Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

On Barack: An Open Letter and Invitation to Thoughtful Brothers and Sisters In America

By Bacardi L. Jackson, BlackProf.com. Posted April 2, 2007.


A widely circulated email among the Black community warns that Black leaders shouldn't demand that Barack Obama's record be scrutinized more closely and meet a higher standard than his white counterparts simply out of jealousy.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Bacardi L. Jackson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This is the text of an open email widely circulated among the Black community online that has prompted a discussion about the standards by which Barack Obama is being held by other Black leaders.

From: Bacardi L. Jackson
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: On Barack: An Open Letter and Invitation to Thoughtful Brothers and Sisters In America

As I and my husband sat watching The State of Black America 2007, presented by Tavis Smiley, we were awe struck, motivated, inspired, filled with pride and edified by the broad ranging views of the impressive collection of black intelligencia represented on the stage. Following each of the richly-crafted commentary from rapper Chuck D to astronaut and engineer Mae Jemison to Professor Cornel West to poet Sonya Sanchez to one of my innovative classmates Omar Wasow (just to name a few), I ooohhed and ahhhed out loud as each broke it down, laid it out and spoke truth to power.

But then it happened ... my enthusiasm came to a screeching halt! Here we go again ... that same gratuitous question mainstream media outlets across America seem to be commissioning ambitious black folk to answer and justify: Is our brother, Barack Obama, down enough with the cause to deserve our support?

I just knew this panel of amazing minds and deep souls would once and for all stop the madness and give a resounding, "we're not falling for another Rove-ian mindtrick to sidetrack us from the substantive issues at hand to debate your historical lies and give credibility to your ignorance." I just knew this conscientious crew would cite to Obama's academic excellence and obvious intelligence, his outstanding achievements, his proven commitment to our community through his life's work, his impressive legislative record, his coalition-building skills and political experience. But instead, Malcolm's proverbial crabs started grabbing, pulling, pinching and reaching for dear brother Barack's neck. I was mortified.

Seeming to come to his aid, one of my longtime heroes, Professor Olgetree, pointed out that Barack, Michelle Obama and others of his students had not only been impressive students at Harvard, but had dedicated their lives and careers to public service. But, (damn it), he added, he can't take our vote for granted.

Then, Brother Cornel (whose audio version of [the book] “Race Matters” I listened to so many times I almost committed chapters to memory) chimed in, not to save Brother Barack, but to highlight his absence from the State of Black America panel to be (how dare he) at some other event to boost his Presidential candidacy when he knew about Tavis' event more than a year ago. While Professor West did mention that his questions about the depths of one's love for the people were relevant for all candidates everywhere, they, unfortunately, were explicitly asked only of Obama.

Finally, our fearless leader and host, Tavis, who, by his own admission, knew Barack before he was "Barack Obama" sealed the tomb. He assured the audience that, the night before, he got a call from an apologetic Barack who was unable to attend, but "really wanted to be here." As if completely cued in by the tone in Brother Tavis' statement, the audience gave a loud and unambiguously sarcastic "Aaawwww." Adding salt to the wound, dear friend Tavis responded, "well, that's what he told me" in that familiar I-know-he-sounds-like-he's-full-of-it-but-I'm-going-to-pretend-to-be-his -brother-anyway delivery.

Now, I don't point out the dynamics of this dialogue to take away from the amazing legacies of Brothers Ogletree, West or Smiley. They've all made important and lasting contributions to our community and will likely continue to do so, but I do question why they, and we as a community, tend to be so uncharitable toward our own, but inexplicably benevolent to others.

For example, how does a white man who signed the deeply disparate crack-cocaine bill into law, introduced a devastating crime bill that further entrenched the prison industrial complex at the expense of black communities and black political power everywhere, oversaw the murder of more people on death row during his presidency than any president in the history of our country, completely dissed and dismissed our sister Lani Guinier, who would have been an amazing Attorney General for our country and for our community, purely for the sake of political expediency, get to be donned the "First Black President"?

Is our loyalty so easily spawned because one acts like a "pimp," plays the saxophone and visits a few pulpits? I am absolutely amazed at the absence of critical black analysis about Clinton's performance in office while Brother Barack has to be hyper-analyzed, criticized and have his thumbnails extricated for DNA samples before we'll believe he's one of "us." There is no other candidate in this or any other Presidential race (save Shirley Chisholm who, in her day, was hung out to dry by the Black Caucus) who has had to work so hard despite an extraordinary track record to show us that he or she is about the business of making the country better for black people and thereby making the country better for all people.

Al Sharpton, you are absolutely right that everyone who looks like "us" is not one of "us" - at least to the extent that you mean not all black people work for what's in the collective best interest of black people (that is, if such a collective interest still exists - which is another discussion altogether) - but when did you become the blackometer? And, why raise a question of loyalty when you have no substantive evidence of disloyalty? Just to hear yourself talk? Because he's getting more press than you? I'm not suggesting for a minute that Obama and every political candidate not be held accountable for their voting records, their political past, or even their personal judgment, but to question Obama's blackness simply because he is black is the ultimate irony and a dumb distraction, for which Republicans and racists everywhere are cheering us on. And, to question Obama's loyalty simply because he didn't make an appearance at this week's forum hosted by the black gatekeeper flavor of the month is sheer idiocy.

I think a more relevant question is what do the black commentators who make the television and radio appearances to raise and answer the question of Barack's blackness have to gain? It certainly provides them with more face time before the American public and cushions their backsides with a blacker-than-thou throne (even if only in their own minds). I think a more relevant question to our so-called black leaders and academicians is what (other than a supersized ego or potential profits) gets in the way of their unequivocal support of the only person in the race who has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to implementing policies that best serve black people?
To be sure, there may be valid critiques of Obama, but his absence from a forum, his failure to be stereotypically "black" or the fact that he is black are not valid or even useful critiques. So, forgive me for being just a bit skeptical of those black politicians (who reside in key states - e.g., Brother Al and South Carolina State Senator Robert Ford) whose primary critiques are that Barack just may not be black enough or, even better, that America's just not ready for a black President, so they can gain the political spoils and spotlight press of selling out a brother early and often.

If I had the technological saavy, I would jump off this page with all the passion, hope, rage and volume of Spike Lee's Dap and tell you, brothers and sisters everywhere, please please please WAKE UP!

The best thing Barack can do for us is to win, not show up at yet another black forum simply to prove he's one of us by placating the egos who believe Barack should clear his calendar for their "ultimate black" event! There are plenty of other candidates (and so-called leaders) who warrant our scrutiny and skepticism - not to mention a host of misogynistic lyricists, child molesting musicians, and other unaccountable black-community-made millionaires. Barack, however, has proven with his excellence, his achievements, his commitments, and his life's work that he warrants our support.

Rather than using his credentials and connections to build his personal wealth, Obama chose to pursue careers like providing job training for residents of poor neighborhoods, directing voter registration drives and fighting for civil rights. Unlike other candidates in the race, Obama has been consistent in speaking against sending our black babies to murder, and to be murdered by, brown people in the Mesopotamia for the sake of multinational corporate interests. He has successfully forged coalitions with people across racial and political lines to introduce a host of legislation that would, among other things, get guns off our streets, reduce greenhouse emissions, and limit the influence of special interest lobbyist on Capital Hill.

As for whether Barack's black enough, let us not forget that race exists in America not in our biology, genetic code or even our phenotype, but rather by the institutionalization of the economic and social construct of chattel slavery and its vicious offshoots. Under that regime, "a dab'll do ya." Whiteness equates to economic and social privilege and that privilege fades as it traverses the racial spectrum. Anyone who has any black ancestry living in this country, whether for a day or for generations, will experience the vestiges of slavery and the consequences of white privilege, making the question of whether one is descended from enslaved Africans or colonized and oppressed Africans irrelevant. It is not simply the experience of that oppression, however, that demonstrates loyalty to our community and that deserves our community's loyalty, but rather recognition of the injustice of it and actions taken to dismantle it. Clearly, Obama has met this test!

Let the record of each candidate speak for itself. But, for the sake of our ancestors and, more importantly, our descendants, do not inadvertently become a pawn of white privilege by demanding that Obama's record be scrutinized more closely and meet a higher standard than his white counterparts simply because some narcissistic crab in a barrel didn't find himself at the top.


Sincerely,

B.L. Jackson
A Sister Who Unequivocably And Without Apology to Hillary, Bill or Al Supports Barack Obama for President And Invites Other Thoughtful Brothers and Sisters To Do the Same

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, black community

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
If I were black, Obama would probably be most favorable to me.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 2, 2007 4:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I have to place him second to Kucinich. One thing I admire most about black people is they are less likely to vote against their interests than white people. But you gotta wonder with stories like this if they are getting as stupid as us whites.

I loved this part:

"For example, how does a white man who signed the deeply disparate crack-cocaine bill into law, introduced a devastating crime bill that further entrenched the prison industrial complex at the expense of black communities and black political power everywhere, oversaw the murder of more people on death row during his presidency than any president in the history of our country, completely dissed and dismissed our sister Lani Guinier, who would have been an amazing Attorney General for our country and for our community, purely for the sake of political expediency, get to be donned the "First Black President"?

Is our loyalty so easily spawned because one acts like a "pimp," plays the saxophone and visits a few pulpits? I am absolutely amazed at the absence of critical black analysis about Clinton's performance in office while Brother Barack has to be hyper-analyzed, criticized and have his thumbnails extricated for DNA samples before we'll believe he's one of "us."

However you forgot to mention how poorly Jocelyn Elders was treated. She was probably one of the most intelligent and one of the nicest ladies in public service at the time but was tossed aside because she was "politically incorrect."

I hope the black community will apply most of their pressure on Obama not to be too beholding to corporate money. If he refrains from being bought by corporate money, shies away from AIPAC, and does all he can to end the waste of life and resources for war, he might be a fine president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazingly enough blacks are....
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Apr 2, 2007 5:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... their worst enemies sometimes...how else can you explain a black Republican. Now I know that the Democrapic party is FAR from perfect...but what does that make the Republican party?

I guess Obama is not black enough so how does one explain Alan Keyes and Condi as being people who advance the black cause?

Blacks have shown they are no different than the white man once they get their share of wealth.

What we all need is another MLK, but in this day and age I fear that the Roves of the world demonized him beyond recognition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amazingly enough blacks are.... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Amazingly enough blacks are.... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Amazingly enough blacks are.... Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Amazingly enough blacks are.... Posted by: sterlingdave54
We should scrutinise EVERYONE more, not less because someone
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Apr 2, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is black, white, or a mixed-race. These politicans, of any race, should be scrutinised more. Not on silly issues of "he is black" or "is he articulate" but on his past, his record (or lack thereof), his views, his cronys, where his money comes from, etc. The press (and the candidates) like the people to focus on bogus issues (like race, sex, etc) since they are superficial and allow some candidates to not be questioned lest we are 'politically uncorrect'. We should question all of them since most are just corporate lackeys and are supported by the big banks and serve their masters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's with this "If I were black" stuff?
Posted by: silkreed on Apr 2, 2007 6:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackness has nothing to do with Obama's appeal, IMO. I am Anglo-Saxon white and 57, and I've been an Obama fan ever since his keynote address in '04. He has the ability to unite this sadly polarized, mistrustful and generally disfunctional nation simply by inspiring us to be more, to love our country, and by painting a picture of where we want to go. The person at the top gets to set the tone. It's more important to get that right from the start, and be able to communicate it, than to have every detail of policy in place, when you're trying to win votes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Years ago my daughter asked me how in the world did I or
Posted by: mdruss42 on Apr 2, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anyone know for whom to vote. I answered that at our level, i.e. right at poor, one was wise to examine the record and decide under which party the bottom levels of society were better off. Then I added, vote for the women candidates....always. Stupid me, I did not allow for the Kaye Bailey Hutchinson types, or that really rich, and the newly rich sometimes, develope a sense of entitlement that completely separates them from us.

I said all that to say, vote for anyone because he/she is X at your peril.

REMEMBER CLARENCE THOMAS AND NANCY PELOSI.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics:Older and wiser.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Apr 2, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, this year I turn 60. Never thought I would make it nearly this far, but never-the-less, here I am.

It has taken me this many years to learn one profound truth about voting:

it is a waste of time. I have never felt better not voting. I have not voted since 1996.

You want reasons?

One to two percent of the votes in this nation are miscounted or lost.

The list of candidates is proscribed through processes which restrict fair access for all qualified candidates.

The election is winner take all, therefore, deluting ones vote.

As the population grows, the number of representatives has not. Therefore, giving advantage to the money interests.

Raising money has a direct relationship to who is elected. Most of the large and important contibutions come from the plutocracy.

There are other reasons, too.

But, I am happier that I have left the system in which I have no meaningful relationship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Politics:Older and wiser. Posted by: Jerichomorning
macro vs micro
Posted by: rah on Apr 2, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i think some of the observations made in this letter are representative of issues which transcend race... i feel that sharing and celebrating a similar heritage is an important part of individual and community culture-conciousness. however, how do we move culture conciousness to politics? has it been done before?-yes. will it happen again?-hopefully. when culture conciuosness has motivated politics was it running on a single platform? where there issues which many people could identify with despite their race?
i wish it were a trivial issue that obama was black. i wish people black or white held greater importance with the issues growing in our collective american face.
but is there a collective american face? i think many americans regardless of color or class are enculturated to find flaws, to be better, to do better, to compete and enjoy watching competition. i ask myself how i can say these things in without mentioning the unjust history that occurs across our country today. but i really do observe capitalism as the vice which grips, disenfranchises and supports americans. what do we do about that? i think each person makes their attempt at success in light of our captitalist culture, a culture motivates and deconstructs us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama Rebuffs Soros By ELI LAKE
Posted by: rwa on Apr 2, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Staff Reporter of the Sun

Leading Democrats, including Senator Obama of Illinois, are distancing themselves from an essay published this week by one of their party's leading financiers that called for the Democratic Party to "liberate" itself from the influence of the pro-Israel lobby...

At one point in his essay, in a section discussing how the pro- Israel lobby "has been remarkably successful in suppressing criticism," Mr. Soros recalls the fate of Howard Dean's campaign for the presidency. "When Howard Dean called for an evenhanded policy toward Israel in 2004, his chances of getting the nomination were badly damaged...

The chairman of the Dean campaign, Steve Grossman, yesterday respectfully disagreed. "While Howard's public statements about Israel certainly cost him support in the pro- Israel community, I believe his anti-war positions continued to attract a broad cross section of support from the Jewish community"...

Mr. Grossman, a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee and past president of Aipac, said he recognized and respected Mr. Soros' commitment to "progressive American values," and his "investment in political change in America." But Mr. Grossman also said, "I reject out of hand Soros's charges directed toward Aipac."

http://www.nysun.com/article/50846?page_no=1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is the Bomb!
Posted by: Jerichomorning on Apr 2, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope everybody votes for Barack Obama, and that he wins by a landslide! I don't mind that he is not a woman ... he is the best person for the job!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Once a bigot, always a bigot.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 2, 2007 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racists come in all colors, including black.

Being a white male born in Southern California (1935) and raised by liberal parents in Texas where I got the crap beat out of me in grade school because I sounded like a “Yankee,” I know prejudice when I see it. Bacardi Jackson’s rant is no different than the divisive dialog of Jerry Falwell. The operative terms are different, but little else. Once a bigot, always a bigot.

For another opinion about Bacardi’s biased mindset, read an article by Andrew Sullivan at The Daily Dish, dated March 8, 2007.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Once a bigot, always a bigot. Posted by: Conservasaurus
Who were Black people voting for 50 years ago? Now a competnet person isn`t ' black enough'?
Posted by: - Ken on Apr 2, 2007 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remembering Martin Luther King. In his "I Have A Dream" speech, Dr. King said: "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

In this statement, King means ( to me ) that in judging other men, skin color should be ignored - that it should not be a factor in evaluating their competence or moral stature. It follows that skin color should not be a factor in taking actions toward other people. So why does Obama have to ' measure up ' on the ' Blackometer '?

It`s amazing to me, ( as I see it ) that a group that had fought so desperately for inclusiveness, has now become more wanting than ever to polarized themselves.

I`m 57, live in an affluent area of Connecticut and happen to be White, and openly admit that I see the Black issue from the other side of the fence and can never understand what it feels like or means to be a Black person. What I am about to say may be extremely offensive to some, it`s not meant to be, not one iota.

If there is a Black candidate that you feel you can respect his/her political track record and feel they could make a decent president ( I haven`t seen a decent one yet ), then for God`s sake, Get your foot in the door! Perhaps we can get the color issue behind us and the look for the best candidate and ' not judge by the color of their skin but by the content of their character '.

- Ken

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dear Ken, Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Dear Ken, Posted by: - Ken
McCain, Obama, and genocide
Posted by: rwa on Apr 2, 2007 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eli Stephens, Left I on the News

April 1, 2007

More than a half-million Iraqis have died because of the U.S. invasion in March, 2003; another million or so died in the decade before that thanks the U.S./U.K. ("U.N.") sanctions. And in the light of all that, we can still, in this Alice-through the-looking-glass-world we live in, hear this from John McCain: "Failure is genocide." And when asked by Wolf Blitzer to respond to that statement, here's the stone-racist response from Barack Obama:

BLITZER: What if he's right? What if he's right, and what you're proposing and a lot of Democrats are proposing results in genocide in Iraq?

OBAMA: Well, look, what you have right now is chaos in Iraq. After having spent hundreds of billions of dollars, after seeing close to 3,200 lives lost, what you now see is chaos.

That's what Barack Obama thinks has been lost in Iraq - hundreds of billions of dollars, and 3,200 lives. The actual genocide that's taken place in the last 15 years? Sorry, neither he nor McCain nor Wolf Blitzer even acknowledges that that has taken place. The idea simply does not compute in their "the U.S. is a force for good in the world" brains.

http://lefti.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brother President???
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Apr 2, 2007 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
does that mean we have to call Obama "Brother President"??? - BTW, I like him alot- but question the logic of a liberal President in a dangerous time for this country..

The lack of experience is a non issue as far as I'm concerned as for the past 50 years we've had screwed up foreign policy from "experienced" presidents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brother President??? Posted by: - Ken
OMG....OMG... OMG....OMG... OHHHHHHHHhhMyyyyyyGawd....
Posted by: ekipnrut on Apr 2, 2007 5:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sincerely, B.L. Jackson
A Sister Who Unequivocably And Without Apology to Hillary, Bill or Al Supports Barack Obama for President And In- vites Other Thoughtful Brothers and Sisters To Do the Same

But wait!!!
Top Web Results for "unequivocably"
No results found for unequivocably.
OMG...OMG...OMG.... ...Yale Law Class of 98'.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry
Posted by: opeluboy on Apr 2, 2007 7:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would be delighted to vote for Obama, but he stands for virtually nothing. And now he's acting the typical Dem whore for AIPAC as well.

I hope Blacks in this country will vote the issues, not the race. I also hope the women in this country will vote the issues, not the gender. If my hope is realized, neither Obama or Clinton will be president.

I should add I gave up on hope some time ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sorry Posted by: charliemudcat
» RE: Sorry Posted by: opeluboy
» RE: Sorry??? Posted by: Kym525
» RE: Sorry??? Posted by: opeluboy
» RE: Sorry Charlie Posted by: ekipnrut
Extremely Well-Stated!
Posted by: stagolee on Apr 5, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've voiced my exact sentiments and more eloquently than I could have.

Thanks.

I'm looking forward to the day that Black critical analysis flows upward and reaches the mainstream.

Re: your anti-Bill Clinton points, let us not forget his exploitation of Sister Souljah for political capital and his unceremonious dissing of Jocelyn Elders.

The Clinton's don't deserve anything from us. We've given them more than their fair share of our good will, with very little in return.

Well-written, Mrs. Jackson. I'm glad you're out there and I'm glad you were moved to write this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement