Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Hang Up on War: Get a Tax Refund

By Amy Goodman, King Features Syndicate. Posted April 5, 2007.


If you are upset that Congress won't defund the war in Iraq, there's something you can do: Take the IRS up on its offer for a war tax refund.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Amy Goodman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you are upset that Congress won't defund the war in Iraq, there's something you can do: Stop paying a tax. Legally.

The Internal Revenue Service is giving a rebate this year on a telephone war tax. This is one of those line items at the bottom of your phone bill. The tax was instituted in 1898 to help the United States pay for the Spanish-American War. Individuals and businesses have one chance to obtain a refund on this telephone war tax, by asking for it in their 2006 income tax returns.

Remarkably, the Internal Revenue Service has made it easy to request the refund, yet IRS Commissioner Mark Everson says that many taxpayers are overlooking it. Obtaining the refund is easy. But first, a little history.

The Spanish-American War lasted from April to August of 1898 and was predicated on a U.S. government demand that Spain abandon its colony in Cuba, which the U.S. subsequently occupied. By the end of 1898, the United States had also taken over the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico.

The war was also used as an official pretext to take over Hawaii. The Senate debated over the annexation in secret, some arguing for total annexation, others for just Pearl Harbor. Sen. Richard Pettigrew of South Dakota derided the annexation plan as money "thrown away in the interest of a few sugar planters and adventurers in Hawaii." Military bases and raw materials -- sound familiar?

The telephone tax was instituted as part of the War Revenue Bill, which expanded the government's ability to collect taxes, ostensibly to pay for the war. As with the myriad controversial "pork" items added to the recent Iraq war funding authorization, the 1898 bill was the subject of scores of amendments that benefited big business. These included tax breaks for powerful industries like the insurance companies and tobacco dealers.

The telephone tax of 1 cent per call targeted the wealthy, who were generally the only ones who had telephone access in 1898. After the war, the tax was eventually raised to 3 percent. Since the Vietnam War, it has been the target of war tax resisters, people who refuse to pay taxes because they do not want to fund war.

Tax resistance has a long history. Henry David Thoreau promoted it in his essay "Civil Disobedience" to fight slavery: "If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood."

The IRS has vigorously targeted full-fledged tax resisters -- ranging from those refusing to pay the Pentagon's percentage of their taxes, to those who outright refuse to pay anything to the government -- making an example of them by garnishing wages, sending them to prison for tax evasion and confiscating their homes.

Tax resisters figured out that they could protest the telephone tax simply by writing their checks to the phone company, withholding the amount of the tax. The IRS deemed the collection of the tax too expensive, relative to the small amount of the tax itself.

According to the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee, early collection efforts by the IRS included the auctioning of Jim Glock's bicycle for $22 in 1973 and of George and Lillian Willoughby's VW Bug in 1971 for $123 (in 2004, Lillian, at 89, with the support of her husband, George, 94, was jailed for protesting the Iraq war).

Court losses convinced the IRS to dump the telephone war tax in 2006 and to offer the retroactive rebate for phone taxes paid between March 1, 2003, and July 31, 2006. Typical refunds will be between $30 and $60. Ironically, while the IRS has dropped the tax on long-distance and "bundled" services, like high-speed Internet, the tax remains for older, standard local phone services and rental of equipment that enables the disabled to use phones.

Thus, this tax on the rich is now a tax on the poor. Congressman John Lewis, D-Ga., has submitted a bill to permanently wipe this remnant clean. Two-thirds of the bill's co-sponsors are anti-tax Republicans, so Democrats might be leery about passing it.

The website, www.refundsforgood.org, lists step-by-step instructions on how to recoup the telephone tax rebate, and recommends donating it to charity.

While Congress and President Bush trade barbs over war funding, with a simple check mark on your tax return you can help to defund the war. Claim your telephone tax rebate. Let the Pentagon hold a bake sale.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war in iraq, taxes

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Specific Tax Resistence
Posted by: Lector on Apr 6, 2007 12:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Refusing to pay telephone taxes was a safe way to resist but it takes more courage to refuse to pay at all and or redirect it to a charity that needs it (before the government gets its hands on it). I'm not sure what happens then. Jail?

One good argument for tax resistance is that we have an illegitimate President and, therefore in my view, an illegitimate government. By supporting this government’s involvement in the Iraq war, directly or indirectly, we are participating in their “sins”.

