was, of course, sexist, but I think that they were resentful that a "white" school like Rutgers can't muster white women to represent them in an athletic competition (the same could be said for TN perhaps, but Rutgers has to more ivy rep). Much has been made about the word "ho," but I think what took the conversation deep into the double upper cuts of racism and sexism was the use of the term "nappy-headed ho"--this invokes stereotypes of black women being unappealing compared to white women, and of course one of the standards of beauty is the distinction in hair texture--nappy being ugly, straight and fine texture being white and lovely...the comments that Imus' crew makes afterwards substantiate that this is what they had in mind, hence the jigaboo and wannabe reference...I too used to like Earl Ofari Hutchinson's column--now he is just Larry Elders light

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry, what? Posted by: NthnBrazil
Point taken... but...
Posted by: Ghoulman on Apr 13, 2007 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.. let's remember Ismus was a nationally syndicated radio host... not a rapper.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Point taken... but... Posted by: hole11
Black Radio Host Calls White Volleyball Team Stringy Haired B*tches!
Posted by: sincere on Apr 13, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Black Radio Host Calls White Volleyball Team Stringy Haired B*tches

Controversy Rages On- But is the Sex Industry and Mass Media to Blame?

April 12, 2007

A furor erupted this week when black radio host Ron Immons referred to members of the Wilmington College Beach Volleyball Team as "stringy haired b*tches." The comments took place on-air, as millions listened to the popular morning show. Immons, joking with his fellow black producers and several guests, disparaged the Wilmington all-woman, mostly white, collegiate team—going as far as comparing their match against Cal State to the movies Once Upon a Time in America and The Godfather. "It's like the Hymies vs. the Guinea-wops," Immons producer joked.

At first defending his actions and refusing to apologise, Immons has recently done an about face, and today appeared on the white action network FOX News channel to make amends to the white community. Immons called his comments "insensitive and ill-conceived," adding that "[i]t was completely inappropriate, and we can understand why people were offended." However, after being pressed by FOX hosts, Immons became irate, saying he was being held to a double standard.

"This phrase that I used didn't originate with me," Immons stated in his defense. "It originated in the white community. I'm not stupid. I've seen porn before. Pornography in America is a multi-billion dollar business. White men consume most of it. Most of it, not all, but most of it—stars white women. And in those films they use those kind of words…b*tch…slut…whore…all the time, towards other white women. I know that these young white women all through that society are demeaned and disparaged and disrespected by—by their own white men and that they are called that name, and I know that doesn't give me, obviously, any right to say it, but it doesn't give them any right to say it. That didn't give me a right to use it, but that's where it originated."

A frequent white community activist at FOX News had this to say in response:

"Just because white men use that term towards white women, doesn't mean everyone has a right to do so. It's wrong when white men do it. It's wrong when black men do it. And it was wrong when Immons did it."

Some in the white community however, aren't so sure.

"I've been called b*tch numerous times by other white men, at bars, or even during sex," one online white blogger Buffy137 said. "And I know where it comes from—the porn industry, the sex industry, our whole societal obsession with white women as sexual objects. You see it everywhere—beer commercials, movies, rock-stars with flashy women. I don't see how we can get mad when some black radio host says it, but we don't get mad when our own white men say it? We're just being hypocrites!"

Another anonymous white blogger, Megan36, however countered:

"Just because there are shortcomings in the white community doesn't mean someone in the black community can join in. I'm not a b*tch. I'm not some bimbo in a beer commercial, or a rock and roll video, or some online porn star. And neither were those women at Wilmington. If I want to perm my hair curly, that's my business. If I want to wear it natural and stringy, that's also my business. Using the porn and sex media industry is a cop out. Immons needs to be fired."

And today just that happened, as both advertisers and broadcasters dropped Immons. With a history of insensitive remarks on his show, many think this recent flap was considered as too much of a liability. But even with his dismissal, a controversy rages on in America, and especially within the white community, over the use of language in our culture.

© 2007 Your Ass Has Just Been Satired! Institute. All rights reserved

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree with you, Mr. Hutchinson
Posted by: ThatBlackChick on Apr 13, 2007 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I said pretty much the same thing on my blog, just not as eloquently. I'm really pissed off with the double standard and in my opinion, black people have no one to blame but themselves. I do not and will not support any music or person who degrades me. Thank you for pointing out the double standard but, it will not do any good. Blacks are a doomed race. I've faced this fact long ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jason whitlock
Posted by: okie11 on Apr 13, 2007 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
read jason whitlock of the kansas city star he is spot on!! www.kansascity.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More Important Issue
Posted by: wernersi on Apr 13, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I generally agree with Mr. Hutchinson, who I've never read before....and am amazed at the public internet energy generated examining our basically adolescent hugely racist mass culture by focussing on "professionally insulting equal opportunity destroyer, dyseptic, curmudgeon-like blatherer" like Imus. Would that same passion be extended to the daily war crimes committed in our name in Irag. Over 600,000 innocent victims dead while the sole sorrow focus is on 3,300 (and counting) deceased volunteer soldiers. That dead list does not include the too-little yet known private corporation mercenaries who get paid (Lord knows) how dollars more than the hapless, deluded young men "employed "by the Department of Defense!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i agree to a point
Posted by: Alw on Apr 13, 2007 3:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in a nation that just intergrated sports just some 60years ago, it's no wonder that we have closet racists in plain view. to me it's not the people who have failed but the nation itself, and the reason to me is no community nor cultural dialog, and cultures make the community, and guess what, communities make nations, which makes up the world. people need to stop living in the past and procede with dialog.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Imus incident and the Duke rape hoax
Posted by: ISlamIslam on Apr 13, 2007 10:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These two events are but the latest reasons why I will do everything in my power to avoid having anything to do with blacks as a group. If, as a white person, you say something wrong but prostrate yourself begging for forgiveness, you get nothing but a kick in the groin by the likes of criminals such as Sharpton and Jackson and blacks in general. If you've done nothing wrong but are accused of doing something awful such as gang rape by a black woman, forget it! Even so-called intellectual whites such as the Duke faculty will rush to lynch you in their effort to suck up to blacks. The best and safest thing for whites to do is to distance themselves from blacks to the extent possible to avoid such nightmares as these.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

farmerjohn
Posted by: dutchfarm on Apr 14, 2007 5:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with you on the issue that corporate needs some accountability and our federal government has failed our people terribly. But again the MOST important issue here is : In the USA we have a constitutional guarantee of freedom of speech, that is one of the things that makes us a democracy! Anyone should be able to say what they want to without censure, if you do not like it, DO NOT LISTEN, it is a very simple concept. If we are going to have censure, then WHO decides what can and cannot be said????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

older than you
Posted by: yearsago on Apr 14, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I turned on Imus one morning just after retiring and immediately turned the program off. Comments were crude, derogatory and juvenile. I have never figured out why people say these things and/or listen to them. Don Rickles was not allowed to be viewed on our TV for that reason. I don't like bullies. My kids were not allowed to talk like that, and probably as important were taught why it was wrong. My sons say I would be surprized to hear what men say about women at the work place even it they don't really believe it. Why? It is sad that the rappers mentioned in this column are allowed to say what they do. It is just as sad that economics not morals rule. Then again my kids say that even at age 73, I am naive. If believing that this is wrong makes me naive, so be it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets take this further than Snoop
Posted by: Betsyny on Apr 14, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for this article. Imus deserved exactly what he got, and why he lasted so long on air is a commentary on how juvenile, racist, and sexist many members of our society are. But Imus' comment also seemed to be a pathetic, racist attempt to imitate rappers' language. I'd love to hear from African American women who have had to grow up in an environment surrounded by these kinds of lyrics - how has that affected the way black men treat you?

But lets go further and also have some outrage for other people who spew hatred at other groups. There's a great Op-Ed piece in the New York Times today about Ann Coulter's brand of hatred. Where is the outrage at her racist, homophobic commentary, which she takes obvious glee in providing. Why does talking about 'ragheads' and 'faggots' not cost Coulter anything? That anyone gives this obviously deranged woman any attention at all is another sad commentary on many people in this country.

Can we contact the advertisers in newspapers that carry Coulter's syndicated columns to object to the level of hatred in her columns too? What about the rest of them on tv - Hannity, Limbaugh. It's harder to get those guys because they speak in code, but really, they've all got the same type of DNA.

As for Snoop, it's going to take a major education campaign to counteract that - and don't forget how much money is being made - given the pervasiveness of his music in our society. Start in the elementary schools - kids love to bug their older siblings and parents about their behavior.

