Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Behind the Denials: Iranians and Brits Traded Prisoners

By Patrick Cockburn, CounterPunch. Posted April 6, 2007.


The stand-off over the 15 British sailors and marines captured by Iran ended with a de facto prisoner exchange, despite denials by Britain and Iran that a swap was intended.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Patrick Cockburn

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

The first sign of a breakthrough the day before yesterday was the release of Jalal Sharafi, an Iranian diplomat abducted from the streets of Baghdad two months ago, whom Iran claimed had been seized by Iraqi commandos controlled by the US. At the same time, an Iraqi Foreign Ministry official said the Iraqi government was "intensively" seeking the release of five Iranian officials captured in a US helicopter raid on a long-established Iranian liaison office in the Kurdish capital of Arbil in January. The seizure of the sailors and marines was the latest episode in a series of tit-for-tat confrontations between the US and Iran which began when the US tried to seize senior Iranian intelligence officials on an official visit to Arbil on January 11. The raid failed and only succeeded in detaining five Iranian officials at the liaison office, which has now been officially recognized as a consular office.

Senior Kurdish officials told me that the real US targets were Mohammed Jafari, the powerful deputy head of the Supreme National Security Council, and General Minojahar Frouzanda, the head of intelligence of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. They had visited President Jalal Talabani of Iraq at Dokan near Sulaimaniyah and then gone on to Arbil where they saw Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdistan regional government, at his headquarters outside the city.

The Arbil raid came a few hours after an aggressive address to the nation by President George Bush, in which he denounced Iran as America's great enemy in Iraq. It has been followed by a series of tit-for-tat incidents such as the attempted abduction of five US soldiers in a highly sophisticated attack near the holy city of Kerbala, south of Baghdad, in which the assailants first tried to take prisoner the US soldiers but later killed them. The US blamed the episode on Iraqi Shias acting as proxies for Iran.

The release of Mr Sharafi turned out to be thed trigger for release of the British hostages. He was seized in mysterious circumstances on February 4 by uniformed men. Iran and some Shia politicians in Baghdad said they were from the 36th Commando Unit of the Iraqi Army that was, in practice, controlled by the US. Mr Sharafi has now returned to Tehran. The US denies any role in his disappearance. At the same time, immediately after the Arbil raid, the US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, revealed that President Bush had approved a policy of raiding Iranian targets on Iraqi soil.

Neither Mr Sharafi, a second secretary at the embassy, nor the five Iranian officials seized in Arbil seem to have been important figures. Mr Sharafi was involved in plans to open a branch of the Iranian national bank in Baghdad. One of the captives from Arbil was described by the US as a senior officer of the Quds Force, an elite unit of Iran's Revolutionary Guards.

American and British claims that there was no connection between the capture of Iranian officials on January 11 and the seizure of the British sailors and marines was undermined on April 3 when the Iraqi Foreign Ministry official said his government was also working "intensively" for the release of those five other Iranians to "help in the release of the British sailors and marines."

In Washington, President Bush signalled the same: "I also strongly support the Prime Minister's declaration that there should be no quid pro quos when it comes to the hostages," he said.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, iran, prisoners, uk

Patrick Cockburn is the author of 'The Occupation: War, resistance and daily life in Iraq' -- a finalist for the National Book Critics' Circle Award for best non-fiction book of 2006.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They were SPIES!
Posted by: Temporary on Apr 6, 2007 12:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They ADMITTED it on live tv!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They were SPIES! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: They were SPIES! Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: They were SPIES! Posted by: Conservasaurus
War on Iran
Posted by: cuja1 on Apr 6, 2007 3:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Will a deliberate castatrophe occur, to blame on Iran, to create the war Bush wants?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My own evolving views on this.
Posted by: CriminallySane on Apr 6, 2007 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Initially, I figured this was a provocation designed to be the Gulf of Tonkin incident of this era. And there likely was some element of that to it.

What it seems now, with a little time and distance, is that it was a perfect PR coup by Iran. Grab the Brits, hold them for a while, go eyeball to eyeball with one of the more powerful (non-US) militaries around, and then close with a magnanimous release.

Poodle Tony got gamed, Iran got great PR and status.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cockburn, as always, speaks with forked tongue.
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 6, 2007 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that the release of the Iranians has now played into the release of the British hostages in no way is evidence that the Brits were captured for that specific purpose, as Cockburn maintained yesterday.

Is it a surprise that in conditions of active warfare incidents occur where hostages are taken? Cockburn's insinuation of a strategy somehow different from hostilities (of course Iran is supplying arms and personnel to the anti-American forces; of course US forces will resist Iran's incursions; duh uh) is journalist filler, because holding hostages goes on all the time--even when there's no war.

However, Cockburn's unnamed sources then are used to show how Americans are responsible for the Brit's capture rather than the British military being responsible for their own misadventure--even while the Brit hostages have already said that is the case. I did not know "never needing to say you're sorry" is a primary British trait.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ball is rolling
Posted by: Ilyan on Apr 7, 2007 2:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This seizing of Diplomats is very offensive to followers of Genghis Khan.

Americans should be aware that Temujin slaughtered whole Cities of people when his Ambassadors were killed. A World accepting USer supremacy perhaps deserves a full punishment. That includes the Moslem Nations who trade with the Agents of Satan when they could so easily bring them to their knees, even putting them completely out of business, by turning off all the Oil. The Agents of Satan have clearly bought the House of Saud, so how will the punishment be administered?

There is a new variant of rust that infects wheat that is devastatingly effective presently spreading in Africa. Western plant breeders are in a panic to reintroduce resistance into their overbred wheat, - that could take five or six years. If that rust gets into the USA ..... Why is the DOW Jones so high? Will Bush stop intercontinental Airline flights? Will they impeach him for not doing so if this rust appears in the USA this year?

Did Temujin really become a Moslem? Or was it an easy trick used by a clever Shaman to control a great Empire?

Restore the Grazing to the Horses.

Ilyan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]