Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

What Lessons Can Progressives Learn from Evangelicals?

By Zack Exley, In These Times. Posted March 21, 2007.


Some churches have left progressives in the dust in terms of serving and engaging people directly. Now, a new evangelical movement offers tips for the left.
03212007story
Advertisement

Recently, I blogged a series of essays titled "The Revolution Misses You," in which I called for progressives to revive the forgotten dream of practical yet radical change. Friends and colleagues immediately scolded me for using "extreme" terms such as "revolution" and "radical." "You'll only alienate people," they said. "This will come back to haunt you."

At first, I was surprised by what felt like a dramatic overreaction. But I soon realized why I had fallen out of sync with the progressive mainstream on the use of the "R-words": I had been spending time listening to and reading evangelical Christians who are preaching revolution.

In Grand Rapids, Mich., a 36-year-old evangelical pastor named Rob Bell regularly describes his ministry as "revolutionary," "radical" and "an insurgency." Far from alienating people with such language, Bell's Mars Hill Bible Church draws thousands of new worshipers each year from the mostly conservative and white suburbs of west Michigan. In one recent sermon, available as a podcast from MarsHill.org, Bell tells his congregation that the only time Jesus speaks of God directly taking someone's life is the Parable of the Rich Fool (Luke 12:13-22), a story about a man who builds bigger barns to store a surplus harvest instead of sharing it with those in need. He closed the sermon by listing a dozen places around Grand Rapids where congregants could unload their own surplus wealth.

In his book Irresistible Revolution, 30-year-old author Shane Claiborne, who is currently living in Iraq to "stand in the way of war," asks evangelicals why their literal reading of the Bible doesn't lead them to do what Jesus so clearly told wealthy and middle-class people to do in his day: give up everything to help others.

The popular evangelical Christian magazine Relevant, launched in 2003 by Cameron Strang, the son of a Christian publishing magnate, contains a "Revolution" section complete with a raised red fist for a logo. They've also released The Revolution: A Field Manual for Changing Your World, a compilation by radical, Christian social-justice campaigners from around the world.

Bell and Claiborne are two of the better-known young voices of a broad, explicitly nonviolent, anti-imperialist and anticapitalist theology that is surging at the heart of white, suburban Evangelical Christianity. I first saw this movement at a local, conservative, nondenominational church in North Carolina where the pastor preached a sermon called "Two Fists in the Face of Empire." Looking further, I found a movement whose book sales tower over their secular progressive counterparts in Amazon rankings; whose sermon podcasts reach thousands of listeners each week; and whose messages, in one form or another, reach millions of churchgoers. Bell alone preaches to more than 10,000 people every Sunday, with more than 50,000 listening in online.

--------------------------

But this movement is still barely aware of its own existence, and has not chosen a label for itself. George Barna, who studies trends among Christians for clients such as the Billy Graham Evangelical Association and Focus on the Family, calls it simply "The Revolution" and its adherents "Revolutionaries."

"The media are oblivious to it," Barna wrote in his 2006 book Revolution: Finding Vibrant Faith Beyond the Walls of the Sanctuary. "Scholars are clueless about it. The government caught a glimpse of it in the 2004 presidential election but has mostly misinterpreted its nature and motivations." According to his research, there are more than 20 million Revolutionaries in America, differentiated from mainstream evangelicals by a greater likelihood of serving their community and the poor and oppressed within it, a more "intimate, personally stirring worship of God" in daily life, and a much greater chance of studying the Bible every day.

One indication that this movement is new, nebulous and spontaneous is that Gregory Boyd, a like-minded mega-church pastor two states away in St. Paul, Minn., knew nothing of Rob Bell's theology until recently. He only heard of the pastors' conference after the fact because his book Myth of a Christian Nation: How the Quest for Political Power is Destroying the Church was distributed to conference participants.

"There's definitely something going on," says Boyd. "I've only become aware of it as people have responded to my book. It's not organized -- it's amorphic. It would include the 'emerging church movement,' but it's bigger than that. It's a vision of the kingdom [of God]. It's a new kind of Christianity."

Heather Zydek, the former "Revolution" section editor for Relevant magazine and the editor of The Revolution: A Field Manual for Changing Your World, says, "I definitely don't have a name for it, but, yes, something is happening. Some people say it's a Generation X -- or Y -- thing. But baby boomers are in on it too."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: evangelicals, progressives

Zack Exley is a senior strategist with OMP, a D.C.-based communications and fundraising firm, and co-founder of the New Organizing Institute. He can be reached at his Web site, ZackExley.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I am impressed...
Posted by: Blade on Mar 21, 2007 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article has everything that the Cornell West speech lacked.

I was brought up in a Baptist church, and left it behind years ago. Cynical, you would call me, and for a long time, so. But this new information strikes to the roots of why I left "the church" so long ago, inaction toward what and who really matters.

I am forwarding this link to some Christian friends of mine who really need to see it, and will further investigate it myself.
I wouldn't mind helping such an effort. A new sort of activism...

They may have a chance, if this "movement" is for real... If this article is not hyperbole...

See, my cynicism runs deep...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cynicism... Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: I am impressed... Posted by: Veronique
» RE: I am impressed... Posted by: T-Mc
» Blade - Good to hear from you Posted by: Veronique
» I agree with you. Posted by: Philip Newton
This is something I've noticed for years
Posted by: ISlamIslam on Mar 21, 2007 3:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"There's definitely something going on," says Boyd. "I've only become aware of it as people have responded to my book. It's not organized -- it's amorphic. It would include the 'emerging church movement,' but it's bigger than that. It's a vision of the kingdom [of God]. It's a new kind of Christianity."

This observation may come as a surprise to Leftists such as this author, but it doesn't surprise most conservatives. In fact, I've never understood the Left's fear and loathing of present-day Christianity, not only because, in my estimation, the majority of Christians have always been about as threatening as toy poodles but also given Christianity's trend over the past decade or two toward Leftist ideology on many global issues. This article supports my observation that much of Christianity is evolving into a Rick Warren/Jimmy Carter variant that has much more in common with the Left in this country than the Right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm an agnostic, not a Christian Posted by: ISlamIslam
The lesson evangicals teach: Don't listen to them!
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 21, 2007 3:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If evangelical Christians weren't such hypocrites (on average), I would not only listen to them but engage in serious conversation. But it is clear to me that while they follow Old Testament doctrine to a "T", evangelicals (again on average) consider the New Testament a book of suggestions.

President Bush is a sterling example of born-again hypocrisy. He obviously doesn't follow the Ten Commandments, at least the one about lying -- "Thou shall not bear false witness." Dub-ya has made a career out of bearing false witness, as his history of deceptions shows.

And forget the peaceful proclamations of Jesus; the president has mocked those gentle words as well, such as turning one's cheek, forgiveness and loving other human beings.

For Bush loyalists who disagree, I suggest they research the Karl Rove-orchestrated smear campaigns against Vietnam War heroes John McCain, Max Clelland and John Kerry. Would Jesus have condoned those vicious actions? No, of course not. But Shrub the Charlatan did.

One of my proudest accomplishments in life happened during the seventh grade in Shreveport, LA, when I received a New Testament Bible for not missing Sunday school an entire year. The Good Book was written in plain English, without "thous" and "thees." I can still remember the text as being comforting and non-confrontational, just the opposite of George W.'s hypocritical words and deeds.

You can verify his two-faced charade by going online and visiting websites that compare Bush's behavior with the teachings of Jesus. There is no similarity. Shrub talks the talk of a Christian, but when it comes to the walk, like all snake oil salesmen, he slithers.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sbrooks - on Methodists Posted by: Veronique
» Research Posted by: Philip Newton
As A Christian Whose Friends Are Almost All Non-Believers...
Posted by: ZPaul on Mar 21, 2007 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..And as a Christian who is fed up with the churches, this helps give me hope that there are not a few Christians who actually think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Lessons Can Progressives Learn from Evangelicals? NOTHING!
Posted by: Aufklaerung_Baboon on Mar 21, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What an absurd assertion this article is -- these people should be learning from the progressives!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Did you read the article? Posted by: Philip Newton
Following Jesus' example - WOW what a concept!
Posted by: sfortuna on Mar 21, 2007 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a profoundly committed athiest, I'm less concerned with the motivations of this movement than I am with their actions, passion and direction. I realize that 90% of humanity is genetically wired to believe in something, and as long as they do, it might as well move them to embrace the causes of justice, peace and community empowerment. I'd be glad to work side-by-side with these 'revolutionary christians" in reigning in corporate influence, empowering the poor, promoting sustainable communities and alternative fuels and bringing an end to our military-industrial complex. To me, shared goals are more important than individual motivations, and I am very curious to see how this movement will play out. I think people are tired of dogma, of the Falwell's and Dobson's "my well or hell" approach. It's pretty easy to see they covet gold and fame a lot more than modesty and compassion. I'm acutely aware of the anger, fear and guilt radiating from the right-wing fundies as they realize their sanctimonious obsessions do not lead to happiness. Let's hope that a new, socially aware christian movement may provide the numbers to accomplish our leftist goals of social and economic justrice, peace and the end of the military-industrial stranglehold. If they don't mind working with godless heathens, I won't mind working with them. A revolutionary is a revolutionary, no matter where their motivation springs. Even this athiest appreciates Jesus as a pretty good teacher and role model.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Revolutionary?
Posted by: redstarwraith on Mar 21, 2007 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting to read this in light of Cornel West's recent speech. I thought West made a brilliant point in saying (paraphrased here) the political landscape of America is a religious one and that that factor has to be acknowledged by anyone trying to effect change. I winced when I heard West say that but I must grudgingly admit he is, for better or worse, correct. That IS the landscape we are dealing with. To deny that is to bury one's head in the sand.
Certainly it is easy to see the inherent and internal antagonisms in Dobson's, Robertson's, et al ministry. In fact there are so many that they threaten to tear that whole movement apart. People like Wallis are "the other side of the evangelical coin" so to speak. Though Wallis emphasizes a "kinder, gentler" Xnty more in keeping with the Gosples, I warn that the evangelical movement as a whole (specifically its insistance on a literal interpretation of the Bible) may split the progressive movement. What West said as a statement, I took more as a warning. No one can afford to ignore religion today, that much is certain, but that does NOT imply that the rest of us need collapse carelessly into religious mythology. The religious task should be to "get right with secular society" and NOT expect that it is somehow the task of secular society to reconcile itself to religion. To the extent that any religion in the US can accomplish this, then and ONLY then will I call it "revolutionary' - anything less deserves the title COUNTER-REVOLUTIONARY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: evolutionary? Posted by: poppop_schell
» Not a monolith Posted by: Philip Newton
dammit! They stole "revolution"
Posted by: ladyoracle on Mar 21, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is absolutely true that there are progressive churches out there; you see them marching in anti-war protests and even gay rights events.

However, for the most part they are not, so it makes me frustrated to see them take "revolution" and "radical" away from us. And call me clueless, but I don't have a problem with those words anyway. However, since the French Revolution, which turned out so bloody, politics has had a tenuous relationship wtih that word.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The First Real Hope
Posted by: terradea on Mar 21, 2007 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the first time in years that I've felt hope for America. If these "new" Christian ideas take the place of the Christianist ideas in the media and government, our country will stand a chance. Now, if only we can find out when and where Pat Robertson and his gang is planning to detonate the doomsday bomb ...

... and stop it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen Posted by: Philip Newton
Why is Shane so confused??
Posted by: MAD on Mar 21, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"30-year-old author Shane Claiborne, who is currently living in Iraq to "stand in the way of war," asks evangelicals why their literal reading of the Bible doesn't lead them to do what Jesus so clearly told wealthy and middle-class people to do in his day: give up everything to help others."

That's an easy one Shane: because the vast majority of Jews, Christians and Muslims don't truly give a shit about anyone but themselves. Most simply enjoy the status that being "deeply religious" confers upon them in their respective intolerant, ignorant and fascist circles.