In 1968 there were 448 writers and editors who put a full-page ad in the New York Post declaring their intention to refuse to pay taxes for the Vietnam War. The signatories included Susan Sontag, Norman Mailer, Muriel Rukeyser, Thomas Pynchon, Jane Jacobs, Benjamin Spock, Betty Friedan, William Styron, Stanley Elkin, James Baldwin, Terry Southern, Dwight Macdonald, Henry Miller, Nelson Algren, James Leo Herlihy, Sally Belfrage, and Eric Bentley. How many are willing to do this today?

Robert R. Lightfoot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Specific Tax Resistence Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Radicals today lack courage Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: adicals today lack courage Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» Tax paying is a volunteer system... Posted by: common intelligence
Easter Seal society
Posted by: brotherjonah on Apr 6, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also DAV and Paralyzed Veterans of America, the M.S. Society, just as a start.

I get literally tons of re-useable medical equipment, through recycling. I donate it to United Way organizations but those four mentioned just for purely personal reasons.

If you want to make a sincere and extreme difference, go to the local recycling yards and buy the crutches, canes, potty chairs, hospital beds, walkers, wheelchairs and anything else similar, then donate it to like Easter Seals. Even broken stuff can be scavenged for parts. The United Way will give you a receipt where you can fill in the blank as to what the dollar value of the goods donated is.

I would suggest going first to an online Medical Equipment retail catalogue and looking at the prices of the stuff New, then value everything at 75% of that price.

The I.R.S. will look for people writing off more than the retail value of New Equipment, even though technically you are selling it to the government at whatever price you want to charge, Free Market Rules and all that crap.

The War is creating and deepening a crisis in long term medical care. More resources than just money are being diverted from all sectors of society (except the very rich)

Emergency care, primary health care. long term care. epidemiology, research, all being diverted to the war effort.

Even pediatrics and Ob/Gyn...

All the while putting more external stress on the system by putting MORE long term patients into the "system" with the single most preventable cause of injury and death, deliberate violent action. By putting medical supplies back into service, expensive supplies, you are providing a service the Government is refusing to provide. Cuts in Medicaid, Medicare, CHAMPUS and VA benefits are real, and they really hurt. And you choke off the money earmarked for first deconstructing and then reconstructing foreign countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brilliant idea, Amy. Now here's another way of ending Bush’s war of choice
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 7, 2007 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since most Americans are opposed to an arbitrary withdrawal date, but want the Iraq occupation ended, Congress should give George W. LESS money that he's asking for -- $60 billion, for example -- with no strings attached. If he vetoed the bill, Congress would override it by public demand.

Since $60 billion would run out by year's end, Shrub would have to ask Congress for more money before December. If, by then, his troop surge plan was working, Congress would provide the additional funding, again by public demand.

Conservely, if the troop surge had failed, a more likely scenario, Dub-ya would be the only politician in Washington opposed to an immediate withdrawal. Not even his dog, Barnie, and Laura would support him.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something you can do, safely?
Posted by: Knowmad on Apr 7, 2007 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't for a minute blame the average American if they're afraid of what might happen to them and their family if they were to speak out against the administration, or - god forbid - withhold taxes which are needed to sustain the march of global tyranny. Your corrupt fools-in-control are simply too far gone to be trusted, and must be treated as one would the criminally insane. Perhaps you can at least take advantage of this legal means to withhold blood money.

As for such 'intellectuals' as the ridiculous conservasaurus, albrechtkrausse, bobsays and the like that pop up here whenever they sense an opportunity to spread chushrovian nonsense: either laugh and ignore, or both, as they've been totally turned, and won't be swayed by anything resembling logic, reason or common sense. Like insecure children, they're only interested in stirring the pot in order to attract attention - it's like their version of glamour and fame - and wouldn't recognise an act of courage and compassion if it fell out of their guncase. These propaganist bullies are commonplace in systems such as yours has become, as it allows them a soapbox from which they can gleefully howl disdain at: "All dem leftie, librul, pinko, commie, pergressif basturds. Gawd bless 'merica! An gawd bless Gorge Dubya Bush!" (actual quote from one of these 'patriots' at a news report regarding Cindy Schiavo's brave stand).

