Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The '60s Are Gone, But One of Its Most Controversial Organizations Is Back

By Astra Taylor, AlterNet. Posted March 22, 2007.


Since its fiery demise in 1969, there have been various attempts to revive Students for a Democratic Society. All such efforts failed ... until recently.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Astra Taylor

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In April of 1965 a young man named Paul Potter took the stage at the first march on Washington against the war in Vietnam. "What kind of system is it that justifies the U.S. or any other country seizing the destinies of the Vietnamese people and using them callously for its own purpose?" he asked the crowd, before enjoining them to "name that system, describe it, analyze it, understand it, and change it."

Potter was president of Students for a Democratic Society, or SDS, the group behind the demonstration. The largest and most influential activist youth organization of the 1960s, SDS united around the ideal of "participatory democracy" and encouraged radical analysis, emphasizing the connections between issues like poverty, racism and the Vietnam War. A media success, the march thrust SDS into the national spotlight. Over the next four years membership swelled to include upwards of 100,000 young people, but by 1970 the group had self-destructed.

Today Students for a Democratic Society occupies an almost mythical place in the history of the '60s, embodying both the promise and disappointment of Vietnam era youth activism. Since its fiery demise in 1969, there have been various attempts to revive SDS.

All such efforts failed, until recently.

Pat Korte of Stonington, Conn., and Jessica Rapchik of Chapel Hill, N.C., were high school seniors last year when they met on a conference call for participants in the World Can't Wait: Drive Out the Bush Regime campaign, one of the only nationwide protest games in town.

"After a while we felt very disillusioned. We felt powerless," Rapchik told me. Turned off by the lack of spontaneity and authoritarian undertones in discussions among the organizers, Korte and Rapchik realized the Revolutionary Communist Party -- a group that "definitely promotes violent overthrow of the government and revolution," as Rapchik put it -- was running the show.

It wasn't exactly the vibrant, spontaneous and inclusive peace movement they were looking to become part of. And so, after a couple of private phone conversations, the high school seniors went to their respective libraries and did some reading about past efforts to produce social change. Inspired by SDS's guiding ideal of "participatory democracy," they decided to revive the group.

Meanwhile, unbeknownst to them, Alan Haber, who played an instrumental role in the 1959 founding of SDS was having similar inklings up in Michigan, the original birthplace of the organization. Back in Ann Arbor after a long interlude in the Bay Area, Haber felt the time had come for the group's resurrection.

With a sense that the time was again ripe for New Left sentiments, Haber went to work doing what he does best: getting folks involved in the quest for peace. He put some fliers on telephone poles around town. "The last meeting was 35 years ago," they read. Approximately 30 people of varying ages showed up; soon enough, an SDS chapter formed on the university campus.

Unaware of these developments, Korte, an articulate and determined young idealist with a mop of unruly brown hair, got in touch with Haber to share his and Rapchik's vision. With that -- an 18-year-old reaching out to a man approaching 70 -- the nascent SDS signaled its first significant break with its previous incarnation, once famous for shunning the input of elders (defined, most dramatically, as "anyone over 30").

Since then, the organization's membership has mushroomed, exceeding Korte and Rapchik's wildest expectations. Boosters of the new SDS claim it is the fastest-growing multi-issue student group in history, already dwarfing comparable organizations like the International Socialist Organization. Official membership has passed the 2,000 mark, and there are approximately 140 university-based chapters across the country and 46 more at high schools.

According to Brian Kelley, a Pace University sophomore who is partly responsible for maintaining the website, new chapters are forming every week. Frustrated by the prevalence of single-issue groups on campus and the authoritarian politics or infighting between anti-war groups off campus, college students are gravitating towards the new SDS, which offers a youth-led, radically democratic program and a broad political focus.

Return to Chicago

But is it possible -- or, perhaps more importantly, desirable -- to revive a political organization that has been defunct for almost four decades? And not just any organization, but one with an incredibly vexed history -- and one whose previous members are still alive?

In 1969, SDS held its last national convention in Chicago, an event that has gone down in historical infamy. The proceedings devolved into sectarian madness, with Maoist militants facing off against the Marxist-Leninists, and what would become the Weather Underground Organization emerging as the most powerful faction.

Most of SDS's 100,000 members simply walked away, demoralized and disgusted. Thirty-seven years later SDS was back in Chicago, and I stood late last August chatting with Haber amidst the bustle of the first national convention of the revitalized SDS.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: students for a democratic, sds, weather underground

Astra Taylor is a writer and documentary filmmaker. Her first book, "Shadow Of the Sixties," is forthcoming from the New Press in 2007.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Welcome back, SDS.
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 22, 2007 6:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Vietnam veteran who protested LBJ's war in the Sixties, I rooted for the SDS movement. Now more than ever, to end another Texan's grandiose military adventure, we need that same kind of patriotism again – in huge amounts.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome back, SDS. Posted by: yellow
» To yellow: Join MoveOn.org Posted by: HughScott
Interesting piece of their structural and philosophical re-emergence....
Posted by: Prophit on Mar 22, 2007 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... but little information on subjects they consider their target for action. What is their agenda, does anyone know? What are their issues? 100 people at a recruiting station or some at ports doesn't give you the entire big picture for a national convention.

Can anyone join the adult section who wasn't a previous SDS member?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"SDS" -- A romantic brand
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Mar 22, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whaetever the faults and failures of the late-60s SDS were, the NAME is still compelling and familiar, ... like 'IRA ' and 'CocaCola' -- it's the Real Thing. At least there can be no question that a revived SDS can be anything BUT a sincere, far-Left, authentically radical political force ... outside electoral politics and not easily seduced with offers of internships and access to Esablishment authority figures.

What went wrong in the past ?

Well, too many SDSers decided to act out a 19th century Revolution fantasy drama (with themselves as the Heroes) as if black powder bombs and mimeographed manifestos had the potential to usher in the millenium.

But before that could happen, two other bits of wrongheadedness got out of control. These can be characterized by two quotes:

1) "Never trust anyone over 30"
and
2) "We gotta get some chicks to make the sandwitches and run the mimeograph machines.

The radical student left 1964 -1972 had an enormous infatuation with youth and masculinity ... so that female comrads had to speak and act 'like men' and anything remotely like feminist understanding of women's issues was simply not in the discussion, let alone on the agenda. (If you don't know why that was problem, you're likely to be PART of the problem, this time around).

The rejection of 'grey hairs' was delightful for the 'young bucks,' who needed only originality, enthusiasm, and charisma to become undisputed leaders of their cells and factions without any old dudes with real world experience getting in their way.

Still if there is an SDS renaissance, it is one of the most hopeful developments of the past 15 years. We've heard the Right whining and wingeing about the 'extreme left' ... NOW the're going to see what an Extreme Left might actually sound like -- and 'don't we wish they may enjoy it !"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YIPPIE!
Posted by: geo9tx on Mar 22, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SDS is back! YIPPIE! I held little hope for for our future, that is until I read this story. Without our youth taking a stand, this government (not mine) was sure to bring about the end of fredom for all mankind. Not just here in the good 'ol USA, but everywhere on this planet. Its my hope that at some point in time SDS can go international and ..........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ditto YIPPIE! Posted by: Aussie Kim
A BLAST FROM THE PAST
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 22, 2007 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember it well. Did they change the world? Probably not. But they give the powers that be something to think about. Without opposiiton the steam roller we call government continues to roll over us. The last six years doesn't seem real to me. I'm glad that someone else noticed. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more power to 'em!! watch the right wing go ballistic!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Mar 22, 2007 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need the SDS back. If anything, our society and government are even sicker and worse then they were in the '60s.

And, I have to confess to having gleeful fantasies of the right-wing in this country literally crapping in their pants and frothing at the mouth at the mere thought of a rebirth of the SDS.

Imagine the son or daughter of that greedy and vicious CEO: coming home and announcing "Dad--I've joined the SDS!"

Beautiful! Beautiful! Beautiful!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is an organization necessary?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Mar 22, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The goal of the SDS is participatory democracy and the SDS is a means to attain the goal. The past strategy of the SDS has been demonstrations and disruption.

This organization is appealing because the members are visibly united and feel the power of their group in their disruption. It's doubly appealing to youth because they're rebelling against their parents' generation's control. They feel brave and daring. Though this is is all very normal they feel unique.

The appeal of any organization is cameraderie. My question is, "can we achieve the same goal without the pleasure of the emotional content?".

The Lincoln Initiative is a strategy to attain the same goal of participatory democracy. It is a grassroots movement without an organization, without leaders, without followers. Every participant is a "member" for only a few minutes while he/she uses the strategy to make his/her voice heard and to recruit other participants. There are no public demonstrations, no meetings, no contributions and no emotional ties between members.

The strategy will work with enough participants because it's based on the successful tactics of the labor unions and boycotts. What is questionable is, "can individuals bond emotionally with abstractions like "patriotism", "freedom", "democracy", and "government of the people, by the people, and for the people without the cameraderie?".
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The main reason we need SDS: NO DRAFT.
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 22, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neoconservatives, especially those who formed the Project For a New American Century (PNAC) in 1997, want an obedient "all-volunteer" army to do their bidding.

More importantly to neocons, the use of "volunteer" soldiers reduces public protest over preemptive warfare, a keystone of PNAC’s grand design to dominate the world with U.S. military power.

Not coincidentally, during the Nixon administration it was Rep. Donald Rumsfeld, a PNAC founder, who introduced legislation in Congress to kill the draft. He later joined another PNAC founder, Dick Cheney, in the Pentagon and created no-bid, “singe-source” contracts that made both men wealthy war whores.

There is nothing that neocons fear more than organized national outrage against the Iraq War, which a reborn SDS would inspire.

For a list of 225 PNAC members ("signatories") including rightwing Democrats in liberal clothing, visit King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hope
Posted by: xgroverx on Mar 22, 2007 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was aware of the revival of SDS, as a chapter began at my school after I graduated, and was disappointed that I couldn't join since I wasn't a student anymore. I didn't realize, however, that MDS existed and will definitely be joining this organization.

I see the resurgence of SDS as a real beacon of hope. I see the ideals of participatory democracy, of freedom, unity, equality, beginning to rise up in my generation from all the angst, disenfranchisement, and isolation, and I can only hope that brighter days lie ahead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This may be the missing element we need to make a difference.
Posted by: johngary66 on Mar 22, 2007 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am very happy to see the return of SDS. I have wondered when the young were going to do their part in fighting to get America back for it's people. There is a big job to do and it should be their time to lead. The difference this time could be the babyboomers supporting them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dirty Hippies are the reason the movement failed.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Mar 22, 2007 3:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Need to get away from the unkempt, hippie stylings of the leftist movement. Groups such as these are so easy to penetrate by government operators (like Conintelpro did). They can easily fall victim to agent provocateur operations. They can be easily identified (t-dye, 'white rasta' look, long hair, smell, etc) and so its hard to really do worthwhile operations into power structures. It is also hard to get 'square' people, the majority, to sympathise with them. Lastly, motivation when surrounded by nubile women, marihuana, and easy living is easily depleted from the actual cause to just using the group to get laid/high.

I'm not advocating violence but if people want change they should look to effectively organised groups. Use small cadres of dedicated people. Act and look 'normal'. Try to hold down regular jobs (this helps gains access to the system from the inside.) Limit knowledge of membership and operate as independent units in cell structures. Maintain discipline and dedication (avoid love triangles, sex between members, drug/alcohol use, etc.) Examples are:
RAF, Weathermen, PUSH, JRA, The Order, Brigrate Rossi, and, most importantly RZ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

World Can't Wait
Posted by: Bastet62 on Mar 22, 2007 6:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
World Can't Wait is NOT a communist organization - this is a error in the report. There may be MEMBERS of the communist party in WCW who participate, but there are far more people, like me, who are democrats, or greens, or whatever. This is a perpetuation of a rumor and not true fact. While I respect the content of the article- this seems to be a rather big error.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Where are the Students?"
Posted by: oregoncharles on Mar 23, 2007 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what we've been wondering. (I live in a college town - one that was notoriously conservative in the 60's, but isn't now.) Evidently we weren't radical enough to inspire them (though a surprising number wear black - now, that's radical.)

A point I wonder about: original SDS'ers couldn't vote. These can. We shall see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]