Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Will the Right Plumb New Depths and Go After Elizabeth Edwards' Cancer?

By Barbara Ehrenreich, AlterNet. Posted March 30, 2007.


It's bad enough to learn that Elizabeth Edwards' cancer has returned -- now we have to worry about what ugly things the right-wing and mainstream media are saying.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Barbara Ehrenreich

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Ever since John and Elizabeth Edwards revealed that her cancer is back and has taken up residence in her bones, I've lived in fear of what Ann Coulter might have to say about this grim situation.

It's bad enough, for someone like me who's been treated for breast cancer, to hear about anyone else's recurrence, but it's worse when you're worried about a recurrence of Coulter's hoof-in-mouth disease, which led her to suggest, on March 2, that John Edwards is a "faggot." Will she now charge that the Edwards are faking the whole thing -- or that Elizabeth is actually a male transvestite who will be using the alleged cancer as a coverup for his sex-change operation?

It's true, the Edwards' joint announcement of their medical crisis does unfairly highlight the fact that the top three Democratic presidential candidates are all married to their first spouses, while the two top Republicans are serial marry-ers and Newt Gingrich has just paved the way for his own candidacy with a confession of adultery. I see no reason why a divorced person or an adulterer should not be president. But there should be a law against their ever invoking "family values."

Strangely, it's not Coulter, but girl-next-door Katie Couric who's hinted, in a 60 Minutes interview with Elizabeth Edwards, that the couple might be "capitalizing" on the disease. Can't you just see them cackling over the bone scans, eagerly calculating what the results would do for them in the polls? Convening their children for the good news that, although Daddy's been almost eclipsed by Obama, Mommy has a potentially fatal disease?

Couric also told John Edwards that some people might judge him "callous" for campaigning through what might be his wife's last months. Is Couric forgetting that she was working as a $7 million a year NBC anchor while her own husband was dying of colon cancer? And just in case we do get a Gingrich candidacy: Recall that he had his first wife served with divorce papers while she was in the hospital with cancer. In contrast, campaigning with your spouse, for as much time as she will be able to spend on the trail, seems downright romantic.

All right, I have a stake in all this. For my money, John Edwards is the best candidate out there. Clinton has Iraqi and American blood on her hands; Obama has yet to lay out clear economic alternatives; and, although they might once have been Republican moderates, McCain and Giuliani are shamelessly snuggling up to the Christianist right. I like Edwards because he's taken up the banner of the little guy and gal in America's grossly one-sided class war. He's laid out a plan for universal health insurance; he wants to repeal Bush's tax cuts for the rich; he shows up at workers' picket lines.

I met him on a panel last fall, and he is good-looking enough to merit Coulter's suspicion that he can't possibly be straight (though, really, Ann, if you want to crank up your "gay-dar," you should get away from those pimply right-wingers and meet some new guys.) He's modest, low-key, friendly, and, although he's wealthy now, he spoke movingly from his family's experience of poverty.

As for Elizabeth Edwards, all I know is this: When I was being subjected to chemotherapy six years ago, the one thing that kept me going was work. Every morning I would go down to my desk in the basement to confront the computer screen and the stacks of books and papers around it. I ended up not using the chapter -- on ancient Roman games -- I was writing at the time (for the book just published as "Dancing in the Streets: A History of Collective Joy"), but I desperately needed to be at least 2,000 miles and 2,000 years away from my affliction. So I say to Elizabeth, if I may call her that: Get out there, girl, and campaign like hell!

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election08, john edwards, cancer, elizabeth edwards

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of 13 books, most recently "Dancing in the Streets: A History of Collective Joy."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Support Hillary Rodham Clinton
Posted by: canada on Mar 30, 2007 12:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Senator Rodham Clinton did what was right then - the commander in chief gives a reason to going to war in Iraq and the American people who were so into the Republicans and who were supporting Bush ( they did make him the President ) and his going to war that even Dixie Chicks became a hate target when they spoke against Bush and the war - Hillary Clinton is a member of the committee that has to make a decision - anyone in her position is expected to support the President. It is a different story that the President lied ( although he claims faulty intelligence ) So Hillary gave her support. Why are people out to punish her ? I do not see a good reason. Her answer is quite acceptable to me. There is no reason for her to apologise. If Americans want an apology then why don't they ask President Bush to do so and why don't they hold him responsible ? Now too late Americans have realised that Iraq was a huge mistake.
Hillary Clinton has said that she will bring the soldiers home.
This year Americans gave a big kick to the Republicans and no matter who becomes the Republican candidate next year Americans should keep in mind all the many scandals that have surfaced in the Republican administration. It is time to give a Democrat a chance at governing and Hillary Clinton is the best choice.

I was quite impressed with Hillary Rodham Clinton's performance at the town hall meeting in Iowa.
She answered all questions with poise and detail and came
across looking every bit Presidential.
I believe her when she says she will deliver on Universal Health Care. In 1993-94 she was ridiculed when she wanted
a plan that would benefit all Americans. Now Americans see the urgent need for such a plan. She was the architect.
She has so many good ideas. Given a chance she can do quite well as the next President of the United States.
When she came to NY to seek a Senate seat there was skepticism but New Yorkers who are tough when it comes to voting gave her a chance and she has worked very hard as a Senator. Her answer to a question from a reporter concerning Elizabeth Edwards was classy. She has been on four committees - She is the first New Yorker ever to serve on the Senate Armed Services Committee, working to see that America's military has the necessary resources to protect our national security. She has visited troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. She has travelled the world and knows world leaders. She has the necessary experience in politics.
Going forward Americans will see that she is a genuine person. Politics is simply not her passion for power but she wants to deliver what the current Republican administration has failed to do. She will not be run by corporations.
She will bring in a balanced budget and a better economy.
And she will make her own decisions as a leader and as a President. But whatever she does it will give better life to the many Citizens who live below the poverty line.
And finally she has promised to make Bill an ambassador to the world which the former President already enjoys and is held in high esteem. Just keep an open mind and support Senator Clinton in her efforts to become the first woman President of the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ehrenreich Ad Hominem
Posted by: apophenia_monkey on Apr 4, 2007 7:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typical I suppose from the author who pretended to work at menial jobs and then spin-doctor the entire situation.

A weak commentary--at best, all Ehrenreich does is attack the person asking the questions in an orgy of two wrongs make a right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]