Sorry about the rant fellow progressives, but these unaware dolts can distract from the real and important discussions that are needed if your ravaged republic is to survive this onslaught of senseless depravity. Watch how they treat me now - they'll be all affronted, but look behind the words. Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Something you can do, safely? Posted by: peacefullaim
» Ignoring is bliss, for us Posted by: Knowmad
about the income tax
Posted by: traynor on Apr 7, 2007 8:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the Federal Income Tax goes to pay interest on the debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» what nonsense! Posted by: EconProf
Why are any of you paying income tax?
Posted by: Jonnieprince on Apr 8, 2007 1:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After watching 'Freedom to Fascism' I don't understand why anyone in the US is paying federal income tax at all - watch it free on youtube.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what nonsense!
Posted by: EconProf on Apr 8, 2007 2:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 2006 Federal Government fiscal year net interest was $226.6B while total Federal receipts were $2407.3B (see table B-80 of the 2007 Economic Report of the President. That is, interest was less that 10% of receipts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what nonsense! Posted by: Obijuan
» wrong again! Posted by: EconProf
War Tax and the Military
Posted by: boing007 on Apr 8, 2007 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let the Pentagon hold a bake sale.
And go door to door, cap in hand, across this great land.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

small change.
Posted by: sdoboze on Apr 8, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
phone tax? what is it, equal to the cost of one MRE per year? After production, changing hands, shipping and overhead.
The corporation I.R.S., is now relenting and not fighting those who choose to get a 'refund' of this small amount.
It's a chip; the bone thrown to a dog.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: small change. Posted by: ALANHESTER
Resistance/Rebellion
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Apr 8, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone seriously interested in a perfectly legal rebellion, look into The Lincoln Initiative. Our votes can change our government. They just can't change it in an election.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gone For Good: The Economic Boom of the Clinton Years
Posted by: sofla100 on Apr 8, 2007 1:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, a Republican President has bought us war. America, engaged in it's overseas wars, and along with that, the price of oil trading for $60-$70 a barrel on up, adds up to a diminishing economy for America and the world. Gone for good, the economic boom of the Clinton years. Gone for good, a time when most anybody could take a few thousand bucks, get into the stock market, and turn it into millions - as many did. What has this President given us? Nothing but grief! Now, we are asked to pay increasingly larger percentages for war and "defense." And, for what. All it seems to do is make the world less safer. Meanwhile, services for the people get cut and trimmed back. Millions go without health care and basic necessities. What GW Bush has given us, nothing but grief!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tax paying is a volunteer system...
Posted by: common intelligence on Apr 8, 2007 10:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as written. Lest ye continue to be the fool, simply stop volunteering to pay.

The language of corruption in the US "system" has been volunteerally accepted for so long out of shear ignorance of the masses, the legal system doesn't even know the truth, and therefore follows the statis quo of continuing the deceptive accepatance of the illusion as truth.
100's of thousands don't participate in the taxation intimidation any more because the have woken up by doing their home work as active citizens.
But for the ignorant masses and increaing numbers of immigrantsthe don't know what the truth is they will continue accepting and blindly following suit in the deception, perpetuating a false understanding.
New and young generations too follow as their ignorant parents have done because they never bother to wonder if they haven't been just blindly accepting the fear instilled by the almighty IRS.
You see it's not what "they" say in their Tax payers Guide that is as important as what the don't tell you.

So read the "guide" and don't write in that you have 99 dependants, because that is breaking the law to lie.

Just fill in Your w-4 with "Exempt" because you as wage earners are Exempt. Because wages are not "income". Profit is income! As most people do not "profit" from wages. Wages are a trade or your "life's time" which is not profit. That is why we are all "hired" as "work for hire". BUT if you get "Profit sharing" from your employer that is taxable!. But not you wages. After all your life's time is always disepating and never increases therefore wages from "work for hire" is like debt that can not be refunded to you. Debt does not denote profit! Otherwise you'd all have to pay taxes for the spending money you don't have by using you credit cards to fill in the void for money you don't have.

Isn't it curious that the governmenrt will let you pay you taxes by Charging them on your credit card?
This country is firgin nuts!

This is only a little info. You have to understand the system before you can feel free to use it. STUDY!

(But then you are all too "busy" to take your lives into your own hands. So most of you place you life in the hands of the government to guide you and enslave you, instead of freeing yourselves.)

Funny how it says on all of the Federal Reserve Notes,"
In god we trust"!
It doesn't say in government we trust!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement