Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Evidence Is There: It’s Time for Congress to Investigate the Ties Between the Bush Family and Osama bin Laden

By Lucy Komisar, IPS News. Posted April 5, 2007.


How the Bush family's private connection to a dirty offshore bank is the only link between Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

Sleeping Around Craigslist
Anna Reed, Lily Penza, East Bay Express

Bush's Secret Army of Snoops and Snitches
Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive

Michael Pollan on What's Wrong with Environmentalism
Kate Cheney Davidson, Yale Environment 360

A Peak Oil Prophet Imagines Life in America After Wal-Mart
Michelle Nijhuis, Grist.org

Sci-Fi Heroes Take on the System
Roya Rastegar, ColorLines

Billionaires Are Gouging Your Grandparents
Brave New Films, Brave New Films

Online Activists Keep the Pressure on Obama
Ari Melber, TheNation.com

More stories by Lucy Komisar

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The following is taken from a chapter, "The BCCI Game: Banking on America, Banking on Jihad," by investigative journalist Lucy Komisar in the new book "A Game as Old as Empire," just published by Berrett-Koehler (San Francisco).

Now that the U.S. Congress is investigating the truth of President George W. Bush's statements about the Iraq war, they might look into one of his most startling assertions: that there was a link between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden.

Critics dismissed that as an invention. They were wrong. There was a link, but not the one Bush was selling. The link between Hussein and Bin Laden was their banker, BCCI. But the link went beyond the dictator and the jihadist -- it passed through Saudi Arabia and stretched all the way to George W. Bush and his father.

BCCI was the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, a dirty offshore bank that then-President Ronald Reagan's Central Intelligence Agency used to run guns to Hussein, finance Osama bin Laden, move money in the illegal Iran-Contra operation and carry out other "agency" black ops. The Bushes also benefited privately; one of the bank's largest Saudi investors helped bail out George W. Bush's troubled oil investments.

BCCI was founded in 1972 by a Pakistani banker, Agha Hasan Abedi, with the support of Sheik Zayed bin Sultan al Nahyan, ruler of Abu Dhabi and head of the United Arab Emirates. Its corporate strategy was money laundering. It became the banker for drug and arms traffickers, corrupt officials, financial fraudsters, dictators and terrorists.

The CIA used BCCI Islamabad and other branches in Pakistan to funnel some of the $2 billion that Washington sent to Osama bin Laden's Mujahadeen to help fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. It moved the cash the Pakistani military and government officials skimmed from U.S. aid to the Mujahadeen. It also moved money as required by the Saudi intelligence services.

The BCCI operation gave Osama bin Laden an education in offshore black finance, which he would put to use when he organized the jihad against the United States. He would move money through the Al-Taqwa Bank, operating in offshore Nassau and Switzerland with two Osama siblings as shareholders.

At the same time, BCCI helped Saddam Hussein, funneling millions of dollars to the Atlanta branch of the Italian government-owned Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL), Baghdad's U.S. banker, so that from 1985 to 1989 it could make $4 billion in secret loans to Iraq to help it buy arms.

U.S. congressman Henry Gonzalez held a hearing on BNL in 1992 during which he quoted from a confidential CIA document that said the agency had long been aware that the bank's headquarters was involved in the U.S. branch's Iraqi loans.

Kickbacks from 15 percent commissions on BNL-sponsored loans were channeled into bank accounts held for Iraqi leaders via BCCI offices in the Caymans as well as in offshore Luxembourg and Switzerland. BNL was a client of Kissinger Associates, and Henry Kissinger was on the bank's international advisory board, along with Brent Scowcroft, who would become George Bush Sr.'s national security advisor. That connection makes the Bush administration's surprise and indignation at "oil for food" payoffs in Iraq seem disingenuous.

Important Saudis were influential in the bank. Sheik Kamal Adham, brother-in-law of the late Saudi King Faisal, head of Saudi intelligence from 1963 to 1979, and the CIA's liaison in the area, became one of BCCI's largest shareholders. George Bush Sr. knew Adham from his time running the CIA in 1975.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bcci, bin laden, bush

Lucy Komisar is a New York-based journalist and author of "A Game as Old as Empire," published by Berrett-Koehler (San Francisco).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Just 1 question
Posted by: cordas on Apr 5, 2007 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When did the Mujahadine belong to or opperate at the orders of Osama Bin Laden?

I know Osama had a military force opperating in Afganistan, but as far as I was aware it wasn't even part of the "officail" Mujahadine, let alone running the show.

We can't nail these liars when we use miss-infomation ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just 1 question Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Just 1 question Posted by: cordas
» RE: Just 1 question Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Just 1 question Posted by: davincispb
Pogo's Right Again
Posted by: jim_altman on Apr 5, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An often quoted line from the old "Pogo" comic strip is, "We have met the enemy and he is us." True again! Realpolitik diplomacy has produced some real nasty bastards and we did it, mostly all by ourselves. What's amazing about this story is that anyone with an ounce of interest could find all this information in an hour's time in just about any public library. We can't blame the media for this lapse. It's what so many have called our national amnesia that allows us to play the true favorite American pastime, DENIAL. Give us a better stereo and a little extra sound-proofing in our economy car and an extra week at Disney and we'll deny anything ever happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Web of finance
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Apr 5, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BCCI was involved in complex business dealings and while not originally intended to become the dark side of money movement, it indeed did become that.

but as usual the author is stretching some "facts" and making many "assumptions" to try to say Bush and Osama were best bud's

Here is some info omitted from the article which could in fact suggest Clinton, or Carter for that matter were closer to Osama!

Carter - BCCI created with capital from Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahayan, emir of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, Bank of America (25%) and, allegedly, the CIA. It is claimed that the CIA were seeking a funding route for the Afghan Mujahideen (CARTER ADSMINISTRATION) , similar to the Investors Overseas Service and the Nugan Hand Bank in the 1970s.

Senators John Kerry and Hank Brown co-authored a report on BCCI - it found that former Defense Secretary Clark Clifford (worked for Carter, johnson etc..etc..) and his business partner Robert A. Altman had been closely involved with the bank from 1978, when they were introduced to BCCI by Bert Lance


WHO IS BERT LANCE

Lance was a close adviser and friend to candidate for President Jimmy Carter, during Carter's successful 1976 campaign. After Carter's victory, Lance was named director of the Office of Management and the Budget (OMB).

Press reports have established that Lance was at least peripherally involved in the BCCI scandal of the 1980s and early 1990s. He was in any case involved in deals with notable BCCI luminaries such as Agha Hasan Abedi, Mochtar Riady and Ghaith Pharaon and P. S. Prasad, and joined with Arkansas-based power investor Jackson Stephens in facilitating BCCI's takeover of Financial General Bankshares. An article by Mike McAlary in the New York Post asserted that Lance and Stephens made millions in the wake of BCCI's collapse.


Clinton - The Abu Nidal link man for the BCCI accounts was an Arab based in Iraq named Samir Najmeddin or Najmedeen. Throughout the 80s, BCCI had set up millions of dollars worth of letters of credit for Najmeddin, largely for arms deals with Iraq. Qassem later swore in an affidavit that Najmeddin was often accompanied by an American, whom Qassem subsequently identified as the financier Marc Rich. Rich was later indicted in the U.S. for tax evasion and racketeering in an apparently unrelated case, fled the country, and received a controversial pardon from Bill Clinton on January 20, 2001.

Now..consider Sandy Bergers covert mission in destroying classified documents relating to 9-11 combined with Rich's pardon and a picture begins to emerge..

what that picture is may be as cloudy as the one the author is trying to paint re Bush's connection to Bin Laden but I think this is a bit clearer one!

There is alot untold regarding behind closed doors dealings in the international community and Carter and Clinton were thick in it - more so than Bush I suspect!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: Zipadeduda
» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: bambic
» RE: The Web of finance,Conservasaurus viewpoint. Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: The Web of finance Posted by: davincispb
THE WOMAN CERTAINLY DID HER HOMEWORK
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 5, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been reading about the bush- bid laden connection for a long time. Every time it surfaces it gets buried. Maybe not this time. The two families go back many years. I don't believe that the bush family ever made an honest dollar. Even the grandfather was sleazy. I look forward to reading the book. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BBC - THE WAR ON TERROR IS A FAKE CIA CREATION - WAKE UP!!
Posted by: BillDouglas on Apr 5, 2007 7:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bin Laden 9/11 Confession IS FAKE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41UAnkQARFs

Al Qaeda is a CIA Creation:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/
october2006/061006alqaedacrap.htm
[Be sure to paste BOTH parts of above url in browser]

The fact is that 90 PLUS SENIOR MILITARY, INTELLIGENCE, LAW ENFORCEMENT AND GOVT. OFFICIALS, PLUS 120 PROFESSORS CHALLENGE THE OFFICIAL 9/11 STORY.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Why has the Washington Post not asked the BBC WHO told the BBC that WTC #7 would collapse 23 MINUTES BEFORE IT DID?

See below BBC report of 9/11/2001.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqqhX8gkhE0

WHY WON'T THE BBC TELL US WHO TOLD THEM OF THE COLLAPSE 23 MINUTES BEFORE IT HAPPENED?

THE 9/11 COMMISSION SAID THE COLLAPSE OF WTC #7 WAS COMPLETELY UNEXPECTED.

UNTIL 9/11 NO STEEL REINFORCED SKY-SCRAPER HAD EVERY COLLAPSED DUE TO FIRE OR EXTERNAL DAMAGE.

Learn more about molten steel in WTC towers & building 7 rubble, when jet fuel and building fires CAN NOT burn hot enough to melt steel.

See: 9/11 Mysteries, documentary
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since 9/11 was an inside job, who cares about Bin Laden?
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 5, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My participation in AlterNet's Rosie O'Donnell/9/11 conspiracy "discussion" yesterday left me completely bummed out.

If 9/11 was a government conspiracy as 70 million Americans apparently think, most of them AlterNet bloggers, then Osama Bin Laden is a fall guy which means any future discussion about him on AlterNet would be meaningless. The same applies to Iraq and other 9/11-related issues.

It's also clear to me the last three years I spent publicizing the bogus Bush bio I found on a State Department website and reported to the Boston Globe was a total waste of my time. I should have talked about UFOs, which, not coincidentally, the same number of Americans (70 million) believe in as well, according to a poll in USA Today.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption. But then, who gives a shit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the link between bush and bin Laden is no big deal.
Posted by: kellysgarden on Apr 5, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What IS a big deal is that Osama was the pre-chosen patsy for the pre-planned attacks of 9/11, in which Cheney and Bush are complicit. The pre-planned oil wars in Afghanistan and Iraq needed the bin Laden connection as pretext. Impeach Cheney/Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In the area of New Jersey across from the WTC,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Apr 5, 2007 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it is an accepted fact that BinLadden children were flown out of Newark Airport right after the Trade Center went down-when no one else was allowed in the air. It is also known that Bush 1 was having breakfast with BinLadden's father that morning. There are several books that point out the close ties between the Bushits and the BinLaddens. Also both have evil sons. Why don't you try reading one, Conservasaurushit?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who gives a shit, indeed
Posted by: motamanx on Apr 5, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who gives a shit? One asks.
Apparently not enough people to initiate the kind of scrutiny of this administration's illegal activities which have been kept hidden for six years, by hook and by crook (Cheney).
We know it's all about the oil. Why doesn't someone with real clout come out and say so?
Colin Powell comes to mind.
The war will continue until Exxon has its leases in place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who gives a shit, indeed Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Who gives a shit, indeed Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: legalities Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: legalities Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Colin Powell did their bidding Posted by: oregoncharles
Osama Kimosabi
Posted by: rwmk12 on Apr 5, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Osama where are you? Mysteriously you show up on video every once and a while to scare the American public again, into complying with the bush admin's agendas. You worked with the cia before. You have close ties with bush and saudi royal family. The whole of the Western world was after you, but yet you continually escape. You are a ghost. A boogeyman. A face to put to terror. You are an archetype of the omnipresent potential for terrorist attack. You are the perpetual enemy of Orwell's perpetual war. The question is. Do you still work for the CIA? Or are you intentionally not captured? Why won't the major news media play your messages in their entirety? CNN has 24 hours everyday. Same goes for other villians... just a flash... just a flicker... of terror... of ghosts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Osama Kimosabi Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Osama Kimosabi Posted by: sea4th
Why didn't Dems manage to taint W as a failed businessman?
Posted by: counterpoint on Apr 5, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To this day I can't understand why a dyslexic C student with a huge drinking problem who was an utter failure as an oil business man and only stayed afloat because of repeated bailouts by shady family friends was able to run a campaign that swept him into the White House. Why wasn't the mantra of the Dems: "Don't vote for an incompetent loser?" Rove and the Swiftboaters managed to kill Kerry with lies, why couldn't Dems kill Bush with facts? (Or perhaps these facts all came out way late, I don't remember).
(Side note: it's worth keeping in mind that Bush 41 was once the US spy chief. If J Edgar Hoover managed to blackmail legions of politicians with compromising intelligence (a proven fact) who can tell which benefits Bush 41 got out of his brief tenure.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the nature of stooges Posted by: ScottP
» How about now -- Congressional Dems investigate? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
David H
Posted by: davidheckadon on Apr 5, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in February I came across a story in the Pakistani newspaper "The Dawn" that Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law had been murdered in Madagascar in what appeared to be a burglary.
See: http://www.dawn.com/2007/02/01/int8.htm