After thinking about all of this, Imus' comments about a heroic girls basketball team were reprehensible, and he did deserve to be fired, but perhaps he was an easy target. The other people regularly get much more attention than Imus ever did.

So, it would be just a great development socially if people would speak out against racism, sexism, homophobia, etc by ALL public commentators. When public bigotry becomes so socially unacceptable that people wouldn't even consider making derisive comments about "others" we will indeed have progressed as a society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Censorship is bullshit
Posted by: mantra77 on Apr 14, 2007 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Black rappers are American citizens whose speech is protected by the first amendment. Who cares what they say? The issue isn't why they aren't also censored, the issue is why there is any censorship at all.

The reason black rappers aren't chastized by media, academia and the political system (collectively the opinion elite) is because those institutions are overrun by pro-minority chauvinists and bigots.

Their dogma goes something like this:

"If you go against your group interests while black you're an uncle tom, if you do so while white you're open-minded. If you express group interests while black you're standing up for your people, if you do so while white you're racist."

They enforce this dogma by practicing neo-McCartyhite persecutions (organized blacklists, intimidation and economic strangulation) against dissidents.

That's the issue. Just because we face neo-McCarthyite persecution for "racism" for expressing group interests while white doesn't mean we want everyone else to be subject to the same treatment.

"Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries."

"The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them."

"Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites."

"What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?"

"How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?"

"And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?"

"But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

"They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white."

"Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white."

http://mantra7777.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DON IMUS and RUTGERS "The Chickens have come home to roost"
Posted by: ranlove on Apr 14, 2007 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that Don Imus got fired is nothing more than the "Chickens coming home to roost" (Remember Malcom X speaking about President Kennedy when he was killed).

Please read this article with an open mind because we are discussing some racial problems that still exist in this country.

White America and mainly the white man has made many laws and rules in america that has come back to haunt him and cause him alot of pain and suffering. The reason I say the white man mainly is because he is the one who made the laws and rules to keep his own white woman oppressed and as a second class citizen.

So now think back to some of the laws and rules that were written by white america just to keep black people in america separated and oppressed. Many of the laws in america has been written and re-written to catch the black man in his web of racism.

Please keep in mind the racism that blacks in america have lived with after white europeans crossed the boarders of america and killed millions of native american indians. They stole the land from the indians and then had the guts to call the stolen land "The United States of America".

Remember the white man stole this county from the native american indians. After europeans arrived in this county this country was never united. That was one of the main reasons there was a Civil War. So as we talk about racism and chickens coming home to roost please keep an open mind.

I will give you a few incidents that has happened in this country in the past several years that are good examples of the "chickens coming home to roost".

1. The white man decided to sue OJ Simpson in a Civil Trial even though he had been found NOT GUILTY by the court system. This created a civil case feeding frenzy in america and now look at all of the white people who has been sued in civil trials since OJ Simpson. Many of these white people would have been able to keep all of their money and riches if they were not so hungry to change the laws just to go after OJ Simpson for killing a white woman and man.

2. When Justin Timberlake pulled back Janet Jackson's top and exposed her breast the country went crazy and started making all kinds of laws and penalties for those who crossed the line in media and television. Janet was "blackballed" from appearing at any future Super Bowl events. Remember around this same time the country was in a feeding frenzy over her brother Michael Jackson. The white media in this country made so many laws and penalties targeting Janet Jackson that it has now caused Don Imus to lose his job. The censorship chickens have come home to roost.

3. The white man changed his steroid rules just because Barry Bonds was getting ready to break Babe Ruth's homerun record. This steroid rule has now brought many of baseball's white heros crumbling down. During the 1970's and 1980's baseball was approxmately 30% black. Now today in 2007 it is approxmately 8% black. Now that the steroid rule is in place don't be surprised if in the next ten years baseball will again be approxmately 30% black. The reason is that if you know baseball at the high school and college level, you will find out that the majority of the white players are taking steroids just to improve their performance and make the team. This has led to a decline in black players who otherwise would have made the team. Remember black players are naturally gifted in the areas of speed, jumping and running and the majority do not take steroids. With the use of steroids the white ball player can compete and win a spot on the team. Since there will be testing for steroids you can expect a decline in the performance of white baseball players leaving the position to be filled by a naturally gifted black baseball player. History will show you that I am correct.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Ann Coulter still working?
Posted by: DataDoc on Apr 14, 2007 10:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What about all the rightwingnutjobs like Ann Coulter, Michael Savage and yes, even Rush Limbaugh who have used "ethnic" jokes, demeaning and intimidating language. Imus is a jerk, but it seems like it's OK if it's a Republican talk radio jock, but since Imus is perceived as liberal, he's going down big. Maybe that's appropriate, however I don't want to see Ann Coulter on CBS. She's much more hateful and trash-talking than Imus.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not about morality-it's about wedge issues!
Posted by: Dark Matter on Apr 16, 2007 3:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Right has performed a brillant political manuver by
redirecting this issue onto rap: they have drawn fire away
from themselves and created a "wedge issue" that can
be exploited for the presidential campaign.

Wikipedia on "Moral Panic"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic

Wikipedia on "Wedge Issue"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_issue

Mr. Hutchinson and others....in the future, when
you see a (obviously) choreographed moral panic
like this from the right, take some time to
consider whether or not you are being used......

The Republicans interest in "Black America"
only extends to getting as many of them as
possible in army uniforms and into Iraq...

and Iran...and Venezuela...and Sudan....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To the ignorance of this world--it's not just about "ho"
Posted by: ramonab on Apr 19, 2007 6:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It did not start with rappers.
Black people did not create these negative references to Black women; white people did.

We didn’t make the laws that enslaved Black women rendering them as mere property. White America did that. We didn’t make laws that justified white men raping Black women. White America did that. We didn’t create the caricature of Black women as sex objects to appease the guilty conscience of the white men who raped them at will. White America did that. We didn’t pedestalize white women and make white skin and blonde hair the epitome of feminine beauty. White America did that. We didn’t value light skinned Black women over dark-skinned Black women. White America did that. We didn’t cast light-skinned and straightened-haired Lena Horne and Dorothy Dandridge in progressive leading roles while casting dark-skinned Black women such as Pearl Bailey, Hattie McDaniel and Cicely Tyson in stereotypical and demeaning roles. White America did that.

And despite what white America did, we still resisted it. In the Sixties and Seventies we created slogans like "Black is Beautiful" to ward off the attack of white supremacist aesthetics that sought to drown our souls in self-hatred. We wore our hair in all its kinkified glory with pride. We appreciated all the hues of our Black rainbow. And how did white America respond to this act of self-determination? No, they mocked it. Then they marketed their mockery back to us and our children. We call it Blaxploitation today. It continues.

Imus’ comments do not emerge out of the Black community. Imus’ comments emerge out of a legacy of white hatred of Black people and Black women in particular. His hatred and the hatred of his people toward Black women is seeded in the same hatred of the likes of Thomas Jefferson, who while having "sexual relations" with his Black slave, Sally Hemings, was comparing the very same people to apes in his writings.

If you want to understand what lies behind the venom and hatred of the like of Imus? You need look no further than the very man and mentality behind this nation’s own Declaration of Independence. That legacy is what lies at the root of Imus’ statement. . Imus was just saying what his forefather said hundreds of years before him.
No, this castigation of Black women did not originate within the Black community. When we act in ways that are demeaning to our own selves and people, what we are doing is nothing more than the logical conclusion of hundreds of years of seasoning or socialization. This is what is called the process of mental colonization wherein the subjugated people believe the lie told to them about who they are and their self-worth. We have been trained to see ourselves through the eyes of those who despise us.

And this is not to defend what Black men in the main say and have said about Black women. For there is no defense that can be made, especially when it comes at the expense of the actual lives of young Black girls whose hopes and aspirations are dashed against the rocks of self-hatred.

Don Imus and those Duke boys have been made over in the white dominant media into martyrs. Good white men wrongly victimized by an unforgiving Black community. Programs like the "Today Show" have gone out of their way to salvage the "good name" of white men. Rather than defend the humanity of the women who were victimized both at Rutgers and Duke, white society is defending white manhood by going after Black leadership with a vengeance that would make Strom Thurmond proud.



As the attention remains on protecting these white men, the Black women of Rutgers basketball team have received death threats; the Black woman in the Duke case has had her identity revealed by the media. White America is making a loud and clear we don’t care about you or your people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement