Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fat Cat CEOs Strike Back at Congress

By Sarah Anderson and Sam Pizzigati, AlterNet. Posted April 13, 2007.


The CEOs who sit on the powerful Business Roundtable are working to stop Congress from moving ahead with executive pay reform. The reason? It's all personal.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Sarah Anderson Sam Pizzigati

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Does CEO pay in the United States need anymore fixing?

The 160 corporate CEOs who make up the Business Roundtable -- the nation's single most influential business lobbying group -- don't appear to think so. The Business Roundtable is currently leading the corporate charge against congressional efforts to legislate new checks on executive compensation.

Executive pay reforms already in place, the group's president assured Congress last month, are more than adequately addressing the concerns Americans may have about corporate behavior.

"A wave of reforms over the past five years," the Business Roundtable's John Castellani testified, "has resulted in improved investor confidence in our corporations, growth in the stock market and continued shareholder returns."

CEOs in the Business Roundtable do have one more reason -- unmentioned in Castellani's testimony -- to feel comfortable with today's executive pay status quo. They're making out like bandits.

In 2006, Business Roundtable execs took home paychecks that added up to a $9.9 million median. The comparable take-home for major corporate CEOs overall, according to just-released Wall Street Journal data: only $6.5 million.

Business Roundtable chief executives are doing even better compared to average Americans. In 2006, the CEOs who belong to the Business Roundtable saw their pay jump 10.6 percent, nearly three times more than the average wage increase of 3.7 percent that went to typical U.S. white-collar workers.

All these executive pay numbers actually understate the real pay gap in today's Corporate America. These totals, for instance, don't count the value of the towering stashes of deferred pay and pension dollars that await top execs on their retirement day.

At least 10 CEOs, researchers at the Corporate Library note, are now set to collect over $50 million in pension and deferred pay when they make their exit. AT&T CEO Ed Whitacre will walk off with $158.4 million, Occidental Petroleum CEO Ray Irani another $124 million.

We know all this because last summer the Securities and Exchange Commission, the federal agency that regulates publicly traded companies, announced new regulations that require corporations to reveal more about what they pay their top executives.

The powerful Business Roundtable publicly supports this new SEC disclosure standard -- and regularly trots out this support to demonstrate its credentials as an enlightened and responsible voice in America's corporate community. But the Business Roundtable has steadfastly opposed any efforts at CEO pay reform that go beyond disclosure or any other reforms already in place.

Two such congressional efforts are now before lawmakers.

In the House, Rep. Barney Frank's Shareholder Vote on Executive Compensation Act has already gained the approval of the Financial Services Committee. This legislation, if enacted, would give shareholders the right to take a "nonbinding" advisory vote on CEO pay plans.

In the Senate, lawmakers have passed -- as part of the minimum wage increase compromise package -- a tax code change that sets a $1 million cap on the amount of annual compensation corporate executives can have "deferred" and shielded from income tax.

Deferred pay arrangements recently helped Home Depot CEO Robert Nardelli and Pfizer chief Henry McKinnell walk off with severance packages worth about $200 million each.

McKinnell chaired the Business Roundtable from November 2003 through July 2006. His executive pals at the Roundtable are now working to deep-six the Senate deferred pay cap. At last month's House hearing on executive pay, Business Roundtable president Castellani tagged the Senate deferred pay cap and the House shareholder vote proposal as equally objectionable.

Objections from the Business Roundtable carry considerable weight. The CEOs who constitute the Business Roundtable membership lead companies that employ over 10 million workers and account for "nearly a third of the total value" on U.S. stock markets.

This enormous Business Roundtable clout on Capitol Hill, if truly focused on ending the corporate pay abuses that have average Americans upset and alarmed, could make a real difference. That's a difference that CEOs in the Business Roundtable, so far at least, apparently don't feel they can "afford" to make.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: ceo pay

Sarah Anderson, the director of the Global Economy Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, and Sam Pizzigati, the editor of the Too Much online weekly and an associate fellow at IPS, are among the co-authors of the new report "Selfish Interest: How Much Business Roundtable CEOs Stand to Lose From Real Reform of Runaway Executive Pay."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
cannibalism
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Apr 13, 2007 12:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the only way.

Eat a CEO today!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

drew
Posted by: drew on Apr 13, 2007 12:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i wanted to share a conversatin that i had with two persons who "work for a living". they were both relatively poorly paid and feel much personal and family financial stress. They still, howver, bought the meme that CEOs make jobs, employ people and are therefore deserving. They gave me a real sense that it is not just the behind the scenes manuvering and direct political influence that is maintaining this social injustice but supportive beliefs in many who are themselves being exploited that need to be addressed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I think that - Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: drew Posted by: jmonday
An irreversible culture of greed.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 13, 2007 3:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2006, for the first time ever, the top 400 richest Americans were all billionaires.

Conversely they were the biggest cheapskates in U.S. history who gave only 1 percent of their income to charity. Why? Because money has become a symbol of power -- to be hoarded, not shared.
In the past, corporate and individual greed was moderated by a progressive tax system that forced the upper class to give back some of their wealth to society. No longer. There are simply too many pigs at Washington's bipartisan trough for America to become a benevolent nation again.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, duh. How would you like it if your overpaid, underworked CongressCritter...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 13, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...told you that you were making too much money.

Does anyone know exactly how many days the last Congress actually worked? Hmmmmmm.......

On second thought, with all the damage gets done when Congress actually meets, perhaps it is actually better that they only come together occasionally. Just imagine the damage if they went to work every week day and most weekends, for ten or twelve (or more) hours like you, me, or even CEO's.

Well, thank goodness for small miracles. They'll probably take a recess before they get to debating how much is too much for all of us to earn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Act Now - Vote Against ALL directors
Posted by: babaloo on Apr 13, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Send a message to all corporations in which you own stock by voting against all directors on your proxies!
First, all the directors are aiding and abetting this mutual greed.
Second, there are no voices of reason - on many if not most slates.
Third, where are the women? Half the productivity comes from women; most of the purchases are driven by women - why aren't women on the boards in greater numbers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fat Cats... Pigs...
Posted by: outlander55 on Apr 13, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The apathy in this country is what has enabled ruthless, unethical people to take advantage of the Americans who have been vombified by the likes of American Idol, Survivor , Nascar, Sit Coms, Fast Food, and Right wing Propaganda. News Paper sales are down. Rush Limbaugh has high ratings. Most Americans are socially opiated and would rather not be bothered. They are "unaware" of how their freedoms and life have been controlled by the corporate "biggies". They hear a snippet of "news" from O'Rielly and don't bother to find out the whole story or the truth. Instant gratification. That's what they want. Let every one else worry about the important stuff. This is only an observation, but this country needs to wake up , smell the coffee, and see what a few corporate lobbyists are doing to their American Dream. The Fat Cats won't be happy until they own everything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fat Cats... Pigs... Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Fat Cats... Pigs... Posted by: bowriter
» RE: Fat Cats... Pigs... Posted by: Lincoln fan
FASB and SEC Mull U.S. Exec Pay Accounting Change
Posted by: cognitorex on Apr 13, 2007 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America's accounting chiefs, the Federal Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Security and Exchange Commission are close to deciding that salary and perks exceeding two million dollars annually can not rationally be deemed pay for work expended. Payouts of five million to hundreds of millions would quite boggle the minds of both Adam Smith and Karl Marx, said one accounting insider, "off, off, off the record."
Going forward, the recommendation will be that executive remuneration exceeding two mil annually will be construed as a disbursement of corporate capital in amounts agreed to by boards, directors, trustees and not so trust-ees as the case may be.
The new accounting Pronouncement will reflect that mega salaries in excess of the maximum two mil will be considered as an allocation of corporate capital which will no longer qualify for accounting treatment as a corporate expense.
A number of CEO's have formed a study committee particularly in response to the IRS position of "You can call it capital or you can call it Swiss cheese, we're still taxing exec' pay at the highest personal rate possible."
"There's a fundamental lack of fairness here," whiningly complained the corporate CEO's. They repeatedly pointed out, "even embezzlement is treated as a deductible expense."
Sharehoders, mostly wearing Abu Ghraib style hooding to protect their identities, were cautiously pessimistic.
cognitorex blogspot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Outsource Your CEO
Posted by: JackieHK on Apr 13, 2007 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you own a single share in any company? Set up a Web-Site called www.OwnersOf.org. Organize a quorum of shareholders (this is the hard part, and I don't know how to do it).
Force your board to downsize your current CEO and go off-shore for lowered costs. Your off-shore CEO may have a name like Venkatacharya Shankacharya, but you can call him "Vicky". The advantages are numerous:
1) Whereas your current CEO makes $ 55 million per year, Vicky will do the same job with better quality for $ 550,000. A cost reduction of 99%.
2) The additonal profit can be distributed as a special dividend to shareholders.
3) Unlike your present CEO, Vicky will realize he is not entitled to the job and will deliver.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outsource Your CEO Posted by: wallart2006
» RE: Outsource Your CEO Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Outsource Your CEO Posted by: jmonday
» RE: Outsource Your CEO Posted by: Lincoln fan
down with american corporations
Posted by: Jharyn on Apr 16, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CEO's could care less about anything but their own bank accounts. Personally, I wouldn't work for an american owned company. The upper level management is too greedy. Look at Home Depot, Circuit City, work your ass off and get layed off so that they can get bigger bonuses. The american experiment failed! The american way of life promotes selfish greed and a complete disregard for the well-being of society.
The world would be a better place if the United States was torn down and rebuilt!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]