In March, the British newspaper "The Guardian" ran a more detailed story that stated that Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law was once Osama's closest friend, and that he played a "controversial" role in the arrest of the gang that attempted to blow up the World Trade Centre in 1993. In addition, after the September 11, 2001 attacks, Osama's brother-in-law had been arrested by the Saudis and was prevented from leaving Saudi Arabia for several years.

But my favorite part of the British newspaper article was that Osama's brother-in-law : He was "arrested in California in 1995, and found to have terror training manuals and contact books listing telephone numbers for Bin Laden in his luggage."

See: http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,,2024731,00.html

So here's my question. WHY do we hear virtually nothing about this story in the US media? Osama's own brother-in-law was once arrested in California with terror training manuals and Osama's phone number, and the only way I found this out was by reading British and Pakistani newspapers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: David H Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: David H Posted by: gary_7vn
Offshore Banks and Hygiene
Posted by: ZPaul on Apr 5, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(RE: "...a dirty offshore bank...") Excuse me, er, you all may think this is a dumb question, but....is there such a thing as a "clean" offshore bank? And if so, why is it "offshore" to begin with?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Offshore Banks and Hygiene Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Offshore Banks and Hygiene Posted by: albrechtkrausse
the countdown
Posted by: pacto on Apr 5, 2007 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
well, My Fellow Americans, It would seem you don`t have any idea whats in store for you. Don`t you see the out come of all of this? first lets be clear this is not a joke ,this is a carefully excuted plan to get and keep the power,.....forever....The next step is to get the mass of people to start demostrations so they can call out martial law and the country is locked down and in complete submissiveness to Lord Bush.You will give a shit when you find yourselves living in a world of total and utter dominance by the new world order like the slaves of our past without recourse and without hope. To prevent this somber prediction,actions should have been taken years ago,attention should have been toward electing people to such power, but the country was asleep at the wheel,groveling in easy credit,slowly letting go of any serious observations about who and with what agenda was being offered up as leadership.Now the World is not only being destroyed but the people who care are being ridiculed and the target of late night comedy, to keep you laffin and shuckin so you won`t notice until it all falls down

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now I get it -- BCCI is why Bin Laden is still FREE!
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 5, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True or not, BCCI is a diversion, just like 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Our REAL enemy is the "Project for a New American Century" (PNAC) -- a neocon front organization that presents the greatest threat to individual liberty in U.S. history.

Focus on PNAC and everything else will fall into place, including the treasonous connection between Bushies and the Saudis.

For a list of 225 PNAC members, including rightwing Democrats in liberal clothing -- i.e. Madeline Albright-- visit my website, King-George.biz -- the only one with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

God Bless America, Hugh E. Scott.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The WAKE-UP call. Don't hit the snooze button!!!!!
Posted by: Darrell Kern on Apr 5, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly most Americans are very confused because of all the conspiracy theorists using the same media sensationalization tactics- selling 9/11 merchandise, DVD's, Books and more- making a cheap buck of the backs of dead innocent American citizens- and this plays right into the hands of the enemy.

Crazy zealots like David Icke, Jordan Maxwell, Alex Jones and the many others like them who are making millions on their websites- off the backs of dead innocents.

This is why conservatives, republicans, and far right-wingers and religious zealots are debunking the UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH.

That fact remains that this is not a conspiracy at all. It is complete and total truth- which has turned into a mudslinging event- that the right-wing always wins- and this is why liberals are considered to be so damn stupid. Which we are considering all the shit that has been used to dupe us.

IT NEVER SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN THIS FAR!!!!! EVER!!!!

They (the 20% of world OWNERS- yes that is exactly what I said) have been doing this since probably before the 18th Century.

Now that this is all known (actually it always has been) and the facts are coming to the fore-

Oh well, its a little late to be bugging around with inconsequential details- which is the main plan. While we run around digging up facts- they are busy with their agenda of world domination and the ultimate destruction of the human race. They have always been- and likely will continue to be hundreds of steps ahead- because we keep searching through the rubble looking for clues!!!

They continue to laugh all the way to the bank.

WE ARE A FUCKING JOKE TO THEM.

What is worse is Both sides are players in this charade. Clinton, Carter, Regan, Bush.... They are all the same and they are all on the same team! HELLO?????

We deserve this- we really do.

I for one hope that either we rise up and take charge or hope they blow it all up. Either way I am so tired. It doesn't even matter if I am right all the time. I have been saying this since 1985 (I am 42 now), and people just say- oh there is poor crazy Darrell talking nonesense again!

The trap is materialism. Lots of distractions. Very effective.

I do feel good inside knowing I saw through all this bullshit and in the end I will not die decieved. I like many will be shunned and probably shot because I will refuse to be micro-chipped and all the other bullshit that IS headed our way.

In fact, I expect a knock on the door any day now. Within two years time I will likely be dead or in a concentration camp or prison. Within 10 years everybody will be- at least the unlucky and duped 80%.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't go there! You're not going to like what you find!
Posted by: xbj on Apr 5, 2007 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You might just wake up in a Nazi country with an insane fuhrer and not a President like the rest of us...

Better to turn on Idol and sleep... sleeeeppp.... poppies will make you sleeeeeeeepppp.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9/11 conspiracy theories are counterproductive.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 5, 2007 12:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By promoting 9/11 conspiracy theories, believers play into the hands of neocons.

Why? Because the believers lose crediblity in the eyes of 200 million American NON-believers.

Believers should focus instead on our REAL enemy -- PNAC -- which will reveal the Bush-Saudi connection and other treasonous transgressions.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A course of "high crimes and misdemeanors."
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Apr 5, 2007 12:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Lucy Komisar . . .

I cannot thank you enough for sharing this information. I have long thought that the Bush family beds with friends and then decides they are foe. As I read the comments of a naysayer or two, I marvel as I have for years. Why is it that Congress and citizens alike do not accept that this President's legacy is a course of "high crimes and misdemeanors."

There are so many illegal incidents. This Administration reeks of crime. I wonder why we continue to wait to impeach a corrupt Administration. I invite you to review a few of my thoughts. Please comment; tell me what you think. Teach me! Help me to understand.
Resigning. Bush, Cheney, Gonzales . . .
Kucinich Calls for Censure, Conversation, and Change
America's Angst. FBI Report and Patriot Act

Lucy Komisar I am grateful that someone is thoroughly documenting what I have read in bits and pieces. I applaud your endeavor. I look forward to more.

Betsy L. Angert
BeThink.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The facts are in! impeach. Posted by: Betsy L. Angert
The Bush family has deep roots!
Posted by: nesNYC on Apr 5, 2007 1:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Bin Laden" connection is only a recent relationship with criminals the Bush family is notorious for. In other words, nothing new here.

As many of us are aware, Prescott Bush helped the rise of the Third Reich only to profit from their eventual demise then go on to set up the precursor to the CIA with help of former Nazi SS. The problem isn't who the Bushies deal with, it's the ruling elite that empowered the Bushies in the first place. Dynastic families like the Morgans and the Rockefellers ARE the people who own the MIC (military industrial complex) and the source of our agony.

To read more about suppressed American history you should start here:

Former Federal Prosecutor John Loftus confirms the Bush-Nazi scandal

Google...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fractional reserve banking as economic parasitism
Posted by: vzn on Apr 5, 2007 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
learn about the real hidden power of money manipulation,
what they dont teach you in school

a paper I wrote called "fractional reserve banking as economic
parasitism".. partly on the art/science/mathematics of economic warfare.

endorsed by two phd economists. printed in nexus
magazine, 60k world circulation. #1 top downloaded
economics paper. used by economics
teacher in australia as standard classroom material.

more info on request.

"fractional reserve banking as economic parasitism"

http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/wpawuwpma/0203005.htm



recent supporting material: "confessions of an economic hit man"

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, duh!
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Apr 5, 2007 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't the cutesy little nickname,"Bandar Bush" give anyone a clue that things between George and the Movers and Shakers of the Islamic world might be a little cozier than he'd like us to know? Has anyone ever done any cursory background reading on the Carlyle Group? This unique frat's sole criterion for acceptance is mega-money; where it comes from or where it may go is irrelevant (and in some cases, highly interesting.) In addition, does anyone doubt that Osama is worth more to George alive than dead, and perhaps that's why, in fact, he is not dead? Have you noticed that every time he makes another video, George's approval rating sputters out of the toilet? In the geopolitical card trick that the "Global War On Terror" actually is, bin Laden is analagous to the ace up his sleeve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow Alternet is practicing mass censorship
Posted by: Freedom84 on Apr 5, 2007 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was going to comment on the Rosie 9/11 story and suddenly realize that they closed the ability to comment on the story, what happened guys were you strongarmed by the Bush Administration? Did thoese Nazi's want a discourse on the truth taking from any form of media including the internet, I just find it coincidental that it was closed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Off course they are connected
Posted by: Freedom84 on Apr 5, 2007 3:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bin Ladens, are the Saudi equivalent of the Bush family rich bastards who live and breath oil and will do anything for riches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

911 COVER-UP WARS = DEMOCRACY MISSING IN ACTION
Posted by: Hal on Apr 5, 2007 6:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Western stooge and evil genius Osama bin Laden was a known CIA asset as recently as the summer of 2000 in Dubai . Hard copy evidence of OBL’s status as CIA asset “Tim Osman” is here .

On that score – one last meme in response to those here that say the 911 issue is a mere “distraction”…

A cover-up @ 911 remains the all-purpose lynchpin still used to foist together sham, blood money “war on terror” from the U.S. and Eurasia to the Mid East theatres.

In other words, 911 cover-up and ersatz “war on terror” are inseparable. They ARE ONE AND THE SAME THING. This is something limited hangout “experts” Chomsky and “Blowback” Chalmers Johnson, etc, (often cited at Alternet) have never come clean on.

And unlike a DC conspiracy fantasy – the case for 911 cover-up is well made. That case is NOT the one for a 911 “inside job” although suspicions for such are well founded in a track record I’ve posted on the Rosie O’Donnell thread.

A proven cover-up is something the faux “left” media have less than no answer or fallback for. And to make the claim that rank and file Americans have the burden of proof for an “inside job” at DC when an entire Washington-MSM complex defends a vast 911 cover-up is a grotesque sham.

A criminal and proven 911 COVER-UP has vast ramifications at home including democracy missing in action with an entire Washington-MSM circus in the pocket of corporate monopolists. Example: 911 is the single issue GOP 2008 frontrunner insider snake Rudy Giuliani uses for his smarmy one-day status as phony national hero. And that’s just the tip of the cesspool.

A criminal 911 cover-up is the defining event of the new century and easily ranks as one of the most important of the last.

Once Gullible Americans begin to notice the obvious, the cost of doing nothing will become less about denial and more about the restoration of a real democratic republic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More fuel for the King Saud-Bush family connection
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 5, 2007 7:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I'm not a 9/11 conspiracy buff, my reseach of the national calamity revealed the following interesting facts.

Two terrorist hijackers, Khalid Almihdhar and Nawaf Alhazmi, who helped commandeer the Pentagon plane, rented an apartment before 9/11 in San Diego, near the Mexican border. News reports indicate they were assisted by a Saudi civil aviation authority employee. He was also an FBI informant, which raises questions about his true covert role.

Adding to the mystery, the Arabian snitch received funding from charitable contributions by Princess Haifa al-Faisal, wife of Saudi Ambassador to the U.S., Bandar bin Sultan.

Middle East oil conspiracy buffs can take it from there, but this much I believe. Since 9/11, there have been no Al Qaeda sleeper cells in the United States. The big question is WHY NOT since our borders with Mexico are still wide open.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]