Religious adherents are the most hypocritical people you could ever hope to meet who would sooner sever their right hand than follow in the footsteps of Jesus. Sadly though, non-religious adherents are, generally speaking, only slightly less hypocritical as the vast majority of them aren't out committing selfless acts but rather being selfish. They are less hypocritical only because they do not betray the mystical belief structure to which Christians pay great lip service but rarely comply. They do like to wag their fingers at Christians while actually doing very little themselves, but at least in most cases, non-religious adherents don't believe that killing Iraqis or Afghanis is a family value.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MORMONS Posted by: CatDad
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: CatDad
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: morticia
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING VS Atheists Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: morticia
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: MORMONS AND TITHING Posted by: morticia
» Those in need Posted by: fork
» RE: Those in need Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Those in need Posted by: fork
» RE: Those in need Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Those in need Posted by: fork
» RE: Those in need Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Those in need Posted by: fork
» RE: Those in need Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Those in need Posted by: fork
» RE: Those in need Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Those in need Posted by: fork
» Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Virtual mission Posted by: fork
» Tarbrush Posted by: Philip Newton
This is not new information
Posted by: rileycase on Mar 21, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zach Exley writes an interesting article, and it should be helpful to the AlterNet folk who tend to have a skewed view of evangelicals. I live with this reality every day. I chair the local Rescue Mission with a budget of $1.7 million, not a cent of which comes from tax money. The donated man-hours are worth far more than the money. The people who do all this are both liberal and conservative, progressive and evangelical, but anyone close to the situation knows the vast majority would be labeld evangelical, charismatic, fundamentalist, or generally right-wing. There is nothing about politics in this. No one is talking Republican, Democrat, or whatever. It is people doing what they are called to do. The preachers in the churches these people attend preach the rich young ruler and the man who builds the bigger barns all the time. I admit this is not New York or San Francisco where I find people much more alienated and cynical and politicized. But this is an important part of Americana (and Christianity).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This is not new information Posted by: poppop_schell
» No, actually... Posted by: doctorsquared
» RE: No, actually... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: No, actually... Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: No, actually... Posted by: poppop_schell
Thanks for the openmindedness.
Posted by: Jim on Mar 21, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most alternet pieces that mention Christianity have been very negative. Thanks, Alternet, for publishing something that mentions the Christians who take the teachings of Jesus seriously. I have been part of the intentional Christian community movement for decades, and welcome the new growth of truely Biblical Christians. The revolution is growing!

But watch out if you choose to work with us on progressive agenda. We also will be quietly praying for your receiving of eternal life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What if I asked you not to? Posted by: doctorsquared
Progressives can learn to avoid apocalyptic prophesies...
Posted by: rwa on Mar 21, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...fear mongering, psuedo-scientific, faith based predictions of calamity such as peak oil etc... It's actually just armegeddon for the secular crowd. There seems to be a powerful attraction to these dogmas which actually have very negetive consequences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Read Stephen Mitchell
Posted by: silkreed on Mar 21, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those sceptical of Christianity have reason given its history and all the politically motivated stuff that found its way into the Bible. But sift it out and the core teaching is clear. Try "The Gospel According to Jesus" or "Jesus: What He Really Said and Did" (a shorter and young-people friendly version) by Stephen Mitchell. It's all the Good stuff and there is so incredibly much heart and depth there...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HOW WONDERFUL TO SEE EVANGELICALS CATCHING UP TO THE MORMON CHURCH
Posted by: poppop_schell on Mar 21, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Mormon, I am so glad that "progressive" evangelicals are beginning to really see what the Gospel of Jesus Christ is really all about and to see them developing people orinted programs similar to what the Mormon Church has been doing for over 50 years.

The major item lacking in their movement is to have a God called and ordained Prophet like Isaiah or Jeremiah lead them and provide continuing revelations for today's world. Unfortunately, they are left to the good intentions of pastors.

That is NOT the case with the Mormon Church which has had living prophets since 1830 when the Church was established in NY but now has over 12 million memebrs in every nation which allows the preaching of the Gospel. The current Prophet is named Gordon B. Hinckley who is 96 years old but travels to countries around the world proclaiming along with 12 Apostles the message of the Restored Gosepl of Jesus Christ.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SOME PEOPLE MARCH TO THEIR OWN DRUMMER
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 21, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not everyone has a need to 'belong to a movement'. Progressives have not missed the boat. Maybe they like it their own way. It's possible to have a religion without making loud public statements. Some of us like our privacy. That doesn't mean we've missed anything. It's unfair to make assumptions about others. It's judgemental. I choose not to be part of the Evangelical experience. I do not feel left behind. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REAL TEMPLES RATHER THAN SHOPPING MALLS
Posted by: poppop_schell on Mar 21, 2007 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God's holiest works have always been done in Temples. One of the few times that Jesus got "angry" was when the Jews were acting as moneychangers within the walls of the Temple.

FYI, the Mormon Church is the only Christan one that has Temples where Jesus's presence is often there. The highest and holiest of acts are done within the walls of these Temples. There are over 130+ Temples around the world today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Lessons Can Progressives Learn from Evangelicals?
Posted by: pfm on Mar 21, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a certain degree of stage theatrics associated with the Evangelical movement which taps into our contemporary need for sight, sound, movement, a bit of flamboyancy and theatrics. Progressives might be wise to consider incorporating some of that into the messages we send and whatever are messages are they need to be attuned to the contemporary 30 second sound bite mass media solutions and methods of presentation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good News: Evangelical Troops Now Wearing Shiny New Liberal Uniforms!
Posted by: thirdmg on Mar 21, 2007 9:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"According to Wallis, the Revolutionaries are 'breaking away from the Right in droves -- but they will never be captured by the left. They're going to challenge the left on a lot of things: For these Christians, sex is covenantal and not recreational. And they oppose abortion and they are not going to move away from that.'"

If "sex is covenantal," then nothing fundamental is changing in the mentality of the zealots. Translate "sex is covenantal" to mean that sex is acceptable only in the context of marriage between a man and a woman for the purpose of procreation. Controlling sexual behavior and attitudes towards sex is at the heart of the authoritarian mentality. (Just ask gays about their experience.) There's nothing revolutionary about the "Revolutionaries" this article talks about. They've just exchanged the old dingy uniforms of conservatism for the new shiny uniforms of liberalism.

True revolutionaries don't talk only about going back to the roots of Christianity. They talk about changing and updating Christian values from the roots upwards. Here's some genuinely revolutionary commentary by a liberal bishop about the need for Christianity to revise its attitudes toward sexuality:

Sex and Christianity: Re-thinking the Relationship

"The point I am trying to make is that Christianity as a religion stands in need of a better theology of sexuality, a better understanding of the complex role sexuality plays in our human nature, and of the purposes of God in creating us as sexual beings, among other things. The Church must find a way to discover that human beings are sexual beings and, in the words of the creation stories in the Book Genesis, that 'this is very good.' Our sexuality is essential to who we are."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nope Posted by: Philip Newton
J Edgar Hoover School of Advanced US Politics
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 21, 2007 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the lessons a US leader needs to know were written decades ago by J Edgar Hoover and his henchmen:

1) don't get caught with a dead girl
2) don't get caught with a live boy

Evangelicals chose to ignore these rules (Haggard, Foley, etc) and paid the price. Progressives appear, at least on the outside, to have a better appreciation of history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Revolution?
Posted by: oregoncharles on Mar 21, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Indeed, it's been obvious for some time that the Religious Right were extremely un-Christian - even anti-Christian. After all, they're preaching hate, not love.

The basic values of progressives come mostly from the ethical teachings of Jesus, as modified by the Enlightenment. That makes liberal churches, which have given up their authoritarian history, our natural allies.

Now we see the same discovery in CONSERVATIVE churches. Big surprise: Jesus was a socialist. And he said nothing about abortion or gay marriage (aside from "succor the downtrodden," that is; as opposed to kicking them while they're down).

Nonetheless, I worry when essentially conservative churches start preaching "revolution!". Have they first given up any ambition to impose their "values" on others? I think not, given the continued emphasis on sexual Puritanism. Their "revolution" could easily turn political and authoritarian, just as the earlier evangelical movement did.

As long as they stay out of politics, they are valuable allies. I would love to see a commitment to tolerance and secularism from these people. Until then, I will not feel safe in their presence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: evolution? Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: evolution? where you going to go? Posted by: oregoncharles
Are we sure these aren't lessons that evangelicals learned from leftists?
[